Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
More Annotations
A complete backup of lirikterjemahan.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of brotherdriversupport.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Favourite Annotations
A complete backup of https://giftofvision.org
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://trendcounter.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://learntotrade.com.au
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://thepostmillennial.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://goanimate.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://eivans.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://finestwallpaper.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://rauchmoebel.de
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://unitheme.net
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Text
JACK OF KENT
British politics is currently exciting, with resignations and the prospects of leadership challenges. But when the excitement passes, there are certain brute facts about Brexit and the draft withdrawal agreement which will still be there. ABOUT DAVID ALLEN GREEN He is also able to speak, lecture, and train on legal and media subjects – from seminars and conferences to pub talks and after-dinner speeches. David is currently writing a ‘popular law’ book on privacy. Email: jackofkent@gmail.com. Twitter:@davidallengreen.
NIGHTJACK – RESOURCE PAGE – JACK OF KENT NightJack – resource page. This is the resource page for anyone following the NightJack story. This resource page will be updated from time to time. Comments and suggestions welcome. My narrative of what happened is now at the New Statesman. The original NightJack blog (February 2008 to April 2009) was pulled down when the Timesthreatened to
WHY DID GEORGE ORWELL CALL HIS LAST NOVEL NINETEEN EIGHTY Why did George Orwell call his last novel Nineteen Eighty-Four?. The usual explanation for the choice of title of Nineteen Eighty-Four is that it was a play on the last two digits of 1948, the year the manuscript was finished.. This has never convinced me. I think there may be a better explanation, which comes from George Orwell’s intellectual hostility to the Catholic writer G. K. Chesterton.DANIEL MORGAN
Daniel Morgan was murdered in 1987. Five successive police investigations failed to result in any successful prosecution. There is wide concern that the investigations were compromised by police corruption. There is also an allegation that the News of the World (a client of one of the suspects) was involved at one point in thesurveillance of
THE CONTEXTS OF THATCHER’S BRUGES SPEECH OF 1988 1988 was four years before 1992, and at the time the latter seemed a more significant date for Europe. “1992” was the shorthand for a campaign of awareness of the completion (or supposed completion) of the Single Market. In April 1988, five months before the Bruges speech, Thatcher launched the “1992” campaign at Lancaster House.FEBRUARY 2012
February 29, 2012 by Daniel Allen Green. I have recently become interested in the case of Daniel Morgan, who was killed in March 1987. Morgan worked as a private investigator. His business partner was Jonathan Rees, who later became one of the main private investigators used by Fleet Street.“EXCLUSIVE”
In researching around the Ministry of Justice’s Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Saudis, I came across a curious piece of information. (ADD, 3rd October 2015: A “Memorandum of Understanding” is a formal agreement, but usually one that is not intended to be contractual binding.) THE SEVEN HURDLES FOR REPEAL OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT The new Conservative government wants to repeal the Human Right Act 1998 (the “Act”) and replace with a “British Bill of Rights”. The intention appears to be to do this in “one hundred days”. LEEDS CROWN COURT: R V SARAH CATT Mr Justice Cooke’s sentencing remarks from this morning at Leeds Crown Court: Sentencing remarks: SARAH LOUISE CATT. 1. You have pleaded guilty to administering Misoprostol to yourself with intent to procure your own miscarriage. You are entitled to credit for that plea and generously, I give you the full 1/3 credit although you maintainedJACK OF KENT
British politics is currently exciting, with resignations and the prospects of leadership challenges. But when the excitement passes, there are certain brute facts about Brexit and the draft withdrawal agreement which will still be there. ABOUT DAVID ALLEN GREEN He is also able to speak, lecture, and train on legal and media subjects – from seminars and conferences to pub talks and after-dinner speeches. David is currently writing a ‘popular law’ book on privacy. Email: jackofkent@gmail.com. Twitter:@davidallengreen.
NIGHTJACK – RESOURCE PAGE – JACK OF KENT NightJack – resource page. This is the resource page for anyone following the NightJack story. This resource page will be updated from time to time. Comments and suggestions welcome. My narrative of what happened is now at the New Statesman. The original NightJack blog (February 2008 to April 2009) was pulled down when the Timesthreatened to
WHY DID GEORGE ORWELL CALL HIS LAST NOVEL NINETEEN EIGHTY Why did George Orwell call his last novel Nineteen Eighty-Four?. The usual explanation for the choice of title of Nineteen Eighty-Four is that it was a play on the last two digits of 1948, the year the manuscript was finished.. This has never convinced me. I think there may be a better explanation, which comes from George Orwell’s intellectual hostility to the Catholic writer G. K. Chesterton.DANIEL MORGAN
Daniel Morgan was murdered in 1987. Five successive police investigations failed to result in any successful prosecution. There is wide concern that the investigations were compromised by police corruption. There is also an allegation that the News of the World (a client of one of the suspects) was involved at one point in thesurveillance of
THE CONTEXTS OF THATCHER’S BRUGES SPEECH OF 1988 1988 was four years before 1992, and at the time the latter seemed a more significant date for Europe. “1992” was the shorthand for a campaign of awareness of the completion (or supposed completion) of the Single Market. In April 1988, five months before the Bruges speech, Thatcher launched the “1992” campaign at Lancaster House.FEBRUARY 2012
February 29, 2012 by Daniel Allen Green. I have recently become interested in the case of Daniel Morgan, who was killed in March 1987. Morgan worked as a private investigator. His business partner was Jonathan Rees, who later became one of the main private investigators used by Fleet Street.“EXCLUSIVE”
In researching around the Ministry of Justice’s Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Saudis, I came across a curious piece of information. (ADD, 3rd October 2015: A “Memorandum of Understanding” is a formal agreement, but usually one that is not intended to be contractual binding.) THE SEVEN HURDLES FOR REPEAL OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT The new Conservative government wants to repeal the Human Right Act 1998 (the “Act”) and replace with a “British Bill of Rights”. The intention appears to be to do this in “one hundred days”. LEEDS CROWN COURT: R V SARAH CATT Mr Justice Cooke’s sentencing remarks from this morning at Leeds Crown Court: Sentencing remarks: SARAH LOUISE CATT. 1. You have pleaded guilty to administering Misoprostol to yourself with intent to procure your own miscarriage. You are entitled to credit for that plea and generously, I give you the full 1/3 credit although you maintained HORTON’S CLAIM AGAINST THE TIMES Horton’s claim against the Times. On 11 April 2012, a claim form was issued in the Chancery Division of the High Court by Richard Horton against Times Newspapers Limited. (Guardian story here .) I understand Horton was forced to issue a claim form as the Times did not bother to respond to his formal letter of claim.AUGUST 2012
August 23, 2019. August 22, 2012 by Daniel Allen Green. This is a cross-post from here of a critique of my New Statesman post on Assange’s legal myths, with kind permission of its author x7o. Common misconceptions, recursively. ” Whenever the Julian Assange extradition comes up in the news, many of his supporters make variousconfident
FEBRUARY 2012
February 29, 2012 by Daniel Allen Green. I have recently become interested in the case of Daniel Morgan, who was killed in March 1987. Morgan worked as a private investigator. His business partner was Jonathan Rees, who later became one of the main private investigators used by Fleet Street. JULY 2012 – JACK OF KENT Jesus and the Dinosaurs, and the gullibility of secularists. August 16, 2019. July 2, 2012 by Daniel Allen Green. Yesterday someone posted this picture at the Global Secular Humanist Movement’s Facebook page. The person who added the picture commented “The book is called “Jesus and Dinosaurs” you can order it from Answers in Genesis.NEW WEBSITE!
I have finally got my own website! My intention is to use this new website for blogging as well as for creating detailed resource pages on issues I write about (including BCA v Simon Singh, TwitterJokeTrial, NightJack, Johann Hari, phone and computer hacking, libel and privacy law, and so on). THE PROPOSAL FOR CPS GUIDANCE The Proposal for CPS Guidance. August 23, 2019. September 20, 2012 by Daniel Allen Green. The CPS today announced that there will be a consultation exercise on new social media guidance . I will be blogging on this tomorrow at the New Statesman. But in the meantime, please do share your views on these paragraphs: HOW DO YOU DEFEAT A TURNIP-GHOST? The Oxford English Dictionary defines turnip-ghost as “a simulated ghost or apparition of which the head is formed by a turnip-lantern,” which in turn is defined as “ the hollowed rind of a turnip employed as a lantern; also as a term of abuse”. And it certainly was a term of abuse. Back in the days when all authorsappeared to use
MAY 2012 – JACK OF KENT ” Gentlemen of the free-and-easy sort, who plume themselves on being acquainted with a move or two, and being usually equal to the time-of-day, express the wide range of their capacity for adventure by observing that they are good for anything from pitch-and-toss to manslaughter; between which opposite extremes, no doubt, there lies atolerably wide
WHY DRIP MATTERS
Today the government is going to force the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers (“DRIP”) Bill through the House of Commons.. The intention is that it will be an Act of Parliament by the end of the week. Why should this matter? OPERATION COTTON APPEAL: THE MOJ SKELETON ARGUMENT The purpose of this intervention is to assist the court in the following ways:-. To assure the Court that, in the event the appeal is allowed, the MoJ will ensure that suitably qualified defence advocates will be available within a reasonable time to represent the Defendants. To inform the Court of the urgent steps that the MoJ hastaken and is
JACK OF KENT
British politics is currently exciting, with resignations and the prospects of leadership challenges. But when the excitement passes, there are certain brute facts about Brexit and the draft withdrawal agreement which will still be there. ABOUT DAVID ALLEN GREEN He is also able to speak, lecture, and train on legal and media subjects – from seminars and conferences to pub talks and after-dinner speeches. David is currently writing a ‘popular law’ book on privacy. Email: jackofkent@gmail.com. Twitter:@davidallengreen.
RESOURCES – JACK OF KENT Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * NIGHTJACK – RESOURCE PAGE – JACK OF KENT NightJack – resource page. This is the resource page for anyone following the NightJack story. This resource page will be updated from time to time. Comments and suggestions welcome. My narrative of what happened is now at the New Statesman. The original NightJack blog (February 2008 to April 2009) was pulled down when the Timesthreatened to
HORTON’S CLAIM AGAINST THE TIMES Horton’s claim against the Times. On 11 April 2012, a claim form was issued in the Chancery Division of the High Court by Richard Horton against Times Newspapers Limited. (Guardian story here .) I understand Horton was forced to issue a claim form as the Times did not bother to respond to his formal letter of claim. WHY DID GEORGE ORWELL CALL HIS LAST NOVEL NINETEEN EIGHTY Why did George Orwell call his last novel Nineteen Eighty-Four?. The usual explanation for the choice of title of Nineteen Eighty-Four is that it was a play on the last two digits of 1948, the year the manuscript was finished.. This has never convinced me. I think there may be a better explanation, which comes from George Orwell’s intellectual hostility to the Catholic writer G. K. Chesterton. THE CONTEXTS OF THATCHER’S BRUGES SPEECH OF 1988 1988 was four years before 1992, and at the time the latter seemed a more significant date for Europe. “1992” was the shorthand for a campaign of awareness of the completion (or supposed completion) of the Single Market. In April 1988, five months before the Bruges speech, Thatcher launched the “1992” campaign at Lancaster House.“EXCLUSIVE”
In researching around the Ministry of Justice’s Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Saudis, I came across a curious piece of information. (ADD, 3rd October 2015: A “Memorandum of Understanding” is a formal agreement, but usually one that is not intended to be contractual binding.) LEEDS CROWN COURT: R V SARAH CATT Mr Justice Cooke’s sentencing remarks from this morning at Leeds Crown Court: Sentencing remarks: SARAH LOUISE CATT. 1. You have pleaded guilty to administering Misoprostol to yourself with intent to procure your own miscarriage. You are entitled to credit for that plea and generously, I give you the full 1/3 credit although you maintained “IN SOME POSSIBLE BRANCHES OF THE FUTURE LEAVING WILL BE Yesterday evening, I had a tweet exchange with Dominic Cummings, the architect of the (official) Leave campaign. His candour and opennesswas striking.
JACK OF KENT
British politics is currently exciting, with resignations and the prospects of leadership challenges. But when the excitement passes, there are certain brute facts about Brexit and the draft withdrawal agreement which will still be there. ABOUT DAVID ALLEN GREEN He is also able to speak, lecture, and train on legal and media subjects – from seminars and conferences to pub talks and after-dinner speeches. David is currently writing a ‘popular law’ book on privacy. Email: jackofkent@gmail.com. Twitter:@davidallengreen.
RESOURCES – JACK OF KENT Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * NIGHTJACK – RESOURCE PAGE – JACK OF KENT NightJack – resource page. This is the resource page for anyone following the NightJack story. This resource page will be updated from time to time. Comments and suggestions welcome. My narrative of what happened is now at the New Statesman. The original NightJack blog (February 2008 to April 2009) was pulled down when the Timesthreatened to
HORTON’S CLAIM AGAINST THE TIMES Horton’s claim against the Times. On 11 April 2012, a claim form was issued in the Chancery Division of the High Court by Richard Horton against Times Newspapers Limited. (Guardian story here .) I understand Horton was forced to issue a claim form as the Times did not bother to respond to his formal letter of claim. WHY DID GEORGE ORWELL CALL HIS LAST NOVEL NINETEEN EIGHTY Why did George Orwell call his last novel Nineteen Eighty-Four?. The usual explanation for the choice of title of Nineteen Eighty-Four is that it was a play on the last two digits of 1948, the year the manuscript was finished.. This has never convinced me. I think there may be a better explanation, which comes from George Orwell’s intellectual hostility to the Catholic writer G. K. Chesterton. THE CONTEXTS OF THATCHER’S BRUGES SPEECH OF 1988 1988 was four years before 1992, and at the time the latter seemed a more significant date for Europe. “1992” was the shorthand for a campaign of awareness of the completion (or supposed completion) of the Single Market. In April 1988, five months before the Bruges speech, Thatcher launched the “1992” campaign at Lancaster House.“EXCLUSIVE”
In researching around the Ministry of Justice’s Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Saudis, I came across a curious piece of information. (ADD, 3rd October 2015: A “Memorandum of Understanding” is a formal agreement, but usually one that is not intended to be contractual binding.) LEEDS CROWN COURT: R V SARAH CATT Mr Justice Cooke’s sentencing remarks from this morning at Leeds Crown Court: Sentencing remarks: SARAH LOUISE CATT. 1. You have pleaded guilty to administering Misoprostol to yourself with intent to procure your own miscarriage. You are entitled to credit for that plea and generously, I give you the full 1/3 credit although you maintained “IN SOME POSSIBLE BRANCHES OF THE FUTURE LEAVING WILL BE Yesterday evening, I had a tweet exchange with Dominic Cummings, the architect of the (official) Leave campaign. His candour and opennesswas striking.
RESOURCES – JACK OF KENT Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * HORTON’S CLAIM AGAINST THE TIMES Horton’s claim against the Times. On 11 April 2012, a claim form was issued in the Chancery Division of the High Court by Richard Horton against Times Newspapers Limited. (Guardian story here .) I understand Horton was forced to issue a claim form as the Times did not bother to respond to his formal letter of claim.AUGUST 2012
August 23, 2019. August 22, 2012 by Daniel Allen Green. This is a cross-post from here of a critique of my New Statesman post on Assange’s legal myths, with kind permission of its author x7o. Common misconceptions, recursively. ” Whenever the Julian Assange extradition comes up in the news, many of his supporters make variousconfident
JULY 2018 – JACK OF KENT For some time, one common contention of those supporting Brexit is that the UK should prepare for a “no deal” Brexit. This preparation would, it is asserted, put pressure on the EU in the exit negotiations because the UK could then threaten to walk away rather than accept a bad deal. APRIL 2017 – JACK OF KENT The UK prime minister Theresa May often uses the phrase “getting on with the job” in respect of her government’s approach to Brexit.This in turn
WHY DRIP MATTERS
Today the government is going to force the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers (“DRIP”) Bill through the House of Commons.. The intention is that it will be an Act of Parliament by the end of the week. Why should this matter? THE SEVEN HURDLES FOR REPEAL OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT The new Conservative government wants to repeal the Human Right Act 1998 (the “Act”) and replace with a “British Bill of Rights”. The intention appears to be to do this in “one hundred days”.OCTOBER 2012
As this blog is named after a medieval wizard, this post is a Hallowe’en Special. You would think magic and the law had little in common. After all, old men in elaborate robes adopting solemn tones as they read archaic words in special sequences from old books is, of course, something which would never happen in the modern world. OPERATION COTTON APPEAL: THE MOJ SKELETON ARGUMENT The purpose of this intervention is to assist the court in the following ways:-. To assure the Court that, in the event the appeal is allowed, the MoJ will ensure that suitably qualified defence advocates will be available within a reasonable time to represent the Defendants. To inform the Court of the urgent steps that the MoJ hastaken and is
THE OUTING OF BLOGGERS The immediate background to this question is that blogger and tweeter Quiet Riot Girl was outed last weekend. It turns out this persistent and spirited internet activist is a Dr Eleanor Tams, formerly of Sheffield Hallam University. It was her approach to engagement with those she disagreed with or had taken exception to – widelydescribed as
JACK OF KENT
British politics is currently exciting, with resignations and the prospects of leadership challenges. But when the excitement passes, there are certain brute facts about Brexit and the draft withdrawal agreement which will still be there. ABOUT DAVID ALLEN GREEN He is also able to speak, lecture, and train on legal and media subjects – from seminars and conferences to pub talks and after-dinner speeches. David is currently writing a ‘popular law’ book on privacy. Email: jackofkent@gmail.com. Twitter:@davidallengreen.
NIGHTJACK – RESOURCE PAGE – JACK OF KENT NightJack – resource page. This is the resource page for anyone following the NightJack story. This resource page will be updated from time to time. Comments and suggestions welcome. My narrative of what happened is now at the New Statesman. The original NightJack blog (February 2008 to April 2009) was pulled down when the Timesthreatened to
HORTON’S CLAIM AGAINST THE TIMES Horton’s claim against the Times. On 11 April 2012, a claim form was issued in the Chancery Division of the High Court by Richard Horton against Times Newspapers Limited. (Guardian story here .) I understand Horton was forced to issue a claim form as the Times did not bother to respond to his formal letter of claim. WHY DID GEORGE ORWELL CALL HIS LAST NOVEL NINETEEN EIGHTY Why did George Orwell call his last novel Nineteen Eighty-Four?. The usual explanation for the choice of title of Nineteen Eighty-Four is that it was a play on the last two digits of 1948, the year the manuscript was finished.. This has never convinced me. I think there may be a better explanation, which comes from George Orwell’s intellectual hostility to the Catholic writer G. K. Chesterton. THE CONTEXTS OF THATCHER’S BRUGES SPEECH OF 1988 1988 was four years before 1992, and at the time the latter seemed a more significant date for Europe. “1992” was the shorthand for a campaign of awareness of the completion (or supposed completion) of the Single Market. In April 1988, five months before the Bruges speech, Thatcher launched the “1992” campaign at Lancaster House.“EXCLUSIVE”
In researching around the Ministry of Justice’s Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Saudis, I came across a curious piece of information. (ADD, 3rd October 2015: A “Memorandum of Understanding” is a formal agreement, but usually one that is not intended to be contractual binding.) THE SEVEN HURDLES FOR REPEAL OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT The new Conservative government wants to repeal the Human Right Act 1998 (the “Act”) and replace with a “British Bill of Rights”. The intention appears to be to do this in “one hundred days”. LEEDS CROWN COURT: R V SARAH CATT Mr Justice Cooke’s sentencing remarks from this morning at Leeds Crown Court: Sentencing remarks: SARAH LOUISE CATT. 1. You have pleaded guilty to administering Misoprostol to yourself with intent to procure your own miscarriage. You are entitled to credit for that plea and generously, I give you the full 1/3 credit although you maintained “IN SOME POSSIBLE BRANCHES OF THE FUTURE LEAVING WILL BE Yesterday evening, I had a tweet exchange with Dominic Cummings, the architect of the (official) Leave campaign. His candour and opennesswas striking.
JACK OF KENT
British politics is currently exciting, with resignations and the prospects of leadership challenges. But when the excitement passes, there are certain brute facts about Brexit and the draft withdrawal agreement which will still be there. ABOUT DAVID ALLEN GREEN He is also able to speak, lecture, and train on legal and media subjects – from seminars and conferences to pub talks and after-dinner speeches. David is currently writing a ‘popular law’ book on privacy. Email: jackofkent@gmail.com. Twitter:@davidallengreen.
NIGHTJACK – RESOURCE PAGE – JACK OF KENT NightJack – resource page. This is the resource page for anyone following the NightJack story. This resource page will be updated from time to time. Comments and suggestions welcome. My narrative of what happened is now at the New Statesman. The original NightJack blog (February 2008 to April 2009) was pulled down when the Timesthreatened to
HORTON’S CLAIM AGAINST THE TIMES Horton’s claim against the Times. On 11 April 2012, a claim form was issued in the Chancery Division of the High Court by Richard Horton against Times Newspapers Limited. (Guardian story here .) I understand Horton was forced to issue a claim form as the Times did not bother to respond to his formal letter of claim. WHY DID GEORGE ORWELL CALL HIS LAST NOVEL NINETEEN EIGHTY Why did George Orwell call his last novel Nineteen Eighty-Four?. The usual explanation for the choice of title of Nineteen Eighty-Four is that it was a play on the last two digits of 1948, the year the manuscript was finished.. This has never convinced me. I think there may be a better explanation, which comes from George Orwell’s intellectual hostility to the Catholic writer G. K. Chesterton. THE CONTEXTS OF THATCHER’S BRUGES SPEECH OF 1988 1988 was four years before 1992, and at the time the latter seemed a more significant date for Europe. “1992” was the shorthand for a campaign of awareness of the completion (or supposed completion) of the Single Market. In April 1988, five months before the Bruges speech, Thatcher launched the “1992” campaign at Lancaster House.“EXCLUSIVE”
In researching around the Ministry of Justice’s Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Saudis, I came across a curious piece of information. (ADD, 3rd October 2015: A “Memorandum of Understanding” is a formal agreement, but usually one that is not intended to be contractual binding.) THE SEVEN HURDLES FOR REPEAL OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT The new Conservative government wants to repeal the Human Right Act 1998 (the “Act”) and replace with a “British Bill of Rights”. The intention appears to be to do this in “one hundred days”. LEEDS CROWN COURT: R V SARAH CATT Mr Justice Cooke’s sentencing remarks from this morning at Leeds Crown Court: Sentencing remarks: SARAH LOUISE CATT. 1. You have pleaded guilty to administering Misoprostol to yourself with intent to procure your own miscarriage. You are entitled to credit for that plea and generously, I give you the full 1/3 credit although you maintained “IN SOME POSSIBLE BRANCHES OF THE FUTURE LEAVING WILL BE Yesterday evening, I had a tweet exchange with Dominic Cummings, the architect of the (official) Leave campaign. His candour and opennesswas striking.
RESOURCES – JACK OF KENT Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * HORTON’S CLAIM AGAINST THE TIMES Horton’s claim against the Times. On 11 April 2012, a claim form was issued in the Chancery Division of the High Court by Richard Horton against Times Newspapers Limited. (Guardian story here .) I understand Horton was forced to issue a claim form as the Times did not bother to respond to his formal letter of claim.NEW WEBSITE!
I have finally got my own website! My intention is to use this new website for blogging as well as for creating detailed resource pages on issues I write about (including BCA v Simon Singh, TwitterJokeTrial, NightJack, Johann Hari, phone and computer hacking, libel and privacy law, and so on).DANIEL MORGAN
Daniel Morgan was murdered in 1987. Five successive police investigations failed to result in any successful prosecution. There is wide concern that the investigations were compromised by police corruption. There is also an allegation that the News of the World (a client of one of the suspects) was involved at one point in thesurveillance of
THE PROPOSAL FOR CPS GUIDANCE The Proposal for CPS Guidance. August 23, 2019. September 20, 2012 by Daniel Allen Green. The CPS today announced that there will be a consultation exercise on new social media guidance . I will be blogging on this tomorrow at the New Statesman. But in the meantime, please do share your views on these paragraphs: WHAT IS A “TURNIP-GHOST”? A POST FOR HALLOWE’EN A turnip-ghost is (or was) an English form of the “Jack-o-Lantern”. “ the hollowed rind of a turnip employed as a lantern; also as a term of abuse”. And it certainly was a term of abuse. Back in the days when all popular authors seemed to use initials, the turnip-ghost was a frequently used image.FEBRUARY 2012
February 29, 2012 by Daniel Allen Green. I have recently become interested in the case of Daniel Morgan, who was killed in March 1987. Morgan worked as a private investigator. His business partner was Jonathan Rees, who later became one of the main private investigators used by Fleet Street. ONE OF THE BEST BLOGGERS IN BRITAIN” Welcome to Jack of Kent, the personal website of liberal journalist and lawyer David Allen Green. You can read the Jack of Kent blog here.My old site is still over at HUMAN RIGHTS ACT AND BINGHAM’S QUESTION: WHICH RIGHTS ARE Freedom of expression.Freedom of assembly and association.The right to marry.The right not to be discriminated against in the enjoyment of those rights.The right not to have our property taken away except in the public interest and with compensation.The right of fair access to the country’s educational system.The right to free elections.JACK OF KENT
British politics is currently exciting, with resignations and the prospects of leadership challenges. But when the excitement passes, there are certain brute facts about Brexit and the draft withdrawal agreement which will still be there.JACK OF KENT
British politics is currently exciting, with resignations and the prospects of leadership challenges. But when the excitement passes, there are certain brute facts about Brexit and the draft withdrawal agreement which will still be there. ABOUT DAVID ALLEN GREEN He is also able to speak, lecture, and train on legal and media subjects – from seminars and conferences to pub talks and after-dinner speeches. David is currently writing a ‘popular law’ book on privacy. Email: jackofkent@gmail.com. Twitter:@davidallengreen.
NIGHTJACK – RESOURCE PAGE – JACK OF KENT NightJack – resource page. This is the resource page for anyone following the NightJack story. This resource page will be updated from time to time. Comments and suggestions welcome. My narrative of what happened is now at the New Statesman. The original NightJack blog (February 2008 to April 2009) was pulled down when the Timesthreatened to
HORTON’S CLAIM AGAINST THE TIMES Horton’s claim against the Times. On 11 April 2012, a claim form was issued in the Chancery Division of the High Court by Richard Horton against Times Newspapers Limited. (Guardian story here .) I understand Horton was forced to issue a claim form as the Times did not bother to respond to his formal letter of claim. WHY DID GEORGE ORWELL CALL HIS LAST NOVEL NINETEEN EIGHTY Why did George Orwell call his last novel Nineteen Eighty-Four?. The usual explanation for the choice of title of Nineteen Eighty-Four is that it was a play on the last two digits of 1948, the year the manuscript was finished.. This has never convinced me. I think there may be a better explanation, which comes from George Orwell’s intellectual hostility to the Catholic writer G. K. Chesterton. THE CONTEXTS OF THATCHER’S BRUGES SPEECH OF 1988 1988 was four years before 1992, and at the time the latter seemed a more significant date for Europe. “1992” was the shorthand for a campaign of awareness of the completion (or supposed completion) of the Single Market. In April 1988, five months before the Bruges speech, Thatcher launched the “1992” campaign at Lancaster House.“EXCLUSIVE”
In researching around the Ministry of Justice’s Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Saudis, I came across a curious piece of information. (ADD, 3rd October 2015: A “Memorandum of Understanding” is a formal agreement, but usually one that is not intended to be contractual binding.) THE SEVEN HURDLES FOR REPEAL OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT The new Conservative government wants to repeal the Human Right Act 1998 (the “Act”) and replace with a “British Bill of Rights”. The intention appears to be to do this in “one hundred days”. LEEDS CROWN COURT: R V SARAH CATT Mr Justice Cooke’s sentencing remarks from this morning at Leeds Crown Court: Sentencing remarks: SARAH LOUISE CATT. 1. You have pleaded guilty to administering Misoprostol to yourself with intent to procure your own miscarriage. You are entitled to credit for that plea and generously, I give you the full 1/3 credit although you maintained “IN SOME POSSIBLE BRANCHES OF THE FUTURE LEAVING WILL BE Yesterday evening, I had a tweet exchange with Dominic Cummings, the architect of the (official) Leave campaign. His candour and opennesswas striking.
JACK OF KENT
British politics is currently exciting, with resignations and the prospects of leadership challenges. But when the excitement passes, there are certain brute facts about Brexit and the draft withdrawal agreement which will still be there. ABOUT DAVID ALLEN GREEN He is also able to speak, lecture, and train on legal and media subjects – from seminars and conferences to pub talks and after-dinner speeches. David is currently writing a ‘popular law’ book on privacy. Email: jackofkent@gmail.com. Twitter:@davidallengreen.
NIGHTJACK – RESOURCE PAGE – JACK OF KENT NightJack – resource page. This is the resource page for anyone following the NightJack story. This resource page will be updated from time to time. Comments and suggestions welcome. My narrative of what happened is now at the New Statesman. The original NightJack blog (February 2008 to April 2009) was pulled down when the Timesthreatened to
HORTON’S CLAIM AGAINST THE TIMES Horton’s claim against the Times. On 11 April 2012, a claim form was issued in the Chancery Division of the High Court by Richard Horton against Times Newspapers Limited. (Guardian story here .) I understand Horton was forced to issue a claim form as the Times did not bother to respond to his formal letter of claim. WHY DID GEORGE ORWELL CALL HIS LAST NOVEL NINETEEN EIGHTY Why did George Orwell call his last novel Nineteen Eighty-Four?. The usual explanation for the choice of title of Nineteen Eighty-Four is that it was a play on the last two digits of 1948, the year the manuscript was finished.. This has never convinced me. I think there may be a better explanation, which comes from George Orwell’s intellectual hostility to the Catholic writer G. K. Chesterton. THE CONTEXTS OF THATCHER’S BRUGES SPEECH OF 1988 1988 was four years before 1992, and at the time the latter seemed a more significant date for Europe. “1992” was the shorthand for a campaign of awareness of the completion (or supposed completion) of the Single Market. In April 1988, five months before the Bruges speech, Thatcher launched the “1992” campaign at Lancaster House.“EXCLUSIVE”
In researching around the Ministry of Justice’s Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Saudis, I came across a curious piece of information. (ADD, 3rd October 2015: A “Memorandum of Understanding” is a formal agreement, but usually one that is not intended to be contractual binding.) THE SEVEN HURDLES FOR REPEAL OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT The new Conservative government wants to repeal the Human Right Act 1998 (the “Act”) and replace with a “British Bill of Rights”. The intention appears to be to do this in “one hundred days”. LEEDS CROWN COURT: R V SARAH CATT Mr Justice Cooke’s sentencing remarks from this morning at Leeds Crown Court: Sentencing remarks: SARAH LOUISE CATT. 1. You have pleaded guilty to administering Misoprostol to yourself with intent to procure your own miscarriage. You are entitled to credit for that plea and generously, I give you the full 1/3 credit although you maintained “IN SOME POSSIBLE BRANCHES OF THE FUTURE LEAVING WILL BE Yesterday evening, I had a tweet exchange with Dominic Cummings, the architect of the (official) Leave campaign. His candour and opennesswas striking.
RESOURCES – JACK OF KENT Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * HORTON’S CLAIM AGAINST THE TIMES Horton’s claim against the Times. On 11 April 2012, a claim form was issued in the Chancery Division of the High Court by Richard Horton against Times Newspapers Limited. (Guardian story here .) I understand Horton was forced to issue a claim form as the Times did not bother to respond to his formal letter of claim.NEW WEBSITE!
I have finally got my own website! My intention is to use this new website for blogging as well as for creating detailed resource pages on issues I write about (including BCA v Simon Singh, TwitterJokeTrial, NightJack, Johann Hari, phone and computer hacking, libel and privacy law, and so on).DANIEL MORGAN
Daniel Morgan was murdered in 1987. Five successive police investigations failed to result in any successful prosecution. There is wide concern that the investigations were compromised by police corruption. There is also an allegation that the News of the World (a client of one of the suspects) was involved at one point in thesurveillance of
THE PROPOSAL FOR CPS GUIDANCE The Proposal for CPS Guidance. August 23, 2019. September 20, 2012 by Daniel Allen Green. The CPS today announced that there will be a consultation exercise on new social media guidance . I will be blogging on this tomorrow at the New Statesman. But in the meantime, please do share your views on these paragraphs: WHAT IS A “TURNIP-GHOST”? A POST FOR HALLOWE’EN A turnip-ghost is (or was) an English form of the “Jack-o-Lantern”. “ the hollowed rind of a turnip employed as a lantern; also as a term of abuse”. And it certainly was a term of abuse. Back in the days when all popular authors seemed to use initials, the turnip-ghost was a frequently used image.FEBRUARY 2012
February 29, 2012 by Daniel Allen Green. I have recently become interested in the case of Daniel Morgan, who was killed in March 1987. Morgan worked as a private investigator. His business partner was Jonathan Rees, who later became one of the main private investigators used by Fleet Street. ONE OF THE BEST BLOGGERS IN BRITAIN” Welcome to Jack of Kent, the personal website of liberal journalist and lawyer David Allen Green. You can read the Jack of Kent blog here.My old site is still over at HUMAN RIGHTS ACT AND BINGHAM’S QUESTION: WHICH RIGHTS ARE Freedom of expression.Freedom of assembly and association.The right to marry.The right not to be discriminated against in the enjoyment of those rights.The right not to have our property taken away except in the public interest and with compensation.The right of fair access to the country’s educational system.The right to free elections.JACK OF KENT
British politics is currently exciting, with resignations and the prospects of leadership challenges. But when the excitement passes, there are certain brute facts about Brexit and the draft withdrawal agreement which will still be there.JACK OF KENT
British politics is currently exciting, with resignations and the prospects of leadership challenges. But when the excitement passes, there are certain brute facts about Brexit and the draft withdrawal agreement which will still be there. ABOUT DAVID ALLEN GREEN He is also able to speak, lecture, and train on legal and media subjects – from seminars and conferences to pub talks and after-dinner speeches. David is currently writing a ‘popular law’ book on privacy. Email: jackofkent@gmail.com. Twitter:@davidallengreen.
RESOURCES – JACK OF KENT Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * WHY DID GEORGE ORWELL CALL HIS LAST NOVEL NINETEEN EIGHTY Why did George Orwell call his last novel Nineteen Eighty-Four?. The usual explanation for the choice of title of Nineteen Eighty-Four is that it was a play on the last two digits of 1948, the year the manuscript was finished.. This has never convinced me. I think there may be a better explanation, which comes from George Orwell’s intellectual hostility to the Catholic writer G. K. Chesterton. THE CONTEXTS OF THATCHER’S BRUGES SPEECH OF 1988 1988 was four years before 1992, and at the time the latter seemed a more significant date for Europe. “1992” was the shorthand for a campaign of awareness of the completion (or supposed completion) of the Single Market. In April 1988, five months before the Bruges speech, Thatcher launched the “1992” campaign at Lancaster House. JULY 2012 – JACK OF KENT Jesus and the Dinosaurs, and the gullibility of secularists. August 16, 2019. July 2, 2012 by Daniel Allen Green. Yesterday someone posted this picture at the Global Secular Humanist Movement’s Facebook page. The person who added the picture commented “The book is called “Jesus and Dinosaurs” you can order it from Answers in Genesis.FEBRUARY 2012
February 29, 2012 by Daniel Allen Green. I have recently become interested in the case of Daniel Morgan, who was killed in March 1987. Morgan worked as a private investigator. His business partner was Jonathan Rees, who later became one of the main private investigators used by Fleet Street.“EXCLUSIVE”
In researching around the Ministry of Justice’s Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Saudis, I came across a curious piece of information. (ADD, 3rd October 2015: A “Memorandum of Understanding” is a formal agreement, but usually one that is not intended to be contractual binding.) THE SEVEN HURDLES FOR REPEAL OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT The new Conservative government wants to repeal the Human Right Act 1998 (the “Act”) and replace with a “British Bill of Rights”. The intention appears to be to do this in “one hundred days”. “IN SOME POSSIBLE BRANCHES OF THE FUTURE LEAVING WILL BE Yesterday evening, I had a tweet exchange with Dominic Cummings, the architect of the (official) Leave campaign. His candour and opennesswas striking.
JACK OF KENT
British politics is currently exciting, with resignations and the prospects of leadership challenges. But when the excitement passes, there are certain brute facts about Brexit and the draft withdrawal agreement which will still be there. ABOUT DAVID ALLEN GREEN He is also able to speak, lecture, and train on legal and media subjects – from seminars and conferences to pub talks and after-dinner speeches. David is currently writing a ‘popular law’ book on privacy. Email: jackofkent@gmail.com. Twitter:@davidallengreen.
RESOURCES – JACK OF KENT Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * WHY DID GEORGE ORWELL CALL HIS LAST NOVEL NINETEEN EIGHTY Why did George Orwell call his last novel Nineteen Eighty-Four?. The usual explanation for the choice of title of Nineteen Eighty-Four is that it was a play on the last two digits of 1948, the year the manuscript was finished.. This has never convinced me. I think there may be a better explanation, which comes from George Orwell’s intellectual hostility to the Catholic writer G. K. Chesterton. THE CONTEXTS OF THATCHER’S BRUGES SPEECH OF 1988 1988 was four years before 1992, and at the time the latter seemed a more significant date for Europe. “1992” was the shorthand for a campaign of awareness of the completion (or supposed completion) of the Single Market. In April 1988, five months before the Bruges speech, Thatcher launched the “1992” campaign at Lancaster House. JULY 2012 – JACK OF KENT Jesus and the Dinosaurs, and the gullibility of secularists. August 16, 2019. July 2, 2012 by Daniel Allen Green. Yesterday someone posted this picture at the Global Secular Humanist Movement’s Facebook page. The person who added the picture commented “The book is called “Jesus and Dinosaurs” you can order it from Answers in Genesis.FEBRUARY 2012
February 29, 2012 by Daniel Allen Green. I have recently become interested in the case of Daniel Morgan, who was killed in March 1987. Morgan worked as a private investigator. His business partner was Jonathan Rees, who later became one of the main private investigators used by Fleet Street.“EXCLUSIVE”
In researching around the Ministry of Justice’s Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Saudis, I came across a curious piece of information. (ADD, 3rd October 2015: A “Memorandum of Understanding” is a formal agreement, but usually one that is not intended to be contractual binding.) THE SEVEN HURDLES FOR REPEAL OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT The new Conservative government wants to repeal the Human Right Act 1998 (the “Act”) and replace with a “British Bill of Rights”. The intention appears to be to do this in “one hundred days”. “IN SOME POSSIBLE BRANCHES OF THE FUTURE LEAVING WILL BE Yesterday evening, I had a tweet exchange with Dominic Cummings, the architect of the (official) Leave campaign. His candour and opennesswas striking.
HORTON’S CLAIM AGAINST THE TIMES Horton’s claim against the Times. On 11 April 2012, a claim form was issued in the Chancery Division of the High Court by Richard Horton against Times Newspapers Limited. (Guardian story here .) I understand Horton was forced to issue a claim form as the Times did not bother to respond to his formal letter of claim. NIGHTJACK – RESOURCE PAGE – JACK OF KENT NightJack – resource page. This is the resource page for anyone following the NightJack story. This resource page will be updated from time to time. Comments and suggestions welcome. My narrative of what happened is now at the New Statesman. The original NightJack blog (February 2008 to April 2009) was pulled down when the Timesthreatened to
DANIEL MORGAN
Background. Daniel Morgan was murdered in 1987. Five successive police investigations failed to result in any successful prosecution. There is wide concern that the investigations were compromised by policecorruption.
NEW WEBSITE!
I have finally got my own website! My intention is to use this new website for blogging as well as for creating detailed resource pages on issues I write about (including BCA v Simon Singh, TwitterJokeTrial, NightJack, Johann Hari, phone and computer hacking, libel and privacy law, and so on). FIVE ARGUMENTS AGAINST A #PEOPLESVOTE On Saturday 20th October there was a march in favour of the “People’s Vote” – for a further referendum in respect of Brexit before the UK departs the EU.FEBRUARY 2012
February 29, 2012 by Daniel Allen Green. I have recently become interested in the case of Daniel Morgan, who was killed in March 1987. Morgan worked as a private investigator. His business partner was Jonathan Rees, who later became one of the main private investigators used by Fleet Street. JULY 2013 – JACK OF KENT According to news reports, it was a breach of confidence by a lawyer which led to JK Rowling being identified as the real author of a thriller by “Robert Galbraith”.She is also reported to not be happy about this. Assuming those reports are correct (and I will not mention the law firm or the lawyer in case they reports are not correct) then it raises an interesting legal question.FEBRUARY 2013
R-v-VASILIKI PRYCE. JURY QUESTIONS. QUESTION 1. You have defined the defence of marital coercion at page 5 and also explained what does not fall within the definition by way of examples. MAY 2013 – JACK OF KENT Earlier today, my friend Sally Bercow lost at the High Court on whether her tweet mentioning Lord McAlpine was defamatory or not. (Judgment here.). She has now released a statement through the PressAssociation:
JACK OF KENT
British politics is currently exciting, with resignations and the prospects of leadership challenges. But when the excitement passes, there are certain brute facts about Brexit and the draft withdrawal agreement which will still be there.Skip to content
JACK OF KENT
The website of David Allen GreenMenu
* Home
* Blog
* About David Allen Green* Resources
* Libel Reform Resources for Defamation Bill 2012* NightJack
“…ONE OF THE BEST BLOGGERS IN BRITAIN” — NICK COHEN August 24, 2019December 24, 2018 by Daniel Allen Green Welcome to Jack of Kent, the personal website of liberal journalist and lawyer David Allen Green. You can read the Jack of Kent blog here . My old site is still over at http://jackofkent.blogspot.com/.
I write regularly for the _New Statesman_ and _The
Lawyer
_websites, and
you can also follow me on Twitterand Facebook
.
I can be contacted at_ jackofkent@gmail.com_. Categories UncategorizedLeave a comment
THREE VISIBLE PATHS OUT OF THE CURRENT BREXIT FOG August 23, 2019November 26, 2018 by Daniel Allen Green So where are we now on Brexit?We are in a fog.
We are in a situation the outcome of which nobody can predict, at least with any certainty. There is no pundit, no official, no politician who knows what willhappen with Brexit.
In this fog, however, there are paths which are currently more visiblethan any others.
*
First, the UK will leave the EU by automatic operation of law on 29 March 2019 – that is, unless something happens to prevent it. In domestic legislation, the European Communities Act 1972 is also set to be repealed on 29 March 2019. So this is the default predicament – the quickest way to the bottomof the slope.
Nothing more need to be done for these two legal events to happen, and for these events not to happen will take substantial effort. This will be the path of least resistance, even if it would be a disaster in practice. But it is not the only path.*
The second visible path in the fog is accepting the deal. The deal has been negotiated by both sides, and there is a single agreed text for both sides to now endorse and ratify. The EU has already endorsed it senior level though the European Parliament has yet to approve it or veto it. Signing this agreement would, for the UK, to be path of next-to-leastresistance.
The problem here is that it seems that there are not enough MPs toapprove it.
If there is not not enough support in the Commons, the UK can either drop back down to the path of least resistance (a no deal Brexit as above) or somehow do something else.*
If the EU is sincere when it says it does not want to re-open negotiations, then the current deal will be the only deal on offer, regardless of whether UK seeks extra time for a referendum orotherwise.
In other words, the choices above will not change. (I cannot see any political appetite on either side for my preferred option of abandoning the Article 50 process, and for the UK and EU to negotiate the withdrawal and relationship agreement together as a single treaty, for as long as it takes.) And so the only other option would presumably for Brexit to be abandoned altogether. Only “remain” remains once the other options are discounted. That is the only other visible path, but it will be quite aclimb(down).
*
A number of good and sensible people can see other things in this fog, paths leading elsewhere. I hope they are right, and I hope they will forgive me for not being able to see these other paths out of the thecurrent mess.
But a genuine worry must be that the UK government continues to take the path of least resistance and falls into a no deal scenario.**
_For email alerts for my posts at Jack of Kent – including for Brexit updates – please submit your email address in the “Subscribe” box on this page._***
COMMENTS ARE PRE-MODERATED AND WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED UNLESS THEY ARE POLITE OR INTERESTING/INFORMATIVE (AND PREFERABLY BOTH). Categories UncategorizedLeave a comment
WHY THE DRAFT WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT MAY BE THE ONLY RESPONSIBLE OPTION August 23, 2019November 16, 2018 by Daniel Allen Green British politics is currently exciting, with resignations and the prospects of leadership challenges. But when the excitement passes, there are certain brute facts about Brexit and the draft withdrawal agreement which will still be there.*
First, there will still be the mandate of the referendum result. One may contest that there was a real mandate and point to the irregularities and the unlawful behaviour of certain campaigners. That, however, does not change the political reality that the government, the opposition and the majority of MPs are committed to fulfilling that mandate.*
Second, the UK is set to leave the EU by automatic operation of law on29 March 2019.
On the same day, the European Communities Act 1972 is also set to be repealed by automatic operation of law. Both of these legal facts can be averted, of course, by formal action in the 130 or so days left. But until and unless that happens, theyare the defaults.
*
Third, the UK is unprepared for a “No Deal” Brexit, and there is no serious prospect that the UK can become prepared properly in the time available before 29 March 2019. This is true, regardless of those who in abstract terms seem to be at ease with the prospect. The reality would be chaos in respect of customs and citizenship, supply chains of food and other necessities, atomic energy and medicine, and so on. A No Deal Brexit is not serious politics.*
And fourth, there is little prospect of the EU27 budging on its offered terms of departure. Those politicians such as Michael Gove and on the Labour front bench who are raising hopes for a “re-negotiation” need to answer twosimple questions.
1. What concrete, specific terms in the draft withdrawal agreement do they want to re-negotiate? 2. And why do they think EU27 will shift their position? The EU has arrived at its position after two years of guidelines and consultation, and their position will not change lightly – orquickly.
*
In the cold light of mid-December, when the parliamentary vote is expected to take place, the attitude of MPs may well be different fromnow.
Yesterday it seemed that the Prime Minister did not have a majority for the draft withdrawal agreement. In a few weeks, it may be that MPs have to choose between the deal still in the table or risk catastrophe in spring. Of course, there is the possibility that the UK government suddenly changes gear and will seek an extension of time for a further referendum, as a way out of a political deadlock. Or the opposition Labour party may succeed in forcing a generalelection.
Nothing can be ruled out given the current state of British politics.*
The public release of the draft withdrawal agreement was not donewell.
A 585-page complex legal instrument was just dumped onto the internet by the UK government. There was no accompanying executive summary. There was not even a table of contents. The back half of the document, comprising the various protocols, were confusingly arranged even to legalprofessionals.
None of the politicians or pundits who quickly formed opinions on the draft could have read and properly digested the draft. Those ministers who prepared resignation letters within hours certainly could not have properly considered the document. Whatever positions were adopted, they were not based directly on theinstrument itself.
*
The draft withdrawal agreement is not, in fact, a bad document from the UK’s perspective. The EU, for example, has given way on issues in respect of the role of the European Court of Justice. Even the notorious backstop, which provides what will happen if the UK and EU fail to agree a relationship agreement, is heavily caveated and subject to various protections. If MPs do vote against, and the EU does not renegotiate then, other things being equal, the best the UK can hope for are a series of emergency bilateral agreements before March on discrete cross-border issues to mitigate against the worst of the impact of No Deal. That would be unseemly, and there is no guarantee the agreements would work, but that would be to what a responsible, desperate government would have to resort. Whatever happens in the next few hours, days and weeks, the EU’s offer is likely to still be there. Of course, if there is a development which means the UK seeks an extension of the Article 50 period, or even revokes the notification, then the ultimatum of this text or No Deal becomes far less urgent. But if that does not happen, the UK will have no real option to accept, however embarrassing it will be for the MPs who attacked thedeal yesterday.
In this way, Brexit will become like Grexit.**
_For email alerts for my posts at Jack of Kent – including for Brexit updates – please submit your email address in the “Subscribe” box on this page._***
COMMENTS ARE PRE-MODERATED AND WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED UNLESS THEY ARE POLITE OR INTERESTING/INFORMATIVE (AND PREFERABLY BOTH). Categories UncategorizedLeave a comment
Post navigation
Older posts
Page1 Page2 … Page48Next →
Search for:
RECENT POSTS
* “…one of the best bloggers in Britain” — Nick Cohen * Three visible paths out of the current Brexit fog * Why the draft withdrawal agreement may be the only responsibleoption
* Five arguments against a #PeoplesVote * Theresa May and John ConstantineARCHIVES
* December 2018
* November 2018
* October 2018
* September 2018
* July 2018
* April 2018
* December 2017
* November 2017
* September 2017
* August 2017
* July 2017
* June 2017
* May 2017
* April 2017
* March 2017
* February 2017
* November 2016
* October 2016
* September 2016
* August 2016
* July 2016
* June 2016
* May 2016
* April 2016
* March 2016
* February 2016
* January 2016
* November 2015
* October 2015
* September 2015
* August 2015
* July 2015
* June 2015
* May 2015
* April 2015
* March 2015
* February 2015
* January 2015
* October 2014
* July 2014
* June 2014
* May 2014
* August 2013
* July 2013
* June 2013
* May 2013
* April 2013
* March 2013
* February 2013
* January 2013
* December 2012
* November 2012
* October 2012
* September 2012
* August 2012
* July 2012
* June 2012
* May 2012
* April 2012
* March 2012
* February 2012
2021 Jack of Kent • Built with GeneratePressDetails
Copyright © 2024 ArchiveBay.com. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | DMCA | 2021 | Feedback | Advertising | RSS 2.0