Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
More Annotations
A complete backup of www.www.anonib.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of www.www.barravipsrio.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of www.asiaerotica.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of www.shoepalace.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of www.www.relaxchile.cl
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of girlsgogames.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of www.aerisdies.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of www.azz-overload.net
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of femaledominationworld.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of www.www.hotgirlclub.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of www.www.amyellisnutt.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Favourite Annotations
Text
States.
LANGE V. CALIFORNIA
Facts of the case. A California Highway Patrol officer observed a parked car “playing music very loudly,” and then the driver, Arthur Gregory Lange, honked the horn four or five times despite there being no other vehicles nearby. Finding this behavior unusual, the officer began following Lange, intending to conduct a traffic stop. MONTGOMERY V. LOUISIANA The Supreme Court had jurisdiction to review the Louisiana Supreme Court’s decision, and the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v.Alabama, which prohibits sentencing schemes that impose a punishment of mandatory life without parole for juvenile offenders convicted of homicide, applied retroactively.Justice Anthony M. Kennedy delivered the opinion for the 6-3 majority. KATZENBACH V. MCCLUNG In a unanimous decision authored by Justice Clark, the Court held McClung could be barred from discriminating against African Americans under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Court reasoned that discrimination in restaurants posed significant burdens on "the interstate flow of food and upon the movement on products generally." KATZ V. UNITED STATES Conclusion. Yes. The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for SEILA LAW LLC V. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU A case in which the Court held that the vesting of substantial executive authority in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an independent agency led by a single director, violates the separation of powers, but the statutory provision creating that violation, 12 U.S.C. § 5491(c)(3) is severable from the Dodd-Frank Act.EISENSTADT V. BAIRD
Facts of the case. William Baird gave away Emko Vaginal Foam to a woman following his Boston University lecture on birth control and over-population. Massachusetts charged Baird with a felony, to distribute contraceptives to unmarried men or women. Under the law, only married couples could obtain contraceptives; only registereddoctors or
MILLER V. ALABAMA
Miller filed a post trial motion for a new trial, arguing that sentencing a 14-year-old to life without the possibility of parole constituted cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The trial court denied the motion. On appeal, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the lower court's decision.WICKARD V. FILBURN
Facts of the case. Filburn was a small farmer in Ohio who harvested nearly 12 acres of wheat above his allotment under the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938. Filburn was penalized under the Act. He argued that the extra wheat that he had produced in violation of the law had been used for his own use and thus had no effect on interstate{{META.FULLTITLE}}
Unanimous decision for McCullenmajority opinion by John G. Roberts, Jr. The First Amendment prohibits laws restricting speech surrounding abortion clinic locations. Yes, unanswered. Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. delivered the opinion for the 9-0 majority. The Court held that the Massachusetts law was content-neutral on its facebecause a
OYEZCASESJUSTICESABOUTTOURARGUMENT 2.0LAWYER DIRECTORY A multimedia judicial archive of the Supreme Court of the UnitedStates.
LANGE V. CALIFORNIA
Facts of the case. A California Highway Patrol officer observed a parked car “playing music very loudly,” and then the driver, Arthur Gregory Lange, honked the horn four or five times despite there being no other vehicles nearby. Finding this behavior unusual, the officer began following Lange, intending to conduct a traffic stop. MONTGOMERY V. LOUISIANA The Supreme Court had jurisdiction to review the Louisiana Supreme Court’s decision, and the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v.Alabama, which prohibits sentencing schemes that impose a punishment of mandatory life without parole for juvenile offenders convicted of homicide, applied retroactively.Justice Anthony M. Kennedy delivered the opinion for the 6-3 majority. KATZENBACH V. MCCLUNG In a unanimous decision authored by Justice Clark, the Court held McClung could be barred from discriminating against African Americans under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Court reasoned that discrimination in restaurants posed significant burdens on "the interstate flow of food and upon the movement on products generally." KATZ V. UNITED STATES Conclusion. Yes. The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for SEILA LAW LLC V. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU A case in which the Court held that the vesting of substantial executive authority in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an independent agency led by a single director, violates the separation of powers, but the statutory provision creating that violation, 12 U.S.C. § 5491(c)(3) is severable from the Dodd-Frank Act.EISENSTADT V. BAIRD
Facts of the case. William Baird gave away Emko Vaginal Foam to a woman following his Boston University lecture on birth control and over-population. Massachusetts charged Baird with a felony, to distribute contraceptives to unmarried men or women. Under the law, only married couples could obtain contraceptives; only registereddoctors or
MILLER V. ALABAMA
Miller filed a post trial motion for a new trial, arguing that sentencing a 14-year-old to life without the possibility of parole constituted cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The trial court denied the motion. On appeal, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the lower court's decision.WICKARD V. FILBURN
Facts of the case. Filburn was a small farmer in Ohio who harvested nearly 12 acres of wheat above his allotment under the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938. Filburn was penalized under the Act. He argued that the extra wheat that he had produced in violation of the law had been used for his own use and thus had no effect on interstate{{META.FULLTITLE}}
Unanimous decision for McCullenmajority opinion by John G. Roberts, Jr. The First Amendment prohibits laws restricting speech surrounding abortion clinic locations. Yes, unanswered. Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. delivered the opinion for the 9-0 majority. The Court held that the Massachusetts law was content-neutral on its facebecause a
BRANDENBURG V. OHIO
Brandenburg, a leader in the Ku Klux Klan, made a speech at a Klan rally and was later convicted under an Ohio criminal syndicalism law. The law made illegal advocating "crime, sabotage, violence, or unlawful methods of terrorism as a means of accomplishing industrial or political reform," as well as assembling "with any society, group, or assemblage of persons formed to teach or advocate the FULTON V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA Facts of the case. In March 2018, the City of Philadelphia barred Catholic Social Services (CSS) from placing children in foster homes because of its policy of not licensing same-sex couples to be foster parents. CSS sued the City of Philadelphia, asking the court to order the city to renew their contract.MIRANDA V. ARIZONA
The written confession was admitted into evidence at trial despite the objection of the defense attorney and the fact that the police officers admitted that they had not advised Miranda of his right to have an attorney present during the interrogation. The jury found Miranda guilty. On appeal, the Supreme Court of Arizona affirmed andheld that
BAKER V. CARR
Facts of the case. Charles W. Baker and other Tennessee citizens alleged that a 1901 law designed to apportion the seats for the state's General Assembly was virtually ignored. Baker's suit detailed how Tennessee's reapportionment efforts ignored significant economicgrowth and
GRUTTER V. BOLLINGER Facts of the case. In 1997, Barbara Grutter, a white resident of Michigan, applied for admission to the University of Michigan Law School. Grutter applied with a 3.8 undergraduate GPA and an LSAT score of 161. She was denied admission.PLESSY V. FERGUSON
Louisiana enacted the Separate Car Act, which required separate railway cars for blacks and whites. In 1892, Homer Plessy – who was seven-eighths Caucasian – agreed to participate in a JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES LLC V. RUSSO A case in which the Court reversed a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upholding Louisiana’s law requiring physicians who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a local hospital because it conflicted with the Court’s binding precedent in Whole Woman’s Health v.BOWERS V. HARDWICK
After being charged with violating a Georgia statute that criminalized sodomy, Hardwick challenged the statute's constitutionality in Federal District Court. Following a ruling that Hardwick failed to state a claim, the court dismissed. On appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed and remanded, holding that Georgia's statute was unconstitutional.FURMAN V. GEORGIA
Furman was burglarizing a private home when a family member discovered him. He attempted to flee, and in doing so tripped and fell. The gun that he was carrying went off and killed a resident of the home. He was convicted of murder and sentenced to death (Two other death penalty cases were decided along with Furman: Jackson v.SHAW V. RENO
Facts of the case. The U.S. Attorney General rejected a North Carolina congressional reapportionment plan because the plan created only one black-majority district. North Carolina submitted a second plan creating two black-majority districts. One of these districts was, in parts, no wider than the interstate road along which it stretched. OYEZCASESJUSTICESABOUTTOURARGUMENT 2.0LAWYER DIRECTORY A multimedia judicial archive of the Supreme Court of the UnitedStates.
LANGE V. CALIFORNIA
Facts of the case. A California Highway Patrol officer observed a parked car “playing music very loudly,” and then the driver, Arthur Gregory Lange, honked the horn four or five times despite there being no other vehicles nearby. Finding this behavior unusual, the officer began following Lange, intending to conduct a traffic stop. MONTGOMERY V. LOUISIANA The Supreme Court had jurisdiction to review the Louisiana Supreme Court’s decision, and the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v.Alabama, which prohibits sentencing schemes that impose a punishment of mandatory life without parole for juvenile offenders convicted of homicide, applied retroactively.Justice Anthony M. Kennedy delivered the opinion for the 6-3 majority. KATZENBACH V. MCCLUNG In a unanimous decision authored by Justice Clark, the Court held McClung could be barred from discriminating against African Americans under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Court reasoned that discrimination in restaurants posed significant burdens on "the interstate flow of food and upon the movement on products generally." KATZ V. UNITED STATES Conclusion. Yes. The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for SEILA LAW LLC V. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU A case in which the Court held that the vesting of substantial executive authority in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an independent agency led by a single director, violates the separation of powers, but the statutory provision creating that violation, 12 U.S.C. § 5491(c)(3) is severable from the Dodd-Frank Act.EISENSTADT V. BAIRD
Facts of the case. William Baird gave away Emko Vaginal Foam to a woman following his Boston University lecture on birth control and over-population. Massachusetts charged Baird with a felony, to distribute contraceptives to unmarried men or women. Under the law, only married couples could obtain contraceptives; only registereddoctors or
MILLER V. ALABAMA
Miller filed a post trial motion for a new trial, arguing that sentencing a 14-year-old to life without the possibility of parole constituted cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The trial court denied the motion. On appeal, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the lower court's decision.WICKARD V. FILBURN
Facts of the case. Filburn was a small farmer in Ohio who harvested nearly 12 acres of wheat above his allotment under the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938. Filburn was penalized under the Act. He argued that the extra wheat that he had produced in violation of the law had been used for his own use and thus had no effect on interstate{{META.FULLTITLE}}
Unanimous decision for McCullenmajority opinion by John G. Roberts, Jr. The First Amendment prohibits laws restricting speech surrounding abortion clinic locations. Yes, unanswered. Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. delivered the opinion for the 9-0 majority. The Court held that the Massachusetts law was content-neutral on its facebecause a
OYEZCASESJUSTICESABOUTTOURARGUMENT 2.0LAWYER DIRECTORY A multimedia judicial archive of the Supreme Court of the UnitedStates.
LANGE V. CALIFORNIA
Facts of the case. A California Highway Patrol officer observed a parked car “playing music very loudly,” and then the driver, Arthur Gregory Lange, honked the horn four or five times despite there being no other vehicles nearby. Finding this behavior unusual, the officer began following Lange, intending to conduct a traffic stop. MONTGOMERY V. LOUISIANA The Supreme Court had jurisdiction to review the Louisiana Supreme Court’s decision, and the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v.Alabama, which prohibits sentencing schemes that impose a punishment of mandatory life without parole for juvenile offenders convicted of homicide, applied retroactively.Justice Anthony M. Kennedy delivered the opinion for the 6-3 majority. KATZENBACH V. MCCLUNG In a unanimous decision authored by Justice Clark, the Court held McClung could be barred from discriminating against African Americans under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Court reasoned that discrimination in restaurants posed significant burdens on "the interstate flow of food and upon the movement on products generally." KATZ V. UNITED STATES Conclusion. Yes. The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for SEILA LAW LLC V. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU A case in which the Court held that the vesting of substantial executive authority in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an independent agency led by a single director, violates the separation of powers, but the statutory provision creating that violation, 12 U.S.C. § 5491(c)(3) is severable from the Dodd-Frank Act.EISENSTADT V. BAIRD
Facts of the case. William Baird gave away Emko Vaginal Foam to a woman following his Boston University lecture on birth control and over-population. Massachusetts charged Baird with a felony, to distribute contraceptives to unmarried men or women. Under the law, only married couples could obtain contraceptives; only registereddoctors or
MILLER V. ALABAMA
Miller filed a post trial motion for a new trial, arguing that sentencing a 14-year-old to life without the possibility of parole constituted cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The trial court denied the motion. On appeal, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the lower court's decision.WICKARD V. FILBURN
Facts of the case. Filburn was a small farmer in Ohio who harvested nearly 12 acres of wheat above his allotment under the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938. Filburn was penalized under the Act. He argued that the extra wheat that he had produced in violation of the law had been used for his own use and thus had no effect on interstate{{META.FULLTITLE}}
Unanimous decision for McCullenmajority opinion by John G. Roberts, Jr. The First Amendment prohibits laws restricting speech surrounding abortion clinic locations. Yes, unanswered. Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. delivered the opinion for the 9-0 majority. The Court held that the Massachusetts law was content-neutral on its facebecause a
BRANDENBURG V. OHIO
Brandenburg, a leader in the Ku Klux Klan, made a speech at a Klan rally and was later convicted under an Ohio criminal syndicalism law. The law made illegal advocating "crime, sabotage, violence, or unlawful methods of terrorism as a means of accomplishing industrial or political reform," as well as assembling "with any society, group, or assemblage of persons formed to teach or advocate theMIRANDA V. ARIZONA
The written confession was admitted into evidence at trial despite the objection of the defense attorney and the fact that the police officers admitted that they had not advised Miranda of his right to have an attorney present during the interrogation. The jury found Miranda guilty. On appeal, the Supreme Court of Arizona affirmed andheld that
FULTON V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA Facts of the case. In March 2018, the City of Philadelphia barred Catholic Social Services (CSS) from placing children in foster homes because of its policy of not licensing same-sex couples to be foster parents. CSS sued the City of Philadelphia, asking the court to order the city to renew their contract.BAKER V. CARR
Facts of the case. Charles W. Baker and other Tennessee citizens alleged that a 1901 law designed to apportion the seats for the state's General Assembly was virtually ignored. Baker's suit detailed how Tennessee's reapportionment efforts ignored significant economicgrowth and
GRUTTER V. BOLLINGER Facts of the case. In 1997, Barbara Grutter, a white resident of Michigan, applied for admission to the University of Michigan Law School. Grutter applied with a 3.8 undergraduate GPA and an LSAT score of 161. She was denied admission.PLESSY V. FERGUSON
Louisiana enacted the Separate Car Act, which required separate railway cars for blacks and whites. In 1892, Homer Plessy – who was seven-eighths Caucasian – agreed to participate in a JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES LLC V. RUSSO A case in which the Court reversed a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upholding Louisiana’s law requiring physicians who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a local hospital because it conflicted with the Court’s binding precedent in Whole Woman’s Health v.FURMAN V. GEORGIA
Furman was burglarizing a private home when a family member discovered him. He attempted to flee, and in doing so tripped and fell. The gun that he was carrying went off and killed a resident of the home. He was convicted of murder and sentenced to death (Two other death penalty cases were decided along with Furman: Jackson v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE V. SITZ In 1986, the Michigan State Police Department created a sobriety checkpoint program aimed at reducing drunk driving within the state. The program included guidelines governing the location of roadblocks and the amount of publicity to be given to the operation. Before the first roadblock went into effect, Rick Sitz, a licensed Michigandriver
SHAW V. RENO
Facts of the case. The U.S. Attorney General rejected a North Carolina congressional reapportionment plan because the plan created only one black-majority district. North Carolina submitted a second plan creating two black-majority districts. One of these districts was, in parts, no wider than the interstate road along which it stretched. OYEZCASESJUSTICESABOUTTOURARGUMENT 2.0LAWYER DIRECTORY A multimedia judicial archive of the Supreme Court of the UnitedStates.
LANGE V. CALIFORNIA
Facts of the case. A California Highway Patrol officer observed a parked car “playing music very loudly,” and then the driver, Arthur Gregory Lange, honked the horn four or five times despite there being no other vehicles nearby. Finding this behavior unusual, the officer began following Lange, intending to conduct a traffic stop. MONTGOMERY V. LOUISIANA The Supreme Court had jurisdiction to review the Louisiana Supreme Court’s decision, and the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v.Alabama, which prohibits sentencing schemes that impose a punishment of mandatory life without parole for juvenile offenders convicted of homicide, applied retroactively.Justice Anthony M. Kennedy delivered the opinion for the 6-3 majority. KATZENBACH V. MCCLUNG In a unanimous decision authored by Justice Clark, the Court held McClung could be barred from discriminating against African Americans under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Court reasoned that discrimination in restaurants posed significant burdens on "the interstate flow of food and upon the movement on products generally." KATZ V. UNITED STATES Conclusion. Yes. The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for SEILA LAW LLC V. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU A case in which the Court held that the vesting of substantial executive authority in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an independent agency led by a single director, violates the separation of powers, but the statutory provision creating that violation, 12 U.S.C. § 5491(c)(3) is severable from the Dodd-Frank Act.EISENSTADT V. BAIRD
Facts of the case. William Baird gave away Emko Vaginal Foam to a woman following his Boston University lecture on birth control and over-population. Massachusetts charged Baird with a felony, to distribute contraceptives to unmarried men or women. Under the law, only married couples could obtain contraceptives; only registereddoctors or
MILLER V. ALABAMA
Miller filed a post trial motion for a new trial, arguing that sentencing a 14-year-old to life without the possibility of parole constituted cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The trial court denied the motion. On appeal, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the lower court's decision.WICKARD V. FILBURN
Facts of the case. Filburn was a small farmer in Ohio who harvested nearly 12 acres of wheat above his allotment under the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938. Filburn was penalized under the Act. He argued that the extra wheat that he had produced in violation of the law had been used for his own use and thus had no effect on interstate{{META.FULLTITLE}}
Unanimous decision for McCullenmajority opinion by John G. Roberts, Jr. The First Amendment prohibits laws restricting speech surrounding abortion clinic locations. Yes, unanswered. Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. delivered the opinion for the 9-0 majority. The Court held that the Massachusetts law was content-neutral on its facebecause a
OYEZCASESJUSTICESABOUTTOURARGUMENT 2.0LAWYER DIRECTORY A multimedia judicial archive of the Supreme Court of the UnitedStates.
LANGE V. CALIFORNIA
Facts of the case. A California Highway Patrol officer observed a parked car “playing music very loudly,” and then the driver, Arthur Gregory Lange, honked the horn four or five times despite there being no other vehicles nearby. Finding this behavior unusual, the officer began following Lange, intending to conduct a traffic stop. MONTGOMERY V. LOUISIANA The Supreme Court had jurisdiction to review the Louisiana Supreme Court’s decision, and the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v.Alabama, which prohibits sentencing schemes that impose a punishment of mandatory life without parole for juvenile offenders convicted of homicide, applied retroactively.Justice Anthony M. Kennedy delivered the opinion for the 6-3 majority. KATZENBACH V. MCCLUNG In a unanimous decision authored by Justice Clark, the Court held McClung could be barred from discriminating against African Americans under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Court reasoned that discrimination in restaurants posed significant burdens on "the interstate flow of food and upon the movement on products generally." KATZ V. UNITED STATES Conclusion. Yes. The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for SEILA LAW LLC V. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU A case in which the Court held that the vesting of substantial executive authority in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an independent agency led by a single director, violates the separation of powers, but the statutory provision creating that violation, 12 U.S.C. § 5491(c)(3) is severable from the Dodd-Frank Act.EISENSTADT V. BAIRD
Facts of the case. William Baird gave away Emko Vaginal Foam to a woman following his Boston University lecture on birth control and over-population. Massachusetts charged Baird with a felony, to distribute contraceptives to unmarried men or women. Under the law, only married couples could obtain contraceptives; only registereddoctors or
MILLER V. ALABAMA
Miller filed a post trial motion for a new trial, arguing that sentencing a 14-year-old to life without the possibility of parole constituted cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The trial court denied the motion. On appeal, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the lower court's decision.WICKARD V. FILBURN
Facts of the case. Filburn was a small farmer in Ohio who harvested nearly 12 acres of wheat above his allotment under the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938. Filburn was penalized under the Act. He argued that the extra wheat that he had produced in violation of the law had been used for his own use and thus had no effect on interstate{{META.FULLTITLE}}
Unanimous decision for McCullenmajority opinion by John G. Roberts, Jr. The First Amendment prohibits laws restricting speech surrounding abortion clinic locations. Yes, unanswered. Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. delivered the opinion for the 9-0 majority. The Court held that the Massachusetts law was content-neutral on its facebecause a
BRANDENBURG V. OHIO
Brandenburg, a leader in the Ku Klux Klan, made a speech at a Klan rally and was later convicted under an Ohio criminal syndicalism law. The law made illegal advocating "crime, sabotage, violence, or unlawful methods of terrorism as a means of accomplishing industrial or political reform," as well as assembling "with any society, group, or assemblage of persons formed to teach or advocate theMIRANDA V. ARIZONA
The written confession was admitted into evidence at trial despite the objection of the defense attorney and the fact that the police officers admitted that they had not advised Miranda of his right to have an attorney present during the interrogation. The jury found Miranda guilty. On appeal, the Supreme Court of Arizona affirmed andheld that
FULTON V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA Facts of the case. In March 2018, the City of Philadelphia barred Catholic Social Services (CSS) from placing children in foster homes because of its policy of not licensing same-sex couples to be foster parents. CSS sued the City of Philadelphia, asking the court to order the city to renew their contract.BAKER V. CARR
Facts of the case. Charles W. Baker and other Tennessee citizens alleged that a 1901 law designed to apportion the seats for the state's General Assembly was virtually ignored. Baker's suit detailed how Tennessee's reapportionment efforts ignored significant economicgrowth and
GRUTTER V. BOLLINGER Facts of the case. In 1997, Barbara Grutter, a white resident of Michigan, applied for admission to the University of Michigan Law School. Grutter applied with a 3.8 undergraduate GPA and an LSAT score of 161. She was denied admission.PLESSY V. FERGUSON
Louisiana enacted the Separate Car Act, which required separate railway cars for blacks and whites. In 1892, Homer Plessy – who was seven-eighths Caucasian – agreed to participate in a JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES LLC V. RUSSO A case in which the Court reversed a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upholding Louisiana’s law requiring physicians who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a local hospital because it conflicted with the Court’s binding precedent in Whole Woman’s Health v.FURMAN V. GEORGIA
Furman was burglarizing a private home when a family member discovered him. He attempted to flee, and in doing so tripped and fell. The gun that he was carrying went off and killed a resident of the home. He was convicted of murder and sentenced to death (Two other death penalty cases were decided along with Furman: Jackson v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE V. SITZ In 1986, the Michigan State Police Department created a sobriety checkpoint program aimed at reducing drunk driving within the state. The program included guidelines governing the location of roadblocks and the amount of publicity to be given to the operation. Before the first roadblock went into effect, Rick Sitz, a licensed Michigandriver
SHAW V. RENO
Facts of the case. The U.S. Attorney General rejected a North Carolina congressional reapportionment plan because the plan created only one black-majority district. North Carolina submitted a second plan creating two black-majority districts. One of these districts was, in parts, no wider than the interstate road along which it stretched. OYEZCASESJUSTICESABOUTTOURARGUMENT 2.0LAWYER DIRECTORY A multimedia judicial archive of the Supreme Court of the UnitedStates.
LANGE V. CALIFORNIA
Facts of the case. A California Highway Patrol officer observed a parked car “playing music very loudly,” and then the driver, Arthur Gregory Lange, honked the horn four or five times despite there being no other vehicles nearby. Finding this behavior unusual, the officer began following Lange, intending to conduct a traffic stop. MONTGOMERY V. LOUISIANA The Supreme Court had jurisdiction to review the Louisiana Supreme Court’s decision, and the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v.Alabama, which prohibits sentencing schemes that impose a punishment of mandatory life without parole for juvenile offenders convicted of homicide, applied retroactively.Justice Anthony M. Kennedy delivered the opinion for the 6-3 majority. KATZENBACH V. MCCLUNG In a unanimous decision authored by Justice Clark, the Court held McClung could be barred from discriminating against African Americans under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Court reasoned that discrimination in restaurants posed significant burdens on "the interstate flow of food and upon the movement on products generally." KATZ V. UNITED STATES Conclusion. Yes. The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for SEILA LAW LLC V. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU A case in which the Court held that the vesting of substantial executive authority in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an independent agency led by a single director, violates the separation of powers, but the statutory provision creating that violation, 12 U.S.C. § 5491(c)(3) is severable from the Dodd-Frank Act.EISENSTADT V. BAIRD
Facts of the case. William Baird gave away Emko Vaginal Foam to a woman following his Boston University lecture on birth control and over-population. Massachusetts charged Baird with a felony, to distribute contraceptives to unmarried men or women. Under the law, only married couples could obtain contraceptives; only registereddoctors or
MILLER V. ALABAMA
Miller filed a post trial motion for a new trial, arguing that sentencing a 14-year-old to life without the possibility of parole constituted cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The trial court denied the motion. On appeal, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the lower court's decision.WICKARD V. FILBURN
Facts of the case. Filburn was a small farmer in Ohio who harvested nearly 12 acres of wheat above his allotment under the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938. Filburn was penalized under the Act. He argued that the extra wheat that he had produced in violation of the law had been used for his own use and thus had no effect on interstate{{META.FULLTITLE}}
Unanimous decision for McCullenmajority opinion by John G. Roberts, Jr. The First Amendment prohibits laws restricting speech surrounding abortion clinic locations. Yes, unanswered. Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. delivered the opinion for the 9-0 majority. The Court held that the Massachusetts law was content-neutral on its facebecause a
OYEZCASESJUSTICESABOUTTOURARGUMENT 2.0LAWYER DIRECTORY A multimedia judicial archive of the Supreme Court of the UnitedStates.
LANGE V. CALIFORNIA
Facts of the case. A California Highway Patrol officer observed a parked car “playing music very loudly,” and then the driver, Arthur Gregory Lange, honked the horn four or five times despite there being no other vehicles nearby. Finding this behavior unusual, the officer began following Lange, intending to conduct a traffic stop. MONTGOMERY V. LOUISIANA The Supreme Court had jurisdiction to review the Louisiana Supreme Court’s decision, and the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v.Alabama, which prohibits sentencing schemes that impose a punishment of mandatory life without parole for juvenile offenders convicted of homicide, applied retroactively.Justice Anthony M. Kennedy delivered the opinion for the 6-3 majority. KATZENBACH V. MCCLUNG In a unanimous decision authored by Justice Clark, the Court held McClung could be barred from discriminating against African Americans under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Court reasoned that discrimination in restaurants posed significant burdens on "the interstate flow of food and upon the movement on products generally." KATZ V. UNITED STATES Conclusion. Yes. The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for SEILA LAW LLC V. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU A case in which the Court held that the vesting of substantial executive authority in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an independent agency led by a single director, violates the separation of powers, but the statutory provision creating that violation, 12 U.S.C. § 5491(c)(3) is severable from the Dodd-Frank Act.EISENSTADT V. BAIRD
Facts of the case. William Baird gave away Emko Vaginal Foam to a woman following his Boston University lecture on birth control and over-population. Massachusetts charged Baird with a felony, to distribute contraceptives to unmarried men or women. Under the law, only married couples could obtain contraceptives; only registereddoctors or
MILLER V. ALABAMA
Miller filed a post trial motion for a new trial, arguing that sentencing a 14-year-old to life without the possibility of parole constituted cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The trial court denied the motion. On appeal, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the lower court's decision.WICKARD V. FILBURN
Facts of the case. Filburn was a small farmer in Ohio who harvested nearly 12 acres of wheat above his allotment under the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938. Filburn was penalized under the Act. He argued that the extra wheat that he had produced in violation of the law had been used for his own use and thus had no effect on interstate{{META.FULLTITLE}}
Unanimous decision for McCullenmajority opinion by John G. Roberts, Jr. The First Amendment prohibits laws restricting speech surrounding abortion clinic locations. Yes, unanswered. Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. delivered the opinion for the 9-0 majority. The Court held that the Massachusetts law was content-neutral on its facebecause a
BRANDENBURG V. OHIO
Brandenburg, a leader in the Ku Klux Klan, made a speech at a Klan rally and was later convicted under an Ohio criminal syndicalism law. The law made illegal advocating "crime, sabotage, violence, or unlawful methods of terrorism as a means of accomplishing industrial or political reform," as well as assembling "with any society, group, or assemblage of persons formed to teach or advocate theMIRANDA V. ARIZONA
The written confession was admitted into evidence at trial despite the objection of the defense attorney and the fact that the police officers admitted that they had not advised Miranda of his right to have an attorney present during the interrogation. The jury found Miranda guilty. On appeal, the Supreme Court of Arizona affirmed andheld that
FULTON V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA Facts of the case. In March 2018, the City of Philadelphia barred Catholic Social Services (CSS) from placing children in foster homes because of its policy of not licensing same-sex couples to be foster parents. CSS sued the City of Philadelphia, asking the court to order the city to renew their contract.BAKER V. CARR
Facts of the case. Charles W. Baker and other Tennessee citizens alleged that a 1901 law designed to apportion the seats for the state's General Assembly was virtually ignored. Baker's suit detailed how Tennessee's reapportionment efforts ignored significant economicgrowth and
GRUTTER V. BOLLINGER Facts of the case. In 1997, Barbara Grutter, a white resident of Michigan, applied for admission to the University of Michigan Law School. Grutter applied with a 3.8 undergraduate GPA and an LSAT score of 161. She was denied admission.PLESSY V. FERGUSON
Louisiana enacted the Separate Car Act, which required separate railway cars for blacks and whites. In 1892, Homer Plessy – who was seven-eighths Caucasian – agreed to participate in a JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES LLC V. RUSSO A case in which the Court reversed a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upholding Louisiana’s law requiring physicians who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a local hospital because it conflicted with the Court’s binding precedent in Whole Woman’s Health v.FURMAN V. GEORGIA
Furman was burglarizing a private home when a family member discovered him. He attempted to flee, and in doing so tripped and fell. The gun that he was carrying went off and killed a resident of the home. He was convicted of murder and sentenced to death (Two other death penalty cases were decided along with Furman: Jackson v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE V. SITZ In 1986, the Michigan State Police Department created a sobriety checkpoint program aimed at reducing drunk driving within the state. The program included guidelines governing the location of roadblocks and the amount of publicity to be given to the operation. Before the first roadblock went into effect, Rick Sitz, a licensed Michigandriver
SHAW V. RENO
Facts of the case. The U.S. Attorney General rejected a North Carolina congressional reapportionment plan because the plan created only one black-majority district. North Carolina submitted a second plan creating two black-majority districts. One of these districts was, in parts, no wider than the interstate road along which it stretched. OYEZCASESJUSTICESABOUTTOURARGUMENT 2.0LAWYER DIRECTORY A multimedia judicial archive of the Supreme Court of the UnitedStates.
{{META.FULLTITLE}}
About; License; Lawyer Directory; Projects. Shifting Scales; Body Politic; Tour; Site Feedback; Support Oyez & LII; LII Supreme Court Resources; Justia Supreme Court SEILA LAW LLC V. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU A case in which the Court held that the vesting of substantial executive authority in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an independent agency led by a single director, violates the separation of powers, but the statutory provision creating that violation, 12 U.S.C. § 5491(c)(3) is severable from the Dodd-Frank Act. MONTGOMERY V. LOUISIANA The Supreme Court had jurisdiction to review the Louisiana Supreme Court’s decision, and the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v.Alabama, which prohibits sentencing schemes that impose a punishment of mandatory life without parole for juvenile offenders convicted of homicide, applied retroactively.Justice Anthony M. Kennedy delivered the opinion for the 6-3 majority. KATZENBACH V. MCCLUNG In a unanimous decision authored by Justice Clark, the Court held McClung could be barred from discriminating against African Americans under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Court reasoned that discrimination in restaurants posed significant burdens on "the interstate flow of food and upon the movement on products generally."EISENSTADT V. BAIRD
Facts of the case. William Baird gave away Emko Vaginal Foam to a woman following his Boston University lecture on birth control and over-population. Massachusetts charged Baird with a felony, to distribute contraceptives to unmarried men or women. Under the law, only married couples could obtain contraceptives; only registereddoctors or
NEW JERSEY V. T.L.O. T.L.O. was charged with possession of marijuana. Before trial, T.L.O. moved to suppress evidence discovered in the search, but the Court denied her motion. The Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court of New Jersey, Middlesex County found her guilty and sentenced her to probation for one year. On appeal, the Superior Court of New Jersey,Appellate
{{META.FULLTITLE}}
Unanimous decision for McCullenmajority opinion by John G. Roberts, Jr. The First Amendment prohibits laws restricting speech surrounding abortion clinic locations. Yes, unanswered. Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. delivered the opinion for the 9-0 majority. The Court held that the Massachusetts law was content-neutral on its facebecause a
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA V. HELLER Dick Anthony Heller was a D.C. special police officer who was authorized to carry a handgun while on duty. He applied for a one-year license for a handgun he wished to keep at home, but his application was denied. Heller sued the District of Columbia. He sought an injunction against the enforcement of the relevant parts of the Codeand argued
MILLER V. ALABAMA
Miller filed a post trial motion for a new trial, arguing that sentencing a 14-year-old to life without the possibility of parole constituted cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The trial court denied the motion. On appeal, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the lower court's decision. OYEZCASESJUSTICESABOUTTOURARGUMENT 2.0LAWYER DIRECTORY A multimedia judicial archive of the Supreme Court of the UnitedStates.
{{META.FULLTITLE}}
About; License; Lawyer Directory; Projects. Shifting Scales; Body Politic; Tour; Site Feedback; Support Oyez & LII; LII Supreme Court Resources; Justia Supreme Court SEILA LAW LLC V. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU A case in which the Court held that the vesting of substantial executive authority in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an independent agency led by a single director, violates the separation of powers, but the statutory provision creating that violation, 12 U.S.C. § 5491(c)(3) is severable from the Dodd-Frank Act. MONTGOMERY V. LOUISIANA The Supreme Court had jurisdiction to review the Louisiana Supreme Court’s decision, and the Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v.Alabama, which prohibits sentencing schemes that impose a punishment of mandatory life without parole for juvenile offenders convicted of homicide, applied retroactively.Justice Anthony M. Kennedy delivered the opinion for the 6-3 majority. KATZENBACH V. MCCLUNG In a unanimous decision authored by Justice Clark, the Court held McClung could be barred from discriminating against African Americans under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Court reasoned that discrimination in restaurants posed significant burdens on "the interstate flow of food and upon the movement on products generally."EISENSTADT V. BAIRD
Facts of the case. William Baird gave away Emko Vaginal Foam to a woman following his Boston University lecture on birth control and over-population. Massachusetts charged Baird with a felony, to distribute contraceptives to unmarried men or women. Under the law, only married couples could obtain contraceptives; only registereddoctors or
NEW JERSEY V. T.L.O. T.L.O. was charged with possession of marijuana. Before trial, T.L.O. moved to suppress evidence discovered in the search, but the Court denied her motion. The Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court of New Jersey, Middlesex County found her guilty and sentenced her to probation for one year. On appeal, the Superior Court of New Jersey,Appellate
{{META.FULLTITLE}}
Unanimous decision for McCullenmajority opinion by John G. Roberts, Jr. The First Amendment prohibits laws restricting speech surrounding abortion clinic locations. Yes, unanswered. Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. delivered the opinion for the 9-0 majority. The Court held that the Massachusetts law was content-neutral on its facebecause a
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA V. HELLER Dick Anthony Heller was a D.C. special police officer who was authorized to carry a handgun while on duty. He applied for a one-year license for a handgun he wished to keep at home, but his application was denied. Heller sued the District of Columbia. He sought an injunction against the enforcement of the relevant parts of the Codeand argued
MILLER V. ALABAMA
Miller filed a post trial motion for a new trial, arguing that sentencing a 14-year-old to life without the possibility of parole constituted cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The trial court denied the motion. On appeal, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the lower court's decision. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA V. HELLER Dick Anthony Heller was a D.C. special police officer who was authorized to carry a handgun while on duty. He applied for a one-year license for a handgun he wished to keep at home, but his application was denied. Heller sued the District of Columbia. He sought an injunction against the enforcement of the relevant parts of the Codeand argued
CITIZENS UNITED V. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Citizens United sought an injunction against the Federal Election Commission in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia to prevent the application of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) to its film Hillary: The Movie.The Movie expressed opinions about whether Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton would make a good president.. In an attempt to regulate "big money" campaignMIRANDA V. ARIZONA
The written confession was admitted into evidence at trial despite the objection of the defense attorney and the fact that the police officers admitted that they had not advised Miranda of his right to have an attorney present during the interrogation. The jury found Miranda guilty. On appeal, the Supreme Court of Arizona affirmed andheld that
BRANDENBURG V. OHIO
Brandenburg, a leader in the Ku Klux Klan, made a speech at a Klan rally and was later convicted under an Ohio criminal syndicalism law. The law made illegal advocating "crime, sabotage, violence, or unlawful methods of terrorism as a means of accomplishing industrial or political reform," as well as assembling "with any society, group, or assemblage of persons formed to teach or advocate the OBERGEFELL V. HODGES Justice Anthony M. Kennedy delivered the opinion for the 5-4 majority. The Court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees the right to marry as one of the fundamental liberties it protects, and that analysis applies to same-sex couples in the same manner as it does to opposite-sex couples.BAKER V. CARR
Facts of the case. Charles W. Baker and other Tennessee citizens alleged that a 1901 law designed to apportion the seats for the state's General Assembly was virtually ignored. Baker's suit detailed how Tennessee's reapportionment efforts ignored significant economicgrowth and
SHAW V. RENO
A case in which the Court held that the redistricting of North Carolina was evidence of an attempt to separate voters based on race, and thus raised a constitutional issue under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. GRUTTER V. BOLLINGER Facts of the case. In 1997, Barbara Grutter, a white resident of Michigan, applied for admission to the University of Michigan Law School. Grutter applied with a 3.8 undergraduate GPA and an LSAT score of 161. She was denied admission. BOSTOCK V. CLAYTON COUNTY Facts of the case. Gerald Bostock, a gay man, began working for Clayton County, Georgia, as a child welfare services coordinator in 2003. During his ten-year career with Clayton County, Bostock received positive performance evaluations and numerous accolades. In 2013, Bostock began participating in a gay recreational softball league. GIDEON V. WAINWRIGHT Gideon represented himself in trial. He was found guilty and sentenced to five years in prison. Gideon filed a habeas corpus petition in the Florida Supreme Court, arguing that the trial court's decision violated his constitutional right to be represented by counsel. The* Oyez
* About
* License
* Lawyer Directory
* Projects
* Shifting Scales
* Body Politic
* Site Feedback
* Support Oyez & LII * LII Supreme Court Resources * Justia Supreme Court Center* Cases
* Justices
* Tour
* News
* Cases
* Justices
* About
* License
* Site Feedback
* Support
* Tour
* News
* Projects
* Shifting Scales
* Body Politic
* Lawyer Directory
* LII Supreme Court Resources * Justia Supreme Court CenterDetails
Copyright © 2024 ArchiveBay.com. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | DMCA | 2021 | Feedback | Advertising | RSS 2.0