Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
More Annotations
A complete backup of msdhamiblogspotcom.blogspot.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of hospitalitycopywriting.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of careerjet.com.hk
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of cultureshockcollectables.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of fidnru.tumblr.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of enlightenupca.wordpress.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Favourite Annotations
A complete backup of https://gobbc.edu
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://floored.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://nbcpalmsprings.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://essaybox.co.uk
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://backlink-tool.org
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://sporti.dk
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://blackmountainnews.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://mangani1958.it
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://dailydogtag.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://playstationnetwork.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://sqmgroup.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://ahorn-hotels.de
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Text
ROUGH THEORY
Capital seeks to go beyond this awestruck reaction, providing a robust theory of the practical generation of specific historical patterns, while also demonstrating how the same practices that reproduce capital, also reproduce the potential for its emancipatory transformation. Location: The New School, Room 529, 80 Fifth Ave.,NYC.
HOW TO DO THINGS WITH WORDS This makes way for the presentation of what, as I understand it, is the core thesis of ‘speech act theory’. Firstly, there is a presentation of what ‘issuing an utterance’ is: a) the act of uttering noises (the ‘phone’); b) the act of uttering words chosen from a given vocubulary (the ‘pheme’); and c) the act of usingwords to
EXPLAINING RESEARCH PROPOSALS CHOMSKY’S “LANGUAGE AND MIND” In this light, the didactic purpose of the book becomes clear in moving through it: Chomksy is presenting, to different audiences, in more or less technical detail, 3 distinct ideas. Firstly, he presents in a number of guises the idea of universal grammar – where grammar is a set of rules which determine the matching of a given sound to a SEARLE VS. CHOMSKY REPRISED: 30 YEARS ON… Searle vs. Chomsky Reprised: 30 Years On. Folks interested in the Searle-Lakoff-Chomsky exchange discussed below, might also be interested in the following exchange, in which Searle revisits the topic thirty years on. Searle, John (2002) “End of the Revolution” New York Review of Books vol. 49, no. 3, February 28. HABERMAS AND BRANDOM, FACTS AND NORMSINCONVENIENT FACTS
My reading group has been working its way through Wittgenstein - first the Tractatus and now Philosophical Investigations. Along the way, we're also reading some contemporaneous works chosen, according to our somewhat random collective mood, to cast the core text into relief. Last week, I suggested looking at Weber's "Science as a Vocation" - in READING GROUP: GLOBALISED AND HYPERTEXTED I had mentioned previously that the reading group intended to take a break for a month, while two of our members tour the US. At yesterday's meeting, though, we decided that a month was simply too long to go without a substantive (or, depending on your point of view, insubstantial) discussion of linguistics. We've therefore BECOMING THE TEACHERS WE DIDN’T HAVE Like parents who want to spare their children the worst experiences from their own childhoods, academics often choose pedagogical strategies in the hope of sparing their students from their own worst university experiences. A post from See Jane Compute reminded me of this issue. Jane reports: The story of how I teach intro courses has SPAM AS FOUND POETRY Maybe it's just me, but email spam to this domain seems to be getting more poetic lately. The current day's offerings include the intriguingly random: "Order status, off thrown" Some nascent political commentary: "Your money, oil filled" And the haiku-like: "Very sad German statistics say in average" A bit less poetic is the spam thatROUGH THEORY
Capital seeks to go beyond this awestruck reaction, providing a robust theory of the practical generation of specific historical patterns, while also demonstrating how the same practices that reproduce capital, also reproduce the potential for its emancipatory transformation. Location: The New School, Room 529, 80 Fifth Ave.,NYC.
HOW TO DO THINGS WITH WORDS This makes way for the presentation of what, as I understand it, is the core thesis of ‘speech act theory’. Firstly, there is a presentation of what ‘issuing an utterance’ is: a) the act of uttering noises (the ‘phone’); b) the act of uttering words chosen from a given vocubulary (the ‘pheme’); and c) the act of usingwords to
EXPLAINING RESEARCH PROPOSALS CHOMSKY’S “LANGUAGE AND MIND” In this light, the didactic purpose of the book becomes clear in moving through it: Chomksy is presenting, to different audiences, in more or less technical detail, 3 distinct ideas. Firstly, he presents in a number of guises the idea of universal grammar – where grammar is a set of rules which determine the matching of a given sound to a SEARLE VS. CHOMSKY REPRISED: 30 YEARS ON… Searle vs. Chomsky Reprised: 30 Years On. Folks interested in the Searle-Lakoff-Chomsky exchange discussed below, might also be interested in the following exchange, in which Searle revisits the topic thirty years on. Searle, John (2002) “End of the Revolution” New York Review of Books vol. 49, no. 3, February 28. HABERMAS AND BRANDOM, FACTS AND NORMSINCONVENIENT FACTS
My reading group has been working its way through Wittgenstein - first the Tractatus and now Philosophical Investigations. Along the way, we're also reading some contemporaneous works chosen, according to our somewhat random collective mood, to cast the core text into relief. Last week, I suggested looking at Weber's "Science as a Vocation" - in READING GROUP: GLOBALISED AND HYPERTEXTED I had mentioned previously that the reading group intended to take a break for a month, while two of our members tour the US. At yesterday's meeting, though, we decided that a month was simply too long to go without a substantive (or, depending on your point of view, insubstantial) discussion of linguistics. We've therefore BECOMING THE TEACHERS WE DIDN’T HAVE Like parents who want to spare their children the worst experiences from their own childhoods, academics often choose pedagogical strategies in the hope of sparing their students from their own worst university experiences. A post from See Jane Compute reminded me of this issue. Jane reports: The story of how I teach intro courses has SPAM AS FOUND POETRY Maybe it's just me, but email spam to this domain seems to be getting more poetic lately. The current day's offerings include the intriguingly random: "Order status, off thrown" Some nascent political commentary: "Your money, oil filled" And the haiku-like: "Very sad German statistics say in average" A bit less poetic is the spam that SOCIOLOGY AND PSYCHOLOGY I think the film Fight Club leaves little room for doubt about the reality of the destructive fantasy: the heroes of the film fire golf balls through windows, explode corporate edifices, and practice brutality on themselves and each other. In every case there is a noticeable attempt at a sort of erasure of the hegemonic: at the end of the film, the cityscape is empty because all the credit THE AMBIVALENCE OF ORGANISATION I just noticed the following in an article by Kenneth Davidson in The Age Business Day:. It is an inconvenient truth that unionised work forces can contribute to labour productivity by driving up wages faster than non-unionised work forces and this provides a stimulus to innovation, as employers will be motivated to economise on the use of labour by capital substitution. THE FIRST TASTE OF FREEDOM One of the things I’ve been wrestling with, in reading Adorno, is the question of what sorts of spaces, relationships, institutions, etc. might make it more likely that people could “process” what you have called the realisation of betrayal, rather than channeling this experience into denial or anger.THE OUROBOROS
I've recently gotten several questions from people about what "that snake thing" is in the logo for the site. For those who aren't familiar, the site logo is an ouroboros - a serpent eating its own tail. I chose the ouroboros as a logo because I spend a lot of time talking about self-reflexive theory READING GROUP: GLOBALISED AND HYPERTEXTED I had mentioned previously that the reading group intended to take a break for a month, while two of our members tour the US. At yesterday's meeting, though, we decided that a month was simply too long to go without a substantive (or, depending on your point of view, insubstantial) discussion ofACCIDENTAL HISTORY
I've claimed below that Marx is being ironic - or, perhaps more accurately, satirical or burlesque - when he displays forms of analysis that suggest an idealist dialectic playing out in history. One of the reasons I make this claim is that dialectical gestures of this sort are very regularly followed in STAR-CROSSED HEGELIANS I've been buried with work, and haven't been keeping up on my Hegel posting, but will get back to the Science of Logic very soon. In the meantime, two celestial-themed Hegel posts from other sites. Tom over at Grundlegung draws attention to a special double issue of the online, open access journal Cosmos and History, EVERYTHING I NEEDED TO WRITE (THIS WEEK), I’VE WRITTEN AT Since I seem to be spending more time writing over at Acephalous this week, than here at "home", I thought I should provide a link to the thread where I've been posting. My own initial contribution comes fairly late in the piece, but the discussion is still rumbling alongfrom there.
WHEN I UPGRADE, I WANT TO BE… Ouch, indeed 🙂 I guess this is the balance we (esp. scholars) all grapple with. We definitely like to do our thinking, and sometimes that can be a solitary activity, esp. when most social interactions we find are quite, well, co-opted, too pop-culturish (“Let’s go to a bar!” “Let’s go get drunk!” etc.). SPAM AS FOUND POETRY Maybe it's just me, but email spam to this domain seems to be getting more poetic lately. The current day's offerings include the intriguingly random: "Order status, off thrown" Some nascent political commentary: "Your money, oil filled" And the haiku-like: "Very sad German statistics say in average" A bit less poetic is the spam thatROUGH THEORY
So back in Melbourne after attending the Capital Against Capitalism conference in Sydney over the weekend. The event reminded me that I keep meaning to put up the actual submitted version of my doctoral thesis (the version that has been linked under the “Thesis” tab was the penultimate version). THESIS | ROUGH THEORY Disassembling Capital: the submitted version of my doctoral thesis. A number of people have previously read the penultimate version of the thesis, whose chapters have been linked on this page for some time. Those links are below in case anyone has linked to this page, ratherthan
HOW TO DO THINGS WITH WORDS It is true that, as per NP's suggestion, this post has been several times delayed by travel, tiredness and various other excuses. However it is not at all clear that in finally putting together a belated post, an "official" reading will be presented, nor that I will feel "comfortable providing a bit of context" - HEGEL | ROUGH THEORY Hegel Summer Reading Groups For two summers, the reading group focussed on Hegel, reading Phenomenology of Spirit in 2007, and Science of Logic in 2008. The online posts associated with the reading group do not cover the text comprehensively, but instead focus on the interests and concerns of the people writing the post. The Science EXPLAINING RESEARCH PROPOSALSINCONVENIENT FACTS
My reading group has been working its way through Wittgenstein - first the Tractatus and now Philosophical Investigations. Along the way, we're also reading some contemporaneous works chosen, according to our somewhat random collective mood, to cast the core text into relief. Last week, I suggested looking at Weber's "Science as a Vocation" - in INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Posts about Intellectual Property written by N Pepperell CLIFF NOTES TO THE APOCALYPSE I had been intending to write something pointing to the various follow-ups to the discussion on apocalyptic social movements that originally started, and has continued, as a kind of conversational flow across various blogs. I discovered this morning, though, that High Low & in between has assembled an extraordinary summary of the discussion - complete THE FIRST TASTE OF FREEDOM One of the things I’ve been wrestling with, in reading Adorno, is the question of what sorts of spaces, relationships, institutions, etc. might make it more likely that people could “process” what you have called the realisation of betrayal, rather than channeling this experience into denial or anger. SEARLE VS. CHOMSKY REPRISED: 30 YEARS ON… Folks interested in the Searle-Lakoff-Chomsky exchange discussed below, might also be interested in the following exchange, in which Searle revisits the topic thirty years on. Searle, John (2002) "End of the Revolution" New York Review of Books vol. 49, no. 3, February 28. Bromberger, Sylvain (2002) "Chomsky's Revolution" New York Review ofBooks vol. 49,
ROUGH THEORY
So back in Melbourne after attending the Capital Against Capitalism conference in Sydney over the weekend. The event reminded me that I keep meaning to put up the actual submitted version of my doctoral thesis (the version that has been linked under the “Thesis” tab was the penultimate version). THESIS | ROUGH THEORY Disassembling Capital: the submitted version of my doctoral thesis. A number of people have previously read the penultimate version of the thesis, whose chapters have been linked on this page for some time. Those links are below in case anyone has linked to this page, ratherthan
HOW TO DO THINGS WITH WORDS It is true that, as per NP's suggestion, this post has been several times delayed by travel, tiredness and various other excuses. However it is not at all clear that in finally putting together a belated post, an "official" reading will be presented, nor that I will feel "comfortable providing a bit of context" - HEGEL | ROUGH THEORY Hegel Summer Reading Groups For two summers, the reading group focussed on Hegel, reading Phenomenology of Spirit in 2007, and Science of Logic in 2008. The online posts associated with the reading group do not cover the text comprehensively, but instead focus on the interests and concerns of the people writing the post. The Science EXPLAINING RESEARCH PROPOSALSINCONVENIENT FACTS
My reading group has been working its way through Wittgenstein - first the Tractatus and now Philosophical Investigations. Along the way, we're also reading some contemporaneous works chosen, according to our somewhat random collective mood, to cast the core text into relief. Last week, I suggested looking at Weber's "Science as a Vocation" - in INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Posts about Intellectual Property written by N Pepperell CLIFF NOTES TO THE APOCALYPSE I had been intending to write something pointing to the various follow-ups to the discussion on apocalyptic social movements that originally started, and has continued, as a kind of conversational flow across various blogs. I discovered this morning, though, that High Low & in between has assembled an extraordinary summary of the discussion - complete THE FIRST TASTE OF FREEDOM One of the things I’ve been wrestling with, in reading Adorno, is the question of what sorts of spaces, relationships, institutions, etc. might make it more likely that people could “process” what you have called the realisation of betrayal, rather than channeling this experience into denial or anger. SEARLE VS. CHOMSKY REPRISED: 30 YEARS ON… Folks interested in the Searle-Lakoff-Chomsky exchange discussed below, might also be interested in the following exchange, in which Searle revisits the topic thirty years on. Searle, John (2002) "End of the Revolution" New York Review of Books vol. 49, no. 3, February 28. Bromberger, Sylvain (2002) "Chomsky's Revolution" New York Review ofBooks vol. 49,
THESIS | ROUGH THEORY Disassembling Capital: the submitted version of my doctoral thesis. A number of people have previously read the penultimate version of the thesis, whose chapters have been linked on this page for some time. Those links are below in case anyone has linked to this page, ratherthan
HEGEL | ROUGH THEORY Hegel Summer Reading Groups For two summers, the reading group focussed on Hegel, reading Phenomenology of Spirit in 2007, and Science of Logic in 2008. The online posts associated with the reading group do not cover the text comprehensively, but instead focus on the interests and concerns of the people writing the post. The Science THESIS PROBLEM OF THE DAY I have this section of my thesis that is effectively homeless. Or at least peripatetic. I keep moving it around from place to place. Internally, it's fine. It does its job. It reads okay. But it's like a picture hanging on a wall that is always just slightly out of kilter -everywhere I try
THE DEVIL’S DIALECTIC And as long as I’m posting A tiny bit of new content, excerpted from something I’ve been writing offline Roger has been writing on Marx and Faust recently – so a quick riff on the passage in chapter two of Capital where the text explicitly invokes him This passage mocks the perspective that has, just previously in this chapter, been occupying Capital‘s main stage. EMOTICON | ROUGH THEORY My three-year-old son often tells me stories about his day when I pick him up from "school". There's a somewhat random relationship between the stories and anything that might actually have happened. Sometimes he'll tell me something that happened at some point in the past, but not that day. Sometimes he'll retell a story that PHENOMENOLOGY OF SPIRIT Posts about Phenomenology of Spirit written by N Pepperell. I will put up a proper version of this paper on the Marx & Philosophy Society website soon. I just wanted to post the text of the actual talk here for archiving purposes in the interim.ACCIDENTAL HISTORY
I've claimed below that Marx is being ironic - or, perhaps more accurately, satirical or burlesque - when he displays forms of analysis that suggest an idealist dialectic playing out in history. One of the reasons I make this claim is that dialectical gestures of this sort are very regularly followed inTRAGEDY OR HOPE
The things you find when putting together course materials I was trawling through the Internet Archive, trying to find some short video material on postwar history that I could use to illustrate some points for the planning theory class.And of course I couldn’t help but get distracted when one of my searches pulled up: Tragedy or Hope: Educating 1960s campus protesters as to “what’s JUNE | 2006 | ROUGH THEORY I’ve blogged previously about the perverse difficulties I’ve been having obtaining a copy of Adorno’s “Sociology and Psychology”. I could of course do something smart like actually paying for a copy of the article from the journal that published it, but it’s not that urgent, and our interlibrary loan folks are normally very efficient.. I followed up on the issue again the other day APRIL | 2010 | ROUGH THEORY 1 post published by N Pepperell during April 2010. Updated 11 June – just to say that my ill-at-ease reaction to the partial resolution to the Middlesex situation has been posted in the comments over at Perverse Egalitarianism.. Just signal boosting the bizarre story most of you will have already seen on other theory blogs, about the inexplicable decision by Middlesex University to cut itsROUGH THEORY
Capital seeks to go beyond this awestruck reaction, providing a robust theory of the practical generation of specific historical patterns, while also demonstrating how the same practices that reproduce capital, also reproduce the potential for its emancipatory transformation. Location: The New School, Room 529, 80 Fifth Ave.,NYC.
HOW TO DO THINGS WITH WORDS This makes way for the presentation of what, as I understand it, is the core thesis of ‘speech act theory’. Firstly, there is a presentation of what ‘issuing an utterance’ is: a) the act of uttering noises (the ‘phone’); b) the act of uttering words chosen from a given vocubulary (the ‘pheme’); and c) the act of usingwords to
CHOMSKY’S “LANGUAGE AND MIND” In this light, the didactic purpose of the book becomes clear in moving through it: Chomksy is presenting, to different audiences, in more or less technical detail, 3 distinct ideas. Firstly, he presents in a number of guises the idea of universal grammar – where grammar is a set of rules which determine the matching of a given sound to a EXPLAINING RESEARCH PROPOSALS SELF-REFLEXIVITY BEYOND THE SELF So of course I’ve been thinking about the recent conversations on self-reflexivity, at Larval Subjects and Now-Times – and, specifically, thinking about my own tendency to take a term that has quite a long-standing history (as the Now-Times’ post so elegantly demonstrated) and use the term in a somewhat perverse and idiosyncratic way. Now-Times pointed the notion of self-reflexivityback
SEARLE VS. CHOMSKY REPRISED: 30 YEARS ON… Searle vs. Chomsky Reprised: 30 Years On. Folks interested in the Searle-Lakoff-Chomsky exchange discussed below, might also be interested in the following exchange, in which Searle revisits the topic thirty years on. Searle, John (2002) “End of the Revolution” New York Review of Books vol. 49, no. 3, February 28.INCONVENIENT FACTS
My reading group has been working its way through Wittgenstein - first the Tractatus and now Philosophical Investigations. Along the way, we're also reading some contemporaneous works chosen, according to our somewhat random collective mood, to cast the core text into relief. Last week, I suggested looking at Weber's "Science as a Vocation" - inRE-READING GROUP
So the reading group reassembled for a planning meeting a couple of days ago, deciding what we'd like to do now that everyone is back in Melbourne - particularly given that preparation for the coming term and other practical obligations will be interfering with all of our schedules for the next several weeks. The blog ARE WE HUMAN? OR ARE WE DANCER? So I was driving somewhere with my five-year-old son on Saturday night. The car paused at a stoplight long enough for him to look out the window at a large crowd of people, dressed for dancing and waiting for a tram to the city. Most were female, which caused my son toremark: "There are
SPAM AS FOUND POETRY Maybe it's just me, but email spam to this domain seems to be getting more poetic lately. The current day's offerings include the intriguingly random: "Order status, off thrown" Some nascent political commentary: "Your money, oil filled" And the haiku-like: "Very sad German statistics say in average" A bit less poetic is the spam thatROUGH THEORY
Capital seeks to go beyond this awestruck reaction, providing a robust theory of the practical generation of specific historical patterns, while also demonstrating how the same practices that reproduce capital, also reproduce the potential for its emancipatory transformation. Location: The New School, Room 529, 80 Fifth Ave.,NYC.
HOW TO DO THINGS WITH WORDS This makes way for the presentation of what, as I understand it, is the core thesis of ‘speech act theory’. Firstly, there is a presentation of what ‘issuing an utterance’ is: a) the act of uttering noises (the ‘phone’); b) the act of uttering words chosen from a given vocubulary (the ‘pheme’); and c) the act of usingwords to
CHOMSKY’S “LANGUAGE AND MIND” In this light, the didactic purpose of the book becomes clear in moving through it: Chomksy is presenting, to different audiences, in more or less technical detail, 3 distinct ideas. Firstly, he presents in a number of guises the idea of universal grammar – where grammar is a set of rules which determine the matching of a given sound to a EXPLAINING RESEARCH PROPOSALS SELF-REFLEXIVITY BEYOND THE SELF So of course I’ve been thinking about the recent conversations on self-reflexivity, at Larval Subjects and Now-Times – and, specifically, thinking about my own tendency to take a term that has quite a long-standing history (as the Now-Times’ post so elegantly demonstrated) and use the term in a somewhat perverse and idiosyncratic way. Now-Times pointed the notion of self-reflexivityback
SEARLE VS. CHOMSKY REPRISED: 30 YEARS ON… Searle vs. Chomsky Reprised: 30 Years On. Folks interested in the Searle-Lakoff-Chomsky exchange discussed below, might also be interested in the following exchange, in which Searle revisits the topic thirty years on. Searle, John (2002) “End of the Revolution” New York Review of Books vol. 49, no. 3, February 28.INCONVENIENT FACTS
My reading group has been working its way through Wittgenstein - first the Tractatus and now Philosophical Investigations. Along the way, we're also reading some contemporaneous works chosen, according to our somewhat random collective mood, to cast the core text into relief. Last week, I suggested looking at Weber's "Science as a Vocation" - inRE-READING GROUP
So the reading group reassembled for a planning meeting a couple of days ago, deciding what we'd like to do now that everyone is back in Melbourne - particularly given that preparation for the coming term and other practical obligations will be interfering with all of our schedules for the next several weeks. The blog ARE WE HUMAN? OR ARE WE DANCER? So I was driving somewhere with my five-year-old son on Saturday night. The car paused at a stoplight long enough for him to look out the window at a large crowd of people, dressed for dancing and waiting for a tram to the city. Most were female, which caused my son toremark: "There are
SPAM AS FOUND POETRY Maybe it's just me, but email spam to this domain seems to be getting more poetic lately. The current day's offerings include the intriguingly random: "Order status, off thrown" Some nascent political commentary: "Your money, oil filled" And the haiku-like: "Very sad German statistics say in average" A bit less poetic is the spam that HEGEL | ROUGH THEORY Hegel Summer Reading Groups For two summers, the reading group focussed on Hegel, reading Phenomenology of Spirit in 2007, and Science of Logic in 2008. The online posts associated with the reading group do not cover the text comprehensively, but instead focus on the interests and concerns of the people writing the post. The Science THE AMBIVALENCE OF ORGANISATION I just noticed the following in an article by Kenneth Davidson in The Age Business Day:. It is an inconvenient truth that unionised work forces can contribute to labour productivity by driving up wages faster than non-unionised work forces and this provides a stimulus to innovation, as employers will be motivated to economise on the use of labour by capital substitution. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Posts about Intellectual Property written by N Pepperell READING GROUP: GLOBALISED AND HYPERTEXTED I had mentioned previously that the reading group intended to take a break for a month, while two of our members tour the US. At yesterday's meeting, though, we decided that a month was simply too long to go without a substantive (or, depending on your point of view, insubstantial) discussion of linguistics. We've therefore CLIFF NOTES TO THE APOCALYPSE Cliff Notes to the Apocalypse. 1 Comment Posted by N Pepperell on January 21, 2007. I had been intending to write something pointing to the various follow-ups to the discussion on apocalyptic social movements that originally started, and has continued, as a kind of conversational flow across various blogs. I discovered this morning,though
NOTES TO SELF
I recently received an urgent request from a reader for a copy of an article I had discussed on the blog some months ago. The article is in fact quite difficult to find - the reading group had trouble sourcing it - and so I was happy to help out. I offered to scan and ARE WE HUMAN? OR ARE WE DANCER? So I was driving somewhere with my five-year-old son on Saturday night. The car paused at a stoplight long enough for him to look out the window at a large crowd of people, dressed for dancing and waiting for a tram to the city. Most were female, which caused my son toremark: "There are
SOME UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE My favourite quotation this term from a student essay: The great post war economic boom had a positive effect on economic activity as population sizes increased, creating demand for the need to understand German theorists. You know you've been talking about Habermas too much, when your students start drawing conclusions like this DON’T MENTION THE WAR Sarapen and I were just discussing the other day our mutually vague relationship to the war over “theory” that periodically ebbs and flows across various blogs we lurk. I commented that it made me feel somewhat of an inadequate ethnographer, that I couldn’t seem to get a better feel for this dispute – a comment that already suggests that I experience myself in a strange side-on EVERYTHING I NEEDED TO WRITE (THIS WEEK), I’VE WRITTEN AT Since I seem to be spending more time writing over at Acephalous this week, than here at "home", I thought I should provide a link to the thread where I've been posting. My own initial contribution comes fairly late in the piece, but the discussion is still rumbling alongfrom there.
ROUGH THEORY
Capital seeks to go beyond this awestruck reaction, providing a robust theory of the practical generation of specific historical patterns, while also demonstrating how the same practices that reproduce capital, also reproduce the potential for its emancipatory transformation. Location: The New School, Room 529, 80 Fifth Ave.,NYC.
THESIS | ROUGH THEORY Disassembling Capital: the submitted version of my doctoral thesis. A number of people have previously read the penultimate version of the thesis, whose chapters have been linked on this page for some time. Those links are below in case anyone has linked to this page, ratherthan
HOW TO DO THINGS WITH WORDS This makes way for the presentation of what, as I understand it, is the core thesis of ‘speech act theory’. Firstly, there is a presentation of what ‘issuing an utterance’ is: a) the act of uttering noises (the ‘phone’); b) the act of uttering words chosen from a given vocubulary (the ‘pheme’); and c) the act of usingwords to
HEGEL | ROUGH THEORY Hegel Summer Reading Groups For two summers, the reading group focussed on Hegel, reading Phenomenology of Spirit in 2007, and Science of Logic in 2008. The online posts associated with the reading group do not cover the text comprehensively, but instead focus on the interests and concerns of the people writing the post. The Science EXPLAINING RESEARCH PROPOSALS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Posts about Intellectual Property written by N Pepperell THE FIRST TASTE OF FREEDOM One of the things I’ve been wrestling with, in reading Adorno, is the question of what sorts of spaces, relationships, institutions, etc. might make it more likely that people could “process” what you have called the realisation of betrayal, rather than channeling this experience into denial or anger. CLIFF NOTES TO THE APOCALYPSE Cliff Notes to the Apocalypse. 1 Comment Posted by N Pepperell on January 21, 2007. I had been intending to write something pointing to the various follow-ups to the discussion on apocalyptic social movements that originally started, and has continued, as a kind of conversational flow across various blogs. I discovered this morning,though
INCONVENIENT FACTS
My reading group has been working its way through Wittgenstein - first the Tractatus and now Philosophical Investigations. Along the way, we're also reading some contemporaneous works chosen, according to our somewhat random collective mood, to cast the core text into relief. Last week, I suggested looking at Weber's "Science as a Vocation" - in SEARLE VS. CHOMSKY REPRISED: 30 YEARS ON… Searle vs. Chomsky Reprised: 30 Years On. Folks interested in the Searle-Lakoff-Chomsky exchange discussed below, might also be interested in the following exchange, in which Searle revisits the topic thirty years on. Searle, John (2002) “End of the Revolution” New York Review of Books vol. 49, no. 3, February 28.ROUGH THEORY
Capital seeks to go beyond this awestruck reaction, providing a robust theory of the practical generation of specific historical patterns, while also demonstrating how the same practices that reproduce capital, also reproduce the potential for its emancipatory transformation. Location: The New School, Room 529, 80 Fifth Ave.,NYC.
THESIS | ROUGH THEORY Disassembling Capital: the submitted version of my doctoral thesis. A number of people have previously read the penultimate version of the thesis, whose chapters have been linked on this page for some time. Those links are below in case anyone has linked to this page, ratherthan
HOW TO DO THINGS WITH WORDS This makes way for the presentation of what, as I understand it, is the core thesis of ‘speech act theory’. Firstly, there is a presentation of what ‘issuing an utterance’ is: a) the act of uttering noises (the ‘phone’); b) the act of uttering words chosen from a given vocubulary (the ‘pheme’); and c) the act of usingwords to
HEGEL | ROUGH THEORY Hegel Summer Reading Groups For two summers, the reading group focussed on Hegel, reading Phenomenology of Spirit in 2007, and Science of Logic in 2008. The online posts associated with the reading group do not cover the text comprehensively, but instead focus on the interests and concerns of the people writing the post. The Science EXPLAINING RESEARCH PROPOSALS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Posts about Intellectual Property written by N Pepperell THE FIRST TASTE OF FREEDOM One of the things I’ve been wrestling with, in reading Adorno, is the question of what sorts of spaces, relationships, institutions, etc. might make it more likely that people could “process” what you have called the realisation of betrayal, rather than channeling this experience into denial or anger. CLIFF NOTES TO THE APOCALYPSE Cliff Notes to the Apocalypse. 1 Comment Posted by N Pepperell on January 21, 2007. I had been intending to write something pointing to the various follow-ups to the discussion on apocalyptic social movements that originally started, and has continued, as a kind of conversational flow across various blogs. I discovered this morning,though
INCONVENIENT FACTS
My reading group has been working its way through Wittgenstein - first the Tractatus and now Philosophical Investigations. Along the way, we're also reading some contemporaneous works chosen, according to our somewhat random collective mood, to cast the core text into relief. Last week, I suggested looking at Weber's "Science as a Vocation" - in SEARLE VS. CHOMSKY REPRISED: 30 YEARS ON… Searle vs. Chomsky Reprised: 30 Years On. Folks interested in the Searle-Lakoff-Chomsky exchange discussed below, might also be interested in the following exchange, in which Searle revisits the topic thirty years on. Searle, John (2002) “End of the Revolution” New York Review of Books vol. 49, no. 3, February 28.MARX | ROUGH THEORY
This page consolidates the list of posts related to Capital, volume 1, that I have been preparing as part of the draft work for the thesis. Many posts on Marx are therefore not included here - only those that were written as part of the process of working out the thesis argument. Note that a HEGEL | ROUGH THEORY Hegel Summer Reading Groups For two summers, the reading group focussed on Hegel, reading Phenomenology of Spirit in 2007, and Science of Logic in 2008. The online posts associated with the reading group do not cover the text comprehensively, but instead focus on the interests and concerns of the people writing the post. The Science SOCIOLOGY AND PSYCHOLOGY I think the film Fight Club leaves little room for doubt about the reality of the destructive fantasy: the heroes of the film fire golf balls through windows, explode corporate edifices, and practice brutality on themselves and each other. In every case there is a noticeable attempt at a sort of erasure of the hegemonic: at the end of the film, the cityscape is empty because all the credit CHOMSKY’S “LANGUAGE AND MIND” In this light, the didactic purpose of the book becomes clear in moving through it: Chomksy is presenting, to different audiences, in more or less technical detail, 3 distinct ideas. Firstly, he presents in a number of guises the idea of universal grammar – where grammar is a set of rules which determine the matching of a given sound to aBECOMING THEORY
I'm still drowning, with no time for substantive posting, but I wanted to put up a pointer to a post over at Larval Subjects. Sinthome picks up on some of the themes from our longstanding conversation around what difference it might make, for understanding the process of social reproduction and the possibility for transformation, when PHENOMENOLOGY OF SPIRIT Posts about Phenomenology of Spirit written by N Pepperell. I will put up a proper version of this paper on the Marx & Philosophy Society website soon. I just wanted to post the text of the actual talk here for archiving purposes in the interim.OVERSTIMULATION
I should be clearer with my terms: I don’t think it’s utopian at all to believe there are other possibilities. I tend to use the term “utopian” to distinguish approaches that are pitched too abstractly – that point to some very general human inability to be completely subsumed by any form of domination, for example, as the explanation for why critique and transformative social change JUNE | 2006 | ROUGH THEORY I’ve blogged previously about the perverse difficulties I’ve been having obtaining a copy of Adorno’s “Sociology and Psychology”. I could of course do something smart like actually paying for a copy of the article from the journal that published it, but it’s not that urgent, and our interlibrary loan folks are normally very efficient.. I followed up on the issue again the other day WE ARE A MILLION IN THE STREETS. WHY SHOULD WE GO HOME I was looking up some material on May '68 this evening - Marxists Internet Archive has a wonderful eyewitness account, particularly sensitive to the details of how various formal working class "representatives" behaved during the uprisings. It's a story, among other things, of attempted control of the events by various organisers- and of the
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN “BEING” AND “APPEARING TO BE” AN The Difference Between “Being” and “Appearing to Be” an “Objective Social Relation”. Leave a comment Posted by N Pepperell on February 23, 2008. So I submitted the following abstract for a conference, and have had the abstract accepted: When Georg Lukács situates Marx’s argument about commodity fetishism, on the terrainof a
* Home
* About
* Hegel
* Marx
* Thesis
ROUGH THEORY
Theory In The Rough
Home
UNCOMFORTABLE SCIENCELeave a comment
Posted by N Pepperell onJuly 21, 2011
I’ll be posting over at a new blog from this point – this one will stay online as an archive of the thesis project… Explanations in the introductory post at the new site – will hopefully be getting some additional content up over there soon…Advertisements
Powered by wordads.co Thank you for submitting the report!Seen ad many times
Not relevant
Offensive
Covers content
Broken
Report this ad
Advertisements
Powered by wordads.co Thank you for submitting the report!Seen ad many times
Not relevant
Offensive
Covers content
Broken
Report this ad
Blogging
CAPITAL AGAINST CAPITALISM6 Comments
Posted by N Pepperell onJune 28, 2011
So back in Melbourne after attending the Capital Against Capitalism conference in Sydney over the weekend. The event reminded me that I keep meaning to put up the actual submitted version of my doctoral thesis (the version that has been linked under the “Thesis” tab was the penultimate version). The submitted version of the thesis contains a number of changes, clarifications and improvements on the penultimate version, particularly in the chapters on the fetish character of the commodity, and in the discussion of _Capital_ chapter 2, that will hopefully be a bit easier to read andunderstand.
The book will offer a much more substantial revision of this text, based on what I’ve learned from examiners’ comments, reviewers’ comments on the book manuscript, and the comments of many people who have listed to talks I’ve given since submitting the thesis, where I have been trying out alternative approaches to presenting the basic argument. Among other things, the book will approach the issue of Marx’s relationship to Hegel a bit differently – drawing out more clearly the way in which the achitectonic of _Capital_ as a whole recurrently presents, and then undermines, idealist dialectical presentations – putting these presentations forward, only to undermine them a short while later with much more contingent historical explanations of the same phenomena previously presented idealistically. At the same time, I’ll focus even more strongly on Marx’s humour and the importance of understanding his humour if we want to unpack his argument – how much the work turns on vulgar restagings of the grand and elevated themes of the grandest and most elevated theory and philosophy of Marx’s own time. Although the book will still focus on these same early chapters, I’ll try to give a much clearer sense of how this sort of argument plays out at the level of the whole of volume 1 than I was able to do in the thesis. And I’ll discuss in a much more systematic way the relationship between this reinterpretation and the interpretations of major figures such as Lukács, Rubin, and Sohn-Rethel, using these discussions to develop more clearly than I think I do in the thesis, the stakes of theargument.
But until that’s in the world, I thought I should at least toss the final version of the thesis out… Capital v.1 , Events, Fetish
, Materialism
, Philosophy of History, Political
Economy
MEANDERS
9 Comments
Posted by N Pepperell onFebruary 6, 2011
Over the next few weeks, I’ll be meandering around, given talks at the following events in the UK and the US. Perhaps I’ll see some ofyou there…
18 FEBRUARY – LONDON – BIRKBECK: 6:30-8:00 P.M. I’ll be giving a talk to the _Capital_ reading group that meets fortnightly at Birkbeck. They are currently working on chapter 19 of volume 1, so my talk will involve a bit of regression for the group. I’ll be focusing on the opening chapters of _Capital_, as I have on the blog, trying to present a bit more systematically on how an appreciation of Marx’s presentational strategy can clarify how Marx understands the reproduction of emancipatory possibilities as an integral aspect of the reproduction of capital. If anyone is interested in attending – or would just like to know more about the reading group – please email samdolbear @ gmail.com for more information. The exact location of the talk will depend on the numbers expressing an interest in attending, and will be announcedcloser to the date.
22 FEBRUARY – NEW YORK – NEW SCHOOL: 6:00-8:00 P.M. I’ll be giving this talk as part of the NSSR/Lang Speaker Series, organised by the Political Theory Colloquium at the New School. My focus will again be on Marx’s presentational strategy – specifically, his sardonic sense of humour – and on the ways in which many passages in _Capital_ that are often read “straight”, should instead be read as burlesque parodies of political economic theories. Political economy, for Marx, stops short in awe at the complex patterns generated by the reproduction of capital – assuming that intelligibility implies Reason, beneficence, or efficiency. _Capital_ seeks to go beyond this awestruck reaction, providing a robust theory of the practical generation of specific historical patterns, while also demonstrating how the same practices that reproduce capital, also reproduce the potential for its emancipatorytransformation.
Location: The New School, Room 529, 80 Fifth Ave., NYC It’s possible to RSVP via Facebook here: http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=108644742545196, although it’s also okay to show up on the night without having registered. The event is
free.
24-26 FEBRUARY – COLLEGE STATION – TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY As I’ve mentioned previouslyon the
blog, the Society for Social and Political Philosophy is organising a Roundtable on Marx’s _Capital_, with an eye to new readings, and new readers, of Marx. The event is open and free to all, and the format encourages in-depth presentations and discussions. Location: Bolton Hall, Texas A&M Campus For more information contact: Texas A&M Philosophy Department, (979) 845-5660. The event schedule is available online.
Events
EGYPT – SIGNAL BOOSTLeave a comment
Posted by N Pepperell onFebruary 1, 2011
Just reposting the link to a blog set up by regular commenter John, which has been publishing content from the uprising in Egypt . As of the present moment, the internet connection that had been enabling updates has been cut off, but the following was phoned in: > Tomorrow we will march on the palace>
> The last remaining internet connection in Cairo (the one we have > been using to update this blog) has just been shut down (11pm > Egyptian time). Sources say all the mobile phone lines will again be > cut off tonight.>
> But despite the media blackout a million man march has been > organized for 9am tomorrow morning, from Tahrir square to the > presidential palace.>
> Spirits remain high, everyone knows that the time of this regime is> over.
>
> – Phoned in from Cairo, 11:10pmCurrent Events ,
Social Movements ,
Transformation
CFP: CAPITAL AGAINST CAPITALISMLeave a comment
Posted by N Pepperell onJanuary 27, 2011
Hey folks – sorry that I am again leaving comments hanging – trying to make the most of an extremely brief break for writing. I did want to post the attached call for papers, for the event _Capital_against capitalism
:
a conference of new Marxist research, to be held in Sydney on 25 June2011.
More soon…
***
– CALL FOR PAPERS – CALL FOR PAPERS – CALL FOR PAPERS – Capital Against Capitalism a conference of new Marxist research Saturday 25 June 2011Central Sydney
It seems significant, and hardly coincidental, that the impasse that politics fell into after the 1960s and 1970s coincided with the eclipse of Marx and the research project of historical materialism. Social democracy, various left-wing melancholies and/ or the embrace of dead political forms has stood-in for these absent names. Returning to Marx, to Capital and to the various traditions tied-up with these names may present a way to cut across this three-fold deadlock. We invite papers responding to contemporary politics from a range of historical materialist perspectives. We want to bring together the theoretical discussions and debates occurring in Capital reading groups, PhD study circles, and Marxist political organisations and networks. Our conjuncture – its manifold crisis – urges new analyses, new strategic orientations and the engagement of activists and academics alike on these questions. Conference structure The conference will involve two plenaries and four workshops. There will be space for 12 workshop papers about, or connected to, the conference theme. We are happy to receive proposals for themed workshops of three papers, with the caveat that we may need to alter suggested panels or reject individual papers to ensure overalltimetabling.
In our opening plenary, Rick Kuhn will overview the argument of his new book, with Tom Bramble, Labor’s conflict: big business, workers and the politics of class (Cambridge University Press, 2010). Geoff Robinson and Tad Tietze will act as respondents. The final session will be a keynote address from Nicole Pepperell on the key ideas ofher PhD thesis.
In all sessions there will be time for contributions from conference participants. To maximise discussion at the conference, each first plenary and workshop speaker will have 15 minutes to overview theirpaper.
Proposals for papers Proposals for papers should be submitted by 15 March 2011 to Elizabeth Humphrys (lizhumphrys me.com) and Jonathon Collerson (jonathoncollerson gmail.com). Authors should also indicate whether they would be submitting a written paper for refereeing. Papers should be 1500, and no longer than 1800 words. Refereed conference papers will be published, potentially also as a special issue of an academic journal. We reserve the right to reject papers if we have too many to fill the allocated slots, or they are deemed unsuitable, but we will do our best to accommodate everyone.Key Dates
1 February – Call for papers 15 March – Abstracts due 1 May – Papers due for refereeing; conference timetable released 1 June – Feedback to authors 25 June – ConferenceOther details
The conference will be held in Central Sydney, in easy reach of public transport and in an accessible location. There will be a small conference fee, of approximately $20-$30 on average, to cover the cost of lunches and travel costs for the interstate speakers. Full details to follow. If you require childcare please contact us to discuss this by 1 June 2011. The conference organisers will not be arranging billeting, but please contact us if you are unable to arrange your own accommodation option. As the conference has no outside funding source, we will be unable to cover travel costs for workshop presenters.Book , Events
, Marxes
INDIRECTION
4 Comments
Posted by N Pepperell onJanuary 8, 2011
In an indirect and incomplete way, some of the questions currently hanging in the comments here, I’ve addressed – sleepily – in a comment over at Nate’s…
Rather than spreading the discussion across two sites, I thought I’d just post a pointer over there… Eventually (soon?), I’ll try to take up some of these issues over here… Abstraction , Capitalv.1 , Conversations
, Marxes
, Metatheory
, Philosophy of History, Political
Economy , Social
Movements ,
Transformation
HANGING COMMENTS
Leave a comment
Posted
by N Pepperell on January6, 2011
Just wanted to apologise to everyone for whom I’ve left comments hanging. I’ve got a brutal work schedule at the moment, and am also moving house, which has disrupted my net access considerably, so I’ve been online only for essentials. I’m hoping the net access issue will be resolved in the next week, and the work demands should also calm down as well, at least in relative terms… Blogging , ProfessionalLife
STAKES
6 Comments
Posted by N Pepperell onNovember 21, 2010
I’m mired in the selection process at the moment, but couldn’t resist replying (too) quickly to john’s comment under the Is SlaveryCapitalist?
post
below, which was itself a response to a discussion of this issue overat Nate’s
.
I realised after posting that I should really lift the exchange to a more visible place, particularly given that I’m unlikely to be generating other content this week to draw any attention to the blog… So – john’s comment first, and my response below, with apologies that I’ve not at all fully addressed the points john hasraised…
> john wrote:
> After having abandoned the discussion over at Nate’s I see it’s > popped up over here as well. That’s very satisfying, as these are > my two favorite blogs.>
> I’ll try to summarize what would have been my response to Nate > (sorry Nate for not getting back to you, i fell into disuse for a > couple of months). I’m basically not sure what’s really at stake > in the question of whether slavery is capitalist. In my experience > arguments between Marxists about what is and what isn’t capitalist > tend to become fights over different definitions of capitalism that > can be extracted from Marx, but since Marx clearly never provided a > definitive definition such arguments tend to have an irresolvable > quality at best, and at worst become a matter of racking up > quotations on either side. My worry is that in all these > definitional disputes the actual historical object of enquiry > (whether it be slavery, or wage-labor based production, or indeed > global trade) gets lost.>
> So when NP defines capitalism as “a global system, effecting > global forms of compulsion – and effecting this compulsion > precisely in and through a range of apparently contradictory > practices playing out in various regions, through apparently > dissimilar forms of everyday practice on the ground” – my > inclination is to just to say, well that seems like an extremely > broad definition, which would tend to push the origin of capitalism > pretty far back in history, and even potentially apply to some > ancient “global” systems, but whatever, I’ll roll with it. But > the point is that there is no necessary relation between this > definition and all those non-linear “trends” that Marx > identifies in Capital (I’m assuming that “a range of apparently > contradictory practices” is not meant to be synonymous with those > specific trends). So that if we are to accept this definition then > we need to come up with another term or set of terms for specifying > to what extent those specific trends are applicable in any > particular social arrangement of production/reproduction. My > argument is that most of the trends Marx identifies in Capital do > not apply in “societies” or regions dominated by chattel > slavery. Thus for instance the tendency for social labor to be > mediated by the exchange of commodities does not apply since the > slaves do not exchange anything and their labor is not redistributed > automatically by the market, but only by the command of the > slave-owner who is partially insulated from competition in respect > to his allocation of labor (because it is not simply an input, but > also an asset for him). This also means that there is no simple > reproduction in slavery, and no tendency for necessary labor to be > reduced to a minimum, because the slave (because it is an asset) > will be supplied with food whether he/she produces or not, and is in > this respect not dispossessed, and under no compulsion from the > relations of production themselves (and must thus be directly > compelled by physical force). Last but not least, there is also no > tendency in chattel slavery to replace labor with machinery (no > rising org. composition), since it is not easy for the slave owner > to expel labor from the production process (due to transaction > costs), and the resulting endemic problem of surplus labor is most > efficiently resolved by diversifying output rather than > specializing. All of these points are made by Marx in the Results. I > agree that it is probably wrong (and of little import) to say that > because these tendencies don’t apply under chattel slavery that > chattel slavery is not capitalist. But then we still need a > theoretical vocabulary to refer to this non-application of > tendencies which Marx thought were central to the history of the > CMP. I’ve toyed with the idea of saying chattel slavery is > “formal subsumption” but that doesn’t seem to really work. Any> ideas?
>
> Saturday, 20/11/2010 at 6:38 am > N Pepperell wrote: > Hey john – good to see you again I’ll have to apologise > that this may not be a very thorough response – I’m in disuse a > bit myself at the moment, working on a selection-related deadline, > so my time online is very constricted right now…>
> In terms of the stakes: yes, this sort of question is generally > approached either from a historian’s perspective – how far back > can we date the origins of capitalism? – or perhaps from a > textual/pedantic perspective – whose quotations trump whose? I’m > not uninterested in the historical issue (that was my original > training, and I did a lot of work starting out on the question of > why historical markets differ from modern ones – i.e., why “the > market” we have now carries different consequences than various > other sorts of complex markets in other historical periods). But for > me the definitional stake in this sort of debate relates more to how > we think about transformation, and what it would mean to develop > post-capitalist institutions.>
> One of the things that’s concerned me all the way along in this > work, but that gets occluded – or, more accurately, just hasn’t > been particularly strongly expressed – on the blog, is the issue > of what happens, what sorts of institutional proposals get put > forward and implemented, in those rare historical moments when > substantial radical change suddenly becomes possible. Often, > transformative movements are stopped by sheer hard power, but when > this doesn’t happen, when movements gain power themselves are able > to implement substantial institutional transformations, the changes > they will implement will depend greatly on how these movements > understand what capitalism “is”, and therefore how they > understand what it means to construct a post-capitalist society.>
> So, if capitalism “is” property relations, then changing the > structure of ownership will abolish capitalism. If capitalism > “is” wage labour, then changing the structure of industrial > labour will abolish capitalism. Etc.>
> What I’m working toward – and pretty much everything published > here is a very preliminary step in this process, since there’s > just a huge amount of underbrush clearing that’s needed first, to > clarify what’s happening in Capital as a text, etc. – is a > specification of the specific aggregate social trends in terms of > which capitalism can be defined, so that it becomes possible to ask > a little more clearly whether some specific institutional > configuration is likely to generate those exact same trends, even as > it may also make extensive transformations on the ground in other> ways.
>
> One of the trends I have written a bit about here and there on the > blog is the way in which capitalism pivots around human labour in a > manner that Marx regarded, I think plausibly, as historically > unique. Looked at from a great height, and over a period of time, > capitalism figures as something that is constantly displacing and > reconstituting the need for the expenditure of human labour, in a > way that is disconnected from the “material” need to expend > human labour as a motive force for material reproduction. The > practices that generate this overarching historical pattern are > quite diverse – they generate immediate consequences that can > diverge from the aggregate pattern, and that can also diverge from > the immediate consequences of other practices required to generate > the overarching pattern. If someone looks at capitalism from too > narrow a perspective, they will therefore see “trends” that are, > in practice, checked by the operation of other, conflicting trends > – and, if they extrapolate from one set of trends without taking > into account the implications of conflictual trends that play out in > other aspects of social practice at the same time, they will > misunderstand where the whole aggregate system is heading.>
> If that makes any sense>
> So on one level, I’m saying: yes, there are enormous on the > ground, practical differences between production mediated by slave > labour and production mediated by wage labour – and these > differences should be analysed, and might in fact be possible to > mine for the different potentials they suggest for future social> development.
>
> On another level, I’m saying: capitalism is an indirect effect of > a wide array of concrete practices and, where this isn’t > understood, people are extremely likely to decide to target their > political energies toward a concrete aspect of the overarching > system which can be comfortably abolished without particularly > touching the system itself.>
> Now: I don’t actually /object/ to someone deciding to focus > political energy on a small aspect of the more complex whole. I > think in the short term this is simply necessary, and it can also > make a life-or-death difference on the ground to many many people: > the humanisation of living conditions in a capitalist context is > itself a vital immediate political goal.>
> Where problems can arise, however, is when it isn’t understood > that this is what’s happening – when people think that, by > abolishing x, they are eliminating capitalism itself. This can > create problems both in the sense that people can rationalise more > horrific things, if they believe they are achieving something grand, > and it can create problems because, while believing they are > abolishing capitalism, they can pour enormous amounts of energy into > building a new set of social institutions that happily replicate the > same old dynamic – and this dynamic is itself corrosive of radical > political achievements over time, and institutions that promote it > are generally oppressive in the immediate moment, as well…>
> So basically, I think there’s an on-the-ground value to what can > seem like a very abstract definition of capitalism. But, at the same > time, I need to do much more – to get much more “out” than I > have so far on this blog – to feel like I’ve established any of > this in more than a really gestural way… So I’m sympathetic to> skepticism
>
> But apologies for having to write in such a rushed way – I’ve > probably scrambled the intended content beyond all recognition… > Hopefully I’ll have more time in the coming year to get some of > this out in a more systematic form…>
> Sunday, 21/11/2010 at 7:31 amCapital v.1 ,
Contradiction ,
Metatheory , Philosophyof History
SOMEONE, YOU OR ME, WANTS AN ARTICLE5 Comments
Posted by N Pepperell onNovember 14, 2010
I’m in charge of student selection for a popular undergraduate program this year – around 1300 applicants for 60-odd places. I’m told that selection will severely restrict my ability to do anything else over the summer, aside from reading student applications, and so I’ve been seizing this last precious week before I’m able to access student files, to get some writing done. Two articles down, a third in process hopefully to be largely completed by tomorrow… I don’t normally write in such an assembly-line fashion, but my other work obligations have made it seem like this would be an appropriateskill to develop…
Producing several articles back to back like this has drawn my attention to aspects of my writing process that I hadn’t specifically noticed before. One of the things that strikes me is that I spend the overwhelming amount of my time working out how to get the article started. I don’t mean that I spend a lot of time staring at a blank piece of paper, wondering what to say – each of these pieces is being developed from one or more blog posts written earlier in the year, and so I’m starting with the argument and the bulk of the article structure in front of me from the outset. What’s taking time is working out how to frame the paper for a formal publication. Writing for the blog doesn’t pose this same sort of problem, since I generally just start by saying something like “I was reading something recently that irritated me”, or “someone asked a good question in the comments to this other post”, or even “last we left off, I think I had finally gotten to the second sentence of _Capital_ – maybe it’s time to talk about the third…”, or whatever… Even though I know people may stumble across blog posts fairly randomly, without much sense of other things I’ve written, I still tend to write blog posts as though I’m speaking to people who have been reading for some time, and so don’t require much of a run up to explain why I’m writing on some particular topic. This has the incidental effect of excising from blog writing the thing I find most difficult about formal writing: having to start a paper in a way that will provide a sufficient shared context to enable readers from a fairly diverse set of backgrounds to orient themselves to the issuesyou plan to cover.
So in the past week, I’ve written two papers and a bit, and have spent easily 80% of my time working on the opening couple of pages ofeach piece.
I was discussing this with Duncan the other day, and had a sudden association to the opening “exordium” to Derrida’s _Specters of Marx_. This opening has always annoyed me: > Someone, you or me, comes forward and says: _I would like to learn > to live finally. _ Derrida then proceeds to unpack this sentence – which he has just made up – as one might unpack, say, the opening sentence of _Capital_. He queries the phrasing in his own question: > Finally but why?>
> _To learn to live_: a strange watchword. Who would learn? From whom? > To teach to live, but to whom? Will we ever know? Will we ever know > how to live and first of all what ‘to learn to live’ means? And > why ‘finally’? Now don’t get me wrong: these are pivotal questions which Derrida will explore in the text, and his reflections are moving and substantive – I’ve written in some detail about this work, and am not trying to mock it. But this opening always throws me. These are the sorts of questions one generally asks of a received text, when trying to draw out the intentional or unintentional implications of its strange word choices or obscure imagery. To subject to the same treatment a question you’ve just introduced – a question that no one else may want to ask, or not in that way, with the peculiar phrasing and structure that you immediately begin to pick apart – this has just struck me as a strange thing to do. Until I found myself talking the other day about how much time I was spending on preliminaries that were, in many respects, incidental to the argument I was trying to make. I rarely _myself_ started writing on a topic for the reasons I end up putting at the tops of articles – the hooks and frames I use are almost never why I personally got engaged with the material – that’s why they don’t show up on the top of blog posts… By the time I’m drafting a formal version of a paper, I’ve almost always written the entire argument first, and then I end up having to go through an entirely separate process to work out how to communicate to other people “what’s in it for them”, that they should read the piece. And as I was discussing all of this the other day, the exordium popped into my head. “Someone, you or me, comes forward…” Whatever Derrida’s intentions, it’s sort of the perfect response: “Someone, you or me, comes forward and says, ‘Hey Nicole! Why don’t you write an article on _this_!'” I can then earnestly respond, not having to explain why I should be writing this – I’ve been asked to! See! The question is right there! The exordium that’s been irritating me for so long, it turns out, is pretty much exactly what I myself do in almost every substantive blog post. Someone, you or me, has asked me to write this… Occasionally, it’s someone… More often, it’s me… But no matter… how am I going to answer thequestion now…
Somehow since thinking of this, I can’t shake the recurrent thought of this line as the universal article opening: someone, you or me, comes forward and says… how about a paper on commodity speech? someone, you or me, comes forward and says… whatcha reckon about that base/superstructure distinction? someone, you or me, comesforward and says…
Now time to get back to writing that last intro…Writing
MARX ROUNDTABLE: UPDATE18 Comments
Posted by N Pepperell onNovember 8, 2010
Just updating an earlier postabout
the Roundtable on Marx’s _Capital_, to be held by the Society for Social and Political Philosophy at Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, from 24-27 February, 2011. The scheduled participantsare:
> Keynote:
> Harry Cleaver, Associate Professor of Economics, University of Texas> at Austin
>
> Roundtable Presenters: > Alex Anderson, Ph. D. candidate in Philosophy, McGill University > Arianne Fischer, Assistant Professor of Intellectual Heritage, > Temple University > Douglas Hanes, Ph. D. candidate in Political Science, McGill> University
> Jamie Kelly, Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Vassar College > Adam Moeller, Ph. D. candidate in Philosophy, Emory University > Rafael Mota, Ph. D. candidate in Philosophy, Interpretation and > Culture, SUNY Binghamton > Patrick Murray, Professor of Philosophy, Creighton University > Nicole Pepperell, Program Director, Social Science (Psychology),> RMIT University
> Christopher Ruth, Ph. D. candidate in Philosophy, Villanova> University
> Devin Zane Shaw, Part-Time Professor of Philosophy, University of> Ottawa
> Jessica Soester, Ph. D. candidate in Philosophy, Southern Illinois> University
> Sarah Vitale, Ph. D. candidate in Philosophy, Villanova University>
> Discussants:
> William Lewis, Associate Professor of Philosophy, Skidmore College > Jason Read, Associate Professor of Philosophy, University of> Southern Maine
> William Clare Roberts, Faculty Lecturer in Philosophy and Political > Science, McGill University > Hasana Sharp, Assistant Professor of Philosophy, McGill University > Amy Wendling, Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Creighton> University
> Cory Wimberly, Assistant Professor of Philosophy, University of > Texas–Pan American The event has a very nice format, designed to provide generous time for presentations and discussion. I’m looking forward to it. As long as I’m escaping from Australia for a bit, I’ll likely head to the UK for at least a couple of weeks, before heading to the US for this event. If anyone knows of interesting happenings in the UK or the US in mid-February, let me know… Capital v.1 , Events← Older posts
RSS feed
Search for:
RECENT POSTS
* Uncomfortable Science * Capital Against Capitalism* Meanders
* Egypt – Signal Boost * CFP: Capital Against CapitalismARCHIVES
* July 2011
* June 2011
* February 2011
* January 2011
* November 2010
* September 2010
* August 2010
* July 2010
* April 2010
* March 2010
* February 2010
* December 2009
* September 2009
* July 2009
* June 2009
* May 2009
* March 2009
* February 2009
* January 2009
* November 2008
* October 2008
* September 2008
* August 2008
* July 2008
* June 2008
* May 2008
* April 2008
* March 2008
* February 2008
* January 2008
* December 2007
* November 2007
* October 2007
* September 2007
* August 2007
* July 2007
* June 2007
* May 2007
* April 2007
* March 2007
* February 2007
* January 2007
* December 2006
* November 2006
* October 2006
* September 2006
* August 2006
* July 2006
* June 2006
* May 2006
* April 2006
* March 2006
* December 2005
* November 2005
* October 2005
* June 2005
* April 2005
* March 2005
* February 2005
CATEGORIES
* Abstraction
* Admin
* Analytic/Continental* Blogging
* Book
* Capital v.1
* City Planning
* Coffee
* Cognitive Science
* Contradiction
* Conversations
* Courses
* Critical Theory
* Critique
* Current Events
* Dialogue
* Drafts
* Ecology
* Empiricism
* Events
* Family
* Fetish
* Fieldwork
* Grundrisse
* Intellectual Property* Interdisciplinary
* Linguistics
* Links
* Logic
* Logic of Science
* Marxes
* Materialism
* Math and Science
* Metatheory
* Methodology
* Miscellaneous
* Negations
* Overheard
* Phenomenology of Spirit * Philosophy of History* Political Economy
* Politics
* Procrastination
* Professional Life
* Psychology
* Reading
* Reading Group
* Reification
* Religion
* Self-Reflexivity
* Social Movements
* Social Science
* Sociology of Knowledge* Supervision
* Teaching
* Technology
* Thesis
* Transformation
* Writing
META
* Register
* Log in
* Entries feed
* Comments feed
* WordPress.com
Advertisements
Powered by wordads.co Thank you for submitting the report!Seen ad many times
Not relevant
Offensive
Covers content
Broken
Report this ad
↑ Top Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com. Do Not Sell My PersonalInformation
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use. To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: CookiePolicy
* Follow
*
* Rough Theory
* Customize
* Follow
* Sign up
* Log in
* Report this content * Manage subscriptions* Collapse this bar
Powered by wordads.co Thank you for submitting the report!Seen ad many times
Not relevant
Offensive
Covers content
Broken
Report this ad
Details
Copyright © 2024 ArchiveBay.com. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | DMCA | 2021 | Feedback | Advertising | RSS 2.0