Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
More Annotations
A complete backup of czechgaysolarium.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of zapinterlations.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of bigoliveapkmod.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of queenletiziastyle.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of smashingpumpkins.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of biologyjunction.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Favourite Annotations
A complete backup of https://shariceforcongress.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://brokersindex.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://insidethe49.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://dytron.eu
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://petcareplus.net
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://bigfestival.com.br
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://skpari.ru
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://xplus.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://titaniumpartybus.ca
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://gta-real.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://travelhudsonvalley.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://gwinstek.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Text
started.
ROE V. WADE / EXCERPTS FROM MAJORITY OPINION LandmarkCases.org . Roe v. Wade / Excerpts from Majority Opinion © 2020 Street Law, Inc. 3 . 3. How is the right to privacy in the abortion context different from UNITED STATES V. NIXON (1974) tapes. A federal court ordered the president to do so. The special prosecutor asked the Supreme Court of the United States to hear thecase instead.
BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF TOPEKA / CARTOON ANALYSIS 3. What is the artist’s message in the cartoon? Is there political bias? The message of the cartoon is that the Supreme Court's decision in Brown will have an explosive impact. HAZELWOOD V. KUHLMEIER / EXCERPTS FROM THE DISSENTING OPINION was a “forum” for student expression. From what you read in the majority opinion, why is this an important distinction? 2. What does Justice Brennan fear will happen if schools are permitted to censormaterial that
LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASESHAZELWOOD V. KUHLMEIERGIDEON V. WAINWRIGHTMIRANDA V. ARIZONABROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION × New look. Same great content. LandmarkCases.org got a makeover! As part of this update, you must now use a Street Law Store account to access hundreds of resources and Supreme Court case summaries. Sign up for an account today; it's free and easy!. All accounts for the previous LandmarkCases.org site have been taken out of service. UNITED STATES V. NIXON President Nixon claimed executive privilege and refused to hand over the tapes. President Nixon’s incomplete compliance with the special prosecutor’s demands was challenged and eventually taken to the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court decided that executive privilege is not limitless, and the tapes were released. PLESSY V. FERGUSON / EXCERPTS FROM THE MAJORITY OPINION LandmarkCases.org . Plessy v. Ferguson / Excerpts from the Majority Opinion © 2020 Street Law, Inc. 2 . this be so, it is not by reason of anything found in the act TEXAS V. JOHNSON / EXCERPTS FROM THE DISSENTING OPINION LandmarkCases.org Texas v.Johnson / Excerpts from the Dissenting Opinion © 2020 Street Law, Inc. Last updated: 08/24/2020 . Texas v. Johnson / Excerpts from the HAZELWOOD V. KUHLMEIER / EXCERPTS FROM THE MAJORITY OPINION LandmarkCases.org . Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier / Excerpts from the Majority Opinion © 2020 Street Law, Inc. 3 . 3. What distinction does the Court make between the cases of POLITICAL CARTOON ANALYSIS Cartoon #1. What is the artist’s message in the cartoon? Is there political bias? The message of the cartoon is that the Supreme Court of the United States has awarded victory to those who oppose segregation, possibly finishing the job that President Lincolnstarted.
ROE V. WADE / EXCERPTS FROM MAJORITY OPINION LandmarkCases.org . Roe v. Wade / Excerpts from Majority Opinion © 2020 Street Law, Inc. 3 . 3. How is the right to privacy in the abortion context different from UNITED STATES V. NIXON (1974) tapes. A federal court ordered the president to do so. The special prosecutor asked the Supreme Court of the United States to hear thecase instead.
BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF TOPEKA / CARTOON ANALYSIS 3. What is the artist’s message in the cartoon? Is there political bias? The message of the cartoon is that the Supreme Court's decision in Brown will have an explosive impact. HAZELWOOD V. KUHLMEIER / EXCERPTS FROM THE DISSENTING OPINION was a “forum” for student expression. From what you read in the majority opinion, why is this an important distinction? 2. What does Justice Brennan fear will happen if schools are permitted to censormaterial that
UNITED STATES V. NIXON President Nixon claimed executive privilege and refused to hand over the tapes. President Nixon’s incomplete compliance with the special prosecutor’s demands was challenged and eventually taken to the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court decided that executive privilege is not limitless, and the tapes were released. LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES This case explores the legal concepts of self-incrimination and due process.. Ernesto Miranda was arrested after a victim identified him as her assailant. The police officers who questioned him did not inform him of his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination or of his Sixth Amendment right to the assistance of an attorney. LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES Marbury sued James Madison asking the Supreme Court to issue a writ requiring him to deliver the documents necessary to officially make Marbury justice of the peace. The Supreme Court chose not to answer Marbury’s question, but rather whether they had the jurisdiction to issue the writ. The Marbury v. UNITED STATES V. NIXON / BACKGROUND LandmarkCases.org . United States v. Nixon / Background Reading •• 2020 Street Law, Inc. 3 MIRANDA V. ARIZONA / EXCERPTS FROM THE MAJORITY OPINION LandmarkCases.org . Miranda v. Arizona / Excerpts from the Majority Opinion © 2020 Street Law, Inc. 2 e hold that an individual held for interrogation must be UNITED STATES V. NIXON / BACKGROUND ••—ANSWER KEY conversations to the national security. One might say the courts are exercising executive power. The problem with granting this power solely to the president is that it gives him the NEW JERSEY V. T.L.O. (1985) Street Law Case Summary © 2020 Street Law, Inc. Last updated: 09/17/2020. New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1985) Argued: March 28, 1984 KOREMATSU V. UNITED STATES / EXCERPTS FROM MAJORITY OPINION LandmarkCases.org . Korematsu v. United States / Excerpts from Majority Opinion © 2020 Street Law, Inc. 2 . prevention of espionageand sabotage.
BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF TOPEKA / HOW A DISSENT CAN LandmarkCases.org Brown v.Board of Education of Topeka / How a Dissent Can Presage a Ruling © 2020 Street Law, Inc. Last updated: 07/09/2020 OBERGEFELL V. HODGES / EXCERPTS FROM THE DISSENTING OPINIONS 1. Do you agree with Chief Justice Robert’s assertion that the Court should not make policy? Why or why not? 2. Would the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause allow states to LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASESHAZELWOOD V. KUHLMEIERGIDEON V. WAINWRIGHTMIRANDA V. ARIZONABROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION × New look. Same great content. LandmarkCases.org got a makeover! As part of this update, you must now use a Street Law Store account to access hundreds of resources and Supreme Court case summaries. Sign up for an account today; it's free and easy!. All accounts for the previous LandmarkCases.org site have been taken out of service. LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES 1010 Wayne Avenue, Suite 870 Silver Spring, Maryland 20910, U.S.A. Tel. +1 301-589-1130 Fax +1 301-589-1131 learnmore@streetlaw.org HAZELWOOD V. KUHLMEIER This case explores the legal concepts of freedom of speech and freedom of press.. Hazelwood East High School Principal Robert Reynolds reviewed Spectrum, the school’s student-written newspaper, before publication.In May 1983, he decided to have certain pages pulled because of the sensitive content in two of the articles and acted quickly to remove them in order to meet the paper’s TEXAS V. JOHNSON / EXCERPTS FROM THE DISSENTING OPINIONTEXAS V JOHNSON CONCURRING OPINIONTEXAS V JOHNSON MAJORITY OPINION ARTICLETEXAS V JOHNSON QUIZLETTEXAS V JOHNSON SUPREME COURT DECISIONOYEZ TEXAS V JOHNSONTEXAS VS JOHNSON DEFENDANT CASE LandmarkCases.org Texas v.Johnson / Excerpts from the Dissenting Opinion © 2020 Street Law, Inc. Last updated: 08/24/2020 . Texas v. Johnson / Excerpts from the OBERGEFELL V. HODGES / EXCERPTS FROM THE DISSENTING OPINIONS 1. Do you agree with Chief Justice Robert’s assertion that the Court should not make policy? Why or why not? 2. Would the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause allow states to MARBURY V. MADISON / WHO SHOULD DECIDE?— ANSWER KEY LandmarkCases.org . Marbury v. Madison / Who Should Decide? © 2020 Street Law, Inc. 2 . The people can file a suit urging the courts to declare the law unconstitutional. MARBURY V. MADISO N / EXCERPTS FROM THE UNANIMOUS OPINION LandmarkCases.org . Marbury v. Madison / Excerpts from the Unanimous Opinion © 2020 Street Law, Inc. 2 . These circumstances certainly concur in this case. UNITED STATES V. NIXON / BACKGROUND ••—ANSWER KEY conversations to the national security. One might say the courts are exercising executive power. The problem with granting this power solely to the president is that it gives him the KOREMATSU V. UNITED STATES / EXCERPTS FROM DISSENTING 4. Justice Murphy accuses the American government of engaging in the same type of racism and discrimination as the United States’ WorldWar II enemies.
NEW JERSEY V. T.L.O. / YOU DECIDE: IS THIS A LEGAL SCHOOL The answer depends on how they received the report but most likely the search is legal. The search is permissible so long as there are "are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the search will turn up evidence that the student has violated or is LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASESHAZELWOOD V. KUHLMEIERGIDEON V. WAINWRIGHTMIRANDA V. ARIZONABROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION × New look. Same great content. LandmarkCases.org got a makeover! As part of this update, you must now use a Street Law Store account to access hundreds of resources and Supreme Court case summaries. Sign up for an account today; it's free and easy!. All accounts for the previous LandmarkCases.org site have been taken out of service. LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES 1010 Wayne Avenue, Suite 870 Silver Spring, Maryland 20910, U.S.A. Tel. +1 301-589-1130 Fax +1 301-589-1131 learnmore@streetlaw.org HAZELWOOD V. KUHLMEIER This case explores the legal concepts of freedom of speech and freedom of press.. Hazelwood East High School Principal Robert Reynolds reviewed Spectrum, the school’s student-written newspaper, before publication.In May 1983, he decided to have certain pages pulled because of the sensitive content in two of the articles and acted quickly to remove them in order to meet the paper’s TEXAS V. JOHNSON / EXCERPTS FROM THE DISSENTING OPINIONTEXAS V JOHNSON CONCURRING OPINIONTEXAS V JOHNSON MAJORITY OPINION ARTICLETEXAS V JOHNSON QUIZLETTEXAS V JOHNSON SUPREME COURT DECISIONOYEZ TEXAS V JOHNSONTEXAS VS JOHNSON DEFENDANT CASE LandmarkCases.org Texas v.Johnson / Excerpts from the Dissenting Opinion © 2020 Street Law, Inc. Last updated: 08/24/2020 . Texas v. Johnson / Excerpts from the OBERGEFELL V. HODGES / EXCERPTS FROM THE DISSENTING OPINIONS 1. Do you agree with Chief Justice Robert’s assertion that the Court should not make policy? Why or why not? 2. Would the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause allow states to MARBURY V. MADISON / WHO SHOULD DECIDE?— ANSWER KEY LandmarkCases.org . Marbury v. Madison / Who Should Decide? © 2020 Street Law, Inc. 2 . The people can file a suit urging the courts to declare the law unconstitutional. MARBURY V. MADISO N / EXCERPTS FROM THE UNANIMOUS OPINION LandmarkCases.org . Marbury v. Madison / Excerpts from the Unanimous Opinion © 2020 Street Law, Inc. 2 . These circumstances certainly concur in this case. UNITED STATES V. NIXON / BACKGROUND ••—ANSWER KEY conversations to the national security. One might say the courts are exercising executive power. The problem with granting this power solely to the president is that it gives him the KOREMATSU V. UNITED STATES / EXCERPTS FROM DISSENTING 4. Justice Murphy accuses the American government of engaging in the same type of racism and discrimination as the United States’ WorldWar II enemies.
NEW JERSEY V. T.L.O. / YOU DECIDE: IS THIS A LEGAL SCHOOL The answer depends on how they received the report but most likely the search is legal. The search is permissible so long as there are "are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the search will turn up evidence that the student has violated or is LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES 1010 Wayne Avenue, Suite 870 Silver Spring, Maryland 20910, U.S.A. Tel. +1 301-589-1130 Fax +1 301-589-1131 learnmore@streetlaw.org HAZELWOOD V. KUHLMEIER This case explores the legal concepts of freedom of speech and freedom of press.. Hazelwood East High School Principal Robert Reynolds reviewed Spectrum, the school’s student-written newspaper, before publication.In May 1983, he decided to have certain pages pulled because of the sensitive content in two of the articles and acted quickly to remove them in order to meet the paper’s LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES Marbury sued James Madison asking the Supreme Court to issue a writ requiring him to deliver the documents necessary to officially make Marbury justice of the peace. The Supreme Court chose not to answer Marbury’s question, but rather whether they had the jurisdiction to issue the writ. The Marbury v. LESSON PLAN / THE 14TH AMENDMENT’S EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE Slaughter-House Cases were the first major cases in which the U.S. Supreme Court interpreted the 14th Amendment. The Court decided, in these cases, that the federal government could not protect all civilrights—only those
UNITED STATES V. NIXON / PRESIDENT CLINTON: THE PRESIDENT LandmarkCases.org . United States v. Nixon / President Clinton: The President as Defendant © 2020 Street Law, Inc. 2 . in civil litigation involving their actions UNITED STATES V. NIXON / BACKGROUND LandmarkCases.org . United States v. Nixon / Background Reading •• 2020 Street Law, Inc. 3 MCCULLOCH V. MARYLAND / FEDERALISM ACTIVITY Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution Enumerated Powers of Congress The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts UNITED STATES V. NIXON / ANALYZING ORAL ARGUMENT QUESTIONS LandmarkCases.org United States v. Nixon / Analyzing Oral ArgumentQuestions
PLESSY V. FERGUSON / BACKGROUND —ANSWER KEY 3. Judge Ferguson decided that the state could make laws for railroad companies that traveled within the state but not for those that traveled between states. APPLYING PRECEDENTS ACTIVITY—ANSWER KEY The journalism students felt that this censorship from the school authorities violated their First Amendment rights to a free press. The students sued the school district in federal court, and the LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASESHAZELWOOD V. KUHLMEIERGIDEON V. WAINWRIGHTMIRANDA V. ARIZONABROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION × New look. Same great content. LandmarkCases.org got a makeover! As part of this update, you must now use a Street Law Store account to access hundreds of resources and Supreme Court case summaries. Sign up for an account today; it's free and easy!. All accounts for the previous LandmarkCases.org site have been taken out of service. LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES 1010 Wayne Avenue, Suite 870 Silver Spring, Maryland 20910, U.S.A. Tel. +1 301-589-1130 Fax +1 301-589-1131 learnmore@streetlaw.org HAZELWOOD V. KUHLMEIER This case explores the legal concepts of freedom of speech and freedom of press.. Hazelwood East High School Principal Robert Reynolds reviewed Spectrum, the school’s student-written newspaper, before publication.In May 1983, he decided to have certain pages pulled because of the sensitive content in two of the articles and acted quickly to remove them in order to meet the paper’s TEXAS V. JOHNSON / EXCERPTS FROM THE DISSENTING OPINIONTEXAS V JOHNSON CONCURRING OPINIONTEXAS V JOHNSON MAJORITY OPINION ARTICLETEXAS V JOHNSON QUIZLETTEXAS V JOHNSON SUPREME COURT DECISIONOYEZ TEXAS V JOHNSONTEXAS VS JOHNSON DEFENDANT CASE LandmarkCases.org Texas v.Johnson / Excerpts from the Dissenting Opinion © 2020 Street Law, Inc. Last updated: 08/24/2020 . Texas v. Johnson / Excerpts from the OBERGEFELL V. HODGES / EXCERPTS FROM THE DISSENTING OPINIONS 1. Do you agree with Chief Justice Robert’s assertion that the Court should not make policy? Why or why not? 2. Would the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause allow states to MARBURY V. MADISON / WHO SHOULD DECIDE?— ANSWER KEY LandmarkCases.org . Marbury v. Madison / Who Should Decide? © 2020 Street Law, Inc. 2 . The people can file a suit urging the courts to declare the law unconstitutional. MARBURY V. MADISO N / EXCERPTS FROM THE UNANIMOUS OPINION LandmarkCases.org . Marbury v. Madison / Excerpts from the Unanimous Opinion © 2020 Street Law, Inc. 2 . These circumstances certainly concur in this case. UNITED STATES V. NIXON / BACKGROUND ••—ANSWER KEY conversations to the national security. One might say the courts are exercising executive power. The problem with granting this power solely to the president is that it gives him the KOREMATSU V. UNITED STATES / EXCERPTS FROM DISSENTING 4. Justice Murphy accuses the American government of engaging in the same type of racism and discrimination as the United States’ WorldWar II enemies.
NEW JERSEY V. T.L.O. / YOU DECIDE: IS THIS A LEGAL SCHOOL The answer depends on how they received the report but most likely the search is legal. The search is permissible so long as there are "are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the search will turn up evidence that the student has violated or is LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASESHAZELWOOD V. KUHLMEIERGIDEON V. WAINWRIGHTMIRANDA V. ARIZONABROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION × New look. Same great content. LandmarkCases.org got a makeover! As part of this update, you must now use a Street Law Store account to access hundreds of resources and Supreme Court case summaries. Sign up for an account today; it's free and easy!. All accounts for the previous LandmarkCases.org site have been taken out of service. LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES 1010 Wayne Avenue, Suite 870 Silver Spring, Maryland 20910, U.S.A. Tel. +1 301-589-1130 Fax +1 301-589-1131 learnmore@streetlaw.org HAZELWOOD V. KUHLMEIER This case explores the legal concepts of freedom of speech and freedom of press.. Hazelwood East High School Principal Robert Reynolds reviewed Spectrum, the school’s student-written newspaper, before publication.In May 1983, he decided to have certain pages pulled because of the sensitive content in two of the articles and acted quickly to remove them in order to meet the paper’s TEXAS V. JOHNSON / EXCERPTS FROM THE DISSENTING OPINIONTEXAS V JOHNSON CONCURRING OPINIONTEXAS V JOHNSON MAJORITY OPINION ARTICLETEXAS V JOHNSON QUIZLETTEXAS V JOHNSON SUPREME COURT DECISIONOYEZ TEXAS V JOHNSONTEXAS VS JOHNSON DEFENDANT CASE LandmarkCases.org Texas v.Johnson / Excerpts from the Dissenting Opinion © 2020 Street Law, Inc. Last updated: 08/24/2020 . Texas v. Johnson / Excerpts from the OBERGEFELL V. HODGES / EXCERPTS FROM THE DISSENTING OPINIONS 1. Do you agree with Chief Justice Robert’s assertion that the Court should not make policy? Why or why not? 2. Would the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause allow states to MARBURY V. MADISON / WHO SHOULD DECIDE?— ANSWER KEY LandmarkCases.org . Marbury v. Madison / Who Should Decide? © 2020 Street Law, Inc. 2 . The people can file a suit urging the courts to declare the law unconstitutional. MARBURY V. MADISO N / EXCERPTS FROM THE UNANIMOUS OPINION LandmarkCases.org . Marbury v. Madison / Excerpts from the Unanimous Opinion © 2020 Street Law, Inc. 2 . These circumstances certainly concur in this case. UNITED STATES V. NIXON / BACKGROUND ••—ANSWER KEY conversations to the national security. One might say the courts are exercising executive power. The problem with granting this power solely to the president is that it gives him the KOREMATSU V. UNITED STATES / EXCERPTS FROM DISSENTING 4. Justice Murphy accuses the American government of engaging in the same type of racism and discrimination as the United States’ WorldWar II enemies.
NEW JERSEY V. T.L.O. / YOU DECIDE: IS THIS A LEGAL SCHOOL The answer depends on how they received the report but most likely the search is legal. The search is permissible so long as there are "are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the search will turn up evidence that the student has violated or is LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES 1010 Wayne Avenue, Suite 870 Silver Spring, Maryland 20910, U.S.A. Tel. +1 301-589-1130 Fax +1 301-589-1131 learnmore@streetlaw.org HAZELWOOD V. KUHLMEIER This case explores the legal concepts of freedom of speech and freedom of press.. Hazelwood East High School Principal Robert Reynolds reviewed Spectrum, the school’s student-written newspaper, before publication.In May 1983, he decided to have certain pages pulled because of the sensitive content in two of the articles and acted quickly to remove them in order to meet the paper’s LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES Marbury sued James Madison asking the Supreme Court to issue a writ requiring him to deliver the documents necessary to officially make Marbury justice of the peace. The Supreme Court chose not to answer Marbury’s question, but rather whether they had the jurisdiction to issue the writ. The Marbury v. LESSON PLAN / THE 14TH AMENDMENT’S EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE Slaughter-House Cases were the first major cases in which the U.S. Supreme Court interpreted the 14th Amendment. The Court decided, in these cases, that the federal government could not protect all civilrights—only those
UNITED STATES V. NIXON / PRESIDENT CLINTON: THE PRESIDENT LandmarkCases.org . United States v. Nixon / President Clinton: The President as Defendant © 2020 Street Law, Inc. 2 . in civil litigation involving their actions UNITED STATES V. NIXON / BACKGROUND LandmarkCases.org . United States v. Nixon / Background Reading •• 2020 Street Law, Inc. 3 MCCULLOCH V. MARYLAND / FEDERALISM ACTIVITY Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution Enumerated Powers of Congress The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts UNITED STATES V. NIXON / ANALYZING ORAL ARGUMENT QUESTIONS LandmarkCases.org United States v. Nixon / Analyzing Oral ArgumentQuestions
PLESSY V. FERGUSON / BACKGROUND —ANSWER KEY 3. Judge Ferguson decided that the state could make laws for railroad companies that traveled within the state but not for those that traveled between states. APPLYING PRECEDENTS ACTIVITY—ANSWER KEY The journalism students felt that this censorship from the school authorities violated their First Amendment rights to a free press. The students sued the school district in federal court, and the×
NEW LOOK. SAME GREAT CONTENT. LandmarkCases.org got a makeover! As part of this update, YOU MUST NOW USE A STREET LAW STORE ACCOUNT to access hundreds of resources and Supreme Court case summaries. Sign up for an account today ; it's free and easy! All accounts for the previous LandmarkCases.org site have been takenout of service.
We apologize for any inconvenience, but hope that having only one Street Law account to remember will make your life easier. You can reach us at landmarkcases@streetlaw.org with any questions.* About
* Site Credits
* Using the Site
* Legal Concepts
* Teaching Strategies* Glossary
LANDMARKCASES.ORG PROVIDES TEACHERS WITH FREE RESOURCES AND ACTIVITIESTO SUPPORT
THE TEACHING OF LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES.THE CASES
BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION School Segregation, Equal Protection DRED SCOTT V. SANDFORD Slavery, Due Process, Missouri Compromise ENGEL V. VITALE - NEW CASE Prayer in School, Freedom of Religion, Separation of Church and StateGIBBONS V. OGDEN
States' Rights, Commerce Clause GIDEON V. WAINWRIGHT Right to Counsel, Due Process HAZELWOOD V. KUHLMEIER Censorship, Student Speech KOREMATSU V. UNITED STATES Japanese Internment, Equal ProtectionMAPP V. OHIO
Search & Seizure, Exclusionary Rule, Due ProcessMARBURY V. MADISON
Judicial Review, Federalism, Separation of Powers MCCULLOCH V. MARYLAND State Taxes, National SupremacyMIRANDA V. ARIZONA
Self-Incrimination, Due Process NEW JERSEY V. T.L.O. Student Search & Seizure OBERGEFELL V. HODGES - NEW CASE Marriage Equality, Federalism, Equal ProtectionPLESSY V. FERGUSON
Equal Protection, "Separate but Equal" REGENTS OF THE U. OF CALIFORNIA V. BAKKE Affirmative Action, Equal ProtectionROE V. WADE
Abortion, Right to Privacy SCHENCK V. UNITED STATES - NEW CASE Freedom of Speech, Military DraftTEXAS V. JOHNSON
Flag Burning, Freedom of Speech TINKER V. DES MOINES Student Speech, Symbolic Speech UNITED STATES V. NIXON Watergate, Executive Privilege, Checks & Balances NEWS FROM STREET LAW AND THE SUPREME COURT HISTORICAL SOCIETY*
SCOTUS Case Materials from the Current Term The most teachable cases from the Term so far. Download today!Read More
*
Supreme Court Institute Application Now Open Apply now and join Street Law and the Supreme Court HistoricalSociety
for 6 days of teacher professional development in the heart ofWashington, D.C.
Read More
*
Middle School Case Packs Case packs for landmark SCOTUS rulings developed specifically for middle school studentsRead More
*
NEW Documentary
The Supreme Court and the 1876 Election This documentary tells the story of the contested Hayes-Tildenelection.
This 15-minute documentary is intended for high school teachers to usein the classroom.
Read More
*
Supreme Court Historical Society New York Gala Honoring - Michael R. Bloomberg Extraordinary business person, philanthropist, author, and publicservant
Read More
2019-20 SCOTUS Term
2021 Supreme Court Summer Institute for Teachers Middle School Case Packs The Supreme Court and the 1876 Election Supreme Court Historical Society New York Gala Street Law, Inc. advances justice through classroom and community education programs that empower people with the legal and civic knowledge, skills, and confidence to bring about positive change for themselves and others.Learn More
The Supreme Court Historical Society is dedicated to the collection and preservation of the history of the Supreme Court.Learn More
MORE RESOURCES & TEACHING MATERIALS FROM STREET LAW, INC. FREE RESOURCE LIBRARYTEXTBOOKS
PUBLICATIONS
TEACHER PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENTABOUT STREET LAW
DEVELOPED AND OPERATED BY: 1010 Wayne Avenue, Suite 870 Silver Spring, Maryland 20910, U.S.A. Tel. +1 301-589-1130Fax +1 301-589-1131
learnmore@streetlaw.org IN PARTNERSHIP WITH: 224 East Capitol St. NE Washington, DC 20003Tel. 202-543-0400
Fax 202-547-7730
SUPPORTED BY:
The LandmarkCases.org site has been made possible in part by a major grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities: Exploring thehuman endeavor.
Any views, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this site do not necessarily represent those of the National Endowment forthe Humanities.
About
Using the Site
Legal Concepts
Teaching Strategies
Glossary
__ __
__ __
2020 Street Law, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Site Designed by DC Web Designers, a Washington DC web designcompany.
* About
* About
* Site Credits
* Using the Site
* Legal Concepts
* Teaching Strategies* Glossary
__
Details
Copyright © 2024 ArchiveBay.com. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | DMCA | 2021 | Feedback | Advertising | RSS 2.0