Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
More Annotations
A complete backup of gasteinertal.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of beyondmeasure.co.uk
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of mygrocerydeals.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of testingnewborns.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Favourite Annotations
Tandläkare Stockholm | Distriktstandvården
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Virtual Reality - Latest Virtual Reality News Headset Reviews
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
لول رنگ - پالت رنگ های مورد تایید آی وحید و رنگ فلت کد رنگ flat color
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Motoroccasion.nl, de grootste in nieuwe en tweedehands motoren
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
KarmaFree Cooking | Sharing my Vegetarian Lifestyle and Delicious Vegetarian Recipes with You
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Lowongan Kerja Terbaru Agustus 2019 - LOKERJOS.INFO
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Free SVG Cut files, Projects, and Tutorials for Silhouette CAMEO & Cricut Explore
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Text
submittted by
PRESS RELEASE THE “ENRICA LEXIE INCIDENT (THE ITALIAN PRESS RELEASE . THE “ENRICA LEXIE” INCIDENT (THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC V.THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA) . THE HAGUE, 2 JULY 2020 . Publication of the Operative Part (Dispositif) of the Arbitral Tribunal’s Award In the arbitration under Annex VII to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (“UNCLOS” PCA CASE NO. 2012-12 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION pca 76076 pca case no. 2012-12 in the matter of an arbitration before a tribunal constituted in accordance with the agreement between the government of hong kong and the government of PCA CASE Nº 2016-10 IN THE MATTER OF THE MARITIME … Annex 1: The Parties’ Representatives Annex 2: Part XV and Annex V of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Annex 3: Notice of Conciliation Annex 4: Response to Notice Annex 5: Letter from the Parties to the Permanent Court of Arbitration of 11 May 2016 Annex 6: Letter from the Parties to the Commissioners of 11 May 2016 Annex 7: Press Releases Nos. 1 to 3 PCA CASE Nº 2013-19 IN THE MATTER OF THE SOUTH CHINA … The South China Sea Arbitration Award of 12 July 2016 i REPRESENTATIVES OF THE PARTIES REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA AGENT Mr. Jose C. Calida Solicitor General of the Philippines replacing Solicitor General Florin T. Hilbay, as of 30June 2016
PRESS RELEASE
PRESS RELEASE 1 THE SOUTH CHINA SEA ARBITRATION (THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES V.THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA) The Hague, 12 July 2016 The Tribunal Renders Its Award A unanimous Award has been issued today by the Tribunal constituted under Annex VII to the United CHAPTER V – THE SECTOR COVERED BY THE 1902 TREATY … CHAPTER V – 1902 TREATY (WESTERN SECTOR) 38 See Chapter VII, below, for consideration of the boundary within rivers. 60 Thus, it was the February 1903 demarcation that brought the tripoint to the north bank of the Setit opposite the Khor Royan. 5.12 It is not open to the Commission to change the agreed tripoint between Eritrea, DISPUTE BETWEEN BARBADOS AND THE REPUBLIC OF … dispute between barbados and the republic of trinidad and tobago referred to arbitration in accordance with annex vii unclos by notification of barbados dated 16 IN THE MATTER OF THE CHAGOS MARINE PROTECTED AREA in the matter of the chagos marine protected area arbitration - before - an arbitral tribunal constituted under annex vii of the united nations convention on the law of the sea PCA CASE Nº 2013-19 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION pca case nº 2013-19 . in the matter of an arbitration - before - an arbitral tribunal constituted under annex vii to the . 1982 united nations convention on the law of the sea MAURITIUS V UNITED KINGDOM arbitration under annex vii of the united nations convention on the law of the sea . mauritius . v. united kingdom . counter-memorial .submittted by
PRESS RELEASE THE “ENRICA LEXIE INCIDENT (THE ITALIAN PRESS RELEASE . THE “ENRICA LEXIE” INCIDENT (THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC V.THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA) . THE HAGUE, 2 JULY 2020 . Publication of the Operative Part (Dispositif) of the Arbitral Tribunal’s Award In the arbitration under Annex VII to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (“UNCLOS” PCA CASE NO. 2012-12 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION pca 76076 pca case no. 2012-12 in the matter of an arbitration before a tribunal constituted in accordance with the agreement between the government of hong kong and the government of PCA CASE Nº 2016-10 IN THE MATTER OF THE MARITIME … Annex 1: The Parties’ Representatives Annex 2: Part XV and Annex V of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Annex 3: Notice of Conciliation Annex 4: Response to Notice Annex 5: Letter from the Parties to the Permanent Court of Arbitration of 11 May 2016 Annex 6: Letter from the Parties to the Commissioners of 11 May 2016 Annex 7: Press Releases Nos. 1 to 3 PCA CASE Nº 2013-19 IN THE MATTER OF THE SOUTH CHINA … The South China Sea Arbitration Award of 12 July 2016 i REPRESENTATIVES OF THE PARTIES REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA AGENT Mr. Jose C. Calida Solicitor General of the Philippines replacing Solicitor General Florin T. Hilbay, as of 30June 2016
PRESS RELEASE
PRESS RELEASE 1 THE SOUTH CHINA SEA ARBITRATION (THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES V.THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA) The Hague, 12 July 2016 The Tribunal Renders Its Award A unanimous Award has been issued today by the Tribunal constituted under Annex VII to the United CHAPTER V – THE SECTOR COVERED BY THE 1902 TREATY … CHAPTER V – 1902 TREATY (WESTERN SECTOR) 38 See Chapter VII, below, for consideration of the boundary within rivers. 60 Thus, it was the February 1903 demarcation that brought the tripoint to the north bank of the Setit opposite the Khor Royan. 5.12 It is not open to the Commission to change the agreed tripoint between Eritrea, DISPUTE BETWEEN BARBADOS AND THE REPUBLIC OF … dispute between barbados and the republic of trinidad and tobago referred to arbitration in accordance with annex vii unclos by notification of barbados dated 16 IN THE MATTER OF THE CHAGOS MARINE PROTECTED AREA in the matter of the chagos marine protected area arbitration - before - an arbitral tribunal constituted under annex vii of the united nations convention on the law of the sea PCA CASE NO. 2019-28 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION Dispute Concerning the Detention of Ukrainian Naval Vessels and Servicemen PCA Case No. 2019-28 Procedural Order No. 1 Page 2 of 4 WHEREAS Ukraine and the Russian Federation are parties to the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (“UNCLOS” or the“Convention”);
PCA CASE Nº 2016-10 IN THE MATTER OF THE MARITIME … Annex 1: The Parties’ Representatives Annex 2: Part XV and Annex V of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Annex 3: Notice of Conciliation Annex 4: Response to Notice Annex 5: Letter from the Parties to the Permanent Court of Arbitration of 11 May 2016 Annex 6: Letter from the Parties to the Commissioners of 11 May 2016 Annex 7: Press Releases Nos. 1 to 3PRESS RELEASE
PRESS RELEASE 1 THE SOUTH CHINA SEA ARBITRATION (THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES V.THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA) The Hague, 12 July 2016 The Tribunal Renders Its Award A unanimous Award has been issued today by the Tribunal constituted under Annex VII to the United CHAPTER III THE TASK OF THE COMMISSION AND THE … CHAPTER III – TASK OF THE COMMISSION AND APPLICABLE LAW 4 Serbian Loans, PCIJ Series A, Nos. 20/21, p. 5, at p. 38 (12 July 1929). 5 Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970), ICJ Reports 1971, at p.22. 2222 at that time. The Commission agrees with this approach and has borne IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER THE ARBITRATION pca case no. 2015-28 . in the matter of an arbitration - before - an arbitral tribunal constituted under annex vii . to the 1982 united nations convention on the law of the sea CHAPTER V – THE SECTOR COVERED BY THE 1902 TREATY … CHAPTER V – 1902 TREATY (WESTERN SECTOR) 38 See Chapter VII, below, for consideration of the boundary within rivers. 60 Thus, it was the February 1903 demarcation that brought the tripoint to the north bank of the Setit opposite the Khor Royan. 5.12 It is not open to the Commission to change the agreed tripoint between Eritrea, PCA CASE NO. 2016-39 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION … PCA Case No. 2016-39 Procedural Order No. 2 31 January 2018 Page 3 of 20 PCA 218912 I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 1. By Notice of Arbitration dated 19 July 2016, the Claimant initiated this arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules and Article 8 MAURITIUS V. UNITED KINGDOM - 3 - D124993.2 number of islands located in the Indian Ocean, including Diego Garcia. Until 1965, the United Kingdom accepted the Chagos Archipelago as part of the Territory of Mauritius, IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER THE UNITED … in the matter of an arbitration under the . united nations commission on international trade law . and the north american free trade agreement . between: IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION PURSUANT TO AN … THE ERITREA – YEMEN ARBITRATION 1 The identification of the specific islands or island groups in dispute between the Parties has been entrusted to the Tribunal by Article 2 of the Arbitration Agreement (see para. 7, above), and is dealt with in the part of this ward A PCA CASE Nº 2013-19 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION pca case nº 2013-19 . in the matter of an arbitration - before - an arbitral tribunal constituted under annex vii to the . 1982 united nations convention on the law of the sea MAURITIUS V UNITED KINGDOM arbitration under annex vii of the united nations convention on the law of the sea . mauritius . v. united kingdom . counter-memorial .submittted by
PRESS RELEASE THE “ENRICA LEXIE INCIDENT (THE ITALIAN PRESS RELEASE . THE “ENRICA LEXIE” INCIDENT (THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC V.THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA) . THE HAGUE, 2 JULY 2020 . Publication of the Operative Part (Dispositif) of the Arbitral Tribunal’s Award In the arbitration under Annex VII to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (“UNCLOS” PCA CASE NO. 2012-12 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION pca 76076 pca case no. 2012-12 in the matter of an arbitration before a tribunal constituted in accordance with the agreement between the government of hong kong and the government of PCA CASE Nº 2016-10 IN THE MATTER OF THE MARITIME … Annex 1: The Parties’ Representatives Annex 2: Part XV and Annex V of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Annex 3: Notice of Conciliation Annex 4: Response to Notice Annex 5: Letter from the Parties to the Permanent Court of Arbitration of 11 May 2016 Annex 6: Letter from the Parties to the Commissioners of 11 May 2016 Annex 7: Press Releases Nos. 1 to 3 PCA CASE Nº 2013-19 IN THE MATTER OF THE SOUTH CHINA … The South China Sea Arbitration Award of 12 July 2016 i REPRESENTATIVES OF THE PARTIES REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA AGENT Mr. Jose C. Calida Solicitor General of the Philippines replacing Solicitor General Florin T. Hilbay, as of 30June 2016
PRESS RELEASE
PRESS RELEASE 1 THE SOUTH CHINA SEA ARBITRATION (THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES V.THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA) The Hague, 12 July 2016 The Tribunal Renders Its Award A unanimous Award has been issued today by the Tribunal constituted under Annex VII to the United CHAPTER V – THE SECTOR COVERED BY THE 1902 TREATY … CHAPTER V – 1902 TREATY (WESTERN SECTOR) 38 See Chapter VII, below, for consideration of the boundary within rivers. 60 Thus, it was the February 1903 demarcation that brought the tripoint to the north bank of the Setit opposite the Khor Royan. 5.12 It is not open to the Commission to change the agreed tripoint between Eritrea, DISPUTE BETWEEN BARBADOS AND THE REPUBLIC OF … dispute between barbados and the republic of trinidad and tobago referred to arbitration in accordance with annex vii unclos by notification of barbados dated 16 IN THE MATTER OF THE CHAGOS MARINE PROTECTED AREA in the matter of the chagos marine protected area arbitration - before - an arbitral tribunal constituted under annex vii of the united nations convention on the law of the sea PCA CASE Nº 2013-19 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION pca case nº 2013-19 . in the matter of an arbitration - before - an arbitral tribunal constituted under annex vii to the . 1982 united nations convention on the law of the sea MAURITIUS V UNITED KINGDOM arbitration under annex vii of the united nations convention on the law of the sea . mauritius . v. united kingdom . counter-memorial .submittted by
PRESS RELEASE THE “ENRICA LEXIE INCIDENT (THE ITALIAN PRESS RELEASE . THE “ENRICA LEXIE” INCIDENT (THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC V.THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA) . THE HAGUE, 2 JULY 2020 . Publication of the Operative Part (Dispositif) of the Arbitral Tribunal’s Award In the arbitration under Annex VII to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (“UNCLOS” PCA CASE NO. 2012-12 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION pca 76076 pca case no. 2012-12 in the matter of an arbitration before a tribunal constituted in accordance with the agreement between the government of hong kong and the government of PCA CASE Nº 2016-10 IN THE MATTER OF THE MARITIME … Annex 1: The Parties’ Representatives Annex 2: Part XV and Annex V of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Annex 3: Notice of Conciliation Annex 4: Response to Notice Annex 5: Letter from the Parties to the Permanent Court of Arbitration of 11 May 2016 Annex 6: Letter from the Parties to the Commissioners of 11 May 2016 Annex 7: Press Releases Nos. 1 to 3 PCA CASE Nº 2013-19 IN THE MATTER OF THE SOUTH CHINA … The South China Sea Arbitration Award of 12 July 2016 i REPRESENTATIVES OF THE PARTIES REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA AGENT Mr. Jose C. Calida Solicitor General of the Philippines replacing Solicitor General Florin T. Hilbay, as of 30June 2016
PRESS RELEASE
PRESS RELEASE 1 THE SOUTH CHINA SEA ARBITRATION (THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES V.THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA) The Hague, 12 July 2016 The Tribunal Renders Its Award A unanimous Award has been issued today by the Tribunal constituted under Annex VII to the United CHAPTER V – THE SECTOR COVERED BY THE 1902 TREATY … CHAPTER V – 1902 TREATY (WESTERN SECTOR) 38 See Chapter VII, below, for consideration of the boundary within rivers. 60 Thus, it was the February 1903 demarcation that brought the tripoint to the north bank of the Setit opposite the Khor Royan. 5.12 It is not open to the Commission to change the agreed tripoint between Eritrea, DISPUTE BETWEEN BARBADOS AND THE REPUBLIC OF … dispute between barbados and the republic of trinidad and tobago referred to arbitration in accordance with annex vii unclos by notification of barbados dated 16 IN THE MATTER OF THE CHAGOS MARINE PROTECTED AREA in the matter of the chagos marine protected area arbitration - before - an arbitral tribunal constituted under annex vii of the united nations convention on the law of the sea PCA CASE NO. 2019-28 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION Dispute Concerning the Detention of Ukrainian Naval Vessels and Servicemen PCA Case No. 2019-28 Procedural Order No. 1 Page 2 of 4 WHEREAS Ukraine and the Russian Federation are parties to the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (“UNCLOS” or the“Convention”);
PCA CASE Nº 2016-10 IN THE MATTER OF THE MARITIME … Annex 1: The Parties’ Representatives Annex 2: Part XV and Annex V of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Annex 3: Notice of Conciliation Annex 4: Response to Notice Annex 5: Letter from the Parties to the Permanent Court of Arbitration of 11 May 2016 Annex 6: Letter from the Parties to the Commissioners of 11 May 2016 Annex 7: Press Releases Nos. 1 to 3PRESS RELEASE
PRESS RELEASE 1 THE SOUTH CHINA SEA ARBITRATION (THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES V.THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA) The Hague, 12 July 2016 The Tribunal Renders Its Award A unanimous Award has been issued today by the Tribunal constituted under Annex VII to the United CHAPTER III THE TASK OF THE COMMISSION AND THE … CHAPTER III – TASK OF THE COMMISSION AND APPLICABLE LAW 4 Serbian Loans, PCIJ Series A, Nos. 20/21, p. 5, at p. 38 (12 July 1929). 5 Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970), ICJ Reports 1971, at p.22. 2222 at that time. The Commission agrees with this approach and has borne IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER THE ARBITRATION pca case no. 2015-28 . in the matter of an arbitration - before - an arbitral tribunal constituted under annex vii . to the 1982 united nations convention on the law of the sea CHAPTER V – THE SECTOR COVERED BY THE 1902 TREATY … CHAPTER V – 1902 TREATY (WESTERN SECTOR) 38 See Chapter VII, below, for consideration of the boundary within rivers. 60 Thus, it was the February 1903 demarcation that brought the tripoint to the north bank of the Setit opposite the Khor Royan. 5.12 It is not open to the Commission to change the agreed tripoint between Eritrea, PCA CASE NO. 2016-39 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION … PCA Case No. 2016-39 Procedural Order No. 2 31 January 2018 Page 3 of 20 PCA 218912 I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 1. By Notice of Arbitration dated 19 July 2016, the Claimant initiated this arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules and Article 8 MAURITIUS V. UNITED KINGDOM - 3 - D124993.2 number of islands located in the Indian Ocean, including Diego Garcia. Until 1965, the United Kingdom accepted the Chagos Archipelago as part of the Territory of Mauritius, IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER THE UNITED … in the matter of an arbitration under the . united nations commission on international trade law . and the north american free trade agreement . between: IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION PURSUANT TO AN … THE ERITREA – YEMEN ARBITRATION 1 The identification of the specific islands or island groups in dispute between the Parties has been entrusted to the Tribunal by Article 2 of the Arbitration Agreement (see para. 7, above), and is dealt with in the part of this ward A MAURITIUS V UNITED KINGDOM arbitration under annex vii of the united nations convention on the law of the sea . mauritius . v. united kingdom . counter-memorial .submittted by
PCA CASE Nº 2013-19 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION pca case nº 2013-19 . in the matter of an arbitration - before - an arbitral tribunal constituted under annex vii to the . 1982 united nations convention on the law of the sea PRESS RELEASE THE “ENRICA LEXIE INCIDENT (THE ITALIAN PRESS RELEASE . THE “ENRICA LEXIE” INCIDENT (THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC V.THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA) . THE HAGUE, 2 JULY 2020 . Publication of the Operative Part (Dispositif) of the Arbitral Tribunal’s Award In the arbitration under Annex VII to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (“UNCLOS” PCA CASE Nº 2013-19 IN THE MATTER OF THE SOUTH CHINA … The South China Sea Arbitration Award of 12 July 2016 i REPRESENTATIVES OF THE PARTIES REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA AGENT Mr. Jose C. Calida Solicitor General of the Philippines replacing Solicitor General Florin T. Hilbay, as of 30June 2016
PCA CASE Nº 2016-10 IN THE MATTER OF THE MARITIME … Annex 1: The Parties’ Representatives Annex 2: Part XV and Annex V of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Annex 3: Notice of Conciliation Annex 4: Response to Notice Annex 5: Letter from the Parties to the Permanent Court of Arbitration of 11 May 2016 Annex 6: Letter from the Parties to the Commissioners of 11 May 2016 Annex 7: Press Releases Nos. 1 to 3 PCA CASE NO. 2012-12 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION pca 76076 pca case no. 2012-12 in the matter of an arbitration before a tribunal constituted in accordance with the agreement between the government of hong kong and the government of IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNITED NATIONS … 2 II. KOREA HAS NOT ESTABLISHED ITS OBJECTIONS TO THE TRIBUNAL’S COMPETENCE 6. The Tribunal’s jurisdiction is straightforward. The General Partner, a US investor, has brought its claim under the Free Trade Agreement (the “Treaty”) between the United States and the Republic of Korea (“Korea,” together with the United States, the “Contracting Parties”).2 Like many other REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES V. PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA - 2 - extreme, with several detached rocks around”. 3. H3221/1933 and the 1944 sailing directions included in H019893/1944 and H2098/1962-HD384 both state that Alicia Annie Reef “dries, DISPUTE BETWEEN BARBADOS AND THE REPUBLIC OF … dispute between barbados and the republic of trinidad and tobago referred to arbitration in accordance with annex vii unclos by notification of barbados dated 16 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER THE UNITED … in the matter of an arbitration under the . united nations commission on international trade law . and the north american free trade agreement . between: MAURITIUS V UNITED KINGDOM arbitration under annex vii of the united nations convention on the law of the sea . mauritius . v. united kingdom . counter-memorial .submittted by
PCA CASE Nº 2013-19 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION pca case nº 2013-19 . in the matter of an arbitration - before - an arbitral tribunal constituted under annex vii to the . 1982 united nations convention on the law of the sea PRESS RELEASE THE “ENRICA LEXIE INCIDENT (THE ITALIAN PRESS RELEASE . THE “ENRICA LEXIE” INCIDENT (THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC V.THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA) . THE HAGUE, 2 JULY 2020 . Publication of the Operative Part (Dispositif) of the Arbitral Tribunal’s Award In the arbitration under Annex VII to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (“UNCLOS” PCA CASE Nº 2013-19 IN THE MATTER OF THE SOUTH CHINA … The South China Sea Arbitration Award of 12 July 2016 i REPRESENTATIVES OF THE PARTIES REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA AGENT Mr. Jose C. Calida Solicitor General of the Philippines replacing Solicitor General Florin T. Hilbay, as of 30June 2016
PCA CASE Nº 2016-10 IN THE MATTER OF THE MARITIME … Annex 1: The Parties’ Representatives Annex 2: Part XV and Annex V of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Annex 3: Notice of Conciliation Annex 4: Response to Notice Annex 5: Letter from the Parties to the Permanent Court of Arbitration of 11 May 2016 Annex 6: Letter from the Parties to the Commissioners of 11 May 2016 Annex 7: Press Releases Nos. 1 to 3 PCA CASE NO. 2012-12 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION pca 76076 pca case no. 2012-12 in the matter of an arbitration before a tribunal constituted in accordance with the agreement between the government of hong kong and the government of IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNITED NATIONS … 2 II. KOREA HAS NOT ESTABLISHED ITS OBJECTIONS TO THE TRIBUNAL’S COMPETENCE 6. The Tribunal’s jurisdiction is straightforward. The General Partner, a US investor, has brought its claim under the Free Trade Agreement (the “Treaty”) between the United States and the Republic of Korea (“Korea,” together with the United States, the “Contracting Parties”).2 Like many other REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES V. PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA - 2 - extreme, with several detached rocks around”. 3. H3221/1933 and the 1944 sailing directions included in H019893/1944 and H2098/1962-HD384 both state that Alicia Annie Reef “dries, DISPUTE BETWEEN BARBADOS AND THE REPUBLIC OF … dispute between barbados and the republic of trinidad and tobago referred to arbitration in accordance with annex vii unclos by notification of barbados dated 16 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER THE UNITED … in the matter of an arbitration under the . united nations commission on international trade law . and the north american free trade agreement . between:PCA :: ABOUT US
The PCA acts as registry in arbitrations or other proceedings under contracts or other agreements to which one party is a state, state-controlled entity, or intergovernmental organization, including: PCA Case No.2020-45:EcuadorTLC S.A. (Ecuador) v. The Republic ofEcuador.
PROCEDURAL ORDER NO. 2 PCA Case No. 2016-7 Procedural Order No. 2 12 August 2016 4 and that “the default rule in investment arbitration is transparency.”9 According to the Respondent, “the legitimacy of REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES V. PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA - 2 - extreme, with several detached rocks around”. 3. H3221/1933 and the 1944 sailing directions included in H019893/1944 and H2098/1962-HD384 both state that Alicia Annie Reef “dries, ENGLISH TIMOR SENTENCE EDITED 1 ARBITRAL AWARD RENDERED IN EXECUTION OF THE COMPROMIS SIGNED AT THE HAGUE, APRIL 3, 1913 BETWEEN THE NETHERLANDS AND PORTUGAL ON THE SUBJECT OF THE BOUNDARY OF A PART OF THEIR POSSESSIONS IN THE ISLAND OF TIMOR 25 JUNE 1914 A dispute having arisen between the Royal Netherlands Government and that of the IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNITED NATIONS … 2 II. KOREA HAS NOT ESTABLISHED ITS OBJECTIONS TO THE TRIBUNAL’S COMPETENCE 6. The Tribunal’s jurisdiction is straightforward. The General Partner, a US investor, has brought its claim under the Free Trade Agreement (the “Treaty”) between the United States and the Republic of Korea (“Korea,” together with the United States, the “Contracting Parties”).2 Like many other IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER THE ARBITRATION ”), a company established under the laws of Estonia. The Claimant operated gamblingrelated - companies and property in Ukraine. 5. The Claimant is represented in these proceedings by Denis Lysenko, PavloByelousov,
PCA CASE NO. 2015-28 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION pca case no. 2015-28 . in the matter of an arbitration - before - an arbitral tribunal constituted under annex vii . to the 1982 united nations convention on the law of the sea PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION THE ISLAND OF PALMAS … permanent court of arbitration the island of palmas case (or miangas) united states of america v. the netherlands award of the tribunal _____ arbitrator m. huber the hague, 4 april 1928 DISPUTE CONCERNING THE “ENRICA LEXIE” INCIDENT THE … arbitration under annex vii of the united nations convention on the law of the sea pca case no. 2015-28 _____ dispute concerning the “enrica lexie” incident IN THE MATTER OF THE CHAGOS MARINE PROTECTED AREA in the matter of the chagos marine protected area arbitration - before - an arbitral tribunal constituted under annex vii of the united nations convention on the law of the sea PCA CASE Nº 2013-19 IN THE MATTER OF THE SOUTH CHINA … The South China Sea Arbitration Award of 12 July 2016 i REPRESENTATIVES OF THE PARTIES REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA AGENT Mr. Jose C. Calida Solicitor General of the Philippines replacing Solicitor General Florin T. Hilbay, as of 30June 2016
PRESS RELEASE DISPUTE CONCERNING COASTAL STATE … PRESS RELEASE . DISPUTE CONCERNING COASTAL STATE RIGHTS IN THE BLACK SEA, SEA OF AZOV, AND KERCH STRAIT (UKRAINE V. THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION) . THE HAGUE, 16 MARCH 2020 . Publication of Award Concerning Preliminary Objections of the Russian Federation In an arbitration under Annex VII to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea(“UNCLOS”
PCA CASE Nº 2013-19 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION pca case nº 2013-19 . in the matter of an arbitration - before - an arbitral tribunal constituted under annex vii to the . 1982 united nations convention on the law of the sea PCA CASE NO. 2012-12 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION pca 76076 pca case no. 2012-12 in the matter of an arbitration before a tribunal constituted in accordance with the agreement between the government of hong kong and the government of PCA CASE NO. 2016-39 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION … PCA Case No. 2016-39 Procedural Order No. 2 31 January 2018 Page 3 of 20 PCA 218912 I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 1. By Notice of Arbitration dated 19 July 2016, the Claimant initiated this arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules and Article 8 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNITED NATIONS … 2 II. KOREA HAS NOT ESTABLISHED ITS OBJECTIONS TO THE TRIBUNAL’S COMPETENCE 6. The Tribunal’s jurisdiction is straightforward. The General Partner, a US investor, has brought its claim under the Free Trade Agreement (the “Treaty”) between the United States and the Republic of Korea (“Korea,” together with the United States, the “Contracting Parties”).2 Like many otherPRESS RELEASE
PRESS RELEASE 1 THE SOUTH CHINA SEA ARBITRATION (THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES V.THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA) The Hague, 12 July 2016 The Tribunal Renders Its Award A unanimous Award has been issued today by the Tribunal constituted under Annex VII to the United PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION THE ISLAND OF PALMAS …PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATIONPERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION WIKIPEDIAPERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION PCAPERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION RULESISLAND OF PALMAS CASE SUMMARYCOURT OF ARBITRATION permanent court of arbitration the island of palmas case (or miangas) united states of america v. the netherlands award of the tribunal _____ arbitrator m. huber the hague, 4 april 1928 DISPUTE BETWEEN BARBADOS AND THE REPUBLIC OF … dispute between barbados and the republic of trinidad and tobago referred to arbitration in accordance with annex vii unclos by notification of barbados dated 16 PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION IRON RHINE CASE … 1 Chapter 1: Introduction Having received Belgium’s Memorial on the Iron Rhine case on 1 October 2003, the Netherlands hereby presents its response in accordance with Article 11, paragraph 2 of the PCA CASE Nº 2013-19 IN THE MATTER OF THE SOUTH CHINA … The South China Sea Arbitration Award of 12 July 2016 i REPRESENTATIVES OF THE PARTIES REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA AGENT Mr. Jose C. Calida Solicitor General of the Philippines replacing Solicitor General Florin T. Hilbay, as of 30June 2016
PRESS RELEASE DISPUTE CONCERNING COASTAL STATE … PRESS RELEASE . DISPUTE CONCERNING COASTAL STATE RIGHTS IN THE BLACK SEA, SEA OF AZOV, AND KERCH STRAIT (UKRAINE V. THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION) . THE HAGUE, 16 MARCH 2020 . Publication of Award Concerning Preliminary Objections of the Russian Federation In an arbitration under Annex VII to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea(“UNCLOS”
PCA CASE Nº 2013-19 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION pca case nº 2013-19 . in the matter of an arbitration - before - an arbitral tribunal constituted under annex vii to the . 1982 united nations convention on the law of the sea PCA CASE NO. 2012-12 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION pca 76076 pca case no. 2012-12 in the matter of an arbitration before a tribunal constituted in accordance with the agreement between the government of hong kong and the government of PCA CASE NO. 2016-39 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION … PCA Case No. 2016-39 Procedural Order No. 2 31 January 2018 Page 3 of 20 PCA 218912 I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 1. By Notice of Arbitration dated 19 July 2016, the Claimant initiated this arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules and Article 8 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNITED NATIONS … 2 II. KOREA HAS NOT ESTABLISHED ITS OBJECTIONS TO THE TRIBUNAL’S COMPETENCE 6. The Tribunal’s jurisdiction is straightforward. The General Partner, a US investor, has brought its claim under the Free Trade Agreement (the “Treaty”) between the United States and the Republic of Korea (“Korea,” together with the United States, the “Contracting Parties”).2 Like many otherPRESS RELEASE
PRESS RELEASE 1 THE SOUTH CHINA SEA ARBITRATION (THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES V.THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA) The Hague, 12 July 2016 The Tribunal Renders Its Award A unanimous Award has been issued today by the Tribunal constituted under Annex VII to the United PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION THE ISLAND OF PALMAS …PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATIONPERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION WIKIPEDIAPERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION PCAPERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION RULESISLAND OF PALMAS CASE SUMMARYCOURT OF ARBITRATION permanent court of arbitration the island of palmas case (or miangas) united states of america v. the netherlands award of the tribunal _____ arbitrator m. huber the hague, 4 april 1928 DISPUTE BETWEEN BARBADOS AND THE REPUBLIC OF … dispute between barbados and the republic of trinidad and tobago referred to arbitration in accordance with annex vii unclos by notification of barbados dated 16 PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION IRON RHINE CASE … 1 Chapter 1: Introduction Having received Belgium’s Memorial on the Iron Rhine case on 1 October 2003, the Netherlands hereby presents its response in accordance with Article 11, paragraph 2 of the PCA CASE Nº 2013-19 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION pca case nº 2013-19 . in the matter of an arbitration - before - an arbitral tribunal constituted under annex vii to the . 1982 united nations convention on the law of the sea MAURITIUS V UNITED KINGDOM arbitration under annex vii of the united nations convention on the law of the sea . mauritius . v. united kingdom . counter-memorial .submittted by
PCA CASE NO. 2014-07 IN THE MATTER OF THE DUZGIT … Duzgit Integrity Arbitration (Malta v. São Tomé and Príncipe) Award on Reparation Page v of v DRAMATIS PERSONAE DS Tankers DS Tankers Limited, a Maltese company and the owner of the Duzgit Integrity Duzgit Integrity The M/T Duzgit Integrity, a chemical tanker registered in Malta, owned by DS Tankers, and chartered by Stena Oil PCA CASE Nº 2016-10 IN THE MATTER OF THE MARITIME … Annex 1: The Parties’ Representatives Annex 2: Part XV and Annex V of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Annex 3: Notice of Conciliation Annex 4: Response to Notice Annex 5: Letter from the Parties to the Permanent Court of Arbitration of 11 May 2016 Annex 6: Letter from the Parties to the Commissioners of 11 May 2016 Annex 7: Press Releases Nos. 1 to 3 PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION THE ISLAND OF PALMAS … permanent court of arbitration the island of palmas case (or miangas) united states of america v. the netherlands award of the tribunal _____ arbitrator m. huber the hague, 4 april 1928 ENGLISH TIMOR SENTENCE EDITED 1 ARBITRAL AWARD RENDERED IN EXECUTION OF THE COMPROMIS SIGNED AT THE HAGUE, APRIL 3, 1913 BETWEEN THE NETHERLANDS AND PORTUGAL ON THE SUBJECT OF THE BOUNDARY OF A PART OF THEIR POSSESSIONS IN THE ISLAND OF TIMOR 25 JUNE 1914 A dispute having arisen between the Royal Netherlands Government and that of the CHAPTER V – THE SECTOR COVERED BY THE 1902 TREATY … CHAPTER V – 1902 TREATY (WESTERN SECTOR) 38 See Chapter VII, below, for consideration of the boundary within rivers. 60 Thus, it was the February 1903 demarcation that brought the tripoint to the north bank of the Setit opposite the Khor Royan. 5.12 It is not open to the Commission to change the agreed tripoint between Eritrea, IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER THE UNITED … in the matter of an arbitration under the . united nations commission on international trade law . and the north american free trade agreement . between: DISPUTE CONCERNING THE “ENRICA LEXIE” INCIDENT THE … arbitration under annex vii of the united nations convention on the law of the sea pca case no. 2015-28 _____ dispute concerning the “enrica lexie” incident IN THE MATTER OF THE CHAGOS MARINE PROTECTED AREA in the matter of the chagos marine protected area arbitration - before - an arbitral tribunal constituted under annex vii of the united nations convention on the law of the sea PCA CASE Nº 2013-19 IN THE MATTER OF THE SOUTH CHINA … The South China Sea Arbitration Award of 12 July 2016 i REPRESENTATIVES OF THE PARTIES REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA AGENT Mr. Jose C. Calida Solicitor General of the Philippines replacing Solicitor General Florin T. Hilbay, as of 30June 2016
PCA CASE Nº 2013-19 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION pca case nº 2013-19 . in the matter of an arbitration - before - an arbitral tribunal constituted under annex vii to the . 1982 united nations convention on the law of the sea MAURITIUS V UNITED KINGDOM arbitration under annex vii of the united nations convention on the law of the sea . mauritius . v. united kingdom . counter-memorial .submittted by
PCA CASE NO. 2012-12 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION pca 76076 pca case no. 2012-12 in the matter of an arbitration before a tribunal constituted in accordance with the agreement between the government of hong kong and the government of PCA CASE Nº 2016-10 IN THE MATTER OF THE MARITIME … Annex 1: The Parties’ Representatives Annex 2: Part XV and Annex V of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Annex 3: Notice of Conciliation Annex 4: Response to Notice Annex 5: Letter from the Parties to the Permanent Court of Arbitration of 11 May 2016 Annex 6: Letter from the Parties to the Commissioners of 11 May 2016 Annex 7: Press Releases Nos. 1 to 3 PCA CASE NO. 2015-28 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION pca case no. 2015-28 . in the matter of an arbitration - before - an arbitral tribunal constituted under annex vii. of the 1982 united nations convention on the law of the seaPRESS RELEASE
PRESS RELEASE 1 THE SOUTH CHINA SEA ARBITRATION (THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES V.THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA) The Hague, 12 July 2016 The Tribunal Renders Its Award A unanimous Award has been issued today by the Tribunal constituted under Annex VII to the United IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNITED NATIONS … 2 II. KOREA HAS NOT ESTABLISHED ITS OBJECTIONS TO THE TRIBUNAL’S COMPETENCE 6. The Tribunal’s jurisdiction is straightforward. The General Partner, a US investor, has brought its claim under the Free Trade Agreement (the “Treaty”) between the United States and the Republic of Korea (“Korea,” together with the United States, the “Contracting Parties”).2 Like many other DISPUTE CONCERNING THE “ENRICA LEXIE” INCIDENT THE … arbitration under annex vii of the united nations convention on the law of the sea pca case no. 2015-28 _____ dispute concerning the “enrica lexie” incident DISPUTE BETWEEN BARBADOS AND THE REPUBLIC OF … dispute between barbados and the republic of trinidad and tobago referred to arbitration in accordance with annex vii unclos by notification of barbados dated 16 PCA CASE Nº 2013-19 IN THE MATTER OF THE SOUTH CHINA … The South China Sea Arbitration Award of 12 July 2016 i REPRESENTATIVES OF THE PARTIES REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA AGENT Mr. Jose C. Calida Solicitor General of the Philippines replacing Solicitor General Florin T. Hilbay, as of 30June 2016
PCA CASE Nº 2013-19 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION pca case nº 2013-19 . in the matter of an arbitration - before - an arbitral tribunal constituted under annex vii to the . 1982 united nations convention on the law of the sea MAURITIUS V UNITED KINGDOM arbitration under annex vii of the united nations convention on the law of the sea . mauritius . v. united kingdom . counter-memorial .submittted by
PCA CASE NO. 2012-12 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION pca 76076 pca case no. 2012-12 in the matter of an arbitration before a tribunal constituted in accordance with the agreement between the government of hong kong and the government of PCA CASE Nº 2016-10 IN THE MATTER OF THE MARITIME … Annex 1: The Parties’ Representatives Annex 2: Part XV and Annex V of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Annex 3: Notice of Conciliation Annex 4: Response to Notice Annex 5: Letter from the Parties to the Permanent Court of Arbitration of 11 May 2016 Annex 6: Letter from the Parties to the Commissioners of 11 May 2016 Annex 7: Press Releases Nos. 1 to 3 PCA CASE NO. 2015-28 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION pca case no. 2015-28 . in the matter of an arbitration - before - an arbitral tribunal constituted under annex vii. of the 1982 united nations convention on the law of the seaPRESS RELEASE
PRESS RELEASE 1 THE SOUTH CHINA SEA ARBITRATION (THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES V.THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA) The Hague, 12 July 2016 The Tribunal Renders Its Award A unanimous Award has been issued today by the Tribunal constituted under Annex VII to the United IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNITED NATIONS … 2 II. KOREA HAS NOT ESTABLISHED ITS OBJECTIONS TO THE TRIBUNAL’S COMPETENCE 6. The Tribunal’s jurisdiction is straightforward. The General Partner, a US investor, has brought its claim under the Free Trade Agreement (the “Treaty”) between the United States and the Republic of Korea (“Korea,” together with the United States, the “Contracting Parties”).2 Like many other DISPUTE CONCERNING THE “ENRICA LEXIE” INCIDENT THE … arbitration under annex vii of the united nations convention on the law of the sea pca case no. 2015-28 _____ dispute concerning the “enrica lexie” incident DISPUTE BETWEEN BARBADOS AND THE REPUBLIC OF … dispute between barbados and the republic of trinidad and tobago referred to arbitration in accordance with annex vii unclos by notification of barbados dated 16PCA :: ABOUT US
The PCA only identifies the parties and publishes awards or other information in proceedings under PCA auspices where the parties haveso agreed.
PCA :: CASE RESULTS
Case name Type of case Name(s) of claimant(s) Name(s) of respondent(s) Seat of arbitration (by country) Date of commencement of proceeding Status of proceeding; Dispute Concerning the Detention of Ukrainian Naval Vessels and Servicemen (Ukraine v. the RussianFederation)
PRESS RELEASE DISPUTE CONCERNING COASTAL STATE … PRESS RELEASE . DISPUTE CONCERNING COASTAL STATE RIGHTS IN THE BLACK SEA, SEA OF AZOV, AND KERCH STRAIT (UKRAINE V. THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION) . THE HAGUE, 16 MARCH 2020 . Publication of Award Concerning Preliminary Objections of the Russian Federation In an arbitration under Annex VII to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea(“UNCLOS”
MAURITIUS V UNITED KINGDOM arbitration under annex vii of the united nations convention on the law of the sea . mauritius . v. united kingdom . counter-memorial .submittted by
PCA CASE Nº 2013-19 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION pca case nº 2013-19 . in the matter of an arbitration - before - an arbitral tribunal constituted under annex vii to the . 1982 united nations convention on the law of the sea PCA CASE Nº 2016-10 IN THE MATTER OF THE MARITIME … Annex 1: The Parties’ Representatives Annex 2: Part XV and Annex V of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Annex 3: Notice of Conciliation Annex 4: Response to Notice Annex 5: Letter from the Parties to the Permanent Court of Arbitration of 11 May 2016 Annex 6: Letter from the Parties to the Commissioners of 11 May 2016 Annex 7: Press Releases Nos. 1 to 3 PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION 3 8. Whereas on 6 September 2003 the Registrar of ITLOS was notified of the appointment of H.E. Professor Tommy Koh, Ambassador-at-Large in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, as Agent for Singapore; 9. Whereas on 20 September 2003 Singapore filed with the Registry of ITLOS its response to Malaysia, a certified copy of which was transmitted to theAgent for
PCA CASE Nº 2012-01 IN THE MATTER OF THE RAILWAY LAND iii Prime Minister Abdullah Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, Prime Minister of Malaysia from October 2003 to April 2009 Prime Minister Najib Dato’ Sri Mohd Najib bin Tun Abdul Razak, Prime Minister of Malaysia as from April 2009 railway lands Land in Singapore used for the operation of a railway, first by the MRA and later by KTMB Rule 4 Rule 4 of the Singapore Planning (Development Charges – MAURITIUS V. UNITED KINGDOM - 4 - D124993.2 its 200-mile Exclusive Economic Zone, as well as its 12-mile territorial sea and continental shelf. In 2008, pursuant to Articles 75(2) and 84(2) of the 1982 Convention, ERITREA - ETHIOPIA BOUNDARY COMMISSION DECISION Regarding Delimitation of the Border between The State of Eritrea, represented by: GOVERNMENT OF ERITREA His Excellency Mr. Ali Said Abdella, Foreign Minister of the State of Eritrea, Agent Professor Lea Brilmayer, Co-Agent, Legal Advisor to the Office of the President of Eritrea,* Français
* English
* Other
* العربية
* 中文
* Español
* Pусский
*
Permanent Court of ArbitrationMenu
* Français
* English
* Home
* About us
* Dispute Resolution Services* Cases
* Resources
* Global Cooperation*
*
CASES
THE PCA IS CURRENTLY ACTING AS REGISTRY IN 7 INTERSTATE PROCEEDINGS, 101 INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATIONS AND 52 CASES UNDER CONTRACTS OR OTHER AGREEMENTS INVOLVING A STATE OR OTHER PUBLIC ENTITY. A LIST OF CASES IN WHICH THE PARTIES HAVE AGREED TO RELEASE PUBLIC INFORMATION ABOUT THE CASE IS INCLUDED BELOW. INTERSTATE ARBITRATIONS * Arbitration pursuant to Article 32 of the Constitution of the Universal Postal Union (The State of Qatar v. The United ArabEmirates)
* Arbitration pursuant to Article 32 of the Constitution of the Universal Postal Union (The State of Qatar v. The Kingdom of SaudiArabia)
* Arbitration pursuant to Article 32 of the Constitution of the Universal Postal Union (The State of Qatar v. The Arab Republic ofEgypt)
* Arbitration pursuant to Article 32 of the Constitution of the Universal Postal Union (The State of Qatar v. The Kingdom ofBahrain)
* Dispute Concerning the Detention of Ukrainian Naval Vessels and Servicemen (Ukraine v. the Russian Federation) * Dispute Concerning Coastal State Rights in the Black Sea, Sea of Azov, and Kerch Strait (Ukraine v. the Russian Federation) * The 'Enrica Lexie' Incident (Italy v. India) INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATIONS * GPIX LLC v. The Republic of India * Patel Engineering Limited (India) v. The Republic ofMozambique
* Aecon Construction Group Inc. (Canada) v. The Republic ofEcuador
* Bacilio Amorrortu (USA) v. The Republic of Peru * Nord Stream 2 AG v. The European Union * Azucarera del Guadalfeo S.A. and Joaquín Francisco Martín Montero (Spain) v. Dominican Republic * The Renco Group, Inc. v. The Republic of Peru * Schindler Holding AG (Switzerland) v. Republic of Korea * IC Power Asia Development Ltd. (Israel) v. Republic ofGuatemala
* Leopoldo Castillo Bozo v. Republic of Panama * Jason Yu Song (United Kingdom) v. People’s Republic ofChina
* Panamericana Television S.A. et al v. The Republic ofPeru
* Chevron Overseas Finance GmbH v. The Republic of thePhilippines
* Olympic Entertainment Group AS (Estonia) v. Republic ofUkraine
* Antonio del Valle Ruiz and others v. The Kingdom of Spain * 1. Alberto Carrizosa Gelzis, 2. Felipe Carrizosa Gelzis, 3. Enrique Carrizosa Gelzis v. The Republic of Colombia * 1. Mason Capital L.P. (U.S.A.) 2. Mason Management LLC (U.S.A.) v. Republic of Korea * Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada * Elliott Associates, L.P. (U.S.A.) v. Republic of Korea * Khaitan Holdings (Mauritius) Limited v. Republic of India * Alcor Holdings Ltd. (UAE) v. The Czech Republic * 1. The Estate of Julio Miguel Orlandini-Agreda, 2. Compañía Minera Orlandini Ltda. v. The Plurinational State ofBolivia
* Conseil Economique Des Pays Musulmans (Switzerland) v.The State of Kuwait
* Diag Human SE and Mr. Josef Stava v. The Czech Republic * Fynerdale Holdings B.V. (Netherlands) v. Czech Republic * OOO Manolium Processing v. The Republic of Belarus * ICL Europe Coöperatief U.A. (the Netherlands) v. The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia * Bank Melli Iran (Iran) and Bank Saderat Iran (Iran) v. The Kingdom of Bahrain * NJSC Naftogaz of Ukraine (Ukraine) et al. v. The RussianFederation
* Glencore Finance (Bermuda) Limited v. Plurinational Stateof Bolivia
* Gold Pool JV Limited v. The Republic of Kazakhstan * Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. The Government of Canada * Cairn Energy PLC & Cairn UK Holdings Limited v. TheRepublic of India
* (1) Limited Liability Company Lugzor, (2) Limited Liability Company Libset, (3) Limited Liability Company Ukrinterinvest, (4) Public Joint Stock Company DniproAzot, (5) Limited Liability Company Aberon Ltd v. The Russian Federation * JSC CB PrivatBank v. The Russian Federation * Aeroport Belbek LLC and Mr. Igor Valerievich Kolomoisky v. The Russian Federation * (1) Natland Investment Group N.V. (The Netherlands), (2) Natland Group Limited (Cyprus), (3) G.I.H.G. Limited (Cyprus), (4) Radiance Energy Holding S.à.r.l. (Luxembourg) v. The Czech Republic * Venezuela US, S.R.L. (Barbados) v. The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela * 1. Chevron Corporation and 2. Texaco Petroleum Company v. The Republic of Ecuador * Bilcon of Delaware et al v. Government of Canada CONTRACT-BASED ARBITRATIONS * Ullum 1 Solar S.A.U. y Ullum 2 Solar S.A.U. v. Compañía Administradora del Mercado Mayorista Eléctrico S.A. * Fiambalá Solar S.A. v. Compañía Administradora del Mercado Mayorista Eléctrico S.A. * SITA Information Networking Computing UK Limited v. IranAirtours
* Enerlimp S.A. v. Compañía Administradora del Mercado Mayorista Eléctrico S.A. * Mota-Engil Ingeniería y Construcción S.A. - Sucursal Paraguay v. República del Paraguay - Ministerio de Obras Públicas yComunicaciones
* Sharr Beteiligungs GmbH (Germany) v. Privatization Agencyof Kosovo
* The Renco Group, Inc. & Doe Run Resources, Corp. v. The Republic of Peru & Activos Mineros S.A.C. * S.C. PA&CO International S.R.L. (Romania) v. Î.S. “Administrația de Stat a Drumurilor” (Moldova) * 1. NIB, S.A. – National Investment Bank (São Tomé e Príncipe), 2. Superior Investments LLC (E.U.A.), 3. Dr. Paulo Miguel Corte-Real Mirpuri (Portugal) vs. República Democrática de SãoTomé e Príncipe
* (1) Crescent Petroleum Company International Limited (2) Crescent Gas Corporation Limited v. National Iranian Oil CompanyOTHER PROCEEDINGS
* Ge Gao, Hongwei Meng, Zihong Meng and Ziheng Meng (China)v. INTERPOL
PAST CASES
INTERSTATE ARBITRATIONS * Arbitration under the Timor Sea Treaty (Timor-Leste v.Australia)
* The Duzgit Integrity Arbitration (Malta v. São Tomé andPríncipe)
* The Arctic Sunrise Arbitration (Netherlands v. Russia) * The Atlanto-Scandian Herring Arbitration (The Kingdom of Denmark in respect of the Faroe Islands v. The European Union) * The South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of Philippines v. The People's Republic of China) * Arbitration under the Timor Sea Treaty (Timor-Leste v.Australia)
* The ARA Libertad Arbitration (Argentina v. Ghana) * The Republic of Ecuador v. The United States of America * Arbitration Between the Republic of Croatia and the Republic of Slovenia * Railway Land Arbitration (Malaysia/Singapore) * Chagos Marine Protected Area Arbitration (Mauritius v.United Kingdom)
* Indus Waters Kishenganga Arbitration (Pakistan v. India) * Bay of Bengal Maritime Boundary Arbitration between Bangladesh and India * Land Reclamation by Singapore in and around the Straits of Johor (Malaysia v. Singapore) * Guyana v. Suriname * Barbados v. Trinidad and Tobago * Iron Rhine Arbitration (Belgium/Netherlands) * MOX Plant Case (Ireland v. United Kingdom) * Ireland v. United Kingdom (OSPAR Arbitration) * Eritrea-Ethiopia Claims Commission * Eritrea-Ethiopia Boundary Commission * The Rhine Chlorides Arbitration concerning the Auditing of Accounts (The Netherlands/France) * Eritrea/Yemen - Sovereignty and Maritime Delimitation inthe Red Sea
* Island of Palmas (or Miangas) (The Netherlands / The United States of America) * Norwegian Shipowners' Claims (Norway v. United States ofAmerica)
* Boundaries in the Island of Timor (The Netherlands v.Portugal)
* French Postal Vessel "Manouba" * Arrest and Return of Savarkar (France / Great Britain) * Russian Claim for Interest on Indemnities (Russia /Turkey)
* Canevaro claim (Italy / Peru) * The Orinoco Steamship Company case (United States of America / Venezuela) * The North Atlantic Coast Fisheries Case (Great Britain / United States of America) * Deserters of Casablanca (France/Germany) * The Grisbådarna Case * Muscat Dhows (France / Great Britain) * Preferential Treatment of Claims of Blockading Powers against Venezuela (Germany, Great Britain and Italy v. Venezuela) * Japanese House Tax (Germany, France, and Great Britain /Japan)
* The Pious Fund of the Californias (The United States of America v. The United Mexican States) INTERSTATE CONCILIATIONS * Timor Sea Conciliation (Timor-Leste v. Australia) OTHER INTERSTATE PROCEEDINGS * Review Panel established under the Convention on the Conservation and Management of High Seas Fishery Resources in theSouth Pacific Ocean
* Review Panel established under the Convention on the Conservation and Management of High Seas Fishery Resources in theSouth Pacific Ocean
INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATIONS * PJSC Gazprom v. Ukraine * 1. Mr. Gokul Das Binani, 2. Mrs. Madhu Binani (India) v. Republic of North Macedonia * (1) Professor Christian Doutremepuich (France) (2) Antoine Doutremepuich (France) v. Republic of Mauritius * 1. Sunlodges Ltd (BVI), 2. Sunlodges (T) Limited (Tanzania) v. The United Republic of Tanzania * Iberdrola Energía, S.A. (Spain) v. The Republic ofGuatemala
* Consutel Group S.P.A. in liquidazione (Italie) c. La République algérienne démocratique et populaire * Mr. Oleg Vladimirovich Deripaska (Russian Federation) v. the State of Montenegro * (1) Mr. Josias Van Zyl (South Africa), (2) The Josias Van Zyl Family Trust (South Africa), (3) The Burmilla Trust (South Africa) v. The Kingdom of Lesotho * Michael Ballantine and Lisa Ballantine v. DominicanRepublic
* Albacora, S.A. v. La República del Ecuador * 1.Manuel García Armas 2.Pedro García Armas 3.Sebastián García Armas 4.Domingo García Armas 5.Manuel García Piñero 6.Margaret García Piñero 7.Alicia García González 8.Domingo García Cámara 9.Carmen García Cámara c. República Bolivariana deVenezuela
* Indian Metals & Ferro Alloys Limited (India) v. The Government of the Republic of Indonesia * Everest Estate LLC et al. v. The Russian Federation * (i) Stabil LLC, (ii) Rubenor LLC, (iii) Rustel LLC, (iv) Novel-Estate LLC, (v) PII Kirovograd-Nafta LLC, (vi) Crimea-Petrol LLC, (vii) Pirsan LLC, (viii) Trade-Trust LLC, (ix) Elefteria LLC, (x) VKF Satek LLC,(xi) Stemv Group LLC v. The Russian Federation * PJSC Ukrnafta v. The Russian Federation * Stans Energy Corp. and Kutisay Mining LLC v. The KyrgyzRepublic
* Mr. Kristian Almås and Mr. Geir Almås v. The Republicof Poland
* 1. Iberdrola, S.A. (España) 2. Iberdrola Energía, S.A.U. (España) c. El Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia * Financial Performance Holdings B.V. (the Netherlands) v. The Russian Federation * WNC Factoring Limited (United Kingdom) v. The CzechRepublic
* Mytilineos Holdings S.A. (Greece) v. The Republic ofSerbia
* Louis Dreyfus Armateurs SAS (France) v. The Republic ofIndia
* Antaris Solar GmbH (Germany) and Dr. Michael Göde (Germany) v. The Czech Republic * (1) Tenoch Holdings Limited (Cyprus) (2) Mr. Maxim Naumchenko (Russian Federation) (3) Mr. Andrey Poluektov (Russian Federation) v. The Republic of India * Windstream Energy LLC (U.S.A.) v. The Government ofCanada
* South American Silver Limited (Bermuda) v. The Plurinational State of Bolivia * CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd., Devas Employees Mauritius Private Limited, and Telcom Devas Mauritius Limited v. Republic ofIndia
* U.S. Steel Global Holdings I B.V. (The Netherlands) v.The Slovak Republic
* Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government ofCanada
* Ilya Levitis (United States) v. The Kyrgyz Republic * St Marys VCNA, LLC v. Government of Canada * Mesa Power Group LLC (USA) v. Government of Canada * Murphy Exploration & Production Company - International v. The Republic of Ecuador * The PV Investors v. The Kingdom of Spain * OAO Gazprom v. The Republic of Lithuania * Philip Morris Asia Limited (Hong Kong) v. The Commonwealth of Australia * Merck Sharpe & Dohme (I.A.) LLC v. The Republic ofEcuador
* Peter A. Allard (Canada) v. The Government of Barbados * Copper Mesa Mining Corporation (Canada) v. The Republicof Ecuador
* 1. Guaracachi America, Inc. (U.S.A.) & 2. Rurelec plc (United Kingdom) v. Plurinational State of Bolivia * Dunkeld International Investment Limited (Turks & Caicos) v. The Government of Belize * 1. China Heilongjiang International Economic & Technical Cooperative Corp., 2. Beijing Shougang Mining Investment Company Ltd., and 3. Qinhuangdaoshi Qinlong International Industrial Co. Ltd. v.Mongolia
* British Caribbean Bank Ltd. (Turks & Caicos) v. The Government of Belize * European American Investment Bank AG v. The SlovakRepublic
* Dunkeld International Investment Limited (Turks & Caicos) v. The Government of Belize * Melvin J. Howard, Centurion Health Corp. & Howard Family Trust v. The Government of Canada * InterTrade Holding GmbH v. The Czech Republic * HICEE B.V. v. The Slovak Republic * Achmea B.V. (formerly known as “Eureko B.V.”) v. TheSlovak Republic
* 1. TCW Group, Inc. 2. Dominican Energy Holdings, L.P. v. The Dominican Republic * Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada * Chemtura Corporation (formerly Crompton Corporation) v. Government of Canada * Romak S.A. (Switzerland) v. The Republic ofUzbekistan
* 1. Chevron Corporation and 2. Texaco Petroleum Company v. The Republic of Ecuador * 1. Centerra Gold Inc. (Canada) and 2. Kumtor Gold Company (Kyrgyz Republic) v. The Kyrgyz Republic * Veteran Petroleum Limited (Cyprus) v. The RussianFederation
* Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v. TheRussian Federation
* Hulley Enterprises Limited (Cyprus) v. The RussianFederation
* The Eurotunnel Arbitration * Telekom Malaysia Berhad/Government of Ghana * Saluka Investments B.V. v. Czech Republic CONTRACT-BASED ARBITRATIONS * A. v. UN Organization * Gunvor SA (Switzerland) v. The Government of the Republic of Zambia (Ministry of Mines, Energy and Water Development) * International Management Group v. European Union, represented by the European Commission * International Management Group v. European Union, represented by the European Commission * Bangladesh Accord Arbitrations * Mr. Mohamed Ismail Reygal (Somalia) v. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) * D. v. Energy Community * Maynilad Water Services, Inc. (Philippines) v. Republicof the Philippines
* Indian Potash Limited (India) v. Agriculture Inputs Company Limited (Nepal) * District Municipality of La Punta (Peru) v. United Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS) * Sterling Merchant Finance Ltd v. Government of the Republic of Cabo Verde * 1. EcuadorTLC S.A. (Ecuador) 2. Cayman International Exploration Company S.A. (Panamá) 3. Teikoku Oil Ecuador (Islas Caimán) c. 1. República del Ecuador 2. Secretaría de Hidrocarburos del Ecuador 3. Empresa Pública de Hidrocarburos del Ecuador EPPetroecu
* Consorcio John W. Mcdougall Company Inc. y Dredge & Marine Corporation (U.S.A.) v. El Instituto Costarricense de Electricidad (Costa Rica) * Mattioli Joint Venture v. The Ministry of Water and Energy representing the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia * Consta Joint Venture v. Chemin de Fer Djibouto-Ethiopien (the Ethiopian-Djibouti Railway), representing the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia and the Republic of Djibouti * Polis Fondi Immobliare di Banche Popolare S.G.R.p.A v. International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) * Radio Corporation of America v. China CONTRACT-BASED MEDIATIONS/CONCILIATIONS * Consorcio Sogeosa-Tilmon (Costa Rica) c. El Instituto Tecnológico de Costa Rica (Costa Rica)OTHER PROCEEDINGS
* The Government of Sudan / The Sudan People's Liberation Movement/Army (Abyei Arbitration) * Bank for International Settlements * Larsen v. Hawaiian KingdomSEARCH IN CASES
SEARCH IN DOCUMENTS
Advanced search
CASE STATUS
-- All cases -- Concluded PendingTYPE OF CASE
-- All types-- Interstate arbitrations Interstate conciliations Other interstate proceedings Investor-state arbitrations Contract-based arbitrations Contract-based mediations/conciliations Other proceedings NAME(S) OF CLAIMANT(S) NAME(S) OF RESPONDENT(S)NAMES OF PARTIES
CASE NUMBER
ADMINISTERING INSTITUTION -- All -- - Other - Ad hoc Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC) Cairo Regional Center for International Commercial Arbitration (CRCICA) Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC) International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Kuala Lumpur Regional Centre for Commercial Arbitration (RCAKL) London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) SUBJECT MATTER OR ECONOMIC SECTOR -- All -- - Other - Accommodation and food service Administrative and support service Agriculture, forestry and fishing Arts, entertainment and recreation Border delimitation Claims commission Construction Education Electricity/Power Environmental disputes Financial and insurance Human health and social work Information and communication International environmental law International investment law Land border delimitation Law of the sea Manufacturing Maritime boundary delimitation Mining and quarrying Oil and gas Other service Pharmaceutical Post-conflict situations Professional, scientific and technical Real estate Telecommunications Tourism Transportation and storage Treaty interpretation Treaty law Water supply; sewerage, waste management and remediation RULES USED IN ARBITRAL PROCEEDINGS -- All -- - Other - 1899 Convention for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes 1907 Convention for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes Ad Hoc Rules of Procedure Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) Arbitration Rules 2012 Permanent Court of Arbitration Optional Conciliation Rules Permanent Court of Arbitration Optional Rules for Arbitrating Disputes between Two Parties of Which Only One Is a State Permanent Court of Arbitration Optional Rules for Arbitrating Disputes between Two States Permanent Court of Arbitration Optional Rules for Arbitration between International Organizations and Private Parties Permanent Court of Arbitration Optional Rules for Arbitration Involving International Organizations and States Permanent Court of Arbitration Optional Rules for Arbitration of Disputes Relating to Natural Resources and the Environment Permanent Court of Arbitration Optional Rules for Arbitration of Disputes Relating to Outer Space Activities Permanent Court of Arbitration Optional Rules for Conciliation of Disputes Relating to Natural Resources and the Environment Permanent Court of Arbitration Optional Rules for Fact-finding Commissions of Inquiry UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules 1976 UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules 2010 UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules 2013 UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-StateArbitration 2013
PARTIES
-- All claimants -- - N/A - - Other - International organization Private entity State State entity -- All respondents -- - N/A - - Other - International organization Private entity State State entity -- All parties -- - N/A - - Other - International organization Private entity State State entity TREATY OR CONTRACT OF PROCEEDINGS -- All countries -- - N/A - Afghanistan Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Antigua and Barbados Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Chile China Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, Democratic Republic of Costa Rica Côte d Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Fiji Finland France Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guatemala Guinea Guinea Bissau Guyana Haiti Honduras Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Mauritania Mauritius Mexico Micronesia Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Qatar Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Kitts & Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Vincent & the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome & Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Timor-Leste Togo Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe and -- All countries -- - N/A - Afghanistan Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Antigua and Barbados Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Chile China Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, Democratic Republic of Costa Rica Côte d Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Fiji Finland France Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guatemala Guinea Guinea Bissau Guyana Haiti Honduras Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Mauritania Mauritius Mexico Micronesia Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Qatar Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Kitts & Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Vincent & the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome & Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Timor-Leste Togo Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe and/or -- Any type -- Bilateral treaty Multilateral treaty ContractOther
SEAT OF ARBITRATION
-- All countries -- - N/A - Afghanistan Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Antigua and Barbados Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Chile China Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, Democratic Republic of Costa Rica Côte d Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Fiji Finland France Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guatemala Guinea Guinea Bissau Guyana Haiti Honduras Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Mauritania Mauritius Mexico Micronesia Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Qatar Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Kitts & Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Vincent & the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome & Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Timor-Leste Togo Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Yemen Zambia ZimbabweARBITRATOR(S)
REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CLAIMANT(S) REPRESENTATIVES OF THE RESPONDENT(S) REPRESENTATIVES OF THE PARTIES YEAR OF COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGFrom -- Any --
202020192018201720162015201420132012201120102009200820072006200520042003200220012000199919981997199619951994199319921991199019891988198719861985198419831982198119801979197819771976197519741973197219711970196919681967196619651964196319621961196019591958195719561955195419531952195119501949194819471946194519441943194219411940To -- Any --
202020192018201720162015201420132012201120102009200820072006200520042003200220012000199919981997199619951994199319921991199019891988198719861985198419831982198119801979197819771976197519741973197219711970196919681967196619651964196319621961196019591958195719561955195419531952195119501949194819471946194519441943194219411940 YEAR OF ISSUE OF AWARDFrom -- Any --
202020192018201720162015201420132012201120102009200820072006200520042003200220012000199919981997199619951994199319921991199019891988198719861985198419831982198119801979197819771976197519741973197219711970196919681967196619651964196319621961196019591958195719561955195419531952195119501949194819471946194519441943194219411940To -- Any --
202020192018201720162015201420132012201120102009200820072006200520042003200220012000199919981997199619951994199319921991199019891988198719861985198419831982198119801979197819771976197519741973197219711970196919681967196619651964196319621961196019591958195719561955195419531952195119501949194819471946194519441943194219411940 LENGTH OF PROCEEDINGS -- Any -- 1-2 years 2-3 years 3-4 years Less than one year More than 3 years More than 4 years Pending TYPE OF DOCUMENT/FILE -- Any -- Appointing Authority Actions Audio Award or other decision Image Notice of Arbitration Other Press Release Procedural Order Transcript/Minutes Video Written submissionNAVIGATION
* Home
* About us
* Dispute Resolution Services* Cases
* Resources
* External relations*
* FAQ
* Employment
* Contracting Parties LoginCONTACT
Permanent Court of ArbitrationPeace Palace
Carnegieplein 2
2517 KJ The Hague
The Netherlands
T: +31 70 302 4165
F: +31 70 302 4167
E-MAIL: bureau@pca-cpa.orgContact us
FOLLOW US
* Terms of use
* Copyright 2020 - Permanent Court of Arbitration - All rightsreserved
*
Details
Copyright © 2024 ArchiveBay.com. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | DMCA | 2021 | Feedback | Advertising | RSS 2.0