Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
More Annotations
A complete backup of mercurymagazines.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of club-vulcan-777.ru
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of xoopstotal.com.br
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of discoverytoys.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of melodyehsani.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of cbdbulkoilreview.org
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Favourite Annotations
A complete backup of ferienhausecomersee.de
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of groups.google.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of historischekringdriel.nl
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of persianfootball.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of cratosadvisors.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of steinhuder-meer.de
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of heavybubbles.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Text
Menu
Close
* Home
* Archive
* Ask away
* Subtim
__
BROWNBEAR
ENJOY THE ART AND SEX BOTH ARE FREE sweatybananamilkshakemaker:
>
breakfast
(via pvssyfuck )
-------------------------__
Oct 30, 2019
largoandeditt
:
> _“Largo and Editt are waking up”_>
> Video by @largoandeditt>
> Take a look at our TUMBLR or>
> for more gifs like this of ourselves <3(via largoandeditt
)
-------------------------__
Oct 29, 2019
70sscifiart
:
> Richard Powers - ‘Wolfbane’ -------------------------__
Oct 29, 2019
crystalline-aesthetics:
> Jan Toorop
>
> _ The Three Brides (De Drie Bruiden)_. details, 1891-92, chalk, > pencils and charcoal on brownish paper, 78 x 98 > cm. Kröller-Müller Museum, The Netherlands(via xesmgkk
)
-------------------------__
Oct 29, 2019
nevver
:
> _The Weeping Woman,_ Raúl Anguiano>
-------------------------__
Oct 29, 2019
nevver
:
> Running aground, Matt Warren>
-------------------------__
Oct 29, 2019
captvinvanity
:
> HIGH-RISE GIANTS | PHOTOGRAPHER>
> |
> CV
(via motivationsforlife)
-------------------------__
Oct 29, 2019
knock-me-up
:
> Yes please
(Source: havens )
-------------------------__
Oct 29, 2019
humanpersonface
:
> atopfourthwall
> :
>
>> pyrrhiccomedy
>> :
>>
>>> shaaknaa
>>> :
>>>
>>>> pococurantina>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> achromic-red-dreams-doze-angrily>>>>> :
>>>>>
>>>>>> achromic-red-dreams-doze-angrily>>>>>> :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> inkwingart >>>>>>> :>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> x4w >>>>>>>> :>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> rb this with ur opinion on this shade of pink:>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is magenta, and not pink. Unlike pink, magenta >>>>>>>> doesn’t actually exist. Our brain just invents >>>>>>>> magenta to serve as what it considers a logical bridge >>>>>>>> between red and violet, which each exist at opposite >>>>>>>> ends of a linear spectrum.>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> TL;DR this color is fake (and also I hate it)>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> w>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> what>>>>>>
>>>>>> im>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Wait til you learn about Stygean Blue>>>
>>> Your brain is a badly-designed hot mess of bootstrapped >>> chemistry that will tell you that all kinds of shit is happening >>> that has no correlation to physical reality, including time>>> travel
>>> .
>>> It just makes things up. Your brain is guessing about what’s >>> happening when your eyes saccade, what’s happening in your >>> blind spot, and what the majority of the visible light spectrum >>> looks like, and you don’t know it’s happening because it >>> doesn’t aid your survival to become aware that a lot of what >>> you see is fake.>>>
>>> The human eye only has three types of color sensitive cones, >>> which detect red, blue, and green light. Your brain is making up >>> every other color you perceive.>>>
>>> Let’s have a little fun with that thought. This is the visible >>> spectrum of light.>>>
>>> You will of course note that yellow is on the chart. Yellow has >>> a discreet wavelength, and is therefore a distinct physical >>> color. But _we can’t see it_.>>>
>>> “Sorry, what the fuck?”>>>
>>> What we call yellow is just what our brain shrugs and spits out >>> when our red and green cones are equally stimulated. We have >>> _light_ receptors that can pick up on the physical spectrum of >>> light we call yellow: that’s why yellow things don’t just >>> look like moving black blocks to us. But your brain has no >>> fucking idea what the _color_ yellow looks like.>>>
>>> Some animals have eyes that _can_ perceive the color yellow! >>> Goldfish have a yellow cone in their eyes. If they could talk, >>> they could tell us what yellow looks like. But we wouldn’t be >>> able to understand it.>>>
>>> What your brain actually sees of the color spectrum:>>>
>>>
>>> We can measure the wavelength of light, so we know that when we >>> see ‘yellow,’ we are seeing light in that 550-ish >>> nanometers range. But we don’t have a cone in our eyes that >>> can pick that up. Your brain just has a very consistent guess >>> about what color that wavelength of light could be. We decided >>> to name that guess ‘yellow.’ We can’t imagine what yellow >>> really looks like any more than a dog can imagine the color red.>>>
>>> Here’s the funny thing: your brain is never perceiving just >>> one photon of light at a time. Something like 2*10⁸ photons >>> per second>>> are
>>> hitting your retina under normal conditions. Your brain >>> doesn’t individually process all of them. So it averages them >>> out. It grabs a bunch of photons all coming from the same >>> direction, with the same pattern, and goes, “yeah, that cup >>> is blue, fuck it, next.”>>>
>>> That’s how colors blend in our eyes. So sure, if a photon of >>> light with a wavelength of 550 nanometers bounces into our eyes, >>> we see what we call “yellow.” But if we see two photons at >>> the same time, coming from the same object, one of which is 500 >>> nms and the other of which is 600 nms, your brain will average >>> them out and you will _still see yellow even though none of the >>> light you just saw was 550 nms._>>>
>>> So how does magenta factor into this?>>>
>>> Well, as we’ve just established, when your brain sees light >>> from two different slices of the visible light spectrum, it will >>> try to just average them together. Green plus red is yellow, >>> fuck it. If it’s more red than green, we’ll call >>> that ‘orange.’ Literally who gives a shit, we’re trying >>> to forage over here. There are bears out here and it’s so>>> scary.
>>>
>>> What happens if you take the average of blue and red light, >>> which we perceive to be magenta? What’s the centerpoint of >>> that line?>>>
>>> Fucking _green_.>>>
>>> Hey, that’s not gonna _work?_ We live on a planet where >>> EVERYTHING IS GREEN. If something is NOT green, that means >>> it’s either food, or a potential source of danger, and either >>> way your brain wants you to know about it.>>>
>>> So your brain goes, WHOOPS. Okay - this is fine. We already made >>> up yellow, orange, cyan, and violet. We’ll just make up >>> another color. Something that looks really, really different >>> from green.>>>
>>> And so it made up magenta.>>>
>>> So, physics-wise, is magenta “real?”>>>
>>> No; there’s no single wavelength of light that corresponds to >>> magenta. But you’re rarely seeing only a single wavelength of >>> light anyway. And even when you are, every color other than RGB >>> is a dart thrown on the wall by your meat computer. This is the >>> CIE Chromaticity Diagram>>> :
>>>
>>> Explaining this thing is a little more than I want to take on on >>> a Saturday morning, but I’ve included a link above that goes >>> into it a little more. The point is that only the colors that >>> actually touch the ‘outline’ of the shape actually >>> correspond to a specific wavelength of light. All of the other >>> colors are blends of multiple wavelengths. So magenta isn’t>>> special.
>>>
>>> Given that color is just a fun trick your brain is playing on >>> you to help you find food and avoid danger, is magenta real?>>>
>>> Yeah, absolutely. Or at least, it’s just as real as most of >>> what we see. It’s what we see when we mix up blue and red. It >>> would be disastrous from a survival standpoint to perceive that >>> color as green, so we don’t. Because it’s not green. Light >>> that’s green has a wavelength of around 510 nm. Stuff that’s >>> magenta bounces back light that is both ~400 and ~700. Your >>> brain knows the difference. So it fills in the gap for you, with >>> the best guess it has, same as it does with your blind spot.>>>
>>> The perception of color exists within your brain, and your brain >>> says you see magenta. So you see magenta.>>
>
> So I googled Stygian Blue and…>
> Yall.
>
>
> FORBIDDEN.
this is amazing
(Source: scpeve
,
via isabelaescobart
)
-------------------------__
Oct 29, 2019
electrictattoos
:
> Stu Pagdin
-------------------------__
Oct 29, 2019
catonhottinroof
:
> Filippo Carcano (1840-1914)>
> _Nata dal mare,_ 1911(via xesmgkk
)
-------------------------__
Oct 29, 2019
preetinhoo :
>
(via kidl3jin )
-------------------------__
Oct 29, 2019
(Source: bambipunks ,via kidl3jin )
-------------------------__
Oct 29, 2019
(Source: lzdescloux ,via kidl3jin )
-------------------------__
Oct 29, 2019
kidl3jin
:
> he looks like a happy camper>
> lousehard :
>
>>
-------------------------__
Oct 29, 2019
Indy Theme by Safe As MilkDetails
Copyright © 2024 ArchiveBay.com. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | DMCA | 2021 | Feedback | Advertising | RSS 2.0