* Contact Clint

* The Corporation Nation * The Corporation Nation Radio Show And Red Pill Sunday School Show

* Who Am I?

* World Without Gray Radio Show

REALITY BLOG

A DECONSTRUCTION OF THE DEATH OF CHRIST: IT’S NOT WHAT YOU THINK

–=–

“But the natural (idiot/foolish) man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know , because they are spiritually

discerned.”

_–1 Corinthians 2:14

_

–=–

As a consummate Bible researcher nowadays, I am always looking for spiritual, reasonable explanations for the most unreasonable, ridiculous sounding of stories. There is, of course, a fine line between deciphering the absurd to find spiritual instruction and playing the fool. The king’s scribes were quite clever in their transliterations, leaving traps and pitfalls throughout the Crown’s copyrighted, English (dog-Latin) version. Some may take offense at the idea that I am calling the story of Christ’s death and resurrection as a somewhat ridiculous story, and to you otherwise reasonable people, I will simply offer to tell you why I say this over a glass of blood-turned wine along with Jonah inside the “whale’s” (translation _sea monster’s_) mouth aside a nice burning bush. The ancient, well known, often utilized, and certainly well established Truth is that the more ridiculous an allegory or other moral story is portrayed, the more easily it is remembered. If you’ve ever bought one of those memory courses from a television infomercial as I did when I was a very young lad, you’ll find the same exact lesson on how ridiculousness supercharges the memory, complete with instructions on how to imagine the utmost ridiculous connections to different images in your head in order to remember a list of 100, or even 1,000 words. The stranger the image or description and correlation of those words in order, the more memorable that list becomes. Indeed, in trying to memorize cold a list of irrelevant words, I could not, my mind able to recite merely a few, out of order, and without coherent purpose. But when I applied the rules of ridiculousness, that is, when I followed the instructions and correlated the words as a continuous, absolutely absurd set of details in a story of my own imagination,  I was amazingly able to remember lists of 100 or more words, in order, by simply connecting each word as instructed. For example, if the first word is _elephant_ and the second word is _umbrella_, I was instructed to imagine the most silly looking of elephants, complete with concerned expression and a polka-dotted leotard, that is holding an umbrella. And if the third word was then _turtle_, then I would imagine the elephant in the ridiculous leotard holding the umbrella up against falling turtles, themselves having something odd about them. If the forth word was water, then I would imagine the turtles doing an awesome 360 flip and while diving into the ocean, or if it were sunglasses, then of course the turtles would be sporting some shades. And so it went, word after totally unrelated word, placed by my mind into the most ridiculous of loosely linked, situational absurdities. And sure enough, as I pictured these things in my mind, I was able to spout off that list of words with hardly any effort at all, because who could resist that silly elephant holding an umbrella so as not to get hit by the falling turtles that were diving into the ocean with sunglasses, etc. etc. When I consider all the True life stories I’ve heard over the years, as I am sure the reader would agree, again I find that I remember the most outlandish, ridiculous, or even most violent ones most often. I find myself telling stories about these events, and usually I do so because of their ridiculousness, their humor, or their horror. Comedians make whole stand-up routines based on such ridiculous stories, turning them into jokes that may or may not be true… but they sure are memorable. And of course we remember certain jokes because they are funny, and they are funny because they are absurd or even impossible in Nature. Perhaps they are embarrassing, or they remind us of something close to home or a personal experience. Whatever the case, we are wired to remember the most bizarre shit. We remember the harshness of violence, experiencing post traumatic stress, as another example. If I were to ask anyone where they were on 9/11/2001, they could probably tell me in detail, simply because what they really remember is a link between the out-of-place absurdity of watching the World Trade Centers burning and falling on television, because such an absurdity was in the background on every television screen, everywhere, making whatever one was doing that day stand out. In fact, when prompted to speak about that horrific event, many of us specifically reference whatever mundane task we were preforming and whatever usual place we were lingering. But if I were to ask anyone where they were three days before their 27th birthday, they most likely would have no clue. Why? No association. No correlation. No event to remember. No story to tell. Whatever stands out about the event, the story, the happenstance, and specifically the ridiculousness of the situation, the more memorable it is. It’s like a filter in the mind, where the details of what is considered as normal or routine are lost in the shuffle, but where learnable or unique moments shine through, teaching and preparing us for the future. After all, there’s a psychological reason why shock-jocks are so unwittingly popular and why news outlets have “breaking news” and cover certain stories for weeks at a time, 24 hours a day. Entertainments are the same way. The more scary, the more ridiculous, the more fantastical, the more memorable they are. For how can one explain what does not exist, say in science fiction or fantasy, without a deep impression of that non-existent thing to the point of being able to picture it in ones mind? Yet most of us (I hope) can still distinguish between reality and fantasy. In other words, after seeing a fictional movie, we do not believe in those false, computer-enhanced images as what is actually real or as history. That would be Idolatry. And, I’m sorry and happy to say, religions are no exception to this rule. Why are all the stories of the gods of all the cultures so ridiculous? Why are the gods tyrannical, manipulative monsters with multiple heads or some other superpower or supernatural attribute? From Zeus to the Babylonian creation story, these tales are physically, scientifically, and logically impossible to believe. Yet we remember them, don’t we? Many insist they are to be taken as literally True, as the Word of God, ironically and in idolatry assigning supernatural qualities to the God of Nature, while completely loosing the moral teaching intended through that ridiculousness. And I agree, they are the Word of God (Truth)… but only if you are taking them as the metaphor and moral story they are meant to be understood as. They are mythical because myth is memorable. All civilizations, all countries and nations, all religions, are built upon their own ridiculous myths about those that founded or formed them. Without the mythology of the founding fathers, there would be no purpose behind the United States, and certainly no reason to support what it has morphed into in modern times — a simulacra (a copy having nothing to do with its original) desperately promoting that patriot mythology as its reason for its post-modern existence. If Zeus was a librarian that had no authority, that shuffled books around all day without any other adventure or purpose, what could we possibly learn as his moral story? What would be memorable about his godliness? The problem is that, while we remember the story, we often don’t remember or were never taught the point behind the ridiculous, impossible-to-be-True story. We are never told the moral lesson of the allegory. And so we take it literally, which in our minds causes the story to become historical “fact” instead of learning from the story (pretended history). We mistake facts with Truths. For instance, it is a fact that Han Solo and Chewbacca are ship-mates. But did you know it’s a fact that they are also lifelong friends? These are facts, in fiction. But they are not Truths. They are not the Word of God. There are many facts used to tell the story of the Law, that is, of the Word of God. Yet the Word (moral Law) is often lost behind belief in the facts, which aren’t Truths, only tools to cause Truth to shine. And often those facts are ridiculous, causing memory association. But as the Bible quote above suggests, the fool may not discern spiritual Truths because the fool is too busy trying to prove or disprove the facts, trying to prove the history instead of learning from it. It is foolish to believe that the purpose of the stories (mythos) of any history is to establish fact. Only the elite do this, and only to prove their power positions over the common people. These historical facts are institutional lies that justify completely unjustifiable rulers, which would have no purpose or reason behind their otherwise totally illegitimate rule if it weren’t for the established, embellished, generally bullshit historical fact they force us to learn in their public schools and institutions. And the only reason we fall for these so-called histories is because we forget their purpose their reason, their intention. We take them as literal instead of make-believe. We allow the most ridiculous events, like 9-11, to be used as historical facts in their justification for completely immoral, illegitimate, tyrannical laws to be passed against us. And we consider those laws somehow as truths instead of the prima facie (on their face) facts they actually are. We consider what is totally avoidable as that which is unavoidable, simply because we are tricked by their supposed factual history of inventions instead of learning from them. We don’t emulate the founding fathers in their dissent from the king, we treat them as gods, as the reason why their great grandchildren continue to rule the illegitimate United States corporation, which didn’t even exist until after those founding fathers (gods) were dead. In other words, prima facie means that these legal terms and laws are all facts as long as nobody questions their legitimacy, which is the description of every government. Corrupt men that seek power all have this trait in common — they turn the moral lessons meant to be learned by the retelling of history into the evidence of why they should be rulers. They turn myth into fact, and force it to be labeled and considered by fools as Truth. Judging by the amount of narcissism taking place nowadays, I’d say the point of the story of Narcissus has been lost, for example. Perhaps they’ll name a cell phone camera model or selfie app after that unfortunate character of mythology? Or perhaps the story of the modern Narcissist must be rewritten to reflect the idiotic “accidents” taking place so often, as people walk off of cliffs while filming themselves doing so, even as they fall to their death on the craggy rocks below. Perhaps the myth of the Lemmings may need to be rewritten for these post-modern times, where those cute, cuddly creatures walk off the cliff with cell phones in their paws? We may watch and enjoy movies like Clash of the Titans or Lord of the Rings without coming away from the story with its actual purpose for being told — the moral lesson. Unfortunately, the story of Jesus Christ and his death and resurrection are no different. When taken literally, as a purely historical event, the point of christ’s death is completely lost. It serves no purpose. It becomes an excuse instead of a cause. The moral takeaway and lesson of the life and death of Christ today for most “Christians” is just about as dead as that

of the Greek gods.

In this study, I’d like to show you the exact place in the Bible where the spiritual, moral reason behind this story of Christ is explained. But first we have to understand what was the Babylonian, Mosaic tradition of animal and human sacrifice before the Christ (New Law) became the metaphoric, spiritual replacement for the literal

sacrificial lamb.

PASCHAL – _adjective_ – Pertaining to the passover, or to Easter. _(–Webster’s __Dictionary of the English

language, 1828)_

PASSOVER – _noun_ – A feast of the JEWS, INSTITUTED TO COMMEMORATE THE PROVIDENTIAL ESCAPE OF THE HEBREWS, IN EGYPT, WHEN GOD SMITING THE FIRST-BORN OF THE EGYPTIANS, PASSED OVER THE HOUSES OF THE ISRAELITES, WHICH WERE MARKED WITH THE BLOOD OF THE PASCHAL LAMB. 1. The SACRIFICE offered at the feast of the _passover. (–Webster’s __Dictionary of the English language,

1828)_

EASTER – _noun – _A FESTIVAL OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH OBSERVED IN COMMEMORATION OF OUR SAVIOR’S RESURRECTION. IT ANSWERS TO THE PASCHA OR PASSOVER OF THE HEBREWS, AND MOST NATIONS STILL GIVE IT THIS NAME, pascha, pask, paque. _(–Webster’s __Dictionary of the English

language, 1828)_

–=–

Think these are the same holidays? Have you been told that Easter and Passover are similar in their celebrative purpose? It’s a lie. Don’t believe it. The story of Easter is designed to replace the Babylonian (i.e. Jewish) story of Passover just as the New Testament is meant to replace the Old. In other words, the sacrifice of the “Son of God” is designed to replace the sacrifice of animals to the Babylonian gods. The New Testament is designed not to eliminate but to fulfill the Old.

–=–

“EVER SINCE THE NEW TESTAMENT, THE PASCHAL LAMB HAS BEEN INTERPRETED AS PREFIGURING JESUS. IN SUBSEQUENT CENTURIES, CHURCH FATHERS AND LATER CLERGY TAUGHT THAT JESUS WAS THE LAMB OF GOD, THE NEW PASSOVER SACRIFICE. THE CHRISTIAN WHO IS QUOTED OR PARAPHRASED IN _SEFER NITZTZAHON YASHAN_ MAKES THE CURIOUS ARGUMENT: THE DIFFICULTY OF OFFERING ANY RATIONAL REASON FOR THE DETAILS OF THE PASCHAL SACRIFICE IN EXODUS 12 “PROVES” THAT THE TEXT REQUIRES AN ALLEGORICAL EXPLANATION, AND IT MUST BE AN ALLEGORY ABOUT JESUS. THIS SEEMS TO HAVE LED JEWS TO WORK HARDER TO PROVE THAT, ON THE LITERAL LEVEL, THE RULES WERE MEANINGFUL, NOT ARBITRARY… MODERN BIBLICAL SCHOLARS ALSO STRUGGLE WITH THE MEANING OF THE RITUAL AND THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THESE DETAILS, TYPICALLY USING ANTHROPOLOGICAL TOOLS TO UNDERSTAND IT, AND SUGGESTING THAT MOST OF THESE RITUALS DID NOT ORIGINATE WITH A HISTORICAL FIRST PASSOVER… SUCH IS THE NATURE OF ALLEGORICAL EXPLANATIONS. CHRISTIANS CLAIMED THAT THE ALLEGORY WAS ABOUT JESUS, BUT THERE WAS NOTHING TO STOP ANOTHER ALLEGORIST FROM GIVING A TOTALLY DIFFERENT EXPLANATION, IN THIS CASE, THAT IT WAS ABOUT THE JEWISH PEOPLE AS A WHOLE.” _–Prof. Rabbi Martin Lockshin, excerpted from ‘Searching for the Meaning of the Passover Sacrifice, The need for medieval exegetes to suggest a plausible alternative to the Christian exegesis of this

ritual’_

–=–

The problem? Here we have an allegory trying desperately to be proven as a history. Happens all the time. Again, the fool completely misses the spiritual lesson, because to the fool, the spiritual lesson is foolishness, and the spiritual coldness and irrelevance of history and scientific proofs are paramount. Now, before you get all bent out of shape because of some pseudo-religious belief that the modern conceptualization of “science” as the new, replacement-for-Christ savior of men is the holy grail of the atheist (fool) and the logician, hold your horses just a moment and think about what I’m saying here. Because this question is a very reasonable one that can easily and even scientifically be answered: can science be applied to the Bible? In other words, can science discern the moral value and intent from an allegorical story or mythological history? Can science be used to prove or disprove an allegory, a metaphor, an aphorism, a moral equivalent, or a mythology? Of course it can’t. What a fool one must be to attempt to apply science to a book of moral stories and inherent Laws intended as that which is not even in the realm of scientific observation! Shall we use science to examine whether or not Little Miss Muffet truly sat on a Tuffet, searching desperately through historical ruins to prove said tuffet and the girl that sat on it actually existed? Shall we merely take at its word the story of Mary and her supposedly little lamb and that its fleece was apparently white as snow? Was Wilber really “Some Pig” as Charlotte the Black Widow claims him to be, or was he just another side of bacon waiting to happen? You must understand that this is not a pro- or anti- science argument, but rather just a case where science isn’t even part of the topic. It simply isn’t necessary or relevant to the purpose and intent of the Bible as a moral teaching tool to invoke scientific methods. Spirituality and moral behavior is not a scientific subject. And it’s utterly ridiculous to attempt to try and prove or disprove the Bible’s allegorical, metaphorical nature with the tools of science. Perhaps the fact that this idea is so ridiculous is why it has caught on with such fervor among non-thinking fools. Yet one must ask such a purveyor of scientific proofs for allegorical stories this question: which is more ridiculous and unscientific, the Bible stories themselves, or trying to prove or disprove those moral stories with science? LOL! Why would anyone attempt to bring science into a moral discussion? Unless, perhaps, one wishes to purposefully confuse the very intent and purpose of the Bible’s allegorical mythos and moral lessons with some “factual” or “scientifically provable” history (an oxymoron) that never actually happened so as to justify whatever it is they call themselves… kings, priests, popes, magistrates, judges, jews, Christians, or just good old false gods? The moral of this story is that morals cannot be proven by science. They are not of the same realm. That is to say that spiritual thought and action are not and cannot be scientifically justified. Inversely, there is no spirituality in science, for True science seeks only to understand Nature Itself, not decipher its spiritual meaning. Attempting to apply science to the Bible is like applying spiritual morals to a spiritless machine. It just doesn’t work. Yet, it certainly works to confuse and confound most people from understanding the Bible. In that way, science may very well, in the end, triumph over the minds of men and destroy our collective spirit. You see, If the bible can be made into an artificially “factual” history (fact) instead of an allegory (moral Truth) in the minds of Christians… oh, wait, that’s already happened. That’s the purpose of legal corporations that in their corporate charters call themselves by differing, anti-Biblical, empty, denominational religious names. And each one has a history of its own. The Methodists have their founding father, John Wesley. The Catholics have their replacement (anti) God and vicar of christ, the Pope. The 7th Day Adventists have their very recent history of Ellen White and John Nevins Andrews, their own founding fathers. The Baptists founding father in Amsterdam was John Smyth, with John Clark or Roger Williams in America. Mormons have their bizarre history and replacement Christ in Joseph Smith, while scientology was apparently invented by L. Ron Hubbard, a science fiction author, after he made a bet between fellow high profile sci-fi writers over a poker game that Hubbard could not start a new, successful religion of his own. All religions have their histories, that is, their “facts” that are used to justify their own false, corporate doctrines. Nevermind the repeated warnings of the Bible that we should call no man as “father” nor take any other doctrine (law) but that of the Bible. And that brings us back to the allegory of the passover… Let us be clear that this so-called _Jewish_ holiday, that of the celebration of the “pass-over” or paschal (lamb) sacrifice, was not the physical, literal killing or slaughtering of all the first born human sons and animals. That’s too ridiculous even for the Bible. But the consideration of it, that of the killing of children, was a powerful metaphorical conception that certainly did represent the taking away of the right of what is called _primogeniture_. This concept of law is not a physical attribute but a status, otherwise known in law as being the _firstborn_. And so we can quite fully understand the purpose of this allegory of the passover by simply understanding manmade law of the time, and therefore the purpose of putting to metaphoric _death_ that spiritual status, that is, a right

of succession.

PRIMOGENETURE – _noun_ – 1. THE STATE OF BEING THE FIRSTBORN CHILD. _‘MAUI AND TAHAKI ARE FAMOUS MYTHOLOGICAL HEROES IN POLYNESIA AND THEY HAVE MORE POWERFUL MANAS THAN THEIR ELDER BROTHERS, THOUGH THEY ARE NOT THE PRIMOGENITURES.’_ _‘AFTER THE SIN THE PRIMOGENITURES LOST THEIR PRIVILEGE OF SERVING IN THE HOLY TEMPLE AND IT WAS GIVEN TO THE LEVITES, WHO HAD ABSTAINED FROM THE SIN.’ _1.1 THE RIGHT OF SUCCESSION BELONGING TO THE FIRSTBORN CHILD, ESPECIALLY THE FEUDAL RULE BY WHICH THE WHOLE REAL ESTATE OF AN INTESTATE PASSED TO THE ELDEST SON. _(–Oxford Lexico.com Dictionary

online)_

PRIMOGENETURE – A HISTORICAL TERM THAT REFERS TO THE RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE FIRST-BORN CHILD AMONG SIBLINGS IN A FAMILY. WHEN USED IN THE LEGAL SENSE, THE TERM IS USED TO DISCUSS THE RIGHT OF THE ELDEST SON IN THE FAMILY TO INHERIT HIS PARENTS’ ESTATE UPON THEIR DEATH. THE INITIAL PURPOSE OF DETERMINING PRIMOGENITURE WAS TO KEEP AN ESTATE FROM BEING DIVIDED AMONG SIBLINGS. WHEN THIS WAS DONE, A PARCEL OF LAND WOULD CONTINUE TO GET SMALLER AND SMALLER, WHICH REDUCED THE VALUE OF THE OVERALL PROPERTY. TO EXPLORE THIS CONCEPT, CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PRIMOGENITURE DEFINITION.” PRIMOGENETURE – (_NOUN_) – THE STATE OF BEING THE FIRSTBORN CHILD IN THE FAMILY. THE SYSTEM OF INHERITANCE OR SUCCESSION OF THE FIRSTBORN CHILD, ESPECIALLY THE ELDEST SON. PRIMOGENETURE LAW – PRIMOGENITURE LAW HISTORICALLY DETERMINED THAT THE FIRST-BORN SON AMONG ALL OF A COUPLE’S CHILDREN WOULD INHERIT HIS PARENTS’ ENTIRE ESTATE UPON THEIR DEATHS. THE PURPOSE OF THIS WAS SO THAT THE PARCEL OF LAND WOULD NOT END UP BEING SO SUBDIVIDED THAT THE VALUE OF EACH INDIVIDUAL PARCEL WOULD PLUMMET. THE TERM “PRIMOGENITURE” WAS IMPLIED TO REFER TO MALE CHILDREN. IF THERE WERE NO MALE HEIRS, THEN PRIMOGENITURE LAW DETERMINED THAT THE PROPERTY WOULD BE DIVIDED UP AMONG THE DAUGHTERS IN EQUAL SHARES. PRIMOGENITURE LAW ACTUALLY HAILS FROM FEUDAL ENGLAND, AND DOES NOT EXIST IN THE UNITED STATES. _(–Legal dictionary online, at https://legaldictionary.net)_

–=–

Perhaps it slipped your mind that there happened to be no female children smitten by God (Jehovah) on that day of passover? Now, allegorically and legally, you know why. They simply were not male, and so not considered by law as “firstborn” and therefore had no right of primogeniture to put to figurative death. Disclaimer: _No female children were harmed during the making of this allegory._ This is what you might call as a big tell…

–=–

“AND IT CAME TO PASS, THAT AT MIDNIGHT THE LORD (JEHOVAH) SMOTE ALL THE FIRSTBORN IN THE LAND OF EGYPT, FROM THE FIRSTBORN OF PHARAOH THAT SAT ON HIS THRONE UNTO THE FIRSTBORN OF THE CAPTIVE THAT _WAS_ IN THE DUNGEON; AND ALL THE FIRSTBORN OF CATTLE.” (_–Exodus 12:29, KJB_).

–=–

Only the “firstborn” (primogeniture) were “smote” by Jehovah. In other words, the right of succession to God’s Kingdom was allegorically usurped. This, by law and custom, and therefore by default, necessarily did not include any female children, which were never considered as firstborn. Again, it was the status of inheritable blood that was made figuratively _dead_, not the actual life of the child. Yet the blood-right remained (was saved) with the children of the Israelites, who escaped the “destroyer” of the “firstborn,” this word _destroyer_ being a translation of the word _shachath, _which specifically means “moral corruption, rot, ruin, spoliation, perversion, or to be marred or marked (by evil/immorality).”” Yes, the _destroyer_ (of spirituality and Truth) put to _death_ all the “firstborn” male children (heirs), but this was a figurative, spiritual death, not a literal, physical

one.

It is also very important not to confuse the “Jews” with the Israelites. These terms are not the same. The Israelites were men that followed the Law of God, that is, the Christ (Logos) as Law. The Jews (יְהוּדִי – _Yĕhuwdiy; or Ἰουδαῖος, Ioudaios),_ were specifically defined as: “THE APOSTLE JOHN, INASMUCH AS AGREEABLY TO THE STATE OF THINGS IN HIS DAY HE LOOKED UPON THE JEWS AS A BODY OF MEN HOSTILE TO CHRISTIANITY, WITH WHOM HE HAD COME TO SEE THAT BOTH HE AND ALL TRUE CHRISTIANS HAD NOTHING IN COMMON AS RESPECTS RELIGIOUS MATTERS, EVEN IN HIS RECORD OF THE LIFE OF JESUS NOT ONLY HIMSELF MAKES A DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE JEWS AND JESUS, BUT ASCRIBES TO JESUS AND HIS APOSTLES LANGUAGE IN WHICH THEY DISTINGUISH THEMSELVES FROM THE JEWS, AS THOUGH THE LATTER SPRANG FROM AN ALIEN RACE: John 11:8

; John 13:33

. AND THOSE

WHO (NOT ONLY AT JERUSALEM, BUT ALSO IN GALILEE, CF. John 6:41

, 52

) OPPOSED HIS

DIVINE MASTER AND HIS MASTER’S CAUSE — ESPECIALLY THE RULERS, PRIESTS, MEMBERS OF THE SANHEDRIN, PHARISEES — HE DOES NOT HESITATE TO STYLE ΟἹ ἸΟΥΔΑΙ͂ΟΙ, SINCE THE HATRED OF THESE LEADERS EXHIBITS THE HATRED OF THE WHOLE NATION TOWARD JESUS: John 1:19

; John 2:18

, 20

; John 5:10

, 15ff

,John 5:18

; John 6:41

,52

; 7:1

,11

,13

; 9:18

,22

; 10:24

,31

,33

; 18:14

.”

_(–Strong’s Concordance #G2453 entry, quoting THAYER’S GREEK

LEXICON)_

–=–

Hmm… sounds a lot like secular Israel and the worldwide, mostly atheistic jews (_Ἰουδαῖοι_) of today, despite their masterful infiltration and blinding of Christian churches throughout

the world.

Oh, but surely Christians and Jews can live together in harmony under the same Law, right? A Christian-Jewish Alliance? Forget the Bible, you’re racist if you don’t think so. That’s scientifically proven by the propaganda arm of the ADL! As the Exodus story explains, it was the status of being firstborn (primogeniture), a legally recognized and spiritually induced (blood-right) status, that was in title only taken away from the Egyptians, including even Pharaoh’s own firstborn son (heir), whereas the firstborn of the Israelites (not jews) had their God-given rights preserved. God (Jehovah) figuratively passed over them in his taking away of the right of inheritance to God’s Kingdom, for they were not followers of the Law of Nature (God), that is, they did not respect the metaphoric lamb of God (Jesus Christ/Logos). But to understand this story the metaphor must be applied. Remember, this is not Clint’s opinion, this is defined straight out of the concordances and lexicons for the Bible. And this is just one of many hundreds of examples of the term _death_ being used figuratively, meaning spiritual death, and signifying a loss of inheritance and access to God’s Law to defeat man’s. All in all, the event is not even a religious one. In other words, it has nothing to do with religion, but is strictly an allegorical understanding of the law of inheritance and status as it applies to the Law of Nature (Christ). The Egyptians and the Jews were, of course, idolators. They worshiped the false (untrue, unnatural), Babylonian gods. In other words, they did not worship and obey Truth (Nature) and Its Law. And so their horrific sacrifices were also made to idols (false gods). IDOL – STRONG’S #G1497 – _EIDŌLON_ εἴδωλον, εἰδώλου, τό (εἶδος (cf. Winers Grammar, 96 (91); Etym. Magn. 296, 9)), in Greek writings from Homer down, AN IMAGE, LIKENESS, i. e. WHATEVER REPRESENTS THE FORM OF AN OBJECT, EITHER REAL OR IMAGINARY; used of the shades of the departed (in Homer), of apparitions, spectres, phantoms of the mind, etc.; in Biblical writings (AN IDOL, i. e.): 1. THE IMAGE OF A HEATHEN GOD: Acts 7:41

; 1

Corinthians 12:2

;

Revelation 9:20

(Isaiah 30:22

; 2

Chronicles 23:17

,

etc.; θεῶν ἤ δαιμον´ων εἴδωλα, Polybius 31, 3,

13);

2. A FALSE GOD: Acts 15:20

(on which

see ἀλίσγημα); Romans 2:22

; 1

Corinthians 8:4

, 7

; 1

Corinthians 10:19

; 2

Corinthians 6:16

; 1

Thessalonians 1:9

(often in the Sept.); φυλάσσειν ἑαυτόν ἀπό τῶν εἰδώλων, to guard oneself from all manner of fellowship with heathen worship, (1 John 5:21

).

–=–

Take the partaking (artificial sacrifice) of those little, corporately mass-produced, shitty-tasting little wafers and processed (unnatural), corporately manufactured grape (artificial) juice in church as a pretended “flesh” eating and “blood” drinking. What ever might the Bible say about that?

–=–

“AS CONCERNING THEREFORE THE EATING OF THOSE THINGS THAT ARE OFFERED IN SACRIFICE UNTO IDOLS, we know that AN IDOL (G1497

) _IS_

NOTHING IN THE WORLD, and that _THERE IS_ NONE OTHER GOD BUT ONE… Howbeit _there is_ not in every man that knowledge: FOR SOME WITH CONSCIENCE OF THE IDOL (G1497) UNTO THIS HOUR EAT _IT_ AS A THING OFFERED UNTO AN IDOL; AND THEIR CONSCIENCE BEING WEAK IS DEFILED.” _—1 Corinthians 8: 4,7, KJB_

–=–

“AND WERE ALL BAPTIZED UNTO MOSES IN THE CLOUD AND IN THE SEA; AND DID ALL EAT THE SAME SPIRITUAL MEAT; AND DID ALL DRINK THE SAME SPIRITUAL DRINK: FOR THEY DRANK OF THAT SPIRITUAL ROCK THAT FOLLOWED THEM: AND THAT ROCK WAS CHRIST.” _—1 Corinthians 10: 2-4_

–=–

“BE NOT CARRIED ABOUT WITH DIVERS AND STRANGE DOCTRINES. FOR _IT IS_ A GOOD THING THAT THE HEART BE ESTABLISHED WITH GRACE; NOT WITH MEATS, WHICH HAVE NOT PROFITED THEM THAT HAVE BEEN OCCUPIED

THEREIN.”

_—Hebrews 13: 9, KJB_

–=–

Not only does the New Law of God (Christ) state not to worship or sacrifice idols, it also tells you that your meats should be spiritual, not worldly. And, of course, we find here one of many warnings not to follow strange doctrines, which basically is a reference to all modern, so-called “Christian” religions (worldly, secular corporations) and their useless, worldly ceremonies and rituals. The Bible is clear never to worship God in any of man’s false traditions, or in other words, never worship or pray to God through any artificial (manmade) invention. Astoundingly, due to the stark ignorance of today’s populations in all nations, the planned reinvention and construction of the idol of the “Third Temple” reinvoking the Old, Babylonian law is under way. Here we find again blatant, and in my opinion purposeful, willful ignorance of the metaphoric, allegoric nature of the Biblical stories of the first two temples therein. This third temple can, according to the Bible, only stand and represent idolatry at its worst. Over and over we read that God’s Kingdom is not found in anything built by the hands of men. God’s Realm is Creation, not the resourced recreation of men. Therefore, any temple or other corporate church building is an idol, and every religion is necessarily a false, reinvented doctrine designed and incorporated (made legal under man’s false law) to misalign and replace God’s Law (doctrine) as told in Biblical allegory. The True Christian has no religion but that of unwaveringly following the example of Jesus Christ without artifice, s the personification of Logos (the Law of the Universe). And that just doesn’t include anything built by the hands (or minds) of men. For the Law of Nature, the Law of God, is self-Evident, self-Existent, as all of Nature and the Universe is, not an invention

of man.

But in modern, Zionist-Jewish thought, from one Rabbi HaRav Avraham Yitzchak HaCohen Kook, the First Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi of Israel, revered and famed Torah sage, philosopher, writer, poet, iconic and beloved leader of religious Zionism and the return to Zion (1865-1935), is as expected completely foreign and opposed to Christ (God’s Law of Nature), using logical fallacy to promote pointless animal slaughter as idol sacrifice: WILL THERE BE SACRIFICES IN THE THIRD TEMPLE? Rav Kook’s views on the Temple service are sometimes misconstrued. A superficial reading of a passage in Olat Re’iyah (vol. I, p. 292) indicates that only grain offerings will be offered in the reinstated Temple service. To properly understand Rav Kook’s approach, it is necessary to read a related essay from Otzarot HaRe’iyah.] What will the rebuilt Temple be like? Will we really offer animal sacrifices once again?

PROTECTING ANIMALS

Some people object to the idea of sacrifices out of concern for the welfare of animals. However, this objection contains a measure of hypocrisy. Why should compassion for animals only be expressed with regard to humanity’s spiritual needs? If our opposition to animal slaughter is based not on weakness of character, but on recognition of the issue’s fundamental morality, then our first step should be to outlaw the killing of animals for food, clothing, and other material

benefits.

In the world’s present state, the human race is weak, both physically and morally. The hour to protect animal life has not yet arrived. We still need to slaughter animals for our physical needs, and human morality requires that we maintain clear boundaries to distinguish between the relative value of human and animal life. At this point in time, to advocate the protection of animals in our service of God is disingenuous. Is it moral to permit cruelty towards animals for our physical needs, yet forbid their use for our spiritual service, in sincere recognition and gratitude for God’s kindness? If our dedication and love for God can be expressed – at its highest level – with our willingness to surrender our own lives and die al kiddush Hashem, sanctifying God’s name, then certainly we should be willing to forgo the life of animals for this sublime goal…

HINTS TO THE FUTURE

Even in the current reality, we may feel uncomfortable about killing animals. This does not mean that the time for full animal rights has already arrived. Rather, these feelings come from a hidden anticipation of the future that is already ingrained in our souls, like many other spiritual aspirations. Hints of these future changes may be found in the text of the Torah itself. Thus, it says that offerings are slaughtered on the northern side of the altar. Why this side? The north traditionally represents that which is incomplete and lacking, as it is written, “Out of the north, the evil shall break forth” (Jeremiah 1:14). In other words, the need to slaughter animals is a temporary concession to life in an incomplete world. Furthermore, the Torah stipulates that sacrifices must be slaughtered “lirtzonchem” – “willingly”(Lev. 19:5). The Temple service must correspond to our needs and wants. As the Talmud in Erchin21a explains, one must be able to say, “I want to bring this offering.” When the slaughter of animals is no longer generally acceptable to society, this condition will not be fulfilled. Finally, the Torah describes a person offering an animal sacrifice as “adam” (Lev. 1:2). This word indicates our current state of moral decline, a result of the unresolved sin of Adam, the first man. An individual offering a grain offering, on the other hand, is called “nefesh,” or “soul” (Lev. 2:1). The word nefesh implies a deeper, more essential level of humanity, independent of any temporary failings. _(Excerpt from: Arutz Sheva 7, IsraelNationalNews.com – quoting from _Gold from the Land of Israel _ pp. 173-176. Adapted from Otzarot HaRe’iyah, vol. II, pp. 101-103; Olat Re’iyah vol. I, p. 292, sent to Arutz Sheva by Rabbi Chanan Morrison, _RavKookTorah.org _)_

–=–

Read that again, would ya? This blatant, temple-based return to the idolatry of the Babylonian, Mosaic Old Law should be a frightening nightmare to any moral man, yet we find the entirety of the so-called “Christian” religions brainwashed to be in praise and service to this Biblically defined, anti-Christ brood. This is the ultimate in antichrist rhetoric and action. This is literally the undoing of the allegory and purpose of the Christ story. This is the killing of Jesus Christ, in other words, the destruction of the New Testament Law (Law of Nature) and the reinstatement of the Old, secular Babylonian law. To be antichrist is to be against God’s Law, the New Testament, as exemplified by the allegory (example) of Christ. This is the very definition of the biblical word _Jew_, as we read above. It’s what all Christians should expect from Jews, again, as defined in the Bible. It’s their reason for existence, to defeat what they call openly as the false savior, Jesus Christ (New Law). This has nothing to do with race, or opinion, and everything to do with moral, spiritual consciousness toward Jehovah (Nature), that is, God’s Creation and Its Law. And so we come, in the Bible, to where the reasoning behind this turning point from the law of men under Babylon and its false gods to the Law of Nature is explained, as the emergence of the New Law (Testament) based on the allegory of Jesus Christ. The purpose behind the Christ allegory, that is, the personification (story) of Jesus Christ as a man following the Law of Nature (Jehovah), was quite eloquently authored to replace the Babylonian hell of these idolators and their bloody, sacrificial rituals to false gods. This was made quite clear in the 9th chapter of Hebrews:

Heb 9:1  –

Then verily the first _covenant_ had also ORDINANCES of divine service, and a WORLDLY sanctuary.

Heb 9:2  –

For there was a tabernacle made; the first, wherein _was _the candlestick, and the table, and the shewbread; which is called the

sanctuary.

Heb 9:3  –

And after the second veil, THE TABERNACLE WHICH IS CALLED THE HOLIEST OF ALL; _(_Author’s note: see here that a building made by the hands of men is called the Holiest of all instead of that which is God or a Creation of God’s Nature_. In other words, these temples were sanctuaries against Jehovah/Nature, not in support of It.)_

Heb 9:4  –

Which had the golden censer, and the ark of the covenant overlaid round about with gold, wherein _was_ the golden pot that had manna, and Aaron’s rod that budded, and the tables of the covenant;

Heb 9:5  –

And over it the cherubims of glory shadowing the mercy seat; of which we cannot now speak particularly.

Heb 9:6  –

Now when these things were thus ORDAINED, the priests went always into the first tabernacle, accomplishing the service _of God_.

Heb 9:7  –

But into the second _went_ THE HIGH PRIEST ALONE ONCE EVERY YEAR, NOT WITHOUT BLOOD, WHICH HE OFFERED FOR HIMSELF, AND _FOR_ THE ERRORS OF THE PEOPLE:

Heb 9:8  –

The Holy Ghost this signifying, that THE WAY INTO THE HOLIEST OF ALL WAS NOT YET MADE MANIFEST, while as the first tabernacle was yet

standing:

Heb 9:9  –

WHICH _WAS_ A FIGURE (IDOL) FOR THE TIME THEN PRESENT, IN WHICH WERE OFFERED BOTH GIFTS AND SACRIFICES, THAT COULD NOT MAKE HIM THAT DID THE SERVICE PERFECT, AS PERTAINING TO THE CONSCIENCE;

Heb 9:10

_ – WHICH

STOOD_ ONLY IN MEATS AND DRINKS, AND DIVERS WASHINGS, AND CARNAL ORDINANCES, IMPOSED _ON THEM_ until the time of reformation.

Heb 9:11  –

BUT CHRIST BEING COME AN HIGH PRIEST OF GOOD THINGS TO COME, BY A GREATER AND MORE PERFECT TABERNACLE, NOT MADE WITH HANDS, that is to say, NOT OF THIS BUILDING (_IDOL_);

Heb 9:12  –

NEITHER BY THE BLOOD OF GOATS AND CALVES, BUT BY HIS OWN BLOOD HE ENTERED IN ONCE INTO THE HOLY PLACE, HAVING OBTAINED ETERNAL REDEMPTION _FOR US_.

Heb 9:13  –

For if the blood of bulls and of goats, and the ashes of an heifer sprinkling the unclean, sanctifieth to the purifying of the flesh:

Heb 9:14  –

HOW MUCH MORE SHALL THE BLOOD OF CHRIST, WHO THROUGH THE ETERNAL SPIRIT OFFERED HIMSELF WITHOUT SPOT TO GOD, PURGE YOUR CONSCIENCE FROM DEAD WORKS TO SERVE THE LIVING GOD?

Heb 9:15  –

And for this cause he is the mediator of the new testament, that BY MEANS OF DEATH, FOR THE REDEMPTION OF THE TRANSGRESSIONS _THAT WERE_ UNDER THE FIRST TESTAMENT, THEY WHICH ARE CALLED MIGHT RECEIVE THE PROMISE OF ETERNAL INHERITANCE.

Heb 9:16  –

FOR WHERE A TESTAMENT _IS_, THERE MUST ALSO OF NECESSITY BE THE DEATH

OF THE TESTATOR.

Heb 9:17  –

FOR A TESTAMENT _IS_ OF FORCE AFTER MEN ARE DEAD: OTHERWISE IT IS OF NO STRENGTH AT ALL WHILE THE TESTATOR LIVETH.

Heb 9:18  –

WHEREUPON NEITHER THE FIRST _TESTAMENT_ WAS DEDICATED WITHOUT BLOOD.

Heb 9:19  –

For when Moses had spoken every precept to all the people ACCORDING TO THE LAW, he took the blood of calves and of goats, with water, and scarlet wool, and hyssop, and sprinkled both the book, and all the

people,

Heb 9:20  –

Saying, This _is_ the blood of the testament which God hath enjoined

unto you.

Heb 9:21  –

Moreover he sprinkled with blood both the tabernacle, and all the vessels of the ministry.

Heb 9:22  –

AND ALMOST ALL THINGS ARE BY THE LAW PURGED WITH BLOOD; AND WITHOUT SHEDDING OF BLOOD IS NO REMISSION.

Heb 9:23

– _IT

WAS_ THEREFORE NECESSARY THAT THE PATTERNS OF THINGS IN THE HEAVENS SHOULD BE PURIFIED WITH THESE; BUT THE HEAVENLY THINGS THEMSELVES WITH BETTER SACRIFICES THAN THESE.

Heb 9:24  –

FOR CHRIST IS NOT ENTERED INTO THE HOLY PLACES MADE WITH HANDS, _WHICH ARE_ THE FIGURES (IDOLS) OF THE TRUE; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us:

Heb 9:25  –

Nor yet that he should offer himself often, as the high priest entereth into the holy place every year WITH BLOOD OF OTHERS;

Heb 9:26  –

For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of the world: but now once in the end of the world hath he appeared TO PUT AWAY SIN BY THE SACRIFICE OF HIMSELF.

Heb 9:27  –

AND AS IT IS APPOINTED UNTO MEN ONCE TO DIE, but after this the

judgment:

Heb 9:28  –

SO CHRIST WAS ONCE OFFERED TO BEAR THE SINS OF MANY; AND UNTO THEM THAT LOOK FOR HIM SHALL HE APPEAR THE SECOND TIME WITHOUT SIN UNTO

SALVATION.

–=–

The point? Worshiping God through idols was ceased, where Jesus Christ (personification and example of Logos) replaced those idols. We are called in the New Testament not to worship Jesus Christ as God or as an idol, but to become Christlike in our actions under Gods Law so as to worship Jehovah. Instead of sacrificing idols to God, we are to be the sacrifice ourselves, sacrificing (crucifying) all worldly things so as to live spiritually, in the Realm of God’s Nature and under Its Law. We are to become the sons of God by following the example. In this way, the sacrifice is Real, not made in idolatry, or in other words, we act on and under the Law of God (Nature) instead of just using idols as an excuse not to follow that Law. In essence, what this is saying is that a man cannot make his sins disappear in some mock, ceremonial atonement, by killing , mutilating, and bleeding dry some poor defenseless animal that is part of God’s Creation, for this pointless, purposeless murder of an innocent beast is certainly a sin in and of itself. It makes about as much sense as hunting elephants and giraffes for sport. You cannot cleanse your own blood of its sin by taking that of another, completely innocent beast. No, it is you that must stop acting like a beast, sacrificing from your spiritual Life that which is of the world of the flesh, the world of men (i.e. secularism, legalism). Instead of slaying innocent beasts as the Babylonian false gods demanded, man must follow the example of Christ (the Law of Nature personified) in order to rectify ones own sin — to be reborn from the realm of man’s law into the realm of God’s Law, in order to go back to Nature (God). In other words, this means that the legal person, the respect of fiction and the law that governs fiction, the lies, must die (metaphorically), so that the spiritual man may emerge without legal ties (false law) that prevent a man from acting under God’s Law. One cannot be saved from the trappings of false religion and worldly afflictions through useless killing in idolatry. It is our blood that must be spiritually purified. Thus, the Christ allegory is a guidepost allowing all men to return from the Babylonian woe, from Jewish (antichrist) influence, back to the very Nature we are born originally into. We that shed what the Bible refers to as _sin_ can only do so by following the Law of Nature (Logos). For sin is just a general term meaning artifice, lies, fictions, idolatry, and self-deceit. SYN. That which is synthetic, not of Nature, not of God’s Realm or under Its’ Law. So let’s put these pieces together here… The Bible Law (i.e. common law of blood-right) says that in order for a testament to be valid, its testator (author) must be dead. No death, no inheritance. So one must ask oneself, how does an undying, “Living God” (Jehovah), defined as the entirety of Existence, the Universe and Nature Itself in Supreme Being (the verb Being, as Existence Itself), construct such a testament and still remain the eternal, never-ending, Living God? Here we may better understand the purpose behind the allegory of the Son (testator) of God, or He that was allegorically sent to die for our sins, in order that the New Testament (New Law of God) might be left to all men through death, a requirement of the law of the testator. This is figuratively the exact story played out in the maxims of law. In other words, this is an allegorical representation of what all men must suffer; namely, to be reborn from civil (legal) death in exchange for spiritual (True) Life under God, under the Law of Nature (Jehovah), personified in the story (allegory) of Christ. And yet it is so clearly written here that this True Life of substance without idolatry and empty sacrifice cannot be attained by merely participating in religious ceremonies and false sacrificial “communions” of eating _meats_ (defined scripturally as any foodstuffs, literal or figurative) to false idols. This ceremonial custom of animal sacrifice, in fact, is surprisingly, completely against scripture, as we can read above. Just as you can’t squeeze blood from a turnip, as the saying goes, you certainly cannot squeeze the spiritual (figurative) blood of christ (atonement/forgiveness of sins) out of a communion wafer or other idol, and especially not from one of God’s own innocent Creatures. And no, grape juice is not a substitute for the works of, in, and under the blood of christ (Logos – God’s Law personified). While the current false doctrines of corporate, religious gobbledygook and the ceremonial nonsense it promotes is enough to drive men away from such spiritually sound principles as the notion of the True meaning and intent behind the “blood of christ” and the reason for this story of the ultimate sacrifice by God — that a testament necessarily means the death of its testator — we may understand that the never-ending, never-changing God (Jehovah) cannot die lest we all figuratively die with It, waking up to our True, spiritual Nature. Therefore, the Son of God must be sacrificed, so that the Law (Will) of God may be testified and transferred to us. But in order to inherit this set of principles, we must become the sons of God ourselves. Jesus Christ is our example of how to do this, by following the Law of God. As Its sons, we become the spiritual, figurative primogeniture of God’s Kingdom (Nature). If you try and take this as literal, you will never understand It nor find yourself in It. You must reach deep down and find what is lost, that is, the ability to Love and cherish such moral stories and allegories for what they are intended to give you, learning from them as intended, and then acting accordingly. Poetry is, it turns out, for Real men. In other words, man may now Live Truly under this New Testament of Law, by the Will of Jehovah, by following in the sacrificial (metaphoric) blood of christ as a brotherhood of God’s sons. And what is so beautiful about this concept is that it literally requires nothing. No thing. No persons, places, or things (nouns/names). It is the negative Law, the Law of Truth, and Truth has no name (noun). It is the realm of God, of Nature, of that which is unblemished by the names and titles and defects and marks and fictional rights of man’s law and custom. He that is of God is the lesser part of God. Yet he who falls from such Grace is still of the Greater Good (God), the Higher Whole, but is tricked into allowing (consenting) that which is lesser in Law to overtake him. For the Greater always contains the lesser, just as the principal always contains the agent, the truster the trustee, the employer the employee, and so on. Hierarchically speaking, the power and Glory and Grace of that which is of Jehovah never loses its power or its Law, for the Law of Nature reigns supreme at all times, knowing that without it no Existence of any kind, Real or artificial, would Exist, as all self-Existence is literally Jehovah defined. All other forms of so-called “existence” are artificial, or that which is a re-creation of man. Thus, the foundational, scripture-based maxims of law spell out and follow exactly what one would expect. But there is a problem. For the scriptures, after so much shared wisdom and warning with regards to the trickery of men and the simple instructions given from the perspective of being in Grace in recognizing everything that is false and of the father of lies (i.e. the re-creations of man influenced by devilish, adversarial intentions), also give us the free will to go against the Will of God, to break the Law and Covenant. The willing fool has no place in God’s Realm and has no access to God’s Law. He that should worship and express joy by the deceits and trickery of the lies of mans’ artifice, enjoining himself to that which is below him in persona (mask) and flattering title (idol), shall then be under the law of that which is lower than him, representing spiritual death, as the inability to govern ones own actions under God’s Law. So says the Bible — and thus the foundational maxims of law agree. Many of the Highest maxims of law are simply constructs stripped from the Bible. This should be of no surprise when one understands that the Bible (as the unwritten, moral Law) is the foundation of the common law, and that, therefore, the unwritten was copied unto the written (Roman) law for the purposes of opposition. In other words, the unwritten, moral law must be recognized in order for the written, immoral law to have purpose, otherwise there is no reason for man’s law. Without recognition of Christ (God’s Law/Logos) there is no need or use for anything anti-christ. There is no left without right, no up without down, no light without darkness, no evil without good. To understand this, one must understand that God’s Law is neutral, whereas the Law of Rome is strict and sanctioned (punishable). By neutrality I mean that God’s Law is the Law of Nature, as is an inevitable Act of God, meaning the Act had nothing to do with man’s designs, inventions, or interference. It just Is. It Exists with or without man’s presence. A lightening strike causing a fire is an Act of God. It is a neutral event in Nature, and only a fool would believe it to be targeted at anything or sent for the purposes of some man’s judgement. What arrogance, conceit, and outright idiocy must it take for any man to believe that the power of the Universe (God) can or should be directed at any other man, or upon oneself. Yes, I will certainly concede that the idiot that ignorantly walks into a lightening storm without the fear of the Universe (God’s Nature and Law) increases his chances of being _judged _for his stupidity, if you will. But the purpose of that discharge of energy we call as lightening has for its purpose nothing to do with any man or any other object it connects with. If man didn’t exist, lightening would still strike wherever Nature’s Design warranted it. And so it is with the notion of God’s Judgment. When the Law of God, the Law of Nature, and the Laws of Nature are broken, then it is only reasonable to conclude that some consequence (judgement) will follow, rebalancing the metaphorical scales of Nature’s permanent Design. Poison the drinking well, and the user of that well will be judged (poisoned) for his own sin. Eat unnaturally according to FDA recommendations and be judged with obesity, diabetes, cancer, or other illness. This is a neutral, or rather a causality effect, not a religious one. We reap what we sow, and most of the time we deserve the fate we create for

ourselves.

The deceits promulgated by the church and state are seemingly insurmountable at times, just as the perceived need of money, the root fo all evil, is certainly the great _destroyer_ of our time. To be deceived is a choice, and the Bible allows all men to be deceived if they choose to be. Free will… And, of course, the legal law of men depends upon deceit. Without deceit, there would be no nations, no governments, and no false gods heading those governments. The maxims of man’s law repeatedly tell us that he who seeks to be deceived cannot then complain about being deceived when he acts voluntarily in that deceit. Deceit is made legal by governments of the legal (artificial) realm, by contract, and specifically by voluntary participation in that deceitful practice. Contracts are the strings that control the puppet, which is why the Bible forbids them. For a contract is always between legal persons and therefore under the law of fictional (legal) persons, not God’s Law. Ignorance of God’s Law is no more an excuse than ignorance of man’s legal law according to its maxims and to the Bible. The difference is plain though, for the Bible warns against such deceits and gives you the Law of God (the allegory of Christ personified) in order to escape them. Thus, God’s Word (Law) is said to be the Armor of God, or in other words, the Shield and Sword of Truth (God). The Truth (God) will set you free, but only if you follow the Law of God (Truth/Nature) exemplified by the allegory of Christ. The legal system wholly depends on self-deceit, on illusion, on trickery, on dissimulation, and on the fact that those that are deceived remain in such a state of decay.

Job 12:16

– With him _is_ strength and wisdom: THE DECEIVED AND THE DECEIVER _ARE_ HIS (_THE DESTROYERS’_).

2Ti 3:13  –

But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, DECEIVING, AND

BEING DECEIVED.

Deu 11:16

– Take

heed to yourselves, THAT YOUR HEART BE NOT DECEIVED, AND YE TURN ASIDE, AND SERVE OTHER GODS, AND WORSHIP THEM;

Job 15:31

– Let not

him that is deceived trust in vanity: for VANITY SHALL BE HIS

RECOMPENCE.

Luk 21:8  –

And he said, Take heed that ye be not deceived: for MANY SHALL COME IN MY NAME, SAYING, I AM _CHRIST_; and the time draweth near: GO YE NOT THEREFORE AFTER THEM.

1Co 6:9-10

– Know ye

not that THE UNRIGHTEOUS SHALL NOT INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit

the kingdom of God.

1Co 6:11-12

– And such

were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but YE ARE JUSTIFIED IN THE NAME OF THE LORD JESUS, AND BY THE SPIRIT OF OUR GOD. All things are lawful unto me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the

power of any.

1Co 15:33

–  Be

not deceived: EVIL COMMUNICATIONS CORRUPT GOOD MANNERS.

Gal 6:7  –

Be not deceived; GOD IS NOT MOCKED: FOR WHATSOEVER A MAN SOWETH, THAT SHALL HE ALSO REAP.

Rev 18:23

– AND THE

LIGHT OF A CANDLE SHALL SHINE NO MORE AT ALL IN THEE; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants (corporations) were the great men (artificial persons) of the earth; FOR BY THY SORCERIES (PHARMACOPEIA) WERE ALL

NATIONS DECEIVED.

–=–

There is only one Law of Existence, of Nature, of Reality. The word Law is hardly adequate to describe It, for what word can possibly define what is self-Evident? This self-Existent (non-man-made) Order or Design is called as God’s Law, for God Is Reality, Is Truth, Is Nature, and Is All self-Existence — all that is not man-made. This Order of Nature, called as the Law of Nature (God), stands in self-evidence without exception, and is not alterable by men or by the artificial laws invented by men. All other so-called law is man-made, is consensual, voluntary, temporary, meaning that it must be contracted like any disease. And like a disease, man’s law will die without a host, without a volunteer, without victims; but only if you stop respecting it as Real, as part of God’s Nature. It always requires the breaking with the Law of God (Nature). There are no exceptions. There is no other law (doctrine) that does not specifically require one to break the Law of God, for no law of man is a self-evident part of God, that is, of Existence (Truth). No law of man is also a Law of Nature. There is no purpose for any law invented by man except to break the Law of God. There is no permit or license that is not intended to break with the Law of God. There is no legal person, place, or thing (name/noun) that is not intended to exist outside of the Realm and thus Law of God’s Nature. There is no positive invention by man that is not intended to control, harness, deceive, or destroy that which is a negative (already Existing) Creation of God. Man can only create artifice (art), and another word for art is _technology_. Only when mans creation is in harmony with and designed to protect and serve Nature can it be of the Will and Testament (Law/Word) of God. All of this is self-evident Truth, for the only Truth is God and that which is Created under and in harmony with Its Law. God does not invent, only man does. The fool may consider such rhetoric to be a form of circular logic (dialectic). And yet no logic of man need be applied to the self-Existence of Godly things (of Nature). The circular notion of false logic is apparent by the flaws of its argument in referential to man-made (artificial) support for its accuracy. No-one can argue that Nature, in any way, is illogical, nor especially unreasonable. Its Design is beyond man’s capability of comprehension by use of the vulgar languages (including mathamatics), as all spiritual things are. What appears to the sophist as a circular logic is the very power of the negative aspect of Nature, which cannot be defeated by any positive (invention of man), unless one consents to that legal (anti-God) “fact” or “invention/design.” But a fact is not a Truth, and no facts need Exist in Nature, for Existence itself is self-evident Truth. Truth (God) needs no positively considered or pretended facts to Exist, and neither therefore does man. And that’s the point! That’s the power of God (Truth) — of being an anonymous part of God and thus part of and under the authority of the only whole and Highest Truth. In a spiritual and yes even circular way, one is protected from all lies when one remains in this circle of Truth, never allowing fiction and lies to break that spiritual circle. As they say, the Truth will set you free. For this circle is Real. It is Reality; the cycle of Nature. It is the realm of those who Live in and by the Grace of God and never accept what man has to offer in contract and thus become bound under the law of contracts (persons). For remember, a contract is only needed for those who seek to break with the Will and Testament (Law) of God, of self-government, of Love, Charity, Trust, Truth, and self-discipline. There are no contracts in Nature, in Love, in Charity, nor especially in Forgiveness. Understand this, and you may then literally and spiritually “under-stand” God’s Law. But if you comprehend it without applying it, you are indeed the very definition of a hypocrite (idolator).

–=–

“A CONTRACT FOUNDED ON A BASE AND UNLAWFUL CONSIDERATION, OR AGAINST GOOD MORALS, IS NULL.” _–Contractus ex turpi causa, vel contra bonos mores nullus est. Hob. 167; Dig. 2, 14, 27, 4._

–=–

“THE LAW NEVER SUFFERS ANYTHING CONTRARY TO TRUTH. BUT SOMETIMES IT ALLOWS A CONCLUSIVE PRESUMPTION IN OPPOSITION TO TRUTH.” _–Contra veritatem lex numquam aliquid permittit. ” 2 Co. Inst. 252. 24 See 3 Bouv. Inst. n. 3061._

–=–

“THE AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES OVERCOMES OR PREVAILS AGAINST THE

LAW.”

_–Conventio vincit legem. 2 Story, Ag. § See Dig. 16, 3, 1, 6._

–=–

The foundational maxims of law do not suffer anything that is not of the realm of Truth. But when a man can be tricked and deceived into entering into the legal contracts of the devil (attorneys), then this maxim invoking the power of Truth is bypassed. The law will suffer anything you can be deceived into accepting and volunteering for. For under contract, the Armor of Truth (God) is stripped from every man. To avoid what is avoidable (man’s inventions and false, legal law) one must consciously avoid it. But once we accept or contract into what is avoidable, namely fraud, what is avoidable becomes unavoidable. This is where most of us stand. We are accepting and participating contractually in fraud (hypocrisy). The contract is valid because we don’t call it what it is. And if we do, if we understand the fraud, none of us are acting morally against it. Words are idols if those words are not acted upon, and so calling something as fraud while still acting in it is idolatry. Thus, we are still volunteering in that which is avoidable, for to nullify an immoral or otherwise unlawful contract under both realms of the law one must act with moral rectitude in opposition and avoidance against it. We are not doing so. The contract is lawful as long as the parties agree to it. And our agreement comes not in the form of words, but in the form of our actions in support of those legal (artificial) words. Contracts are excuses not to act under God’s Law. We act in the fraud, that is, in legal persona, therefore we accept the fraud. We pretended to become the fiction (person/title) and continue to pretend to be it. In other words, we are not following Christ (God’s Law), and are instead accepting the false, legal law (doctrine) of men. The legal system cannot be made null until men stop acting legally within it (against God’s Nature and Law). And most importantly, we cannot worship God nor follow Christ (Law) while acting in a legal persona (mask) that is required as property (status inside) of government to follow the legal, man-made, anti-God, antichrist, false law of men. This was and is the reason behind the New Law, the New Testament, the allegorical blood sacrifice of Jesus Christ (Logos). We are part of the story. We were, through and because of the sacrifice of Logos, given cosmic free will. We were given the ability to attempt to break with the Law of Nature in a legal matrix of total self-deceit, though in Reality this is impossible. We were allowed to play the fool. But once we recognize ourselves as the fool, as I have recognized myself to be, it’s this point in our lives that we must either die to the secular world in order to find spiritual Life under God and Its Law, or we will continue, as so many of us are, to live by the deceits of the flesh in self-deceit and in hypocrisy. If you’ve read this up to this point, then you know right now whether you are a hypocrite like me, or you are a son of God. If you are pretending to be the idol of a “Christian” then you know that such a placed upon yourself as a flattering title is either well-deserved by your actions or is carried in deceit as a false show in idolatry. And finally, you know now that the Bible cannot be dismissed as religious nonsense, and that should you choose to lift yourself out of this voluntary self-deceit that it’s you and only you that has the power to become Christ-like, to make the allegory of Christ become your own True story. You have the Armor. Now you must decide to bear it or throw it off for the sins (untruths) of the

secular world.

And if you’re honest with yourself right now, you know the Truth is that you already know the answer, you already know your decision, because you already know the path, and from this point on you are either on that path or you are not. For most of you, including myself, this is what it feels like to Truly be a hypocrite.

Welcome to hell…

.

–Clint richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com) –Wednesday, August 21st, 2019

Advertisements

Report this ad

Report this ad

7 Comments

by realitybloger

on _August

21, 2019_  •  Permalink Posted in bible as remedy in law

,

Bible study

, king

james version

,

Law vs Legal

, Legal

Language

Tagged allegory of christ

, bible

law , crucifixion

of christ

, did

jesus christ exist

,

hypocrisy , jesus

christ as logos

,

jesus christ in bible

, jews

and christians friends

,

judaism and christianity

,

king james version

, kjb

story of christ

, logos

, logos logic

, resin behind

death of Jesus

,

what is a jew

, who was

jesus

_Posted by realitybloger on August 21, 2019_ https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2019/08/21/a-deconstruction-of-the-death-of-christ-its-not-what-you-think/ ORWELL’S NEW LAW: INTOLERANCE IS TOLERANCE

—=—

“A MAN IN DEBT IS SO FAR A SLAVE.” _—Ralph Waldo Emerson_

—=—

I’ve got something to say, and you probably aren’t going to like it. And try as you will to dispute it, the Truth is a piercing sword, unable to be deflected even in this time of great deceit — this

grand delusion.

Yes, _freedom is slavery_. It’s called the commercial franchise of national citizenship (legally called as _freedom_), a reimagined form of denizenship as a post-modern neo-feudalistic form of the same old debt-slavery of yesteryear. Yes, we understand that _war is peace_. These are merely the two different extremes of a legally (secularly) bound international commerce, the state of war being a violent purge of uncooperative nations or people (tribes) seeking independence from a slave-inducing, interconnected world currency and its performance-debtor slave system through extortive taxation and internationally imposed sanctions. When the violent, murderous trade war ceases, the then subdued, defeated nations submit to the usual forced but supposedly voluntary “peace” of commerce via international trade yet again. The difference between war and peace is merely a declaration of one or the other, though both have the same goal, to profit the elite bloodlines of archons behind nation-building and United Nations programs that assure free-flowing commerce (peace) between those internationally bound corporations (nations). And yes, we have witnessed globally that_ ignorance is strength_. But this phenomenon is only understandable from the perspective of national governments toward their enslaved, enfranchised (free range) masses (common human live-stock), as we are hopelessly educated and entrained by entertainments and standardized, institutionalized lies (also called history), and of course what is quickly becoming our very own censored, institutionalized _newspeak_. My people around the world are, without a doubt, being destroyed and controlled through a mandated, standardized system that teaches and instills a guaranteed lack of knowledge. It’s called public education. But there is an underlying Orwellian, that is, dystopian maxim that stands as the foundation for all of this, the source behind all three of these seemingly paradoxical but fully demonstrable states of induced, artificial existence detached from Nature (God), which have led to this now globalist _Newspeak_ society we pretend to exist in. There is one ingredient, one agenda that must be pushed universally for this trifecta of dark, globalist tyranny to prevail… There must be a despotically enforced, unequivocal (absolute) state of artificial, passively consented-to tolerance.

—=—

“OUR RULERS CAN HAVE NO AUTHORITY OVER NATURAL RIGHTS, ONLY AS WE HAVE SUBMITTED TO THEM. THE RIGHTS OF CONSCIENCE WE NEVER SUBMITTED. WE ARE ANSWERABLE FOR THEM TO OUR GOD. The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as injurious to others.” _—Thomas Jefferson_

—=—

What is the highest moral (Natural) Law? To do no harm, without exception, including the use of words as weapons. What do the governments of men thrive upon? Doing harm, and more specifically causing us all to harm one another in any way _legally_ possible (permissively through words) as a dysfunctional lifestyle. In other words, creating and administering dystopia — a debtor’s

hell.

Our society is like a poker game, consisting of a set of neighbors (players/actors) that pretend a sort of cordial camaraderie and shallow friendship while secretly seeking to competitively out-do, defeat, destroy, and bankrupt each other. Every player at the poker table is necessarily, situationally, and by disposition subjected into being a member of the anti-cult of _the Joneses_, always seeking to one-up each other, prideful and miserly of their continued earnings, existing solely for the purpose of profit and gain. Meanwhile, the dealer (government and banker) sets and administrates the rules of this necessary, mutually required illicit conduct, allowing legally (permissively) this abhorrent behavior within a prescribed, licensed set of rules. For this administrative “service” the dealer (government) legally steals (taxes) for its own profit the total wealth spent in each transaction (poker hand), raking in a small percentage from each round of cards (commerce) being dealt for the house — an administrative fee, of course. But as the total money left on the table is constantly diminished by this house service charge (called _the take_), each neighbor must constantly refresh the money pool with his own savings or, finally, leave bankrupt (as a broke loser). Essentially, this is how governments corral and subjugate their common citizenry, setting the rules of “commerce” (the rules of the game) so that we are all constantly practicing deceit and treachery toward one another while feigning to be good neighbors, the ultimate hypocrisy (simulation). It’s just business, we are entrained to say, as if this is some viable excuse to break the highest law of Nature (God) to love your neighbor, to do no harm, and to act always in love, charity, and forgiveness. But, of course, there would be no poker games or need for government if this moral, spiritual, “unwritten” Law was respected absolutely. Gambling, as does citizenship, requires God’s Law (and therefore natural rights) to be trampled underfoot. In legality, the only _duty_ that can be found is the taxation laid upon us all. Instead of acknowledging and fulfilling our moral duty to all men, we pay a duty (tax) so that we don’t have to. Legalism is, after all, the undoing of God’s

(Nature’s) Law.

The point? The legal law can only control us if we can be made to voluntarily, continuously harm and injure one another through legal (man-made) methods of false law. To injure, in legalism, means to bring someone or something IN to and therefore under the legal LAW (_jure_) by means of invoking it in commerce (contract), or in other words by causing all actions of men to be done through a government assigned, artificial, legal persona (mask) — men acting not in Nature (under God and Its Higher Law) but instead in legal (artificial) persona, a false “strawman” that is property of the commercialized corporation of government. We tolerate harm in every way, to each other and to ourselves, as if it’s a normal, or even natural part of “life” as citizenships (debt-slaves). We are acting as commercial vessels, and therefore, as feudal vassals. VASSAL – _noun_ – 1: A PERSON UNDER THE PROTECTION OF A FEUDAL LORD to whom he has vowed homage and fealty: A FEUDAL TENANT. 2: ONE IN A SUBSERVIENT OR SUBORDINATE POSITION. _(–Webster’s Dictionary

Online, current)_

—=—

Maxim of law: _With protection comes subjection (subservience/subordination)._ In other words, by doing all things commercially in a false, legal persona (status, which is property of government), all actions done by national “citizens” are considered as being legally protected under international law, and, as the maxim of law goes, _with protection comes subjection._ You see, this maxim applies to both men and the persons (legal status) men pretend to act within, which inversely means that to have the protection of God (Natural rights), one must subject oneself only to the Law of Nature (God), never to what is legal (anti-God, anti-Nature). And so, having legal protection as “consumers” in commerce requires voluntary personhood (legal existence/status) and subjection to the false gods (magistrates) of government. The concept is not at all different, metaphorically speaking, as being either an angel or a demon. Both answer to their perspective gods and are bound by the law thereof. The personification of the angel guides men towards the Law of Nature while the demon (devil) drives men towards the big lie, the artificial aspect of false existence (citizenship in personhood) separated from Nature (God) and Its Law. The angel exists only in Nature (Reality) and may only influence and guide men towards Nature (God) and Its Law. But the demon exists only in fiction, in legal commerce, unable to do anything to men in Nature nor effect the Natural (God-given) rights of men (to do no harm) unless men can be deceived and tricked into entering into the legal, artificial realm (hell) via commercial contract, including citizenship to the legalist, secular nations. Nature (God) is Truth. Legalism is always a lie. One cannot have two opposing gods (masters), nor can one practice two opposing laws. One cannot claim the Natural rights emanating from Nature (God) while acting in an unnatural state of false existence (persona) and following only the law governing fiction. One cannot follow the Law of Nature (God) while also following its complete, intentional opposite, the law of men (legalism). And while the True intent of the concept of possessing the Natural (God-given) right of freedom of religion only exists in Nature, under God (as the practice only of the Law of Nature and exemption from legal, manmade sanctions), legalism only exists outside of and without God, without the Law of Nature. Legal law is a pretended exemption from the Law and Laws of Nature (God). It is really just satanism in disguise, for the meaning of the word satan is merely that which is adversarial to God (Nature/Truth) and Its Law. In legalism, the legal terminology (trickery) “freedom of religion” actually means freedom from religion, or in other words, freedom from Nature (God) and Its Law. All legal, commercial law necessarily defies, opposes, and abandons what is Nature (God) and Its Law, for all legal persons, places, and things (nouns/names) are false. In Nature, all of Existence (Creation) is anonymous, nameless, and therefore carries no mark, no blemish, and no sign of legal _property_. Nothing in Nature is property of man. Only legal (artificial) persons, places, and things (names placed upon Reality) are property (creations of) men. And so, when the Law of Nature is transmuted, reconstituted, and thus perverted from Nature (God) into commercial (legal) code, and when men can be tricked into following this artificial code instead of the actual Law of Existence (God), then men carry the delusion that all of Nature, including themselves, are property of some commercial government corporation. Every tree, plant, animal, element, and living creature has been blemished with a legal name (noun/”thing”). Every geographical area of Nature (God) has been bestowed a legal name (noun) designating it a “place” or jurisdiction. And every man has been given an additional name (noun) and other marks that identify us all as some form of legal persona (noun/name). Therefore, through this word-trickery or word-majick of the legal language, all parts of Nature have been claimed as the property of mans creations, of artificial persons (corporations) created by the governments of men.

—=—

“THE GREAT ENEMY OF THE TRUTH IS VERY OFTEN NOT THE LIE – DELIBERATE, CONTRIVED AND DISHONEST – BUT THE MYTH, PERSISTENT, PERSUASIVE, AND UNREALISTIC. BELIEF IN MYTHS ALLOWS THE COMFORT OF OPINION WITHOUT THE DISCOMFORT OF THOUGHT.” _–John F. Kennedy_

—=—

We have allowed hell on Earth to come into existence, and we follow its pretenders, its false gods (magistrates) and legal codes as its vassals in an open-air debtors prison. And we have been so far separated from our own Nature (God) by this mythos that even the idea of self-governing under the Law of God by claiming what is inherently ours, that is, our only actual God-given (Natural) right that is to do no harm, no longer exists as even a possibility, for to exist in and under the artifice of nations and legal law we must therefore cause continuous harm to one another. To get ahead one must, either unwittingly or with deceitful understanding, harm all others. To make money (mammon) one must charge usury and act in grocery (harm/evil). And to have wealth as “property” (in mammon) one must act according to the dictates of lust, of greed, and of purposeful antagonism toward the Law and Laws of Nature (God). Citizenship, by its artificial nature, is the seven deadly sins all tied up in one corporate employment to “the state.” And that’s just what it is: employment. A citizenship is an employee of its government, an agent to its principal. And an employee has no choice. An employee must act the part he or she is playing. A citizenship of a nation (corporation) has no right and no authority to act under Gods (Nature’s) Law. Moral choice is against the legal law. Not moral thought, only the right to act on that moral thought is taken away. Let’s face it… the continuity of government depends solely on men not acting upon their moral conscious against it. And this is the very purpose behind the multitude of false religions married (incorporated) under the legal state – belief without acting on that belief. In other words, hypocrisy (simulation) at its worst. It is the element of choice that Truly validates ones actions. Legalism takes away choice, and often forces us to do the opposite of what we would otherwise choose to do. _Choice is an illusion_ while we are plugged-in to _The Matrix_ (legal simulation). The following cannot be feigned or forced by legal sanction. They must come from the soul. They must come from the conscious mind of men, not as a bylaw of a corporation through fictional persons in simulation. For these are “family values” not corporate rules. Lust is defeated by self-control, that is, self-government, chastity. Gluttony is defeated by temperance, in serving others before

ourselves.

Greed is cured by charity in all things, by putting the needs of others before ourselves. Sloth is ceased when one has zeal, a zest and respect for all life, and diligence toward the needs of others. Wrath, as anger toward another, is defeated by patience, by empathetic understanding of the disposition of others. Envy has no place when the desire to help others succeed is more powerful than the desire to defeat, compete, or otherwise supersede

them.

And pride can hold no man’s ego when one stands always in perspective humility, instead standing always in the attitude of service to all men and all True Existence (Nature/God). The legal person is all of these in one, by legal requirement and/or as a result of the legal code, causing lustful and self-serving (glutinous) behavior, creating greed as intention and sloth as consequence, where lawyers capitalize and promote wrathful thought for profit and gain, playing perfectly into the resultant envy promoted by entertainment, advertising, and educational institutions, all packaged up in a fervent, national pride that necessarily excludes all others in the world not of the same pretended ethnicity (nationality). Personhood is legalized sin. Personhood is spiritual death. The poker player would never follow these self-evident Laws of Nature (God), and neither can the citizenship of the nations of mammon. To succeed in mammon, all of these must be put aside to make room for evil intent, coveting after the false god of money. Aristotle, who apparently penned the _NICOMACHEAN ETHICS_, expounds on what is the nature of actions in volunteerism, what is involuntary, and what he calls the non-voluntary aspects of the dualistic nature of these behaviors, which generally reflect the Law of Nature (God) as virtue (need) and the legal, commercial drive as the excess (desire/want) and/or deficiency that is expressed by a lack thereof in each virtue. Listed below, the “mean” category signifies a natural, reasonable balance between the excess and the deficiency. Of course, the legal system as commerce seeks to exploit the excess and the deficiency of moral character, just as one would expect from the demons of legalism, of those who seek to gain and promote the purely secular, legal ideal and lifestyle of their own version of “freedom of religion,” legally meaning freedom from the Law of God (Nature), legally licensed freedom from personal responsibility towards other men and from self-government (self-control under the moral Law). What is a legal version is never the same and always opposed to that which it simulates in hypocrisy. Here I have listed these ethical principles along with the _Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language_ definition of each term, which also reflects the same moral ethic in Biblical terms. When reading these, it must be from the perspective that each extreme represents the two trays of a scale, whereupon that scale tips in the favor of spirituality under God (the Law of Nature) and its opposing force of secularism under legalism (fallacious logic as the law of men). Yet too much of even the spiritually minded concept may cause men to act just as foolishly as the secularist extreme of that scale. It is balance we seek, not perfection. And this balance is self-governance under God’s Law (of Nature).  However, do not be fooled by the notion that legalism offers a counter-balance to perfection. That is not its design. Its design is to tip the scale in only one direction at all times, while simulating a religious foundation of moral equivalence and manifest destiny. This is a lie told by the king of lies, by men seeking power through the destruction of your ability to self-govern, and by taking you away from God (Nature) through false denominations (empty names) of the false doctrines of corporate religion. In other words, legalism is designed to keep you at all times spiritually unbalanced. All of these expressive traits, again, are based on choice. Legalism offers no choice, while the Law of God relies only on your choice to follow It or turn away from it towards the artificial construct of a legalistic lifestyle in spiritual death.

–=–

COURAGE – _noun_ – Bravery; intrepidity; that quality of mind which enables men to encounter danger and difficulties with firmness, or without fear or depression of spirits; valor; boldness; resolution. It is a constituent part of fortitude; but fortitude implies patience to bear continued suffering. Courage that grows from constitution, often forsakes a man when he has occasion for it; _courage_ which arises from a sense of duty, acts in a uniform manner. Be strong and of good _courage_

Deuteronomy 31:6

.

(_Websters1828)_

CONCERNED WITH

MEAN

EXCESS

DEFICIENCY

fear (_phobos_)

COURAGE (_andreia_): mean in fear and confidence FIRST TYPE. Foolhardy or excessive fearlessness; is one who over indulges in fearful activities. COWARDLY (_deilos_): exceeds in fear and is deficient in confidence confidence (_thrasos_) SECOND TYPE. Rash (_thrasus_): exceeds in confidence

–=–

TEMPERANCE – _noun_ –  1. Moderation; particularly, habitual moderation in regard to the indulgence of the natural appetites and passions; restrained or moderate indulgence; as _temperance_ in eating and drinking; _temperance_ in the indulgence of joy or mirth. _Temperance_ in eating and drinking is opposed to gluttony and drunkenness, and in other indulgences, to excess. 2. Patience; calmness; sedateness; moderation of passion. He calm’d his wrath with goodly _temperance._

_(Websters1828)_

CONCERNED WITH

MEAN

EXCESS

DEFICIENCY

pleasure (_hēdonē_)

and pain (_lupē_)

TEMPERANCE (_sōphrosunē_) Profligacy, dissipation, etc. (_akolasia_) scarcely occurs, but we may call it Insensible (_including_ a _lack of empathy, happiness from doing harm_)(_anaisthētos_)

–=–

LIBERALITY – _noun_ –  1. Munificence; bounty. That _liberality_ is but cast away, which makes us borrow what we cannot pay. 2. A particular act of generosity; a donation; a gratuity. In this sense, it has the plural number. A prudent man is not impoverished by his liberalities. 3. Largeness of mind; catholicism (_universalism_); that comprehensiveness of mind which includes other interests beside its own, and duly estimates in its decisions the value or importance of each. It is evidence of a noble mind to judge of men and things with _liberality. _Many treat the gospel with indifference under the name of _liberality. _4. Candor; impartiality. _(Websters1828)_

CONCERNED WITH

MEAN

EXCESS

DEFICIENCY

giving and getting (smaller amounts of) money LIBERALITY (Rackham), GENEROSITY (Sachs) (_eleutheriotēs_) prodigality (Rackham), wastefulness (Sachs) (_asōtia_) meanness (Rackham), stinginess (Sachs) (_aneleutheria_)

–=–

MAGNIFICENCE – _noun_ – Grandeur of appearance; greatness and splendor of show or state; as the _magnificence_ of a palace or of a procession; the _magnificence_ of a Roman triumph. _(Websters1828)_

CONCERNED WITH

MEAN

EXCESS

DEFICIENCY

giving and getting greater things MAGNIFICENCE (_megaloprepeia_) Tastelessness (_apeirokalia_) or Vulgarity (_banausia_) Paltriness (Rackham), Chintziness (Sachs) (_mikroprepeia_)

–=–

MAGNANIM’ITY – _noun_ – Greatness of mind; that elevation or dignity of soul, which encounters danger and trouble with tranquillity and firmness, which raises the possessor above revenge, and makes him delight in acts of benevolence, which makes him disdain injustice and meanness, and prompts him to sacrifice personal ease, interest and safety for the accomplishment of useful and noble objects.

_(Websters1828)_

CONCERNED WITH

MEAN

EXCESS

DEFICIENCY

great honor (_timē_) and dishonor GREATNESS OF SOUL (_megalopsuchia_) (Traditional translation “magnanimity”. Sometimes “pride”.) Vanity (_chaunotēs_) Smallness of Soul (_self-hatred_)(_mikropsuchia_)

–=–

AMBITION – _noun_ –  A desire of preferment, or of honor; a desire of excellence or superiority. It is used in a good sense; as, emulation may spring from a laudable _ambition._ It denotes also an inordinate desire of power, or eminence, often accompanied with illegal means to obtain the object. It is sometimes followed by of; as, a man has an _ambition_ of wit. Milton has used the word in the Latin sense of going about, or attempting; but this sense is hardly legitimate. _(Websters1828)_

CONCERNED WITH

MEAN

EXCESS

DEFICIENCY

lesser honor (_timē_) and dishonor no special term in ancient Greek for the right amount of ambition Over-ambitiousness) (_philotimos_) lack of ambition (_aphilotimos_)

–=–

GENTLENESS – _noun_ – Dignity of birth.  1. Genteel behavior. 2. Softness of manners; mildness of temper; sweetness of disposition; meekness. The fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, long suffering, _gentleness_goodness, faith. Galatians 5:22

. 3.

Kindness; benevolence. 4. Tenderness; mild treatment.

_(Websters1828)_

CONCERNED WITH

MEAN

EXCESS

DEFICIENCY

anger (_orgē_)

GENTLENESS (_praotēs_) Irascibility (Rackham), Irritability (Sachs) (_orgilotēs_) Spiritlessness (_aorgẽsia_)

–=–

FRIENDLINESS – _noun_ – 1. A disposition to friendship; friendly disposition. 2. Exertion of benevolence or kindness. _(Websters1828)_

CONCERNED WITH

MEAN

EXCESS

DEFICIENCY

general pleasantness in life FRIENDLINESS (_something like philia_) FIRST TYPE. obsequious (_areskos_), if for no purpose quarrelsome (_duseris_) and surly (_duskolos_) (_contrarian_) SECOND TYPE. flatterer (_kolax_), if for own advantage

–=–

TRUTHFUL – _ADJECTIVE_ – Full of truth. _(Websters1828)_ TRUTH – _noun – _1. Conformity to fact or reality; exact accordance with that which is, or has been, or shall be. The _truth_ of history constitutes its whole value. We rely on the _truth_ of the scriptural prophecies. My mouth shall speak _truth._ Proverbs 8:7

. Sanctify them

through thy truth; thy word is _truth._ John 17:17

. 2. True state

of facts or things. The duty of a court of justice is to discover the _truth._ Witnesses are sworn to declare the _truth_ the whole _truth_ and nothing but the _truth _3. Conformity of words to thoughts, which is called moral _truth. _Shall _truth_ fail to keep her word? 4. Veracity; purity from falsehood; practice of speaking truth; habitual disposition to speak truth; as when we say, a man is a man of _truth. _5. Correct opinion. 6. Fidelity; constancy. The thoughts of past pleasure and _truth. _7. Honesty; virtue. It must appear, That malice bears down _truth. _8. Exactness; conformity to rule. Plows, to go true, depend much on the _truth_ of the iron work. 9. Real fact of just principle; real state of things. There are innumerable truths with which we are not acquainted. 10. Sincerity… 13. It is sometimes used by way of concession… That is, it is a truth; what you have said, I admit to be true. In _truth_ in reality; in fact. Of a _truth_ in reality; certainly. To do _truth_ is to practice what God commands. John 3. _(Websters1828)_

CONCERNED WITH

MEAN

EXCESS

DEFICIENCY

truth (_alēthēs_)

TRUTHFULNESS (_alētheia_) Boastfulness: pretense as exaggeration (_alazoneia_) Self-deprecation: pretense as understatement (_eironia_, same word

as “irony “)

–=–

WITTY – _adjective_ –  1. Possessed of wit; full of wit; as a _witty_ poet. 2. Judicious; ingenious; inventive. 3. Sarcastic; full of taunts. _(Websters1828)_ WIT – _verb intransitive_ – To know. This verb is used only in the infinitive, to _wit_ namely, that is to say. – _noun_  1. Primarily, the intellect; the understanding or mental powers. Will puts in practice what the _wit_ deviseth. For _wit_ and power their last endeavors bend to outshine each other. 2. The association of ideas in a manner natural, but unusual and striking, so as to produce surprise joined with pleasure. _wit_ is defined. What oft was thought, but neer so well expressed. WIT consists in assembling and putting together with quickness, ideas in which can be found resemblance and congruity, by which to make up pleasant pictures and agreeable visions in the fancy. WIT consists chiefly in joining things by distant and fanciful relations, which surprise us because they are unexpected. WIT is a propriety of thoughts and words; or in other terms, thoughts and words elegantly adapted to the subject. 3. The faculty of associating ideas in a new and unexpected manner. 4. A man of genius; as, the age of Addison abounded with wits. A _wit_ herself, Amelia weds a _wit. _5. A man of fancy or _wit. _Intemperate wits will spare neither friend nor foe. 6. Sense; judgment. He wants not _wit_ the danger to decline. 7. Faculty of the mind. 8. Wits, in the plural, soundness of mind; intellect not disordered; sound mind. No man in his wits would venture on such an expedition. Have you lost your wits? Is he out of his wits? 9. Power of invention; contrivance; ingenuity. He was at his wits end.

_(Websters1828)_

CHARMING – _participle present tense_ – 1. Using charms; enchanting. 2. _adjective_ – Pleasing in the highest degree; delighting. Music is but an elegant and _charming_ species of elocution. _(Websters1828)_ CHARM – _noun – _1. Words, characters or other things imagined to possess some occult or unintelligible power; hence, a magic power or spell, by which with the supposed assistance of the devil, witches and sorcerers have been supposed to do wonderful things. Spell; enchantment. Hence, 2. That which has power to subdue opposition, and gain the affections; that which can please irresistible; that which delights and attracts the heart; generally in the plural. The smiles of nature and the charms of art. Good humor only teaches charms to last. – _verb transitive – _1. To subdue or control by incantation or secret influence. I will send serpents among you – which will not be charmed. Jeremiah 8:17

. 2. To subdue

by secret power, especially by that which pleases and delights the mind; to allay, or appease. Music the fiercest grief can _charm. _3. To give exquisite pleasure to the mind or senses; to delight. We were charmed with the conversation. The aerial songster charms us with her melodious notes. 4. To fortify with charms against evil. I have a charmed life, which must not yield. 5. To make powerful by charms. 6. To summon by incantation. 7. To temper agreeably. – _verb intransitive_ – To sound harmonically. _(Websters1828)_

CONCERNED WITH

MEAN

EXCESS

DEFICIENCY

pleasantness and social amusement

WITTINESS (Rackham)

CHARMING (Sachs) (_eutrapelos_) Buffoonery (_bõmolochia_) Boorishness (_bõmolochos_)

–=–

For further outline and elaboration of these ten books containing these virtues and their excess or deficiency from neutrality (middle, mean, balanced state), see the wiki article, here: LINK–> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicomachean_Ethics

–=–

It is easy to confuse these terms with their legal opposites, word magic that is designed to simulate the form without the substance, to pretend good while acting badly. As an example, the legal system bestows the legal (false), flattering title of “honor” upon politicians and judges, as well as titles of supposed (pretended) nobility. One need not do anything special to be granted the flattering title of nobility, one may simply be born into it. Or, one may be hired on to the government corporations and be given such a legal title, which is a specifically defined term of art that has nothing to do with acting in honor in any way. This simulation (hypocrisy) is the nature of _The Matrix _story and movie franchise — a society so enamored in false, flattering titles that not one of us acts according to the title we pretend to bear. For while the words _simulation_ and _hypocrisy_ bear (carry) the same meaning, they are the products of very different intents. Hypocrisy is committed by a man that knows the Law of God (Nature) and continues knowingly and thus consciously to break that Law. But society today is in simulation, not hypocrisy. Simulation is committed by a man that does not know the Law of God except by name (form without substance), confused by legalism and false doctrine of state-sponsored religions, and therefore acts unknowingly and unconsciously to break the Law of

God (Nature).

Which is worse? Why hypocrisy, of course, knowingly breaking the Law

of Nature (God).

Which is more destructive? That would be simulation, for a simulator knows and acknowledges not his own hypocrisy, being inculturated and brainwashed by secular logic (legalism) and thus tricked into contract with the devils (attorneys/agents) of government – injured (brought into legal law) and submitted to a spiritually dead existence absent from Source (Nature). One that is ignorant, though this be no excuse, cannot be called a hypocrite. But he can be called evil, pernicious, and wanting of moral rectitude, as much as any farm animal might be labeled. For both exist in their own matrix simulation, an existence completely separate from Nature (Reality). One thing, however, is certainly clear… The ignorant simulators must be governed, for they cannot govern themselves if they do not know the Law of Nature (God). Trying to self-govern without God, without Logos (Christ, the Word of God personified), is like entering into a battle without a sword or shield. The piercing effect of legalism and mammon corrupts the empty mind, the mind devoid of knowledge. And we are certainly a people destroyed by our disgusting and purposeful lack of knowledge, our

active ignorance.

_(Author’s note: I just revealed the subject outline of my next

book.)_

It must be said that not any one of these virtues listed above can be obtained without the others. Each is like a check and balance upon which the others depend. For instance, one might be very witty and yet, without empathy, that is, without having temperance over ones words or actions, ones wit will certainly do harm to another or to oneself (self-deprecation). This dispensation of virtue is akin to having a shield against those seven deadly sins that the legal system thrives upon and invokes in each of us through its artificial matrix code. And so the worst of men rise to the top while the best of us are cowed and prevented from practicing this religious Law of virtuous ethics as religious men (non-persons). To be clear, the Law of Nature (God) is illegal in the legal system of men, for that is the purpose of having freedom from (of) religion, which means a state of possessing legal freedom from moral Law. Following the Law of God religiously is not a religion, it is conscious action and a fear of hypocrisy. The religions of men in no way require any man to follow the Law of God, and in fact require every man to break with God’s Law, the Law of Nature, in order to join and follow whatever false doctrine that “church” has printed, incorporated, and made legal (anti-God). Religion is steeped in and dependent on simulation and hypocrisy, for all its members and clergy must necessarily fall into one of these categories. It is no irony that by doing no harm one therefore rises above and takes away all power of the legal governments of men, leaving the dealer (government) of the game without dependent, morally corrupted customers, without support, without players (citizen employees) in its organized, extortive, commercial business practices. A king, a government, and a poker dealer (tax collector) are useless and powerless actors without the multitude of weak-minded men paying them tribute by participating in their legal, permissive, monopolistic games so as to be harmful and be harmed as a defunct (spiritually dead), default lifestyle. Therefore, the legal system and its devilish law allows for, protects, and very much promotes injury and harm. To _injure_ literally means to bring someone, some place, or some thing into law, and this usually means harm must be done to that legal (artificial) person (status), place (corporation), or thing (property). Though these are merely fictions of law (nouns/names), these pretended titles play an intricate role in this process, for they are all patented creations and property of government. _The creator controls_, as their well-established, ancient, legal maxim of law dictates. In other words, God controls Nature (including man) and Its Law, while governments control fiction (including the legal persons, places, and things of men) and the legal law that controls them. Through the fictional person, the man is controlled. Within the fictional place (legal jurisdiction of a municipal corporation) the person is governed (administrated). And through every false, legal claim of any thing as “property” by the fictional legal person in the fictional legal place, the man is therefore claiming that he or she holds “title” through some creation (persona) of government, and therefore the law of persons, places, and things is the highest – a false law held higher than Nature’s (God’s) Law. Ultimately this means that anyone that violates or trespasses upon that lie of fictionally entitled property must be punished, that is, harmed through extortion and pain. Forgiveness is not tolerated by we that justify, tolerate, and even worship patriotically this legal system, pretending God’s realm of Nature no longer exists when covered by a fictional, legal “property” line (artificial border) — that the Law of God’s Nature is equally defeated within that artificial boundary of legalism. Therefore, no moral action will be tolerated from any man because it’s illegal (intolerable) for a man bearing (using) a legal person (legal status) under and controlled (owned) by government to practice any form of True religious freedom (bound under moral, unwritten Law). What is legally written remains instead the foundational lie in which we trust. A person (legal status) exists only in the legal fiction system (a fictional simulation created through legal code words), no differently than a _Monopoly_ game game-piece only has power and status in the _Monopoly_ game or a pawn or knight only has status as a pawn in the game of chess, being a useless trinket in Truth, that is, in Nature (under God), and having power only through the permissive (licensed) fiction that is man’s legal system of law. And so a man acting as/in legal persona (false character) can only act according to the law of persons, the law of the legal, commercial game, never the spiritual, moral Law of Nature (God). In other words, a man must tolerate everything that the government’s legal system of law requires its fictional persons (property) to tolerate, while inversely showing forced, equal, collective intolerance towards whatever government requires and considers as legally intolerable. Morals, values, spirituality, and just outright common sense are intolerable in any legal system. Why? Because these actions (not just thoughts) cannot be governed through legal means, only suppressed through rules attached to this persona (status in society). Only harm can be legally governed. And like a parasite, a vampiric ghoul, government capitalizes upon and taxes every instance of harm we do to one another, even going so far as to fill our heads with Hollywood (deceitful) entertainment that constantly promotes and features as “reality television” a host of paid, low-level, professional liars (actors) fulfilling quite scripted acts of competition and harm. This is no game, this is the way of Nature (Jehovah). This is our actual default. Only the legal fiction prevents us from living Truly amongst one another in Love and Charity. And that fiction was created purposefully to destroy our spiritual release, our ability to Love and cherish each other as Real men, as Creations of God (Nature), entraining, educating, and tricking us into playing instead their legal game of monopolies (nations) by their artifices and false laws. If this still doesn’t make sense, try and imagine a moral Monopoly or chess game for a moment, where the Highest rule of the game is to do no harm to any other player (man) or to the earth (Nature), where all “places” are only property of God and no other. Imagine playing Monopoly without money, without a banker (false god). Imagine if the dice had no power to move you and force you to harm (trespass) because you had no fictional character that, by the artificial (legal/man-made) law of that game, could control you through contract, bond, violence, and surety. Imagine having the Natural right and ability to travel through each pretended square of land because no legal system prevented it, and because the Law of the game is to do no harm, to forgive us our trespasses, and to love and respect one another as our neighbor and as we would expect to have done to ourselves? While this is the default Law of Nature, or in other words, what exists without the artifices of legal properties (persons, places, and things), it is only possible by conscious application (choice). It is only possible without temptation towards mammon (money and false valuation of what is Real as a fiction/name in commerce). It is only possible by men able to govern their own minds and actions, by men that hold the Highest Law not merely as a pretended belief system (religion) under a false corporate title like “Christian,” but as a lifestyle put into action at every moment of every new day. What games would we play if there was no competition? What wonders could we accomplish? What level of True Love could we experience? Unfortunately, these questions cannot be answered while men are contracted with the dis-ease of legal personhood (status) under a false law, while inside the simulation of the legal matrix code and while entranced by the artifice of false, legally incorporated religions (belief without action). For the member of any religion is merely a citizen thereof, no different than that of a citizen of any nation, unable to ever act upon any moral law purveyed within that religion because that religion is a legal corporation bound wholly under legal law (IRS code), and the man attending that religious ceremony (game) is a legal citizen under legal (anti-God, anti-Nature) law. He that pretends, acts, and preaches falsely has no place in God’s Nature (Creation). The chess piece has no power except upon the chess board. The cartoon only exists in the cartoon realm. One cannot be a follower of the Law of God (exemplified in the story of Jesus Christ, the Law personified) and also pretend to be a legal person bound under legal law (false, antichrist doctrine). Each religion is a Monopoly board of its own, allowing empty belief in idols but preventing the ability of men to practice any moral actions as Law without license and permission from government. This false charity from religions can only serve to keep the poor in poverty, to fill the neglected belly of the hungry temporarily, without satisfaction, and provide only the illusion of shelter and love not as a duty to God, but as a gesture of empty, corporate greed (lust). Any welfare system provided by the corporate church serves only to support poverty, hunger, and homelessness, no less than the welfare system of the legal, corporate state serves only the continued base poverty level of its recipients. For money-based, corporate charity bound in anti-God legalism can never cure the ills of a society that worships and hoards the empty promise of money as its artificial god. Government is only words on paper, and these words (false laws) are used by actors (politicians, police, etc.) in artificially flattering titles as justification to harm and injure the men who respect and therefore tolerate them as if their titles and legally licensed powers thereof are part of reality. This invisible badge of moral corruption, a public _scarlet letter_ of moral incorrigibility called personhood (legalized adultery) and national US citizenship is expressed every time that status (legal, artificial persona) is invoked through identity (pretended sameness as a fictional character/name), such as showing a driver’s license or using a social security number. The law applies only to the person (fictional status), but the man acting in person is in a permanent state of injury (bound under legal law and sanction) by continued, assumed, permanent use (expression) of that persona (status) and the protection it tacitly imposes, being in bond and surety as a consequence of using another’s (government’s) property. Legal protectionism, that is, giving up liberty for security, replacing the choice of self-government with a legalistic prison in debt, is never a good thing. And now, suddenly, the purpose of Thomas Jefferson’s quote above can be clearly understood. Your rulers use the premise of this quote against you, by causing you to abandon your natural (“God-given”) rights in exchange for their contracted dis-ease of legal, artificial rights. The devil (evil genius/attorneys) can only effect you when you get into contract with it. Legalism is intolerable to innocence. Satan requires harm be done so that its anti-God legalist law may govern and administrate that harm. With time or with money (which are the same thing), we all pay in the end. Governments only have power over men that are weak-minded, ignorant, and warlike, men that cannot govern themselves, men that deny their own power and existence under God (in Nature/Reality). This unnatural state of being is purely a learned, societal behavior fomented on the “public” at large, for one cannot control (govern) he that is self-governing, unless that government first steals that man’s spiritual release and ability to practice any form of moral (unwritten, self-evident) Law. This is the absolute power behind the legal systems of men, a distinct lack of recognition and respect of the Law of Nature, the Law of God, and therefore the “God-given Rights” so often spoken about by the men that create governments. However, while they are happy to reserve these rights for themselves, the rest of us must be made to deny them and harm each other as a customary, common (vulgar) lifestyle in order that we may be ruled by the legalistic (man-made) rules of harm. We thrive on injury, because only through injury may we invoke and utilize the legal system. Without harm, it has no purpose. It cannot exist in a charitable society. It cannot thrive when forgiveness is the law. And it cannot control us unless we treat each other without love, as if we are not each other’s neighbors to love as we love ourselves. When our actions are no longer answerable only to Jehovah but to men pretending to be gods (magistrates/judges), then we no longer have Natural (God-given) rights. The second we invoke the legal system and law of men, we abandon all that is of God (Nature, the Universe), all that is the benefit of living in and speaking at all times the Truth. For God is Truth and the keeper of It. In other words, if we act like Lawless (soulless) animals then we shall be treated like Lawless (soulless)

animals.

Governments, however, are not Truth. Governments exist and subsist solely on lies, on their own fictional inventions, and according to their own law. We seem to forget that every government in existence is immune from its own system of law, standing in the legal title of self-proclaimed, artificial, pretended sovereignty over its own property, its own false creation, including the persons (status in society) we pretend to be. We are told that we are each individually sovereign and yet also somehow subject to government, a blatant misnomer bordering on paradox. A man of God has only one Sovereign and it is never himself, for to have Natural (God-given) rights is to recognize Nature, that is the Universe as all True and self-evident Existence as a whole, as man’s only God (Sovereign). Nature is the only Truth. Truth is God. God is Truth. All else is manmade, and what is manmade is never Truth, never part of God, never part of or governed by Nature and Its Law. Therefore, what is manmade, including what we call persons or citizenship, is a lie. A lie is always against Truth. A lie is always against God’s Law. Lies are never part of Nature, thus never part of God. In other words, Truth is self-evident, and so Truth is the keeper of Itself, for Truth is the Nature and Law of the Universe (Jehovah). Man is part of Nature (God), part of Truth, and ultimately governed by Truth (Nature and Its Law), and so nothing manmade can be said to be part of God, for nothing manmade is part of (originated from) Nature (the Source of Truth). This is the essential foundation of law. Words are never Truth, only form without substance and without self-evidence. The Word of God is the Law of Truth, the Law (Logos) is the Son of God (Truth). The _Word_ is the _Law_ is the _Son_… these words carry the same meaning and Source. Whenever Truth is spoken, this is the Word of God. That which emanates Truth is acting in or speaking the Word of God, and is acting as a son of God, for God (Jehovah) is Truth. And one can self-evidently only have one True Origin, one Source, one Sovereign (God). All others are false (respected lies). This understanding does not require a degree, or even an education. It needs no religion or money-hungry, lust-addicted priest. It is a fundamental, self-evident Truth. It is the foundation of all Law, for the legal law only exists as that which is opposed to Truth. Life is spiritual Truth. Legal fiction is spiritual death. All persons (legal status under government) are fictions of law. All persons are dead. Persons are not of God, not Created from Nature (Universal Source). Persons are words, form without substance. Persons

are Soulless…

If you think this is religion, you are hopelessly lost in the throws of legally imposed, active ignorance… dazed, and confused by the firm and fast grip of your lovelorn lips upon the teat of the false, legal gods of government (mammon).

—=—

“THERE IS NOTHING MORE FRIGHTENING THAN ACTIVE IGNORANCE.” _—Johann Wolfgang von Goethe_

—=—

“WE CAN EASILY FORGIVE A CHILD WHO IS AFRAID OF THE DARK; THE REAL TRAGEDY OF LIFE IS WHEN MEN ARE AFRAID OF THE LIGHT.”

_―Plato_

—=—

“THERE IS A CULT OF IGNORANCE IN THE UNITED STATES, AND THERE HAS ALWAYS BEEN. THE STRAIN OF ANTI-INTELLECTUALISM HAS BEEN A CONSTANT THREAD WINDING ITS WAY THROUGH OUR POLITICAL AND CULTURAL LIFE, NURTURED BY THE FALSE NOTION THAT DEMOCRACY MEANS THAT ‘MY IGNORANCE IS JUST AS GOOD AS YOUR KNOWLEDGE.”

_―Issac Asimov _

—=—

“THERE ARE TWO WAYS TO BE FOOLED. ONE IS TO BELIEVE WHAT ISN’T TRUE; THE OTHER IS TO REFUSE TO BELIEVE WHAT IS TRUE.” _―Soren Kierkegaard_

—=—

“WE ARE ALL BORN IGNORANT, BUT ONE MUST WORK HARD TO REMAIN

STUPID.”

_―Benjamin Franklin_

—=—

“THE HARDEST THING TO EXPLAIN IS THE GLARINGLY EVIDENT WHICH EVERYBODY HAS DECIDED NOT TO SEE.” _―Ayn Rand, The Fountainhead

_

—=—

“FIVE PERCENT OF THE PEOPLE THINK; TEN PERCENT OF THE PEOPLE THINK THEY THINK; AND THE OTHER EIGHTY-FIVE PERCENT WOULD RATHER DIE THAN THINK.” _―Thomas A. Edison_

—=—

“BUT YOU CAN’T MAKE PEOPLE LISTEN. THEY HAVE TO COME ROUND IN THEIR OWN TIME, WONDERING WHAT HAPPENED AND WHY THE WORLD BLEW UP AROUND THEM…” _―Ray Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451

_

—=—

“BEING IGNORANT IS NOT SO MUCH A SHAME, AS BEING UNWILLING TO

LEARN.”

_―Benjamin Franklin_

—=—

“AN AGE IS CALLED DARK, NOT BECAUSE THE LIGHT FAILS TO SHINE, BUT BECAUSE PEOPLE REFUSE TO SEE IT.” _―James A. Michener_

—=—

“TO SURRENDER TO IGNORANCE AND CALL IT GOD HAS ALWAYS BEEN PREMATURE, AND IT REMAINS PREMATURE TODAY. FAITH IS THE GREAT COP-OUT, THE GREAT EXCUSE TO EVADE THE NEED TO THINK AND EVALUATE EVIDENCE. FAITH IS THE BELIEF IN SPITE OF, EVEN PERHAPS BECAUSE OF, THE LACK OF

EVIDENCE.”

_―Richard Dawkins_ _(Author’s Note: I do not adhere to Dawkins gibberish, and would give my left nut to “debate” him, that is, educate him and his hopeless cult-following on his fallacious rhetoric and active ignorance of the Bible story and purpose. But a Truth as this, spoken by any man, cannot be ignored lest one becomes ones own enemy. His words regard only empty, corporate religions and their flatteringly-titled followers, not the self-evidence of the Truths in the Bible. His whole pedestal relies on the “strawman argument” fallacy, arguing against the false gods/idolatry and empty images that corporate “Christians” and other religions believe faithfully without proof instead of correcting those false beliefs and instructing them in the Truth of the Bible. In this way, Dawkins is not a Truth-teller but an adversary to the Truth (God). Jehovah (God) is self-evident Truth, against which there is no debating, no versions, and is not to be confused with of defined or likened to false gods and idols. Jehovah is defined as self-Evidence, self-Existence, the Universe, Nature and Its Law, of which we are all undeniably part of in Oneness. The atheist can only exist because false religions exist. The atheist argument is only against some other man’s imagination, not the Bible Law read in proper context and understanding of the intent of its language and metaphor. Dawkins is the “fool” so often referred to therein, just as I was for believing his and other’s fallacious rhetoric instead of reading and committing to due diligence regarding the Bible. His comment above only applies to men tricked into believing the false, manmade doctrines and empty images of denominated, corporate, legalized religions, and has nothing to do with the Bible itself.)_

—=—

Let us be clear that the story of Jesus Christ is a timeless (non-historical) story about the most intolerant dude I can think of, violently overturning the tables of the moneychangers and abhorring all men (fools) that acted and spoke against God’s Law, the Law of Nature, the self-evident Truth. Let us also be clear that Jesus Christ is the story of you, and me, the example of God’s Law, the Law of Nature we are to follow — haters of lies, artifice, and legal fiction, and intolerable to everything not of Truth (Jehovah). No one can possibly read the Bible as Law (doctrine) while at the same time thinking so-called “Christian” thoughts about the _world_ (globalized, institutionalized, unspiritual secularism) around us. Christ tolerated no abhorrent behavior, constantly chastising and slyly convicting all “fools” and “hypocrites” that pretended (simulated), as many of us similarly do today, to be men of God (followers of God’s Law). Nothing in the Bible (Law) promotes tolerance. In fact, the very idea of tolerance is by its nature completely against the purpose of any and every system of law, save perhaps the corrupt legal systems of men that seek socialism, communism, and in general Orwellian despotism. Tolerance is literally moral anarchy, that is, lawlessness to all sense of morality, and poisonous to any sort of spiritually driven values any people may collectively share — the very reason for creating a legitimate (Lawful) government. In other words, once the delusion of enforced, legalized tolerance (permission-based, protected, abhorrent behaviors and lifestyles) infiltrates what otherwise was “constituted” to be an otherwise intolerant society of men that base their participation in that society firstly on a Higher, unwritten, spiritually driven purpose, all hope of maintaining an unwritten, unspoken, unenforced moral order is diminished if not crushed, and such moral behavior is even outlawed by the legalist platform of protectionism (license) for bad behavior.

—=—

“…SHOULDEST THOU HELP THE UNGODLY, AND LOVE THEM THAT HATE THE LORD (JEHOVAH)? THEREFORE _IS_ WRATH UPON THEE FROM BEFORE THE LORD (JEHOVAH)… TAKE HEED WHAT YE DO: FOR YE JUDGE NOT FOR MAN, BUT FOR THE LORD (JEHOVAH), WHO _IS_ WITH YOU IN THE JUDGMENT… FOR _THERE IS_ NO INIQUITY WITH THE LORD OUR GOD, NOR RESPECT OF PERSONS, NOR TAKING OF GIFTS… THUS SHALL YE DO IN THE FEAR OF THE LORD, FAITHFULLY, AND WITH A PERFECT HEART.” _–2 Chronicles 19:2_

—=—

“THE NATURAL (_COMMON/LOWER CLASS_) MAN IS A SPIRITUAL MONSTER. HIS HEART IS WHERE HIS FEET SHOULD BE, FIXED UPON THE EARTH; HIS HEELS ARE LIFTED UP AGAINST HEAVEN, WHICH HIS HEART SHOULD BE SET ON. HIS FACE IS TOWARDS HELL; HIS BACK TOWARDS HEAVEN. HE LOVES WHAT HE SHOULD HATE, AND HATES WHAT HE SHOULD LOVE; JOYS IN WHAT HE OUGHT TO MOURN FOR, AND MOURNS FOR WHAT HE OUGHT TO REJOICE IN; GLORIES IN HIS SHAME, AND IS ASHAMED OF HIS GLORY; ABHORS WHAT HE SHOULD DESIRE, AND DESIRES WHAT HE SHOULD ABHOR.” _—Thomas Boston, quoted from: ‘Augustus Toplady, Complete

Works’_

—=—

To tolerate the existence of evil in men is not the same as tolerating the evils emulated in their behavior. One is to act in charity and love to all men, to tolerate them in their ignorance and deprivation, but never to allow or justify it, and certainly not to love it. The verse above explains that much of the evil of men comes from their status in society, their _person_. The person acts not under God’s Law but under the government (mind control) of a false god (men acting as gods/magistrates). Love the man as God’s Creation, but never the fictional persona (mask) he pretends to be. To legalize tolerance is to make lawful that which is intolerable. To legalize tolerance, that is, to force “citizens” to accept all creeds and lifestyles in false, forced legally sanctioned equality, is to abandon the Source of Law that would otherwise allow good men to fight against that evil. In every case throughout written history, this institutionalized tolerance has but one causal effect — to cause good, moral men to become intolerable to the secularized society created by the enforced tolerance thereof. He that refuses legalized, forced tolerance of that which is immoral must necessarily be labeled as intolerable. It is this phenomenon that we are witnessing in America today, and ultimately in all “first-world” nations around the world. It is this tolerance of evil, this bearing of false love for the deadly sins of men due to their false, legally protected persona, that is the antichrist spirit. One example of this destructive toleration can be seen in what is called as “modern” or “impressionist” art. When the artist no longer paints the world according to its True beauty and wonder, no longer wishing to extend in his art the glory and harshness of Truth, and instead chooses to reinvent Reality (Creation) from his own palate of demented, alternative perspective or some drug-induced “impressionist” revisionism, we have the perfect example of the spiritual degradation that subsists through unrestricted tolerance, and indeed the protective admiration and promotion of tolerable

immorality.

—=—

But it’s the consequences of such universally established tolerance in a legalist, secularized society that are the focus of this short essay. For with such a learned, propagandized, and subsequently violently enforced legalistic tolerance shrouded upon a once morally-driven people, whose spiritual foundation and standing in the Law of Nature (God) against what is otherwise intolerable has ultimately been cowed by such licensure of permissive, illicit behavior and idolatry — this once strong foundation of like-minded people must necessarily become intolerant even toward the expression of their own, natural, moral instinct. We must deny the Truth and accept what is false. Such toxic, societal (legal) tolerance causes immorality in the actions of all men regardless of their upbringing and dissuasiveness from their knowledge and baser instinct, causing a legally-induced, almost helpless automation of the man under the false law of forced permissiveness of all that is against reason, stultifying every “citizen” (employee/agent) into inaction and eventually into a shameful feeling of powerlessness, worthlessness, and helplessness as a normal state of mind. Nineteen Eighty-Four (as Orwell presented) is not merely an inevitable future but a predictive programming of exactly what has incrementally been happening to us, here and now. Good men are afraid to stand up against such oppressive, fallacious public outcries and politically-driven catcalls as “anti-semitic” or “racist,” silenced by social justice campaigns designed to do nothing more than stifle any debate and suppress reasonable consideration. To those acting intolerably, those tolerating evils, their acts of non-toleration through the silencing of any moral opposition is golden. Once tolerance of evil becomes law, only then may evil reign, their actions governed strictly (without choice) by the legalist devils (attorneys) that protect and represent them. And, of course, this is all by design. For the very purpose for this word “racism,” a term and concept that simply cannot be found in older dictionaries or in societal history, is for the purposes of selective intolerance hidden behind the logical fallacy of the goodness of socialistically ingrained, universal tolerance.

—=—

So if all black people get organized as a group of flatteringly titled “black” people (an artificial “black” persona/mask/status), which must necessarily be non-white or any other skin-color, they can then collectively as “black” persons fight racism? But, wait a minute, isn’t that the definition of racism? Wasn’t that the model of America — to create a “white” (pure-blooded) country that enslaved “black” (tainted blood) persons of any skin color? Wasn’t America a bunch of “white” European persons (pure bloodline families) that came together in “solidarity” to form a country that necessarily excluded non-pure-blooded men no matter what

the skin-color?

Is this race denial? Is it race shame? The strange thing is that this manipulative social justice movement has nothing at all to do with ending this left over, eugenically-driven racial hatred, that is, hatred between the so-called races, but rather to promote a hatred of the distinction of race itself, a sort of collective delusion of self-hatred and self-denial. In other words, we are being ingrained and inculturated to consider race (family) itself as intolerable — exactly what one would expect from a United Nations world government that wishes to replace the family unit with globalist, corporate feudalism and the state as _parens patriae_.

—=—

“THE STATE HAS A WIDE RANGE OF POWER FOR LIMITING PARENTAL FREEDOM AND AUTHORITY IN THINGS AFFECTING THE CHILD’S WELFARE… IN FACT, THE ENTIRE FAMILIAL RELATIONSHIP INVOLVES THE STATE.” _“_THE PRIMARY CONTROL AND CUSTODY OF INFANTS IS WITH THE

GOVERNMENT.”

“THERE IS NO WIDER AREA FOR THE EXERCISE OF JUDICIAL DISCRETION THAN THAT OF PROVIDING FOR AND PROTECTING THE BEST INTERESTS OF

CHILDREN.”

“THE COURT STANDS IN THE POSITION OF _PARENS PATRIA_ OF

CHILDREN.”

“_PARENS PATRIAE_,” LITERALLY “PARENT OF THE COUNTRY,” REFERS TRADITIONALLY TO ROLE OF STATE AS SOVEREIGN AND GUARDIAN OF PERSONS UNDER LEGAL DISABILITY.” “PURSUANT TO THE _PARENS PATRIAE_ DOCTRINE, ‘THE PRIMARY CONTROL AND CUSTODY OF INFANTS IS WITH THE GOVERNMENT, TO BE DELEGATED, AS OF COURSE, TO THEIR NATURAL GUARDIANS AND PROTECTORS, SO LONG AS SUCH GUARDIANS ARE SUITABLE PERSONS TO EXERCISE IT.’ ” “IN OTHER WORDS, THE STATE IS THE FATHER AND MOTHER OF THE CHILD AND THE NATURAL PARENTS ARE NOT ENTITLED TO CUSTODY, EXCEPT UPON THE STATE’S BENEFICENT RECOGNITION THAT NATURAL PARENTS PRESUMABLY WILL BE THE BEST OF ITS CITIZENS TO DELEGATE ITS CUSTODIAL POWERS… ‘THE LAW DEVOLVES THE CUSTODY OF INFANT CHILDREN UPON THEIR PARENTS, NOT SO MUCH UPON THE GROUND OF NATURAL RIGHT IN THE LATTER, AS BECAUSE THE INTERESTS OF THE CHILDREN, AND THE GOOD OF THE PUBLIC, WILL, AS A GENERAL RULE, BE THEREBY PROMOTED.’ ” _–Prince, 321 U.S. at 167, 64 S.Ct. at 442, 88 L.Ed. 645. (SOURCE: FindLaw’s Appellate Court of Illinois case and opinions.

)

-and- __MEADOWS v. MEADOWS, (Aug 2008), in the “Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama”?Tillman V. Roberts. 108 So. 62; Ex parte Handley, 460 So.2d 167 (Ala.1984). -and- –Ex parte Wright, 225 Ala. 220, 222, 142 So. 672, 674 (1932). See also Fletcher v. Preston, 226 Ala. 665, 148 So. 137 (1933); and Striplin v. Ware, 36 Ala. 87 (1860), -and- Ex parte Bayliss, 550 So.2d 986, 988 n. 1 (Ala.1989) (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 1003 (5th ed.1979)). -and- Chandler v. Whatley, 238 Ala. 206, 208, 189 So. 751, 753 (1939) (quoting Striplin v. Ware, 36 Ala. at 89) (‘ ’). (SOURCE: FindLaw’s Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama case and opinions.

)_

—=—

Get it? The word _public_ means corporation (artificial family) of lower class common men (goyim) acting in legal persona because of lack of knowledge and therefore inability to govern ourselves. The nation is a corporation, and the United Nations is a bunch of nations placed under the same matrix code. But what you might not know is that another word for corporation is FAMILY — as in surrogate parent under the doctrine of master and servant (also called as volunteerism). In the terms below, the word “PLEASURE” when used legally means legal use of a _BENEFIT_, which implies the contractual relationship between person (agent) and the state (principal). So when your son takes a joy ride, it’s always considered corporate (family) business, and the head of the corporation (family) is the responsible party for any damages… FAMILY GROUP – Within purview of the family car doctrine, is not confined to persons related to the owner, but INCLUDES MEMBERS OF THE COLLECTIVE BODY OF PERSONS LIVING IN HIS HOUSEHOLD FOR WHOSE CONVENIENCE THE CAR IS MAINTAINED AND WHO HAVE AUTHORITY TO USE IT. The children of trust settlor including an adult son are MEMBERS of the settlor’s “family group” FOR INCOME TAX PURPOSES._ (Black4)_ FAMILY USE – That use ordinarily made by and suitable for the MEMBERS of a household WHETHER AS INDIVIDUALS OR COLLECTIVELY. The supply of water in a MUNICIPAL CORPORATION FOR FAMILY USE includes the supply of jails, hospitals, almshouses, schools, and other municipal institutions; id._ (Black4)_ MEMBER – ONE OF THE PERSONS CONSTITUTING A FAMILY; A PARTNERSHIP, ASSOCIATION, CORPORATION, GUILD, ETC. ONE OF THE PERSONS CONSTITUTING A COURT, A LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, ETC. A part or organ of the animal body; especially a limb OR OTHER SEPARATE PART. _(Black4)_ FAMILY PURPOSE DOCTRINE – A doctrine that the owner of a car, who gives it over to the use of his family and PERMITS IT TO BE OPERATED BY THE MEMBERS THEREOF, is liable for the injuries inflicted while being operated by a MEMBER of the family. The doctrine, that the owner of an automobile purchased or maintained for the pleasure of his family is liable for injuries inflicted by the machine while being used by the members of the family for their own pleasure. THE DOCTRINE IMPUTES RELATIONSHIP OF PRINCIPAL AND AGENT WHERE ONE MAINTAINS AN AUTOMOBILE FOR PLEASURE OR OTHER USE OF MEMBER OF HIS FAMILY. It is based on theory that EACH FAMILY MEMBER IN USING SUCH CAR FOR OWN PLEASURE IS CARRYING OUT THE PURPOSE FOR WHICH IT IS FURNISHED, AND IS THE OWNER’S AGENT OR SERVANT. IT IS FOUNDED UPON PRINCIPLES OF AGENCY OR OF MASTER AND SERVANT. It is restricted to automobiles maintained by owner FOR COMFORT, PLEASURE, AND CONVENIENCE OF MEMBERS OF HIS FAMILY. A FATHER IS NOT LIABLE MERELY BECAUSE HE IS HEAD OF FAMILY, BUT THE ONE WHO OWNS OR PROVIDES THE AUTOMOBILE IS LIABLE. A WIFE MAY BE HELD LIABLE FOR THE TORTS OF HER HUSBAND UNDER THE DOCTRINE. AGENCY IS THE VERY GENESIS OF THE DOCTRINE. Grandmother standing in _loco parentis_ to grandson was liable under the doctrine for grandson’s negligent operation of her automobile. Where wife owned automobile, husband was not liable under “family purpose doctrine,” for minor son’s negligent operation of the automobile, notwithstanding husband paid part of gasoline and garage bills…

_(Black4)_

FAMILY CAR DOCTRINE – The doctrine rests upon the basis that the automobile is furnished by the husband in his individual capacity and as common-law head of the family FOR THE USE OF THE FAMILY, and not as the agent of the community. It rests on theory THAT OPERATOR IS HUSBAND’S AGENT AND RUNS AUTOMOBILE IN HUSBAND’S “BUSINESS”; THAT WIFE IS HUSBAND’S AGENT IN CARRYING OUT ONE OF THE PURPOSES FOR WHICH THE AUTOMOBILE IS PURCHASED AND OWNED. Under the doctrine, A FATHER FURNISHING AUTOMOBILE FOR PLEASURE AND CONVENIENCE OF FAMILY MAKES THE USE OF AUTOMOBILE BY FAMILY HIS BUSINESS AND ANY MEMBER OF FAMILY DRIVING AUTOMOBILE WITH FATHER’S EXPRESS OR IMPLIED CONSENT IS THE FATHER’S AGENT AND THE FATHER IS LIABLE FOR THE MEMBER’S NEGLIGENCE. See, also, Family Automobile Doctrine and Family Purpose Doctrine._ (Black4)_ FAMILY AUTOMOBILE DOCTRINE – The doctrine is that one who owns and maintains an automobile for the general use of his household makes use of automobile for such purposes A PART OF HIS BUSINESS SO THAT ANY MEMBER USING AUTOMOBILE FOR THOSE PURPOSES UNDER GENERAL AUTHORITY TO DO SO BECOMES HIS REPRESENTATIVE, FOR WHOSE NEGLIGENCE HE IS RESPONSIBLE. It is an extension of the principle of respondeat superior to the relation created by operation of family use automobile. See, also, Family Car Doctrine and Family Purpose Doctrine. It is based on theory THAT MEMBERS OF FAMILY WERE ENGAGED IN A JOINT ENTERPRISE OR THAT CHILD WAS AGENT OF PARENTS. IF AN AUTOMOBILE IS OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY A FAMILY CORPORATION FOR GENERAL USE OF A FAMILY, such as that of corporation’s manager and one of its principal stockholders, CORPORATION MAY BE HELD LIABLE UNDER THE “FAMILY AUTOMOBILE DOCTRINE” TO THIRD PARTIES._ (Black4)_ FAMILY CAR – AUTOMOBILE USED TO SEND OWNER’S CHILDREN TO SCHOOL was “family car.”_ (Black4)_

—=—

Yes, dropping the kids off at school in the “family car” is considered an act (benefit) of commerce, done in legal persona (citizenship), as the head of or agent (member) of a legal family of US persons (a legal marriage is the incorporation of two fictional, legal persons that are both property of the state). This is the family (artificially ethnic race) of the United States, all 300+ million of us — a family (corporation) born (birthed) without love and borne (carried) through great deceit and deception. The state (national district) is the father of its national citizenships. And now you know why the scoundrels that started the United States were called as its “_fathers_” (false gods), and why the Bible insists that no man call any other but Jehovah (God) as “father.” This artificial, national _family_ (incorporation of persons) represents a politically-driven destruction of the recognition and proudness of heritage, family history, and age-old values. It’s what one might call the New World Order (international secularism), where all men identify as fictional (legal) persons and all such fictional persons are property (corporate employees called legally as sons and daughters) of the nation (family corporation). The false paradigm we call as _racism_, or what is the modernly naked, left-over, legalistic “race” classifications of the original eugenics movement used without understanding today and therefore without reason or logic behind it, as a recognition of race detached from any actual family (bloodline/heraldic) considerations, being a mostly modern construct created by Darwin’s evolutionary charting of nonsensical traits and size variations of human skulls and intelligence quotients, indeed has an organized, sinister, secular-humanist goal that is not the imaginary, fairy-tail color-blindness promoted through televised hatred and logical fallacy we see and hear all over the “news” and as entertainment on social media. Rather, this so-called _racism_ is a being served up as a deliciously delusional blindness to reality, to the beautiful Truth of Nature, as an institutionalized arrogance and indifference to God’s Design. Race (family) has nothing to do with it, except for the intention to destroy the True meaning of that word _race_ in the minds of men, until it is unrecognizable as a good thing… or even acknowledgeable in public and political forums as a self-evident

Truth.

In case you haven’t put the pieces together yet, legal “equality” is the direct opposite of race (family). In other words, equality = incorporation. Equality is necessary to destroy actual race, that is, to destroy the Real (bloodline) family unit, in order to cause all men to identify as legal entities instead of men of God (Nature), as equalized and thus normalized national citizens — artificial sons and daughters (persons) of the nation. This methodical averaging of the brain activity of children is much like the equalizer on a sound board or stereo, where all the frequency quotients can be flattened to the same level of unique output (zero), while certain individually wanted or preferred tones or traits can be notched up to acquire the desired effect. Before certain political groups or classes can be given more rights than all the other equally normalized citizenships, the group as a whole must be made to believe they are equal, even to the point of being required to hide or not to express those differences, be they knowledge or skill-based. Once the population is flattened, only then can a minority group be made to stand out and become unequal. There is no equality without inequity, for without that which is unequal to that which is forcibly declared and entrained to be equal there would be nothing to compare said label of equality to. In other words, to create a middle or lower class there must be a higher class, lest there be nothing to be lower than. Public school, for instance, teaches all kids equally, so that no one kid can get ahead of the rest without reprimand. One size fits all — though completely and provably a failure of logic — is the delusional paradigm of this modern, humanist pedagogy. Humanism is the false religion of the atheist, the anarchist, the spiritually dead. The big bang is the religion of science. The singularity is the religion of the futurist, who’s spirit is devoid of and opposed to his own Source. Each wants to play god in a different way, and the education system is there to further the cause of this man-as-god mind-set. And through this institutionalization of legal (artificial) equality not of men but of legal, fictional (bloodless) persons in law, the foundation is laid to cause total inequity through such institutions as civil rights, that is, special rights for special groups that suddenly aren’t in any way equal anymore to the rest of the common, legalistic family. And so the values we associate with family (race) now come from the corporation nation, not the traditional values of our True family (race). In the end, the man that through legal personhood accepts artificial, legal equality with another man’s projected legal persona can never again claim God-given, Natural rights. For the source of the legal person is not God, not Nature, and no man may commune with God when acting in a lie, when acting in legal (anti-God) persona (mask). There is only one actual definition of the legal term equality, which is that all persons of the state stand with a required and equal punishment under the law. One that acts in equality instead of in True equity deserves not equity from others, for equity requires moral choice, and acting upon moral choice in the legal (immoral) realm is illegal. And yet, in what seems a paradox, everywhere you look in Hollywood and its governmentally sponsored and controlled viral outlets of news and entertainment media one can find only the most blatant of race-baiting, and more specifically the demonization of any modicum of “white” racial, that is, cultural ethnicity and identity. Even so-called “white” people are learning to hate themselves for being “white,” though I’ve never actually met a “white person” in my life, since legal persons are only fictions of law. If Hollywood is to be believed in its re-writing and revisionist defeat of actual history through entertainment, it was the “black” people that freed the slaves, and “white” slavery didn’t even exist, let alone the modern black-on-black slave trade in Africa and the sex-trafficking of every skin-color happening right now. Again, racism isn’t in dictionaries before the 1900’s. Why? Because before this artificial construct of racism there was only race. You see, race means family. Bloodlines, not skin color. That which was traditionally racially-motivated was in fact family-motivated. Corporations and/or governments (States) were historically created to protect the prosperity of bloodlines of families, their family (racial) inheritance, which by their very design in Nature are, as a generalization, often similar in skin-color. Race is indeed a generic term until it is purposefully, intentionally applied to some thing. Webster defined it as it was in 1828: RACE – _noun_ –  1. THE LINEAGE OF A FAMILY, OR CONTINUED SERIES OF DESCENDANTS FROM A PARENT WHO IS CALLED THE STOCK. A _RACE_ IS THE SERIES OF DESCENDANTS INDEFINITELY. THUS ALL MANKIND ARE CALLED THE _RACE_ OF ADAM; the Israelites are of the _race_ of Abraham and Jacob. Thus we speak of A _RACE_ OF KINGS, THE _RACE_ OF CLOVIS OR CHARLEMAGNE; A _RACE_ OF NOBLES, etc. Hence the long _race_ of Alban fathers come. 2. A GENERATION; A FAMILY OF DESCENDANTS. A _race_ of youthful and unhandled colts. 3. A PARTICULAR BREED; as a _race_ of mules; a _race_ of horses; a _race_ of sheep. Of such a _race_ no matter who is king. 4. A ROOT; as race-ginger, ginger in the root or not pulverized. 5. A particular strength or taste of wine; a kind of tartness… _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)_ RACISM/RACIST – ??? – SORRY, THOSE TERMS HAVEN’T BEEN CREATED BY

THE COMMUNISTS YET.

—=—

Should we stop referring to the color of a “Yellow Lab” because the “Black Lab” might be offended by the Truth of the color of its

fur?

Should we stop distinguishing bell peppers by their color because they

all taste the same?

Racism is not specifically defined in this 1828 dictionary because in the minds of men of old there was no such thing. There was only family, cousins, genealogy, heraldry, and the fact that whole countries and cultures were set up (incorporated) and based therefore on these blood-based “family values” across the world. And they still are. America was certainly no exception to this rule, though perhaps the first family to be intentionally overcome (planned) by its own immigration policies in order to create the notion of a new global world (secular humanist) order. It is certainly not a “racist” action to attempt to protect ones own moral fabric of society created from the like-mindedness of a family (race) of men from the influence and degradation caused by the acceptance and toleration of different races (family bloodlines) that have differing or even completely opposing family values, religious notions, and moral codes. Yet to call men of moral character based on such racial (family) tradition as “racist,” that is, those that wish to preserve the very ideals of the foundation and reason behind the original forming of a political body (State), can only be labeled as exactly what it is — intolerance. Today’s modern construct of so-called “racism” is a weapon of purely political motivation, used vehemently and ironically without prejudice to foment the intolerance of Real family so as to make the “State” the father, the head of the corporation (artificial, surrogate, legal family), and especially the destruction of such traditional family (race-based) values. To destroy a society, a culture, and ultimately the law and ability of a blood-related private people to enjoy the benefits of family and Natural liberty based on moral, self-Evident Law, one only need to project the active ignorance of Eugenic race bias into the common, dumbed-down population base so that they turn against one another, so that every neighbor is thine enemy, a competitor, and a threat to some empty idol of the god of skin-color and mammon. Ultimately, the goal of the men behind these eugenic ideals is to impose a universal, legally induced (figurative/artificial) persona of corruption of blood in all men regardless of skin-color, or what the constitution calls as “attainder,” and therefore to establish a global citizenship that requires the taking away of liberty and the power to self-govern through surrender to one of many corporation nations (the voluntary taking of the mixed, legal surname over the Christian name to render a legal persona). He that cannot show his bloodline, that his blood is of God (of Nature), of a Real Family (Race) of God, and not the legal state (artificially birth-certified and registered to the district/Caesar), is therefore a slave of the State (fictional creator of legal persons). For persons have no blood, and their creator god is only man’s government. Only through legal persona (mask/status) can we all be made into the humanistic race of _adam_, banned from the Garden and doomed to suffer the wrath of disobeying the Law of Nature (God). The word adam in the Bible translates to mankind, by the way, or in other words all men not spiritually free of the world (artificial construct) of man’s design. Adam (mankind) is man fallen, those entrapped in the anti-God legal matrix. The story of Adam as a singular man is a personification of all men, personification being the only way to tell such a story of moral teaching. We are all acting as adam did, biting into the apple (fig) of artificial knowledge (information), the concepts, lies, and inventions of man that go against the Law and Design of Nature (God). The metaphor is beautiful and instructive when read correctly and

applied to oneself.

But the race-baiting politicians and other deceitful entertainers (professional, paid liars) seek to divide so as to conquer, to oppose all moral Law, and to cause you to do the same. To do this, all that might disagree must be labeled as racist, just like Lenin intended the fallacious title to be used. And finally, when each “side” of the now equalized debt-slaves are too afraid to speak, and when our hatred of each side is the guiding principal behind policy and entertainment, then the laws of forced equality can be made firm, and we all become like a deranged triangle, where each side blames the other for the shape we are in though never actually seeing any side but ones own. Yet all the sides of a triangle are _equal_, aren’t they? The point is not to bring us together, but to force us together when such a disposition is impossible in Nature. This constant recreation of forced turmoil by folding the different cultural and often opposing laws and religious moral foundations is the total opposite of what the Bible instructs. We are supposed to leave Babylon, not force it into legal existence, and certainly not to tolerate such destruction of our moral, foundational heritage and counterbalancing, spiritual Law. We are supposed to preserve and enforce the Moral Law, not allow it to be mixed and tainted by other cultural, legal, and religious influences. But hey, such moral reactions would be labeled fallaciously as “racist” in these strange days.

—=—

“YOU KNOW, TO JUST BE GROSSLY GENERALISTIC, YOU COULD PUT HALF OF TRUMP’S SUPPORTERS INTO WHAT I CALL THE BASKET OF DEPLORABLES. RIGHT? . THE RACIST, SEXIST, HOMOPHOBIC, XENOPHOBIC, ISLAMOPHOBIC — YOU NAME IT. AND UNFORTUNATELY THERE ARE PEOPLE LIKE THAT…” _–Hillary Clinton_

—=—

Intolerance is tolerance… Should the average “American” be tolerable to these flattering titles of opposing lifestyles, as that which absolutely defeats and opposes the moral (unwritten) standard of conduct? If so, then what use is it to have a country and law in the first place? What is a country created for but to ensure a like-minded people sharing a system of law and culture exclusive of all other lifestyles and systems be protected in that moral belief system? Should the foundation of Bible Law as common law be forgotten or ignored to make room for a completely different and opposing system of law and religion, just so the appearance of intolerance can be pretended not to exist in the minds of “American” men? And come to think of it, what country, state, or nation in the history of the world has ever not been xenophobic or consequently been destroyed by its sudden tolerance of outside political and religious influence? Wikipedia explains that xenophobia is: “…the fear and distrust of that which is perceived to be foreign

or strange.

Xenophobia can

involve perceptions of an ingroup towards an outgroup

and can manifest

itself in suspicion of the activities of others, and a desire to eliminate their presence to secure a presumed purity and may relate to a fear of losing national, ethnic, religious, linguistic, cultural, social class or racial identity.

…”

—=—

Isn’t that the purpose of starting an organized structure of society? Isn’t that the purpose of creating a corporation, its bylaws, and its leaders? In other words, isn’t every country, every tribe, every “people,” and for that matter every family (race) by default steeped in xenophobia? Can a race exist without racism? In other words, can race exist without being prideful and proud of what that race (family) is specifically because it is different than all others? Can one man call another man a racist without acknowledging the fact that his idea of racism stems from being a different race than he that he calls as racist? Can we really deny the existence of race so as to not appear to be racist, when the Truth of the matter is that we cannot help or quit being of a race (family) in the first place? Do you believe that the denial of the existence of race somehow alters the fact that we are all of different races (families/bloodlines)? Do you not see the trickery here? Do you not see the social engineering being foisted upon you so that you have no power to defend yourself as part of a race (family), and therefore have no power to act morally or from the Moral Law of Nature, because you can no longer identify with your own family (race) values? Do you not see that this is all designed to steal your soul away from Nature, away from your Source? For better or worse, all of these constructs, from countries to religions, are artificial families (corporations) that have instilled their own artificial (legally derived) family values as law from the actual family (race) that started them. Only tolerance of the intolerable, those that act purposefully against the founding family (race) values, can destroy the country. And the greatest tool to manage such a hostile takeover is the good old manipulation of Christian tolerance. Not balanced, educated tolerance with all other virtues, but the artificial kind that is enforced by legal law — the kind that has allowed countless opposing religions and legal systems to be legally protected by government as they attempt to destroy and change the entire structure of law, religion, and family (race) values that made America what it is. Good or bad, right or wrong, whatever all countries around the world have become, their strengths and weaknesses, are solely to be blamed on the race (family) that created and continues to sustain them. If the race (family) is driven out of its own creation, the country no longer exists except in empty name

only.

Now riddle me this… What country in history was not built on a distrust and fear of other cultures? What country is ever not foreign to another? There simply is no such thing as a non-foriegn country. And it is a much quoted subject that the man or country of men without fear of interference is certain to fail, and will ultimately be assimilated into another in just a few short generations. In other words, a People (family) that tolerates another way of life and law must necessarily lose their own, for two opposing forces must, by their nature, repel each other. If this isn’t clear, try pushing two magnets together the wrong way. They must be forced together, and the repulsion will never actually cease, and so neither can the executive military force behind it. We must be bound by the invisible chains of legalistic law in order to merge all cultures, all systems of law and religion into one global society, one soulless, bloodless family of the fallen _adamites_. This is like blowing up a balloon past its elastic capacity, knowing it will explode from the pressure of being forced to accept more than it can tolerate. I guess the balloon is therefore racist against certain air? Those enforcing this artificial tolerance know exactly what the result will be, and the United Nations was set up to govern the madness and spiritually dead order out of chaos they are instilling. I want you to really consider this statement by the former first lady (of the Royal American bloodline) for a moment. More to the point, consider its _holier-than-thou_ source. Hillary Clinton is part of the royal family, that is, the bloodlines of European nobility and kings, just as her husband (cousin) is, and just as every president and vice-president that has ever been placed by congress into the United States corporation is. In other words, Clinton’s power is a direct result of her race, her “white-blooded” (pure) family line, which by her own choice of words makes her the most “racist” figure in that room! What are the queens and kings of Europe if not one big, unhappy family (race)? And what are all of us to them if not tolerated, deplorable goyim? The following are all a single race (family bloodline). They are not different races, only different corporations held under the same family estate. And, like the United States, they are all organized by a constitution. Constitutions are a dime a dozen, sorry… And they’re all hereditary in their lines of succession, or in other words, it’s all in the family (race). There are no heirs if there is no race (family). You really have to be a fool to believe that the United States president is not also in actuality another family minion upon this list. Trump is as “white” as they come, because in their world, the word white means a pure-blooded royal descendent of the kings of the following kingdoms:

STATE

TYPE

SUCCESSION

DYNASTY

TITLE

FIRST-IN-LINE

KINGDOM

OF BELGIUM

CONSTITUTION

HEREDITARY

SAXE-

COBURG AND GOTHA

KING

HEIR APPARENT: PRINCESS ELISABETH, DUCHESS OF BRABANT

(ELDEST CHILD)

KINGDOM

OF DENMARK

CONSTITUTION

HEREDITARY

GLÜCKSBURG

QUEEN

HEIR APPARENT: CROWN PRINCE FREDERIK

(ELDEST

CHILD)

PRINCIPALITY

OF LIECHTENSTEIN

CONSTITUTION

HEREDITARY

LIECHTEN-STEIN

SOV. PRINCE

HEIR APPARENT: HEREDITARY PRINCE ALOIS

(ELDEST SON)

GRAND DUCHY

OF LUXEMBOURG

CONSTITUTION

HEREDITARY

BOURBON

GRAND DUKE

HEIR APPARENT: HEREDITARY GRAND DUKE GUILLAUME

(ELDEST CHILD)

PRINCIPALITY

OF MONACO

CONSTITUTION

HEREDITARY

GRIMALDI

SOV. PRINCE

HEIR APPARENT: HEREDITARY PRINCE JACQUES (ONLY LEGITIMATE SON)

KINGDOM OF

THE NETHERLANDS

CONSTITUTION

HEREDITARY

ORANGE-NASSAU /

AMSBERG

KING

HEIR APPARENT: PRINCESS CATHARINA-AMALIA, PRINCESS OF ORANGE

(ELDEST CHILD)

KINGDOM OF NORWAY

CONSTITUTION

HEREDITARY

GLÜCKSBURG

KING

HEIR APPARENT: CROWN PRINCE HAAKON

(ONLY

SON)

KINGDOM OF SPAIN

CONSTITUTION

HEREDITARY

BOURBON

KING

HEIR PRESUMPTIVE: PRINCESS LEONOR, PRINCESS OF ASTURIAS

(ELDER

DAUGHTER)

KINGDOM OF SWEDEN

CONSTITUTION

HEREDITARY

BERNADOTTE

KING

HEIR APPARENT: CROWN PRINCESS VICTORIA

(ELDEST CHILD)

UNITED KINGDOM OF

GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND

CONSTITUTION

HEREDITARY

WINDSOR

QUEEN

HEIR APPARENT: PRINCE CHARLES, PRINCE OF WALES

(ELDEST SON)

—=—

Yes, those subjects of royalty also have a constitution, you know, that thing you as a national citizenship as a status (property) created by congress has been tricked into worshiping even though it has nothing to do with you under that common, lower-class status of denizened personhood? But they are at least smart enough on some level not to worship that constitution as anything but what it is, a form of idolatrous worship of false gods mediated by magical, legal terms of art to give the appearance of some pretended state of independence, while keeping intact the “royal prerogative” and war powers of the king and queen (head of church and state) of the Crown Corporation and its realms of debt-slaves. Even some Canadians actually think they (as subjects) are not under the power of the queen, that the corporation of “Canada” is not part of that royal corporation sole ruled under the Crown. They at least know, if even in doubt of their own disposition, that they are subjects of a sovereign corporation headed by a false god (king/queen/prince). In America, though as a nation it clearly and openly calls itself sovereign under the law of nations and refers to we the common citizenships as its subjects and customers, we somehow have instilled in ourselves a false-sense of artificial detachment, of freedom from tyranny. We are like a single goldfish in a bowl that believes itself to be somehow sovereign from the man that feeds us and changes our piss and shit-filled water, without whom we would suffocate in our own excrement. We lie to ourselves and teach those unreasonable lies to our children without question, and as children we believe our own lies even after we grow out of most other childhood fantasies. We figure out that Santa Clause and the Easter Bunny aren’t real, but continue to fool ourselves that we are a naturally free people even as we use and claim the protection of the legal property (status in personhood) of the United States government and pay its tax (tribute to Caesar). God created men. Governments create persons. Big difference! Perhaps you have forgotten or been brainwashed out of knowing what some of these words actually mean? HEIR-APPARENT – _noun_ – The man who, DURING THE LIFE OF HIS ANCESTOR, IS ENTITLED TO SUCCEED TO HIS ESTATE OR CROWN. _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)_ HEREDITARY – _adjective –  _1. That has DESCENDED FROM AN ANCESTOR. He is in possession of a large _hereditary_ estate. 2. THAT MAY DESCEND FROM AN ANCESTOR TO AN HEIR; DESCENDIBLE TO AN HEIR AT LAW. The crown of Great Britain is _hereditary. _3. THAT IS OR MAY BE TRANSMITTED FROM A PARENT TO A CHILD; as _hereditary _pride; _hereditary_ bravery; _hereditary_ disease. _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)_ PRINCE – _noun_ – prins.  1. In a general sense, A SOVEREIGN; the chief and independent ruler of a nation or state. THUS WHEN WE SPEAK OF THe princes of Europe, we include emperors and kings. Hence, a chief in general; as a _prince_ of the celestial host. 2. A SOVEREIGN in a certain territory; one who has the government of a particular state or territory, but holds of a superior to whom he owes certain services; as the princes of the German states. 3. THE SON OF A KING OR EMPEROR, OR THE ISSUE OF A ROYAL FAMILY; AS PRINCES OF THE BLOOD. In England, the eldest son of the king is created _prince_ of Wales… _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)_

—=—

If the prince (or president) is a sovereign, and you are its subject, then you are not sovereign. Worst of all, you have either forgotten or choose to remain actively ignorant of the fact that the sovereign royalty of America is of the same bloodlines (family) as the royalty of these European rulers. You choose to casually ignore the most race-oriented regime of corporations (nations) in the world, in all of history, the royal houses that lay claim to most of the (secular) world. You pretend that elections are fair, and that just anyone, from any race/family (bloodline) can become president. And nowadays, with such horrific race-baiting being pushed in all forms of entertainment and media, you are being entrained to believe in the fallacy that only “white” skinned people are in power. In other words, in stead of realizing the truth about the completely race-orientated royal bloodlines (families) that rule every nation, we are all being tricked into blaming all problems created by those exclusive (actual racist) bloodlines (presidents, vice-presidents, congress, corporate CEO’s, etc.) on the color of skin, completely missing the actual problem that is the respect of such royal (uncorrupted) bloodlines. All blood in reality is red when it’s visible to the Truth of the open air without legal (anti-God) consideration, not white or black. We are ruled by one race (foreign family) of men (heirs) according to heraldic, genealogical heritage, and we don’t even know it’s happening. Instead, this family of absolutely corrupt “royals” confuses and obfuscates from this reality by convincing the black people that its all the white people’s fault, the brown people that its all the yellow people’s fault, and the white people that its every other color’s fault. But the Truth is that none of this has anything to do with skin-color and everything to do with the actual meaning of the word “race.” Race is not determined by skin color, but by bloodline (family). “We, the People” is not us, white or black. It is a select bloodline, a family of men enjoined and working together to suppress, control, and extort in every way imaginable the rest of the common population of Earth. And that includes all skin-colors, with no regard to race (family). In fact, the whole idea and purpose of national citizenship is to pretend destruction, that is, legal corruption (attainder) of the blood and therefore bloodline and blood-rights of all other men not in the so-called royal family. No blood, no God-given rights, for they are inherent only to free men, not subjects in false persona (national citizenships). Perhaps you’ve never considered that there is no such thing as a “people” in Nature? There was no people of England until it was invented. There were no Americans until America was legally created. All so-called people (a legal title) are inventions of men. And so any incorporation of “people” that supposedly exists is necessarily a fraud, illegitimate, and certainly not a Creation of Nature (God). Perhaps you never thought to ask the question as a United States citizenship just who “We, the People” actually is? Perhaps you’ve never realized that a subject of the United States is therefore a subject of whomever “We, the People” happen to be? Trust me, you would know if you were one of _them_, that is, one of their race (bloodline), for you would be declaring such racism in order to be part of that elite (upper-class) band of race-driven rulers of the rest of us. To be clear, this is the epitome of True _racism_, and is, in fact, the only Real racism that exists in the world. It’s called royalty. Nobility. Heraldry. Genealogy. Elitism. The upper-class. And only _they_ are considered as “white” because the meaning of this word _white_ in legalese refers to the purity of blood as it relates only to the royal, inheritable (family) bloodline and therefore the line of blood-right succession, not skin color. Again, I tell you that Barack Obama is “white” according to legal law, being a direct descendent of the Royal family (race), as are most “black” skinned actors and politicians that are of that bloodline. You think Hally Barry isn’t considered “white” ??? LOL! Every one of them is in line for the throne, down to the last and most distant legitimately blood-linked cousin. In other words, to be a member (cousin) of the “legitimate” royal family (bloodline) is to stand as an inheritor of the corporations created by them, which they call as their kingdoms. As a common citizen of any nation, no man is actually considered as a “white” man, for the very conception of citizenship to a nation requires the forfeiture and attainder of such consideration by blood-right (God-given rights) in exchange for legal (artificial) rights. The goal is to turn all men of all races not royal unto the identity of legal persons (fictions without blood). This modern conceptualization of racism is designed to do one and only one thing — to destroy the family unit, and therefore to destroy what is known as family values. But this sinister effort is only designed for the common citizenships of nations. The royal families exist behind the scenes, hidden beyond the corporate administrative state set up to control the plebes. Even today the queen of England pretends to be honorary, ceremonial, and not in charge of the “constitutional monarchy” that is the United Kingdom and Union. The further out of sight the hidden royal hand can exist, the more powerful it becomes. We have no idea what it means anymore when we see signs that point to “private land” or a “private road” ahead, only that we are not supposed to go there. We only know that we would be trespassing if we did. Yet we have no idea that such a sign represents a different jurisdiction, a different realm of landholding bloodline families. We only know that we are not part of that family. And we treat that invisible border across that private land the same way we treat the US border, respecting that what lies beyond is unwelcoming, foreign territory we need permission to tread upon. The very definition of an individual estate, country, nation, or state is that it’s FOREIGN to all others. All 50 States are foreign to the United States (the district of Washington/New Columbia). Again, in this word _foreign_ we garner that the law is PRIVATE and strict, and therefore totally intolerant of any other culture or law — intolerant, in other words, of any other People (State) except by contract (constitution/compact/treaty, etc.). This is, for all intents and purposes, the way of the world in every country, culture, and creed (belief system). They that create a State (incorporated, private/foreign People) are always, without exception, a bloodline (family) of men. The formation of a nation is by definition the formation of an ethnicity, the creation of a new artificial “race” (legal family/corporation) of men separate and foreign to what we call as the _human_ race. Man is not human. What is human is that which belongs to men, such as the human anatomy. Humans are not creations of God, of Nature, for the word human is manmade, a scientific classification no different that equine, feline, or canine. To be human is to be the property of man, not a man. To be referred to as a human is to be considered only as an animal, or in other words and by their own definition, as that which has no soul, a thing without self-anima, a thing without (outside of) God’s Realm and Law. The human soul does not belong to a human, it belongs to a man. What is of man is a human quality, but no man is human. To be a “human being” is to act in humanism. To be a man is to be a Creation of God. Human is only ever a property (quality/trait) of man, never the actual man. A People is never a man, for to be part of a people is to be something artificial, something that is invented by and therefore belongs to man, not God. No man is a people, for the word _people_ is a plural. To be part of a people is to no longer be a man of God. This distinction is the foundation of the difference between moral and civil law. Civil law is for people, while moral law is only for men. The moral law must always be held higher, by all men, than that of the legal, civil law of any people he may be voluntarily a part of. It is this distinction, this protective cloak of spiritual, moral Law that has been lost to God’s _people_. When the foundation of anything fails, the super-structure built upon it must also, self-evidently fall. This is a maxim of law. The funny thing is that when a person (subject) of the United States is sued, we get a letter from “the People of” whatever State that court is in. We, whom aren’t the people, know without question that we aren’t the people simply because we are sued by the people. The people don’t sue the people, because the people is a single, legal corporation. There is only one people, and it obviously ain’t us. This gets confusing because the general term “people” is used to describe us, as _the common people_. But the People in the constitution is only referring to the incorporation of that specific “white” the race (bloodline family) as a specific, exclusive “People” (capitalized), not the common goyim. This private, non-ethnic status of royal privilege, by definition, requires a certain “purity” of blood, in heraldic and genealogical terms of construction. No State (People) exists without this racial (family) background in the world. This is why traditionally we would expect to see Japanese looking people in Japan, Chinese looking people in China, and Scandinavian looking people in the Scandinavian countries. This is not vulgar _racism_ as is promoted to common goyim. This is the True meaning of _race_. Without race (family), one has no State (private People). And without a private People (State), one has no reason to track and keep record of pure (white) blood. And this is the very opposite of national (mixed) ethnicity (national identity). For the royal families of Africa and Thailand, I assure you, have white (pure) blood despite their dark complexion according to their heraldic records. Pure blood, of course, doesn’t actually exist. It merely refers to the active recording of genealogical records in heraldry, no different than any corporation is structured to reflect a president, vice president, and all the line of succession by blood relation. To be clear, I know no man that does not seek to pass on his inheritance to his bloodline child (issue). In other words, you are equally as guilty of invoking this false, proprietary lineage as any royal. Only the scope and size of the commercial transaction of inheritance is different. In this way, we must acknowledge the fact that we are all in fact _racist_, which ultimately means nothing at all in Nature (Reality), only that we wish the best for our own children (family bloodline). But you must understand the difference between your status as a national citizenship (commercial vessel) and those private, royal rulers of that persona (property). You have been tricked and continuously brainwashed into believing that your family is the nation (corporation) you were born into. And you identify your race by that nation. There is no such think as Japan or China or Mexico in Nature. These are corporations created by private families (races). Ethnicity is simply not what you believe it to be. Ethnicity can only be understood from the perspective of master and slave. If you ask a slave what slave-master’s estate he belongs to, he would tell you the family name of his master. So too does a citizenship of any nation identify his origin by the nation he was birthed (registered/taxed) into. And so, to us, it seems perfectly reasonable to identify ourselves as “Americans” or as “Englishmen” or as “African.” This is no different than saying I am an employee (agent) of “Walmart” or “Target” corporation. A nation is an artificial construct, a fake family (race), made solely of persons (fictional characters). The fact that you have been entrained to identify yourself by your ethnicity (nationally spoken language) is a cosmic joke, for the whole reason behind such identity (pretended sameness as fiction) is to taint your bloodline (family), to take you out of Nature and place you in attainder (corruption of blood) so that you can and must be governed by the governments (mind control) of nations. Yet, as I’ve written about extensively, these royal families (races) are not of the nations. They created the nations as holding companies for we, their debt-enslaved goyim. They are private (foreign) and sovereign from all nations. Most importantly, to identify yourself by ethnicity is to remove yourself from God (Nature). It is to cause you to deny God as your Source of Existence and Law, and thus cause you to worship false idols and gods (magistrates). I am not American, I am of the Universe (Jehovah). But to the royal families (race), we are all just one color, the color of corruption, which is the color of heathens. We are all the color black

to them…

ETHNOLOGY – _noun –_ A TREATISE ON NATIONS. _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)_ ETHNICAL – _adjective_ –  HEATHEN; PAGAN; PERTAINING TO THE GENTILES OR NATIONS NOT CONVERTED TO CHRISTIANITY; OPPOSED TO JEWISH AND CHRISTIAN. _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)_ ETHNIC – _noun_ – A HEATHEN; A PAGAN. _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)_ ETHNICISM – _noun_ – Heathenism; PAGANISM; IDOLATRY. _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)_ HEATHEN – _noun_ –  1. A PAGAN; A GENTILE; ONE WHO WORSHIPS IDOLS, OR IS UNACQUAINTED WITH THE TRUE GOD. In the Scriptures, the word seems to comprehend ALL NATIONS EXCEPT THE JEWS OR ISRAELITES, AS THEY WERE ALL STRANGERS TO THE TRUE RELIGION, AND ALL ADDICTED TO IDOLATRY. The word may now be applied perhaps to ALL NATIONS, EXCEPT TO CHRISTIANS AND MOHAMMEDANS. Heathen, without the plural termination, is used PLURALLY OR COLLECTIVELY, FOR GENTILES OR _HEATHEN_ NATIONS. Ask of me, and I will give thee the _heathen_ for thine inheritance. Psalms

2:8 . Heathen,

however, has a plural, expressing two or more individuals. If men have reason to be heathens in Japan– The precepts and examples of the ancient heathens. 2. A RUDE, ILLITERATE, BARBAROUS PERSON. – _adjective_ – Gentile, pagan; as a _heathen_ author. _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)_

—=—

The reference to Christians above is not a reference to the false denominations of corporate, legalist religions set up by the state to deceive and distract you from the True meaning of God and the Bible, but is a title placed on those that cannot and will not become part of the nations of men because they choose to follow only the Law of God, not men. These are the True followers of Christ, who understand that Christ is the Law (Word) of God, not a mere idol to worship as a false god. To be called a “Christian” while at the same time be called a citizen of any nation is to be exactly the fool they want us all to be, having two flattering titles that are diametrically opposed to one another, representing two completely opposing systems of law. This is how to create chaos, and then construct a legal, secular system of

order from it.

So that this concept of bloodline as race is clear, please consider that the current, hereditarily acquired “black-skinned” kings of the kingdoms of Morocco, Eswatini, and Lesotho in Africa are by their very assent to the thrown racist. They are in power because of their bloodline (race), which must be understood to be legally considered as “white” in legal (artificial) color, meaning pure-bred from their own royal race (People/family) that reigned before them. And waiting in the wings are eager, blood-related men seeking to take that throne away from their brother, sister, father, or cousin. Race is power. Racial discrimination is the center of that power, and is the very difference between common, national citizenships and the People (State) that rules over them. Without race, there would be no countries, no kingdoms. Just what do you think _Game Of Thrones _is about, anyway? _(Hint: In that show, those are cousins having sex with and entering into arranged marriages with direct, pure bloodline cousins to carry on the “royal” pretended-to-be-legitimate line of succession, and killing each other in order to claim hereditary blood-right as heir-apparent to those various, interrelated thrones, as head of those corporations. It’s a fictional show about the actual fiction of pretended royal families that still rule over us corrupted, tainted-blood commoners today. It’s all part of training you to remain under the illusionary power and control of their self-proclaimed superior race, by fictionalizing and pretending such things don’t actually exist anymore, not since dragons roamed the earth. And unicorns. Corporations are ruthless… because it’s always been all in the family. Royalty is just a sophisticated mafia family, organized crime under the guise of the magic and trickery that is rebranded as the prestige of royal blood.)_ Now, where does this leave the race-baiting meme of so-called “white” privilege? Imagine if I went to Japan and entered a Japanese family’s house (a term that means family or race) and exclaimed that they have “red privilege.” Or how about I go to Iran and claim that those families of the same race have “brown privilege.” How about the “yellow privilege” of the main families in China? Yet we have been entrained to accept that the people of Denmark and America have “white privilege” despite every other imagined colored race in the world. Meanwhile, we are all being extorted and seriously screwed over in so many ways by the only actual race of “People” that are still able to claim their bloodline (family/race) as the private founding families of the States (People) united. They’ve made us equal in our enslavement with the right hand while using the left hand to focus our attention on each other instead of the Source of our collective despotism, which we have been fooled into thinking is the price of freedom. And now, by turning this non-existent concept of racism into a so-called legal “hate-crime,” we now have the veritable legal tool to cause each other harm by turning this fallacy of race (family) into a dirty word, and by punishing anyone that acknowledges it. Again, this is the only way we can be governed legally, if we do harm and injure (bring into false, legal law) each other for non-crimes that are legally (artificially) imposed on nonsensical terms like “racist” hate crimes. How do you destroy a People, a family, that bases its society on “family values?” You do exactly what these royal bloodlines have done to us — destroy the ability of men to claim to be part of a family. If you take away race (family) from a man, you necessarily take away his ability to practice in action any form of family (race) values. And in their place, we must be convinced to voluntarily accept and thus tolerate all that is opposed to and that is actively-at-war-with our family (race), leaving us defenseless (without the ability to bear heraldic Arms of our families) against the legal matrix simulation. War and peace have no distinction, for either way the commerce of the gods of mammon shall be done. Amen. War is a very profitable commercial transaction, with instant rewards. Peace just takes a little longer to reach such profit levels. Since the True meanings of these words have been lost on most of us as we are entertained and entranced with lies and propaganda about how we are all racist and shameful even though we are all considered legally (artificially) equal under the law as tainted, blood-corrupted debt-slaves, regardless of skin-color, we fail to recognize the difference between a nation (commercial corporation) and a State (private, incorporated People). Many of us call ourselves as “Christians” but are “unacquainted with the True God” because corporate religion is merely empty idol worship – the worship of the form of symbols, statues, heroes, saviors, fictional personas, flattering titles, and saints without substance, without actually obeying the Law of God, that is, without ever being or becoming Christ-like as instructed. This is (we are) what they of the private, royal bloodlines (race) call as heathenism, paganism, the lower class of goyim. Those that are citizenships in any nation (corporation) can only be gentiles, for they (we) follow the legal law above and most often against that of the Law of Nature (God’s Law/Word). This is not religion, this is law. This is the way the legal system works, causing voluntary attainder (legal, fictional corruption of blood), which causes class division, as those who claim blood-right (the right to Bear family Arms) and those who have rescinded that right in order to accept replacement legal rights granted and enforced by the still lawfully recognized families (races). This is every nation. The actual pre-modern Jews, as mentioned here, had no nation, which is why they were a free people and, having no nation, were called “the international jew.” The nation of Israel, unlawful and illegitimate as it is, is not full of Jews, it is full of goyim that call themselves as “Jews” just as this supposedly Christian nation of America is full of goyim that call themselves as “Christians.” No follower of Christ (God’s Law) would take a false god or its false legal (e.g. civil) law (doctrine) above that of the Law of Nature (God). In fact, that is the very aspect that confirms one is a True follower of Christ, one that in his or her actions is Christ-like, and therefore in all ways intolerable to the legal systems and nation of men acting in legal persona (anti-God). Likewise, the Native American Indian tribes and other aboriginal free peoples were never conquered (purchased) until they agreed to become “nations” instead of free tribes. To be an Indian nation is to abandon the Indian culture and life to become just another ethnic class of lower-class goyim (heathen gentiles). The citizenships of Israel today, as well, are persons of the nation, not free men of and under God. They have fallen for the oldest trick in the book, thinking that being a member of the so-called “Jewish” nation of Israel (a legal corporation) is synonymous with being and acting like Israelite from the Bible. It is the same with the “Cristians” that believe that being a follower of Christ (God’s Law) is the same as being a member of a “Christian” nation or false, legally derived religion (corporation). A nation is the perfect example of Orwell’s meme that _freedom is slavery_, as all men enjoined in citizenship to any nation are its debt-slaves, free to choose their mode of employment (being used) as a commodity in a neo-feudalistic human capital management system (capitalism). The point is that every nation is run by some bloodline of men, some hereditarily conjoined club of “royal” (upper-class) rulers that remain private (foreign) from that nation in their own State (private People). In other words, we are all ruled by

tolerated _racism_.

You can say it till you’re red in the face, but the statistics always paint a different picture… Racism is a lie told to those not of the royal, master race, in order to hide their own institutionalized, millennium-old heredity-based racism, by focusing all goyim on a war between cultural differences, which are falsely attributed to skin-color so as to keep us busy fighting each other instead of they that enslave us. The truth is that every one of us are equal, that is, equally under

their spell…

They look like us, but once you see these royal “families” for what they are, you realize that the lie of cultural, ethnic racism is only skin deep. Black or white, or anywhere in between, we are all trapped in the lower, vulgar class they created for us, for all of our blood has been turned black, our True Nature tainted, our souls corrupted. It is amusing to think of a white slave and a black slave arguing over who is more enslaved, using only skin-color to determine what is otherwise self-evident. For Orwell seems to have shortened one of his equative, dystopian maxims… _Equality is Slavery. Slavery is Freedom. Freedom is equality. Repeat.

_

If equality is slavery and slavery is freedom, then freedom is

slavery._

_It’s simple math. And what is equality but forced tolerance? And what is forced tolerance but institutionalized intolerance of any individual cultural strength and unity, a culture of cultural hate? Still don’t get it? This cultural neutering, the making impotent of cultural custom through equalization, is the same as allowing the common people to worship (think about) God however they see fit, but never to actually act on the moral law that scriptures teach. In other words, it is literally illegal to practice moral law. You cannot be Christian (a follower of Christ/God’s Law) and also be under an opposing, legal system of law (false doctrine/law). A Christian, by definition, cannot tolerate anything legal (man-made law), for legal law is always, 100% opposed to (the undoing of) the Law of Nature (God). One can’t live according to truth (God) at all times and also adhere to the lies of legalism. Likewise, no culture can possibly be tolerable of the influence and immigration of another, especially when the customs and laws are different and opposed to each other. Legal equality means we are all equally punishable under the legal law, and have no right to use, act under, or invoke the moral law (God). Freedom of religion is intolerable to a man of God, for the Law of Nature never changes. The Law of Nature (God) is not religion. Religion is part of man’s creation, not God’s. And once you see them for what they are, you suddenly lose all tolerance and respect for them. Only the law they created to control us, to cause us to harm one another instead of loving each other — only the delusion of their artifice of esteem and legal, class-based status protects them from us… only the illusion they cast:

–=–

You want proof of our equality, that poverty and despotism is colorblind, then go to your local homeless shelter. Go to your local tent city. Go to your local food locker. See the equality oozing from the disenfranchised and start doing something to change it. Or are you too good for that lower class… kinda like _they_ are too good for your class? Go tell those “white” people that they have “white” privilege and see what happens! These bodies politic (incorporated “People”) were created not as legal entities but as a stock of people related by blood. Their created nations are designed to hold not their own stock, but the common live-stock of we gentiles (goyim), that is, we that are born into the heathen, idolatrous nations. Have we forgotten that the very concept of the various immigration policies of every country in the world are based on race (family) connection to that people (State)? Are we just going to ignore that the whole purpose of the war and creation of modern Israel was for the sole purpose of created a homeland for “Jews” and that this means that Palestinians (Arabs) therefore were displaced because of their “race” and ethnicity, as a bloodline not considered “Jewish” and therefore supposedly impure (not white, not pure-blooded, not uncorrupted)? Are we supposed to reconsider what it is to be “Mexican” or “English” or “Indian” because that is now a racist title, let alone not be allowed to consider that many diseases are exclusive to certain races (bloodlines)? Should all True cultures be vanquished to make room for… Ah, globalism. Now it’s starting to make sense. Global dystopia, Orwellian style. United Nations are really just united goy – one big melting pot of Godless heathens without any foundation of family values living without any natural moral compass. What happens when, instead of being a natural (uncontrollable) occurrence and inevitably natural (God-given) order of species, the word _race_ is used instead as a shallow excuse for illicit, bad behavior? What happens when moral men cannot defend what they have built, both physically and spiritually, to protect themselves from immoral men of either the same or a different race if they (we) are forced to tolerate everything that is intolerable and opposed to the continued survival and success of the fruit of their combined labors? What happens when one can no longer be effective in ones communication when even his words are considered as racist, sexist, or intolerable merely because they have a masculine, authoritative tone behind them? The answer to these questions is apparent in most nations today, not the least of which are the North American ones. For the first time in history, the concept of race (bloodline and recorded familial genealogy) is being treated as an evil, as if racial differences both cultural and genetic simply don’t exist… except, that is, for the “royal” families This cultural neutering must be accompanied by national and now global tolerance, not only of cultural differences but specifically of absolutely opposing laws, until no moral (unwritten) law or notion of public decency is left. In other words, the only people left over, those that are not tolerated by this newly conditioned society of universal tolerance, are those that espouse any form of moral outrage, moral law, or other values that infringe upon the legal “human” rights of the most immoral of men. Our right to possess and exhibit a moral character in society will not be tolerated. Morality is racism. Family values are akin to xenophobia. Spirituality is a thought crime. Equality is artificially induced by legal law at birth, not by knowledge or actions. Solidarity in tolerance requires intolerance of all dissent, of all freedom of thought, and of all respect for difference. Tolerance is active ignorance of what should by all rights not be tolerated. And we are experiencing these facts in everything from music, art, and media to the corruption of medical, scientific, and intellectualist Babel that is killing and maiming us in droves every day. Here’s Michael Moore, whose own American immigrant genealogy includes a forefather that was a white slave brought to America from a European prison, speaking in absolute lunacy about whatever he is pretending to perceive “the white guy” and “white men” to be. We are being indoctrinated by these societal-actors to hate ourselves, to become intolerable towards our own people, our own rich history, and to revision ourselves as oppressors instead of being equally oppressed as all other men, and regardless of the color of our skin. This is the ultimate example of profiteering off of race-baiting, a well-orchestrated deceit used by those in power to keep it in the family (bloodline). And perhaps most disturbing is the audience

response!

—=—

The promotion of “racism” is nothing if not the induction of men into a culture of self-hatred. As a deleterious label placed on moral men defending their family honor and values, Zionist and other race-driven influencers, propagandists, and race-baiters have proven this fallacious term “racist” in whatever form it is implemented to be an invaluable and destructive weapon that, in the war of public opinion, wins by default every time. Why? Because ignorance is strength, and the public is swimming in a very large and controlled vat of induced, tolerated, active ignorance. If the messenger can be destroyed by such labels as _antisemite_ or _racist_, then communism in whatever form it dresses up as wins every time. But isn’t that exactly what was portrayed by those screaming crowds of common heathens in Nineteen Eighty-four in their idolatrous worship of their glorious leader (false god)? Do you think worshiping Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump is not idolatry? Of course it is! And its exactly what is expected from we, the goyim. How does one separate anciently engrained cultures from the races of men that have continuously practiced them, when the very conception of that culture has everything to do with race (bloodline)? The answer is that you can’t, for all cultures and systems of law and religion are unique to race, save that Law which is taught by Jesus Christ. But this law is not one of tolerance or acceptance, but one of privacy, of remaining foreign from men and cultures and nations that are exactly what we have all become, common pagans in idol worship of false gods and followers of other doctrines (i.e. man’s legal systems of law). These cultures cannot be mixed. They are by their nature unique and necessarily exclusive from all others. That which opposes a foundational culture and system of law cannot be integrated together and somehow remain uncorrupted or uninfluenced by the other. The very nature of any culture is assimilation of all others. In other words, one is expected to adapt and follow whatever culture and legal law system he or she emigrates into. But this is only true of the goyim, those that are enslaved by the false freedom (legal franchise) of citizenship to a some nation (corporation), that is, idolatry to a false (legal) god (ruler by blood inheritance). And by definition any and every culture, system of law, and religion is defined by its uniqueness, its INTOLERANCE of all others. Without these differences, this foundational, integrated opposition of all cultures to all others, there would be no reason for them to exist, just as there is no purpose for the existence of legal (manmade/written) law except to specifically stand against the moral, spiritual, unwritten Law of Nature (God) as expressed in the Bible and other scriptures (books of spiritual, moral law). In other words, the goal of universal tolerance is to destroy all culture, all religion, all law, and all spirituality steeped in morality, so as to cause the inception of a singular, completely amoral, intolerable global society called as globalism… a new world (secularist) order. But again, because we have been made actively ignorant of this ancient Latin word secular (translated as the artificial, commercial world of men, not of God, not of Nature), we have no idea how to fight the implementation of this _New World Order_ so often projected in science fiction dystopias like Orwell’s and Huxley’s. Because the Latin word _seclorum_ in the phrase printed on every dollar bill is translated as “world” instead of its actual meaning of “secular,” most folks do not understand that this new world (secular) order is nothing more or less than a total destruction of all spiritual concepts, belief systems, and moral actions (self-government) by men. Because we have lost knowledge of the fact that the Bible is the foundation of common law in America and in the European countries (holders of the ultimate, true “racism” attributed to the genealogically derived royal families and their blood-lines of succession), there is no referential left to us that we may fight this global secularism with that which it is opposed to. Secularism is diametrically opposed to the Bible, or in other words, legalism (written law) is absolutely opposed to the moral, unwritten, Bible Law. In a totally secular order, no spirituality or moral thought or right will be tolerated. This secular toleration of all things anti-moral is the end game of this modern, universal tolerance we are all both passively and actively accepting, acting in, and pretending to love — loving that which we should hate, as the Bible warns we shall time and again in our participation and respect of “worldly” deprivation, leading to our ultimate self-destruction. We are tolerating our own demise. We are at this point tolerating an Orwellian nightmare without even a whimper, for to speak out against tolerance will not be tolerated by the intolerable promoters of universal, secularist tolerance. You know what I have finally come to understand? It’s a real ballbuster. The truth is that almost every public attack, every so-called hate crime, every theft and every assault, every shooting, public education, blood-sport, assault and murder… these are all racist. Why? Because one generally does not attack and steal from

one’s own family.

Acceptance of what is a known evil is surrender from what is self-evidently good. Tolerance is intolerance. War is peace because we peacefully tolerate war. Freedom is slavery because we freely tolerate slavery. Ignorance is strength because we strongly tolerate ignorance. Through ignorance, slavery, and war (which are falsely called as knowledge, freedom, and peace) we will be destroyed through our own tolerance of intolerable things, our love of what we should hate, our acceptance of that which we should not accept, our value in that which holds no actual value, until that which we have so long tolerated destroys us through intolerance of good, moral men — just like any host allows a parasite to devour it because the parasite utterly controls the thoughts of the host. The only difference is that we are passively volunteering to be devoured. One last thing… to those playing the “racist” game, using this term so openly and without reserve to describe all the ills that have befallen you, I want you to stop and consider something for a moment. Perhaps you are being treated exactly how you are treating other men? Perhaps you are experiencing the Law of Nature, that is, that you should expect to be treated as you treat others? Perhaps your problem is that you are just being an asshole and so are being treated like one? And perhaps somewhere along the way you’ve simply mistaken the response of people to your being an asshole with racism? Perhaps your demand for equality would be better taken if, instead of invoking how different you are based on your race by saying others are racist, you actually treated everyone with respect, the way you want to be

treated?

Or maybe you’re right… Maybe it is racism that makes you an asshole in the first place. Either way, isn’t it time to overcome what you now know to be a totally bullshit logical fallacy and start being what you want others to be toward you? Perhaps you can do something about all the bad in your life by invoking the good in yourself and the people around you that you blame for your own disposition? Because, I have to be honest here, every time I hear you claim that racism is the reason for your self-created problems, I can’t help but consider that the only racist in the room is he that claims to be a victim of it. Besides, if you are so proud of your race (family), which you should be, what possible thing can I say or do to change that genealogical bloodline connection? Answer: not a damn thing. If you want to end what you perceive to be racism, then you will necessarily be required to start behaving in a way that doesn’t invoke culture or race. You will have to give up your cultural heritage and act exactly how those elitist bloodsuckers want you to act… like the rest of us white debt-slaves. Moral of the story: stop being assholes to each other.

.

–Clint > richardson (realitybloger.wordpress.com) –Wednesday, August 14st, 2019

7 Comments

by realitybloger

on _August

14, 2019_  •  Permalink Posted in Racism Is A Lie

,

Uncategorized

Tagged 1984 , aristotle

, bible lesson

, chew

bubblegum and kick ass

,

clint richardson realitybloger

,

hate crime , hate

speech law ,

huxley brave new world

,

nineteen eighty-four

,

orwell 1984 ,

plato , queen of

england ,

race card , Racism

, racism in america

, racist

, racist quotes

, red pill

sunday school

,

royal family ,

the corporation nation

,

They live preacher

, they

live tv , they

live we sleep

,

tolerance , trump

acting racist

, trump

is racist

_Posted by realitybloger on August 14, 2019_ https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2019/08/14/orwells-new-law-intolerance-is-tolerance/ LETHAL INJECTION PART 2 COMING SOON

–=–

“WHEN MEN DIFFER, BOTH SIDES OUGHT TO EQUALLY BE HEARD BY THE PUBLIC, FOR WHEN TRUTH AND ERROR HAVE FAIR PLAY, THE FORMER IS ALWAYS AN OVERMATCH FOR THE LATTER.” _–Benjamin Franklin_

–=–

Greetings programs… Here is the first teaser trailer for my new audio/video

book/documentary.

They know… Congress is well-aware that doctors (through prescription

and medical error)

are openly shown to actually be the #1 killer of Americans.

–=–

Please note that this is a new youtube channel, created for the purposes of my new radio shows and for trailers for this audio/visual book. I doubt very much the final video will be allowed to be posted and played without being censored, and so please keep this channel handy for updates and to learn how to receive this video offline (free and not for profit), most likely on a thumb drive that you can pass

out in activism.

About the project: I’m trying something new. This is not your typical movie or documentary, it is in fact a resource book designed to be listened to and watched, an 40? hour audio/visual experience not before attempted as far as I know, and therefore breaking all the rules of brainwashing and control that keeps us dumbed down through 10 minute memes and popular culture. It will make you laugh and cry, like seeing the (secular) world for the first time. This is a book that you don’t have to read because I’m reading all of their studies and information to you. It is a PHD course in medicine and pharmaceuticals, eugenics (now “genetics”) and its source in university syndicalism and their patents, chemical/biological weapons, drugs in the military, the truth about the proven effects of toxic metals as ingredients and adjuvants, and will prove without a doubt the connection of drugs and vaccines to all modern disease states, drugs impossible to acquire without a doctors prescription (iatrogenic/doctor-caused harm and death). It will expose the Truth behind a most heinous and extreme fallacious lie – THAT DOCTORS IN FACT DO NOT TAKE ANY OFFICIAL OATH TO DO NO HARM, and certainly not the Hypocritical oath. And it will show the history of doctors and nurses promoting every unhealthy, cancer-causing, recreational and illicit drug as a “cure-all” from cigarettes to methamphetamine, cocaine to speed, alcohol to canibus. Most importantly, this is an attempt to preserve the history of what is fallaciously labeled as the anti-vaccination movement, from its satiric beginnings against mandated vaccines with cow pus (pox) to its now almost completely censored attempts to educate and use science to help people make educated choices, and to prevent the same catastrophes caused by the mandated inoculations of the past. In the end, my intention is not only to end any debate about the harm caused by inoculation, but to place all the pieces of the puzzle into one undeniable, inarguable master class, revealing 100’s of their own studies and publicly unspoken knowledge of the well-documented harm (side-effects) they have caused, including all the players, good and evil, that complete the puzzle once and for all. In this way, I hope to preserve all the efforts of all of us that have publicly fought this fight and suffered the consequences and censorship of blowing the proverbial whistle. You’ll be shocked at what I’ve put together, and your suspicions will either be verified or disproven… or you will find the Truth to be much stranger than the fictions you’ve been led to believe. This project is the nuclear bomb to end this foolish world war of willful, institutionalized ignorance and outright, provable lies. Please help me to get this new youtube channel out there by sharing it and this blog, and either copying or embedding these trailers anywhere you can find them a willing home. Remember, no permission is required to copy, quote, use, and repost my works, ever. The working, most likely final title? Exactly what it is: _LETHAL INJECTION: A CORRUPTION OF BLOOD_

Thanks to all,

.

–Clint > richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com) –Saturday, August 2nd, 2019 (on the artificial roman timeline)

9 Comments

by realitybloger

on _August

3, 2019_  •  Permalink Posted in Death By Medicine

,

Hypocritical Oath

,

Iatrogenic Medicine

,

Lethal Injection 2

,

Vaccination

, War On

Drugs ,

Your Parents Drug Addiction Tagged clint richardson documentary

,

death by doctor

, doctors

kill , drugs

, eugenics movement

, genetics

is eugenics

,

iatrogenic death rate

,

Lethal Injection The Story Of Vaccination

,

strawman story

, the

corporation nation

_Posted by realitybloger on August 3, 2019_ https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2019/08/03/lethal-injection-part-2-coming-soon/ THANK YOU FOR YOUR HELP! Updated 12:25am, 12/30/19 Thank you so much to those that sent donations (gifts). I almost teared up when I hesitantly opened my email tonight and saw that so many of you had responded so quickly. You’ve no idea how motivating and spiritually uplifting that was, and how good it is to know people still care out there. I reached my goal and more. That said, if this has caused anyone hardship to help me please let me know privately. I’m leaving the original email as posted below for context and for those that wish to listen to my last radio show and know what I’m up

to.

No more donations needed, so please support those in need.

Thank you.

-Clint

———————————————————————– Greetings programs… As you know by now, I avoid at all costs asking for money unless I am in need. Today, I am appealing to you to make a small donation at the link to the right so that I might purchase a cheap laptop computer and the industry standard program Microsoft Word. Why am I asking now? Firstly, for my own health. I have been lingering in my windowless basement for years now like a hermit monk, researching, writing, etc., and my health has suffered for it. If for no other reason than my sanity, I really need to be able to write and draw inspiration from that which ironically is most often the subject of my expositions — Nature, the sun, freedom from being plugged-in. Secondly, I would like to start doing short, subject-based radio shows again, as well as having a tool to conduct interviews for my newest audio/visual-book/documentary, which I have been working on for many months, and which, as always, I am able to offer freely without charge. To get an idea about just what this upcoming project is, you can listen to my last interview with Anne Blake Tracy, someone I would very much like to interview (in Arizona) for the film, which I really need a portable computer for. You’ll understand why her contribution, her piece(s) of the puzzle is integral when you hear

this:

LINK–> https://archive.org/details/clintondeannajune292019 And thirdly, I am taking part of my book series and trying to write up a book proposal, to which I need M. Word. I’m serving little purpose anymore being shadow-banned, hacked, and generally snubbed by that false “movement” that would rather thrive on its own patriotic mythos and romantic lies than seek the Truth at all costs. To reach people, I will therefore try and get a literary agent and get published. All other works and films and radio will remain free and unpublished. Hopefully an agent can help break the barriers set up to keep people like me in the shadows and help me book engagements and debates, etc. Any advice, suggestions, or help to this end are

appreciated.

To anyone that contributes at least $20 to my goal in the next week or two, I will (hopefully) send a free, signed copy of any future book I manage to ever get published, if that happens. I’ve nothing else to offer, really. The book will be called “Gleaming The Matrix” with a subtitle about “Simulacrum and Simulation”. It will be a re-write and comparison of _The Matrix_ movie (a metaphor for our collective hypocrisy) with the book it largely was based on by Jean

Baudrillard.

To those that have supported my works in the past, I thank you sincerely and humbly. If I haven’t thanked you before on a personal level, please know that when in the middle of a project I have only that one purpose driving my life, and that my gratitude is greater than you can imagine, as your gifts allow me to have the greatest job in the world, my own, without compromise. This means everything to me. I would like to raise about $400 if possible, which would allow the purchase of a bare bones pc and the program needed. If or when I reach that goal, I’ll update this post to reflect my gratitude and then take the post down shortly after. They say a mind is a terrible thing to waste. So I leave my fate in

your hands…

Thank you,

.

–Clint > richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com) –Monday, July 29th, 2019

17 Comments

by realitybloger

on _July

29, 2019_  •  Permalink

Posted in Help!

Tagged Help!

_Posted by realitybloger on July 29, 2019_ https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2019/07/29/i-need-your-help/ THE NEW OLD – DISCOVERING THE COVERINGS OF ALT HISTORY There are many memes supporting what seems to be a mass of interconnected false paradigms floating around in the minds of men today, many of which are designed to alter or outright change the perception of what we helplessly pretend and call as _history_. You know, his story? The story told of our own story… From the Origin of Man to Fomenko’s Tartarian paradise to flat earth sophistry to the forever improvable religion of science known as the big bang, there is obviously a concerted effort, if not to merely hide the mythos of cultural, political, and scientific history, to utterly destroy its perspective relationship to the current state of international and religious affairs. And why not? What dictator, what royal family, and what challenger to such elitist tyranny would not want to put forward a historical timeline from which the tyrant justifies his current tyranny? Wasn’t it Orwell that so self-evidently stated _h__e who controls the past, controls the future; and he who controls the present, controls the past_? For today, let us simply address just one of these man-made creators of mythos, the fictionality of Anatolii Fomenko. I have made my own opinions on what is history and why it can never be trusted clear on this blog and in my book, with the exception being only the laws and opinions contained within the primary sources of the time. For example, the history of America’s pioneering of organized, legalized, state-sanctioned Eugenics can be found in the annals of Supreme Court decisions on forced sterilizations and within the records of the University system from which it was first given traction. We may also know the true nature of the past when presidents and prime ministers are finally apt to apologize for their government’s past actions; for instance the many chemical and biological weapons testing done against unwitting populations. The victims, as the intended receivers of such lame apologies done only after the statute of limitations takes effect or after those involved are already dead, are certainly primary evidence of what can be called

true history.

But when it comes to the types of fallacious, mythological, patriotic, and ironically detailed stories told for the purpose of justifying the current role and intolerable actions of the modern ruling elite, we should never fool ourselves that these stories of history exist for any other reason than to foment the continued existence of the illegitimate inheritance of the fruit of those historical tales, which of course are perpetually granted to the offspring of those historical characters. The Queen in right, the presidents and prime ministers and congresses that are her direct descended bloodline of cousins, and all those who, with unwavering nepotistical allegiance, follow in the glory of that family history, where all other 99.99% of the history of common men is ignored to showcase the few powerful criminals that supposedly invented and founded the kingdoms, nations, religions, and legal systems of law that we allow them to govern us with today. After all, it is the current, corrupt bloodline of elitist men that was shat out of the inheritable rectum of their forefathers that control the present by preserving the past so as to ensure the future control of that offspring which shall equally be shat from their own rectums. After all, they certainly cannot be the rulers of men without the inculturation and indoctrination of their own historical narrative, the very lame and fragile justification presented to us all so that we are made to actually believe that their fictional, unjustifiable power structure is_ just the way it is_. History, me thinks, is the greatest excuse for both action and inaction ever invented by men. We are controlled by the institutionalized, exaggerated lies that make up the past just as our children will be controlled by the predictably programed future presented to us by those that continue by birth-right to control the present. Worst of all, we lie to ourselves, using this false pretense of narrative, political history as our own excuse, to pretend our own moral hands are tied, justifying our passive place in the hierarchical mid to low order, pretending we are not voluntarily participating in and even loving our servitude to that upper class and

their schema.

The mental state that we all currently occupy in our volutnary, collective obedience to what history apparently has birthed for us was penned and politically planned for us well before any story of America was born. For the conspired brokerage of power is not new to history, and the common man is doomed to repeat history not because he doesn’t study it, but because he passively ignores it. This ignorance manifests its ugly head in every generation, based on both the promise and the possession of the benefits of voluntary participation, voluntary servitude to that which bestows such flattering titles, artificial rights and benefits, and the artificial status of socioeconomics. Love of money. We are lost to history by voluntarily relinquishing our place in it, for the writers of history only include those tales of men whose actions are either favorable to their own continued power brokerage or whom are against it, for every hero needs a villain, even the state. Government has no purpose without the enemies it must create and continuously alienate to justify its militarized armies and police. The _politics of obedience_

are nothing new…

—=—

“Poor, wretched, and stupid peoples, NATIONS DETERMINED ON YOUR OWN MISFORTUNE AND BLIND TO YOUR OWN GOOD! You let yourselves be deprived before your own eyes of the best part of your revenues; your fields are plundered, your homes robbed, your family heirlooms taken away. YOU LIVE IN SUCH A WAY THAT YOU CANNOT CLAIM A SINGLE THING AS YOUR OWN; AND IT WOULD SEEM THAT YOU CONSIDER YOURSELVES LUCKY TO BE LOANED YOUR PROPERTY, YOUR FAMILIES, AND YOUR VERY LIVES. All this havoc, this misfortune, this ruin, descends upon you not from alien foes, but from the one enemy whom you yourselves render as powerful as he is, for whom you go bravely to war, for whose greatness you do not refuse to offer your own bodies unto death. He who thus domineers over you has only two eyes, only two hands, only one body, no more than is possessed by the least man among the infinite numbers dwelling in your cities; HE HAS INDEED NOTHING MORE THAN THE POWER THAT YOU CONFER UPON HIM TO DESTROY YOU. Where has he acquired enough eyes to spy on you, if you do not provide them yourselves? How can he have so many arms to beat you with, if he does not borrow them from you? The feet that trample down your cities, where does he get them if they are not your own? HOW DOES HE HAVE ANY POWER OVER YOU EXCEPT THROUGH YOU? HOW WOULD HE DARE ASSAIL YOU IF HE HAD NO COOPERATION FROM YOU? WHAT COULD HE DO TO YOU IF YOU YOURSELVES DID NOT CONNIVE WITH THE THIEF WHO PLUNDERS YOU, IF YOU WERE NOT ACCOMPLICES OF THE MURDERER WHO KILLS YOU, IF YOU WERE NOT TRAITORS TO YOURSELVES? You sow your crops in order that he may ravage them, YOU INSTALL AND FURNISH YOUR HOMES TO GIVE HIM GOODS TO PILLAGE; you rear your daughters that he may gratify his lust; you bring up your children in order that he may confer upon them the greatest privilege he knows – to be led into his battles, to be delivered to butchery, to be made the servants of his greed and the instruments of his vengeance; you yield your bodies unto hard labor in order that he may indulge in his delights and wallow in his filthy pleasures; YOU WEAKEN YOURSELVES IN ORDER TO MAKE HIM THE STRONGER AND THE MIGHTIER TO HOLD YOU IN CHECK. From all these indignities, such as the very beasts of the field would not endure, YOU CAN DELIVER YOURSELVES IF YOU TRY, NOT BY TAKING ACTION, BUT MERELY BY WILLING TO BE FREE. RESOLVE TO SERVE NO HANDS UPON THE TYRANT TO TOPPLE HIM OVER, BUT SIMPLY THAT YOU SUPPORT HIM NO LONGER; then you will behold him, like a great Colossus whose pedestal has been pulled away, fall of his own weight and break into pieces?” “…LET US THEREFORE ADMIT THAT ALL THOSE THINGS TO WHICH HE IS TRAINED AND ACCUSTOMED SEEM NATURAL TO MAN AND THAT ONLY THAT IS TRULY NATIVE TO HIM WHICH HE RECEIVES WITH HIS PRIMITIVE, UNTRAINED INDIVIDUALITY. THUS CUSTOM BECOMES THE FIRST REASON FOR VOLUNTARY SERVITUDE. MEN ARE LIKE HANDSOME RACE HORSES WHO FIRST BITE THE BIT AND LATER LIKE IT, AND REARING UNDER THE SADDLE A WHILE SOON LEARN TO ENJOY DISPLAYING THEIR HARNESS AND PRANCE PROUDLY BENEATH THEIR TRAPPINGS. SIMILARLY MEN WILL GROW ACCUSTOMED TO THE IDEA THAT THEY HAVE ALWAYS BEEN IN SUBJECTION, THAT THEIR FATHERS LIVED IN THE SAME WAY; THEY WILL THINK THEY ARE OBLIGED TO SUFFER THIS EVIL, AND WILL PERSUADE THEMSELVES BY EXAMPLE AND IMITATION OF OTHERS, FINALLY INVESTING THOSE WHO ORDER THEM AROUND WITH PROPRIETARY RIGHTS, BASED ON THE IDEA THAT IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN THAT WAY.” _—“The Politics Of Obedience: A Discourse On Voluntary Servitude,” by Etienne de La Boetie_

—=—

Custom is just another word for an appeal to history. But let us get back to the subject at hand… I am posting this entry upon my journey merely to help you, my fellow slave to history, to understand how historical revisionism is being played out before our eyes, and how easy it is to be duped by the power brokers of nations that seek to alter their own past so as to justify their future actions — despotism and tyranny in the name of

history.

And so today I simply wish to point you in the right direction, that you may find both the logic and reasons behind the historical revisionism coming from the Russian empire. For a while it has been hard not to hear of the exploits of one Anatolii Fomenko and the glorious revisionism of Tartary. As if the lost kingdom of Atlantas was suddenly discovered, Tartary is being promoted as its simulated surrogate. This alternative, revisionist effort to recreate history in Russia’s own image is a very interesting case study, believed by innocents and promoted as the new _truth_ by fools. But let us examine the purpose behind this revisioning by looking at just who in the present is attempting to control the past in order to rule in the

future.

For this, I pass on to you a book entitled: _History as Therapy: Alternative History and Nationalist Imaginings in Russia_, by Konstantin Sheiko and Stephen Brown, published May 1, 2014. I was fortunate enough to have found a link to this on a comment board a while back, the commenter I wish to thank and apologize for not being able to source here. That said, I will simply quote from the book and leave a link to a free version as an Ebook for those interested, while asking those with the ability to support the authors by purchasing the ebook if you decide to read and utilize it. I feel this is a very important work, especially for those feeling lost in the melee of historical nonsense and trickery being promoted by so many outlets. The book is described as such: This astonishing book explores the delusional imaginings of Russia’s past by the pseudo-scientific ‘Alternative History’ movement. Despite the chaotic collapse of two empires in the last century, Russia’s glorious imperial past continues to inspire millions. The lively movement of ‘Alternative History’, diligently re-writing Russia’s past and ‘rediscovering’ its hidden greatness, has been growing dramatically since the collapse of Communism in 1991. Virtually unknown in the West, these pseudo-historians have published best-selling books, attracted widespread media attention, and are a prominent voice in Internet discussions about Russian and world history. Alternative History claims that Russia is much older than Ancient Egypt, Greece and Rome; that the medieval Mongol Empire was in fact a Slav-Turk world empire; and that, in the twentieth century, duplicitous foreign powers stabbed Russia in the back and stole its empire. For its followers THE KEY TO RUSSIA’S GREATNESS IN THE FUTURE LIES IN ENSURING THAT RUSSIANS UNDERSTAND THE TRUE WEALTH OF THEIR PAST. Alternative history has become a popular therapy for Russians still coming to terms with the reality of Post-Soviet life. It is one of the forces shaping A NEW RUSSIAN NATIONALISM and an important factor in the geopolitics of the twenty-first century.

To purchase ebook:

https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=vY00DwAAQBAJ&rdid=book-vY00DwAAQBAJ&rdot=1&source=gbs_vpt_read&pcampaignid=books_booksearch_viewport Partially online here: https://books.google.com/books?id=vY00DwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&vq=PUTIN#v=onepage&q=PUTIN&f=false Turning first to page 41, with regard to Fomenko, we read the following, which is the end of Chapter Two, leading into the beginning

of Chapter Three:

—=—

Begin excerpt:

When Communism collapsed and the new Russian state was established in 1991, there were half-hearted attempts at galvanizing popular opinion around a new sense of what it meant to be Russian. President Yeltsin appointed and expert committee ‘to establish the true nature of Russia’, and newspapers offered prizes for ‘the best definition of Russianness’. Nonetheless, the 1990’s came and went without any clear answer from the state as to who the Russians were and what Russia stood for. Even Putin when he emerged as Yeltsin’s protege and likely successor in 1999 portrayed himself as a technocrat rather than as an ideologue. What Putin and his administration failed to develop was some sort of over-arching narrative to inspire popular support. As Graham Gill has put it, the presidential administrations of Yeltsin and Putin failed ‘to articulate a consistent narrative embodying a vision of either Russia’s future or of how it was to be constituted …. No presidential vision has become embedded in the public lore of the society’. Instead of a widely accepted ‘national idea’ that described Russia’s new circumstances and inspired enthusiasm among ordinary people, an ideological void emerged, which was soon filled by a cacophony of competing voices that ranged from Communists to ultra-nationalists, from the Orthodox Church to neo-Pagan occultists, and from Eurasianist empire builders to national separatists. Russia’s rulers soon came to fear that they might have built their new state upon the ideological equivalent of quicksand. It is this fear of having no firm historical foundation in place that lies behind the increasingly desperate efforts of Putin and his allies, from the mid 2000’s, to write a ‘usable history’ that explains and justifies the new post-Communist Russia. We get a sense of how important the post-Communist elites view the writing of history from the reflections of Putin himself. From Putin downwards, there is little patience with the multiplicity of views and competing interpretations that are the stock-in-trade of conventional history writing. In 2007, Putin told a gathering of schoolteachers that there was a need for a new primer in Russian History to overcome the confusion and errors contained in the dozens of school texts then in

use.

The result was a text credited to Fillipov that became notorious among its liberal critics for reinventing Stalin as an effective state builder who made occasional mistakes. The logic of this text implied that the authoritarian rather than the liberal rule worked best for Russia. Leon Aron has argued that Putin and his administration’s understanding of history can be summarized in two axioms: The first axiom appears to be this: although there were ‘mistakes’ and ‘dark spots’, what mattered was the survival and strengthening of the state–by whatever means necessary. And by that standard, the Soviet Union was a glittering success, and the costs were justified… the second axiom of modern Russian history according to Putin is that the Soviet Union was a ‘besieged fortress’, forever under the threat of attack by the West, and that the machinations of the West were responsible not only for Soviet foreign policy but also for a great deal of domestic misfortune. The overarching aim of this and all future historical narratives is the ‘normalization’ of the monstrosity of Soviet totalitarianism, the manufacture of justifications and excuses for its crimes. As Brandenberger has put it, Fillipov’s textbook did not explicitly rehabilitate Stalin, but rather established the justification for authoritarian rule. Russia’s survival depended upon a ‘500-year political tradition which demanded that power be concentrated in the hands of a single, autocratic ruler and his centralized administrative system’. Thus, Russian unity and strength from above will better safeguard Russian national interests than grassroots political parties, social movements, or civic organizations. In 2009, President Medvedev declared that Russia’s history had undergone a process of falsification during the 2000’s, and that in recent times the atacks from abroad had become more angry and aggressive. His answer to this problem was to establish the Presidential Commission of the Russian Federation to Counter Attempts to Falsify History to the Detriment of Russia’s Interests, which would operate from 15 May 2009 to 14 February 2012. Putin and Medvedev entrusted staunch allies from their political retinue with the task of fashioning this history. Key figures in these efforts are the Speaker of the Duma and Chairman of the Russian Historical Society, Segie Naryshkin, and the Minister of Culture and Chairman of the Russian Military-Historical Society, Vladimir Medinskii. The president of the Commission charged with protecting Russian history was Naryshkin. No doubt conscious of the accusations of Orwellian thought control that the Commission would attract, Naryshkin assured his listeners that his organization never intended to make historians speak with one voice. Instead, the Commission’s aim was to rebut the harmful propaganda that had been directed at Russia as a result of the rewriting of history in other countries. Like Fillipov’s textbook, Naryshkin’s commission signaled the regime’s intentions but did not immediately solve the problem. Obviously dissatisfied with the results of previous attempts to end the ‘porridge in the head’, the re-elected President Putin in 2013 outlined yet another attempt to establish a new historical regime. He ordered the Ministry of Education, the Russian Academy of Sciences, and the Historical Society to collaborate in producing textbooks without ‘contradictions and ambiguities’. The textbooks are expected to emphasis patriotism, Russian Orthodoxy, civic mindedness _(grazhdanstvennost), _the must ethnic nature of Russia, and its mighty civilizational and martial achievements. Happily, some of this work was already being undertaken at a popular level. Alternative history is much too radical to be embraced in full by government officials, let alone Putin. Yet, as we shall see, there is good reason for thinking that Putin and his ideologies are borrowing ideas from alternative history to pupulate their own hitherto dreary, unimaginative, and, often, absent narrative about what post-Communist Russia stands for. It is not too much to suggest that alternative history and regime propaganda are moving in the same direction, just at different speeds. Putin’s propagandists have recently discovered what has been well described in the scholarly literature as ‘civilizational nationalism’. Russia’s imperial restoration will need ideas and enthusiasm, and not just oil and gas, thus: The Kremlin’s canonization of the idea of a special thousand-year civilization that predetermines a ‘special path’ for Russia is gradually elevating to the rank of an official ‘one true doctrine’ to replace Marxism-Lenonism. An army of paid and unpaid propagandists are mining this vein of gold, turning a theory into a political

technology (art).

This ‘army of paid and unpaid propagandists’ contains a good many regiments of alternative historians and the readers with whom they are in conversation. Precisely because of its unabashed nationalism, alternative history has foreshadowed the type of ‘political technology’ that Putin and his administration is likely to deploy in order to resolve the complicated issue of Russian identity. A radicalized ethnographies-nationalism might yet shape public opinion in unpredictable ways, enhancing the potential for a new Russian Revolution. Tamed and harnessed, however, ‘civilizational nationalism’ may provide the glue that the present administration needs to maintain its grip on power. CHAPTER THREE: EMPIRE, NATION, NATIONALISM ‘THE MOST EFFECTIVE WAY TO DESTROY PEOPLE IS TO DENY AND OBLITERATE THEIR OWN UNDERSTANDING OF THEIR HISTORY.’

_–GEORGE ORWELL_

PART ONE: RUSSIA’S MULTIPLE IDENTITIES To make sense of alternative history, we first need to explore in more detail Russia’s identity crisis. Fomenko entitled his major work _Imperiia_ or Empire, a word that has much more positive connotations in Russia than it does in the West. Empire, for Fomenko and for many Russians, means the repository of political and economic power projected across a huge geographic era. This meaning is very different to Lenin’s concept of exploited and subjected colonial peoples. This positive view of the imperial past is reflected in the fact that the overwhelming majority of Russians have found it impossible to distinguish between Russia as nation-state and Russia as empire. Thus the term ‘nationalism’, in the context of Russia, is a problematic

one.

The growing vitality of nationalism has been one of the most remarked upon aspects of the post-Communist history of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. The context for Fomenko is the collapse in 1991 of the Soviet Union, the Communist state that more or less occupied the territory inherited from the Tsarist Empire. The Soviet Union’s principal successor state, the Russian Federation, is the world’s largest state even if it is only half the size of its Communist and Tsarist predecessors. Politically and geographically, modern Russia occupies the same space today as it did approximately three hundred years ago in the era of Peter the Great. Since the collapse of Communism, Russian intellectuals and political commentators have sought out solid ground in order to make sense of Russia’s new geography and its diminished place in the hierarchy of the world’s

great powers…

As for why alternative historians have made such fantastic claims about Russia, it must be remembered that Russian alternative history is in competition with the alternative history of other national groups. The writers under consideration in this book have found themselves in a contest with their counterparts in Ukraine, Central Asia, and the Turkic peoples within the Russian Federation. Popular, as distinct from state-inspired, chauvinism was frowned upon in Tsarist and Soviet times. Only in the last two decades has nationalism become part of a public conversation about the merits of rival ethnic histories. As Shnirelman has put it: For people who believe they have been deprived of their cultural legacy, invention of the past becomes a powerful instrument–first, for the raising of self-esteem and the re-evaluation of their position among other peoples, and second, for demanding special rights and privileges with respect to others who lack their glorious past… Since the 1980’s, a huge literature has developed around terms such as patriotism, nations, and nationalism. Patriotism seems less problematic and can be defined as strongly positive feelings towards one’s homeland. As for the term ‘nation’, Hobsbawm distinguishes between the nation as citizenship, ‘in which the nation consists of collective sovereignty based in common political participation’, and the nation as ethnicity, ‘in which the nation comprises all those of supposedly common language, history, or broader cultural identity. Gellner came up with the most enduring definition of nationalism itself when he wrote that ‘Nationalism is primarily a political principle which holds that the political and the national unit should be congruent’. While definitions are important, assigning ethnic groups to a particular homeland has proved more challenging… After Peter, it took another century for Russian rulers to formulate an official vision of what Russia was. Under Tsar Nicholas the First and his Minister for Education, Uvarov, the trinity of ‘Autocracy, Orthodoxy and Narodnost’ was coined. Narodnost is deliberately vague in the way it evokes a bond between the peoples of Russia and the land they occupy. It was in effect an antidote to nations within the Russian empire seeking their own states. Its aim was to bind the people of Russia together by suggesting that they were special and morally superior to the West…

End Excerpt.

_–Earlier in the book, from page 14, we read:_

Begin Excerpt.

In the immediate aftermath of the collapse of Communism, Russian universities were in an especially parlous economic position. In the 1990’s, history writing, like the Russian state itself, entered a state of flux. The erstwhile conformism of Soviet academia collapsed from within as some historians defended the Communist past, others became trenchant critics of the former regime, and the majority looked anxiously to see which way the political wind was blowing. Their Western counterparts were keen to investigate and publish materials relating to the more sensational aspects of the Soviet period such as the Stalinist purges. But in Russia and the West, there was only a limited market for scholarly ruminations on arcane controversies connected to Russias ancient and medieval past. It was into this virtually empty space that alternative historians, led by the likes of the New Chronology movement of Anatolii Fomenko and Gleb Nosovskii, ventured. Fomenko (1945-) is a renouned mathematician who has belonged to the academic staff of Moscow State University since the Soviet era. He is a member of Russia’s Academy of Sciences, a professor with a doctorate in applied physics and mathematics, head of the Mechanical-Mathematical Department of Moscow State University, and author of more than one hundred and eighty scientific works. He has written dozens of well-respected monographs and textbooks in his specialist field of mathematics. Fomenko was awarded Russia’s State Award in 1996 for his scientific achievements. The qualifications of Nosovskii (1958-) include a PhD in physics and mathematics. More notoriously, they are the authors of more than one hundred publications dealing with Russian and world history. The volume of their output is astonishing and reflects both of their enthusiasm and their mass-production methods as different members of their team specialize in different periods and locations. Since the collapse of Communism, New Chronology has thrived as a publishing phenomenon, despite and partly because of the hefty criticisms directed at it from conventional scholars. It has become better known in the West too, attracting the attention of scholars who are concerned about its impact upon ordinary Russians’ understanding of history and Russia’s place in the world. The English language title of Fomenko’s magnum opus is _History: Fiction or Science_. Fomenko’s ambition is to replace the existing ‘fiction’ with the ‘science’ of alternative history. Fomenko and New Chronology represent a popular rebellion against the version of history preferred by Russia’s scholarly elite. Or, as one scholar has put it, New Chronology is a prime example of ‘the conjunction between conspiracy theory and the rewriting of history makes up one of the main instruments for disseminating nationalist theories in today’s Russia, theories based on a kind of post-modern, paranoid cultural

imaginary.

The number of critics of Fomenko and his fellow alternative historians has certainly grown in recent years, and there have been premature announcements of New Chronology’s imminent demise. Yet alternative history has shown a remarkable capacity to absorb the blows inflicted by its critics and move forward, its momentum enhanced rather than deflated. So far, alternative history has not succeeded in winning over the academic departments of major universities, nor has it replaced the existing school textbooks. The alternative strategy is not to outscore the professional historians in a debate of a particular controversy or time period. Rather, the plan is to render conventional scholarship irrelevant by winning over the book-buying public and Russia’s growing army of internet users. Their passion is expressed in their apocalyptic version of patriotism for, in the words of one alternative historian: When a nation maintains her historical memory, she will fight not only for material values, but also for the honor of the state _(derzhava_)… But if this nation is forced to abandon traditional national values and substitute instead a set of alien principles, then this nation is like a giant that was defeated not by the sword, but poisoned with a substance that darkens the mind and paralyses the

will.

–End Excerpt

—=—

What would a nation, an empire, be without its historical source and reason for existence? The answer to this question is always the same – the more force that is used against the common people signifies the further away from its original purpose and ideals the empire has gotten. In America, we are under military rule, martial law, via the invocation of war powers (emergency) and the subsequent soft suspension of the constitution. We are made to believe we live in independent states just as in colonial history, that we are actually part of the state we live in instead of just foreign US residents, yet we are all birthed into the nation, into Washington DC, a district wholly outside and foreign to any of the 50 individual States. The union is no longer controlled by the States, the States are controlled by the empire corporation called “United States”, seated outside of and foreign to any State. Yet the appeal to the romantic history of the original thirteen colonies-turned-States after their war and struggle for independence is all we hear about, a false narrative used to justify the exact tyranny and oppression of a federal government that the King of England possessed while using the Crown’s appeal to its own history and right to rule over the corporations (colonies) set up by it. The Russian Federation (federal government district) is, to its various member states, not at all dissimilar to what the United States federal government is to the 50 states United – an illegitimate (de facto) dictator. In other words, every present-day nation is an appeal to history. Every revolution is an appeal to history. Every law is an appeal to history. Every elected and appointed official is an appeal to history. The political process is an appeal to history. If you ask the president of the United States what makes his flattering title and dictatorial war powers legitimate, he will say “the people”. If you ask the people the same question, they will make an appeal to history — he was voted in at some point and that’s the way it has been since before I was born. That’s how the system works. Really? I’m sure lab rats and zoo animals think the same exact thing while rotting in the cages they were born in…

—=—

“THE MOST SUCCESSFUL TYRANNY IS NOT THE ONE THAT USES FORCE TO

ASSURE UNIFORMITY

BUT THE ONE THAT REMOVES THE AWARENESS OF OTHER POSSIBILITIES, THAT MAKES IT SEEM INCONCEIVABLE THAT OTHER WAYS ARE VIABLE, THAT REMOVES THE SENSE THAT THERE IS AN OUTSIDE.” _–Allan Bloom, “The Closing of the American Mind”_

—=—

Of course, every nation has its own, personalized history, a justification for its current and future existence linked inextricably to the past. Therefore, each kingdom must balance itself ever so carefully upon the lies that constitute each individually perspective history of the multiplicity of demented, endlessly providential, manifest destiny attributed to every empire. And _God_ is always somehow on the side of every nation, a petty excuse on the Grandest of scales for inexcusable actions in both war and peace, which also means that God is at the same time against every nation too — the paradox of a false attribution to the empty idols of deity — many nations under and over their own version of _God_… I imagine that, at the time when the American civil war was ending, the empire of the federal United States under its illegitimate emergency war powers, which had just decimated half of its own unionized states to the south, must have had a very similar crisis of conscious about their own perceived history, and likely had the same conversations about conserving the good, reimagining the bad, and essentially reinventing United States history to justify their own federalized, standing army so demonized in the Declaration of Independence. _Let’s say it was a war over slavery… yeah, that’s it, we had to free the slaves! We’ll be heroes! And the common, illiterate dupes will never know the difference… _ But the greatest takeaway from this is in the term itself: _alternative history_. If history were true in the first place, there could be no alternative. Truth, you see, has no alternative. It’s the truth. You cannot have two differing (alternative) truths about the same thing. And so I stress again that history is never truth, but only the empire’s foundational propaganda that seeks to justify the purpose of its modern and future (post-modern) existence. But there’s an even darker side to history. You see, the history of nations, being the story of each nation’s purpose to exist, is always a sociopath. The history of each nation is as the Narcissus admiring its own reflection, warring against any enemy that might cause ripples in the clear historical view of itself. Revisionist history is like breaking the vanity mirror of ones false appearance, like wiping the lipstick from a pig, for every nation loves only itself while hiding behind imaginary borders, fictitious lines drawn in imaginary sand that pretendedly say _do not cross_. Indeed, history is not merely a story told, it is the very identity of all false existence. History is always the past, and he that controls the past controls the future. The future is everything after history, including most parts of the more recent past. One has to wonder what could possibly keep the United States empire and union of states together if it weren’t for the viral history of Philadelphia and the continental congress. Viral history… it’s like a disease. It prevents betterment. It ensures nepotism, and subsequently, despotism. And, like any other corporation out there that had humble beginnings, where we meagerly, obsucrely came from is and always will be the greatest tool of manipulation possible. History represents the success stories of empire, the fish story no one in their right mind and reason should believe in. For history is never truth. It simply cannot be. Nothing made by men is natural. Nothing invented by man is truth. And truth cannot be revisioned… unless, that is, you call it _history_. Now imagine if suddenly, instead of existing to please the historical narrative, we acted as if the reason and purpose for our existence is to ensure the future? Imagine if we lived for a better tomorrow, instead of using yesterday to justify our God-awful actions of today? Imagine if history did not dictate the present, and that, therefore, the future was something other than ensuring the continuity of government, or in other words, insuring the new feudalism of modern empire will continue into tomorrow. Imagine what you could do to serve others, to live for the purpose of preserving Life and the Source of Life, the highest Law, instead of merely preserving the emptiness of history’s inventions, the despotism of empire. History can only ever be the popular alternative to truth. Here’s one for the road… Now there’s revolution… but they don’t know what they’re

fighting…

—=—

.

Clint > richard-son (Realitybloger.wordpress.com) Thursday, July 18, 2019

14 Comments

by realitybloger

on _July

18, 2019_  •  Permalink Posted in Anatolii Fomenko Tagged Anatolii Fomenko

, fake

history , fake

news , identity

politics ,

national identity

,

nationalism ,

New , New Chronology

, Putin

, Revisionist History

,

Russian history

, Soviet

Union

_Posted by realitybloger on July 18, 2019_ https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2019/07/18/the-new-old-discovering-the-coverings-of-alt-history/ MONTY PYTHON ENDED THE GENDER IDENTITY DEBATE IN 1979 Scene from ‘Life Of Brian’

–=–

Couldn’t help myself… but this 2 minute clip is both an incredibly accurate foreshadowing and a complete deconstruction and utter defeat of the gender identity meme. Either that, or _they_ had this ridiculousness planned for ages and predictively programmed into us as such for a very, very, VERY long

time.

Whatever the case, this is brilliance in the art of satire. So funny it hurts… like the Truth often does. New article coming very soon on race-baiting and the racism fallacy and meme, and what it’s really about…

.

–Clint > richard-son (realitybloger.wordpress.com) –Monday, April 26th, 2019 (Roman Timeline)

3 Comments

by realitybloger

on _April

26, 2019_  •  Permalink Posted in Monty Python On Gender Debate Tagged gender bender

, gender

identity ,

gender pronouns

, gender

rights ,

gender-bending

, identity

politics ,

pronoun hell

_Posted by realitybloger on April 26, 2019_ https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2019/04/26/monty-python-ended-the-gender-identity-debate-in-1979/ STRAWMAN: VOLUME II: REPLACING “GOD” WITH “LOGOS” – THE MOST UNHOLY, LOGICAL FALLACY _***This post is a modified section of my next (2nd) “Strawman” book series, sitting at almost 200,000 words, which is between 75-100% larger than the average, fictional novel or overtly-flattering biography or historical tale of mostly fiction-based happenstance and fallacious rhetoric. Funny, for you will gladly pay to be knowingly lied to by storytellers, by film-makers, by self-proclaimed authorities and compartmentalized experts, and pay to be generally led to flights of fantasy by the fictions of men, and so I’m really starting to wonder, what exactly is the verifiably sourced Truth worth to you, or is there even an audience left for it today? Is the Truth so horrific to a society so caught up in lies and deceit around every corner and behind every action and employment we partake in that I am your enemy for speaking the Truth? In desperation, I ask you now that if you value this self-researched, self-edited, and privately self-released (unpublished) work, which includes now well over a decade of intense collection and piecing together of primary research that went into it, and if you would like me to continue with these freely given works, then please consider making a donation to keep me going. However, while anything is appreciated, nothing is ever required, as this and all of my works are, as always up to this point, free to all to read and share — but I cannot do this any longer without your collective support. I’m not sure whether or not this 2nd book as a whole will ever get to be printed as the 1st, so today I present this large, modified, interactive part of it here, for your consideration, controversy, and spiritual preparation. It stands alone, and yet benefits as part of the whole of my work, just as all of us must also come to terms with these qualities in each other. As a continuation of the first work (book), the same disclaimers and conditions apply to this continued work as that of the first volume, for they are one in the same series, a continuation. This work is free, given as an unconditional gift to all that seek it, no strings attached. Please pass it on freely as well as you see fit. However, this is not in any way a permission to publish or print this for sale, for profit, except as a personal, not for profit copy if

needed. _

_As to the content you are about to be exposed to, I can only tell you that by the end of this essay you will have a whole new perspective and understanding, not only of what the title expresses, but the frighteningly pagan origins of Christmas and Easter and the fact that there literally cannot be any True Christians in the United States. It is impossible, indeed, and quite illegal to follow Christ while under the legal law of man. That is the purpose of nations and the deafening power of the their international legal matrix of code. And so you will certainly, after reading this, know your low, common, gentile (goyim) legal status more clearly and undeniably than ever before. Even more revealing, the undeniable pagan, Babylonian roots and continued idol worship of the universal, legalized, corporate “Christian” church (in all denominations) will also be detailed and thoroughly be brought to the light of scrutiny. And all of this will be shown through Bible passages and source documentation, connecting the dots like only yours Truly can. In the end, you shall have no doubt that the Bible is actually opposed to all “Christian” religions, and that the Bible has no relation to organized, corporate Christianity except as ordained furniture, an empty symbol, an un-utilized idol sitting upon the forbidden alters of adversarial, legal corporations. I don’t want this to be True, and it is not merely my opinion being offered. If the Truth offends you, then you are living a lie. There is nothing I can do, for I am not your enemy, merely a messenger with unshakable Truths. None of this is personal, and all or most of it applies as well to myself. I seek only Truth, no matter the cost or pain or discomfort to myself, to my lifestyle, to my whole Being. If this is not your mission, you’re likely in the wrong blogosphere. First, though, we shall recap and reinforce some things from Volume I and, of course, define some new and old terms ever more clearly for proper communication and mutually understood translation. Now, if you can, please turn of your prejudice, put what you think you know aside, remain neutral in mind and spirit, and take heed of the Truths of these words. If you find an error or mistake, or wish to put in your two cents, please leave a comment at the end. Its a couple miles down the page. For contrarians and trolls, please do so, however, only if and then after you have read this in its entirety, and I will block all comments not intended to help, enlighten, sincerely correct what is written, or otherwise contribute to the spirit of this work and those reading it. To all of you, please enjoy, and may this work bring meaning and purpose to your own, private journey. -Clint  _

.

.

_STRAWMAN: VOLUME II _ _(EXCERPT FROM A PRIVATE WORK STILL IN PROGRESS)_

.

—=—

.

_AUTHOR’S INTRODUCTION, FOREWORD, AND RECAP_

.

I know that you who might be reading this is, in the end, after all the empty pretexts in between, you who are searching for one and only one thing in this strange and soul-crushing experience we call as civil _life_… you are searching for your True Purpose. You are trying to understand your destiny, which has been veiled in mystery by those that seek to rule over you. And though you may have been blinded by your ancestors’ foolish traditions and institutions and therefore tricked into not believing in such a thing as destiny in its True meaning and intent, rest assured that it awaits you, when you are finally ready to fulfill it. But first, we must agree on terms. What is this word destiny and how is it being applied to you and I and everyone else out there in this intentional moment? DESTINY – _noun – _1. STATE OR CONDITION APPOINTED OR PREDETERMINED; ULTIMATE FATE; as, men are solicitous to know their future _destiny_ which is however happily concealed from them. 2. INVINCIBLE NECESSITY; FATE; A NECESSITY OR FIXED ORDER OF THINGS ESTABLISHED BY A DIVINE DECREE, OR BY AN INDISSOLUBLE CONNECTION OF CAUSES AND EFFECTS. But who can turn the stream of destiny? Destinies, the fates, or supposed powers which preside over human life, spin it out, and determine it; called by the Latins, _parcæ_. _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)_ FATE – _noun_ –  1. Primarily, A DECREE OR WORD PRONOUNCED BY GOD; OR A FIXED SENTENCE BY WHICH THE ORDER OF THINGS IS PRESCRIBED. Hence, INEVITABLE NECESSITY; DESTINY DEPENDING ON A SUPERIOR CAUSE AND UNCONTROLLABLE. According to the Stoics, every event is determined by _fate. _Necessity or chance not me; and what I will is _fate. _2. EVENT PREDETERMINED; LOT; DESTINY. It is our _fate_ to meet with disappointments. It is the _fate_ of mortals. Tell me what fates attend the duke of Suffolk? 3. FINAL EVENT; DEATH; DESTRUCTION. Yet still he chose the longest way to _fate, _The whizzing arrow sings, And bears thy _fate_ Antinous, on its wings. 4. CAUSE OF DEATH. Dryden calls an arrow a feathered _fate. _Divine _fate_ THE ORDER OR DETERMINATION OF GOD; PROVIDENCE. _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)_ ACT OF GOD – An act occasioned EXCLUSIVELY BY VIOLENCE OF NATURE WITHOUT THE INTERFERENCE OF ANY HUMAN AGENCY. It means A NATURAL NECESSITY NECESSITY PROCEEDING FROM PHYSICAL CAUSES ALONE WITHOUT THE INTERVENTION OF MAN. IT IS AN ACT, EVENT, HAPPENING, OR OCCURRENCE, A DISASTER AND EFFECT DUE TO NATURAL CAUSES AND INEVITABLE ACCIDENT, OR DISASTER; A NATURAL AND INEVITABLE NECESSITY WHICH IMPLIES ENTIRE EXCLUSION OF ALL HUMAN AGENCY WHICH OPERATES WITHOUT INTERFERENCE OR AID FROM MAN AND WHICH RESULTS FROM NATURAL CAUSES AND IS IN NO SENSE ATTRIBUTABLE TO HUMAN AGENCY. IT IS AN ACCIDENT WHICH COULD NOT HAVE BEEN OCCASIONED BY HUMAN AGENCY BUT PROCEEDED FROM PHYSICAL CAUSES ALONE. In the civil law, _VIS MAJOR_… INEVITABLE ACCIDENT OR CASUALTY; NOT PREVENTABLE BY HUMAN CARE, skill, or foresight, but RESULTING FROM NATURAL CAUSES, misfortunes and accidents arising from inevitable necessity which human prudence could not foresee or prevent; A LANDSLIDE IN THE PANAMA CANAL AND CHANGES IN THE STYLES OF WEARING APPAREL ARE NOT “ACTS OF GOD“; otherwise, however, as to a strike, accompanied with violence and intimidation. The term is sometimes defined as equivalent to inevitable accident: but incorrectly, as there is a distinction between the two; See INEVITABLE ACCIDENT; PERILS OF THE SEA. _(–Black’s Law Dictionary,

4th Edition)_

—=—

Man appoints, Nature (God) predetermines. Let us be clear here that what is _predetermined_ is merely that which is defined as being caused only by (an act of) God because it is not in man’s control, not preventable by the actions of men, which is defined both from the Bible and in legal law as being the same as being an act of Nature (God), the Universe, as all of self-Existence (all that is not manmade), and therefore all that Is in Its Whole, Supreme Being (verb), the substance of all that is Truth (Reality). God is Truth. What happens in, of, on, and under God is destiny, and it is our fate to bear whatever Acts of Nature (God) come our way. These acts of God, or in other words, the continuous Existence of Nature as it harmonizes Itself to Its own Law (the Logos), should not be considered as anything but neutral. There can be no actual (literal) anger or other personified, anthropomorphized emotions of man put onto the actions of Nature (God), unless you are telling a story of why the actions of men go against Gods Will (Nature’s Law). In other words, a volcano will erupt when its fate is to erupt, not because sinners live beneath or around it. If you are caught in an earthquake, you are in the right place at the right time to witness a completely neutral, inevitable act of God (Nature), for what is the destiny of the land but to continuously form and shift over the timelessness of Its Existence (God). The parabolic storytelling in the Bible assigning human attributes to God are for one and only one purpose and intent — to tell a moral story. To take these Bible stories and its characters literally is actually an ancient form of heretical idolatry, as we will discover in a moment. In other words, to put the attributes of the human form and condition upon God (the Universe, the Whole of all Existence) is to pretend that acts of men are acts of God, and worse, that acts of God are indeed acts of men. This idolatry of God as man and the mentality it causes is the foundation of most religions, and has nothing to do with the Bible or with the definition and intent of the word God (as Jehovah). To be clear, government bases its entire system and matrix code of legal law on the fact that God Exists and that all things in Nature, that which is not manmade, are always Acts of God and never of man. This is to say that an act of man is never inevitable, for man has free will, the power to choose to act against his very own Nature and pollute his Source of Existence. But the legal systems of man can work in no other way, being always in opposition to the Law of Nature (God). Legality has no purpose except to be opposed (adversarial) to the Law and acts of God (Nature). What is legal is wholly and without exception not of Nature (God). Unnatural. I am not selling you religion. I am not trying to convince you of the Existence of God. I am telling you that there is no option to not believe in the Existence of Jehovah (as God) because that word is specifically defined and intended to only mean all of self-Existence Itself as a single Whole (Uni-verse). Mono-theism. One God. One Existence. One Whole Truth. You simply cannot sanely not believe in Existence, in the Universe, in Nature and Its self-evident, self-Existent (not manmade) Law. Sorry about your ego, but God (Jehovah) Exists, or rather is defined as all of Existence Itself, whether you believe in It or not. Therefore the inevitability of what happens in Nature, including to you, will never be entirely your choice. It’s like a game of chance, where one takes or makes for himself the best odds possible to win, only in this game of monopolies we’ve made of our Lives and Livelihood, the best chance we have to survive and overcome this madness, this certain death sentence, is to fulfill our only True destiny — to Live and act in harmony with Nature and protect it from all that does not. For the fate of our Lives and natural death depends on our respect of the Law and Laws of Nature (God). You can either Live and act in harmony with God (Nature) or you can act in satanism (adversarially) against It, ignoring Its Law and believing in religious, scientific, and legalistic fantasies. Satan, like Jehovah, has a specific meaning, intent, and definition. Satan is that which is opposed to or adversarial to Nature (Jehovah) and Its Law (Logos). It’s that simple, really. Therefore, an act of man can be one of two things, either an act of God or an act of satan. In other words, if man acts accordingly and under and in harmony with the Law of Nature, his actions are in favor of God, and therefore he or she is acting Christ-like, or metaphorically what the Bible calls us to be, as a “son of God.” But if man acts against Truth, against Nature and Its Law, then that man cannot be said to be anything but an adversary of God (Truth/Nature). Thus, generally speaking, what is manmade is most often that which is adversarial to God, meaning that such inventions and devices of man are specifically designed to alter, change the course of, or fix the flow of Nature’s harmonious self-Existence. You have no choice in what God (Jehovah) Is, that’s the point. In other words, you cannot claim God doesn’t Exist when the government you are in the agency of citizenship for and bondage under has already defined and based its entire anti-God legal system of false law around that monotheistic Existence (God). You cannot change Reality, any more than a flea can change the Nature of a dog. But you can do some damage to your own environment and ability to Exist in the rest of Existence, in the Universe, in Nature and under Its Law (Logos). This predestined Law that is inescapable by man or any other Creation of God (Nature) is called the Law of God (Logos), which means the same thing as the Law of Nature, just as an “Act of God” is defined in no other way than as an Act of Nature. In order to understand in any way the structure and purpose of legal law, this neutral understanding of what “God” (as Jehovah) is defined as in both the Bible and in the legal (antiGod/antichrist) systems of law is absolutely necessary. You cannot let your religious beliefs stand in the way of what these words are specifically defined and intended to mean in order to read the Bible, or you will never have a clear understanding of any aspect of either system of law, for to understand anything you must fully understand that which is its opposite. No story can be understood, for that matter, without an agreement on the meaning of its terms. To understand the legal law, you must know that what is labeled as “legal” is always opposed (adversarial) to God (Nature) and to God’s Law, to the Law and Laws of Nature, without exception, no matter how good it may seem in any particular situation or because of some benefit it may “legally” (against God’s Law) grant to you. This is the design of the legal matrix, acting as a veil, a stepping stone over which men may pretend to be lawful while in Truth breaking the foundation of all God’s Law. We will expound upon and prove this Biblical definition of “Jehovah” (as God) herein. If you find that your ingrained belief in your own personal or religious image (idol) and mystery of God is too powerful to overcome, even despite the Bible transliteration and definitions in all sources for what God (Jehovah) is, including the government you stand under, then I recommend you either cease in reading this essay or continue with eyes to see and ears to hear, and quit denying what the Bible is telling or trying to tell you. And then you better go examine and probably cancel any insurance policies you have, because they may or may not cover an “act of God,” defined as an “inevitable act of Nature.” And since you don’t believe in this otherwise well-accepted and self-evident Truth, you’ll need to correct the government, the printers of Bibles, Bible dictionaries, Ancient linguistic lexicons, the Bible concordances… all that on top of alerting all insurance companies and probably most banking institutions about what you believe God is so that your policy reflects that purely personal perspective. Good luck with that. If you hurry, you may catch the underwriter before lunch break. Or you can TRUST BUT VERIFY for yourself the entirety of my research herein, looking up for yourself as I did every definition and reason (intent) you may find on the subject of what Jehovah (God) Is, so that we can then use that knowledge to figure out the entire bulwark and false-mysteries behind this legal, debtors hell we are trapped in. And even better, we can discover our God-given (inevitable) purpose in

this Life.

Truth is the substance behind all form, while symbol is the form that can never actually be True substance. Truth, however, may be communicated through symbol (form) only if the substance behind the form (symbol) is completely understood and agreed upon. When the meaning behind words (symbols) is lost, then words (symbols) become false idols, tools of magic spells steeped in false mystery, confusion, and lies. No author writes any book or moral lesson without acknowledgement of the meaning of the terms he or she uses. Therefore it is the first and foremost responsibility of the reader of any book or moral story to discover any meaning behind those words that has been lost to time or to improper translation. Greek, for instance, does not translate well at all into English. English is a literal code of prose while Greek is a romantic, poetic verse. The words, letters, numbers, and other glyphs created by man, therefore, are not Truth, only symbols of possible Truth, as form without substance. Truth requires no belief, while lies are powerless without belief in their artifice. Symbols are lies with purpose, and are dangerous when what was the source of Truth (substance) behind the symbol (form) is lost, making the symbol a simulacrum — a copy without (separated from) any original. In most cultures, the True intent of symbols has been lost or purposefully altered to suit the desires and progress without purpose of mankind (Adam). When the meaning behind symbols are lost, then the empty form that is left of the symbol becomes the object of religion. All religion is false today, the worship of symbology without source or reason behind the symbol. This is also what has happened, in reverse, to the bible, where the mere form of the Bible is fallaciously demonized by those who have either never read it or refuse to read it because of such stigmatism. Therefore, the Bible is the opposite of a symbol without meaning or substance, the opposite of a religious totem without source, but for many has instead become the ultimate symbol of their own ignorance. Most criticize and even quote from the Bible as they would do for a movie they have never actually seen, yet are somehow convinced by other, equally unqualified critics, that the Bible is just another bad movie. What they don’t realize is that the Bible is more like a foreign-language movie with no subtitles, and sometimes purposefully incorrect or incomplete subtitles, lost or intentionally hidden in translation. Words, which are merely strings of various symbols that project an intended meaning, are in the Bible completely misunderstood by the average reader. And so that sacred Book of Law, that very map of our collective destiny, and the very reason behind our current fate (spiritual death) in legal hell as debtors, stands not as the Greatest symbol of freedom ever known to man it was intended to be, but instead as an ode to the idiocy that has been imbred into every one of us by the institutions of church and state we are bound under and misguided by. Yes, the allegoric, metaphoric, and parabolic storytelling within the Bible is indeed a symbol intended to communicate self-evident Truth, and yet such a symbol in the wrong hands, like a weapon of mass destruction, becomes detrimental to that which it was intended to protect, turning Love into lust, meaning into nonsense, reason into fallacious logic, and Truth into the very lies (pretended mysteries) that are the foundation of the legal system, the corporate church and

state.

SYMBOL – _noun_ –  1. THE SIGN OR REPRESENTATION OF ANY MORAL THING BY THE IMAGES OR PROPERTIES OF NATURAL THINGS. Thus the lion is the _symbol_ of courage; the lamb is the _symbol_ of meekness or patience. Symbols are of various kinds, as TYPES, ENIGMAS, PARABLES, FABLES, ALLEGORIES, EMBLEMS, HIEROGLYPHICS, etc. 2. An emblem or REPRESENTATION OF SOMETHING ELSE. Thus in the eucharist, THE BREAD AND WINE ARE CALLED SYMBOLS OF THE BODY AND BLOOD OF CHRIST. 3. A letter or character which is significant. The Chinese letters are most of them symbols. THE SYMBOLS IN ALGEBRA ARE ARBITRARY. 4. In medals, a certain MARK OR FIGURE REPRESENTING A BEING OR THING, as a trident is the _symbol_ of Neptune, the peacock of June, etc. 5. AMONG CHRISTIANS, AN ABSTRACT OR COMPENDIUM; THE CREED, OR A SUMMARY OF THE ARTICLES OF RELIGION. 6. LOT; SENTENCE OF ADJUDICATION.  _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)_ LOT – _noun – _1. That which, in human speech, is called CHANCE, HAZARD, FORTUNE; but in strictness of language, is the determination of PROVIDENCE; as, the land shall be divided by _lot_

Numbers 26:55

. 2. THAT BY

WHICH THE FATE OR PORTION OF ONE IS DETERMINED; that by which an event is committed to chance, that is, to the determination of Providence; as, to cast lots; to draw lots. The _lot_ is cast into the lap, but the whole disposing thereof is of the Lord. Proverbs 16:33

. 3. THE PART,

DIVISION OR FATE WHICH FALLS TO ONE BY CHANCE, THAT IS, BY DIVINE DETERMINATION. The second _lot_ came forth to Simeon. Joshua 19:1

. He was but born

to try the _lot_ of man, to suffer and to die. 4. A distinct portion or parcel; as a _lot_ of goods; a _lot_ of boards. 5. PROPORTION OR SHARE OF TAXES; as, to pay scot and _lot. _6. IN THE UNITED STATES, A PIECE OR DIVISION OF LAND; PERHAPS ORIGINALLY ASSIGNED BY DRAWING LOTS, BUT NOW ANY PORTION, PIECE OR DIVISION. So we say, A MAN HAS A _LOT_ OF LAND in Broadway, or in the meadow; he has a _lot _in the plain, or on the mountain; he has a home-lot, a house-lot, a wood-lot. The defendants leased a house and _lot_ in the city of New York. To cast lots, is to use or throw a die, or some other instrument, by the unforseen turn or position of which, an event is by previous agreement determined. To draw lots, to determine an event by drawing one thing from a number whose marks are concealed from the drawer, and thus determining an event. – _verb transitive_ – To allot; to assign; to distribute; to sort; to catalogue; to portion. _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)_ PROVIDENCE – _noun_ –  1. THE ACT OF PROVIDING OR PREPARING FOR FUTURE USE OR APPLICATION. Providence for war is the best prevention of it.  2. FORESIGHT; TIMELY CARE; PARTICULARLY, ACTIVE FORESIGHT, OR FORESIGHT ACCOMPANIED WITH THE PROCUREMENT OF WHAT IS NECESSARY FOR FUTURE USE, OR WITH SUITABLE PREPARATION. How many of the troubles and perplexities of life proceed from want of providence! 3. IN THEOLOGY, THE CARE AND SUPERINTENDENCE WHICH GOD EXERCISES OVER HIS CREATURES. HE THAT ACKNOWLEDGES A CREATION AND DENIES A _PROVIDENCE_ INVOLVES HIMSELF IN A PALPABLE CONTRADICTION; FOR THE SAME POWER WHICH CAUSED A THING TO EXIST IS NECESSARY TO CONTINUE ITS EXISTENCE. Some persons admit a general _providence_ but deny a particular _providence _not considering that a general _providence_ consists of particulars. A BELIEF IN DIVINE _PROVIDENCE_ IS A SOURCE OF GREAT CONSOLATION TO GOOD MEN. BY DIVINE _PROVIDENCE_ IS OFTEN UNDERSTOOD GOD HIMSELF. 4. PRUDENCE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ONE’S CONCERNS OR IN PRIVATE ECONOMY. _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English

Language)_

—=—

The word _meek_ means _prepared_ in the Bible, that is, spiritually prepared. Providence. Human providence is not destiny, but it sure helps. The Truth is that Nature (God) Itself is the only Source of Real Providence, but only if man has the active foresight to protect and serve Nature (God) as the Creator It Is. Obviously, we’ve done the opposite, attempting to create our own version of Nature in order to be gods over that which is our Source, that from which we will once again return to, dust for dust. The meek shall inherit the earth. It is not that the spiritually prepared are acting in providence, it is that they are part of the divine providence that is Existence, and therefore not addicted to or dependent upon mans designs, inventions, compounds, and devises. In other words, the meek have not strayed from God’s Nature and Law, from the narrow path of spiritual well-being, and so have nothing to fear by the inevitable collapse of the invented, wholly unnatural (adversarial) world of men. Remember, what is of God is permanent, while what is made by men is always, without exception temporary. Proof of this lies not only in the ruins of past civilizations not in harmony with God’s Nature and Law, but are apparent even in our own modern infrastructure, such as roads cracked, pitted, and overgrown that lead to bridges teetering on rust-filled foundations that lead to both physically and morally decaying buildings and cities of fallen men (Adam). God (Jehovah) is the Highest substance of Providence. Nature is the Highest form of Providence. Therefore, the man in touch with and Living in harmony with Nature (God) and Its Law (Logos) are provident in and by their actions. Their preparations are not the collection of manmade, temporary things. The abundance of God (Nature) requires no hoarding, no prepping, and no competition. It merely requires good stuard-ship, protection, and unconditional Love for ALL that is Nature, all that is Existence as one Whole Supreme Being (verb). The man (son) of God, that is, the follower of the Law of God personified in the story of Jesus Christ, has nothing of the world of men to lose. He is not prepared (meek) because he saves the things of men for a time when man’s civilizations and cities and economies fall. That is foolishness to God. Nature is never lost but by the adversarial actions of men. The man (son) of God does not consider any part of Nature to be his or her own possession or property, but instead understands and self-actualizes his or her self, the mind, body, and soul, to be but a small, interconnected property of Nature, as oxygen is a property of water and of the air. So man is the property of God’s Nature. Creation is a property of the Creator. But man is the only creature that chooses to act as if the is not bound by his destiny, pretending to design his own fate, that he is above or external from God (Nature) and therefore able to break with Its Law, conducting himself in the most grotesque of manners with zero respect for what he or she is a part (property) of, like an infection on the skin. The point is that, spiritually speaking, it is impossible for man to create his own providence if his actions and plans are against that which is the divine providence of Existence (God), against that Law (Logos) which causes Existence to Exist in the form of man. In other words, it seems that in these modern times mankind has taken upon itself to unreasonably pollute all the qualities of Nature (God) that allow man to Exist in the first place within Nature, knowingly changing the air, the water, the soil, and now even the predestined genetic structure of Life (Creation) Itself, which in turn causes the fate of everything mankind has “touched” to either adapt or to wither and die in its attempt to re-harmonize Itself with the never changing Law and Laws of Nature. Sometimes, for instance, that adaptation process of the unnatural rehaemonizing or trying to reconnect to the Natural World manifests as cancers and other diseases, or geological catastrophes like sink holes and cave-ins. It seems the entire corporate structure of mans world has become nothing but a series of wagers bet against our own well-being in Nature, with a careful but increasingly ineffective avoidance of self-assured destruction, of bringing the ultimate fate of death unto a collective, premature big bang. In short, we are not fulfilling our destiny. We are not acting as ourselves, as Nature intended, but instead as that which is adversarial (satanic) to everything good and wholesome. We are, as it stands right now, the #1 enemy of Nature (God). Complacence, ignorance, and lack of personal responsibility are no excuse. For our destiny is to protect and worship that which we are a part of, that which sustains our Lives and causes our Existence. What other possible Real purpose do you think there is as a Living Part

(property) of God?

One of my favorite verses in the Bible, below, reminds me of passing a homeless child or puppy upon the street with its eyes wide in expectation of someone to save it. Nature, the rest of creature is waiting for each of us from under the vanity we have allowed to be placed over it for our own greed and corruption, not only to stop ignoring what we are doing to it, but to save it from ourselves. Nature, the “creature” or what is the Life and metaphoric, anthropomorphic notion that it carries the sense of hope that we will finally become Christ-like and fulfill our place as the heirs of God, the heirs (sons) given dominion and protection over the estate of God’s Creation (Nature) and all It Is in completeness. This is the duty, the destiny of the sons (children) of God, the heirs and only able enforcers of Logos (the Law of God through Christ), of those that finally embrace and become the forceful, protecting, Loving hand behind the True Logos. The Creature, that which is all of Creation around us, that which supports us, like an abandoned and abused puppy awaits for our return to Christ, to the Law of Nature (Logos), and therefore to our only True destiny as Its champion. The self-evident Truth of this, despite its anthropomorphic story-telling, is the story of our lives, right now, at this very moment, and always will be. And this is why the Bible Law must never be lost, never banned, and never defeated again. The evils of mans devices and inventions will always be present, and so too must be the Highest Law of Nature to prevent that technology (art) from causing the ruination of its Source.

—=—

“THE SPIRIT ITSELF BEARETH WITNESS WITH OUR SPIRIT, THAT WE ARE THE CHILDREN OF GOD: AND IF CHILDREN, THEN HEIRS; HEIRS OF GOD, AND JOINT-HEIRS WITH CHRIST; IF SO BE THAT WE SUFFER WITH _HIM_, THAT WE MAY BE ALSO GLORIFIED TOGETHER… FOR THE EARNEST EXPECTATION OF THE CREATURE WAITETH FOR THE MANIFESTATION OF THE SONS OF GOD. FOR THE CREATURE WAS MADE SUBJECT TO VANITY, NOT WILLINGLY, BUT BY REASON OF HIM WHO HATH SUBJECTED _THE SAME_ IN HOPE, BECAUSE THE CREATURE ITSELF ALSO SHALL BE DELIVERED FROM THE BONDAGE OF CORRUPTION INTO THE GLORIOUS LIBERTY OF THE CHILDREN OF GOD.“ _–Romans 8: 16-21, KJB_

—=—

The _return_ of Christ is and only can be the manifestation of Christ (Logos), the Law of God (Law of Nature), in men, when we become (are reborn) again as the sons of God (followers of Christ) we were born (destined) to be. For it is the very absence of Christ (Law) that has caused such unwilling vanity upon the creatures of the Earth by men. It is not Nature that needs correcting, but ourselves. It is the temptations of what is possible through the corruption of Nature and therefore of ourselves as part of Nature (God) that must be reprimanded.  For the Law is a preventative reaction to destructive action. Obedience to the Law of God (Jehovah) by men is the fated _return_ of Christ (Logos), for in all of Nature, it’s only men that purposefully disobey it. I will continue to repeat and verify this self-evident Truth in triplicate, for this Truth is the only solution, the only cure for our self-inflicted dis-ease upon Gods Creation (which includes all of us). In the meanwhile, all of Nature waits victimized for us to overcome our willing blindness towards its suffering at our hands. What a beautiful metaphor. Notice the word “lot” is used above to define both a _symbol_ and a _fate_? Lots wife in the Bible is named Wisdom. Can you really not see the clear metaphoric rhetoric everywhere therein? You see, your lot in life is decided by either you or by government. For the free and Lawful sojourner that is a man of God, a follower of Jesus Christ (Logos), ones lot is limited only by the size of the Earth and ones ability to travel freely thereupon. But for the US or other national citizenship (goyim), your lot is where your address is, a property line belonging to the state and rented (through taxation which is extortion) to fools that believe it to be their own property. When we purchase land, we do so by the lot. Essentially, because we are able to purchase these Monopoly board spaces and acquire limited title as users of that lot, we don’t recognize these real estate lots to be what they really are, open-air prison cells. The best prison is one in which those imprisoned both make and follow their own rules, and utilize a barter and commerce system regulated by the owners of that public prison, just as the best slave (prisoner) is one that is allowed to choose and improve upon which “profession” his enslavement fates him to. In this prison, we have what they call freedom. LOL! Perspective is everything! Citizenship is literally a life sentence (lot) of adjudication, a pre-judgement of illiteracy, whereas a Life Lived under God needs no such symbology, no such legally assigned person (status) only the absolute Truth of and in all things. Truth Exists without representation, without symbol. Yet, it is said that Truly inspired poets and integrally honest artists attempt to use symbols and even outright lies (fables) to express the moral Truth, while politicians and lawyers use them to sell and secure their own lies, for they are the artists and poets of the legal realm, professional liars (actors of the state) that are the enemies of all that is Truth (God). The Bible is a moral story told through symbology, or in other words, the Bible is a representation of moral law using allegorical characters and images of Natural things. This is called anthropomorphic storytelling, including the use of personification. Perhaps the best way to describe what modern religions have become, especially that of organized “Christianity,” is to discover that religions are for the most part lost in their own coveted, disconnected symbols, believing in the Realness of only the representation of the Real, the form alone without any contemplation of the intended (original) meaning or substance behind the symbol, and have subsequently even designed their own false doctrines (creeds) around those empty simulacra (meaningless symbols) despite the Bible’s warnings against such idolatry. To understand the problems with “Christianity” as an organized, corporate religion steeped in the legal system of mammon today, we must understand how these religions have completely misrepresented the intention of all the symbols of the Bible, replacing the substance of the moral lesson with the literal form of the “natural thing” used to metaphorically and allegorically teach the moral. The parable, the fable, the allegory… all the meaning behind the symbolism, that is, the spiritual and moral Truth the symbol represents is lost on the modern-day literal anthropomorphism of “Christian” religion. And so before we move on, I believe it is imperative that we research the history of the heretical _anthropomorphites_ of old to see their comparisons to the modern religionists of today, to the self-prescribed “Christians” that have lost all meaning of what Jesus Christ (Logos/the Law of God) represents, of what it is to be, in our actions, Truly Christ-like.

—=—

“…I must first teach you how to rid yourself of unreason. For many of you have not yet been educated. You have been dis-educated. To put it bluntly, you have been

indoctrinated.”

_—Adam McLeod, Associate Professor, Jones School of Law_

—=—

Let us not quibble or theorize on just what form God Is or Is not within Nature and in stature (appearance). Let us not, in other words, unreasonably seek such knowledge that no man is or will ever be capable of knowing. For by definition Jehovah is all substance, and therefore all Natural formation in self-Existence, without the aid or invention of man. Let us merely realize and acknowledge that the anthropomorphizing of what God actually Is into the image of man or any other lesser  form other than to tell a moral story is actually an act of idolatry, the worshiping of image (form) over substance, and that in fact all throughout history this idolatry was considered extremely heretical. Instead of a relatable learning tool used to tell a moral story, to teach the moral (unwritten) Law, the anthropomorphized (manmade) symbol of the Real thing is worshiped in place of the Real, and so the purpose and intent of the symbol is lost, as is ones grasp on Reality. And finally, let us now contemplate that the so-called “Christian” corporate religions in all denomination (by any name) is causing its adherents to do the same exact thing today. Every “Christian” I know has been unwittingly conditioned to be a modern _anthropomorphite_, not a worshiper of God but an idolater of man in Gods form, of God as man. Because of this fallacy, the Word of God (Logos) projected in the Bible is turned from Natural, self-evident Reasoning to fallacious logical conclusions not based at all on what the scriptures teach. To worship only the form (anthropomorphism) of what men portray God as in a moral story is to miss completely the substance and purpose of the entire reason behind the story. It is like having your hero be the mere appearance (form/dress) of Robin Hood while you steal from the poor to give to the rich — the very opposite of the point of the moral story. In this way, the “Christian,” unwittingly, without understanding of his or her own actions, has become the adversary of that which they fallaciously believe worshiping. So what is an antrhropomorphite? ANTHROPOMORPHITE – _noun_ – ONE WHO BELIEVES A HUMAN FORM IN THE SUPREME BEING. A SECT OF ANCIENT HERETICS ARE CALLED ANTHROPOMORPHIZES. _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the

English Language)_

ANTHROPOMORPHOUS – _adjective_ – BELONGING TO THAT WHICH HAS THE FORM OF MAN; HAVING THE FIGURE OF RESEMBLANCE TO A MAN. _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)_ ANTHROPOMORPHISM – _noun_ – THE HERESY OF THE ANTHROPOMORPHITES. _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the

English Language)_

HERESY – _noun_ –  1. A FUNDAMENTAL ERROR IN RELIGION, OR AN ERROR OF OPINION RESPECTING SOME FUNDAMENTAL DOCTRINE OF RELIGION. BUT IN COUNTRIES WHERE THERE IS AN ESTABLISHED CHURCH, AN OPINION IS DEEMED _HERESY_ WHEN IT DIFFERS FROM THAT OF THE CHURCH. THE SCRIPTURES BEING THE STANDARD OF FAITH, ANY OPINION THAT IS REPUGNANT TO ITS DOCTRINES, IS HERESY; BUT AS MEN DIFFER IN THE INTERPRETATION OF SCRIPTURE, AN OPINION DEEMED HERETICAL BY ONE BODY OF CHRISTIANS, MAY BE DEEMED ORTHODOX BY ANOTHER. In Scripture and primitive usage, heresy meant merely SECT, PARTY, OR THE DOCTRINES OF A SECT, AS WE NOW USE DENOMINATION OR PERSUASION, implying no reproach. 2. _HERESY_ IN LAW, IS AN OFFENSE AGAINST CHRISTIANITY, CONSISTING IN A DENIAL OF SOME OF ITS ESSENTIAL DOCTRINES, PUBLICLY AVOWED AND OBSTINATELY MAINTAINED. 3. AN UNTENABLE OR UNSOUND OPINION OR DOCTRINE IN POLITICS. _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)_

—=—

Webster explains things as it was, close to when the union of private States (People) was formed in compact of protection to one another. The Law was respected then, and the Law was the Bible. It was and actually still is illegal in some places to speak negatively of the Bible, God, Christ, etc., for to do so is to diminish and disrespect the fundamental principals of the foundation of Common Law. You see, anthropomorphism is a religion in and of itself. As idolatry, it is circular, meaning that without substance behind the form worshiped, or by placing that which is attainable beyond the measure of a man to obtain himself (i.e. Jesus Christ as the personified example of a follower of Gods Law), then there is nothing to gain through such empty worship. It teaches nothing because the man that worships anything supernatural (above or outside of Nature/God) may never ascend to fulfill the substance (lesson) behind the symbol. Reason and purpose behind the existence of the symbol is lost. And so the worship of Jesus Christ as a now dead man is unattainable in this life for any man, for to worship any thing of mans so-called history is to worship what does not and cannot exist in the present and future. God is timeless, as is the Law of God, the Logos (Jesus Christ). Without set meaning, a symbol is ripe for confusion, causing men to be a target of their own ignorance, and from ignorance of specified, intentional meaning in symbology, especially toward that of words, comes

fallacious logic.

There was a really, really good reason that no central church was formed in the union of States united, which was so that the Bible (as Law) would remain free to stand alone from fallacious heresy and alteration due to organized religion with unscriptural, additional doctrine. This decision was not meant to mean a total freedom from or choice of religion, this was for freedom from all other religion except the Bible as Law to be followed religiously. To follow anything religiously (verb) is the opposite of making a religion (noun) of that thing. Noun means worshiping in name (form/image) only, while a verb implies the action of following by example (by Law). Christianity as a religion (name/denomination) has turned men heretical, lethargic, and dismissive toward following the Law (Word/Son) of the Bible. There is no other way to say it than how it is defined to us – multi-denominational Christianity (noun) has been purposefully altered to be an anthropomorphic, meaningless heresy. If you think this is Clint’s opinion, when the definition is right above, then by all means shoot the messenger and ignore the damned fate you’ve created for yourself. I would expect nothing less, for while the liar conditionally hates the Truth and he who tells it, the Truth-teller Loves unconditionally the liar for Truth’s (God’s) sake. You may despise the Truth and so try and clip my wings, but be assured I am only trying to cause yours to grow. For nothing can sustain itself for long if that which is un-True is its foundation. From Wikipedia we read this well-sourced breakdown: ANTHROPOMORPHISM, or PERSONIFICATION, IS ATTRIBUTION OF HUMAN FORM OR OTHER CHARACTERISTICS TO ANYTHING OTHER THAN A HUMAN BEING. Examples include DEPICTING DEITIES WITH HUMAN FORM AND ASCRIBING HUMAN EMOTIONS OR MOTIVES TO FORCES OF NATURE, SUCH AS HURRICANES OR EARTHQUAKES. Anthropomorphism has ANCIENT ROOTS AS A LITERARY DEVICE IN STORYTELLING, AND ALSO IN ART. MOST CULTURES HAVE TRADITIONAL FABLES WITH ANTHROPOMORPHISED ANIMALS, WHICH CAN STAND OR TALK LIKE HUMANS,

AS CHARACTERS.

The word _anthropomorphism_ was first used in the mid-1700s. The word derives from the Greek ἄνθρωπος (_ánthrōpos_), “HUMAN“, and μορφή (_morphē_), “SHAPE” or “FORM“… IN RELIGION AND MYTHOLOGY, anthropomorphism refers to THE PERCEPTION OF A DIVINE BEING OR BEINGS IN HUMAN FORM, OR THE RECOGNITION OF HUMAN QUALITIES IN THESE BEINGS. ANCIENT MYTHOLOGIES FREQUENTLY REPRESENTED THE DIVINE AS DEITIES WITH HUMAN FORMS AND QUALITIES. THEY RESEMBLE HUMAN BEINGS NOT ONLY IN APPEARANCE AND PERSONALITY; THEY EXHIBITED MANY HUMAN BEHAVIORS THAT WERE USED TO EXPLAIN NATURAL PHENOMENA, CREATION, AND HISTORICAL EVENTS. The deities fell in love, married, had children, fought battles, wielded weapons, and rode horses and chariots. THEY FEASTED ON SPECIAL FOODS, and SOMETIMES REQUIRED SACRIFICES of food, beverage, AND SACRED OBJECTS TO BE MADE BY HUMAN BEINGS. SOME ANTHROPOMORPHIC DEITIES REPRESENTED SPECIFIC HUMAN CONCEPTS, such as love, war, fertility, beauty, or the seasons. Anthropomorphic deities exhibited human qualities such as beauty, wisdom, and power, and sometimes human weaknesses such as greed, hatred, jealousy, and uncontrollable anger. Greek deities such as Zeus and Apollo were often depicted in human form EXHIBITING BOTH COMMENDABLE AND DESPICABLE HUMAN TRAITS. Anthropomorphism in this case is referred to as anthropotheism. FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF ADHERENTS TO RELIGIONS IN WHICH HUMANS WERE CREATED IN THE FORM OF THE DIVINE, THE PHENOMENON MAY BE CONSIDERED THEOMORPHISM, OR THE GIVING OF DIVINE QUALITIES TO HUMANS. Anthropomorphism has cropped up AS A CHRISTIAN HERESY, particularly prominently with the Audians in 3rd century Syria, but also in 4th century Egypt AND 10TH CENTURY ITALY. THIS OFTEN WAS BASED ON A LITERAL INTERPRETATION OF GENESIS 1:27: “SO GOD CREATED MAN IN HIS OWN IMAGE, IN THE IMAGE OF GOD CREATED HE HIM; MALE AND FEMALE CREATED

HE THEM.”

—=—

Now tell me, what part of that description does not sound exactly, 100% like todays incorporated, denominated (noun/named) “Christian” religions? Not the Bible, mind you, but the religions that pretend homage to the Bible while completely ignoring the Bible Law and allegoric moral compass. I’ve certainly not met one so-called “Christian” that does not literally take the Genesis account that man is Created in Gods image, meaning in other words that God Exists out there somewhere in the literal, actual form of man, and therefore somehow detached from Nature, from the Universe, which is of course the definition of Jehovah (the Creator). Supernatural means outside of or above (not bound by) Nature and Its Law (Logos). Thus, God is not bound by God? All Existence is not part of Existence? Does God then have a spit personality in this fallacious, anthropomorphized form? Are we but a fishbowl, an ecosystem that God (as a man) watches and shakes up every once in a while? That would explain snow, like the Hallmark snow globe sitting on the mantel, and of course earthquakes and even tsunamies. As ridiculous and without merit as this notion is — that man is the actual, literal image of God as if a mirror would reveal God to look like a man — and despite the very clear and concise definitions and ancient uses of the word JEHOVAH (YHVH) as the verb meaning all that is in Supreme Being (LORD), nevertheless we find such literalist anthropomorphist behavior throughout these false religions using the name (symbol) of Christ without decyphering the meaning; without searching for the substance behind the empty,

symbolic form.

The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia® Copyright © 2013, Columbia University Press states: ANTHROPOMORPHISM – (ăn’thrəpōmôr`fĭzəm) – IN RELIGION, CONCEPTION OF DIVINITY AS BEING IN HUMAN FORM OR HAVING HUMAN CHARACTERISTICS. Anthropomorphism also applies to the ascription of human forms or characteristics to the divine spirits of things such as the winds and the rivers, events such as war and death, and abstractions such as love, beauty, strife, and hate. AS USED BY STUDENTS OF RELIGION AND ANTHROPOLOGY THE TERM IS APPLIED TO CERTAIN SYSTEMS OF RELIGIOUS BELIEF, USUALLY POLYTHEISTIC. Although SOME DEGREE OF ANTHROPOMORPHISM IS CHARACTERISTIC OF NEARLY ALL POLYTHEISTIC RELIGIONS, IT IS PERHAPS MOST WIDELY ASSOCIATED WITH THE HOMERIC GODS AND LATER GREEK RELIGION. ANTHROPOMORPHIC THOUGHT IS SAID TO HAVE DEVELOPED FROM THREE PRIMARY SOURCES: ANIMISM

, LEGEND, AND THE

NEED FOR VISUAL PRESENTATION OF THE GODS.

ANIMISM –

BELIEF IN PERSONALIZED, SUPERNATURAL BEINGS (or souls) that often inhabit ordinary animals and objects, GOVERNING THEIR EXISTENCE. British anthropologist Sir Edward Burnett Tylor argued in Primitive Culture (1871) that this belief was the most primitive and essential form of religion, and that it derived from people’s self- conscious experience of the intangible, such as one’s reflected image or dreams. He has been criticized for deducing that the chief function of religion is

to explain

various phenomena. Robert Marett studied among the Melanesians of the South Seas, noting the concept of mana, or SUPERNATURAL POWER independent of any soul. He described the belief in such a force as animatism. People may also use mana; for example, a weapon that has killed many animals may be thought to have mana, and charms believed to have mana may be placed to protect gardens. French sociologist Emile Durkheim, in his Elementary Forms of Religious Life (1912, tr. 1965), argued that the roots of religion lay in totemism (see totem), where certain objects or animals are treated as sacred objects. Although these early conceptions of animism, animitism, and totemism have been contested and revised, THE TERMS ARE STILL USED by some anthropologists to describe certain religious beliefs and rituals. See fetish; taboo; amulet; idol; shaman; ancestor

worship…

—=—

It would be perhaps more accurate to suggest that the Bible is become but an empty, detached totem (symbol) from the corporate church, which uses that sacred object (the Bible) only in its form, or for keeping up appearances if you will, as an empty symbol of those legal entities in their justification and reason to exist (as artificial persons in law), but without honoring or practicing any of the substance (Law of God/Nature) within. The very incorporation of a religion or church into the legal system of mans law as an artificial person is of course against the Bible Law, as we will show deeper into this essay in triplicate. The freemasons as well call the Bible, the Quran, and the Talmud as the FURNITURE of each lodge, another empty totem/symbol celebrated only for it use in corruption and mystery, not in any way as the foundation of Law for that false, organized crime-ridden brotherhood. That which is evil hides behind that which is good. That which is unclean puts forward in its stead that which is clean. Organized (legally incorporated) religion is no different, playing an important role as  that which misleads men away from their plotted destiny within the Bible, as the Law and divine purpose of Life, and instead leads us to their own, sometimes printed (written) false doctrine and mystery, ensuring we will be caught up in this legal matrix of mans law (the law of the land = due process) above Gods. If you try having a conversation about the Bible with a Mormon, his or her perceptions will be only from the Book of Mormon, not the Bible, and your conversation will be nothing if not confusing and unenlightening. This, of course, is not only a flagrantly direct violation of the Bible Law, but is why the Law of Nature is lost to most “Christians.” Actually, the Mormon culture does not even allow them to call themselves “Christian,” because their doctrine says that God is a man and that Christ is king of Earth, just as every registered, card-carrying, temple-worthy Mormon will be his own Christ and therefore king of his own planet after death. The Adam-God theory… Try finding that in the Bible, where no theories of man are to be respected over Truth. This is the type of ridiculously overextended anthropomorphic literalism that we must help each other overcome. And for our actions, for our attempted ruination of false doctrines, our fate will be to be hated and persecuted and even thrashed and killed. We must overcome both artifice that are the combination of legal church and state. Nothing of self-evident Truth exists in these extraneous religious doctrines, which is the ultimate litmus test, especially for the Bible as translated. But the Truth is hidden to the literalist behind the metaphor, as the poetic verse is lost in translation to the vulgar, mongrel slave-language of the English language (dog-Latin). And so the Truth can only be found with deep study and contemplation of every verse, every word. To read the Bible applying cold logic is about as effective as reading a legal case while applying common words instead of their legal meaning. All legal words are fictional, and generally opposed to Truth. So too is a metaphor, a poem, or any moral story when read literally. For your own further study, this excerpt provides (clickable) links to the Bible verses that show how such referential, anthropomorphic

rhetoric is used.

ANTHROPOMORPHISM –

(Gk. anthropos [a

+ morphe

). Assignment of human attributes to nonhuman things. BIBLICAL ANTHROPOMORPHISMS ARE USED PRIMARILY IN REFERENCE TO GOD, WHO IS NEITHER VISIBLE ( John 1:18

) NOR HUMAN ( Num

23:19  ;  1 Sam

15:29  ). THEY

ARE ALSO USED TO ASSIGN HUMAN CHARACTERISTICS TO ANGELS ( Gen 16:7

;  18:1-19:1

),

SATAN ( 1 Chron 21:1

;  Luke

13:16  ), AND DEMONS ( Luke 8:32  ). EVIL IS ALSO PERSONIFIED, DEPICTED AS SLAYING ( Psalm 34:21

) AND PURSUING

( Pr 13:21  ).

INFREQUENTLY, HUMAN QUALITIES ARE ATTRIBUTED TO ANIMALS ( Nu 22:28-30

) OR

VEGETATION ( Jud 9:7-15

).

The use of human terminology to talk about God is necessary when we, IN OUR LIMITATIONS, WISH TO EXPRESS TRUTHS ABOUT THE DEITY WHO BY HIS VERY NATURE CANNOT BE DESCRIBED OR KNOWN. From biblical times to the present, people have felt compelled to explain what God is like, and NO EXPRESSIONS OTHER THAN HUMAN TERMS ARE ABLE TO CONVEY ANY SEMBLANCE OF MEANING TO THE INDESCRIBABLE. THUS, IN GENESIS ALONE GOD CREATES

( 1:1  ), MOVES

( 1:2  ), SPEAKS

( 1:3  ), SEES

( 1:4  ), DIVIDES

( 1:4  ), PLACES

( 1:17  ), BLESSES

( 1:22  ), PLANTS

( 2:8  ), WALKS

( 3:8  ), SHUTS

( 7:16  ), SMELLS

( 8:21  ),

DESCENDS ( 11:5

), SCATTERS

( 11:8  ), HEARS

( 21:17  ), TESTS

( 22:1  ), AND

JUDGES ( 30:6  ).

PERHAPS THE MOST PROFOUND ANTHROPOMORPHISM IS THE DEPICTION OF GOD ESTABLISHING A COVENANT, FOR THE MAKING OF COVENANTS IS A VERY HUMAN ACTIVITY. God enters into an agreement (covenant) with Israel at Sinai

( Exod 19:5-6

), an

outgrowth of an earlier covenant he had made with Abraham ( Gen

17:1-18

).

LATER, THIS AGREEMENT IS TRANSFORMED INTO A NEW COVENANT THROUGH JESUS CHRIST ( Matt 26:26-29

).

THEOLOGICALLY, THE LEGAL COMPACT INITIATED BY GOD BECOMES THE INSTRUMENT THROUGH WHICH HE ESTABLISHED AN INTIMATE AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP WITH THE PEOPLE, BOTH COLLECTIVELY AND INDIVIDUALLY. WITHOUT ANTHROPOMORPHIC EXPRESSIONS, THIS THEOLOGICAL REALITY WOULD REMAIN VIRTUALLY INEXPLICABLE. ANTHROPOMORPHISMS ALSO ATTRIBUTE HUMAN FORM AND SHAPE TO GOD. God redeems Israel from Egyptian bondage with AN OUTSTRETCHED ARM ( Exod 6:6  ). Moses and his companions SEE God, and THEY EAT AND DRINK WITH HIM ( Exod 24:10-11

). Other

texts refer to THE BACK, FACE, MOUTH, LIPS, EARS, EYES, HAND, AND FINGER of God. The expression, “the Lord’s anger burned” ( Exod

4:14  ) is

interesting. A literal translation of the Hebrew is “the nose of the

Lord burned.”

Indirect anthropomorphic expressions also appear, such as THE SWORD AND ARROWS of the Lord and THE THRONE AND FOOTSTOOL of God. Akin to anthropomorphisms are ANTHROPOPATHISMS (Gk. anthropos .

—=—

In other words, the correct translation is that the earth (part of Jehovah) already existed and was filled with men (adam/mankind) in _misery, adversity, ignorance, sadness,_ and/or _wickedness_ among THE WORLD OF (CREATED BY) MEN. It was not dark because the Universe (including the sun and stars) did not yet Exist. That is after all ridiculous because such a state of Existence can never be known by man. It was intended to mean that men were miserable and without Logos (God’s Law). They followed the Babylonian gods, not the Law of Nature (of Jehovah). The Law, in other words, Logos (Jesus Christ) had not come to save them yet.

—=—

“FOR THE COMMANDMENT IS A LAMP; AND THE LAW IS LIGHT; AND REPROOFS OF INSTRUCTION ARE THE WAY OF LIFE:” _–Proverbs 6:23, KJB_

—=—

“THEN SPAKE JESUS AGAIN UNTO THEM, SAYING, I AM THE LIGHT

OF THE WORLD:

HE THAT FOLLOWETH ME SHALL NOT WALK IN DARKNESS, BUT SHALL HAVE THE LIGHT OF LIFE…“

“AS LONG

AS I AM IN THE WORLD, I AM THE LIGHT OF THE WORLD.“ _–John 8:12; 9:5, KJB_

—=—

This cannot be taken literally. Yet the literalist refuses to take other less obvious uses of metaphor or simile or parable as such. Why? Simple. Because a metaphor is not bound by the unnatural rules of the logic of men (false logos). The ability to think Higher, to consider all things with a foundation of Spirituality outside of the limited breadth and width of the human mind… this will be the man, the son of God, that has the ability to use ears to hear and eyes to see the

True Logos.

The Law is _light_.

Jesus is the _light_ of the world. He that follows the _light_ (Jesus/Law/Logos) shall escape the

_darkness_.

Ultimately, what possible use would the story of Jesus Christ as Logos be if in the beginning (Before Christ) there was anything but darkness — the ignorance of God’s Law that Christ personified? What a beautiful way to tell future generations of the Law! Unfortunately, the art and beauty of language, the use of poetry, metaphor, and parable, etc., has been lost on our logic-based generations. We have arrived in a new and more dangerous, destructive dark age, one full of useless information without knowledge, form without substance, symbols without source. And leading our way is the false logos (logic) of legal, corporate religions and false legal gods (magistrates). We love fiction because we are no longer able to decipher between what is Truth (Light of God) and what is a lie (darkness/delusion). One would need to be an incorrigible fool to take these few verses literally, for we all reasonably know that a _lamp_ is not a _commandment_ in Reality. But the lamp does serve as a perfect model to express moral, metaphoric verse (poetry). Obviously many verses verify the meanings of other verses in the Bible, and trying to comprehend one verse as a stand-alone finality is dangerous in the mouth of fools, to those who take literally words by custom or by their own limited logic (false logos) with no due diligence. We must also take note that in the Genesis account (Book of Moses), THE LIGHT WAS “CREATED” BEFORE THE SUN. How is that literally possible, unless we are to understand the proper use of this concept as a beautiful metaphor? The Source of Light in this chapter is not in fact the sun, it is Jehovah, the Universe as it already Exists. Further study reveals more impossibilities according to the Laws of Nature, the Laws of the Universe (God). Guess what else was created before the stars and the Earths’ sun and moon? Here’s a list — Day and Night, evening and morning, the firmament, the waters, the seas, dry land, grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so! Yet the sun was still missing at this point of the Creation story, on this “day.” How can that be? The sun is an integral part of the Laws of Nature, without which the grass and the seeds cannot grow for lack of sunlight. And strangely enough, even the seasons came before the sun and moon, though we know those seasons to be absolutely dependent upon the predictable Existence (Design) of these celestial bodies. So what gives? What really is this story revealed as “Creation” but something else entirely? The story of the Babylonian Creation mythos reveals that it was the magistrates that worshiped the Babylonian gods (elohym) in Genesis 1, which commanded let there be light (knowledge/logic as false logos), and thus the creation of man’s world (i.e. the legal realm), the fictional _world_ and legal governments of men were “formed” and named as the properties of men, not God. Mankind (adam) then put legal names and titles upon all things in existence to establish legal dominion over them. The Bible tells us that we will be destroyed by knowledge (empty, unspiritual information), another word for both _revelation_ and _apocalypse,_ because this destructive knowledge is not of Nature, but of the fake legal gods and fictional informations revealed by the limitations of the sciences (arts), the invented (recreated) _world_ (artifice) of man that is no part of God’s Kingdom, no part of Truth. To create something legally is to make a lie, to manufacture fiction, which in the Bible is called the “world” of men, or man’s recreation and invention of devises. Man’s devises are designed to be divisive towards God’s Creation

and Its Law.

DEVISE – _verb transitive_ – s as z.  1. TO INVENT; TO CONTRIVE; TO FORM IN THE MIND BY NEW COMBINATIONS OF IDEAS, NEW APPLICATIONS OF PRINCIPLES, OR NEW ARRANGEMENT OF PARTS; to excogitate; to strike out by thought; TO PLAN; TO SCHEME; TO PROJECT; as, to devise an engine or machine; TO DEVISE A NEW MODE OF WRITING; to devisea plan of defense; to devise arguments. To devise curious works in gold and silver. Exodus 35:32. In a bad sense: _Devise_ not evil against thy neighbor. Proverbs 3:29. 2. TO GIVE OR BEQUEATH BY WILL, AS LAND OR OTHER REAL ESTATE. – _verb intransitive_ – To consider; TO CONTRIVE; TO LAY A PLAN; TO FORM A SCHEME. _DEVISE_ HOW YOU WILL USE HIM, when he comes. Formerly followed by of; as, let us DEVISE OF EASE. – _noun_ – 1. Primarily, a dividing or division; hence, THE ACT OF BEQUEATHING BY WILL; THE ACT OF GIVING OR DISTRIBUTING REAL ESTATE BY A TESTATOR. 2. A WILL OR TESTAMENT. 3. A share of estate bequeathed. – noun – CONTRIVANCE; SCHEME INVENTED. _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)_

—=—

To create a testament is to devise, to contrive, to form a scheme. Its intent is to cause division, as to effect only those men of a specific distinction. This applies to both the Law of God and the law of man, which stand completely distinct and generally opposed to each other. The antonyms of testament are _actual sin_ and _disinherit_. And so the Law of God, the scripture, is the will of God, or in other words the inheritance of all men that choose to accept such a gift of Grace. But like all wills, unless the rules and instructions of the will are followed, one is disinherited from the benefits and good Graces of the will. We are currently, publicly standing in the legal debt prison of a nation, being disinherited from the Kingdom of Gods Nature, for we have not followed the Logos (Law/Son/Word) of God. We have ignored the will of the testator, and so suffer from our sins against Gods Nature and Law (will). The Will of God could be said to be the same as the Harmony of Nature. In general, man acts against that harmony in his decisive inventions. Whether this term devise is good, evil, or neutral depends upon the intent of the inventor/Creator. What do you possibly think the Ten Commandments were designed (devised) to be but a scheme to divide people into the Lawful and the unlawful? This is not good or bad, merely a neutral understanding based on proper terms. There obviously cannot be a “chosen people” unless that people is divided or imprisoned from the rest of us. He that is chosen is not a race or religion of men, but he that follows the Law (logos) in worship of Jehovah. There cannot be an American people or United States persons unless we are divided from all other nations and people/persons. Status is pointless without other, unequal statuses. Again this is self-evident. The Law is certainly intended to divide the wheat from the chaff. It’s really that simple. The Law of God does not unite all people, but rather it divides the law-abiding, God-fearing people from the rest of that unregenerate hoard of the fallen _adam_ (mankind). The legal law carries the opposite devise, to separate and control as one disinherited, common (vulgar) mass those unregenerate in the Logos (will of God). As I cover in triplicate in my first book, we must remember that the New Testament of God’s Word (Law) was not designed to replace the Old Testament of Law, nor was it meant to replace the ten commandments delivered by Moses the lawgiver. The New Testament of Law was intended to fulfill and thus complete the old Law. For example, the Commandment that we shall not kill refers to men, but the Mosaic Law gives unwritten exception for the persons of men to kill,and even to take an eye for an eye. In other words, a man acting in the legal (fictional) person (status) of the church or state may kill with legal permission of those false gods (magistrates) of the church and state (combined/married government). The New Testament Law closes that loophole, allowing no lame excuse to be cast by any sinner, by any breaker of the Law, and instructs that no man should be respected as a god (king) over any of us. Government is in the business of theft by taxation and exaction (extortion), and therefore cannot be bound by the New Testament. The Jew (banker in mammon) thrives upon usury, and therefore cannot abide under the New Law. There is simply no excuse under God to break Its Law of Nature, and so the Law was fulfilled by the story of its savior and testator Jesus Christ (Logos personified). Remember, its a parable, a moral story devised to teach the Law of God (Logos). Remember also that God (Jehovah) is Truth and nothing but the Truth, and so the Law of God allows no fiction, no lies, and thus no persons or flattering titles (status). This is especially poignant to those today calling themselves as “Christians,” for as the Bible teaches, it is not the name or title but the actions of the man that causes him or her to be a follower of Christ (Law). I never need identify myself as a “Christian” (status) if all my actions are under the Law as a follower of Christ’s example — as a “son of God.” This goes for all flattering titles, be they of legalistic professions like doctor or lawyer, or of false statuses given to those that are “poor” or “rich.” These are all based in mammon, upon false valuation, not on Reality. The man who heals others is certainly not a “doctor,” for doctors don’t exist in Nature, only men. Yet “doctors” in their legalistic, flattering, protected titles are clearly, statistically listed as the third leading cause of death and harm to men, for they are not acting as men, but instead pretend to be a flattering title that is allowed malpractice insurance — insurance and legal protection against causing harm and death. Men acting as “doctors” are, in other words, not self-governing under the Law of Nature (God). They are not self-responsible for the well-being of others in any way. This is totally against the New Testament Law, but not necessarily the Old Testament Law of the Jews. Thus the Jews reject Christ. They reject the New Law (Logos) that Christ represents and personifies as our example. What did Jesus say about those who say but do not do, those who can look but have not eyes to see, those who hear but do not listen, those who know the law of God (Logos) but do not act under It? More importantly, what did he say about our leaders in both religion and government? Do as they say, not as they do. Practice what they pretend to preach, not how they act. For though they may preach from the Bible, and though they may speak emptily about God, Christ, and the Law, they do not follow it and therefore should not be your example.

Follow only Christ.

—=—

“THEN SPAKE JESUS TO THE MULTITUDE, AND TO HIS DISCIPLES, SAYING, THE SCRIBES AND THE PHARISEES SIT IN MOSES’ SEAT: ALL THEREFORE WHATSOEVER THEY BID YOU OBSERVE, _THAT _OBSERVE AND

DO;

BUT DO NOT YE AFTER THEIR WORKS: FOR THEY SAY, AND DO NOT.“ _–Matthew 1-3, KJB_

—=—

“IF I DO NOT THE WORKS OF MY FATHER, BELIEVE ME NOT. BUT IF I DO, THOUGH YE BELIEVE NOT ME, BELIEVE THE WORKS: THAT YE MAY KNOW, AND BELIEVE, THAT THE FATHER _IS_ IN ME, AND I IN

HIM.“

_–John 10: 37-38, KJB_

—=—

Ouch! It is as if Christ just called out all of Christianity in one fell swoop! But most of all it is the ministers, the preachers, the evangelists, and the false fathers of church and state he refers to here, as those that use the Bible as a prop to quote from while acting legally and therefore in no way under the Law (Logos) of God. Yes, they are certainly the objects of this warning, but here Christ is specifically speaking to all of us who listen to them, for we should hear and do (act), not pretend justification for our lack of action because of the men that play false christ pretenders (fathers) every Sunday on bully pulpits. The point I’m trying to make is that every single flatteringly titled “Christian” I know also carries such flattering titles as “doctor” or other “employee” upon a legal surname (a legal persona), and therefore act in that persona/mask (name and number of a subjected citizen) of the United States or other nation, and so ARE COMPLETELY BOUND UNDER THE LEGAL LAW OF MEN THROUGH THEIR PERSONHOOD AND TITLES. They listen and read the Bible but do not act, paying only distant homage to that which they do not understand (stand under). They stand under the authority of the legal law which is wholly opposite to and adversarial (satanic) to the Bible. This is a direct violation of the Bible, of the Law of Nature (Logos), that is, to pretend personhood and title — to pretend to be something when you are no thing, no person, place, or thing (noun/name). We are

all living a lie.

We must also know that only in the second book of Moses (Genesis) do we finally find the word translation of the word LORD as Jehovah, the One True God. While Moses was a law-giver, Jesus Christ is the Law personified, the spiritual light shining in the darkness but as what keeps men from their own self-inflicted, voluntary state of darkness. Big difference. Genesis 1 is a severely redacted version of the Babylonian Creation mythology, a fact little argued amongst prominent Jewish and other Bible scholars. The people in that Old Testament story were certainly worshiping and sacrificing to Babylonian gods, as evidence by the mention of such Babylonian gods as Murdok. In that darkness (anarchy to the Law of Nature) of the Genesis account, these were the false (non-self-evident) gods that men worshiped. For Marduk defeated Tiamat, taking its rib and blood and created the universe

therefrom:

—=—

HE SLICED HER IN HALF LIKE A FISH FOR DRYING: HALF OF HER HE PUT UP TO ROOF THE SKY, DREW A BOLT ACROSS AND MADE A GUARD TO HOLD IT. HER WATERS HE ARRANGED SO THEY COULD NOT ESCAPE. _–Dalley 255, “Enuma Elish,” – Babylonian Creation Myth_

—=—

In other words, this was the formation (creation) of the “firmament.” Marduk then proceeds to create the universe from Tiamat’s body, and from TWO RIBS of Tiamat, Marduk creates east and west, and with her liver, he creates THE POLE (NORTH) STAR. He also creates the sun and moon and ORGANIZES THEIR DAILY AND MONTHLY CYCLES. The other gods swear fealty to Marduk through a similar ANOINTMENT (CHRISTENING) process as modern kings and baptismal customs, “by touching their throats with oil and water.” Murdok then “preformed miracles” by creating man, where the god Ea takes the god Kingu, cuts his arteries, AND MAKES MANKIND FROM HIS BLOOD. Ea then imposes the toil of the gods upon mankind, while Marduk divides the gods up and assigns them their various positions in heaven or earth. In gratitude to Marduk, the gods decide to build Babylon… (sited from: Grand Valley State University website, entitled ‘The Babylonian Creation Story, Hebrew: _Enuma __Elish_)

—=—

“THE ANCIENT BABYLONIAN CALENDAR… WAS BASED ON THE DIVISION OF TIME INTO WEEKS OF SEVEN DAYS…“ —_Easton’s Bible Dictionary, definition of ‘Sabbath’_

—=—

Rome/Vatican = Babylon. In the Babylonian Creation mythos, the order of the creation story is an exact match to the Genesis account of Moses, who was obviously recounting the same story as follows: (Order below = Bible — Elena Emush (Babylonian Creation myth): Who Created the universe = A single God, YHVH. — A God battling a

Goddess.

Initial state of the earth = Desolate waste; covered in darkness. — Chaos; enveloped in darkness. First development = Light created. — Light created. Next development = Firmament created – a rigid dome separating the earth and heaven. — Firmament created; also perceived as a rigid

dome.

Next development = Dry land created. — Dry land created. Next development = Sun, moon, stars created. — Sun, moon, stars

created.

Next development = Creation of men and women. — Creation of men and

women.

Final development = God rests and sanctify the Sabbath. — Gods rest

and celebrates.

—=—

It’s pretty hard to deny at this point the origin of the Genesis accounting as anything but a dumbed-down knock-off of previous mysteries of the pagan religions, though not any more ridiculous than the scientific theory of the Big Bang. And yet, though this might offend those that insist on the Truth of such a nonsensical order of appearance (e.g. light before the sun, etc.), I believe the only Real lesson to learn here is that man does not and cannot know the origin of Existence, that this knowledge is not for man to know. Man cannot know the cause of Life, lest man then becomes a false god (creator) of Existence in mans own image, which I assure you will be very ugly for us all. Some things cannot be known to man, only to God. This is not merely a mystery of God, but a self-evident Truth. And it’s ok to not know, really. In fact, our not knowing is the spice of life and the safeguard of Natures Design. Be thankful for such True mysteries of the Universe (God). We may find similar stories of the creation of this metaphoric “light” from various cultures, of course. Take for example the oldest text of the ritual called as the Border Sacrifice, which took place at the Temple of Heaven in Beijing, built A.D. 1420. This was where the emperor, whom like the pope was also high priest, would offer sacrifice to the gods. The ceremony is transcribed to begin: “_OF OLD IN THE BEGINNING, THERE WAS THE GREAT CHAOS, WITHOUT FORM AND DARK. THE FIVE ELEMENTS HAD NOT BEGUN TO REVOLVE, NOR THE SUN AND THE MOON TO SHINE. IN THE MIDST THEREOF THERE EXISTED NEITHER FORMS OR SOUND. THOU, O SPIRITUAL SOVEREIGN, CAMEST FORTH IN THY PRESIDENCY, AND FIRST DIDST DIVIDE THE GROSSER PARTS FROM THE PURER. THOU MADEST HEAVEN; THOU MADEST EARTH; THOU MADEST MAN. ALL THINGS WITH THEIR REPRODUCTIVE POWER GOT THEIR BEING._” This recitation praising Shangdi as Creator of heaven and earth sounds unsurprisingly a lot like the first chapter of Genesis: “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. The earth was without form and void, and darkness was upon the face of the deep” (Genesis

1: 1-2).

Here we find monotheism as well, the record of Chinese dynasties worshiping One God, as the Creator of all. The prayer continued: “Thou hast vouchsafed, O Di, to hear us, for Thou regardest us as a Father. I, Thy child, dull and unenlightened, am unable to show forth my dutiful feelings.” And so the same metaphorical relationship between man and God, that being Father and son, permeated this culture as well. But in order for the priest class to rule, we see that this prayer causes men to defile their own self-actualization and self-government, where the kings (god) of men teach that man cannot become such a son, cannot follow the law (light) of their God, and thus must be governed by the always married church and state. The emperor (false god) must make sacrifice to their God for forgiveness of his people’s inevitable sin. For Christians, the ritual sacrifice of the Old Testament to the Babylonian gods and to the monotheistic set of related “Gods” was replaced by the Light of the World, Jesus Christ, the Son and Testator of the Living God Jehovah, the personified example of how every man may follow the Law and thus remain in the Light. These similarities are to be found throughout the various cultures of Earth, and like all the knowledge and custom that came before the Bible and thus that led to the authoring of the Bible, it’s perfectly okay to acknowledge this fact. For the self-evident Truth is that the Bible could not have been written by men unless they already had been given the Light of Truth, of self-Evident knowledge, just as I am unable to write this essay without the massive data set I have at my fingertips, both in my research and what is allowed me in libraries and on the internet. I would never claim that any of this writing is due to my own brilliance, for I know the Truth, that there is nothing new under the sun. My words may be different and in a unique order, but they are not my own. I can give only what I have learned, and I can only edit myself by passing the same litmus test as the Bible, that being the self-evident Truth of my words. I must strive to keep my opinions based on human logic to myself, in order to let the Truth flow at all times. And I ask the reader forgiveness for those times when this may not be my disposition. It is your job to call me out, to research further whatever I say that brings doubt. But I guarantee, the Bible will enlighten you if your desire and intent is to be enlightened. Or it will cause doubt if your desire and intent is to be a doubter. If you are reading this essay with the intention to doubt or disagree, then chances are you will do just that. Stop reading until your desire is to find undeniable Truth, whether it be good or bad to your ego. For all inventions, arts, devices, words, and symbols of man are false. The Truth can only be found in Jehovah, in Nature and Its Law, in what is self-Existence. This will become clear soon enough… As one last example, one that many people reference and respect as the first written code of law, we must realize that the Code of Hamarabbi sets that king (false god) as the very descendent of the same gods, from Marduk and the rest of the Babylonian gods. Like any other man posing as a false god so as to control the masses of men, here we find Hammurabi to be just as much of a charlatan as the popes and kings and emperors and presidents of all history. That’s right. Hammurabi was the original, self-proclaimed son of the gods — just the first of many conmen of religious societies using the form of some idealistic fabled story of a pluralistic “God” figurehead as their justification to rule in the empty name (authority) of “God” — the first of many to follow that laid claim to be the living, anointed (Christened)  Son of God (Christ-head) on earth. The “Code of Hammurabi” was apparently compiled in 1780 B.C. It was based on the ancient Babylonian gods called _Anunaki. _Hammurabi, in the code itself, claims such power and authority of law because he is a descendent of the Babylonian gods themselves: Hammurabi’s Code of Laws Translated by L. W. King WHEN ANU THE SUBLIME, KING OF THE ANUNAKI, AND BEL, THE LORD OF HEAVEN AND EARTH, WHO DECREED THE FATE OF THE LAND, ASSIGNED TO MARDUK, THE OVER-RULING SON OF EA, GOD OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, DOMINION OVER EARTHLY MAN, AND MADE HIM GREAT AMONG THE IGIGI, THEY CALLED BABYLON BY HIS ILLUSTRIOUS NAME, MADE IT GREAT ON EARTH, AND FOUNDED AN EVERLASTING KINGDOM IN IT, WHOSE FOUNDATIONS ARE LAID SO SOLIDLY AS THOSE OF HEAVEN AND EARTH; THEN ANU AND BEL CALLED BY NAME ME, HAMMURABI, THE EXALTED PRINCE, WHO FEARED GOD, TO BRING ABOUT THE RULE OF RIGHTEOUSNESS IN THE LAND, TO DESTROY THE WICKED AND THE EVIL-DOERS; SO THAT THE STRONG SHOULD NOT HARM THE WEAK; SO THAT I SHOULD RULE OVER THE BLACK-HEADED PEOPLE LIKE SHAMASH, AND ENLIGHTEN THE LAND, TO FURTHER THE WELL-BEING OF MANKIND. HAMMURABI, THE PRINCE, CALLED OF BEL AM I, MAKING RICHES AND INCREASE, ENRICHING NIPPUR AND DUR-ILU BEYOND COMPARE… THE SUBLIME PRINCE, WHO MAKES THE FACE OF NINNI SHINE; WHO PRESENTS HOLY MEALS TO THE DIVINITY OF NIN-A-ZU, WHO CARED FOR ITS INHABITANTS IN THEIR NEED, PROVIDED A PORTION FOR THEM IN BABYLON IN PEACE; THE SHEPHERD OF THE OPPRESSED AND OF THE SLAVES; WHOSE DEEDS FIND FAVOR BEFORE ANUNIT, WHO PROVIDED FOR ANUNIT IN THE TEMPLE OF DUMASH IN THE SUBURB OF AGADE; WHO RECOGNIZES THE RIGHT, WHO RULES BY LAW; WHO GAVE BACK TO THE CITY OF ASHUR ITS PROTECTING GOD; WHO LET THE NAME OF ISHTAR OF NINEVEH REMAIN IN E-MISH-MISH; THE SUBLIME, WHO HUMBLES HIMSELF BEFORE THE GREAT GODS; SUCCESSOR OF SUMULA-IL; THE MIGHTY SON OF SIN-MUBALLIT; THE ROYAL SCION OF ETERNITY; THE MIGHTY MONARCH, THE SUN OF BABYLON, WHOSE RAYS SHED LIGHT OVER THE LAND OF SUMER AND AKKAD; THE KING, OBEYED BY THE FOUR QUARTERS OF THE WORLD; BELOVED OF NINNI, AM I. WHEN MARDUK SENT ME TO RULE OVER MEN, TO GIVE THE PROTECTION OF RIGHT TO THE LAND, I DID RIGHT AND RIGHTEOUSNESS IN…, AND BROUGHT ABOUT THE WELL-BEING OF THE OPPRESSED.

—=—

They obviously had no problem with run-on sentences back then! But you get the picture. Hammurabi (the Rabi Hammu) ruled not only by his gods but in the place (as vicar) of his gods. Anti-god. Not the I AM but the am I. He was self-proclaimed as the appointed king of the Babylonian gods. Sorry to those who patriotically believe the right to land as property is a right given by God (Jehovah), but in reality it is Marduk the Babylonian god, through his vessel Hammurabi, from which the origin of your delusional (godly) rights came from. Property rights are not in the Bible, for the part cannot own the Whole. Property rights are the device of nations, bestowed to subjects (goyim) that suffer without God’s Law in legalistic darkness. Hammurabi is one of the celebrated law-givers of the Congress of the United States. Jesus, however, is nowhere to be found in Washington D.C., for Jesus Christ is the Law of God in and of Itself. Only men, false gods, have their busts hung in the halls of Congress. Jehovah, the One True God, is absentee as the ultimate giver of the Son, the Law of Nature. And so we see that those who compare and make claim that Jesus Christ is the same as the sun worship of the sun gods of those Babylonian mystery religions are horribly mistaken. The Son of God is not the sun, nor is the Light of wisdom the rays of the sun. Inversely, if anyone out there thinks this claim by Hammurabi is any different than what the Vatican corporation and its pope claims in being the appointed prince and therefore replacement god and Christ on earth, you are indeed fooling yourself with the mastery of the Babylonian worshiping masses of the Old Testament. Oh, and England, your queen claims the same thing in her (or the king’s) anointment of christening, to be the replacement (anti) Christ of the kingdom, the marriage of church and state. You need to be blind not to see this same, continuous pattern of the false gods of history up until today. Do not forget that the law and god of the master is therefore the accepted law and god of the subject (citizen). As all constitutions are indeed masonic by their nature (origin), let us hear on the subject from Albert Pike, remembering that in Genesis 1, it is the Babylonian “Elohim” (gods) that “created” (devised) the Earth (man’s world), not Jehovah, for the Earth as we call it is already a part of Jehovah (self-Existence/the Universe). We must understand that Jehovah is the Universe, and that all things adversarial to Jehovah are of the adverse (adversary/Satan). The Universe (Jehovah) is the One Living God, that is, the very meaning and intention of the word _monotheism_. All self-Existence as One God. This, the Bible says, is YHVH. Not an unspoken word, just unspeakable, as that which is unfathomable in terms of the mere artful words of men. Jehovah (YHVH) is the Known and the Unknown Existence of all Creation — the Living God. The word LORD and GOD was never intended to mean anything but this, nor was there ever any conception that anyone would actually debate the Existence of Existence (God) itself, as the “educated” fools of today do. But such a wondrous, beautiful Truth, that God is all Truth, must be confused, confounded, controverted, and controlled by these societies of their own secrets, false information and false gods created to interfere with our own understanding of the Truth of what our God Is. Through these Babylonian mystery schools and religions the public is kept away from the Truth, away from our own Source. For the best way to keep secret the Nature of God and the Law thereof is to cause the common people to not only believe in so many false gods and versions in idolatry of the same image of what God Is, but to obfuscate the intended meanings and definitions of the words of the Bible so that clarity is only possible to the one in a million that devote their lives to such research and understanding. But those men are usually not honorable, acting merely as part of the priest-class (secret-keepers) of the Church and State and its societies of the secrets they create that cause ignorance for the masses. Pike reveals this revenant worship of their Babylonian religion of mystery here:

—=—

“MAN DESCENDED FROM THE ELEMENTAL FORCES OR TITANS , WHO FED ON THE BODY OF THE PANTHEISTIC DEITY CREATING THE UNIVERSE BY SELF-SACRIFICE, commemorates in sacramental observance this mysterious passion; and while partaking of the raw flesh of the victim, seems to be invigorated by a fresh draught from the fountain of universal life, TO RECEIVE A NEW PLEDGE OF REGENERATED EXISTENCE. Death is the inseparable antecedent of life; the seed dies in order to produce the plant, and earth itself is rent asunder and dies at the birth of Dionusos _(Dionysus)_. Hence the significance of THE PHALLUS, OR OF ITS INOFFENSIVE SUBSTITUTE, THE OBELISK, RISING AS AN EMBLEM OF RESURRECTION by the tomb of buried DEITY at Lerna or at Sais… And in this sense, as presiding over life and death, DIONUSOS IS IN THE HIGHEST SENSE THE LIBERTATOR (LIBERTY): since, LIKE OSIRIS, HE FREES THE SOUL AND GUIDES IT IN ITS MIGRATIONS BEYOND THE GRAVE, PRESERVING IT FROM THE RISK OF FALLING UNDER THE SLAVERY OF MATTER OR SOME INFERIOR ANIMAL FORM…” _–Albert Pike, ‘Morals and Dogma’, page 393, 1872_

—=—

It amazes me still that most visitors to the Vatican, to Washington D.C., and to the City of London have no clue that this same touted phallus shaped obelisk erected in honor of the Old Testament Babylonian gods stands openly in each of these and other centers of false authority. Yes, your so-called liberty comes from the congressional worship of a giant, erected cock representing the Liberator Dionysus. For these places of false law and religion do not worship Jehovah, the Living God that is the Universe, the God of Nature and Its Law, but instead derive their false law from that which is opposed (adverse) to It, the codes of storied men like Hammurabi and other legalists of history, the progenitors of the Roman (written) law of man, of that which is anti-God, antichrist. And the common (vulgar) citizens of the nations actually believe that their legal franchise of “liberty” in these open-air prisons of mammon is of the God of Nature, instead of what its obelisks celebrate in open worship, Dionysos the “Liberator” god and the idol (statue) of Liberty that adorns the commercial port of america. This idol standing again openly in defiance of the Bible Law, that of the pagan goddess Madonna, called generically for the masses as the Statue (idol) of Liberty, is of course the same ancient pagan “Queen of Heaven,” the wife of Nimrod, or Semiramis, Isis being the Egyptian name for the Babylonian goddess Ishtar, the same as Greek goddess Athena, the Egyptian and Greek goddess Minerva, the Syrian goddess Astarte, the Roman goddess Cybele, The Babylonian (Jewish/Israel) Ashtoreth, and the Attic-Ionian (Ephesus) goddess Diana. And just what is Lady Liberty and whom was its architect Auguste Bertholdi?

—=—

“AUGUSTE BERTHOLDI WAS A MEMBER OF THE CULTIC MASONIC LODGE IN PARIS, A `…SECRET INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD LINKED TO THE ANCIENT BUILDERS OF THE PYRAMIDS AND THE CATHEDRALS‘ ; AND AS A RESULT, FELLOW MEMBERS OF THE MYSTERIOUS ORDER OF MASONS `…WERE FREQUENTLY INVOLVED WITH THE CREATION OF THE STRUCTURE, AND THE VARIOUS CEREMONIES THAT WERE DEDICATED TO IT‘ . FOR EXAMPLE, THE PEDESTAL WAS BUILT BY ANOTHER MASON NAMED RICHARD HUNT, AND THE DESIGN CAME FROM HIS STUDY OF `…PYRAMIDS, ZIGGURATS, AND OTHER… STYLES’ . YOU’LL RECALL THE TOWER OF BABEL WAS A ZIGGURAT; AND OF COURSE, THE STATUE OF LIBERTY IS ACTUALLY A TOWER.“ _–James Lloyd, Beyond Babylon, p.103_

—=—

“IT IS ADMITTED THAT THE SECRET SYSTEM OF FREE MASONRY WAS ORIGINALLY FOUNDED ON THE MYSTERIES OF THE EGYPTIAN ISIS, THE GODDESS-MOTHER, OR WIFE OF OSIRIS. BUT WHAT COULD HAVE LED TO THE UNION OF A MASONIC BODY WITH THESE MYSTERIES, HAD THEY NOT HAD PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO ARCHITECTURE, AND HAD THE GOD WHO WAS WORSHIPPED IN THEM NOT BEEN CELEBRATED FOR HIS SUCCESS IN PERFECTING THE ARTS OF FORTIFICATION AND BUILDING. NOW, IF SUCH WERE THE CASE, CONSIDERING THE RELATION IN WHICH, AS WE HAVE ALREADY SEEN, EGYPT STOOD TO BABYLON, WHO WOULD NATURALLY BE LOOKED UP TO THERE AS THE GREAT PATRON OF THE MASONIC ART? THE STRONG PRESUMPTION IS, THAT NIMROD MUST HAVE BEEN THE MAN. HE WAS THE FIRST THAT GAINED FAME IN THIS WAY. AS THE CHILD OF THE BABYLONIAN GODDESS-MOTHER, HE (NIMROD) WAS WORSHIPPED, AS WE HAVE SEEN, IN THE CHARACTER OF ALAMAHOZIM, ‘THE GOD OF FORTIFICATIONS.’ OSIRIS, IN LIKE MANNER, THE CHILD OF THE EGYPTIAN MADONNA, WAS EQUALLY CELEBRATED AS ‘THE STRONG CHIEF OF THE BUILDINGS.’ THIS STRONG CHIEF OF THE BUILDINGS WAS ORIGINALLY WORSHIPPED IN EGYPT WITH EVERY PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTIC OF NIMROD.“ _–Alexander Hislop, “The Two Babylons”  p.43_

—=—

Need I mention the modern day Mary (Fatima) sacred feminine worship of the Catholic Church, also called the MADONA, carries over into much of protestant “Christianity,” and therefore many of these continue to “universally” (Catholicly) worship Mary as a sort of goddess idol as well, as the actual human “mother” of Christ, as the Romanized, Judaized “Christians” have been entrained to believe in a literal sense? I stress again here that Jesus Christ, the Law of God, the Logos, was not born of Mary, but of God. This distinction is so completely different from one another that it would be like mistaking a prop in a kindergarten school play colored in by a 4 year old as a Real tree. Mary worship is as empty as Christ worship, and it is patent, scripturally identifiable idolatry. In fact, I say again, Christ is to be formed (conceived) in all of you, in me, and in all men that may receive that Blessing of the Logos and subsequently act within Its Grace at all times as sons of God. To worship Mary as mother of Christ is again to externalize the metaphorically maternal ability of us all to conceive of Christ in our

own lives.

—=—

“My little children, OF WHOM I TRAVAIL IN BIRTH AGAIN UNTIL CHRIST BE FORMED IN YOU, I DESIRE TO BE PRESENT WITH YOU NOW, and to change my voice; for I stand in doubt of you. Tell me, YE THAT DESIRE TO BE UNDER THE LAW, DO YE NOT HEAR THE LAW? …” _–Galatians 4: 19-, KJB_

—=—

How will Jesus Christ (Logos) be formed in all of us, we who seek to become the sons of God? To the literalist, perhaps, this is tantamount to some spiritual mass-orgy so that we may all become pregnant and have a “virgin” birth? Imagine that, men giving birth to billions of Baby Jesus’s. Metaphorically, because Jesus Christ is the Law of God (Logos) personified, the Law of Nature, this is of course to be taken in the beautiful and poetic way it is intended, that we may carry Jesus Christ with us as our salvation (Law of Jehovah), that we may bear the burden of God’s Grace as protectorate in dominion over the Earth through the Law, that we may manifest the True Logos in all our actions. Just as water can be impregnated with copper, so too must man be impregnated with the Logos, Jesus Christ. But what is the difference between the Catholic version of “Mary” and that which is of the Bible? After all, every alter I’ve seen displays Mary in benevolence and reverence while poor Jesus is like a museum piece hanging in his death on a cross with a crown of thorns. Meanwhile, we see that the “blessed Mother” Mary holds the baby version of Jesus Christ in her swatling arms, celebrated somehow as the mother of God. This, of course, places Jesus Christ as God, not as the Son (Word) of God. Big difference. And this misconception (pun intended) is merely because most Catholics have no idea they are actually worshiping the old Babylonian gods in a case of purposefully mistaken identity, for what appears in the form of Mary and her son (Jesus) is actually the representational mystery of the goddess-mother Isis bearing her sun-god (son). Of course in the ministry of the vatican empire, Christ must be un-scripturally worshiped as a God so that the pope can pretend to be vicar of God (Christ) on earth, the anti (replacement) God and Christ-head. But to be the mother of Jesus Christ… does that make Mary a Titan (Elohim) according to Pike’s quote above? In most Roman Catholic tomes of devotion this Lady of the Jesuits, an ancient mythological version of the _Mother of God_, is enthroned and completed with scepter and crown as the Queen of Heaven. This is no different than the worship of Astarte of the Assyrians, Ashtoreth of the Sidonians, Bowaney of the Hindoos, and of course Venus or Hera in Greece and Juno in Rome, all of which occupy the same basic honorable title in the conception or creation of all things. It is also rumored that the statue of St. Peter holding the keys to heaven is actually Juno’s consort, the god Jupiter repurposed for official “Christian” worship – not of christ but of the so-called (by Catholics) “first pope.” Another name for Juno is “Regina,” meaning queen, mother of Mars and Vulcan. She is also the “protector and councilor of the state.” Yet all of this pagan worship of gods and saints has nothing to do with the scriptural story, except to say that before Christ, during the time of Moses, the fictional Babylonian gods and the laws emanating therefrom ruled supreme over man (in darkness). It appears that in the Catholic tradition, this fact never changed, which is why the Bible warns us so much against putting our faith in that Roman corporation and its false doctrines.

—=—

VIRGIN BIRTH

“I. DEFINITION: “VIRGIN-BIRTH” IS THE CORRECT AND ONLY CORRECT DESIGNATION OF THE BIRTH STATEMENT CONTAINED IN THE GOSPELS OF MATTHEW AND LUKE. “IMMACULATE CONCEPTION” IS OF COURSE MANIFESTLY A BLUNDER DUE TO THE CONFUSION OF ONE IDEA WITH ANOTHER. “SUPERNATURAL OR MIRACULOUS BIRTH” WILL NOT DO, BECAUSE THERE IS NO INTIMATION THAT THE PROCESS OF BIRTH WAS IN ANY WAY EXCEPTIONAL. “SUPERNATURAL OR MIRACULOUS CONCEPTION” IS EQUALLY UNSATISFACTORY AS IT INVOLVES A QUESTION-BEGGING COMPARISON BETWEEN THE BIRTH OF CHRIST AND THE EXCEPTIONAL BIRTHS OF THE SONS OF PROMISE (E.G. ISAAC, JOHN THE BAPTIST, ETC.). THE ONLY STATEMENT WHICH IS SUFFICIENTLY SPECIFIC IS “VIRGIN-BIRTH,” INASMUCH AS ACCORDING TO THE NEW TESTAMENT STATEMENT MARY WAS AT THE TIME OF THIS BIRTH _VIRGO INTACT_.”

—=—

This word VIRGIN takes a very different meaning than the literalist and vulgar sexual connotations of the masses entertained by such oddly pornographic concepts, as that of Strong’s H1330 – _bĕthuwlah_ (_áÌÀúåÌìÈä_) (virgin) and is used FIGURATIVELY according to the Gesenius’ Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon in the following manner: “(1) A VIRGIN, PURE AND UNSPOTTED, so called as BEING SEPARATED AND SECLUDED FROM INTERCOURSE WITH MEN (_AS BEING AND ACTING WITH PURELY RELIGIOUS MANNERS_)…(3)… familiar to the Hebrews, BY WHICH CITIES OR STATES ARE SPOKEN OF UNDER THE FIGURE OF WOMEN, THEY ARE ALSO CALLED VIRGINS… also simply “THE VIRGIN OF ISRAEL” (IS USED) OF THE PEOPLE OF ISRAEL, in Jeremiah 18:13; 31: 4, 21, and in Amos 5:2. Rightly… THE CONGREGATION OF ISRAEL.”

—=—

The word _daughters_ is also used to describe the people of a city in that old, metaphoric language. The translation to English is virtually impossible to understand unless this poetic nature of the older languages is understood and applied with vigor to the scriptures. The non-Biblical Catholic term_ immaculate conception_ is of course left over from the Babylonian worship of the sacred feminine

—=—

“She (_Mary_) has been appointed by God to be the Queen of heaven and earth.” _—Quote by Pius IX, 1854, made “official” bull in 1954 by Pius

XII._

—=—

“I CAN NEVER FORGET THE SHOCK I RECEIVED WHEN I FIRST SAW IN THEIR CHURCHES IN ITALY, THE VIRGIN MARY CROWNED AS QUEEN OF HEAVEN, SEATED ON THE SAME THRONE WITH JESUS CROWNED KING OF HEAVEN. THESE WERE THE GOD-MAN AND GOD-WOMAN ENTHRONED ALIKE. THERE WAS NOTHING TO DISTINGUISH THE ONE ABOVE THE OTHER.” _—Reverend M. Hobart Seymour, “Evenings with the Romanists,”

page 254_

—=—

Appointed by God… You see, unless you know that the pope is acting vicariously as the false (anti-) God and as the false (anti-) Christ (false Logos) anointed by oils, then you cannot understand how it is that “God” could have possibly appointed Mary as queen of Heaven and Earth since this fact is absolutely nowhere in the Bible. The pope pretends to be God. For further understanding, keep reading, and you will have no doubt that the pope has a serious God complex, that his office allows him to change the Law of God, the Bible doctrine, to his own corporations’ needs. This isn’t Clint’s opinion, but the Vaticans. Stay tuned… I feel it to be so important to differentiate the innocent and pure of heart notion of Mary in the bible from the Babylonian Queen and mother of heaven worship of the corporate Roman church that I include this whole entry on the subject for clarity and proof of this corruption in the false “universal” Roman church. Let us examine the sacred feminine deity of Catholicism, the mother goddess Mary, also styled as “the mother of mankind,” not as celebrated for her allegorically innocent, unplanned generation of Jesus Christ by the Grace of God, but by her own supposed (by a Papal Bull in the 1800’s) and completely unscriptural perfection of birth. It is the birth of Mary (Fatima), not Christ, that the Catholic cherishes. THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION – (_i-mak’-u-lat kon-sep’-shun_): 1. Definition: The historic DESIGNATION OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DOGMA PROMULGATED BY POPE PIUS IX on December 8, 1854, IN THE PAPAL BULL ENTITLED “_INEFFABILIS DEUS_.” THE TERM IS OFTEN INCORRECTLY APPLIED, EVEN BY THOSE WHOSE INTELLIGENCE SHOULD MAKE SUCH AN ERROR IMPOSSIBLE, TO THE VIRGIN BIRTH OF CHRIST (which see). 2. Statement of the Dogma: The central affirmation of this proclamation, which was read in Peter’s in the presence of over two hundred bishops, is expressed in the following words: IT IS PROCLAIMED “BY THE AUTHORITY OF OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST AND THE BLESSED APOSTLES PETER AND PAUL AND IN OUR OWN AUTHORITY, THAT THE DOCTRINE WHICH HOLDS THE BLESSED VIRGIN MARY TO HAVE BEEN, FROM THE FIRST INSTANT OF HER CONCEPTION, BY A SINGULAR GRACE AND PRIVILEGE OF ALMIGHTY GOD, IN VIEW OF THE MERITS OF CHRIST JESUS THE SAVIOUR OF MANKIND, PRESERVED FREE FROM ALL STAIN OF ORIGINAL SIN, WAS REVEALED BY GOD, AND IS, THEREFORE, TO BE FIRMLY AND CONSTANTLY BELIEVED BY ALL THE FAITHFUL” (see Schaff, A History of the Creeds of Christendom, II, 211, 212). 3. Objections to the Dogma: (1) Drawn from Specifically Protestant Principles. OBJECTIONS TO THE DOGMA ARE MAINLY TWO: (a) THE CLAIM TO AUTHORITY UPON WHICH THE PROCLAMATION RESTS. There is every reason to believe that ONE OF THE MAJOR MOTIVES TO THE ENTIRE TRANSACTION WAS THE WISH, ON THE PART OF PIUS AND HIS ADVISERS, TO MAKE AN UNMISTAKABLE ASSERTION OF ABSOLUTE DOCTRINAL AUTHORITY BY THE ROMAN PONTIFF. To Protestants of all shades of opinion there would be UNBEARABLE OFFENSE IN THE WORDING OF THE DECREE, even if assent could be given to the doctrine itself. The whole vital issue of the REFORMATION is involved in the USE BY AN ECCLESIASTIC OF THE WORDS “IN OUR OWN AUTHORITY” IN ADDITION TO THE WORDS “BY THE AUTHORITY OF OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST AND THE BLESSED APOSTLES PETER AND

PAUL.“

(b) The tendency to MARIOLATRY in the entire movement. As we shall see, the ascription of Divine honors to Mary is avoided in the public statement of the dogma and in the defense of it by Roman Catholic writers, BUT ONE HAS BUT TO SURVEY THE COURSE OF DISCUSSION LEADING UP TO THE PUBLICATION OF 1854, AND SUBSEQUENT TO IT, TO DISCOVER A GROWING TENDENCY TO LIFT MARY OUT OF THE REALM OF HUMAN BEINGS AND TO ENDOW HER WITH DIVINE ATTRIBUTES AND FUNCTIONS. An extended discussion of Mariolatry lies beyond the range of this article (see MARY); it is only necessary to point out the obvious connections (see Roman Catholic Dictionary and church histories, sub loc.). (2)DRAWN FROM ROMAN CATHOLIC PRINCIPLES. It is far from the truth to suppose that there are no objections to this MODERN DOGMA save those which are specifically Protestant. FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF THE DEVOUT ROMAN CATHOLIC, AND FOR THE SAKE OF THE PRESTIGE OF THE PAPACY, THIS PARTICULAR DOGMA SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN UNFORTUNATELY CHOSEN. (a) IT HAS NO BASIS IN SCRIPTURE. The only attempt made to provide a Scriptural argument is by using a vague and unsatisfactory parallel BETWEEN MARY AND EVE BEFORE THE FALL, to be found in the writings of certain church Fathers who did not hold the papal dogma but unconsciously provided a slender and most insecure basis for it (see inacanus). MOST ROMAN CATHOLIC WRITERS ARE INTELLIGENT ENOUGH TO ADMIT THAT THEORY OF INSPIRED TRADITION ALONE CAN BE APPEALED TO IN SUPPORT OF THE IDEA. The ordinary and only tenable argument is that the ECCLESIASTICAL PROMULGATION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE DOCTRINE PROVE ITS APOSTOLIC ORIGIN (see Catholic Dictionary, sub loc.). (b) IT WEAKENS THE AUTHORITY OF THE CHURCH. It would almost seem as if the doctrines of ecclesiastical authority and particularly of papal infallibility had, in this unfortunate proclamation, reached a _reductio ad obsurdum_ for the comfort of their foes. Notice with care the historical standing of this dogma: (i) THE ACKNOWLEDGED ABSENCE OF ALL POSITIVE EVIDENCE FOR APOSTOLIC ORIGIN AND PRIMITIVE AUTHORITY (see Catholic Dictionary _ut supra_). (ii) The abundant positive evidence that THE PRINCIPAL FATHERS OF THE EARLY CHURCH DID NOT BELIEVE IN THE SINLESSNESS OF MARY (see list of names and references given by H.C. Sheldon, History of the Christian Church, _sub loc_.). (iii) The uncertain and equivocal testimony per contra drawn from the early Fathers. They are practically confined to the following: Ephrem Syrus (Carmina, Hymn 27, strophe 8), where he says “TRULY IT IS THOU AND THY MOTHER ONLY WHO ARE FAIR ALTOGETHER. FOR IN THEE THERE IS NO STAIN AND IN THY MOTHER NO SPOT“; Augustine (De Natura et Gratia, cap. 26), “TWO WERE MADE SIMPLE, INNOCENT, PERFECTLY LIKE EACH OTHER, MARY AND EVE,” etc. To these may be added the words of Irenaeus: “THE KNOT OF EVE’S DISOBEDIENCE WAS UNTIED BY MARY’S OBEDIENCE” (Catholic Dictionary, 422). In regard to these three passages it may reasonably be contended that EVEN IF THESE STATEMENTS NECESSARILY IMPLIED THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION OF MARY, WHICH THEY CERTAINLY DO NOT, they would still have to be estimated against the many weighty statements which may be brought forward on the other

side.

(iv) The prolonged controversy over the doctrine. From the earliest time WHEN THE IDEA OF MARY’S MIRACULOUS FREEDOM FROM SIN APPEARS, UP TO THE OLD CATHOLIC AGREEMENT OF 1874, DEVOUT AND FAITHFUL ROMAN CATHOLICS HAVE PROTESTED AGAINST THE ADDITION OF THIS UNSCRIPTURAL DOGMA TO THE FAITH OF THE CHURCH. Bonaventura (Locus Theol., VII, 1) says: “ALL THE SAINTS WHO HAVE MADE MENTION OF THIS MATTER, WITH ONE MOUTH HAVE ASSERTED THAT THE BLESSED VIRGIN WAS CONCEIVED IN ORIGINAL SIN.” With the statement of the Old Catholic agreement we may safely sum up the ecclesiastical situation, even from the viewpoint of those who hold to the doctrinal validity of tradition. Art. X reads: “WE REJECT THE NEW ROMAN DOCTRINE OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION OF THE BLESSED VIRGIN MARY, AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE TRADITION OF THE FIRST 13 CENTURIES, ACCORDING TO WHICH CHRIST ALONE IS CONCEIVED WITHOUT

SIN.“

(3) Drawn from General Considerations of Christian Doctrine. The most serious objections to this offensive and gratuitous dogma are not at all specifically Protestant but, rather, BROADLY CHRISTIAN. It is necessary at this point to assure ourselves that we understand (as many Protestants evidently do not) just what is meant by the doctrine as a doctrine. According to the accepted Roman Catholic explanation, MARY, AT THE SUPPOSED STAGE OF HER CONCEPTION WHEN THE SOUL WAS ACTUALLY INFUSED INTO THE BODY WAITING FOR IT, RECEIVED THE SPECIAL GRACE OF GOD WHEREBY SHE WAS DELIVERED FROM ALL STAIN OF ORIGINAL SIN. The point which Protestants need especially to note is that, according to Roman Catholic ideas, this gracious act of God was performed on the basis of the foreseen merits of Christ’s sacrifice. This tones down the offensiveness of the doctrine in that it does not per se imply the equality of Mary with Christ, but rather the contrary, in so far as THE GRACE BESTOWED UPON HER WAS GAINED BY ANTICIPATION FROM HIM. Roman Catholic writers naturally emphasize this fact in recommending the doctrine to Protestant minds. None the less the offense remains. THE “IMMACULATE CONCEPTION” NECESSARILY IMPLIES THE “IMMACULATE LIFE,” AND ON THE SAME BASIS OF SUPERNATURAL GRACE, ELSE WOULD THE SPECIAL MIRACLE HAVE OCCURRED IN VAIN AND THE FALL OF ADAM BEEN REPEATED IN MARY. HENCE, A FULL ACCOUNT OF THE DOCTRINE WOULD BE THAT MARY WAS COMPLETELY AND MIRACULOUSLY REDEEMED AT HER CONCEPTION AND COMPLETELY AND MIRACULOUSLY KEPT FROM SIN THROUGHOUT HER WHOLE LIFE. Apart from all questions as to the rightful place of Mary in Christian thought, THIS IDEA INVOLVES UTTER DOCTRINAL CONFUSION. IT MEANS THAT MARY NEVER BECAME A TRUE HUMAN BEING AND NEVER LIVED A TRUE HUMAN LIFE. REDEMPTION BY A MIRACULOUS PROCESS BEGUN AT CONCEPTION AND CARRIED ON THROUGHOUT THE LIFE IS AN UTTER IMPOSSIBILITY, FOR THE HOLY SPIRIT DOES NOT WORK IMPERSONALLY, AND MIRACULOUS HOLINESS WHICH IS HOLINESS OF A PURELY DIVINE CHARACTER, WITHOUT A FREE, COOPERATING HUMAN FACTOR, IS NO HUMAN HOLINESS AT ALL. THIS DOGMA READS MARY OUT OF THE HUMAN FAMILY, REDUCES HER TO AN IMAGE AND MAKES HER LIFE A PHANTASM. Moreover, the parallels which are adduced in its support are not true parallels at all. OUR LORD’S SINLESSNESS WAS NOT MECHANICALLY GUARANTEED BY HIS MIRACULOUS CONCEPTION (SEE VIRGIN BIRTH) BUT WAS HIS OWN ACHIEVEMENT THROUGH THE HOLY SPIRIT GRANTED TO HIM AND PERSONALLY APPROPRIATED. The Hallowing of Children at the Font (see Catholic Dictionary, 470a), THE SANCTIFYING OF THOSE “SEPARATED FROM THE WOMB” (Ga 1:15) TO GOD’S SERVICE, DOES NOT IMPLY THE MIRACULOUS GUARANTEE OF ARTIFICIAL SINLESSNESS, BUT SUCH A GRACIOUS INFLUENCE AS ENABLES THE SUBJECT FREELY COOPERATING TO OBTAIN VICTORY OVER SIN AS A CONTROLLING PRINCIPLE. ACTUAL SIN AND NEED OF FORGIVENESS IS NOT PRETERMITTED BY

SUCH SPECIAL GRACE.

We can only say, in conclusion, THAT EVERY REASON, WHICH USUALLY OPERATES IN A CHRISTIAN MIND TO INSURE REJECTION OF A FALSE TEACHING, OUGHT TO PRECLUDE THE POSSIBILITY OF ACCEPTING THIS PECULIAR DOGMA WHICH IS SCRIPTURALLY BASELESS, HISTORICALLY UNJUSTIFIED AND DOCTRINALLY UNSOUND. LITERATURE: The best simple and reasonably fair-minded discussion of this dogma from the Roman Catholic viewpoint is to be found in the Catholic Dictionary already mentioned, where wide references will be found. For the Protestant view consult any authoritative church history, especially that of Professor H.C. Sheldon where copious references to Patristic literature will be found. _—‘International Standard Bible Encyclopaedia,’ entry written by: Louis Matthews Sweet_

—=—

Here we can see the damning infiltration of Catholic dogma into most other denominated protestants of the Catholic corporation, that of the worship of the sacred feminine, the goddess. In other words, the pope made Mary into a goddess by acting as the replacement for (anti-) God and Christ on Earth, changing the Bible doctrine to fit the worship of the ancient Babylonian sacred feminine. Let us be clear, that by claiming to be vicar (replacement) of Christ on earth, the pope is indeed claiming to be the replacement of the Word of God, or in other words, he that may change the Biblical doctrine as the Word of God. The pope is literally claiming to be the Law of God personified. The Law and the Law maker (God). Get it? The point of the story of Jesus Christ was not that he was merely born pure and unblemished but that he overcame all temptations and remained pure and unblemished. Why? Because all men must become Christ-like. We must all overcome. We must be the bearers (carriers) of the Logos (Law of God). We must be reborn as True followers of Christ, as the sons of God. If this still sounds like nonsensical religion to you, then I can only feel a deep sense of sorrow for you, knowing how easy it is to be lost myself. Yet nothing is harder than convincing others they are acting in the same foolish way that I once did, believing in non-Biblical lies which cause the impossible, empty belief in the non-existence of Existence (Jehovah). But when we read the so-called Hail Mary mantra, we find the True understanding that this is all merely worship of the sacred feminine, of the same Babylonian mythos as always…

—=—

Hail Mary, full of grace. Our Lord is with thee. Blessed art thou among women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb,

Jesus.

Holy MARY, MOTHER OF GOD, pray for us sinners, now and at the hour of our death.

Amen.

—=—

This is not a prayer to Jehovah (God). This is a prayer to the sacred feminine, the goddess Mary (same as Isis, Fatima, etc.) that gave birth to God (Jehovah). When did the mortal Mary become Gods Mother, if God (Jehovah) is the Creator of all? False logos. False gods. But let us not forget, the Catholic doctrine says that Jesus is God (Jehovah) and not merely the Son (Logos/Word) of God. Trinity, you see. So somehow Mary is mother of God and the Son of God at the same time? What happened to have no other gods before Jehovah? This is not the True Logos, this is failed logic (false logos). Most importantly, this is against the Word (Son) of God.

—=—

“TURN YE AGAIN NOW EVERY ONE FROM HIS EVIL WAY, AND FROM THE EVIL OF YOUR DOINGS,AND DWELL IN THE LAND THAT THE LORD (JEHOVAH) HATH GIVEN UNTO YOU AND TO YOUR FATHERS FOR EVER AND EVER: AND GO NOT AFTER OTHER GODS TO SERVE THEM, AND TO WORSHIP THEM, AND PROVOKE ME NOT TO ANGER WITH THE WORKS OF YOUR HANDS; AND I WILL DO YOU NO HURT. YET YE HAVE NOT HEARKENED UNTO ME, SAITH THE LORD; THAT YE MIGHT PROVOKE ME TO ANGER WITH THE WORKS OF YOUR HANDS TO YOUR OWN HURT. THEREFORE THUS SAITH THE LORD (JEHOVAH) OF HOSTS; BECAUSE YE HAVE NOT HEARD MY

WORDS…“

_–Jeremiah 25: 5-8, KJB_

—=—

“Put not your trust in princes, _nor_ in the son of man, in whom _there is_ no help. His breath goeth forth, he returneth to his earth; in that very day his thoughts perish.” _–Psalms 146: 3, KJB_

—=—

“God _is_ not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do _it_? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?” _–Numbers 23: 19, KJB_

—=—

Jehovah (as “God”) is obviously not intended to Exist nor be defined as a man, and certainly was not born of Mary! What can be said about this fanciful doctrine surrounding Mary worship except that it goes against every aspect of what the Bible teaches, yet matches perfectly the Babylonian Creation mythos (_Enuma elish_) and its “mother” god entity? There is only One True God (Reality, Existence), that is Jehovah, to pray to. One does not pray to Jesus Christ, Logos, the Law of God — though many “Christians” have been made so doctrinally ignorant that they’ve been fooled into idolatrously doing so. But the Law of God is not a God unto itself. Jesus Christ is obviously not an “other god.” In fact, there are many instances when it is Jesus Christ that is doing the praying to Jehovah (Father) in the Bible, yet never does the scripture tell us that we are to pray directly to the Christos as if Jesus Christ is God. But then, why would anyone pray to saints or to this false version of the mother of God, unless, that is, they are false “Christians” of the Romanized, Judaized, universal church and state globalist corporate structure? How could religion have possibly gotten so far off course, so far off subject, so far away from the Law (Word) of God unless it was intended to be so by the false gods of church and state in power? Was religion always designed to universally deceive and therefore cause men to reject the Law of Nature? And wasn’t it the Nicene council that created this Trinity doctrine in

the first place?

—=—

No, we’re not false gods, honest! Wikipedia: Icon depicting the Emperor Constantine, accompanied by the bishops of the First Council of Nicaea (325), holding the Niceno–Constantinopolitan Creed of 381

—=—

Amazingly, even within the rewriting of this creed we may see the changes made in just this 56 year period, where even the definition of Jesus Christ was changed. Let’s take a look:

—=—

THE CREED OF NICEA (325 A.D.) _We believe in one God, the Father almighty, maker of all things, visible and invisible; __And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, begotten from the Father, only-begotten, that is, from the essence of the Father, God from God, light from light, true God from true God, BEGOTTEN NOT MADE, of one essence with the Father, THROUGH WHOM ALL THINGS CAME INTO BEING, THINGS IN HEAVEN AND THINGS ON EARTH, Who BECAUSE OF US MEN AND BECAUSE OF OUR SALVATION CAME DOWN AND BECAME INCARNATE, BECOMING MAN,SUFFERED AND ROSE AGAIN on the third day, ascended to the heavens, and will come again to judge the living and the dead; __And in the Holy Spirit._

—=—

THE NICENE-CONSTANTINOPOLITAN CREED (381 A.D.) _We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible; __And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the Only-begotten, Begotten of the Father before all ages, Light of Light, Very God of Very God, BEGOTTEN, NOT MADE; of one essence with the Father, BY WHOM ALL THINGS WERE MADE: __Who FOR US MEN AND FOR OUR SALVATION CAME DOWN FROM HEAVEN, AND WAS INCARNATE OF THE HOLY SPIRIT AND THE VIRGIN MARY, AND WAS MADE MAN;__AND WAS CRUCIFIED ALSO FOR US UNDER PONTIUS PILATE, AND SUFFERED AND WAS BURIED; __And the third day He rose again, according to the Scriptures; __And ascended into heaven, and sits at the right hand of the Father;_

—=—

What’s the difference? The devil is in the details, literally. Let

me show you:

* Birth: Jesus Christ was begotten, not made in the first version, becoming as man on his own, which is in line with scripture. Yet in the altered version Jesus Christ was MADE (formed) into a man by the “Mother” of God Mary in the second Creed, which is in accordance with the Babylonian Creation myth. This places Mary higher than Jesus

Christ.

* Reason: Jesus Christ came because (as a result of) the behaviors of men, because of our salvation. But in the update, Jesus came for (on behalf of) men, for our salvation. This is not at all a subtle difference. The first reason is as an effect, while the second reason is a cause. We are not saved because Jesus was given to us, we are saved because we follow the Law (Jesus Christ). We save ourselves by acting Christ-like, by following the Law of God (Logos). Everything else is just idol worship. * How: Jesus Christ suffered and rose again in the first, but in the second, being Christ was made a man, he was buried as a dead man. In the first version, Christ does not die, because the Law of God (Logos) is not mortal. To cause Christ to be a historical, mortal character is to take away the fact that Christ is the Law of God personified that came about because of men, not for men. Christ was begotten because of men, a Law to govern the actions of men. But the church and state wishes to continue its false reign over us as the false or anti (replacement) Christ, the anointed kings and magistrates and preist-class of the legal realm of mammon. Therefore Jesus Christ was a gift given to them, for they pretend to be the descendants of the Son (Word/Law) of God, and in order to do this Christ must be idolized as a dead man (on earth) so that the false, flattering title of immortal Christ (anointed) may be passed on between mortal men as an office of the false (corporate) church. And so those who continuously point to the Nicene council as a reason for these false doctrines of the catholic (universal) “Christian” church are certainly correct. No such creed is ordered or desired from the Bible doctrine, only that we follow the Law of God (Logos). Ultimately, I cannot stress the importance of this non-Biblical addition of the sacred feminine goddess worship to Christianity, causing the universality of Babylonian false god worship to be publicly accepted while hidden behind the True intent of the Bible. Again, in Genesis, Chapter 1, it is the “Elohim” (translated from the plural word “gods”) that “formed” each listed thing, but not as a new Creation of Jehovah. Form is created after substance. This is further evidence of the dualistic, dumbed-down, Babylonian-tainted story-telling of the Old Testament. And never forget that this phallic symbol of Osiris, the obelisk, is a national monument in many places, the most notable being Washington DC (the Washington monument), the City of London, and of course as the central monument in the Vatican Square. If you think this to be coincidence, you might as well get an “I went to hell on earth, and all I got was this lousy T-shirt” T-shirt. The New Law fulfills the Old Law (testaments). They are not compatible except as what is old and what is new (the later or last/newest being of more authority). Some would call this fulfillment of the Law as the coming of the Messiah, or Logos (personified in Jesus Christ), that fulfills the prophecies of the Old. Same thing, unless you are a Jew (having “interest” in mammon, not Jehovah and Its Logos). But let us return to the logic-based, seemingly endless fractal of the question at hand… who created the creator, _ad infinitim_. Here we delve into the most excellent example of the nihilistic, self-destructive thought pattern, the always limited, circular logic of the artful, humanist mindset. This question is indeed one of those perfect logical fallacies, and it makes the inquirer feel superior in its apparent unanswerableness, though at the same time it proves nothing but the limitations of perception and logic. It is a question we have all either been entrained to ask or have had to deal with in our own utter fascination and frustration. It is nothing more than an obfuscation, a debate question, one asked knowing that the end goal of logical debate (think attorneys) is not to come to the Truthful answer for any question, but to influence the questioner or listening audience into never being able to find or at least agree upon the answer (Truth). That perfect logical fallacy is this: who or what Created the Creator. Who or what Created God? No matter how many times one may answer that question, the same question can then be reapplied as: who or what Created the Creator of the Creator? The nihilist (anarchist) mindset seeks to destroy meaning and appearance, as the connection of symbology, word, or sign to anything Real, and has in many cases succeeded. For while appearance is immortal, meaning is only mortal. Meaning comes from and is preserved by man through culture and religion, and it dies with man, while appearance requires nothing but limited perspective. The clouds make their appearances as all sorts of formed animals, but there is no meaning or reason behind those appearances, only the short-lived perspective of he that watches them continuously morph. But modern society is a sure sign of the twisted success of the nihilist (anarchist), following the successful intervention of the French Revolutionist movement. But most importantly, it is the meaning and purpose of God and Its Law of Nature that has been defeated, lost, destroyed, and thus cast away from our own self-governance. The devises of anarchism have successfully annihilated the meaning and purpose of the Law of God from our minds, from our symbols, from our religions, and from our lifestyles. For there is simply no answer to this circular question of who Created the Creator that can ever satisfy the logician. One cannot find spiritual answers while asking logic-based questions. And yet, the answer is actually quite simple, and more powerful than 100 such nihilistic, destructive inquisitions. The only answer that is Truth is: I DON’T KNOW. When anyone asks why I am so enamored by the Bible, this is what I tell them. Not that I don’t know, but that the Bible tells me its ok to not know, that I should never pretend knowledge about the Universe (Jehovah) that only the Universe (Jehovah) can have knowledge about Itself. I am told that Pluto is a body that exists in space (in the Universe), and yet I can have no actual experiential knowledge myself of that fact. I don’t know, and neither does anyone else. The Bible tells me that one of the highest states of knowledge is to know the limits of what can be known (experienced). If pluto is suddenly shown to be a lens flare, a practical joke, or just a lie, then that will effect me in no way whatsoever, for I have never testified to the Truth of that which I can not actually experience and thus know for certain. All I know for certain is that the Universe Exists, and that if Pluto Exists, it is part of the Universe. I can go no farther than that in what I am able to state the Truth of. Likewise, I can never prove the non-existence of anything. In other words, I can never prove a negative, so there is no point to such a claim of having knowledge of that which does not exist. The atheist claims the non-existence of God, the absolute knowledge that God does not Exist. This is the type of impossible knowledge based on limited logical perception that the Bible warns us to avoid. Yet the same is True when examining the speculations of those that believe a God does exist in various supernatural (outside of Nature) forms, and their claims of a personal relationship thereto. Yet each of these people have different ideas and perceptions of what God Is, from a man in the clouds to all that is good to the various artistic images of Jesus Christ, which are not portraits but simulacrum (copies with no original). No one painted an image of Christ, nor of God. _They_ did not sit down and pose for the painter. This too is the belief in an image without knowledge. Form without substance. Appearance without meaning. For when anyone claims a positive fact, only then must one therefore show proof of that positive claim. Of course, there is no proof of such forms of what God Is, for they are all inventions of the imaginations of men. To each of these, the idea of the most honest answer of _I don’t know_ is inexcusable and unacceptable. And so when I tell people that _I know_ what the Bible “God” Is, their response to my answer is often violent resistance on both sides of the debate. Why? Because my answer is not one given to an unknowable and therefore impossible to answer question. The answer is not given rhetorically nor as one open for debate. I know with utter sureness, and so I answer in that same matter. Why ask the question if you don’t really want the answer, or if you are already certain you have the answer, or if any other answer will disrespect your own perceived best answer? My answer: It is not up to me to decide. “God” is what It is defined to be in the Bible. “God” in the Bible is whatever the author of the Bible intended its meaning to be. Is this not the only actual answer possible? If you ask me what the Hindu or Muslim  scriptural versions of God or gods is my answer will be the same, that is, to seek the intended meaning from the words the author used so that you may understand the purpose, the reason behind the whole story. And if someone asks me whether Robin Hood was a good guy or bad guy, I would tell you to seek that knowledge from the author (creator) of that work, for he and he alone can define the intended meaning of the terms of art he chose to use. Only the author can define what Robin Hood is and what the intent of his story was. The point is that anyone that reads the Bible without knowing the definition of “God” is doomed to failure and misunderstanding. One will never understand the meaning and purpose behind the Bible without knowing how each word is used and intended by the author for the reader to understand. This is a maxim of any and every law, for that matter. It is self-evident. I cannot disagree, for instance, that what the author of Robin Hood says Robin Hood was in his own story is incorrect. Likewise, I am a fool to believe whatever the hell I want to believe when it comes to what the authors of the Bible intended Jehovah to mean. I have no choice in the matter. For if I redefine what is already established, then the story and its intended purpose will necessarily be lost on me. One cannot read anything in comprehension of its intent without knowing first the intention and meaning of its specifically chosen words. This is an unarguable, universal law, even by the anarchist, though anarchistic thought also requires foundational meaning and Law to be destroyed. And so we must hereon endeavor to conclude not what God Is or Is not, but what God Is defined as by the authors of the Bible so that we may know how to attain meaning and purpose from the Bible. And yet we must also recognize that, because for centuries the Bible was kept out of reach from the common man, that the Kings transliterations and use of purposefully obfuscating mistranslation are designed to cause the causal reader to fail. The kings words must be examined in each verse to ensure clear understanding of pre-translated intent. And the litmus of self-evident Truth must always be present in our study, knowing that while poets use fables and lies to metaphorically, allegorically relay spiritual Truths, evil men use those lies to deceive, to conceal, and to cause men never to attain the Truth. Remember, the king (and pope) is a false legal god in charge of a false legal law. Never forget this Truth. By establishing what the word “God” means in the Bible, and therefore what the word “Logos” means by the intent of its authors, we may establish here whether it is in fact change or permanence that defines what is to be worshiped as the Supreme Being, as the One, Living, eternal God. Jehovah (God), the Father of Logos (personified in the Bible as Jesus Christ), is of course a VERB specifically defined as that substance which is _UNCHANGING_, as the _unchanging_ _Universe, not a being but the act of Being (Existence)_ as the_ Supreme Being, _the ultimate VERB (action) of all Natural self-Existence in and of Itself. While some men may look at the earth only skin deep and say, _see, the skin burns, quakes, fissures, floods, and over time changes, and so therefore the entire structure and Design of the Universe must also be in constant change (chaos)_, while in the next sentence they will refer to one of many of the absolutely predictable (harmonious) elements of Jehovah (the Universe) to prove the same theory. The scientific predictability and therefore forecastable-ness of the sun, the moon, the planets, the stars, and even the basic seasons each year seem to be at best immune from or a pesky annoyance to the idea of a changing (chaotic) Existence. Predictability (harmony) is the essence of the Law of Nature, not only in the heavens but as the foundational Law for man to follow above all others. It is the very unchanging permanence of the Law of God, the Law of Nature, that causes it to be the Highest, and therefore above all manmade inventions of legalism in engineered societies. This Law of (belonging to) Nature and not of man, in the Bible, is referred to as _Logos_. And, as clearly shown in my 1st book, the words _Law_, _Word_, and _Son_ all bear the same meaning in their highest consideration. In other words, Jesus Christ is Logos personified in the Bible. Jesus Christ is the Word (Law) of God put into an allegorical story for all men to follow. And so the Son of God is the Word (Law) of God personified. I cannot explain the importance of even this simple contemplation between a noun and a verb, that is, God as a person, place, or thing (noun) versus God as the very Life-force and Existence of all things as One. Jesus tells us in his own words that he is not to be worshiped, that he is not the Source of Law, only the example of one that follows it. For, of course, it is self-evident that Jesus Christ (_in the flesh_) would certainly take no other doctrine than the Word of God, the Truth, nor create any of his own. Again, the Son is not the Father, as that which is sent is not the sender:

—=—

“Jesus answered them, and said, MY DOCTRINE (_LAW_) IS NOT MINE, BUT HIS THAT SENT ME.” _—John 7:16, KJB (synonym (Law) added by myself for clarity)_

—=—

“WE ABUSE LAND BECAUSE WE REGARD IT AS A COMMODITY BELONGING TO US. WHEN WE SEE LAND AS A COMMUNITY TO WHICH WE BELONG, WE MAY BEGIN TO USE IT WITH LOVE AND RESPECT.”

_―Aldo Leopold_

—=—

So what does it mean then to worship this secondary, re-invented (by men) notion of _logos_ (as logic) in idolatry instead of the self-evident Creation and Law of Jehovah (God) as it already Exists in self-Evidence? What happens when that which is Eternal is instead considered to be alterable, when what is Permanent is instead worshiped as temporary, when what is the Perfection of the Design of Nature is thought instead to be unreasonable, illogical, or just not good enough, and when what ought to be Sacred is instead considered to be opposed to such qualifications of sacrosanctity? What happens when Logos (Law), in other words, is confused as that which is a temporary contemplation of man instead of the permanent Son (Word/Law) of God? Look around at this utterly failing, immoral, unlawful society and you will see the quite evidentially-based manifestation of the answer to

this question.

Perhaps we have another, deeper, more pressing cultural identity crisis instead, that being the importance of the influence of ancient Greek culture and philosophy upon the human authors of the Bible, with an honorable mention to the Romans that copied much of it. Like today, the Roman culture was shallow and superficial, not merely based on status and wealth but specifically the artificial simulation of symbols and art that projected such social status. When we peal back the surface of our modern society, especially when we examine the lavish, non-christ-like decor, art, and other illusions of wealth of many churches, we find that like then that today we adorn cheap, imitation copies of Greek architecture and cultural items. We worship the simulacrum, the copy built and worshipped without any substance or meaning to its original. For example, we read: “In the late fourth century B.C., the Romans initiated a policy of expansion that in 300 years made them the masters of the Mediterranean world. IMPRESSED BY THE WEALTH, CULTURE, AND BEAUTY OF THE GREEK CITIES, VICTORIOUS GENERALS RETURNED TO ROME WITH BOOTY THAT INCLUDED WORKS OF ART IN ALL MEDIA. SOON, EDUCATED AND WEALTHY ROMANS DESIRED WORKS OF ART THAT EVOKED GREEK CULTURE. TO MEET THIS DEMAND, GREEK AND ROMAN ARTISTS CREATED MARBLE AND BRONZE COPIES OF THE FAMOUS GREEK STATUES. MOLDS TAKEN FROM THE ORIGINAL SCULPTURES WERE USED TO MAKE PLASTER CASTS THAT COULD BE SHIPPED TO WORKSHOPS ANYWHERE IN THE ROMAN EMPIRE, WHERE THEY WERE THEN REPLICATED IN MARBLE OR BRONZE. ARTISTS USED HOLLOW PLASTER CASTS TO PRODUCE BRONZE REPLICAS. SOLID PLASTER CASTS WITH NUMEROUS POINTS OF MEASUREMENT WERE USED FOR MARBLE COPIES. Since copies in marble lack the tensile strength of bronze, they required struts or supports, which were often carved in the form of tree trunks, figures, or other kinds of images. “ALTHOUGH MANY ROMAN SCULPTURES ARE PURELY ROMAN IN THEIR CONCEPTION, OTHERS ARE CAREFULLY MEASURED, EXACT COPIES OF GREEK STATUES, OR VARIANTS OF GREEK PROTOTYPES ADAPTED TO THE TASTE OF THE ROMAN PATRON. SOME ROMAN SCULPTURES ARE A PASTICHE OF MORE THAN ONE GREEK ORIGINAL, OTHERS COMBINE THE IMAGE OF A GREEK GOD OR ATHLETE WITH A ROMAN PORTRAIT HEAD. THE MEANING OF THE ORIGINAL GREEK STATUE OFTEN LENT BEAUTY, IMPORTANCE, OR A HEROIC QUALITY TO THE PERSON PORTRAYED. By the second century A.D., THE DEMAND FOR COPIES OF GREEK STATUES WAS ENORMOUS—besides their domestic popularity, the NUMEROUS PUBLIC MONUMENTS, THEATERS, AND PUBLIC BATHS THROUGHOUT THE ROMAN EMPIRE WERE DECORATED WITH NICHES FILLED WITH MARBLE AND BRONZE

STATUARY.

“SINCE MOST ANCIENT BRONZE STATUES HAVE BEEN LOST OR WERE MELTED DOWN TO REUSE THE VALUABLE METAL, ROMAN COPIES IN MARBLE AND BRONZE OFTEN PROVIDE OUR PRIMARY VISUAL EVIDENCE OF MASTERPIECES BY FAMOUS GREEK SCULPTORS. ALL THE MARBLE STATUES IN THE CENTRAL AREA OF THE MARY AND MICHAEL JAHARIS GALLERY AT THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM ARE COPIES MADE DURING THE ROMAN PERIOD, DATING FROM THE FIRST CENTURY B.C. THROUGH THE THIRD CENTURY A.D. THEY REPLICATE STATUES MADE BY GREEK ARTISTS SOME 500 YEARS EARLIER DURING THE FIFTH AND FOURTH

CENTURIES B.C.”

_—Department of Greek and Roman Art, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, “Roman Copies of Greek Statues.” In Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2000– (October

2002)_

—=—

Let us be clear, here, that “the Met” just admitted that their Greek statues are all simulacrum, copies with no original to possibly verify their accuracy. They are Roman fakes! And yet isn’t the real point here that we in Europe and America have followed in the footsteps of Rome and thus live today in a giant statuary of false idols and symbology without source? Are we not Rome before its famed fall? Are we not acting as much without God’s Grace and Law as they? So how do we qualify these facts with our own empty, plastic culture, complete with even plastic Christmas trees and crucifixes and statues (idols) of Mary, with this patriotically garnished Americanism politically and culturally being mostly a simulacra of not only itself but of the Roman (and Plato’s) republic, making American culture merely a copy of that which was an already empty, meaningless copy of the original; a simulated lie based on the forgotten meaning of some other culture’s symbols? At this point in our ridiculously empty culture, we may simply shop at the many Walmart-type discount and dollar stores where we find such poorly plastered copies of statues of supposedly ancient origin, in our choice of plastic, styrofoam, or some other artificially invented material not found in Nature. The closest thing to art we use marble for today is to cut it into kitchen and bathroom countertops on assembly lines or attached as the faux surface of some downtown bank buildings’ wall. We, just as the Romans in their spiritually empty bread and circus culture, seek symbols and architecture directly plagiarized from ancient cities and religions not in any way christ-like. We take what Nature provides and squander it like devil-spawned children. Everything from our Christmas trees to our ornamental statuaries stems from the paganish Roman holidays as we celebrate every year our accomplishments of spiritual emptiness. We worship in our own imagery, adultery, and idolatry everything but Nature, everything but the Truth of God’s Creation, and at Christmas, everything but Logos (Jesus Christ). We revel in symbology not our own, pretending it to bring luck or stature that simply does not exist in Reality. We are for all intents and purposes a dumbed-down version of the Roman archetype. ARCHETYPE – _noun_ – 1. THE ORIGINAL PATTERN OR MODEL OF A WORK; OR THE MODEL FROM WHICH A THING IS MADE; as, A TREE IS THE ARCHETYPE OR PATTERN OF OUR IDEA OF THAT TREE. 2. Among minters, THE STANDARD weight, BY WHICH OTHERS ARE ADJUSTED. 3. AMONG PLUTONISTS, THE ARCHETYPAL WORLD IS THE WORLD AS IT EXISTED IN THE IDEA OF GOD, BEFORE THE CREATION. _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the American Language)_

—=—

_The world as it existed before Creation…_ The world was an _idea_ of an external God, not a Natural outgrowth of the Universe and Its Law(s)? Sounds like _Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy_ to me. Sounds a bit like an oxymoron, a paradox, doesn’t it? How can anything exist before it is created? To believe in this type of logical rhetoric, one must believe exactly what modern “Christian” religions teach despite the Bible — that God is separate and outside of Nature, outside of the Universe, outside of Creation, that Creation was a historical event, and that Christ is unattainable by men as a historical character. This is a logical, literalist nightmare. Let us take the celebration of “Christmas” as a perfect example of this empty, Plutonic type of reasoning that has completely infiltrated the Romish culture of so-called Christian nations, especially the United States. Is anything about the secular celebration of Christmas every year not a monument to satanic behavior? Is any part of Christmas not a lie, as the supposed celebration and Worship of Christ (Christ Mass)? Is Christmas not the ultimate simulacra, a celebration of the opposite of the very namesake of that supposed holy day?

—=—

Where is Christ at Christmas? Does the timeless Christ really have anything to do with Christmas? Do you really think the timeless Jesus Christ celebrates birthdays according to the legal, Roman calendar (the fiction of men)? And just what are you causing your children to worship and emulate at

Christmas?

Because I guarantee you Christmas is not teaching the Law (Son) of

God!

Logos is certainly absentee from Christmas.

Must watch!

—=—

Notice that the little girl is praying to the Christmas devil Krampus to forgive her sins. And do we not pray to judges (false gods) when we go to court for a lesser punishment against the legal (anti-God) law? Praying to and worshiping antichrist, in other words, that which is opposed to God, seems to be what “Christians” have been tricked into doing as their religious traditions and holidays, false holy days. This is an obvious conclusion when examining the American culture. And this includes praying to Jesus Christ as a god/idol instead of (anti) to Jehovah, the One True God. So why do we call Santa father Christmas against God’s Law? By the way, there is no “birthday of Christ in the Bible. Not in December, and not in September. In fact, the term birthday really should be known to you that celebrate them, especially your own, because in the intent of its meaning you are actually worshiping your own spiritual death, creating it as a holy day unto your own rebirth as a slave (goyim) of the pagan nations. From Strong’s concordance we read that the word birthday as used in the Bible is “a birthday celebration, a birthday feast – the earlier Greeks used this word of funeral commemorations, a festival commemorative of a deceased friend.” The truth is that you have been socially conditioned to worship your own birth and that of others before Christ, and in much more grandiose celebration and inebriation. Remember, men are born in Nature and reborn thereto through Christ (Logos/Law). Only persons are birthed into the legal system. Birthdays are Roman pagan holidays, all about the recognition of the ego, the self as bonded property in surety to the state, of the day you were legally placed into adulterous, spiritual death (person-hood). Keep in mind that the controlled use of simulacra, the copy without referential to its original, is a very powerful tool in political and spiritual control of the ignorant masses. And so while we believe the non-Biblical idea that Jesus Christ was a historical figure born on an already well-established, specific Roman holy day, we are tricked into morally debasing ourselves with the pagan customs surrounding these pagan gods, while at the same time believing we are somehow celebrating the birth of Christ. This is especially ironic because everything we do at “Christmas” time is strictly antichrist, or in other words, against the Law of Nature (Logos). This brilliant marketings strategy by the combination of satanic forces involved in the governing, manufacturing, retail, grocery, banking industries has completely overcome any rational patterns of thought or worship of Source. Christmas, without irony, is today nothing more or less than the celebration of mammon (the money system and false valuation). It is the literal mass-sacrifice of living pine trees, whole forests of God’s Living Creation pointlessly (Satanicly) cut down and dressed up in idolatrous fashion. This is the opposite of stuardship, of dominion, of being the protectorate of Gods wondrous Creation and

intricate beauty.

But what about the rest of the year? We revel in nothingness, worshiping pleasingly adorned and impressive looking statues and pictures upon money that are in Reality but empty and meaningless, misrepresentative gargoyles of ancient men we know nothing about posed in a form that is so far removed from their origin, purpose, and Truth that they have become likened to gods; legends falsely immortalized through plaster molds and casts of other, previous gods from some other simulation of culture. Hell, even the casts and busts of famed president George W. Bush will cause his appearance and disposition to be worshiped by future generations as wise and noble, as the great Romish actor of our time. In other words, everything in our culture has been Romanticized. The droll nature of Reality has been enhanced and made super to (above, outside of) what actually existed, that is, if _it_ or _they_ every really existed at all. And so the tales of history and historical characters and lawmakers have been Romantically simulated in our modern nomenclature. Our minds have been filled with Hollywood archetypes that are ultimately only simulacra, poor copies of previous idealistic copies of much less than Christ-like men (their personas/masks), places, and things, which have never actually Existed as their copy portrays them. There are no great men, only lawful and unlawful ones. Nothing else really matters. It would be insane to consider the authors of the Bible as immune from these same cultural and social influences of the day, as well as the simulated history that came before their own times. And so perhaps in Christianity we have not so much a Roman problem, but instead what amounts to a _Plato_ problem, an Aristotle problem, an ancient, pre-Biblical Greek philosophy problem, where like the wacky and moldable toy by that same name (Play-dough) has replaced the Word of God (Logos), twisting and mixing the Bible Word up with what is the modern, non-Biblical, secular teachings of these old polytheists of perceived logic (false logos). Indeed, Encyclopedia Britanica explains the influence of “Platonism” when examining Paul’s Biblical

stylings as such:

“WELL BEFORE THE BEGINNING OF THE COMMON ERA, JEWS WITH SOME GREEK EDUCATION HAD BEGUN TO MAKE CASUAL USE OF POPULAR GREEK PHILOSOPHY IN EXPOUNDING THEIR REVEALED RELIGION: THERE ARE TRACES OF THIS IN THE WISDOM LITERATURE OF THE HEBREW BIBLE. In the New Testament, Paul the Apostle’s speech to the Areopagus (Acts 17) USES COMMONPLACES OF STOIC PHILOSOPHY FOR APOLOGETIC PURPOSES. But, as far as is known, THE FIRST JEW WHO WAS REALLY WELL-READ IN GREEK PHILOSOPHY AND USED IT EXTENSIVELY IN THE EXPOSITION AND DEFENSE OF HIS TRADITIONAL RELIGION WAS PHILO JUDAEUS (Philo of Alexandria )… THE ESSENTIAL POINT AT ISSUEBETWEEN PLATONISTS AND THEIR OPPONENTSTHROUGH THE CENTURIES HAS BEEN THE EXISTENCE(IN SOME SENSE) OF A SPIRITUAL OR INTELLIGIBLE REALITY THAT IS INDEPENDENT OF THE WORLD,AND IS THE ULTIMATE ORIGIN OF BOTH EXISTENCE AND VALUES. This is a very rough generalization that does not apply to the Skeptical Academy (see above Greek Platonism from Aristotle through Middle Platonism) or do full justice to the thought of the 20th-century skeptical Platonist George Santayana. PLATONISTS HAVE UNDERSTOOD THIS CENTRAL DOCTRINE IN A GREAT VARIETY OF WAYS AND DEFENDED IT WITH A GREAT VARIETY OF

ARGUMENTS…”

_–Encyclopedia Britannica online, entry for Platonism, and Evaluation of Platonism_

—=—

Reality beyond reality? God beyond God. Heaven beyond Life? Could it be said that modern, organized “Judaeo Christianity” (antichrist influenced Christianity) is more akin to Platonism and other Greek and Roman philosophies, as the belief in a realm or being (second God) outside of Nature (outside of Jehovah), and thus the separation of Jehovah (Nature/Existence) from the Creation of (belonging to/part of) Jehovah? In other words, are we practicing a belief that has at its foundation the separation of Law (i.e. Jesus Christ) from its Source? Is this why Christians have been fallaciously taught that when they die they will go to some unknown, undefined “Heaven,” so that we can never realize such a heavenly paradise here on Earth (Source)? Is not that the perfect way to make a slave, and to cause most men to disregard the Law of God’s Nature because heaven is only obtainable by physical death from this Earth? Yet, one must ask, for what reason would the Bible be written as a book of Law, specifically the Law that applies exclusively to this realm of Nature, to the Universe (God) Itself, and specifically for the men and other Creatures Living here, if all that matters is some transcendence from this realm to another one with different Laws? Never mind that the Bible does not mention the word or notion of an afterlife? Such mis-transliterations of what the symbolic word death, heaven, and hell means are well-documented in my first book, taken from the lexicons and concordances. Does one not have to take pause when one considers that every religion of man in the world always promises heaven if we only cooperate with the tyrants of this current life in legalistic, logic-based hell? Work 8 hours, play 8 hours, sleep 8 hours, and observe national (legal) holy days. Does this not describe every religion? Yet where can we find this in the Law? It is the pope that defines the sabbath, and it is said that he who decides what is the sabbath day is he that controls the world. Yet this is the remnant of Jewish, secular law. The Logos (Law) is that every day is to be kept as Sabbath. Why? Because there is no day, no night, no year in the Universe. The Law of God does not depend on the cycles of the stars, planets, and moons, but rather is the very Source and causality of their self-Existence and Natural Design of movement. Creation does not control the Creator. Only men have such delusions that we may alter for the better the Blessings of God’s Nature. In the Bible, the word _day_ can mean an _age_ as well as a _day_, depending on its spiritual or secular use and meaning, which we must all have the due diligence to pursue. God is not restrained by the days of the Roman calendar, for God (eternal Existence) is of course timeless, and so too is the Sabbath _day_. What is Sabbath to God is not the same as what is the sabbatic, secular legalisms, customs, and state-religions of men. Again, see my first book (Page 880) for a discussion on the “sabbath day” or σάββατον, or (sabbaton) as a secular day of the calendric week, as opposed the spiritual, capitalized word it

is taken from.

In fact, to my utter delight and joy, it is written that Jesus Christ defied the sabbath day of the Jews and legal gods, for it was not of Jehovah. This is never spoken of in organized religion, for that false “Christianity” is itself secular, legal, corporate, and is the causality of men’s acceptance of these false legal holidays (false holy days of the church and state). So let us read and cheer as Christ defied this false _sabbaton_ to express the timeless and boundless day (Age) of the Sabbath of God! Remember, the kings purposeful translation yet again placed the secular word and the spiritual word together as the same translation. Therefore, how may any one possibly know the difference, for the priest of the corporate church is as the blind leading the blind. Here we find the ultimate in spiritual activism against the powers of the legal church and state…

—=—

“AT THAT TIME JESUS WENT ON THE SABBATH DAY THROUGH THE CORN; AND HIS DISCIPLES WERE AN HUNGRED, AND BEGAN TO PLUCK THE EARS OF CORN,

AND TO EAT.”

_–Matthew 12:1, KJB_

—=—

“AND IT CAME TO PASS ON THE SECOND SABBATH AFTER THE FIRST, THAT HE WENT THROUGH THE CORN FIELDS; AND HIS DISCIPLES PLUCKED THE EARS OF CORN, AND DID EAT, RUBBING THEM IN THEIR HANDS. AND CERTAIN OF THE PHARISEES SAID UNTO THEM, WHY DO YE THAT WHICH IS NOT LAWFUL TO DO ON THE SABBATH DAYS?AND JESUS ANSWERING THEM SAID, HAVE YE NOT READ SO MUCH AS THIS, WHAT DAVID DID, WHEN HIMSELF WAS AN HUNGRED, AND THEY WHICH WERE WITH HIM; HOW HE WENT INTO THE HOUSE OF GOD, AND DID TAKE AND EAT THE SHEWBREAD, AND GAVE ALSO TO THEM THAT WERE WITH HIM; WHICH IT IS NOT LAWFUL TO EAT BUT FOR THE PRIESTS ALONE?” _—Luke 6: 1-4, KJB_

—=—

“AND THEY WATCHED HIM, WHETHER HE WOULD HEAL HIM ON THE SABBATH DAY; THAT THEY MIGHT ACCUSE HIM.“

_–Mark 3:2, KJB_

—=—

“THEN SAID JESUS UNTO THEM, I WILL ASK YOU ONE THING; IS IT LAWFUL ON THE SABBATH DAYS TO DO GOOD, OR TO DO EVIL? TO SAVE LIFE, OR TO

DESTROY IT?”

_—Luke 6:9, KJB_

—=—

“OR HAVE YE NOT READ IN THE LAW, HOW THAT ON THE SABBATH DAYS THE PRIESTS IN THE TEMPLE PROFANE THE SABBATH, AND ARE BLAMELESS?“ _–Matthew 12:5, KJB_

—=—

“AND HE SAID UNTO THEM, WHAT MAN SHALL THERE BE AMONG YOU, THAT SHALL HAVE ONE SHEEP, AND IF IT FALL INTO A PIT ON THE SABBATH DAY, WILL HE NOT LAY HOLD ON IT, AND LIFT IT OUT? HOW MUCH THEN IS A MAN BETTER THAN A SHEEP? WHEREFORE IT IS LAWFUL TO DO WELL ON THE

SABBATH DAYS.“

_–Matthew 12:11-12, KJB_

—=—

“AND HE WAS TEACHING IN ONE OF THE SYNAGOGUES ON THE SABBATH.“ _–Luke 13:10, KJB_

—=—

To be clear, in each of the above verses this purposefully mis-transcribed word _sabbath_ is actually, originally written as _sabbaton, _based on the Jewish calendric legal system. What else would one expect from the vicarious, antichrist gods of the temporal church and state? For the kingdoms of men would crumble without the Word of God (Logos) being twisted by logicians into the legal word (false logos) for the masses to follow. It is, in fact, without any logic or reason and certainly without spiritual consideration that we worship Sundays and holidays, which are inventions of men, and call these legal, corporate “days” as sabbath. For on what day, what week, what month, what year, what age would Jehovah declare to men that they should not follow the Law of Nature (Logos)? It makes no sense, not that religion has to make sense, unless you are a dictator (false god/magistrate) and therefore require that the Law of God should not govern us at every moment and in every endeavor we partake in, but that instead we should follow false, legally appointed replacement (vicarious) gods. What fool can possibly believe that Nature would be ok with us polluting and destroying It 6 out of 7 days of the week? That God would be ok with us acting secularly 85% of our lives, as long as we abstain from work and commerce on Sundays? Or that the Jewish and Roman calendar is a work of God? Do you really think the Universe (God) rested on the 7th day of… what? Did the planets stop revolving? Did life cease to exist on that day? Is the power and spiritual benefit of the metaphor so lost on modern folks that we cannot grasp the reason behind it? Or is it that we have been tricked into separating the notion of God from that which it is defined as, as the Universe Itself? How can the Universe, all of self-Existence, suddenly come to a rest, like a record or movie slowing to a pause for a day and then suddenly restarting Itself. Does the entirety of Existence, the Universe, the Highest substance that Is God need rest? LOL! For those willing to take the plunge, you will discover that the Genesis (Book of Moses) account of so-called Creation story is actually the Babylonian Creation mythology (Hebrew: _Enuma elish_), and that it was the plural gods (elohym) of the world of men (nation-builders/legalists/logicians) that needed rest, not Jehovah. “Jehovah” does not appear in genesis until Chapter Two of that book. See my 1st book (page 370) for more on this, and how most Biblical scholars agree that there are two separate creation stories therein. We’ll cover what is the meaning of the word _Creation_

shortly…

Perhaps logic (liberal art), science (Natural art), and technology (technical art) has so entangled the minds of men that our ability to spiritually reason and see or sense Truth (Reality/Source) is long dead, which means that a poem or story can only be judged thereby according to its logical evaluation in cultural society, by the extremely limited perceptions of the secular human mind? Humanism… Godlessness. Detachment from Source. Let us contemplate this for a moment, for this artful, humanist, pagan mindset may certainly sit at the very root of the problem… Could it be that most corporate Christians are more familiar (indoctrinated) with Platonic and other Greek and Hellenic philosophy-based rhetoric and limited logical conclusion regarding the Nature of Logos in these modern, false religions than the Bible itself? I’ve certainly heard “professors” of the liberal arts claim that their circular mathematical equations and solutions are equal to what God is or is not, as if God is a math problem provided for us to figure out. Are we, in other words, being conditioned and taught the philosophy of the elitist, polytheistic (pagan) men and their ancient bloodlines regarding Logos, or are we being immersed in what the Word (Law/Son) of God actually is from the Bible? (_Hint: the Bible is banned from most public schools_). PLATONISM – _noun_ – THE PHILOSOPHY OF PLATO, CONSISTING OF THREE BRANCHES, THEOLOGY, PHYSICS AND MATHEMATICS. UNDER THEOLOGY IS INCLUDED MORAL PHILOSOPHY. The FOUNDATION of Plato’s theology is the opinion that THERE ARE TWO ETERNAL, PRIMARY, INDEPENDENT AND INCORRUPTIBLE PRINCIPLES OR CAUSES OF ALL THINGS, AND MATTER, FROM WHICH ALL THINGS ARE MADE. It was a fundamental maxim with him that from nothing, nothing can proceed. While therefore he held God to be the maker of the universe, he held matter, the substance of which the universe was made, to be eternal. _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)_ PLATONIC – _adjective_ – PERTAINING TO PLATO THE PHILOSOPHER, OR TO HIS PHILOSOPHY, HIS SCHOOL OR HIS OPINIONS. Platonic love, is a pure spiritual affection subsisting between the sexes, unmixed with carnal desires, and regarding the mind only and its excellencies; a species of love for which Plato was a warm advocate. Platonic year, the great year, or a period of time determines by the revolution of the equinoxes, or the space of time in which the stars and constellations return to their former places in respect to the equinoxes. This revolution, which is calculated by the precession of the equinoxes, is accomplished in about 25, 000 years. _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)_ PLATONICALLY – _adverb_ – AFTER THE MANNER OF PLATO. _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)_ PLATONISM, PLATINIZE – _verb intransitive_ – TO ADOPT THE OPINIONS OR PHILOSOPHY OF PLATO. – _verb transitive_ – To explain on the PRINCIPLES OF THE PLATONIC SCHOOL,OR TO ACCOMMODATE TO THOSE PRINCIPLES. _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English

Language)_

—=—

How many people say their relationship is _Platonic_ without having a clue as to that word’s origin? Love but no sex, no actual carnal knowledge, distant contemplation without experience, as the false Masonic “brotherhoods” of secret societies and other elitist

organizations.

So it was a theory, or rather, a philosophical opinion of Plato that there are two gods, as two eternal, primary, independent and incorruptible principles or causes of all things and matter? Is this ancient guru where the false doctrine of “Christ as God” stems from? Is this what Christians inadvertently worship: Plato’s logic as logos? It certainly is not in the Bible. Can these two patterns of thought be mixed and confused and still retain their individual uniqueness, or can Christianity be at peace with both? Or are unwitting, self-proclaimed “Christians” merely practicing the ancient philosophies and mystery religions of old, of that which the New Testament strives to repair? Indeed, we find the answer by looking closely at Freemasonry: …PLATO OBSERVED THAT THE STUDY OF THE UNIVERSE INVOLVED THE ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT VOLUMES, AS ALL THAT IS IN THIS WORLD, FROM THE SMALLEST ATOMS TO THE LARGEST ITEMS, CONSIST OF VOLUME. WHEN HE STUDIED EACH SHAPE (TRIANGLE, SQUARE ETC) HE CONCLUDED THAT ONLY 5 SHAPES REMAIN COMPLETELY EQUAL REGARDLESS OF THE ANGLE THEY ARE VIEWED FROM. THESE SHAPES WE KNOW AS “THE FIVE PLATONIC SOLIDS” AND ARE DESCRIBED IN DETAIL IN HIS ‘TIMAEUS.’ THE FIVE SOLIDS REPRESENTED THE FOUR BASE ELEMENTS OF THIS WORLD (FIRE, AIR, WATER, EARTH) PLUS THE FIFTH, BEING HEAVEN, SERVED TO REPRESENT THE UNIVERSE AS A WHOLE. MATHEMATICIANS HAVE LONG UNDERSTOOD THAT THESE FIVE POLYHEDRA ARE THE ONLY GEOMETRIC CONSTRUCTS THAT ARE ABLE TO EQUALLY DIVIDE THREE-DIMENSIONAL SPACE, AND THIS UNDERSTANDING REPRESENTED THE ESSENCE OF ANCIENT GEOMETRIC AND ESOTERIC KNOWLEDGE (A SPHERE ALSO MAY EQUALLY DIVIDE SPACE, BUT AS IT HAS NO FACES, EDGES, CORNERS OR DEGREES, IT WAS NOT CONSIDERED TO BE A SOLID). THE SEAL OF SOLOMON AND THE FIVE ELEMENTS: ON A CURSORY EXAMINATION, WE WOULD NOT NOTICE THE FIVE PLATONIC SHAPES PRESENT WITHIN THE SEAL OF SOLOMON, BUT WHEN WE COUNT THE NUMBER OF RIGHT-ANGLES, THEIR PRESENCE BECOMES APPARENT. WE NOTE THAT THE NUMBER OF RIGHT-ANGLES IN THE TRIPLE TAU (THE KEY), AND A MULTIPLE OF IT, ARE EQUAL TO COMBINATIONS OF THE TRIANGLES IN THE SEAL OF SOLOMON. HENCE THE TRIPLE TAU, OR KEY, “UNLOCKS” THE SEAL OF SOLOMON TO REVEAL THE FIVE PLATONIC SHAPES, JUST AS OUR 24 REDUCED FIBONACCI NUMBERS PLACED IN A CIRCLE ALSO GENERATE THE FIVE SOLIDS BY WAY OF THEIR INTERACTION. CLEARLY THIS MASONIC ROYAL ARCH KEY SERVES TO UNLOCK EXACTLY THE SAME SECRET WE HAVE DISCOVERED WITHIN THE 24 REDUCED FIBONACCI NUMBERS. THE TRIPLE TAU AND THE 90 DEGREE RIGHT-ANGLES. EXAMINING THE FORM OF THE TRIPLE TAU, WE CAN NOTE THAT IT IS COMPRISED OF 8 X 90 DEGREE ANGLES, WHICH IS IN TURN EQUAL TO A VALUE OF 720 DEGREES. THEREFORE, THE NUMBER OF DEGREES IN A TRIPLE TAU IS EQUIVALENT TO 8 X 90 DEGREES = 720 DEGREES. _”It contains eight right angles, and is used as a measure or mnemonic whereby the Platonic Solids can be calculated.

_

_TAKEN ALONE, IT IS COM­MENSURATE WITH THE TETRAHEDRON, THE SIDES OF WHICH, BEING FOUR EQUILATERAL TRIANGLES, ARE TOGETHER EQUAL TO EIGHT RIGHT ANGLES, BECAUSE THE INTERIOR ANGLES OF ANY TRIANGLE ARE TOGETHER EQUAL TO TWO RIGHT ANGLES. IT IS SAID THAT THIS SOLID WAS USED BY THE PLATONISTS AS A SYMBOL OF THE ELEMENT FIRE._ _TWO OF THESE KEYS ARE EQUIVALENT TO THE OCTAHED­RON, WHICH CONTAINS SIXTEEN RIGHT ANGLES, AND WAS CON­SIDERED TO REPRESENT AIR. THREE KEYS ARE COMMENSU­RATE WITH THE CUBE, THE SIDES OF WHICH CONTAIN TWENTY-FOUR RIGHT ANGLES; THIS FIGURE WAS SUPPOSED TO TYPIFY EARTH, BECAUSE IT IS OF ALL THESE FIGURES THE FIRMEST AND MOST IMMOVABLE UPON

ITS BASIS._

_FIVE OF THESE KEYS GIVE US FORTY RIGHT ANGLES, WHICH ARE EQUAL IN AMOUNT TO THOSE CONTAINED IN THE TWENTY EQUILATERAL SIDES OF THE ICOSAHEDRON. THIS SOLID WAS TAKEN TO EXPRESS THE ELEMENT WATER._ _The remaining Platonic Solid, called the Dode­cahedron, has for its sides twelve regular pentagons.

_

_IT IS A RULE IN GEOMETRY THAT THE INTERIOR ANGLES OF ANY RECTILINEAR FIGURE ARE EQUAL TO TWICE AS MANY RIGHT ANGLES AS THE FIGURE HAS SIDES LESS 4 RIGHT ANGLES; THUS THE INTERIOR ANGLES OF A PENTAGON ARE 10 – 4 = 6 RIGHT ANGLES; THEREFORE THE DODECAHEDRON IS CONTAINED BY SEVENTY-TWO RIGHT ANGLES, AND CONSEQUENTLY IS REPRESENT­ED BY NINE KEYS. SO IT WILL BE SEEN THAT THIS KEY IS THE GREATEST COMMON MEASURE OF ALL THESE PLATONIC SOLIDS, AND THAT IS WHY ON THE SCROLL ROUND IT IN THE JEWEL OF  THE HOLY ROYAL ARCH DEGREE WE FIND THE LATIN PHRASE: NIL NISI CLAVIS DEEST, “NOTHING IS WANTING BUT THE KEY”, TEACHING US ON THE ONE HAND THAT WITHOUT THE INNER KNOWLEDGE ALL THESE SYMBOLS ARE BUT LIFELESS, AND ON THE OTHER THAT, GREAT AS IS THE TEACHING GIVEN, THERE IS YET MORE TO BE FOUND AS WE MOVE ALONG ON THE PATH OF

MASONIC PROGRESS._

_THERE IS A METHOD BY WHICH, BY SUB-DIVIDING THE TRIANGLES AND THE SEAL OF SOLOMON INTO SMALLER TRIANGLES AND ADDING UP THE TOTAL NUMBER OF DEGREES FORMED BY ALL THEIR ANGLES, WE CAN YET AGAIN WORK OUT THE NUMBER OF RIGHT ANGLES EQUIVALENT TO THOSE OF THE PLATONIC SOLIDS._ _THIS PROCESS IS COMPLICATED, AND IS OF LITTLE PRACTICAL VALUE, SO I DO NOT GIVE IT HERE; ALTHOUGH IT IS TRUE THAT THE PLATONIC SOLIDS HAVE A PROFOUND MEANING IN CONNECTION WITH THAT PROCESS OF DIVINE CREATION, UPON WHICH THE DEGREE OF THE HOLY ROYAL ARCH CONTAINS SUCH PRICELESS

TEACHING.”_

–QUOTE BY C.W. LEADBEATER.

—=—

Are shapes (geometry) in or worshiped in the Bible? NO. Is the measure of the Universe (Jehovah) by volume instructed in the spiritual Law of Nature through Christ? NO. Are mathematics present in Nature? NO. Math is a language which describes emptiness. It is form without substance. It is manmade. Terms like “sacred geometry” have fascinated men for centuries. So too might a 1,000 piece puzzle fascinate a nursing home patient. The difference? Intent. One does not generally worship a puzzle nor call it sacred, for puzzles are invention of men. And even the dementia patient doesn’t believe the puzzle (representation) to be the Real thing (Truth) pictured therein. To believe the Universe is mathematical is to believe that a math equation solved by man is God. To put it another way, one does not worship the puzzle, which is a mere picture (form without substance) of Nature (Reality), as if it were actually the Real thing. This worship of numbers as the formal structure of the Universe (God) is no different than any other idol worship. And yet this making sacred of numerology is part and parcel of these societies of their own secrets. The Bible does not implore men to keep knowledge secreted from others. In fact, it recognizes that only those wishing to control others would keep secrets. It is not that they know anything about God (Nature), only that they pretend their knowledge is of God (Nature). The devil(s) controls through deceit. To be clear, none of the above Platonic references are self-evident Truths. They are not part of Nature, and the atrociously built cities of men are certainly proof of man’s worship of mathematical precision, grotesque skyscrapers and candy-cutter housing developments that could not be constructed without the geometric proportions of man’s design. One cannot point to anything in Nature and say look, there is a square, there is a triangle. These concepts are made of words, not substance. Because a pile of dirt is formed in a square fashion does not make it a _square_ or a _cube_, but just a pile of dirt. The form does not alter the substance. Platonism, as most “sacred” inventions of men, and including this modern confusion called corporate “Christianity,” is based upon idolatry, the worship and holding sacred of symbols and organized words. This modern “Christianity” as with all organized religion is but a simulacrum of itself, a copy that has little or nothing to do with its original Source. When the symbol becomes custom, when it is seen in form but without any substance behind it anymore, then the symbol becomes an idol. Likewise, when geometry is considered as sacred over that which it represents symbolically, then, like religion, the emptiness of the symbol becomes the banner of war, the justification to break all of the Laws of Nature, to satisfy the fallacious appeal and false history of the idol. The idol is thus turned against its progenitor, as the cross has beed turned against the meaning and intent of Jesus Christ. The church has been turned against God, for the modern church is only that which is built by hands (by men), whereas the True church of Christ exists only as the name of a People that follow the Law of God (Logos). A church is not a corporation. A church is not a building or temple. A church consists only of the blood and faith of men. And this church and this church alone is where Logos is realized, self-actualized, and is the Highest

Law.

So where is this Church? We are lost, scattered, and clamoring to find each other against all odds. We are obstructed by the system of mammon, lost in the sciences and other liberal arts of men, believing that our salvation lies within those hypoxic institutions. This academic, syndicalist organization of the sciences is no different than the universal organization of corporate, institutionalized Christianity. For even the term science is become as an idol, a simulacra of its own identity, an excuse to break the Laws of Nature only to attempt to exploit and improve on the perfection of Nature’s Design. Just as the flatteringly titled “scientist” identifies and justifies his actions against God by that empty word, in the name of science, so too does the “Christiain” justify his daily, hourly sin, the breaking of God’s Law through that empty name (form without substance). Let’s face it, the title of Christ is used today as nothing more than a mark of being (acting) antichrist, a license to sin, to commit crimes against Nature, and to pretend oneself to be sacred. We are empty, walking symbols of Christ, pretending to be copies thereof while leaving the Logos (Law) completely unfulfilled. But how can we know that we’re acting with or adversarial (satanic) to God if we all have given ourselves _carte blanch_ to define God in our image, by our own imagination, and by our own set of justifications? How can there be harmony with God if It remains a mystery? How can we be a church (like-minded, lawful people) if we all believe differently in the form of God without ever comprehending the

substance?

First we must define the Highest usage of the translated word “God” in the Bible, as that which is supposed to be held Highest above all else, and thus above all other gods. We must know exactly where it is that Logos (Christ) emanates from, lest we treat Christ as a second god. The use of the term Jehovah (_YHVH, Jah, Yah, Yĕhovah, Yahweh,_ Etc.) is the only time that this word is used as A VERB representing the Supremacy of all Being (self-Existence) rather than a mere flattering, empty title (noun/name) bestowed upon mortal men (kings, magistrates, archons, elohym, etc.). In fact, _JEHOVAH_ AND _JESUS CHRIST_ ARE SPECIFICALLY NOT THE SAME TERMS NOR CHARACTER NOR SPECIES nor do they in any way carry the same meanings, though the word “Jesus” is relatively, purposefully translated in Strong’s Concordance (#G2424 – _Iēsous_) to the term_ “JEHOVAH IS SALVATION.”_ The word Christ, or Strong’s Concordance (#G5547 – _Christos_), has the meaning of _“anointed,” _as one being spiritually anointed by the “Gladness of God” (translation: Jehovah). To be clear, Christ is not a surname. Christ is not Jesus’s last or family name, for the Son of God knows and participates in no such vulgar, legal customs of man. The synonym of anointed is to be _blessed_, while its antonym is to be _cursed_. Christ is, of course, therefore blessed by God. But let us be clear here that the Christ (Anointed Son) never blesses God. In other words, the Law (Son) never pretends to be higher than its Creator (Father). The Law is not nor can it be the Creator of Jehovah (the Universe, all in self-Existence). This is not a plexor or a chicken-or-the-egg type of riddle. Without the Universe (God) there in fact could be no Law of the Universe (God). The Law of Nature emulates from God (the Universe), not God from the Law. The Law (Son/Word) is not God, It is of (belonging to) God. Logos is not God.

—=—

“Blessed _be _the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly _places_ in Christ…” _–Ephesians 1:3, KJB_

—=—

Jesus Christ never blesses, for Christ never pretends to be God as priests and popes do. Christ is Blessed (Anointed) by his God and Father (Jehovah) and acts as God’s vessel, as should we all according to Christ’s example. Christ is not therefore to be worshiped as Jehovah, or for that matter as any form of secondary or replacement God. Christ does not equal Jehovah. Christ is a gift given by Jehovah (God); a blessing to all men if they may choose to follow His allegorical story, therefore choosing to remain (be meek) under God’s Law of Nature and no other. Christ is OF God, not God Itself. The word _OF_ means belonging to, and it is written that Jehovah, not Jesus Christ, gives all blessings. What Christ projects in his words and character is not the law of Jesus Christ, not the law of man, but is the Law of God (his Father), as Christ distinctly repeats throughout the Bible. We are not to pray to Christ for blessings of for that matter for anything at all, for Christ is already a blessing to us from Jehovah, and this would be (is) idol worship and is absolutely opposed to the Bible. We are not to pray to Christ, for we are to pray to God and God alone, taking no other gods before Jehovah, as we are commanded. This seems self-evident, yet the corruption of the church abounds, and false, idolatrous Christ-worship is now completely out of hand. In other words, we have already turned our false perception of Logos into a secondary God. We worship a false idol and pretend it to be the intention of the allegorical story of Jesus Christ, while at the same time completely ignoring the Word of God, which Jesus Christ is the personification of. To be the Law of God personified and thus exemplified for men to follow is the entire reason and purpose of the Biblical story of Jesus Christ. This is the True Logos. We are Biblically instructed to exemplify the one and only Christ (Law/Logos) of the Bible to attain the Grace of God by example (by following the personified Law of God), but nowhere does the Bible tell us to falsely worship Christ as an external, personal or impersonal idol (false, secondary god). To follow the Word of God (Logos) that is personified in the story of Christ is opposite of the empty worship of Christ’s name and title in this modern, artful form in idolatry that has infected most so-called “Christian” religions. The Bible is clear… to worship (believe in) Christ in mere symbolic idolatry is to act in an antichrist behavior.

—=—

“FOR BY GRACE ARE YE SAVED THROUGH FAITH; AND THAT NOT OF YOURSELVES: _IT IS_ THE GIFT OF GOD: NOT OF WORKS, LEST ANY MAN SHOULD BOAST. FOR WE ARE HIS WORKMANSHIP, CREATED IN CHRIST JESUS UNTO GOOD WORKS, WHICH GOD HATH BEFORE ORDAINED THAT WE SHOULD WALK IN

THEM.“

_–Ephesians 2:8, KJB_

—=—

Unfortunately, this verse is commonly used in the logical fallacy of “faith without works.” That is to say that the unregenerate, unread corporate “Christian” is taught that somehow one can follow Jesus Christ (Law) without actually doing anything but professing a vulgar belief in the story of Christ as a literal history. Imagine that, a Law that need not be followed for one to be Lawful, a savior that needs not be followed to be saved by It. This is ridiculous. What this is trying to teach is that through Christ we cannot help but do good works, for that is the state of grace that automatically befalls a son of God, a follower of the Law, WHICH REQUIRES GOOD WORKS. And yes, it is certainly true that any man may pretend good works, for even the devil (darkness) will pretend to be the Light. It is very easy, in other words, for bad men to call themselves as “Christians” and falsely prove (pretend) their faith by doing otherwise spiritual good works with no empathy or good intent at all, as the politician simply wishing to be seen in church to qualify his public persona, or the banker masquerading as a “Christian” on Sundays while dealing in money (the root of all evil) the rest of his Roman-calendric business days. We are Gods workmen. We are the delivery system of Love, Charity, Forgiveness, and Good Will. These cannot be known unless manifested by men through our Good Works. This verse only makes sense when we do our due diligence and see that the word-term _Christ Jesus_ holds the meaning that “Jehovah is salvation,” which is why we find Christ constantly demurring to his “Father” as the One and only Source of his words, his wisdom, and his purpose of intent. When we walk with Christ, we necessarily walk in the example of what is Good Works, yet have no need to speak of them in vanity, no need to prop ourselves up, only others. Thou shalt _worship_ and _serve_ no other God. (Exodus 34:14

). Cant get

much clearer than that! When we scour the Bible for proofs of this, we certainly find it, and without exception. For these are the words of Jesus Christ:

—=—

“Then saith Jesus unto him, Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and HIM ONLY shalt thou serve.“ _–Matthew 4:10, KJB_

—=—

“And Jesus answered and said unto him, Get thee behind me, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and HIM ONLY shalt thou serve.“

_–Luke 4:8, KJB_

—=—

“Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father.“

_–John 4:21, KJB_

—=—

“For we are the circumcision, which WORSHIP GOD in the spirit, and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and HAVE NO CONFIDENCE IN THE FLESH.“ _–Philippians_ _3:3, KJB_

—=—

Please note here this incredible last statement, as it destroys the notion that one should worship Christ as God in the flesh. We are told in the Bible that JESUS IS TO BE CONSIDERED _IN THE FLESH_. And yet here we find the Highest Law that we are to _HAVE NO CONFIDENCE IN THE FLESH_. Is this paradoxical? Is it a contradiction of some sort? No. Of course not. There are no contradictions but by the false interpretations and in the desired false doctrines of men. It’s just that most people do not put these pieces together in proper metaphor, allowing a false, corporate religion to spell it out falsely for them. And so what does it mean then to the story of Jesus Christ if we are not to have confidence in the flesh that we are to consider him in? Here again, we must define terms and consider this subject both spiritually (poetically) and literally. Firstly, let us state clearly that the expression of confidence is always a personal, individual emotion or state of being. The con man, or _confidence man_, for instance, must first gain your trust before he can use your false confidence in himself to rob you blind. The magician’s illusions are only as good as his audiences confidence that magic exists and that the magician is practicing it. And even the historian that lived not one day in the history he so confidently reports must fill his storied past with his own deluded descriptions of what his perception of living in that historic time was like. And when that always false history is turned into a film, the film is judged and given awards not by its accuracy of historical sequence, for that is impossible even for the historian to judge, but is instead given “Accadamy Awards” for best (imaginary) costume, best cinematography, best music, and best ACTING (best professional liar). This makes about as much sense as the fact that sports are the most important and financially lucrative aspect of universities, lower colleges, and high schools. Likewise, the wealthy “Christian” evangelist on television and even your local priest is very much a confidence man, not an illusionist but a dillusionist, very much unlike Christ Jesus was in his allegoric, moral, truth-telling character. Therefore the “for-profit” evangelist must first achieve a sense of false confidence (trust) in his or her listeners, as parishioners, before he can convince them that God’s kingdom needs money (mammon) to continue_ in the flesh_, that the “father” of that secular church needs a new, private jet. This is the type of confidence (idol worship) that the followers of Christ are not supposed to succumb to if they only follow God’s Law of Nature personified in Christ, which inversely is exactly what most corporate religions require, that of idol worship and open satanism (adversarial-ness) towards the Law written in the Bible. Nothing harms my own spirituality and psyche more than having to ask openly for donations so that I can barely eat healthy and survive in this legal system while I try and do this work and give it freely so that we may all find the exit, but I am in no possible position to “practice what I preach” and also continue on this path of discovery. My visits to the thrift stores for clothing, books, and shoes keep me grounded that I am only one step away from the homelessness I witness there, a fact that can only be remedied by returning to the debt-slavery of human capital management in mammon. I pretend no excuse for my disposition, being as content as possible, keeping the faith and confidence in Jehovah, trying to live through the Christos (Logos) as much as possible in this legal hell, and can only hope my works prove not only my intent but perhaps some day justify my lifestyle and the judgement and ridicule I bare because of my choices, my sacrifices. I choose the life of a martyr, if you will, living in this strange, false _existence_ a spiritually dead legal person caught up in my own corruption, so that I may help others (and hopefully myself) to find the path and become the remnant, the meek, the sons of God. I’ve little support nowadays, for as the Bible warns, you too will be persecuted for telling the unwanted, unrequited Truth of Gods Word (Logos), that is, True Christianity without religious nonsense. Yet I ask for no confidence by you, or anyone, only that you judge my words as True or false by verifying them both literally and spiritually, letting them turn over in your mind without prejudice and _with eyes to see_. And as the world (flesh) becomes more covered with technology and institutionalized, satanic “sciences” and syndicalist, educative lies, I would wish my life, my burden and its disposition upon no man, for it often feels like being voluntarily, spiritually entrapped in some extremely twisted version of purgatory. But I digress…

—=—

“I AND MY FATHER ARE ONE…” “IF I DO NOT THE WORKS OF MY FATHER, BELIEVE ME NOT.” _—John 10: 30 and 37, KJB_

—=—

Membership (including citizenship) to anything, especially toward religions and bodies politic (municipal corporations) is in essence a publicized certification of devotion and confidence. To have confidence in any one or any thing is to put faith and trust into that collective (fictional) thing itself. This is an external worship of empty form alone, a trust that the substance beneath that form is one in the same. Most of us have either been convinced to put confidence in Christ (i.e. the “second coming”) against the Bible or have instead turned away from religion and therefore the Bible for this reason, the outright evangelically-based lie as a completely non-Biblical (literal) notion that Jesus Christ will return to Earth (in the flesh?) to save us all that believe (have confidence) in Him. Not only is this patently ridiculous on so many levels both spiritually and physically, but it is obviously the main confidence game of corporate religion, of popes and of kings (magistrate gods). It is the ultimate offering of false, perpetually unfulfilled hope. All the planets (gods) and symbols of the zodiac are also considered as the “returning gods,” and as Pisces is about to exit, the age of Aquarius will surely follow. Circular, orbital logic. Another Babylonian copy. To materially worship something is not at all the same as spiritually or religiously (in action) worshiping something. Jesus Christ must be actualized in every man. Manifested. To spiritually Worship God, as Jehovah, we were given the “how to” example to follow in Christ. In other words, to worship God, we must act at all times Christ-like, which means to follow the Law of Nature (God). We are not to worship Existence (Nature) without Being part of it, the Creation, and it is ridiculous to worship anything without following its Law. Nowhere does the Bible tell us to put confidence or worship into the Existence of Law as an idol, but to follow it wholeheartedly and with all your body, mind, and soul without exception or lame excuse. For what use, what purpose, what GOOD is a Law that is not followed? Again, to have confidence in Jesus Christ is to treat the Law of Nature as one might treat a street thug carrying a gun — with false, useless respect except to save yourself. To follow religiously in our daily actions according to Christ as the example of God’s Law is the meaning of “believing” in and respecting the Reality of the Nature of Jehovah, not the tales of an empty, historical figure (form without substance) known as Jesus

Christ.

—=—

IF YE LOVED ME, YE WOULD REJOICE, BECAUSE I SAID, I GO UNTO THE FATHER: FOR MY FATHER IS GREATER THAN I.” _—John 14: 28, KJB_

—=—

“JESUS ANSWERED, IF I HONOUR MYSELF, MY HONOUR IS NOTHING: IT IS MY FATHER THAT HONOURETH ME; OF WHOM YE SAY, THAT HE IS YOUR GOD…”

_—John 8:54, KJB_

—=—

“…AT THAT DAY YE SHALL KNOW THAT I AM IN MY FATHER, AND YE IN ME, AND I IN YOU. HE THAT HATH MY COMMANDMENTS, AND KEEPETH THEM, HE IT IS THAT LOVETH ME: AND HE THAT LOVETH ME SHALL BE LOVED OF MY FATHER, AND I WILL LOVE HIM, AND WILL MANIFEST MYSELF TO HIM. JUDAS SAITH UNTO HIM, NOT ISCARIOT, LORD, HOW IS IT THAT THOU WILT MANIFEST THYSELF UNTO US, AND NOT UNTO THE WORLD? JESUS ANSWERED AND SAID UNTO HIM, IF A MAN LOVE ME, HE WILL KEEP MY WORDS: AND MY FATHER WILL LOVE HIM, AND WE WILL COME UNTO HIM, AND MAKE OUR ABODE WITH HIM. HE THAT LOVETH ME NOT KEEPETH NOT MY SAYINGS: AND THE WORD WHICH YE HEAR IS NOT MINE, BUT THE FATHER’S WHICH SENT ME… _—John 14: 20-24, KJB_

—=—

Over and over we find Jesus Christ demurring to his Father, to Jehovah, that no man should put confidence in Christ lest his words are self-evidently of his Father, and specifically to make clear that Jesus Christ is not Jehovah, only the vessel and instrument used by Jehovah to teach the Law. It doesn’t get much clearer than this. What Jesus speaks as the Word of God (Law/Logos) is not coming from Jesus Christ, but from God through Jesus Christ. Metaphorically, Christ is like a telephone call. You either receive its words or you don’t. The choice is and always will be yours to make. Inversely, one would need to be a fool to not have confidence in (not to believe in) Jehovah (Existence). For the Fear of God is the respect of Gods Law. To respect God is to treat all of Creation, all of Nature, as one Living Being in Supremacy, and specifically therefore to follow and respect at all times Its Law. The fear of God is only a fear in what happens when the Law of Nature (Logos/Jesus Christ) is not followed. This is not just pagan nature worship without consciousness, this is the worship of the very Source (Nature) of Life and all True (self) Existence. To Love and protect Nature is the action of worshiping God. To follow the Law of God as that which guides our actions in Love and protection of Nature is the True Life of a Christian, Living and acting at all times in Truth. Therefore the persecution of Christians is actually the persecution of Truth and Truth-tellers. But Truth-tellers actually following Christ (Law) should never be confused with the spiritually empty vessels calling themselves even as the corrupted Romans did, as modern, corporate “Christians” that live and breathe only by the man-made legal system and in respect only of its false gods (magistrates of nations/states, etc.) and in mammon. The difference is one of exactness. “Christianity” has been turned into its opposite, into open satanism, (adversarial-ness to the Law and Nature of God) while paying imaginary homage and respect to the legal law of the land and its lawmakers and false judges (gods). And as agenticly acting artificial persons (corporations) created by the legal system of the nation, religions are by their nature (legal source) absolutely in opposition with the Word of God (Logos). For nothing artificial is a Creation of Jehovah. God’s kingdom is not made with or by the hands of men. God requires full knowledge and Faith through Jesus Christ (the Law of God personified as Logos), while religions require only the ignorant confidence of men in their false doctrines and fictional “fathers.” But most importantly, the word Jehovah as God is known to us, defined, self-evident all around us, and not the mystery that religions promote. This is not my opinion, for the Bible says it is

so:

—=—

“GOD THAT MADE THE WORLD AND ALL THINGS THEREIN, SEEING THAT HE IS LORD OF HEAVEN AND EARTH, DWELLETH NOT IN TEMPLES MADE WITH HANDS; NEITHER IS WORSHIPPED WITH MEN’S HANDS, AS THOUGH HE NEEDED ANY THING, SEEING HE GIVETH TO ALL LIFE, AND BREATH, AND ALL THINGS; AND HATH MADE OF ONE BLOOD ALL NATIONS OF MEN FOR TO DWELL ON ALL THE FACE OF THE EARTH, AND HATH DETERMINED THE TIMES BEFORE APPOINTED, AND THE BOUNDS OF THEIR HABITATION; THAT THEY SHOULD SEEK THE LORD, IF HAPLY THEY MIGHT FEEL AFTER HIM, AND FIND HIM, THOUGH HE BE NOT FAR FROM EVERY ONE OF US…“ _–Acts 17:24-27, KJB_

—=—

Again I must stress here that this is not the description of some old man in the clouds or a burning bush, these being allegorical anthropomorphisms used to tell the Bible story, just as the Law of God is anthropomorphized (personified) into Jesus Christ to tell our story and direct our path. This is telling you that God is known to you, undeniably, not some religious creation but the obvious and self-Existent Being that is all things in Oneness and harmony. There is nothing to believe or not believe in, there is only the love or non-love of what already Exists, or more accurately, what is all of self-Existence, that which is not man-made (of this world). The reader of the Bible is never given a choice, because the definition of God is that which is self-evident, or more vulgarly, a description of everything that science (the study of Nature) can ever possibly discover. To not believe in Jehovah is nihilism. And such non-belief actually requires a secondary god, an alternative belief in something that is not self-evident, that has no available or visible proofs, and is not at all what Jehovah is defined as, strangely enough. In other words, it takes more effort to create a story and image in ones head so as to not believe in the false God one has self-created than to simply understand and accept what is by default all of Existence as One Being. To not believe in what already Exists is way more bonkers than anything religions can come up with! And so we have two notions of confidence, one in Truth (what is of Jehovah) and one in Truth’s adversary (what is man-made): CONFIDENCE – _noun_ –  1. A TRUSTING, OR RELIANCE; AN ASSURANCE OF MIND OR FIRM BELIEF IN THE INTEGRITY, STABILITY OR VERACITY OF ANOTHER, OR IN THE TRUTH AND REALITY OF A FACT. IT IS BETTER TO TRUST IN THE LORD, THAN TO PUT _CONFIDENCE_ IN MAN. Psalms 118:8

. I rejoice

that I have _confidence_ in you in all things. 2 Corinthians 7:16 . Mutual _confidence_ is the basis of social happiness. I place _confidence_ in a statement, or in an official report. 2. TRUST; RELIANCE; APPLIED TO ONE’S OWN ABILITIES, OR FORTUNE; BELIEF IN ONE’S OWN COMPETENCY. His times being rather prosperous than calm, had raised his _confidence_by success. 3. THAT IN WHICH TRUST IS PLACED; GROUND OF TRUST; HE OR THAT WHICH SUPPORTS. Israel was ashamed of Beth-el their _confidence. _Jeremiah 48:13

. JEHOVAH

SHALL BE THY _CONFIDENCE. _Proverbs 3:26

. 4. SAFETY,

OR ASSURANCE OF SAFETY; SECURITY. They shall build houses and plant vineyards; yea, they shall dwell with _confidence. _Ezekiel 28:26

. 5. BOLDNESS;

COURAGE. Preaching the kingdom of God with all _confidence. _Acts

28:31

. 6. EXCESSIVE

BOLDNESS; ASSURANCE, PROCEEDING FROM VANITY OR A FALSE OPINION OF ONE’S OWN ABILITIES, OR EXCELLENCIES. THEIR _CONFIDENCE_ ARISETH FROM TOO MUCH CREDIT GIVEN TO THEIR OWN WITS._ (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)_

—=—

Jehovah shall be thy confidence. Trust Jehovah, not men. Trust not in

the flesh.

Hmm. So where does that leave Jesus Christ — the supposed man come

in the flesh?

Houston, we have a problem here… It’s simple. I have confidence that Jehovah provides all that I need to Live. If I pollute the clean water that Jehovah provides through Natural biological cycles then I am obviously in contempt of that which assures my own Life cycle. Thus my confidence in what Jehovah will provide for me on this Earth is not enough, for in over-confidence like today’s society I begin to abuse these systems as if they will last forever. Jehovah must be protected by us, from us. Thus the Son of Jehovah, that is, the Law of Nature was (ALLEGORICALLY) given to us by the Living God so that the testament of the Living God could be expressed to us through the death of a testator. The Living God cannot die to pass on its will, lest we all die with It. Thus the Son was sent (as a parable) to die for us, or in other words to deliver the Law and show us how to follow It so that all of Jehovah, including man, may Live in harmony with all the rest of Gods Creation. To take this as a literal story destroys the purpose of telling it. To understand this as a parable designed to teach a moral story and Law is the Divine purpose of telling it. Again, I will elaborate on this in my next post, providing Bible sources in evidence. For now we only need have empathy for God’s disposition, in that Jehovah created man into the eternal Universe and in order to deliver the Law of Nature in terms man could comprehend. God sent his Son to show us the way, not to die but to be reborn, and thus to leave a will and testament, so that Nature Itself does not die from man’s lawlessness. I happen to think this is a beautiful allegory that only a fool would dismiss because it isn’t True according to his own measures of perception and logic. Most stories told to teach a moral lesson or Law are not of Real people, nor are religions set up to worship those fabled characters as if they were Real and historical characters and events. Because this has happened with the story of Jesus Christ does not take away from the story itself, it only proves the story by showing how foolish men are and how easily they can be tricked by confidence men in fancy robes and royal headgear. In other words, the story of Christ is ironically designed to keep people out of religion and in to worshiping and protecting all of Nature as God. The story proves itself and the power of its Law in today’s world simply because men are completely ignorant of the intent and meaning of the story and thus the Law. But I believe that some day men will stop putting confidence in Jesus Christ and start acting the part themselves, following the Law of God, and thus rejoining our place in Its Nature. I have to believe this because the only alternative is our own utter destruction of ourselves and our ability to Live in Nature. And that’s what keeps me doing what I’m doing against all these daily poverties, criticisms, and persecutions by fools. To put this another way, considering that in England and in the early colonies (States) it was unlawful to speak poorly or in criticism of the Bible story, Christ, and Jehovah, we must realize that it was this way in most other cultures as well, and in some modern countries it still is. One did not blaspheme Isis, Baal, Marduk, or the fabled gods of Greece and Rome because they were the backbone of the story of the Law, storied moral (and immoral) anthropomorphisms of very Real human conditions. The Bible story is no different in this regard. In fact, I’d say this current cellphone “selfie” society could use an injection of the moral story of _Narcissus_, wouldn’t you agree? It was not so much that people believed in the gods as much as they respected the fact that the story of the gods was the authority behind the unwritten law. Today, most people believe in the presidents and kings of nations, but have forgotten the god or gods that were used to justify the creation of those kingdoms and false flattering titles in the first place. For every king and every country is created in the name of “God,” whatever that “God” be in reference to. Without God, without the Bible story of Christ, the United States cannot continue to pretend it has the justification of God to exist not Gods authority and protection behind it, as all the so-called founding _fathers_ and other architects of the States united and their masonic constitutions conceded in their personal and literary writings (papers), their lame excuses to become slave-holding tyrants of their

own company farm.

It certainly can be said that in order to trick men into giving their confidence unto the false safety and security of (legally created) nations, the founders of those nations must convince men that each nation is somehow, impossibly, without scriptural backing, pretended to be ordained by “God,” meaning whatever _God_ pertains to that private people. Yet every nation at some point wars with the other somehow “in the name of God,” never acting in the Peace and Law of God. This is again non-Biblical false doctrine, that is, it is paradoxically opposed to the New Testament of God’s Law. Nations, and all other corporations legal or ecclesiastical, are of the realm of man’s fiction, which is never that of God’s Kingdom or Realm and Source of Nature. Nations are the literal creator of the entire system and currency and credit/debt instruments of money (mammon). Any confidence put in any nation is always according to its currency and place in commerce (mammon). Nations and religions are the epitome of the worldly manifestation of the confidence game. The entire backbone and foundation of this legal system of nations is in fact to get us all to publicly declare and confirm our incompetency. No competent man needs an attorney, and to hire an attorney causes one to become a ward of the court — an imbecile, legally speaking. He who cannot govern his own mind under the Law of God through the example of Christ is a man of no confidence to the State and its false gods (judges). In other words, Nations thrive only when their common masses of populations are ignorant of the Bible, meaning that they are ignorant of how to self-govern their own minds, bodies, and souls. Only goyim are citizens of nations (fictions).

—=—

“…FOR NOT THE HEARERS OF THE LAW _ARE_ JUST BEFORE GOD, BUT THE DOERS OF THE LAW SHALL BE JUSTIFIED. FOR WHEN THE GENTILES, WHICH HAVE NOT THE LAW, DO BY NATURE THE THINGS CONTAINED IN THE LAW, THESE, HAVING NOT THE LAW, ARE A LAW UNTO THEMSELVES: WHICH SHEW THE WORK OF THE LAW WRITTEN IN THEIR HEARTS, THEIR CONSCIENCE ALSO BEARING WITNESS, AND _THEIR_ THOUGHTS THE MEAN WHILE ACCUSING OR ELSE EXCUSING ONE ANOTHER…“ _–Romans 2:13-15, KJB_

—=—

Indeed, we find the root of the word Gentile to be from the word nation, for only he that does not follow Christ can be caught up in any legal system of law. GENTILE – _noun_ –  In the scriptures, A PAGAN; A WORSHIPPER OF FALSE GODS; ANY PERSON NOT A JEW OR A CHRISTIAN; A HEATHEN. The Hebrews included in the term GOIM ORNATIONS, all the tribes of men who had not received the true faith, and were not circumcised. THE CHRISTIANS TRANSLATED _GOIM_ BY THE LATIN _GENTES_, AND IMITATED THE JEWS IN GIVING THE NAME GENTILES TO ALL NATIONS WHO WERE NOT JEWS NOR CHRISTIANS. IN CIVIL AFFAIRS, THE DENOMINATION WAS GIVEN TO ALL NATIONS WHO WERE NOT ROMANS. – _adjective_ – PERTAINING TO PAGANS OR HEATHENS._ (–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)_

—=—

Many or most of us, acting as the common plebes of the nations, believe we are acting Christ-like despite the fact that hardly any of us follow the Law of God that Christ exemplifies for us to follow. We have no idea how we have been tricked into being Gentiles, Goyim, as slaves to a legal system of law that is diametrically opposed to and antichrist to God’s Word (Logos). We are literally born (birthed) into it. Our god is mammon. We worship money as if it is more Real than Reality. We have re-valued every part of God’s Creation, every individual thing in self-Existence in Nature, and put a price upon it in money, into a system of mammon, and nothing could be more blasphemous to Jehovah than rooting every thing to money, the source of all evil. What is priceless under God has been marked by a price in mammon, including ourselves and our children. We believe we are that which we are not because we have broken the Law of God and allowed the false, flattering title of “Christian” to be placed upon our lifestyle of utter disrespect of God’s Law of Nature, which requires us to respect no persons, including of men and of corporations (artificial persons), including cities, counties, states, and nations. All persons are fiction, and all fiction is opposed to Nature. No Law of God will ever support any law of man, nor will any Law of God support a fictional creation of man, especially one that is a legal state or state-sanctioned religion. Nothing legal is of God, only man. Legal law is the confidence game made strict and permanent, so that it seems so Real in its enforcement that, like watching television 24 hours a day, man forgets his blessed connection with his Source, thus forgetting he has a choice to instead follow the Highest Law of God over any of man’s false recreations.

—=—

“ASSEMBLE YOURSELVES AND COME; DRAW NEAR TOGETHER, YE THAT ARE ESCAPED OF THE NATIONS, THEY HAVE NO KNOWLEDGE THAT SET UP THE WOOD OF THEIR GRAVEN IMAGE, AND PRAY UNTO A GOD THAT CANNOT SAVE.” _—Isaiah 45:20, KJB_

—=—

The modern “Christian” has no knowledge of who or what built the cross and alter they worship to (probably a Chinese company in a country that outlaws the Bible and Christianity as a threat to Communism, or even more ironic, a Jewish owned business. LOL!) For he that expresses his faith to an empty symbol or trinket necessarily does so to a god that is a creation of man, not God. One cannot attain the awesomeness and slender and Grace of Nature (Jehovah) while disillusioned by a talisman of no connection thereof, and one certainly cannot commune with God (Jehovah) while in a false church (artificial temple) made by the hands of master masons (men). On that note, remember from my first book that the word “sacred” has a duel meaning, for what is _sacred_ to evil men, to that evil genius of men that worship greed in mammon is that which is accursed to and by Jehovah. Sacred means cursed when that which is being held as sacred is not of God (Nature), when it is a false idol of what is Real, a symbol without True Source. For God is Truth, and so only what is of Truth should be held as sacred. This is yet another foundational self-evident Truth, being therefore part of the Law of God not because I say it is so, but because what is self-evident cannot be defeated by the contrarian, conflicting, empty words and devices of men. For words are also but symbols of what is Reality, and so like all symbols, they are easily constructed into lies, into copies without an origin or Source (simulacrum). And what is the great simulacrum of the Babylonian Creation myth (Genesis)? That man was created in the image of Jehovah. This mis-transliteration serves to cause men to believe and propagate that same myth of the Hamarabian Code, that God is as a man, and that man can rule Nature (Jehovah) in the stead of Logos — that is, without and in spite of the Law of Nature. This is the underpinning foundation of presidents, kings (queens), and popes. And through their unnatural teachings, so too has the modern man become as the “many antichrists” warned about in the Bible. To deny the Law of God is to deny Jesus Christ, which by definition (not opinion) is antichrist behavior.

—=—

“Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, EVEN NOW ARE THERE MANY ANTICHRISTS; whereby we know that it is the last time.” _—1 John 2:18, KJB_

—=—

“Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? HE IS ANTICHRIST, THAT DENIETH THE FATHER AND THE SON.“ _— 1 John 2:22, KJB_

—=—

Note the words Father and Son are capitalized. Their meaning is therefore specific, yet translated by the king only with this clue of capitalization (a capitanym) as to their special meanings. For while men may become the sons of God by following the Son (Law/Word) of God, no man is THE Son. No man is the Law, but all men may fulfill the Law as the story and example of Chirst (the Son/Logos.) Even the most untrained, uneducated, or unregenerate man must be able to reasonably understand what is being said here, despite the propagandist evangelism of the church and state. This is not telling us to vulgarly believe in our minds the “history” of _the Father (Jehovah) and the Son_. If you are honest with yourself you will see that any perceived history of Christ is worthless. The story is told to pass on the Law, not any historical fact. It is and has been this way in every society and tribe from the dawn of man’s understandings of such things. Belief is pointless when that which is the object of belief is Truth. What place or effect can belief have upon that which is already Existent and unchanging? But here is where logic escapes us, for we are entrained to take this literally as the false image (i.e. the image of men), mistaking Jesus Christ and God Itself to be after the image of men, since man was apparently created in the image of God. Talk about a ridiculous logical fallacy!!! It is only the lack of definition of Jehovah that we cannot see the foolishness of suggesting that “the Universe,” that the Nature of Existence Itself is modeled after the image of man. In some cultures, this type of thought would land you in the loony bin, or possibly elevate you to some cult leader of dictatorial status. Yet this is how “Christians” have been conditioned to contemplate God — in the image of themselves. Thus we have the false logos that is built upon the logical conclusions and perceptions of men. Instead of the Law of God, we are entrained into the logical fallacies of insane men that we call as _gods_ and _fathers_. To deny Christ is to deny the Law of God, which by necessity is a denial of God. One cannot claim to respect one’s Father while at the same time completely disobeying all of his Father’s Rules. Thus, to claim some empty belief in God (as Jehovah) while practicing nothing but the legal, anti-God (antichrist) law of men is patently ridiculous. Yet “Christianity” in its modern form is exactly that, form without substance, a God that cannot save. For if you haven’t figured it out by now, God does not save men, only following God’s Law (Jesus Christ/Logos) saves men. In other words, we may only save ourselves by acting Christ-like, by worshiping not in the false confidence of the cross but by following Jesus Christ as the personified example of the Law of Nature (God). It is our choice, the very reason behind the doctrine of Free Will. We may choose legal (artificial) hell, or we may choose the Grace of God (Truth). There are only these two Choices. Obviously, we have chosen the big legal lie. We have chosen open anarchy toward God (Truth), a socially accepted form of satanism masked by the false Christian doctrines of our greatest adversaries, of men that seek to be our anti- (replacement) gods. And so we have become the antichrists we were warned about. I believe this can change, that we can overcome mans trickery and deceits, but only if we first admit ourselves to be the problem. For we must remember that the devil can only make an offer to contract. It is us that must fulfill that contract. It is us that must sign in the name of an artificial, legal persona (mask). We lie to ourselves most of all. Our legal person is our rented, insured, personal satanic vessel, which stores and carries (bares) all blemishes, all marks, numbers, names, flattering titles, and other crimes against Nature (Truth). Our person is our registered trademark, a mark that we are beasts, traders in the legal commerce of mammon, as traitors to our Source (True Creator), the lovers instead of money and

not God.

To further clarify what this word _worship_ means and how it is used either spiritually or fallaciously in legalism (fiction) and idolatry (religion), let us define terms clearly. For this word worship has its roots in the notion of value or worth, a term of mammon, and therefore through false worship (false valuation/idolatry) it is easy to fall from Grace. In God’s Grace, everything Real is priceless. Free. Charitable. No one part of God (Nature) is to be considered as more valuable than the next. This is the only spiritual worship of God, where valuelessness is equal to Being priceless (True equality). To be priceless is, in other words, to be in the Highest state of Being, unsellable, Free and self-governing. Thus we say that God-given rights are unalienable, meaning that they cannot be sold. To be unalienable means no legal lien or contract or debt can be put upon any man. A man (son) of God is not for sale. Evil always has a price, and the devil always requires a contract. God-given “natural rights” have no value in man’s fictional world other than to utterly annihilate and defeat it in their unalienability. This is said to be the shield of God, but only when every aspect of God’s Law is followed without error. It is quite simply the difference between moral values (God) and monetary valuation (mammon). This difference in perspective represents all the problems we face, and is the foundation of slavery. Only one of these is able to be acted upon by men, while the other is salable, empty, and without True value. One is of God, one of mammon. We must choose our master with every action we take. WORSHIP – _noun –_  1. Excellence of character; dignity; worth; worthiness. –Elfin BORN OF NOBLE STATE, and muckle _worship_ in his native land. In this sense, the word is nearly or quite obsolete; but hence,  2. A TITLE OF HONOR, USED IN ADDRESSES TO CERTAIN MAGISTRATES AND OTHER OF RESPECTABLE CHARACTER. My father desires your worships company. 3. A term of IRONICAL RESPECT. 4. CHIEFLY AND EMINENTLY, THE ACT OF PAYING DIVINE HONORS TO THE SUPREME BEING; or the reverence and homage paid to him in religious exercises, consisting in adoration, confession, prayer, thanksgiving and the like. The _worship_ of God is an eminent part of religion. Prayer is a chief part of religious _worship. _5. THE HOMAGE PAID TO IDOLS OR FALSE GODS BY PAGANS; as the _worship_ of Isis. 6. HONOR; RESPECT; CIVIL DEFERENCE. Then shalt thou have _worship_ in the presence of them that sit at meat with

thee. Luke 14:10

. 7. IDOLATRY

OF LOVERS; OBSEQUIOUS OR SUBMISSIVE RESPECT… WORSHIP – _verb transitive_ – 1. TO ADORE; TO PAY DIVINE HONORS TO; TO REVERENCE WITH SUPREME RESPECT AND VENERATION. Thou shalt _worship_ no other God. Exodus 34:14

. 2. To

respect; to honor; to treat with civil reverence. NOR WORSHIPD WITH A WAXEN EPITAPH. 3. TO HONOR WITH EXTRAVAGANT LOVE AND EXTREME SUBMISSION; as a lover. With bended knees I daily _worship_ her. – _verb intransitive – _1. TO PERFORM ACTS OF ADORATION. 2. TO PERFORM RELIGIOUS SERVICE. Our fathers worshiped in this mountain. John 4:20

._

(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary Of The English Language)_

—=—

_We should walk in them_… We are not the workmanship (Creation) of Christ, we are the Creation of God (Jehovah). Through Christ (the personified example of the Law/Word of God) we may honor Jehovah. In other words, there should be no notion of good or bad works in our hearts and minds. We are not to make comparisons or keep tally as in fairy tales, but to continuously and effortlessly walk in Christ-like (Light) works, under the Law of God’s Nature. Our faith is only shown by our works, not our words, but shine never as a reflection of ourselves, only as a doer of the works of Christ in honor of Jehovah. This is a lifestyle without end or holiday, an unbroken vow (promise) to God to be Christ-like in all our actions, all the time. Not on Sundays. Not on special days celebrated by church and state. Every day, all the time, without exception, till death due us part. At this level of following Christ, we are not making choices anymore, but have already made the choice to become the sons of God. Christ is the True representation and comprehension of what Logos is — the personified Word/Law/Son (Reason) of God. But when men worship Reason alone, without the source of Reason, it turns into the emptiness of self-fulfilling logic and this becomes empty idolatry. To worship Jehovah (Nature) requires us to follow this Logos but not as a god, but instead as the way (Spiritual path) and the Light. Reason is not merely a vulgar term leading to logic, but a word carrying the meaning of purpose. Our purpose must be to worship God by following the example of Christ in the Bible. Logic carries only the purpose of the man bearing it and is always limited by the ignorance of that man, and should never be confused with Natural Reasoning under the Law of Nature’s God. For today’s confused corporate Christian, this logical fallacy causes Christian gobbledygook and doublespeak because almost everything we all do defies God’s Law (Word/Son), like this:

—=—

Unedited title: _THE SHIT CHRISTIANS SAY_: This is worship of an “unknown God” (_Acts 17_). This is confident

confusion.

None of this nonsensical drivel is of the Bible, and certainly isn’t

Christ-like.

This represents nothing more than complete ignorance of the intent of

the Bible.

Yes, this is parody, but not at all removed from the modern, empty, corporate Christianity that turned me personally away from religion, and thus consequently

from the Bible.

This is the comical yet evident result of worshiping logic and religious nonsense as logos.

—=—

Over and over characters in the Bible are blessed by God through “faith” (trust) in (following) Jesus Christ (God’s Law personified), yet they are seldom actually blessed by Christ Hisself. Ever notice this? And why is this True? Simple. The Law doesn’t bless, because everything that is already in self-Existence is already, obviously, a blessed Creation of Its Creator. Wouldn’t be here otherwise, would we? When reading the Bible, we are specifically instructed to consider the character of Jesus Christ, as specifically written, as being just as susceptible to the desires of the flesh as any man, or_ in the flesh_. Christ is representative of the imperfect man behaving as perfectly as possible under God’s Law, a story we can all follow by example even despite our own desires and temptations of the flesh. This is _Logos_ in Its True intent within the Bible. But what religion do you know of (or preacher of them, for that matter) that actually follows the Bible as Law? LOL! Now to be clear, there are purposeful mis-transliterations in the Kings version that must be looked upon so as not to confuse the English word “bless” with the the notion of “being blessed.” Saying (eulogizing) “bless you” to someone after a sneeze does not carry the same weight, meaning, or intent as being “Blessed by God.” This is the inherent problem with English (dog-Latin). The word _bless_ in the Bible is translated from several different words, and those uses depend on the character assigned to the use. For instance, when the word is capitalized, it is always referential to the word in Strong’s h1288 – בָּרַךְ _barak, as in _Zechariah 11:5 the term “Blessed be the LORD,” translated from Strong’s#h3068 – יְהֹוָה – _Yĕhovah_). But this is not the same translation in other instances, where the word _bless_ was transliterated for another ancient word that carries a different meaning. This causes much confusion in the reader that does not intentionally look these words and their meaning and intent up, which is a long and arduous process. Yet it is a great learning experience, for you may with sometimes painful relief discover your own shortcomings and lack of understanding of the ancient languages, as well as how the King purposefully used different concepts as the same translated word. Only deep research and discovery can uncover these things, these purposeful mysteries and obfuscations, which is why we are instructed to study the Bible every day. In fact, for this purpose, and to show that you cannot merely read through the Bible and expect to understand what each word means, here are the various words that the King transliterated into the single, generic word, bless (blessed):

H833

אָשַׁר

‘ashar

blessed, lead, go, guide, happy, leaders, relieve

H835

אֶשֶׁר

‘esher

blessed, happy

H1288

בָּרַךְ

barak

bless, salute, curse, blaspheme, blessing, praised, kneel down, congratulate, kneel, make to kneel, misc

H1289

בְּרַךְ

bĕrak (Aramaic)

bless, kneel

H1293

בְּרָכָה

Bĕrakah

blessing, blessed, present, liberal, pools

STRONGS #

GREEK

TRANSLITERATED

ENGLISH EQUIVALENT

New Testament (Greek) for “bless”

G1757

ἐνευλογέω

eneulogeō

bless

G2127

εὐλογέω

eulogeō

bless, praise

G2128

εὐλογητός

eulogētos

blessed (said of God)

G2129

εὐλογία

eulogia

blessing, bounty, bountifully, fair speech

G3106

μακαρίζω

makarizō

call blessed, count happy

G3107

μακάριος

makarios

blessed, happy, happier

G3108

μακαρισμός

makarismos

blessedness

G6050

κατευλογέω

kateulogeō

bless

To be happy (‘_esher_) is for instance a much different meaning than being praised, saluted, or cursed (_barak_), yet these are all translated into the English word _bless_ or _blessed_. In the old texts it would be these words used separately and thus without transliteration into false sameness, and there would be no question as to which meaning was intended, nor would we need to research and find out. Silly king, tricks aren’t just for kids after all! Believe me when I say that this is how the entire Bible is transliterated, and so one must look up just about every word, even the many words translated into the singular English term “God,” to be able to properly read the Bible. Yes, you must define the word _God_ every time you come across it or you will not know whether it is Jehovah or a man acting as a god (king, magistrate, judge, etc.) Again, not my opinion, but obvious fact with just a cursory bit of research, and a perfect, typical example is right above in this graph. The fool will say I don’t believe you, Clint. And to that I cannot possibly respond but with a special kind of defeat and sadness, and then continue on trying to reach anyone left out there that’s not insane. It is this mixing of specific meanings and the intents of words that keeps the kings and popes and presidents in power, for they are the very false gods and antichrists we are warned about. It is they that tricked us into citizenship through personhood (status/valuation), which we will discuss shortly. This confusion in language has become part of what the leaders (gods) and kingdoms of nations call one of their mysteries (lies), as part of their roll of secrets, for man has no power over any slave if the slave speaks and comprehends the meaning and intent of the same language as his master. When, for instance, it is said in Daniel that he (Jesus Christ) blessed someone by laying his hands upon them, this is specifically the word _eulogeō_, from which we get the English word eulogy, which very interestingly is a specific combination of two words, those being Strong’s #G2095 – _eu_, meaning “good, well or to prosper,” and the word _word_ (Strong’s G3056) – _logos_, the subject of this current work. In translation, the term bless here means to give the good (eu) Word of God (Logos). And what else would one expect from the personification of Logos but this? Obviously a passive reading of this verse would be at best confusing without further research into these variant translations. Note that in this usage, that is, when Christ “blesses” a man, the word _logos_ is not capitalized. This signifies a generic (uncapitalized) use of the term as _logos_, the very same term mistaken by logicians for what John intended, as we can read below, to be as the Divine (capitalized) notion of Logos in Jesus Christ. But here, as a blessing from God through the Christos, the term refers only to the vulgar (common) usage, as Christ (a fabled man) spreading the Word of God (Logos) in a common language of the general words of men (logos). For what is a word but a logo of something else, some idea, or something real? A logo is a graphic representation or symbol for something else. We see the word (symbols) Pepsi or its image (logo) and know instantly what it means — carbonated corn syrup. Jesus Christ is the logo for Law, though in its divine sense, we capitalize the word as _Logos_. But it is this vulgarity or common word _logos_ as referring to mere speech and the logic behind it that most are worshiping in the stead of Jesus Christ, the True Divinity of the Word (Son/Law). For clarity, imagine in some future dystopian setting loving the Pepsi logo without knowing what that symbol references nor having ever tasted a Pepsi drink, or viewing a stop sign without knowing its meaning because there are no more working cars and the roads are thus overgrown by Nature’s unending purpose and Course. This is the empty logo that Christ has become for most Christians, who have lost connection not with the logo, the symbol, but with the Source and reason behind it. The symbol that is the cross, for instance, bears no referential at all to the actual story of Christ. There were no crosses, and the word _cross_ is translated from _stouros_, meaning “an upright “stake”, esp. a pointed one, used as such in fences or palisades.” When Jesus Christ says pick up your cross and follow me he does not reference the useless action of picking up a symbol, for that would be a useless gesture without moral teaching. Here, as with most of the story, the metaphoric term is meant, the word cross a purposefully confusing transliteration and meaning a “stake” one holds over and in the land (legal fiction), as one calls himself a stake-holder in municipal lands or other bodies politic (States) and private corporations. Remember, there is no terra (Earth) in fiction, just as there is no actual dirt in _The Matrix_ simulation, and that “land” is a legal term with no actual substance behind it. Again, to stake out the Real land (_terra_) of Jehovah, men pretend in their persons (legal status) to bear flattering title upon that land in ownership. A title is just a piece of paper. Again, it has no substance. Yet it is the flattery of ownership title to land that wars are fought over, not the land itself. The right to call Jehovah by any name and flattering title except Jehovah is the mission of the church and state and their vast military operations. Most of America, for instance, was not legally titled as anything until it was legally titled and registered as the legal fiction called “America.” The simulation no longer bears any True resemblance to what it is supposed to simulate. And so the symbol becomes the false truth, the false logos, and any Truth behind the symbol is lost to the bearer. It becomes a simulacrum, a copy without an original. The lie that is the emptiness of the symbol becomes the new, artificial truth. That false truth is worshiped, that is, forced not only to be perceived as truth, but the new source of all systems built around what is falsely worshiped as truth (source). This is modern religion, and today’s corporate religions are the result of the false truth of a man-made (purely logical, impossible form of) logos. This ever-changing, always false _logos_, in turn, is the source of both the modern “Christian” and the atheist, the flattering titled scientist and the misguided fool spouting sophomoric philosophy and theosophy. All this exists today because of the purposeful deceit and mis-transliteration of those in power over the marriage and total dependence upon the false, legalized church (religion) and state

(legal gods).

Part of the Strong’s definition of _logos_ in this particular separation of common and Divine usages is this: “λόγος lógos, log’-os; from G3004

;

SOMETHING SAID (INCLUDING THE THOUGHT); by implication, A TOPIC (subject of discourse), also REASONING (the mental faculty) OR MOTIVE; by extension, A COMPUTATION; SPECIALLY, (WITH THE ARTICLE IN JOHN) THE DIVINE EXPRESSION (I.E. CHRIST):—account, cause, COMMUNICATION, × concerning, doctrine, fame, × have to do, intent, matter, mouth, preaching, question, reason, + reckon, remove, say(-ing), shew, × speaker, speech, talk, thing, + none of these things move me, tidings, treatise, utterance, word, work.”

—=—

I would suggest that the reader examine the whole Strong’s entry for this word _logos_ to understand these two very different meanings in transliteration, especially that of Jesus Christ (Logos, The Law of God) being an expression (logos) of God, and not a God Itself, which

can be found

here: https://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?strongs=G3056&t=KJV. While most usage of the word _bless_ is Old Testament (pre-Christ), the few times Jesus Christ uses the word _bless_ he is instructing men to bless each other.

—=—

“BUT I SAY UNTO YOU, LOVE YOUR ENEMIES, BLESS THEM THAT CURSE YOU, DO GOOD TO THEM THAT HATE YOU, AND PRAY FOR THEM WHICH DESPITEFULLY USE YOU, AND PERSECUTE YOU…”_–Matthew 5:44, KJB_

—=—

“BLESS THEM THAT CURSE YOU, AND PRAY FOR THEM WHICH DESPITEFULLY

USE YOU.”

_–Luke 6:28, KJB_

—=—

And what does it mean to “bless” your enemy? Nothing more than to eulogize to him, to speak and act in and under the Word of God, the Truth. It means be Christ-like. In other words, when Christ blesses anything in eulogy this means he says a prayer over it to his Father (God), because Christ is not God. He also blesses bread, for instance. But religions have warped the sense of this word _bless_ as if it were some magic spell to be cast, where a priest pretends to bless us by placing his spiritually dead, corporate (employed) hands upon us. This phony ceremony has nothing to do with the works (the actions) of blessing others, nor with the blessing that Jesus Christ is to us from God. Priests have no Godly power, and they are not Jesus Christ, as much as in their delusions they wish you to believe they are. Christ only manifests in the actions of men. Christ will only return (as a metaphor) when men start acting Christ-like toward one another, when Logos is fulfilled. As long as Christ is idolized, externalized, so too will the idea of peace and prosperity in harmony with Nature (God). The part (man) must reunite itself under the Law with the whole (Jehovah) instead of trying to live without (outside) of It and pretending our own law. This is a self-Evident Truth. This is the Word of God. Here are some other examples of Christ’s usage of the word blessed, which point to the fact that mans actions are what causes his own and others blessings, not the mere idolization of Christ on a pedestal or in some trinket worn around the neck:

—=—

“Blessed _are_ the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of

heaven.

Blessed _are_ they that mourn: for they shall be comforted. Blessed _are_ the meek: for they shall inherit the earth. Blessed _are_ they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled. Blessed _are_ the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy. Blessed _are_ the pure in heart: for they shall see God. Blessed _are_ the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children

of God.

Blessed _are_ they which are persecuted for righteousness’ sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Blessed are ye, when _men_ shall revile you, and persecute _you_, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake… And blessed is _he_, whosoever shall not be offended in me… But blessed _are_ your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they

hear…“

_–Matthew 5:3-11, 11:6, 13:16, KJB_

—=—

Bottom line: you are not blessed because you go to church and pretend to be a “Christian” in flattering title alone. Those being referred to here are blessed because they are acting in these descriptions, not because they read about them or listen to a pretender christ preach to them every Sunday about them. Blessed is he that follows each of these Laws of God, who manifest Christ (Logos) in their actions. You see, JEHOVAH DOESN’T CHOOSE WHETHER YOU ARE BLESSED OR NOT, YOU DO. You must act the part in Loving sincerity and a totally Charitable lifestyle. You must be the meek and you must seek after righteousness. No idol of a God will do it for you. No cross you bear proves any of these blessings can be claimed as your own. For the blessings of God do not emirate from the hands or talisman built by the hands of men, and certainly not from the hands or logic of some minister or priest. You are a part of Jehovah, and you must act like such under the Law of Jehovah. Calling yourself “Christian” means nothing, and certainly doesn’t create some bond or blessing with God or Christ, no personal relationship that you may define your own personal God (Lawgiver) and Savior (Law). This is ridiculous and without Biblical merit. You are blessed by your works, your actions, your words, and even by the fact that you are persecuted for acting in Truth, in Charity, in Love, in Eulogy of and by Logos (Law). You are a son of God only if you are a peacemaker, not a passivist or a war-maker, and not a conscientious objector. In a spiritual war, no man may sit on the sidelines, for that is where the darkness lurks. You are blessed when and only when you choose your God, and thus your Law, and you abide by It, no matter the cost. And there are only Two choices in the end: Truth or lies. Nature or fiction. Reality or artifice. This is the story of the _Life_ and therefore choices of Jesus Christ, and likewise, will be the story of every man’s choice to be blessed or to be cursed by Jehovah. Sadly, it seems, most men will follow whatever false legal god (magistrate) that currently claims to be the antichrist of the day, or the one that everyone else blindly voted to be so. And so the Logos, the Law (Word/Son) of God is put aside so that the legal doctrine may be followed. We therefore become sons (per-sons) of the fictional state (corporation/artificial person) and its legal (artificial) law. And so our spirits and the ability to religiously follow God’s Law are crushed beneath that false doctrine. The written law overtakes the unwritten like a fisherman’s net, the immoral/amoral stands highest over the moral. Everything is backwards, even from the very maxims (principles) of law that these nations were founded by. But then that is the very definition of satanism, straight from the mouth of Albert Pike:

—=—

“THE TRUE NAME OF SATAN, THE CABALISTS SAY, IS THAT OF YAHVEH REVERSED; FOR SATAN IS NOT A BLACK GOD, BUT THE NEGATION OF GOD. THE DEVIL IS THE PEROSNIFICATION OF ATHEISM OR IDOLATRY. FOR THE INITIATES, THIS IS NOT A _PERSON_, BUT A _FORCE_, CREATED FOR GOOD, BUT WHICH MAY SERVE FOR EVIL. _IT IS THE INSTRUMENT OF __LIBERTY FOR

FREE WILL_.”

_—Albert Pike, ‘Morals and Dogma,’ Page 102_

—=—

The absence of God is the presence of Satan (that which is adversarial to God). Just like the absence of health is the presence of disease and the absence of light is the presence of darkness. In other words, the negation of God’s Law (Logos) in the legal nations under the legal (fictional) system is caused by the enactment of legalism, of logic-based planning and false law, and therefore of the very false doctrines warned about in the Bible. We are currently living in the True meaning of this term Satanism, in that which in every way is opposed to God’s Law. In other words, what is missing from our societies is a respect of God, and thus we find an empty void in place of the Law of Nature. This cannot be denied, and is the purpose of my book series. I cannot stress enough that leading the way in this adversarial construct of legalism (law of the land) is the self-proclaimed “Christian” corporations and their followers — not the actual (nameless) followers of Jesus Christ (Logos), but of the false doctrines of church and state, by the citizens (subjects/goyim) of nations that go to church and pretend their sins are washed away through the flattering titles they accept, though the Bible clearly declares that no flattering titles should be respected, no persons. Today’s society and church bodies is the exact reason why such titles as “Christian” should never be respected. That would be like Kim Jong-un showing up to meet president Trump with a T-shirt that says _don’t worry, be happy: I’m a Buddhist and therefore a peacemaker._ The title means nothing, especially to those that the bearer has never met or to whom one’s reputation precedes the flattering title. The actions of the man determine the quality and legitimacy of his character, and thus any name he uses, not the name itself. This is the self-evident Law of Nature. This is not a judgment, not an insult, not a curse, just the absolute Truth as is again warned about in the Bible. _There will be many antichrists _(1

John 2:18)…

What do I mean when i say that the respect of persons and flattering titles are against the Word (Law/Son) of God? It’s not my opinion. It’s the foundation of Biblical teaching. In short, no fiction allowed. That is, no fictions should be attached to you in a way that the law of that fiction may control your actions, and turn them against Jehovah. This, obviously, is the Law of Nature. If Nature could speak for Itself, It would certainly, self-evidently agree. A citizen of the United States is a person, which is a fictional character, a legal status under legal law, and upon that status we pretend to place flattering titles like employee, president, attorney, Christian, etc. The paradox here is self-evident to the reader of the Bible. But in short, this simply means that these names and titles that are attached to a fictional character (legal person/citizen/subject) mean nothing except what the law of persons, of citizens, of subjects says they can be. The name and title, in other words, becomes a proprietary term, the property of the state. They are not bound in any way by the Law of God. And so to say that one acting in the agency and capacity of a legal person in mammon is also a “Christian” by title is to speak adversarially, to lie to both oneself and to all others in respect of that title. For one cannot be both under the false doctrinal law of the legal (satanic) state in fiction (un-Truth) and also under the Law of Nature (Reality) while following Christ. As I revealed in my first book, it is literally illegal to act upon the Bible, the Word of God (Logos), while under the legal system in legal persona. I cannot stress this

enough.

The trickery of words used by the legal state says that we may have freedom of religion, not religious freedom. There is a huge difference. It means that while you may choose any religion you wish, you may not act upon its law, and that includes the Bible. You may believe what you wish, but you must follow the legal law. This makes all religions in America null and void, for at the very root of all religion is the Law of God. To be able to worship God without being allowed to morally object to the legal law is oxymoronic at best. It means you cannot follow Christ because it would be against the legal law. And this means that any man calling himself a “Christian” while also being a national citizen is bearing a false, flattering title that he cannot fulfill. No Christian can act Christ-like while under the legal system of any nation/state. It is impossible. And this spells out the entirety of our collective problems in society, on Earth for that matter, for no man may stand up against the authority and actions of the state or nation in the name of God and under Its Law. No “citizen” may practice and Live spiritually by the Law of Nature. It’s illegal. No man (in his or her actions) may be a son of God. And so when I (and the Bible) state that you are flattering yourself by calling yourself a Christian without acting the part, I don’t mean this as a judgement or insult, I literally mean that you are bearing an impossible title. You cannot be a Christian and a worshiper of mammon (commerce/money). You cannot work in and support this fictional (legal) matrix and also worship the Truth of Nature of Reality that is the Supreme Being of Jehovah. This is again a self-evident Truth. To take offense at what is self-evidently True is a diseased state of mind, for the Truth cannot be offensive to anything but lies, to fiction, to legalism, and especially to logic. But again, let us consult the scriptural teachings on the subject for absolute, inexcusable clarity. The following verses take away all possible arguments about this subject and blows the lid off of the notion that a nation (corporation/artificial person) can be a blessing from God, or that a man acting in legal persona may also worship God by following Christ (Law). For all legal systems require man to be surety (responsible and liable) for some fictional person (legal status), and to respect those persons and flattering titles that are higher than one’s own.

—=—

“AND IF YE CALL ON THE FATHER, WHO WITHOUT RESPECT OF PERSONS JUDGETH ACCORDING TO EVERY MAN’S WORK, PASS THE TIME OF YOUR SOJOURNING HERE IN FEAR: FORASMUCH AS YE KNOW THAT YE WERE NOT REDEEMED WITH CORRUPTIBLE THINGS, AS SILVER AND GOLD, FROM YOUR VAIN CONVERSATION RECEIVED BY TRADITION FROM YOUR FATHERS…” _—1 Peter 1:17-18, KJB_

—=—

“MY BRETHREN, HAVE NOT THE FAITH OF OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST, THE LORD OF GLORY, WITH RESPECT OF PERSONS.”

_—James 2:1, KJB_

—=—

“FOR THERE IS NO RESPECT OF PERSONS WITH GOD.” _—Romans 2:11, KJB_

—=—

“LET ME NOT, I PRAY YOU, ACCEPT ANY MAN’S PERSON: NEITHER LET ME GIVE FLATTERING TITLES UNTO ANY MAN.”

_—Job 32:21, KJB_

—=—

“NOT THAT I SPEAK IN RESPECT OF WANT: FOR I HAVE LEARNED IN WHATSOEVER STATE I AM, THEREWITH TO BE CONTENT.” _—Philippians 4:11, KJB_

—=—

“BUT IF YOU HAVE RESPECT TO PERSONS, YE COMMIT SIN, and are convinced of the Law AS TRANSGRESSORS.”

_—James 2:9, KJB_

—=—

“TO HAVE RESPECT OF PERSONS, IS NOT GOOD: for a piece of bread, that man will TRANSGRESS.” _—Proverbs 28:21, KJB_

—=—

“LEST THERE BE ANY FORNICATOR, OR PROFANE PERSON, AS ESAU, WHO FOR ONE MORSEL OF MEAT SOLD HIS BIRTHRIGHT.” _—Hebrews 12:16, KJB_

—=—

“BUT THEM THAT ARE WITHOUT, (LET) GOD JUDGETH. THEREFORE PUT AWAY FROM AMONG YOUR SELVES THAT WICKED PERSON.” _—1 Corinthians 5:13, KJB_

—=—

“YE SHALL DO NO UNRIGHTEOUSNESS IN JUDGEMENT, THOU SHALL NOT RESPECT THE PERSON _(__TITLE__) _OF THE POOR, NOR HONOR THE PERSON _(__EN-TITLE-MENT__) _OF THE MIGHTY, BUT IN RIGHTEOUSNESS SHALT THOU JUDGE THY NEIGHBOR.” _—Leviticus 19:15 (words in parenthesis added by author for

clarity), KJB_

—=—

“AND YE HAVE RESPECT TO HIM THAT WEARETH GAY CLOTHING, AND SAY UNTO HIM, SIT THOU HERE IN A GOOD PLACE: AND SAY TO THE POOR, STAND THOUGH THERE, OR SIT HERE UNDER MY FOOTSTOOL…”

_—James 2:3, KJB_

—=—

“THESE THINGS ALSO BELONG TO THE WISE: IT IS NOT GOOD TO HAVE RESPECT OF PERSONS IN JUDGEMENT.” _—Proverbs 24:23, KJB_

—=—

“IT IS NOT GOOD TO ACCEPT THE PERSON OF THE WICKED, TO OVERTHROW THE RIGHTEOUS IN JUDGEMENT.” _—Proverbs 18:5, KJB_

—=—

“And ye masters, do the same things unto them, forbearing

threatening:

knowing that your master also is in heaven, NEITHER IS THERE RESPECT OF PERSONS WITH HIM.” _—Ephesians 6:9, KJB_

—=—

“MY BRETHREN, HAVE NOT THE FAITH OF OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST THE LORD OF GLORY, WITH RESPECT OF PERSONS.”

_—James 2:1, KJB_

—=—

“WHEREFORE NOW, LET THE FEAR OF THE LORD BE UPON YOU, TAKE HEED AND DO IT: FOR THERE IS NO INEQUITY WITH THE LORD OUR GOD, NOR RESPECT OF PERSONS, NOR TAKING OF GIFTS.” _—2 Chronicles 19:7, KJB_

—=—

“FOR HE SEE THAT WISE MEN DIE, LIKEWISE THE FOOL, AND THE BRUTISH PERSON PERISH, AND LEAVE THEIR WEALTH TO OTHERS.” _—Psalms 49:10, KJB_

—=—

“BUT HE THAT DOETH WRONG, SHALL RECEIVE FOR THE WRONG WHICH HE HATH DONE: AND THERE IS NO RESPECT OF PERSONS.” _—Colossians 3:25, KJB_

—=—

“THOU SHALT EAT IT WITHIN THY GATES, THE UNCLEAN AND THE CLEAN PERSON SHALL EAT IT ALIKE, AS THE ROE BUCK, AND AS THE HART.” _—Deuteronomy 15:22, KJB_

—=—

“AND HIS ESTATE SHALL STAND UP A VILE PERSON, TO WHOM THEY SHALL NOT GIVE THE HONOR OF THE KINGDOM: BUT HE SHALL COME IN PEACEABLY, AND OBTAIN THE KINGDOM BY FLATTERIES_ (FLATTERING TITLES)_.” _—Daniel 11:21, KJB (words in parenthesis added by author for

clarity)_

—=—

“MASTER, WE KNOW THAT THOU ART TRUE, AND CAREST FOR NO MAN: FOR THOU REGARDEST NOT THE PERSON OF MEN, BUT TEACHEST THE WAY OF GOD IN TRUTH. IS IT LAWFUL TO GIVE TRIBUTE TO CESAR, OR NOT?”“…AND JESUS ANSWERING SAID TO THEM, RENDER TO CESAR THE THINGS THAT ARE CESAR’S_(__GIVE BACK THE LEGAL PERSON__, __RELINQUISH FLATTERING TITLES AND PRIVILEGES__)_, AND TO GOD THE THINGS THAT ARE GOD’S. AND THEY MARVELED AT HIM.” _—Mark 12: 14 and 17, KJB_

—=—

“FOR THE VILE PERSON WILL SPEAK VILLAINY, AND HIS HEART WILL WORK INEQUITY, TO PRACTICE HYPOCRISY, AND TO UTTER ERROR AGAINST THE LORD, TO MAKE EMPTY THE SOUL OF THE HUNGRY, AND HE WILL CAUSE THE DRINK OF THE THIRSTY TO FAIL.”

_—Isaiah 32:6_

—=—

This line of not respecting persons and flattering titles is stressed IN EVERY BOOK OF THE BIBLE. It is perhaps one of the most important of spiritual Laws one may have, that is, to not pretend to be some thing (artificial name/noun) when you are no thing under God (in Nature), as when accepting and believing in (trusting) persons and the flattery of legal (fictional) titles. Only in (under) this acceptance may inequity take over any man, for while all men are Equally Created (born into Nature with unalienable, God-given rights), all legal (man-made) statuses (persons/titles) are certainly not equal, and never can be. For if titles and statuses were the same, they would have no use or practicality. They would be redundant. To the son of God that follows Jesus Christ (Law), this fact is apparent, and no title or status is ever needed, for these are not Creations of God and so not to be found anywhere in Nature. The son of God acts the part (the Real Self) at all times, and so has no need to present papers or symbols that only represent good acts but do not prove them in Reality. Only under personhood may men be enslaved and put under a false doctrine of legal law, for with every person (status) and title (flattery) comes a new set of man’s law. To be entitled is to be both bound by and empowered and tempted by the laws and licenses/permits (false/legal forgiveness of crimes against Nature) of men. There is no need of any title or persona (mask) for a son of God, a follower of Christ (Logos), because there is no need to hide ones True Self. There is no need for a mask (persona) because there is no need to commit any crime. This is the foundation of the Law of Nature, so that fiction may never necessitate harm to any part of Nature, including each other. True Charity under God is an action, and so It knows no anonymity. Giving money is not True Charity, for it involves no actual charitable acts. Love cannot be sourced out, it must be given Freely and without limitation. Good will (Lawful behavior) goes beyond the legal matrix code of written words, and can only be shown in our acts toward one another and in protection (True Worship) of Jehovah. Good will (acts) is based on and can only come from Good Testament (Law/Logos), for they are in sameness, one being the measure of the other. This is self-evident, and is built in even to the maxims of

law:

—=—

“THE FOUNDATION BEING REMOVED, THE SUPERSTRUCTURE FALLS.“ _–Sublato fundamento cadit opus._

—=—

To put this situational Truth into more simplistic terms, let us consider a common (goyim) soldier. Will it be the man or the flattering title of “soldier” that will be _judged_ by God for the murders the man commits while acting (pretending) to be something he is not, in the name (rank/status) of the legal system he bears entitlement from with legal (anti-God) license to kill? Will the man (Reality) or the person (fiction) that title of soldier is attached to be judged? Is it the man or the “soldier” that actually does the killing? Hint: there are no persons or titles in Nature (Jehovah). Thus the answer is quite self-Evident. For God can only judge Its own Creation, not what is not of God’s Realm. And just what is this concept called “judgement?” Ask any man that did such killing on the ground, and he will tell you of his post-traumatic stress and regret, though he may be so brainwashed by patriotism that his lawless actions under the Law of Nature, which were legally premised and licensed under the satanic (adversarial to Nature’s God and Law) state or nation, are still blamed on the persona and flattering title he was acting in. He will continue to justify his own actions in the name and title of the person he pretends to be, upon which the flattering title of “soldier” and “patriot” were placed along with a license to arbitrarily break the commandment of _DO NOT HARM or

KILL_.

—=—

“PATRIOTISM IS THE LAST REFUGE OF A SCOUNDREL.” _—Samuel Johnson, quoted from Boswell’s: ‘Life of Johnson’_

—=—

Or he may commit suicide (self-murder) upon his True Self because he cannot manage the cognitive dissonance that the Truth creates in his own mind. He at least has stress and regret because deep down the self-evident Truth is apparent and inescapable — there is no moral excuse under the Law of God (in Reality) for his own voluntary actions. And regardless of what flattery of military (state) title he bared (pretended to carry), his actions were always voluntary and self-evidently his own. For God is no respecter of persons, and no man may carry a title without accepting the mark of such a persona (legal, fictional status). No man (son) of God, in other words, may ever bear a false persona nor act under its law, and therefore in no way may bear any flattering title. The Law of a son of God (follower of Christ) does not recognize any legal (artificial) status in any of man’s invented (fictional) societies or nations, not even that of “the poor” or “the rich.” For to each of these men flattering themselves with fictional titles the son of God will act Christ-like TOWARDS THE MAN BUT NOT HIS TITLE, IN THIS WAY LOVING HIS ENEMY (THE MAN DESPITE HIS LIES, FICTION, ARTIFICE), feeding him (the man without name or title) if he’s hungry, clothing him if he is naked, and supporting him with Love, and blessing (eulogizing to) him in his fall from Grace so that he may find his path to and in Christ (Logos). This is the fulfillment of Logos (Law), the return of Christ manifested in the permanent, Lawful actions of men. We never Love the person or title of the man, only the man, for the man is of (belongs to, is a part of) Jehovah while his titles are always false and are therefore ALWAYS our enemy (of logic/legalism). We contract in persons, and contracts are ALWAYS under the law of man, not God. But no man is an enemy (Law-breaker) of God without such false, logic-based, legal statuses. What is a part of Jehovah cannot therefore be Its enemy, no more than a leaf is an enemy of its tree. But if that leaf gets infected, then the leaf becomes the enemy through the disease. The disease is metaphorically akin to that which is antichrist, while the healthy leaf is Christ-like in its work towards the benefit and health of the whole tree, and all trees exist of course being part of Jehovah and thus in self-Existence to nurture the Whole. Ultimately, this is the perfection of spiritually-based Self-interest, without greed or desires for artificial things. The tree nor any other part of Jehovah cannot survive or thrive unless the sum of all every self-existent part is in harmony, acting not merely as the self but as and in harmony with the Whole. Legal names (persons) and flattering titles are a disease toward Nature (Reality), as all artifice and lies are. This is not opinion, again, but self-evident Truth. What is artificial is not a Creation of God. The enemy of Jehovah is only the legal fictions and inventions of men that oppose Logos, oppose the Harmony of Nature (Jehovah) and Its Law. Ultimately, there is one verse in the Bible that says it all, answering any question or proposed exception to this idea of persona (mask) and flattering titles. In its singular eloquence stands a perfection of the spoken Word (Logos). Following it we find the same unabashed Truth applied to man’s legal “world” and its matrix of

systems (nations):

—=—

“IF ANYONE THINKS THEY ARE SOMETHING WHEN THEY ARE NOT, THEY DECEIVE THEMSELVES.” _–Galatians 6:3, KJB_

—=—

“ALL NATIONS BEFORE HIM _ARE_ AS NOTHING; AND THEY ARE COUNTED TO HIM LESS THAN NOTHING, AND VANITY.” _–Isaiah 40:17, KJB_

—=—

Nations are built (constituted) in nothingness (words on paper). Their representative appearance (perspective) can only be one of pure vanity, of anti-Logos. Persons are as well this same form without substance. No man can ever be a person in Nature, in Reality, for this is impossible. And it is a maxim of law that no man may be forced to do what is impossible. This is very important, for it only applies to the limitations of men, not fiction, not persons. What is impossible under the Law of Nature is made (pretended to be) possible under the law of man. We must grow spiritually to know that the Highest Law must always trump the possibilities of lawless men, of they whose structures are always without Foundation in Jehovah. A man may only be deceived and thus allow himself to exist in self-deceit by playing the part of a legal status, a person, a title that exists (fictionally, falsely) in the artifice of some non-Existent nation. In other words, nations and persons are not self-Existent, but are inventions of men. They are not therefore bound by the Law of Jehovah (Nature), and neither therefore are the men who pretend to legally act in them. They do not Exist and are not Creations of God. Their roots are legal (anti-God) and thus without any True Foundation. To say I am a United States citizen-ship is saying _I am the nation_. _I am American_. _I

am not of God._

For “The Walking Dead” comic or television show fans, to declare oneself to be _I am American_ is the same as saying _I am Negan_.

—=—

To be _I AM anything_ is to relinquish Free Will, to abandon the Grace and Blessing of God, to pretend to be what one is not, and so to follow a false _god_ by following its law (legal words). Negan is representative of a false logos not at all unlike any other leader of any nation, though perhaps just a bit more brutally honest and forthcoming about

what he represents.

I am Negan means I am not an act of God.

—=—

Yet the Highest Law is that of the _I AM_, that _I AM _is the only answer, which means_ I AM JEHOVAH_, which really means _I AM no other person, place, or thing_. What is the intent? That _I AM_ not able to be entrapped by the inventions and laws of man, that I am the manifestation of Jesus Christ and nothing but a Creation of God. _I AM_ no title, no name, no nation, no country, and no subject. I AM THAT I AM. I am part of the free and eternal Nature of self-Existence (God). If you can understand this, as a complete lack of status or any other man-made conception (a result of illicit logic), then you may understand the fullness of the Law of God, the Law of Nature (Source). It is perhaps most simple to say that every word in the (red letter) Bible that comes from Christ is considered to be representative of the Logos (Divine Law of Jehovah/Nature). Thus the word _bless_, when used as that of a common word coming from Jesus Christ, is a compound of the words _logos_ and _eu _— the _good news_ or _good Word_ (Law) of God. When in reference to the character of Jesus Christ, then the term Logos carries the Higher (Divine) meaning and purpose, and is thus capitalized as that which is coming from or is a gift of God. Though it is very difficult to direct the usages of such language arts from their Greek and Latin due to the purposeful obfuscations of the King’s English translations, I hope that I have explained it enough here by example that the reader may now see the difference between what is the True Logos (Son) of God and the logic (false logos) recreated by the extremely limited contemplations (words/logic) of men. In the old languages this differentiation would be clear. Christ, being characterized as_ in the flesh_, thus spoke to men in the vulgar form of logos (words based on self-evident Natural Reason, not mere logical conclusion) that represented Logos (the Law of the Universe/God). Christ, being the personification of the Word (Law) of God’s Nature, is therefore not_ in the flesh_, of course, but is referential to the Divine Nature (Law and Purpose) of God, and is thus _Logos_ capitalized to mean the Highest example (as a personification). The point is that man’s worship of the limitations of his own logic, including all of so-called, contextual human “history,” as a replacement for the self-Existent and self-evident Law of Nature (the Son of God) is a perfect description of both modern “Christianity,” the corporate-syndicalist sciences (arts), and philosophy, both modern and ancient. The logician worships Plato and Socrates, not the Divine Author (Truth) of the Universe and the Bible.

—=—

“LET ME CONTROL THE TEXTBOOKS, AND I WILL CONTROL THE STATE.”

_–Adolf Hitler_

—=—

“THE GREATEST BULWARK AGAINST AN OVERREACHING GOVERNMENT, AS TYRANTS KNOW, IS A RELIGIOUS POPULATION. THAT IS BECAUSE RELIGIOUS PEOPLE FORM COMMUNITIES OF INTEREST ADVERSE TO GOVERNMENT CONTROL OF THEIR LIVES; RELIGIOUS COMMUNITIES RELY ON THEIR FAMILIES AND EACH OTHER RATHER THAN AN OVERARCHING GOVERNMENT UTILIZING FORCE.”

_–Ben Shapiro_

—=—

If this is all too religious sounding to you, that is no doubt because you don’t understand what religious freedom is. Why? Because the Truth is that you’ve never actually had it! Remember that religious communities were the original, individual eastern settlers of America, as self-governing congregational churches (people), and that the establishment of a central (federal) government was a tyranny against such True, independent organizations of religious freedom. This, again, was not an attack on merely the vulgar, empty belief in some contextual history of God or gods, but specifically upon acting morally according to that belief – the taking away of the right to practice religious belief and Law. This is a huge difference, one which we are all fooled into calling as the legal franchise of “freedom of religion” in international circles, which amounts to nothing but belief without action (acts); where, for example, the act of charity is illegal without state license. There is no law for any national citizen (goyim) but that of the textbooks of the state (district), for no law is or can be higher to a creation (invention/device) of man, as a legal fictional persona (legal status) than that of the law that binds and controls legal fiction. The Law of Nature, the Law of God simply does not apply to fictions, and, indeed, cannot and never will. It is literally, mentally, physically, and spiritually impossible for a legal person (citizen) to follow the Law

of God (Nature).

But also remember that most of the Bible is metaphor and parables written by men to teach moral stories of the Law (Son/Word), and that their Divinity is not supernatural but merely an expression (words) of self-Evident Truth, which is said to be only of the Source (Jehovah) and never of men. No man was possessed by God to write the Bible, but rather it was written by men that understood they were possessions (properties) of Jehovah. The words of men are only Divine (God-like) when those words express absolute, self-evident, self-Existent Truth without ego, but the words of men are never Divine in and of themselves. In other words, the words of men are not part of the self-Existent Supremacy of Being (God). The words of men are never the Source of Truth, only expressive or opposed to Truth. Thus the Bible is a Divinely inspired work, which means inspired by the Truth, and God is Truth. Let not these words trick you into lies and self-delusions. Again, the litmus test for any man’s words is to compare those words to the Word of God (Logos), to the Truth of that which is self-Existent. Logic is never the path to Truth, for Truth never needs the contemplation or words of men to Exist. Man may only ever speak of a Truth that already Exists in and of itself, being self-existent, the very definition of Jehovah. The mysteries of these words spin an intricately beautiful and spiritual web when the false mysteries (fictions) of men are discarded. The Truth about the Bible as printed in the dumbed-down, spiritually dead, numbingly literal English language (dog-Latin) is that every individual man that reads it will take from it exactly what he wants to take, which depends solely on his intention. He may justify wars with the Bible in “God’s” name, never realizing he has the wrong translation of the word God, which means magistrate, king, or anyone held in respect of to much authority. And yet when this man learns such truths, he will deny them because his intent was always only to justify war. Likewise, the atheist will mistranslate the Bible all day to prove his position and flattering title, never realizing that what he stands for (atheism, nihilism) is impossible, never understanding that Jehovah is defined as all Existence, and so the belief in the non-existence of God (Jehovah) is actually the paradoxical logic that Existence does not Exist. All this because the word Jehovah as “God” was never given to any corporate goyim “Christian” nor taught in any public school, because the gods (magistrates) forbid it. Atheism is a non sequitur, a non-starter, because it is based on religion, not the Word and intent of the Bible. Yet the atheist may indeed also worship his own imaginary (logic-based) form (without substance) of his own false _logos_ — that is, his own version of what he thinks the Universe (all of self-Existence) Is in Its Being. Only a fool, which indeed I certainly was one for most of my life, actually believes that there is a choice to believe or not believe in what the Bible defines as Jehovah (Existence). What is self-Evident needs not mans vulgar, logical belief system to be part of Existence (Jehovah). In this way, we may read the Bible without the supernatural element and mystery that religions have placed upon “God.” Once this hump of nonsensical anthropomorphism is overcome, the rush of available knowledge in the Bible and in other works of men is endless. Remember, it was the elitist Horace Greeley that stated both of these separate but interlocking quotes, which support each other in almost

indefatigable ways:

—=—

“IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO ENSLAVE, MENTALLY OR SOCIALLY, A BIBLE-READING PEOPLE. THE PRINCIPLES OF THE BIBLE ARE THE GROUNDWORK OF HUMAN

FREEDOM.”

_—Horace Greeley, founding editor of ‘The New-Yorker’ and ‘New York Tribune’ newspapers_

—=—

“WE HAVE STRICKEN THE (SLAVE) SHACKLES FROM FOUR MILLION HUMAN BEINGS AND BROUGHT ALL LABORERS TO A COMMON LEVEL NOT SO MUCH BY THE ELEVATION OF FORMER SLAVES AS BY PRACTICALLY REDUCING THE WHOLE WORKING POPULATION, WHITE AND BLACK, TO A CONDITION OF SERFDOM. WHILE BOASTING OF OUR NOBLE DEEDS, WE ARE CAREFUL TO CONCEAL THE UGLY FACT THAT BY AN INIQUITOUS MONEY SYSTEM WE HAVE NATIONALIZED A SYSTEM OF OPPRESSION WHICH, THOUGH MORE REFINED, IS NOT LESS CRUEL THAN THE OLD SYSTEM OF CHATTEL SLAVERY.” _–Horace Greeley (1811-1872), __founding editor of the ‘New York Tribune,’ speaking on post-civil war or ‘14th amendment’

citizenship_

—=—

Please stop and consider these two quotes together, and then contemplate your own state of 14th amendment (commercial) citizenship to the nation (district), where the Bible is all but banned from the education system. Amazing… Think of your addiction to money, to usury, to debt, and to grocery, as that which is strictly prohibited by the Law of Nature. Ask yourself what is social and political equality but slavery by a different name? Now ask yourself how do we as a people free ourselves from this modernized “chattel slavery.” Obviously the answer is not religion. The answer is both to read your Bible and then act upon its principles of Law. The principles (maxims) of Law and thus freedom are to be found there, as well as all the warnings to not do exactly what we all do every day in this legal (anti-God) system, “Christian” or not. In a word, True Freedom is just another way of saying self-Government under the Law of Nature (Jehovah). The juxtaposition of these two quotes are essential to understanding the difference between the false and the True Logos. For the second quote is referring to a legal system based strictly on the purely adulterated logic of men —  the worship of idolized logic over the True Nature of Reality and Its Law. Noah Webster was also quite clear, that _education is useless without the Bible_. And you wonder why the bible is now almost completely banned in our Rockefeller-initiated public schools? Do you wonder why you and your children will never be free? Isn’t it self-Evident by now? Indeed, for those that doubt this to be true, you’ll need to argue with these Congressional resolutions:

—=—

“THE UNITED STATES IN CONGRESS ASSEMBLED… RECOMMEND THIS EDITION OF THE BIBLE TO THE INHABITANTS OF THE UNITED

STATES…

A NEAT EDITION OF THE HOLY SCRIPTURES FOR THE USE OF SCHOOLS.” _–United States Congress 1782_

—=—

“THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES RECOMMENDS AND APPROVES THE HOLY BIBLE FOR USE IN ALL SCHOOLS.” _–United States Congress 1782_

—=—

Why was this so? Thomas Jefferson said it best, though he obviously should have held much less confidence in his constitutional system and more of the fear of God. He said:

—=—

“I have no fear that the result of our experiment will be that men may be trusted to govern themselves without a master.“ _–Thomas Jefferson_

—=—

All that had to be done for evil men to become the masters of those unable to govern themselves was to “democratically” take the Congressionally recommended Holy Bible (Law) out of schools, thus driving the foundation of that trust and the very principles of self-government out of men and their children’s minds. For it is True, and they knew it to be True, that a Bible reading people could never be enslaved. This was a spiritual war to rid the common man from having adequate understanding of the Word of God from the inception of this constituted and then legally incorporated nation (district). Start with the children. Make a child’s mind into a slave’s mind and he will never even comprehend the idea of self-governing himself under the Law of God, for he will not experientially know such a Law and the Natural Freedom it entails even Exists, even despite Its self-evidence. He will quote it, he will argue with it, but he will never have the source of it, and therefore will never self-actualize it. This is the typical story of the American patriot, another pointlessly flattering title. For the True Patriot would be self-governing, as planned, not a subject of a completely corrupt nation in a legal system of mammon. Again, everything is backwards, as we worship and protect that which we should despise and abolish.

—=—

“THE FEAR OF THE LORD IS THE BEGINNING OF KNOWLEDGE: BUT FOOLS DESPISE WISDOM AND INSTRUCTION.” _—Proverbs 1:7, KJB_

—=—

Kings, queens, and other self-proclaimed vicars (replacements) of God and of God’s _Christos_ (the anointed) are instead falsely blessed (christened) with empty ceremonial oils — a ceremony of Mystery Babylon consisting of but a corporate anointment (appointment) in legalist (logician) idolatry. They are their own self-appointed, false gods (artificial persons/corporations), standing as nothing more than organized criminals and imposters pretending to be representatives of God’s approving (anointing) Right Hand, if not a replacement (anti) God Itself. But in their fictional tales built upon mammon and in legalese, they only rule over the nothingness that is legal fiction. They are not merely false gods, but are the gods of everything false. They are anti-God. Antichrist. They cannot be anything else by their very nature (source), their flattery of title, their person (status), all of which is fiction and therefore against God’s Law of Nature. If you somehow don’t know or don’t believe that men from popes to kings to presidents to judges are still to this day considered as “gods” just pick up any early 20th century or older court case where the defendant “prays” to the “god” (magistrate/judge) of the court! Today the word _plea_ is used instead of pray, and administrative _judge_ instead of god. And what really is a judge but a false _god_ over that for which he judgeth? This is fully explained and sourced in my first book. In England today, this really has not changed except in the ignorance of the English people to what their queen actually stands for (and therefore against) as defender of the Crown corporation, as if anything of her vicariously flattering title has changed since its original, fictional inception. Look up the word “for” and you will find the word “against” defining it, just another form of the vast system of word trickery continuously used against us. And so we find that in most nations the common people are tricked into worshiping Logos, as a secondary Godhead, instead of that God and Father that even the name and story of Jesus Christ is unquestionably beholden to. In other words, when considering most of common, corporate “Christianity,” the lines between what is the Anointed (Christos) and the Great Anointer (Jehovah) have been blurred to the point that men may pretend to be anointed as the current Christos and therefore possess false, God-like powers, where even the pope claims the power to change, alter, and dismiss the words of the Bible (the Law of Nature Itself). Please understand, it is not the Bible that is the source of Law, for God is the Source of all things in Nature, including Its Law. The Bible is self-evident Truth, and where Truth is, Jehovah Is found. Jehovah (God) is Truth. There is no other Source of Truth but Jehovah. The Bible stands hard and steady as self-evident Truth, and therefore is the Word of God, as any self-evident Truth would be. So let’s delve into this grand delusion and get to the bottom of not only what True Christianity (following the Law/Word/Son of God) is supposed to be on a separate, individual level, but how, in this author’s opinion, only with this True understanding of the Bible message and what Logos is actually supposed to mean may the fundamentals of spirituality and thus True Love of all Life and Creation be implemented in saving our almost completely broken, fiction-based (temporary) societies… and each other. To worship the Sacred Permanence of the Universe, of Nature, is to worship and protect (be in sacred _dominion_ _over the earth _that Is part of) Jehovah. To follow the Law of Nature, as the Word (Law) of Jehovah personified through the story of Jesus Christ as each individual mans most perfect example, is to know and follow Logos in order to worship Jehovah. But there should be no worship of Logos, for Logos can only be manifested through our own actions, our works of Light. Jesus Christ _Exists_ only when men act Christ-like (lawfully under God). In other words, the example may only be fulfilled by one that uses the example. The story of Christ is pointless unless men act the part. The same cannot be said about Jehovah, of that which Is all self-Existence Itself as the Supremacy of all Being, as all that which Exists without and despite man. The difference between these two concepts, their proper consideration and relation, and especially their hierarchy is the main subject of this essay. Most importantly though, we must never confuse Jesus Christ with Jehovah. We must never confuse the Anointed with the Anointer, the Law (Logos) with the Lawmaker (Jehovah), the Created with the Creator, the Son with the Father, such as modern Christianity has been plagued and deceived into doing. Please note that in no way should this essay at all be taken by the reader as diminishing to what the character of Jesus Christ Is or represents, only to expose and correct the trickery of organized (incorporated) religions calling themselves by the false, flattering title of “Christianity” while being bound under mans legal system of false law that all men may finally overcome the lies of our adversaries and become the self-governing people (church) we are born into Nature (Jehovah) to be – Living equally and equitably under the Law of Jehovah by the example of Christ in order and for the sole purpose of Worshiping Jehovah, which we are part of and cannot live without. Remember here above all else, we are not interested in what you or I believe the word God or Jesus Christ to mean. We are only interested in what the author(s) of the Bible intended these words to mean in the order and intention of their usage so as to understand the Bible. One would hope this to be common practice for any serious reader, student, or scholar of anything, that is, to understand the words used to make up a fiction or non-fiction book. Imagine reading the history of New York City without knowing what the United States is, or about a dog named Lassie without knowing what a dog is or believing that dogs are cats? Is it not safe to say that only the authors definition is what matters in any communication, and that it is the duty of the reader or hearer to verify text and context? What use is any work if the words used are left open to translation? What use are language arts at all then, if no foundational meaning for them is clear or practiced? Ah, the answer to this question is the difference between a master and a slave. For the master never teaches his slaves how to correctly engage in the masters language, lest the slave be able to achieve equal footing with the master. My opinion and speculations are mute to this end, as are your own. To read the Bible and understand its content and lessons as intended, we must know what the words were intended to mean despite our own logic-based conclusions or false beliefs of what they could or should mean. Who in his or her right mind would read any work without knowing or searching for the intent and meaning of the words used therein? That’s insane. Yet that’s also the basis of public education. That’s entertainment. That’s religion. And that’s legalism. We are, most of us, simply not acting or thinking in our right mind. How can we? The masters (gods) don’t allow it, or else they would loose their flattering titles and we ours. We’d all be just _I AM_ (Naturally Equal under God’s Law) if none of us respected persons and the flattery of any titles. Learning the intended meaning of the word Jehovah, as the verb of Supreme Being, the Highest God, for me was on of the most clarifying and spiritual moments of my life. God is a verb! This destroys religion, for religions are the exact opposite of the Verb that is Jehovah and Jesus Christ (Logos), as the ultimate organized, controlled opposition towards the Bible and Its Law. A Christian is a noun (name), not a verb. A noun can never be a verb, only describe and define it. A noun, that is, a name or title of a fictional person, place, or thing, can never act by itself, can never act or exist as self-existent or self-evident. All names and titles (nouns) are fictions created by men placed on that which is Created by God in order to pretend authority over the substance through the empty form (name). The ultimate, self-evident Truth is that God’s Creation (everything Real/self-Existent in Nature) has no names. It is the respect of the name over the Reality that name represents that creates the fiction of hell, of the control and abuse of Nature by men. All names (nouns) are of man, not God. If you control the word, the name of anything, then you control the law of that thing by tricking others to respect the name/title of what is Real (of Jehovah) over that which is Its substance. This is how the lie, the name, the title, and the symbol becomes more hyperreal than the Source that lie simulates. So what is the Supreme Being (verb) as God? Every part of the Whole that is True, that is not man-made, that is not a name, a title, a symbol, a work of art, a technology, or any other form without substance. Obviously, there are no instances in Nature (Jehovah) where we find forms without substance. Think about that. For to know God one must know what is Real and what is false, what is Source and what is a copy or compound, what is timeless and priceless and what is of mammon (artificial registration and valuation). JEHOVAH – _noun_ – The Scripture name of the SUPREME BEING. If, as is supposed, THIS NAME IS FROM THE HEBREW SUBSTANTIVE _VERB_, THE WORD DENOTES THE PERMANENT BEING, AS THE PRIMARY SENSE OF THE SUBSTANTIVE VERB IN ALL LANGUAGES, is TO BE FIXED, TO STAND, TO REMAIN OR ABIDE. This is a name peculiarly appropriate to THE ETERNAL SPIRIT, THE UNCHANGEABLE GOD, who describes himself thus,I AM THAT I AM. Exodus 3:14. _(Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)_

—=—

YĔHOVAH (STRONG’S CONCORDANCE #H3068) – _יְהֹוָה Yᵉhôvâh, yeh-ho-vaw’_; from H1961; (the) SELF-EXISTENT OR ETERNAL; Jeho-vah, JEWISH NATIONAL NAME OF GOD:—Jehovah, THE LORD. Compare H3050, H3069. Jehovah = “THE EXISTING ONE.” A. the proper name of the ONE TRUE GOD. 1. unpronounced except with the vowel pointings of #0136. “Jehovah, proper name of THE SUPREME GOD AMONGST THE HEBREWS, (etc.) …allusion is made Exodus 3:14; “I (EVER) SHALL BE (THE SAME) THAT I AM (TO-DAY);” THE NAME BEING DERIVED FROM THE VERB _TO BE_, was considered TO SIGNIFY GOD AS _ETERNAL_ AND IMMUTABLE, WHO WILL NEVER BE OTHER THAN THE SAME. Allusion is made to the same etymology, Hosea 12:6, “JEHOVAH (I.E.) THE ETERNAL, THE IMMUTABLE IS HIS NAME.” With this may be compared the inscription of the _Saitic_ temple, _Plut. de Iside et Osiride_… …”

—=—

Note here that to colloquially describe oneself as _I am that I am_ is indeed to describe oneself AS NOTHING AT ALL, AS THAT WHICH IS SELF-EXISTENT (without name, title, or other fiction of man). To be the same as what I always was and always will be is to be without flattery of title or office or employment or contract under surety. To be the I AM is to be unmarked, unblemished, and without any legal dis-ease or flattery. Inversely, to be of satan, that is, to be adversarial (satanic) to Jehovah, is to be I Am a lie (some thing, noun/name). If we take the mystery out of the word satan and comprehend its intention, then we can see what is of Truth (God) and what is of the lie (satan). Where Truth is not to be found, satan therefore exists. What is of Jehovah is never a lie. What is of satan is never the Truth. And what is the Law of Truth has no power over the law of the lie without men acting in Truth and thus under and through Logos (Christ). When, as today, everything is a lie, then the Law of God (Truth) has no control over the legal law of fiction (lies) and thus does not control the will and acts of men. No man can self-govern himself when his whole life is devoted to keeping up the appearances of that which is adversarial to Truth, of money, of value, of reputation (persona/mask), of vanities, and of greed. Corporations, be they governments, religions, or commercial entities, can only have power (be respected) when the Law of God (Logos) is specifically not followed. Corporations are artificial persons, and let us be clear that nothing in the Bible is more warned against than the respecting of persons of any kind (form without substance). While all types of persons (legal status) are fictional, as creations of man, corporations (associations, etc.) are especially dubious because they can by default have no spiritual conscious overriding their purposeful greed. Their stated goal of false existence is to make money (in mammon) for their shareholders at any cost, which means denying and even causing to make illegal the Law of God (Nature) so that they may operate freely in their destruction of Nature. Meanwhile, being caught up in the individual legal status of personhood (corporate membership) ourselves, we are thus bound by the legal doctrine (law) of the state, which creates, protects, and makes law to benefit corporations (artificial persons). No follower of Christ, therefore, as a follower of God’s Word (Son/Law), can ever be a citizen of any nation or state while at the same time properly worshiping Jehovah (God), for the legal right to “freedom of religion” is a complete and utterly deceitful lie. It means only in its legal parlance that one can believe (in the mind) in any “religion” one wishes, BUT THAT ONE CANNOT ACT MORALLY UPON THOSE BELIEFS. Christ-like behavior is literally illegal in any legally-driven nation. In other words, the ability to do the works of Jehovah through Christ are stripped from all national (legal) persons by their contractual performance debt known as public citizenship. This is not “religious freedom” at all, which is the power to believe and act on those moral beliefs, but is instead the legal stranglehold over the expression of the Natural Rights of men to follow their moral conscious and Law. There can be no True religion in legal societies because the legal law is directly opposed to God’s Law and the ability to self-govern oneself under It. This is to say that while one may join a religion as a “legal” member, one may never act religiously in following any moral, spiritual, Higher Law. A religion (noun/name) is false, while acting religiously (verb) is to follow a Law. The difference here is essential to understanding the corruption of our society. And so corporations (artificial persons) like Monsanto (now insanely being allowed to be purchased and subsumed and further monopolized by Bayer corporation, the former German I.G. Farben chemical and pharmaceutical corporation) are allowed, forgiven, tolerated, and made immune from its crimes against Nature (Jehovah) because there are no followers of Christ in Existence to stop it, for all men calling themselves as “Christians” are in actuality bound by the legal doctrines of men (the law of the land respected by corporate religions) in fictional personas (legal masks of fictional status), WHERE ARTIFICIAL PERSONS (CORPORATIONS) ARE PEOPLE TOO, and have the legal “right” to literally alter and destroy all that is sacred in Jehovah, all that sustains Life on Earth. Remember, there are no actual “People” in the United States, and there are no persons in the private/several States. And so in the United States, there are only “natural” persons and “artificial” persons, the word natural in legalese meaning something very much different than what Nature (God) Is (_see page 813-816 in my first book for legal/satanic definition of “natural,” which actually means “idiot”_). In this way, we are all made to worship that which causes change, instead of the unchanging perfection of God and Its Design that is the Earth as part of the Unchanging Universe. Yet in all seriousness, all good Christian men that understand what Jehovah and Logos Is should be defending Nature with our very Lives at all times, especially today. This is our duty to God, and should be expressed by our continuous works in Christ’s Name, and under the protection and authority of the Highest possible Law, the Law of Nature (God/necessity), defeating at all costs these artificial persons posing as gods of the corporate (fictional) world. By all rights and reasoning, Monsanto should be burnt to the ground by tomorrow morning, its chemical labs violently turned over and crashed like the money-changers in the Temple… that is, if Christianity as the Law of God were actually being Lived in amongst the common people. Instead, we are helpless before the legal (artificial) law, which protects that which is pure evil in the eyes of God, as that which protects and rewards only fictional persons, not men or any part of

Nature (Jehovah).

And in case you haven’t noticed, we are seeing the ever widening wrath and judgement of God (Nature) upon us thanks to these legal corporations (governments/nations). For what is the wrath of God (Nature) but the result of man’s interference with the Law and thus Harmony of Nature (self-Existence)? What is any apocalypse but the reasonable effect and result of man’s turning away from the very Law of Nature that causes Life to Exist? What other creature could be so ridiculous that it abandons the very Nature (God) of its own Source of Life and happiness? One cannot reasonably blame God (Nature) for the resulting ramifications of ones own actions against God’s Nature and Law. Jehovah is, at best and at worst, a neutral Being (Existence). It’s judgements are not bound by the limited false reasoning and logic-based drivel of men. If it fissures, it bleeds lava and creates a scab abundant with thousands of years of future nutrients for the abundance of new, eternal Life. There is no actual, vulgar, anthropomorphic anger in these judgements, be they plagues, earthquakes, acid rain… except in the metaphorical sense. We tell the story of God being angry and jealous, not to be literal but because we are to take no other God before Jehovah (the unchanging Nature). The Universe is not actually _jealous_, but to consider the metaphor, the timeless story, helps us to follow the spiritual Law that’s designed to limit our own daily actions against what God Is and thus Live spiritually in subjectivity to the Law of Nature.

—=—

“IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO HAVE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM in any nation where churches are licensed to the government.” _—Congressman George Hansen, quoted from “In Caesar’s Grip,”

by Peter Kershaw_

—=—

Of course congress knows all this. The whole system those modern Philadelphians of the Bible calling themselves as congress assembled created into the District of (New) Columbia is founded on the covert theft of True religious freedom and the subversion and indeed outlawry of the Law of God’s Nature. The Word of God must be replaced by the words (strict/Roman law) of congress, the false gods of the United States corporation. These are not Statesmen when they are acting in United States district, these are EMPLOYEES of the US government, hirelings of their own legal creation. They wear two hats, de jure (legitimate/State/of the private People) and de facto (illegitimate/national/over all commoners). They are Statemen only when they act in “Congress Assembled,” which is extremely rare. All religions are corporations of the United States, and so is each congressman. A Dun & Bradstreet company search for “Dianne Feinstein” for instance, turns up the corporation called “Senator Dianne Feinstein,” 1 Post St Set 2450, San Francisco, CA – 94104, as it would any senator or congressman. Yes, this is a business only search. These are not Real people. These are titles of corporations (employees doing business as). These are immortal offices filled by moral men, as temporary gods (magistrates). Need I even compare this to the Law of Nature? To be clear, again we have the list of instances where the term “God” or “god” was used by the king’s transliterators to confuse the reader. Whenever the word “God” is used in the Bible, it is of absolute necessity to verify whether that “God” is Jehovah or a man acting as a god, such as a king or other magistrate. After a while it is obvious, for the the God of Nature has none of the evil qualities of men. Yet the way it is written, “God” is blamed instead of men playing as flatteringly titled gods for many dastardly and murderous deeds of men.

—=—

STRONGS #

HEBREW

TRANSLITERATED

ENGLISH EQUIVALENT

OLD TESTAMENT (HEBREW) FOR “GOD”

H136

אֲדֹנָי

‘Adonay

Lord, lord, God

H305

אַחֲלַי

‘achalay

O that, would God

H410

אֵל

‘el

God, god, power, mighty, goodly, great, idols, Immanuel, might,

strong

H426

אֱלָהּ

‘elahh (Aramaic)

God, god

H430

אֱלֹהִים

‘elohiym

God, god, judge, GOD, goddess, great, mighty, angels, exceeding,

God-ward, godly

H433

אֱלוֹהַּ

‘elowahh

God, god

H1100

בְּלִיַּעַל

bĕliya`al

Belial, wicked, ungodly, evil, naughty ungodly men

H1412

גֻּדְגֹּדָה

Gudgodah

Gudgodah

H2486

חָלִילָה

chaliylah

God forbid, far be it, be…far, Lord forbid, misc

H2623

חָסִיד

chaciyd

saints, holy, merciful, godly, good, godly man, Holy One, holy one,

ungodly

H3068

יְהֹוָה

Yĕhovah

LORD, GOD, JEHOVAH, variant

H3069

יְהֹוָה

Yĕhovih

GOD, LORD

H3863

לוּא

luw’

if, would God, O that, Oh, would it might be, if haply, peradventure, Oh that, pray thee, Though, would

H4136

מוֹל

muwl

against, toward, forefront, before, before it, against, forefront, from, God-ward, with

H5760

עֲוִיל

`aviyl

ungodly

H6697

צוּר

tsuwr

rock, strength, sharp, God, beauty, edge, stones, mighty One,

strong

H7563

רָשָׁע

rasha`

wicked, ungodly, wicked man, misc

STRONGS #

GREEK

TRANSLITERATED

ENGLISH EQUIVALENT

NEW TESTAMENT (GREEK) FOR “GOD”

G112

ἄθεος

atheos

without God

G516

ἀξίως

axiōs

worthy, as becometh, after a godly sort

G763

ἀσέβεια

asebeia

ungodliness, ungodly

G764

ἀσεβέω

asebeō

live ungodly, commit ungodly

G765

ἀσεβής

asebēs

ungodly, ungodly men

G932

βασιλεία

basileia

kingdom (of God), kingdom (of heaven), kingdom (general or evil), (Thy or Thine) kingdom, His kingdom, the kingdom, (My) kingdom, misc

G935

βασιλεύς

basileus

king, King (of Jews), King (God or Christ), King (of Israel)

G1096

γίνομαι

ginomai

be, come to pass, be made, be done, come, become, God forbid, arise, have, be fulfilled, be married to, be preferred, not tr, misc,

vr done

G1140

δαιμόνιον

daimonion

devil, god

G2098

εὐαγγέλιον

euaggelion

gospel, gospel of Christ, gospel of God, gospel of the Kingdom,

misc

G2124

εὐλάβεια

eulabeia

godly fear, fear

G2128

εὐλογητός

eulogētos

blessed (said of God)

G2150

εὐσέβεια

eusebeia

godliness, holiness

G2152

εὐσεβής

eusebēs

devout, godly

G2153

εὐσεβῶς

eusebōs

godly

G2299

θεά

thea

goddess

G2304

θεῖος

theios

divine, Godhead

G2305

θειότης

theiotēs

Godhead

G2312

θεοδίδακτος

theodidaktos

taught of God

G2313

θεομαχέω

theomacheō

fight against God

G2314

θεομάχος

theomachos

to fight against God

G2315

θεόπνευστος

theopneustos

given by inspiration of God

G2316

θεός

theos

God, god, godly, God-ward, misc

G2317

θεοσέβεια

theosebeia

godliness

G2318

θεοσεβής

theosebēs

worshipper of God

G2319

θεοστυγής

theostygēs

hater of God

G2320

θεότης

theotēs

Godhead

G3361

μή

mē

not, no, that not, God forbid, lest, neither, no man, but, none, not translated, misc

G3785

ὄφελον

ophelon

I would, I would to God, would to God

G4151

πνεῦμα

pneuma

Spirit, Holy Ghost, Spirit (of God), Spirit (of the Lord), (My) Spirit, Spirit (of truth), Spirit (of Christ), human (spirit), (evil) spirit, spirit (general), spirit, (Jesus’ own) spirit, (Jesus’

own) ghost

G5207

υἱός

huios

son(s), Son of Man, Son of God, child(ren), Son, his Son, Son of David, my beloved Son, thy Son, only begotten Son, his (David’s)

son, firstborn son

G5377

φιλόθεος

philotheos

lover of God

G5463

χαίρω

chairō

rejoice, be glad, joy, hail, greeting, Godspeed, all hail,

joyfully, farewell

G5537

χρηματίζω

chrēmatizō

be warned of God, call, be admonished of God, reveal, speak, be

warned from God

G5538

χρηματισμός

chrēmatismos

answer of God

—=—

Yes, all of these ancient words (and more) were translated into one word, that of “God” (“Lord”) by the kings scribes. This usage of these words like _god_ in place of other terms is not an uncommon practice for most of us. We may say that an Olympic medalist swam or sported like a god, for instance, or that a male or female body-builder or other sex-symbol is like a god or goddess. In fact, it is very easy to fall into this trap of lingual similitude and simulation. The problem for us lies in our actual belief in the God-like authorities of men, like say, the President (god/magistrate) of the United States. Or how about the administrative judge (god/magistrate) that, through legal trickery, wishes to steal your child away in a custody hearing? We are cowed even by our so-called city councils, as if these men and women actually possess some god-like powers that we don’t. We pay taxes to pay the salaries of the municipal police that exact, extort, and beat us, and seldom do we even consider the thought of fighting back or protecting our friends, neighbors, or children from them! When fiction is blurred with Reality, when false gods are perceived as Real ones, then all hell breaks loose and becomes the organized criminal rackets of religion

and government.

METONYMY – _NOUN_ – IN RHETORIC, A TROPE IN WHICH ONE WORD IS PUT FOR ANOTHER; A CHANGE OF NAMES WHICH HAVE SOME RELATION TO EACH OTHER; AS WHEN WE SAY, ‘A MAN KEEPS A GOOD TABLE.’ INSTEAD OF GOOD PROVISIONS. ‘WE READ VIRGIL.’ THAT IS, HIS POEMS OR WRITINGS. ‘THEY HAVE MOSES AND THE PROPHETS,’ THAT IS, THEIR BOOKS OR WRITINGS. A MAN HAS A CLEAR HEAD, THAT IS, UNDERSTANDING, INTELLECT; A WARM HEART, THAT IS AFFECTIONS. _(Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)_

—=—

A king or legally appointed judge (magistrate) that commands all firstborn to die, for instance, is not the work of Jehovah, but of a false “God.” To blame God for the works of men acting as gods is ludicrous, yet isn’t that exactly what both the Christian and non-christen populations do? Judges are mandated by the queen to be called flatteringly in the title of “Lords,” but we must not confuse them as being Divine or of Jehovah. And the court records used to state that defendants prayed to the god of the court, which today reads plead or plea (_pray_) to the judge (_god_). Nothing has changed but the words used. The meaning is the same. A judge is a god in the legal realm — the realm that is not of Jehovah or Jesus Christ (Logos). What is God-like or godly is not Jehovah, only likened to It. A lover of God is obviously not Jehovah, yet is called “god” by the king (false God). Archons, a type of “gods,” and which the Gnostics considered to be as “demented brain parasites” that controlled the brains of men, is surprisingly not on this transliteration list, and are also not to be confused with the Supremacy of Being (verb) that is Jehovah. What is divinely inspired is not God, only representative of It (Truth), and therefore nothing that is Divine (Of Jehovah) should be mistaken for what is Divine action or words by men. To act divinely is a choice, not something that is automatically granted to some pope or king (false god) under a purely flattering title. What is a Godhead is not of Jehovah, only a simulation of It. What is a goddess is obviously not of Jehovah. There are no Gods before or equal to Jehovah, and there cannot be, for no “god” can be both lesser than and equal to the Whole. And so every usage of the word “God” in the Bible must be carefully examined. And the “blame” we often here against God for bad things happening to people or nations suddenly becomes clear as the fallacy it is, for man and man alone may be cruel and murderous to his own people. An Act of Nature has no intent, but to harmonize Nature Itself. Only men acting as gods, such as the very King James himself and his current bloodline successors and presidents, can be blamed for un-God-like events. Once this neutrality of Jehovah is understood both spiritually and about the physical Universe, it is only then that we may understand why we must stop emptily worshiping the symbology of Jesus Christ and start acting Christ-like ourselves, to stop respecting the authorities of the false gods of church and state, and to govern our own actions under the Law of God (Logos) and no other. There are no solutions to be found in the legal realm, for fiction will always subvert what is moral and just under the Law of Reality. We will not survive our collective institutions and unnatural science arts unless we change ourselves, each and every one, and stop respecting those corporations (governments and commercially driven artificial persons) and associations that are licensed to destroy that which sustains our very place and well-being in Nature. This is not a choice, it is a spiritual war already happening all around you, and it has already defeated many. For our choice is not by ballot or by claiming to be saved by religion, our choice is manifested by our actions. We either worship and protect God (Nature) or we sit and watch It burn. Empty religious words mean nothing, and many instances in the Bible speak to this fact, that he who calls himself as a “Christian” never knew Jesus Christ, for to know Christ is to act Christ-like in every thought and action. The world will not be saved by “Christians” of the over 1,000 denominations of false religion. It will be saved, if it can, by men without title, without pride, without ego, and without need of publishing and getting credit for their deeds. The Bible is clear as to what the law of man is intended for, the unrighteous man that is not self-governed by the Law of God:

—=—

“BUT WE KNOW THAT THE LAW IS GOOD, IF A MAN USE IT LAWFULLY; KNOWING THIS, THAT THE LAW IS NOT MADE FOR A RIGHTEOUS MAN, BUT FOR THE LAWLESS AND DISOBEDIENT, FOR THE UNGODLY AND FOR SINNERS, FOR UNHOLY AND PROFANE, FOR MURDERERS OF FATHERS AND MURDERERS OF MOTHERS, FOR MANSLAYERS, FOR WHOREMONGERS, FOR THEM THAT DEFILE THEMSELVES WITH MANKIND, FOR MENSTEALERS, FOR LIARS, FOR PERJURED PERSONS, AND IF THERE BE ANY OTHER THING THAT IS CONTRARY TO SOUND DOCTRINE…” _—1 Timothy 1: 8-10, KJB_

—=—

I am amazed that the typical, common citizen of every nation in _the world_ has no idea that they are by default legally declared as lawless and disobedient (incompetent), and that all public citizenships (persons) are wards of the state (voluntary slaves) because of this lack of self-governance. But how can one possibly know this to be so? The answer is right in the Bible above. Because we are in respect of the persons of men and under the legal law of man, which is the law of and over fictional persons (legal status). A man is free, unless he uses the property of another. A person is a status. A person is therefore a property of some nation. The Greek _persona_ means mask, or in other words, to pretend to be a person is to pretend to be some thing that one is not — to be clothed (masked) in false, legal persona and therefore under false law. A person is not a man. A person cannot follow Christ, for a person is not bound by God’s Law of Nature. What is unnatural is not in sameness with that of (belonging to) Nature. Man is a property of Jehovah, just as hydrogen is a property of water. But the water never believes it is anything but part of the Whole that is Nature (God). Man is the only Creature that suffers from such ridiculous belief systems, that he can own himself, be his own god, and thus follow his own self-perceived version of Logos (as false logic). And he has been convinced that he can be his own sovereign, when the only path to sovereignty is through self-governing, through Christ, which requires that there be only one Sovereign (God) and therefore one, always Highest Law. But instead, man hides behind fictional masks (persons) that carry the legal (artificial) title of pretended sovereignty (godhead). Man as god. The righteous need not such a legal system, for the righteous man is always self-governing, needing no mask (_persona_) to walk his path, for his path is of God not the legal system of citizenship, licenses, passports, and permits. The True follower of Christ acts the part of a Christ, of a son of God, while the false “Christian” bears only the empty, ceremonial and religious marks and signs of Christ, never attaining the substance for himself. The righteous man will not let that which is not of God’s Nature and Law into his life, nor respect that which is an invention of man to interfere with his ability to self-govern. His negative burden is to bear no mask, no ease, no false law. Yet the very purpose of every nation is to put men under the law of man and thereunder control our actions under a false law, including all “Christians” as members of corporate churches/religions. This is called legal freedom, which is not even close to religious freedom (the freedom to follow moral Law religiously in mind and in acts). Legal freedom is just another lie. As Orwell demonstrated, _freedom is slavery_. And in Truth, any type of freedom is indeed slavery to a chosen law. There is no freedom without law. The question is only whether that slavery is neutral or not, of the self or of legal force (contract), for to be a slave of Jehovah is only to fulfill ones destiny, to stand in husbandry and harmony with all of Nature and Its Law. If that’s slavery, sign me up! Quite simply, it is which law one chooses that defines the nature of one’s enslavement, no matter what status we pretend. The confusion of most Christians is that they may join a corporate church or religion and assume its corporate doctrines, and therefore become a Christian by ranting some line about being saved while continuing in a legal life of corruption and disrespect of every aspect of God’s Law, the Law being the Savior). Sorry, but the Bible is clear that this is not how it works. There is no Christian Church in the Bible, no religion but that of Christ, which is the Law (Logos) to follow. It is not an organization, not a corporation, and not a congregation. It is the path of a man following Law religiously (without excuse or error), and therefore one always consciously aware of each action he takes being in support of or against the Law of Jehovah. A slave of Jehovah is just as voluntary as a slave to men, to the legal church and state. Choose your Law, and by default you thus choose your master (God). The lawless and disobedient to Jehovah will be prisoners of war under the law of nations, as citizen-ships (vessels of commerce/mammon) thereof, though they may and are certainly free to patriotically believe otherwise in their foolishness, even while bearing the symbols of their supposed anarchy. We spend our lives learning to lie to ourselves and others through such nihilistically false righteousness of nationalism, the ultimate excuse under the law of man. We, the common goyim of the nations, are why the law of man and nations was created in the first place — to control prisoners of war and conquest under districts (nations) administrated by false gods. And yet most don’t realize their own legal disposition, though it is our default persona (legal status) at law, for no hope is placed by such governing gods upon the lawless to ever be self-governing, that is, to find Logos (Law) through the example of Christ. It’s not that they prevent us, only that they design our legal matrix in ways to ensure ignorance of the law. This is important, for ignorance of the law is never an excuse, but ignorance of the facts is perfectly excusable. It is impossible to be ignorant of the law and also voluntarily contracted under it, for the maxim of law states that to know the law and be under the law are considered in sameness, that is, assumption must be had that if one agrees to anything bound under the law that he must know the law, and that not knowing it is his fault alone. The law is clearly published and quite easily accessible. It must be public information and accessible in order to cause volunteerism (citizenship). Thus there is no hidden law, that is, no law that is unknowable, and so ignorance of the law is never an accepted excuse. The Truth is that no man in his right mind, that is, one that follows the Law of God through Christ, would ever volunteer to be placed under the contracted dis-ease that is the legal law and political systems of man. For God’s sake, just read the US Code, and you’ll find that you give permission for government to do all sorts of nasty things both to you and in your name, including murder, extortion, biological and chemical testing, imprisonment, seizure of assets, kidnapping of your children, rendition, and total control of the commercial economy, all because you have accepted and respected its persons and flattering titles under the totality of its false law. The fact is that false Christianity is so concerned with the “afterlife,” a word and concept not even found in the Bible, that they are willing to abandon the heaven (Nature) of Earth and Its Law to live instead in the hell of legal societies and nations that by default make them debtors, while their false churches promise them the dream of utopia once their slave-contracts are finished here on Earth. Again, this is not what the Bible promises, and nothing about the Bible is set in any life after physical death, for the Bible is the Law of Nature, of Reality, of this Life in eternity, not dead vessels with wandering, unknown souls. The heaven and hell of religion is not the heaven and hell of the Bible. Read it for yourself. Heaven is not a place, it is the result of the harmony of man with God’s Nature and Its Law. Never forget what is our place, our destiny in this voluntary hell of artifice we’ve allowed to be created around the Heaven that is Jehovah (Nature) unaffected by us… HELL – The name formerly given to A PLACE UNDER THE EXCHEQUER CHAMBER, WHERE THE KING’S DEBTORS WERE CONFINED. _(Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition)_

—=—

Remember, in the realm of legal fiction, a _king_ is a _god_. The exchequer (treasurer) is the courtroom, upon which another god (magistrate) sits. There is no debt without a treasury, and no bank without a courtroom and judge. The word _bench_ means _bank_. The judge (god) sits upon the bench and judges creditors and debtors. There is nothing else to judge therein, for all cases are monetary (of the exchequer). All crimes and cases are monetized. The nation is divided into three branches, the law executing god (Executive), the assembly of lawmaking gods (Congress), and magistrate gods (Judicial). This is a legal _truth_, that is, to anyone that is a citizenship of the nation. And without realizing it, the goyim citizenships in the United States now attend exclusively Executive courts, as the Department of Justice now exists therein. No court of the Judicial Branch is used for such petty affairs of the goyim in our debtors hell. We attend instead administrative courts. Why? Its simple. The judicial is for common (private) law amongst private men. The administrative court is just that, it administers the public persons (including corporations) of men, not men in and of themselves. Nothing living exists in the legal system. It administers commerce in a system rooted in the evils of money and mammon (false valuation) based on false, flattering titles and names (words on paper) that are the creation of (birthed as) property (status) of the United States corporation. In other words, the administrative courts operate over the commercial property (including persons) of the United States, never the property of God, and therefore certainly never over men. They are places of business between fictional persons, places, and things (nouns/names/titles). For men are not creations of these false gods and therefore cannot be administrated unless they respect the persons and flattering titles (properties), and therefore unless they are not self-governing under God’s Law, as followers of the personified Word/Logos/Jesus Christ. The respecter of persons will be governed by men under the law of persons because he cannot self-govern his own affairs. This is the Law. No person (status), no legal law. And to be clear, the fictional status of “illegal alien” only means that that man respects the person (legal status) of another nation, and so under the law of nations, is thus illegally present (in person) in some nation. No man is ever illegal unless he respects persons. And that is why the Bible instructs us that the respect and use of persons is against the Law of Nature. Any practice and respect of fiction is against the Law of Nature. This is self-evident Truth, but only from the perspective of Nature (Jehovah). The Law of Nature cannot protect anything created by the law of legal fiction. There are no persons or titles in heaven, only the Lawful, self-governing, forever persecuted sons of God. If there is no rest for the wicked, then the meek must at all times have the Word of God (Logos) at hand. To be meek is to be spiritually prepared under the Law of God for any and every situation… and the meek shall inherit the earth. What is the United States district, then? Answer: an open-air prison

for debtors.

But the even harder question is this: what, exactly, is a _debtor_? Answer: our opinion doesn’t matter. The answer to this question, within the legal and Biblical understanding that all US citizenships (persons) are in surety as debtors subject to the legal laws of the United States, allows us evermore clarity on why the Bible instructs us to never respect persons. To not respect persons or flattering titles is, at the same time, to not respect the authority of “creditors,” “debtors” or “debt.” These titles over men’s persons do not exist in Nature, for Nature is priceless, and debt requires artificial, monetary or other valuation (mammon). To understand what this means, we must first take money (the root of evil) out of the equation. Money is an induction tool and temptation to create debtors through desire and deceit, but money is not the source or substance of what is a debtor. A debtor is a citizen at birth. A debtor is a subject of some contracted law (dis-ease). He who is under contract is a debtor to (performer of) the law of that contract. In other words, regardless of what that contract entails, the signer of that contract or user of any property (implied or express) is therefore a performer under the will and law of that contract. A debtor is a performer of law. A citizenship of the United States is by default a debtor, a performer of US Code, etc. All persons (status) of the United States, as property of that corporation nation, are bound under the legal system of law of that nation and are therefore in performance debt to that

nation.

Consider that a cartoon may only exist and perform in the artificial cartoon realm, never in Nature. Likewise, a person (status) may only exist and perform in the legal (fictional) realm, never in Nature. A character in _The Matrix_ program may only ever exist in that simulated construct, never in Nature. Man may view the cartoon but never be the cartoon. Man may act as if he were a person (status) in agency but may never be that legal person or title. Man (as God’s Creation) only Exists in Nature, in Reality. And all his problems stem from accepting fictions and their law instead of God’s Nature and Law. The word _perform_ is legally defined as that which executes a contractual duty, which means that the performance debt ends when the contract is executed. Execution, in other words, brings fictional _death_ to the subject of that contract, as its required performance (life) thereunder is complete (executed). Citizenship is an endless performance debt until one becomes a self-governing man — a True follower of Christ (Logos/Law of God).T axes, for instance, are a debt to be performed (paid) by all public persons as scheduled by the gods of government. But the tax itself is not a monetary debt as much as it is a performance debt. There will always be new taxes, so one can never be free and clear, be it at the gas pump or the grocery store or the bank. The point of the tax (or fee) is to cause us all to perform unnatural, uncharitable, unloving acts in order to obtain government-owned and printed money to pay the tax. It’s not much different than throwing a ball for a dog that tirelessly jumps in a frozen lake to retrieve that ball. The dog is performing for its master’s pleasure, just as citizenships do. We are so inured with the punishment for not paying our taxes and fees that we forget there is no actual law that requires such a payment in Reality, in Nature. We forget the law of man is fictional, that the person (status) owes the tax and not us, except for our foolish contract of surety to that person (fictional character) against the Bible Law (Logos) that causes our performance or inversely allows us to be voluntarily punished. We forget the money has no actual value in Nature, which is priceless. The purposeful scarcity of the money causes legal performance (employment) in the nations, in debtors hell. In other words, the money is not the purpose of the tax, but is rather the causality of the action of fulfilling the taxing all persons (statuses) to exist. This was the reason behind the Revolutionary War, that the colonies had to pay the king in the king’s script of money only, not in any other form of currency, not in gold or silver, etc. They could not print their own money, and the king’s legal system made it difficult to acquire that specific script. If today you replace the word _king_ with the word _nation (district)_, then you have the same situation as then under a modernized, digital, nationalized money (mammon) system. Again, they care not about the money, only that its scarcity and law causes all of us to perform against our Nature, against God and Its Law. It keeps us fallen with no hope of rising again, for we are made to believe that only money (evil) can cause such a rise. Rising on the ladder of corporate status is not a spiritual rising, but one rooted in evil (money). We do not rise to overcome evil but to worship it in our fullest capacity. This is how we are controlled, our love being misdirected so easily by shiny objects and the false status of flattering titles. We are controlled and made to act satanic (adversarial to the Law of Nature) not by money itself but by respecting and loving (believing in) money as Real. To owe and pay the tax, men must use and respect persons and flattering titles so as to earn the specific government-issued money (property of government) to pay the tax that allows them to exist artificially in the persona (mask) of citizenship. Earning is the result of performing (employment), and like 100’s of millions of puppets we perform our asses off to satisfy the ponzi scheme that is this bulwark of public taxation requirements. Idle hands would have time to read the Bible, and would figure out that taxation is only possible through voluntary (legally contracted) slavery. Without the root of all evil, money, what possible incentive would anyone have to perform the average “job” in the United States? Most people would never do their current job charitably, that is, without being paid in mammon to do it. And we wonder why we are not happy? Never content? Money is not evil, but rather the root causality of all evil actions and behavior. We fight and even kill for what we love. And we defend the system that creates that which we love, be it God or mammon. This Truth is self-evident in our societies, being rooted in our wars, our commerce, and our many otherwise impossible

addictions.

Charitableness is True happiness. But remember, charity without legal license and permission is illegal in the United States, for charity is a religious freedom. If ones Highest Law is not Charity at all times under God and to all men, then one does not have the right to be Charitable. Legal charity is not Charity, it is a corporate person (status), nor is giving money to some corporation calling itself a charity. Charity is the actions a man takes toward everyone he may meet in life. Charity is the Law of God and has nothing to do with money and mammon (value). Legal charity is a financial scheme to make certain men wealthy. True Charity is a lifestyle and a requirement under the Law of God. Why is it illegal in the United States? Because True Charity and Forgiveness are the two actions that, if all men would take as their spiritual and Highest Law, would utterly defeat and destroy the legal system of men. It would cause money to be valueless, and thus all things in Nature to be priceless, including each of us toward each other. All crime is financial in origin, meaning that in some way all crime is because of some valuation in money. One cannot steal from another that is Charitable at all times, and so no such criminal intention need fester. There is no profit to make from True Charity, no usury or grocery, which is why government requires all charitable actions of its citizens to be reported as a monetary value, a deduction, or as a corporation. Most churches are section 501 “non-profit” corporations (artificial persons). Yet the Law is clear — respect no persons, for all are artificial, never of God’s Nature and Law. The point here is that a Truly 100% Charitable man under the Law of God cannot be a debtor. He cannot be enslaved by debt, for he is a Bible reading/following man. Likewise, a church cannot be a person (legal status/corporation), for to be a church is to be a people. The plural of person is persons, not people. People are not persons. Persons (legal status) are not People (flesh and blood). Persons (as citizenships/commercial vessels) of the United States are therefore not the People of the private States united listed upon the constitution and other laws. US persons are voluntary slaves in surety, subject to the will of the People (States). Persons are managed like cattle in a holding company called “United States” for the benefit of the private People. Status (persona) is everything in the legal realm, and yet it is nothing in God’s Kingdom. Without it, we cannot be ruled and _they_ cannot rule us. It is also interesting to note that the word _Job_, used as a name, carries the meaning of either “hated” or “persecuted,” and that the root of this word persecuted is to “be born” (think birth certificate). Remember that the word nation comes as well from the root “to be born.” Persons are of course birthed into the nation, both being fictions of the legal realm. So naturally a goyim born in the nations is automatically persecuted, for the law of nations, the law of men, is created for those unable to govern themselves — those that are disobedient to God’s Law of Nature. Remember also that to be employed by another is to be “used.” You see, once the religious and patriotic nonsense is removed from the equation, we find our actual disposition regarding both sets of opposing law, and how each is designed to defeat the other. The only religion needed thereof is to follow one of either of these systems of law religiously, without deviation, without temptation.

—=—

“And Elijah came unto all the people, and said, HOW LONG HALT YE BETWEEN TWO OPINIONS? IF THE LORD (_YĔHOVAH_) BE GOD, FOLLOW HIM: BUT IF BAAL, THEN FOLLOW

HIM.

And the people answered him not a word.” _—1 Kings 18: 21, KJB_

—=—

The Bible does not mince words here. It does not accept lukewarm behavior. It is clear that one cannot have one foot in God’s Law and one in mans law. This is impossible in two purposeful opposing sets of Law. Reality and fiction do not exist in the same realm, and therefore cannot be under the same law. Fiction is created to defeat the laws of the Real. And so when in Rome, do as the Romans do, the Bible declares. In other words, don’t pretend to be a a follower of Jesus Christ (Logos) while satanically following man’s legal system of law and existing falsely therein. God or mammon, this is a choice. But it is never a choice to follow two gods. And here we find the very reasons in the legal realm why we are not able to perform our God-given rights of the spiritual (Real) realm of Nature, for no person (legal fiction) has anything given to it by God but hatred and thus damnation. To be a legal person (status) under the legal system in citizenship to a nation, men must relinquish all God-given rights along with any claim to the negative protections of the Law of God’s Nature to become and remain such a goyim. The maxim of law is clear: _the contract makes the law_. I say to you again, the United States (district) is an open-air prison for debtors. The fool would offer the perspective that some citizenships have no debt to pay, that they are debt-free. But remember, a debtor has nothing to do with money, only performance under the law. Be you without monetary debt (credit) or completely bankrupt, you are equal in your legal, debtor status (persona) with regards to performing according to the law. And that law makes True Christian action and lifestyle illegal, for a man that claims to be of Christ without performing the part in his acts and under God’s Law has no right to call himself as such in the eyes of the law of the legal (anti-God) law. For to be metaphorically a citizen of God’s Kingdom of Nature, one must also perform under the Law of God, which means acting Christ-like at all times. In other words, “Christianity” is not a status (persona) but is more of an anti-status, or to be without legal status of any kind. This is once again a self-evident Truth. For the empty, flattering title “Christian” in and of itself causes no fear or respect from the legal system and its gods. Only the man that refuses respect of all such flattering titles and persons, including that of false “Christian,” can be Truly self-governing, for he never pretends to be anything he is not, and what he ever and eternally (without change) Is must be bound by the Law of God (Nature). The only Real Christian is he that performs his life and works according to Christ (Logos). The rest of us have settled ourselves in this debtors hell, performing wonderfully for all of the corporate, personified adversaries of Jehovah and Its Word/Law/Son, satanically speaking. And yes, I include myself amongst all the rest of us acting against God and Its Law, even as I search for and recognize these Truths daily. To be clear, I am not asking you to follow me. I am only showing you how to follow the True Logos as I uncover it for myself. For I believe there are those stronger than me that only need shown the way that they may walk the path. These are my works, my evangelism, if you will, and I will only be judged by That whose Word I speak. The path is clear. The choice to walk it, however, is clouded with many centuries of the false logic and writings (false logic) of self-gratifying men. It’s this morass of confusion and its resulting contagion of narcissistic pathos that I wish to uncover so that the Truth may shine and the path may become clear. If you still don’t understand what a _district_ is, as Washington, the District of (New) Columbia, then let me lay it out real simple for you. To district is to distrain. The word strain means blood, heraldry, as a strain of species, a strain of seeds. The DI added to the word strain, becoming distrain, means to take away that strain, that blood right, that family name and heraldry. Thus any connection to Nature (privacy) is removed for any man acting under a distraint (a district). Remember, all nouns come from the verb form of the same or similar word. Putting the pieces together, it goes like this: DISTRICT – _noun_ –  1. Properly, A LIMITED EXTENT OF COUNTRY; A CIRCUIT WITHIN WHICH POWER, RIGHT OR AUTHORITY MAY BE EXERCISED, AND TO WHICH IT IS RESTRAINED; a word applicable to any portion of land or country, or to any part of a city or town, WHICH IS DEFINED BY LAW OR AGREEMENT. A governor, a prefect, or a judge may have his _district._ Some of the states are divided into districts for the choice of senators, representatives or electors. Cities and towns are divided into districts for various purposes, as for school, etc. THE UNITED STATES ARE DIVIDED INTO DISTRICTS FOR THE COLLECTION OF THE REVENUE… _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)_ DISTRAIN – _verb transitive_ –  1. TO SEIZE FOR DEBT; TO TAKE A PERSONAL CHATEL FROM THE POSSESSION OF A WRONG-DOER INTO THE POSSESSION OF THE INJURED PARTY, TO SATISFY A DEMAND, OR COMPEL THE PERFORMANCE OF A DUTY; as, to _distrain_ goods for rent, or for an amercement. 2. TO REND; TO TEAR. _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)_ STRAIN – _noun – _1. A violent effort; a stretching or exertion of the limbs or muscles, or of any thing else. 2. AN INJURY BY EXCESSIVE EXERTION, DRAWING OR STRETCHING. 3. STYLE; CONTINUED MANNER OF SPEAKING OR WRITING; AS THE GENIUS AND _STRAIN_ OF THE BOOK OF PROVERBS. So we say, poetic strains, lofty strains. 4. Song; note; sound; or a particular part of a tune. Their heavenly harps a lower _strain_ began. 5. TURN; TENDENCY; INBORN DISPOSITION. Because heretics have a _strain_ of madness, he applied her with some corporal chastisements. 6. MANNER OF SPEECH OR ACTION. Such take too high a _strain_ at first. 7. RACE;GENERATION; DESCENT. HE IS OF A NOBLE _STRAIN._  8. HEREDITARY DISPOSITION. Intemperance and lust breed diseases, which propagated, SPOIL THE _STRAIN_ OF A NATION.  9. RANK; CHARACTER. _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English

Language)_

STRAIN – _verb transitive_ –  1. To stretch; TO DRAW WITH FORCE; to extend with great effort; as, to _strain_a rope; to _strain_ the shrouds of a ship; to _strain_ the chords of an instrument. 2. To cause to draw with force, or with excess of exertion; TO INJURE BY PRESSING WITH TOO MUCH EFFORT. He strained this horses or his oxen by overloading them. 3. To stretch violently or by violent exertion; as, to _strain_ the arm or the muscles. 4. TO PUT TO THE UTMOST STRENGTH. Men in desperate cases will _strain_themselves for relief. 5. To press or cause to pass through some porous substance; TO PURIFY OR SEPARATE FROM EXTRANEOUS MATTER BY FILTRATION; TO FILTER; as, to _strain _milk. Water may be stained through sand. 6. To sprain; TO INJURE BY DRAWING OR STRETCHING. Prudes decayd about may tack, _strain_ their necks with looking back. 7. TO MAKE TIGHTER; TO CAUSE TO BIND CLOSER. To _strain_ his fetters with a stricter care. 8. TO FORCE; TO CONSTRAIN; TO MAKE UNEASY OR UNNATURAL. _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)_DI – A prefix, A CONTRACTION OF DIS, denotes from, SEPARATION OR NEGATION, or two. _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)_

—=—

Remember, the word DIS is one of the names Dante used for the devil, for satan. Indeed, when DIS is added to a word it generally takes away or acts ADVERSARIAL TO that which is the root word. It negates the purpose of the root. To have ones strain taken away (as di-strain) is to have ones blood consideration (inherent, inheritable, and God-given rights) taken away according to law (contract/status). In other words, to be in distraint (districted) is to be disconnected (separated) from our private, family bloodlines and placed into a limited district, an open-air prison for debtors. In other words, to district (distrain) a man is to separate him from his Source, to separate us from our very Nature, from our self-evident destiny and purpose therein. The nation exists to separate us from God (Jehovah) through legal fictions and false doctrine (law). The nation exists to make men gods (magistrates) over each other and over their own false law. Patriotism is the celebration and worship of open satanism (false gods and their legal law of nations). Patriotism is a slave’s best attempt at justifying his own lack of responsibility and thus abandonment of God’s Law. And as Samuel Johnson put it, _patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel. _What he referred to was exactly all of us, as men of great moral delinquency. For all men acting as legal persons are, according to the Law of Nature, indeed living in scoundrelism toward God’s Law. To be insulted by this self-evident Truth is to be insulted by nothing more than the proper definitions of words. The reader may attack the messenger (myself), but that will never solve the problem of the readers ignorance of language and lack of neutrality on the subject. Johnson merely spoke the Truth, according to law, by the very definition of this word, for all persons are scoundrels by contract. All persons are required by legal law to follow the law of men. Neutrally speaking, Johnson didn’t actually insult anyone by this statement, but merely told the Truth by correct definition of terms. It only sounds insulting because chances are the common man in nativity (born captivity), as a goyim of the nation, has no idea he is acting at all times outside of the Law of God, believing that his immoral actions under the legal law somehow places him and his nation upon the right-hand side of God. Nothing could be further from the Truth than such patriotic nonsense. But then, what really is the difference between worshiping false gods in the idolatry of legalized adultery (citizenship) and being patriotic towards them? Patriotism is merely the unprovable religion of the goyim, the worship of fiction as God-given. There is no more dangerous religion than patriotism, of mutual, institutionalized scoundrelism. VILLAIN – An opprobrious epithet, implying GREAT MORAL DELINQUENCY, AND EQUIVALENT TO knave, rascal, or SCOUNDREL. THE WORD IS LIBELOUS.

_(Black4)_

—=—

Do not distress, for the type of scoundrel, the classic villain in our organized criminal society most often referred to here is the one propped up by the bloodline of their fathers, a necessary patriot by his own birth. The most notable scoundrel is the politician, the publican, as he who attains flattery of title only by his accident of birth, stepping at all times upon his fore-father’s coattails but never filling that emperors clothing. The greatest base of scoundrels are those sitting in congress, the Senate, and whom act as the godheads of major corporations that their fathers created. But what is worse, the known villain and scoundrel that clings to his fathers legacy, or the common subject with no pedigree that latches on like a leech to them for some shitty public status (persona) and low title that will never be higher than those bestowing them? Of course the masses that refuse to or cannot govern themselves under the Highest Law would instead choose to be patriotic towards their slave-masters, who not only _legally_ (artificially) forgive their sins but create job titles in the epitaph of those sins! What employee is not patriotic toward the corporation (artificial person) that he works for and gets paid in mammon from? What bomb-maker can also claim to be a pacifist or peacemaker? What agent exists without a principal? What citizen can also be a follower of Christ? What patriot can possibly believe that God is on his or her nations side? This paradoxical state of thought can only exist in one that is either a victim or a villain, a subject or a master. And that defines everyone in the nation and everyone controlling it. The patriot is nothing more or less than he who refuses to bite the hand that feeds it, he that has no status or flattering title without it and its military force. What follower of Logos (Jesus Christ) could possibly be a patriot to any nation? I suppose the answer to that question lies in the same ignorance that allows that same man to join a corporate religion and call his or her self by that religious title, though it is nowhere to be found in the Bible, and it breaks the rule of I AM (self-existence). Why would I consider it any different or any less of a logical fallacy to support the institution of the state over or equal to the church? Both are legal (anti-God/antichrist) entities created by men to enslave other men under false law.

—=—

…THAT THOU MAYST BE BY KINGS, OR WHORES OF KINGS; BOAST THE PURE BLOOD OF AN ILLUSTRIOUS RACE, IN QUIET FLOW FROM LUCRECE TO LUCRECE; BUT BY YOUR FATHERS’ WORTH IF YOURS YOU RATE, COUNT ME THOSE ONLY WHO WERE GOOD AND GREAT. GO! IF YOUR ANCIENT BUT IGNOBLE BLOOD HAS CREPT THROUGH SCOUNDRELS EVER SINCE THE FLOOD, GO! AND PRETEND YOUR FAMILY IS YOUNG, NOR OWN YOUR FATHERS HAVE BEEN FOOLS SO LONG. WHAT CAN ENNOBLE SOTS, OR SLAVES, OR COWARDS? Alas! not all the blood of all the Howards. * * * * *WHO WICKEDLY IS WISE, OR MADLY BRAVE, IS BUT THE MORE A FOOL, THE MORE A KNAVE. WHO NOBLE ENDS BY NOBLE MEANS OBTAINS, OR, FAILING, SMILES IN EXILE OR IN CHAINS, LIKE GOOD AURELIUS LET HIM REIGN, OR BLEED LIKE SOCRATES, THAT MAN IS GREAT INDEED. _–Alexander Pope (1688-1744), from ‘An Essay On Man,’ Epistle

IV_

—=—

Most important to comprehend here is that a district is that which is _defined by law or agreement_. So, too, are the persons created within that district defined by law. Man is not defined by any fictional law. Man is the creator of legal law, not the other way around, just as the Law of God (Logos) is not the Creator of God (Jehovah). Law does not Create what is Real, only fictions come from and are of law. The constitution and the inherent rights it protects in men does not apply to those persons (legal statuses/citizens) that are birthed in and thus domiciled in that United States district. Persons are not men, are not Creations of God. To be defined by (created by) mans law is to be a property of it. And what does the Highest Law say again… Oh yeah! TAKE NO OTHER DOCTRINE (LAW) BEFORE THE BIBLE. Take no lie before the Truth. Take no false logos or statuses of men. Take no replacements for Christ (Law). The purpose of nations and the law of nations is to district the world and its people, to defeat our connection to our God, and thus to dis-strain that which is at all God-like (Christ-like) from our essence of Being and action. Its design is literally, physically and spiritually, to rob us of our destiny. The law of nations is nothing more and nothing less than that which is designed to replace the Law of God (Logos) with the law of men. I cannot dissect this any further. The Truth is obvious just as the anti-truth that is the legal system is obvious. It is a question of choice. But as we can see, only the initial choice matters, for all that follows the initial choice is controlled by the choice-less causality of whatever Law we maintain to support according to our initial choice. Thus, we may understand why the Bible has been stripped from government sponsored public schools and discourse. For to teach the Law of God is to teach that there is another choice than being governed by man’s false law in personhood. To teach the Highest Law is to specifically teach and thus defeat the purpose of the Nation and its lesser law. To teach the goyim (common citizenry) of the nation that knowledge if the Bible which would remove the very legal mark of being a goyim (beast/slave) makes no economic or national sense, if you have empathy for these devil gods (creators and profiteers) of the nation. And isn’t that what our history books teach, to believe in (respect) through Stockholm Syndrome the “fathers” as gods (creators/constitutors) of this nation, which the constitution clearly states is under the international law of nations? Are we not taught to take such false gods and their successors, in the form of congress and its president, as our own modern version of those legal fathers (gods/creators)? How does one show an entire population, of any and every nation, that we are practicing openly a form of satanism, of adversarial-ness to God and Its Law, by being members of such nations and false religions? How can I possibly convince the typical, brainwashed “Christian” that everything he or she does is in fact antichrist by design of the nation and its legal matrix code of false law and corporatization of religion, causing religions to follow the law of man, never God. It is not as if these facts aren’t obvious to one that wishes to see and hear them, its just that he who says these truths openly is shunned and persecuted. For True followers of Christ are Truth-tellers, and it is Truth that is persecuted, not men with flattering titles lying to themselves behind a golden cross around their neck. How can I possibly defeat such an adversary as the purposeful ignorance and institutional banning of the Bible in Its intended substance? For my part, this open and free and persecuted work of imparting these Truths is all I can do, which is like standing in front of a purposeless stampede with my bare hand up, with nought but an appeal to some stolen reasoning that perhaps we all might possess if our mothers and fathers had been well-read in the Bible. I cannot part the sea of commerce, I can only tell you what is the purpose and destination of the part. And Jesus Christ showed us how to walk upon that sea without sinking into and drowning under its depths of debt. For though the law of the sea has been artificially extended over the legally defined land and its law, that fictional water of mammon need not steal us away, if we but follow the law and walk as if no such lie (artificial water of commerce) exists. There is no commerce in True Charity and in Love and in Forgiveness. And forgiveness defeats all possible debts imaginable

by any adversary.

Jesus answered the question (above) by stating that we must rend (render) back to Caesar (the district/that which distrains, distresses, and seizes) what is (the property) of Caesar. Give back that which causes a performance debt. Give back the person (status) and titles that distrain us under the law of Caesar, the false god of any nation. To be under any district is to be rendered, to be torn asunder from our roots, our blood consideration, our place in Nature as the _I Am_ with unalienable rights from God. This is not religion, this is exactly how the law works. Dismiss it at your own convenience or take it to heart. Either way, my duty is fulfilled, even upon those that _have no eyes to see or ears to hear_. But what would happen then? What would we have left in our “name” if we rendered it back to Caesar? When considering an ancient society of men that lived by the Law of Nature, or that which is self-evidently the way we should treat and actually respect each other as parts of the same Whole, as the _I Am_, I find this particular quote to be the perfection of that example. This is Truly what it means to live in the Likeness of Christ, in and as the I AM, the actualization and manifestation of Logos. This is the death of ego, the destruction of the false

id-entity:

—=—

“NO ONE PAID ANY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO WORTHY MEN, NOR DID THEY SINGLE OUT THE MAN OF ABILITY. RULERS WERE SIMPLY THE HIGHEST BRANCHES ON THE TREE, AND THE PEOPLE WERE LIKE DEER IN THE WOODS. THEY WERE HONEST AND RIGHTEOUS WITHOUT REALIZING THAT THEY WERE “DOING THEIR DUTY.” THEY LOVED EACH OTHER AND DID NOT KNOW THAT THIS WAS “LOVE OF NEIGHBOR.” THEY DECEIVED NO ONE YET THEY DID NOT KNOW THAT THEY WERE “MEN TO BE TRUSTED.” THEY WERE RELIABLE AND DID NOT KNOW THAT THIS WAS “GOOD FAITH.” THEY LIVED FREELY TOGETHER GIVING AND TAKING, AND DID NOT KNOW THAT THEY WERE GENEROUS. FOR THIS REASON THEIR DEEDS HAVE NOT BEEN NARRATED. THEY MADE NO HISTORY.“

_—Chuang Tzu_

—=—

And then we ate of the forbidden fruit of the tree of useless information, of names and flattering titles, of mammon and of unnatural logic and perception. Why do I stress that history is a dead, at best second hand art-form that can bring no good to anyone? Because the True heroes under God need not their name or other flattering title attached to their works. Their works are of God, and only God may judge them accordingly. Men such as the “founding fathers” and other broods of men that have been falsely made into deities and idols for the Godless men (goyim) of the nations lay signature to their works, for the legal law of man requires such things. The devil always needs consent, always requires a signature. They did not make history, they made fictions. God’s Realm is timeless. God issues no calendars as men (false gods) do, so history is, spiritually speaking, a mute point. It is those men without legal names and titles that will be ignored by the annals of man’s legal recreations. It will be we who choose to overcome such menial and base, low confections of the rewards of men that will be charged by the history books of men as unaccomplished and unmentionable. The story of Jesus Christ is intended to be the same, though one cannot tell the story of the Law without personifying It into a storied form. To respect only the history of Jesus Christ “the man” is to miss the entirety of the story of eternal (timeless) life, of life not lived in the artificial construct of the Roman, Jewish, and other calendars. The story of Christ is and shall always be a timeless one, for just as Jehovah, as Nature Itself, as the Universe, the Law is unchanging. The great men of God, a word that represents all time and space of Eternal Existence, of what Is, what Was, and what shall Be in the Creation cycle of Eternal Life and Law (Logos), which we would vulgarly and without spirituality call as the “history” of man’s extremely limited recordings of logic-based perceptions and intent to use such “history” as a political, moral, and spiritual weapon… the great men of God are merely those that Lived to suffer for their firm obedience to God’s Law. These have but two places in man’s journals, either as wrongly accused (judged by men) prisoners of the church and state, or as the blank pages unkept for those who had no legal name or title to mention, no blood connection to the elitists, whom instead stood absolutely and without wavering against the very evils of the legal systems of the corporate (married) church and state. To these anonymous men I pay my humble respect, but call no man as my father. And to those so-called “founding fathers” of the United States, those Biblically known as “Philadelphians” whose only creation was a corporation called Washington, the new District (Caesar) of Columbia, they exist now only as the genealogical records of blood and title that allow completely irrelevant men to become their legally appointed sons in congress. In their death, their grandsons and daughters emerge to carry on their “fore-fathers” legacy in the very same corporation and District of Washington, that of of total enslavement of the common man to their incorporated benefit as false, legal gods. The next time you are asked why Jesus Christ is not mentioned in any other history books or works besides the Holy Bible, you may now know the answer. The Bible is not a history, but a Law Book. Jesus Christ is not part of man’s romantic history, but is the eternal Law of God. Christ made no history any more than he was a historical figure, for history is always a lie of men, and usually told only by the victorious ones. No history can be written of the unwritten (Natural) Law, for it necessarily Existed before man ever could. Until men start acting Christ-like, we will all continue to be made the personified history of the Roman calendric legal system. History does not exist in Nature, for history cannot also exist in the present. There is no rewind button in this eternity, nor does eternity ever question its own history, for what is is what was and what shall be, and there will be and has been nothing new under the sun. Think about it. Debt cannot exist without the tracking of time, i.e. history, nor can the pretended historical age of anything in the present. History is not of God, only a device of men. What is debt without a specific time to pay it? What power and control would debt have over men if they had no limits of time to pay or perform that debt to? Without man’s artificial tracking and devices of time-keeping despite the timelessness of Jehovah, no time-based or date-based payments could be demanded or paid. To make no history is to follow Christ without want or desire to call any action as a historical thing, to act without title (property), without debt, without contract, and thus without expectation of carnal rewards (credit) such as a side note in man’s false historical context. All actions of history are forgiven and therefore given no respect, be they of love or of charity or of hate, for all past actions are but non-present (non-existing) deeds done by empty names (form without substance). Christ never blamed the past for his present state of Being, nor did he blame his Father when he found himself helpless and seemingly trapped in this world of men, though he certainly begged the question. All True Charity under God is done in good will to men, not persons, not titles (like “the poor”), but to nameless men that have no more qualification for being due Charity than need itself. There is no debt in purely Charitable acts, and therefore you get no credit for acting Charitable. You are not a hero of historical tales for merely following naturally the Law of God. One does not act Charitably to receive thanks but to give thanks (to share God’s blessing with others). One does not give gifts only to receive gifts, but to celebrate the act of giving and the happiness such actions fulfill in the soul. The story of the follower of Christ will not be narrated. We will not make history any more than we will respect it. To Live in and be Free by the Truth is an ode to the future, not the past. History will save no man, presently, for no man exists in any history. The Timeless, Living God is not history. Can you even imagine this anymore? They had no name or status for their lifestyle, instead merely existing in love, charity, forgiveness, and kindness to one another, never even fathoming that there could possibly be an adversarial, opposite lifestyle to such a perfect one as this. There simply was no legal law, no evil to be tempered by artifice. There was no reason to steal, to fight, to harm, or to kill. They lived purely in the self-evident realm of God and Its Law, in harmony with Nature and each other. They knew and respected no lies or legal fictions. And like it or not, this is the only way, the only path out of this legal matrix system. Again, we cannot overthrow it, for power corrupts absolutely. We must overcome it. We must strive to be in the _I Am_ as quoted above. Some might argue and rightly so that this type of lifestyle is susceptible to all sorts of evils, not the least of which is the force of some military or gang. I make no qualms about this. And would simply remind the detractor that as a citizen of any nation, you are also equally as susceptible to such violent force, in fact, even more so. You accept this as part of your volunteerism into society. You are in an open-air prison kept by the United States military. And my only response would be this: if I could but for one day live in such a way as described above I would release myself of all possessions, of all money, of all title, and therefore my place in the artificial cycle of Roman calendric history and dwell within that short-lived utopia like a drunkard bathing in a barrel of beer, if only to experience such a True Love as no-one alive today has ever known before. One day of Logos actualized is worth 1,000 lifetimes in this legal hell. If you don’t agree, and you find the urge to continue in your contrarian efforts, then you may use yourself as the example of why men like me find it impossible to find Peace. You insist on annihilating any idea of harmony with God because the melancholic depression of nihilism is perhaps all you may ever know. Detraction and obfuscation has become your sport, and no longer a purpose-driven mantra of past revolutionary times. The drowning man will attempt to drown his savior if only to get the last breath, the last possession between two doomed

men.

The law of man, that is, the legal matrix and systems of nations, is hell incarnate. Organized chaos. Lawlessness dressed up as a melancholic system of justice and peace. In reality, the legal law in any form is nothing more or less than anarchy (lawlessness) against God, against Logos, against the Harmony and Law of Nature. There is no other purpose for any other law (doctrine) than to be different from, opposite to, and to defeat the Law of Nature. Lies are created for one and only one purpose, to battle with Truth (God), to pretend what is self-existent and self-evident is somehow not Truth. Nations (corporations/districts) are the abodes of sinners. They are artificial places where men break the Law of God continuously, as a lifestyle, and yet have the audacity to flatter each other and self-proclaim themselves as “Christians.” No son of God Exists in this fictional Hades. No man of God is legally birthed into these corporate municipal zoos. No follower of Christ would follow so many false gods as are present therein. And no son of God would take nay other Law but that of his True Father (Creator). Welcome to the grand

delusion…

—=—

“WE (MEN) ARE GOING TO BECOME GODS. PERIOD. IF YOU DON’T LIKE IT, GET OFF. YOU DON’T HAVE TO CONTRIBUTE. YOU DON’T HAVE TO PARTICIPATE. BUT IF YOU’RE GOING TO INTERFERE WITH ME BECOMING GOD, WE’RE GOING TO HAVE BIG TROUBLE. WE’RE GOING TO HAVE WARFARE. THE ONLY WAY YOU CAN PREVENT ME… IN THIS… IS TO KILL ME. YOU KILL ME,

I’LL KILL YOU.“

_–Richard Seed, Physicist, human cloning researcher_

—=—

If you do not think we are at war, in every way possible, then you will become one of _them _even in your blindness. Of course, there is no place to get off, no exemption to stop participating, in this now global legal system. Conform to technology or die, that is the only choice offered. Thus, this system and men like this must be overcome. We must leave (circumcise) ourselves from it all. The question is, will you die to fulfill your purpose, your destiny, your duty to God’s Nature, or will transhumanists like this be your new gods? Will you join them or fight them to the death to preserve Creation from being re-created in this psychopath’s image? The time to choose is upon you. The gauntlet has just been laid before

you.

We know what is sound doctrine, for we are not to take any other doctrine (law) but the Word of God (Logos/Truth). What else is or can be sound but Truth? What else would any sane man ever wish God to be but Truth? No doctrine (law) of man should be respected. Why? The answer is obvious. Man’s law is at any time alterable, changeable, while the opposite is True of the Law of Nature (God), for Jehovah is defined as that which is unchanging. Here again we find what is self-evident Truth, and it breathes into our soul a beautiful, spiritual sense of confidence. Only without such respect and false confidence in the law of men may the superstructures built by men through unsound doctrine (law) fail, as does any strength or authority perceived in the flattering titles created as fictions of (belonging to) law. Why? Because all of mans creations are self-evidently temporary. End of story. In examining this list above, we see that _Logos_ is actually not translated into the word _God_ (Jehovah) or any other form or implication of godhood at all. In other words, _Logos_ is not even a word translated to “God” in the Bible! Yet It’s also apparently not quite something else entirely either. Logos is not exclusive of Jehovah, yet It keeps the balance and ensures the Life and Force of what is that multitude of the parts of the Whole. But it seems that only men may screw It up, which is why the Bible story of Christ (Logos personified as a moral teaching story) was inspired to be our example of the Divine Law of Nature and thus between each other. Perhaps Noah Webster stated it best in his 1828 dictionary in his definition of the word _withdraw_, again letting us know that the Existence of Jehovah is not a choice and certainly not predicated upon any vulgar belief or non-belief by men, where he stated that: “IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT GOD SHOULD _WITHDRAW_ HIS PRESENCE FROM ANY THING.” Jesus Christ is also noted for suggesting that if one examines a piece of wood, that in that wood He (Logos) can be found, _He_ being of course metaphorically referential to the Law of Nature. Dive into the ocean, and the Law of Nature (Logos) is there. Jump off a high cliff, and unfortunately for you, the Law of Nature is there and will break and crush you in your ignorance of that Law. Man calls it gravity, as if such a force of Nature could be created or “discovered” by man. The Force of what man named as “gravity,” as a result of the Law of Nature, was never covered in the first place that it needed discovering. But in ignorance of this ego-defeating, self-evident, self-Existent Truth, men worship themselves as if they invented Logos by naming it. We offer many flattering, scientific titles to singular parts of the permanence of Jehovah, pretending that each part is separate from the Whole, and thus attempting to control and alter the harmony of that which is the Whole to our benefit. Now imagine what wondrous and beautiful miracles could happen if we but worshiped and protected the harmony of the Whole over the exploitation of Its parts? Perhaps we are so corrupted now that this is indeed unimaginable to most, which would necessarily mean that True Christianity is also impossible for us. And perhaps that means we should start building arks because a serious flood is needed ’round here! This statement of definition by Webster is not mere speculation or belief, nor does it in any way intend to offer a choice to the reader to believe or not believe in Jehovah (God). The sentence demands a lack of such foolishness of expressive ignorance as nihilism and atheism. This is a definition based on the definition and intention of the word _Jehovah_ as used in the Bible. Again, Webster is not offering his opinion. There is no Creation without the presence of Jehovah (Creator), by whatever name any man wishes to call It. More to the point, what Exists self-evidently is part and therefore present within what is Jehovah (God). Man cannot escape or somehow leave the realm of God (Nature). He cannot believe his way out of his own Nature of Existence and Its Law. As a part of the Whole, man cannot Exist without the presence of the Whole. And so the Law of Nature (Logos) is impossible without the presence of that which causes It to Exist, which is why it is called the Law of God, or metaphorically as God’s Word (Logos). We may understand God’s Law as our own and become self-governing by studying the example of Christ, the Law of Nature (Logos) personified, as the Highest Law recognized by all self-entitled “Christian” nations. The nation is never “Christian” because the nation is a fiction of man, not a man. But the recognition of Christianity as the foundation of the common law in both England and America especially reveals that God’s Law is the Highest when we act Christ-like. A son of God knows and respects no fictions, no persons (status), no titles of any authority (flattery), and accepts no lies in place of the Truth of Nature (God) and Its Law. We may only practice God’s Word (Law) by acting Christ-like. In this way alone we are deemed to be the sons of God. To dispute this either legally or in Reality is a fools errand. Believe me, I’ve tried all my life. Don’t waste any more of yours playing the fool. If, according to logicians and self-prescribed, flatteringly titled “scientists,” Logos is something that changes or is indeed somehow controlled chaos, at least according to man’s perceptions of it, while Jehovah (God) is a verb meaning the Supreme Being (self-Existence) and permanence of all that Is, Was, and will Be, as the unchanging God or Oneness of all Existence (Being), then perhaps the proper question to gain understanding here is to ask: what is the Source of Logos. In other words, what is the Source of the Law of Nature? Is it man? Can it be man? Is it the logical conclusions of the mind of men and the artful sciences they pretend to _know_ without experience about the entirety of the Universe. Jehovah is defined as the Source of all self-Existence, of Life, of all the Universe, and most importantly, all that is not man-made. So is the Source of Logos that which is man-made or that which is a Creation of God? Ah, now we are getting somewhere. This question might very well bake your noodle before we answer it, and yes, we will certainly answer it herein…There is no higher Source than Jehovah (as defined). This is a foundational, self-evident knowledge. So where does that leave Logos? What is the Source of Logos? If Logos is not God, then that can only mean that Logos emanates from one of two sources, man or Jehovah (God)? Can change indeed be said to come from such an unchanging Source? Or is this definition in philosophy tainted by the desires and delusions of men? Can Law (Logos) be a Source in and of Itself, or must there be a Source (Creator) of that Logos? For what would the Law of Nature (Logos) be without the never-ending perpetuity of the

Creation of Nature?

The purely unspiritual, logical, scientific response would be that it is ridiculous to assume that the Universe, that Nature itself is not in a constant flux of change, and that mans current perception (best guess) of the current change therefore is God. But this would redefine God as that which always changes, and thus Logos would also be in constant change. This is ironic, since at the very heart of proper science is the factor of predictability, of the unchanging reproduction of results in any experiment. But how is that possible in a forever changing Universe? Perhaps the seemingly paradoxical statement by French critic Jean-Baptiste Alphonse Karr (1808 – 1890), usually translated in English as “the more things CHANGE, the more they STAY THE SAME,” allows us to consider how the Universe and Its Law and Laws of Nature work. Let me explain… If I ring a bell, I have caused a change, a disruption in the normal (harmonious, inactive) state of that banded metal. Yet if I come back in an hour, I find that what I changed is no longer present, and that the bell has settled back into its most harmonious state of Existence within Nature and Its Law. There is no vibration or ring without my purposeful disruption of that bells state of ease (harmony). Is this not the Nature and crude model of the entirety of the Universe? Does not Nature eventually grow back to reclaim the scorched earth, and is this not Nature attempting to fulfill its unchanging state of Being (self-Existence)? Are not the architectural ruins of mans previous civilizations merely the rebirthing process of Nature repossessing man’s follies of construction, in order to cause that change to become part of the sameness it was before it was forcibly altered by mans designs and inventions? It is certainly no irony that those ruins with pure, unadulterated stone as their foundations and walls have withstood the test of “time” and weather patterns more so than others, for they are closest to being in harmony with God’s Creation and Law. Are not the predictable patterns of weather evidence of an unchanging Logos? It is never that the Law and Laws of Nature are actually changed, it’s that man’s interference temporarily obfuscates the Law until that which man invents is reclaimed back into Nature. For the Law of Nature will always outlast the law of man, and certainly outgrow his devices and great cities. The Earth, indeed, the Universe, will always be in sameness. The more it changes, the more it stays the same. The problem is that a change might last one thousand years, or one million years, before Nature resolves and causes reclamation and thus restoration of that change back into that which is unchanging. Man views the temporary, changing scab that covers the wound as that which is permanent, or in other words, that constant change is the definition of Nature, that the changes he witnesses in his short span of life are absent of purpose or Design. All change in Nature is for the purpose of harmonizing Itself back into the unchanging Nature of the Universe. In Nature, the purpose of any temporary change is ultimately to achieve sameness. While the form (appearance) may change, the substance does not. Mans perception of that which is unchanging (God) is unfortunately the same as the result of the ever-changing vibration of the bell. For mans individual lifespan is so infinitesimal compared to the Whole of Jehovah that he confuses the temporary change he witnesses as the actual state of unchanging Existence. He witnesses the change but never the end result of the change. He simply does not live long enough. In other words, he that believes in change as the Nature of the Universe is he that believes God does not Exist, that the Universe is not a Living, unchanging Being. And so this man cannot fathom an unchanging, Supreme Law over an unchanging Universe. In this way a sense of evil arises in the minds of men, a sense of false godliness THAT CAUSES MEN TO PURPOSEFULLY CREATE CHANGE BY BREAKING THE LAW AND LAWS OF NATURE. And that is the whole point of the Bible and Its Law, that men cannot Create as God does in eternal and unchanging perpetuity. Man can only create that which is a TEMPORARY change to God’s Law and Creation of Nature. What man creates, builds, devises, and invents is equivalent to the temporary ring of a bell, which, though it may last for the length of his own lifetime and that of his grandchildren, is in Reality (under God) but a festering pimple that comes and goes, only temporarily disrupting Nature’s unending claim and Law. Now just imagine if all we did as a species, as God-fearing societies, was in harmony with Nature and Its Law? Can you? Or is the first thing your corrupted mind can think of is _well, where will the money come from to build it? _Mammon is indeed the underlying architect of the legal

matrix.

And this is the root problem with literalist, logic-based thinking. Without metaphor, without poetic, beautiful speech in spirituality, empathy is completely lost, and the substance of everything is lost to its perceived-but-empty-of-life-and-substance form. Society is become a narcissistic copy of itself, gazing only at its own sick and twisted beauty as one might contemplate a painting by Dali, Pollack, or Picasso. We are slowly realizing the empty, post-modern impressions of ourselves. Life has become art, artifice, delusion on a grand scale. The prediction of sun and moon cycles, the Farmer’s Almanac, and other important scientific wonders all rely on the unchanging (predictable) Universe (Jehovah), as do the customs of those men that utilize them. But most men have become so ignorant of themselves and their Nature and Law that they have no idea where their food originates from. _God will provide_ has been replaced with _government will provide_, for government is a nest of false gods (magistrates). The word Jehovah, in other words, does not attempt to represent that which is frozen in time, but a sense of cosmic, spiritual Design in eternity. One thing is sure in these modern and possibly end times for man on Earth, that science began as the innocent, inquisitive study of the unchanging design of Nature and slowly morphed into a corporate, for-profit, unspiritual demon that specifically seeks to change and exploit that which is the unchanging Nature and Law of Existence. Science went from the study of that which is unchanged and thus in perfection to the purposeful raping and pillaging of Its very microcosmic structure for the purpose of changing Nature’s perfect Design for the desires of corrupt men that know not and have utter disrespect toward the Law of God’s Nature (Logos). Modern science is literally a crime against Nature. It is so far removed from the Law of Nature that they call the study of Nature as a mere offshoot of the “sciences,” as “natural science,” as if somehow all other “sciences” are not conceived and practiced upon God’s Nature and should therefore be held accountable to God’s Law. Science, in other words, is strictly a legal (anti-God) term in man’s world. It is not science at all, it is sodomy against Nature, against Life and Its precious cycles of pro-Creation. Science creates nothing that is pro-Creation, only anti-Creation, for mans inventions are never of God, never bound by or in harmony to the Design of Nature. For there is, again, nothing new under the sun. How many of us have mistaken these two concepts, the words of man and the Word of God (logos/Logos) as being in sameness? The answer, as we will uncover, may very well include yourself and every “Christian” and “non-Christian” you know! Have you noticed that most self-proclaimed “Christians” don’t act at all Christ-like? Is this misunderstanding of Logos the reason behind that abhorrent behavior? I’m positive this is so. For the Truth is that Logos worship (idolatry) has taken over and polluted modern “Christianity.” And I ask the reader to allow me to prove this here, now, before attacking me as the messenger. I promise that all will be clear by the end of this, my plea for religious and spiritual sanity and reason, and that only good, actual scripturally spiritual things may come of what is presented, defined, questioned, and concluded here. However, it may very well be against the false doctrines of your denominated corporation calling itself a “Christian” religion, for modern “Christianity” indeed has absolutely nothing to do with the substance of the Bible or Jesus

Christ.

I believe, in fact, that this is the most important comparative essay I have ever written, both for the benefit of my readers and in my own understanding and unraveling of the Bible narrative and Law. I certainly expect it to be taken incorrectly as somehow controversial by those finding themselves in majority (mainstream) memberships to “Christian” corporate religions, each with their own anti-Biblical doctrines that support the law of man, while having no idea they are caught up in the outright lies, purposeful mistranslations, and indeed false idol worship of a very dark light or Logos (_a second God_), the form of a false idol that is without any substance, reason, or intentional purpose, simply because their chosen religion doctrinally teaches as its foundation a logical, cultural, and societal misinformation about the Bible and of the character and intent of the story of Jesus Christ in order to support the legal (anti-God) system

(Law of the land).

—=—

“Hear the word of the LORD, ye children of Israel: FOR THE LORD HATH A CONTROVERSY WITH THE INHABITANTS OF THE LAND, BECAUSE THERE IS NO TRUTH, NOR MERCY, NOR KNOWLEDGE OF GOD IN THE

LAND.”

_—Hosea 4:1, KJB_

—=—

Land, just as in the legal language, is here a reference to what is man-made, such as the law of the _land_. How do we know the law of the land is fiction? For starters, it’s invoked in the fictional constitution, where it states: “_THIS CONSTITUTION, AND THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES WHICH SHALL BE MADE IN PURSUANCE THEREOF; AND ALL TREATIES MADE, OR WHICH SHALL BE MADE, UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES, SHALL BE THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND.”_ Supreme? I thought that was God and Its Law, the Supreme Being. In other words, the United States is not of God’s Kingdom, not of God’s Nature, but a false god and system of law supreme unto itself. Need I mention this is against the Law of God? What follows is a structural breakdown that has led to everything false with modern, corporate (sole and non-profit) and national religions, especially with so-called “Christianity” in its empty name only, while at the same time attempting to wholeheartedly and Truthfully provide the Bible’s obvious intent, which is spiritually speaking beautiful and actually possible in all men (male and female). Nothing here forward cannot be verified in the Bible and its concordances and lexicons. I seek here only to reveal the Truth as is written and intended by the words of the Bible, knowing full well that _a Bible-reading people cannot be enslaved either mentally or __physically_, and thus combined with the only naturally self-evident reasoning possible. I wonder even now if anyone out there is brave enough to embrace these Truths as written, to embrace the obvious fact that only ones self is to blame and no-one else that the Law of God and therefore all moral action and defense is utterly dead in our societies as that spiritual, Biblical Law is all but defeated and wrung dry from each of our hands, minds, and actions, specifically because of the false teachings in that multitude of false doctrines and institutions that saturates nations in corporate (false) “Christianity.” We suffer from the empty, incorrect, unspiritual, unreasonable, non-Biblical worship of_ Logos_ (a second God) instead of in God (Jehovah) as a universal religion steeped in idolatry. In the shortest possible terms, this can be boiled down to one problem in one sentence: we have been tricked into worshiping the effect instead of the cause; the reaction instead of the action; the visible change instead of the indivisible permanence. As the perfect example, in what my friend and colleague Patrick Jordan (VaccineFraud.com) would call a recent BABYLONIAN NAME CHANGE (SAME PIG, DIFFERENT LIPSTICK), the website _GnosticMedia.com_ has suddenly been removed from the digital ether, and in its place, reappearing as somehow artificially re-birthed like the occult phoenix from its own ashes, we find _LogosMedia_._com_ – an almost exact mirrored site from the last one, though not surprisingly missing a few shows with “Clint Richardson” in the title. What a very predictable behavior pattern from one that is always either hiding from the Truth or attempting to morph and destroy it. But let us not terry on the past, for our query is enlightenment, not such a dark source of false light. We shall give such darkness no more power to quench its thirst, using it here only as a perfect example of the false worship of a false, selfish perception of Logos in place of God — as that which is in fact antichrist. We are here to expose the fraud and misrepresentation being put forward there and in many other venues and infiltrated churches, and even to show what might perhaps be an honest misunderstanding among us all caused by such false teachers and the priests of corporate religion, which we are warned in triplicate about throughout the scriptures to avoid. I use this particular website example only because it is par for the course we are traveling today, one that gives an exact referential of he who either purposefully or mistakenly (both being unacceptable) worships a false >Logos (i.e. logical self-conclusion) as God, and who somehow believes himself redeemed by such a simplistic and empty Babylonian name-change. We are not here to pick on anyone, but to recognize that which deceives each of us, including myself, so that we may correct our own behaviors. Is that not what the purpose of the story of Christ

is?

However, one crucially relevant point must be made here. The word _LOGOS_ to the Gnostics meant _LOGIC_. And so here again we find the logical conclusions and perceptions of man being confused with the True Logos (Law of Nature), which Exists in self-evidence despite mans devices and limited scope of perspective. And no, the Bible is not the Trivium in any way, shape, or form, and in fact warns against being blinded by the DIALECTIC (logic) of ones now limited knowledge. And so this Babylonian name change, same pig different lipstick, in actuality was no change at all, only a fleeting attempt at word magic to alter perception and for the pretended reversal of the _guilt by association_ fallacy of logic. That being said, this and all of my posted work is done in the name of Truth, of Jehovah, and therefore will always be free to all that wish to receive it as an unconditional gift. In this I seek only to fulfill the Law of Nature, of Jehovah, in perfection with the most important, legality-defeating Laws of Love and Charity. Please pass it on and reprint it freely and unconditionally if you feel the spiritual need. What is one to make of he that without awareness of his own paradoxical rhetoric and contradicting flattering title designates himself as a _Gnostic Christian_? This oxymoronic title of flattery is like saying I am a negative positive. I am a non-believing believer. I am the sum of two opposing conceptions. I am the walking, talking manifestation of a logical fallacy… And so it could be said that, if ignorance is not qualified as ever being an excuse, then there is truthfully no excuse for anyone in mastery of what Gnosticism entails to entitle himself by such an obvious oxymoron as “Christian.” Unless… Is this a purposeful deceit, a conscious lie (fiction)? For this would be the only explanation, save one other. That ones mastery was not of the Word (Law) of God, as an understanding of the scriptures, but only of ones own perspective of what God and Its doctrine (Law) Is. In other words, the gnostics worshiped their own Logic over the Reality and Truth of the Supreme and unchangeable Existence (All of Being) that is God.

Logic?

Yes, man’s individual perception of what is the Logos as a logical conclusion is the causality of the actions of most men. For God (Truth) or some false perspective of God, or even that no God Exists, is always the ultimate object behind man’s actions, which are of course based on man’s always limited, subjective logic. Yes, even, and I say especially the absence of the understanding of what Is Jehovah (Truth) by men is the root cause of all crime and fallacious logic. And so I say again, we are not merely suffering from the darkness (ignorance) of mind as to what the Bible teaches, but are instead stuck in the ancient philosophies and cold, rhetoric of those celebrated Greek logicians. We do not live by scripture, in spirituality and harmony with our God (Nature), but instead worship the names of Plutonian, philosophical arts.

—=—.

“LOGOS IS LOGICAL APPEAL, AND THE TERM LOGIC IS DERIVED FROM IT. IT IS NORMALLY USED TO DESCRIBE FACTS AND FIGURES THAT SUPPORT THE SPEAKER’S TOPIC.“ _–Aristotle’s: ‘Three Modes of Persuasion in Rhetoric’_

—=—

Is Logos therefore God? Is Jesus Christ therefore a personification of man’s limited, perception-based logical conclusions? Absolutely not! What Exists and what is logically concluded to Exist is never the same thing. Logos is often man’s practical or selfish recreation in his own mind of what God is, again the form of God without any substance. To be clear, while men cannot exist without God (Nature), Logos doesn’t effect the harmony Nature without the actions of unlawful men. The perception of what is Logos necessarily either causes men to act neutrally with Nature or against It. It is the empty name (noun) instead of the actual Existence and action of Being (verb). And what is the entirety of the legal system and false law but an appeal to logic (false logos)? What is the popes rule and the King’s kingdom but an appeal to the logical authority of Logos (the pope as a false/anti christ) over even that of Jehovah, that the pope even has the power to alter the Bible, to change the Law of God toward the corporate needs of the legal structure of the Vatican? An appeal to the highest authority of the changeable Logos is an appeal to the lack of the Highest Authority of the unchangeable Jehovah. In other words, only when men’s conception of what Logos _is_ falls out of line with that of God and the Law of Nature can men commit crimes against Nature (Jehovah) while believing they have the blessing of this replacement for God (a falsely perceived Logos), be it a pope, a king, a magistrate, or some other antichrist (replacement of Christ). To replace God with Logos (logic) is to pretend God’s Word (Law) has no source higher than man. Logic, it can be metaphorically said, does not please God (Jehovah), but only ourselves and that of other, like-minded men. Through logic crimes against God are pretended reasonable and thus made legal.

—=—

“AS WE SAID BEFORE, SO SAY I NOW AGAIN, IF ANY MAN PREACH ANY OTHER GOSPEL UNTO YOU THAN THAT YE HAVE RECEIVED, LET HIM BE ACCURSED. FOR DO I NOW PERSUADE MEN, OR GOD? OR DO I SEEK TO PLEASE MEN? FOR IF I YET PLEASED MEN, I SHOULD NOT BE THE SERVANT OF CHRIST.” _—Galatians 1:8-10, KJB_

—=—

What possible chance does man have of persuading the unchangeable universe (God) to change with his own, extremely limited logic? But isn’t that the way of nations, the way of religions, the way of the vatican… to pretend to change the unchangeable God by using only the idol of Logos inharmoniously (in false logic) against God? Is not the purpose and intent of the story of Jesus Christ as the perfection and True Light of Logos being falsely used as a weapon against Jehovah and thus against us all?

Let us see…

—=—

“WE RECOGNIZE AND ACCEPT THE AUTHORITY OF THE CHURCH AS WE DO THAT OF CHRIST HIMSELF. OUR HOLY FATHER THE POPE IS OUR DEAR SWEET CHRIST ON EARTH, AS ST. CATHERINE CALLED HIM, EVEN WHEN SHE WAS POINTING OUT WITH THE LIBERTY OF A SAINT, HOW WRONG HE WAS AT THE TIME, IN HIS CONDUCT OF TEMPORAL AFFAIRS.” _–“The Case of Father Duffy”, By Dorothy Day, excerpted from ‘The Catholic Worker’, December 1949, 1, 4._

—=—

“YOU ARE THE SWEET CHRIST ON EARTH WHO WALKS IN OUR MIDST, AND WE LOVE YOU AND FOLLOW YOU. TWENTY YEARS AGO YOU STOLE OUR HEART AND TODAY WE OFFER IT TO YOU.” I GREETED THE POPE WITH THESE WORDS JUST

BEFORE MASS…”

_–‘With the Pope in the Magliana neighborhood,’ (Nov. 8, 1998), by Father Gerard McCarthy._

—=—

“HOW GREAT THEN WAS THE SAINT’S RESPECT AND PASSIONATE LOVE FOR THE ROMAN PONTIFF… SHE SAW IN HIM “THE SWEET CHRIST ON EARTH, “TO WHOM IS OWED FILIAL LOVE AND OBEDIENCE, BECAUSE, “HE WHO WILL BE DISOBEDIENT TO CHRIST ON EARTH, WHO STANDS IN THE STEAD OF CHRIST IN HEAVEN, WILL NOT SHARE IN THE FRUIT OF THE BLOOD OF THE SON OF GOD.” AND, ANTICIPATING NOT ONLY THE TEACHING BUT THE VERY LANGUAGE OF VATICAN II, THE SAINT WROTE TO POPE URBAN VI, “MOST HOLY FATHER… KNOW THE GREAT NECESSITY THAT YOU AND THE HOLY CHURCH HAVE TO PRESERVE THIS PEOPLE (OF FLORENCE) IN OBEDIENCE AND REVERENCE TO YOUR HOLINESS, FOR HE IS THE HEAD AND PRINCIPLE OF OUR FAITH…” _–Homily by Pope Paul VI on October 1, 1970, Vatican Basilica, when Saint Catherine, Virgin, was declared a Doctor of the Universal

Church…._

—=—

“LET US TRY TO IMITATE THIS LOVE AND VENERATION FOR THE POPE. HIS DIGNITY AS VICAR OF CHRIST, AS “THE SWEET CHRIST ON EARTH,” IS A MORE THAN SUFFICIENT REASON FOR US TO FEEL WHOLEHEARTEDLY UNITED TO THE ROMAN PONTIFF, AS A CONSEQUENCE OF A GENUINE FILIAL

OBLIGATION…”

_–Homily by Bishop Javier Echevarría, Prelate of Opus Dei, at St. Eugene’s Basilica in Rome on October 10, 2002, at the final Mass of thanksgiving for the canonization of Josemaría Escrivá._

—=—

“…I PRAY TO GOD THAT WE FILIPINOS WILL HAVE ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY TO RECEIVE HIM IN OUR COUNTRY. BY THAT TIME WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO BEAT OUR OWN RECORD AND GATHER TEN MILLION PEOPLE IN ONE PLACE IN ORDER TO PRAY WITH THE SWEET CHRIST ON EARTH…” _–Man of the Twentieth Century, by Bernardo Villegas, Manila Bulletin, Sunday, 7 November 1999._

—=—

“THANK YOU, SWEET CHRIST ON EARTH, FOR THOSE WHITE HAIRS, FOR THE SUFFERING WHICH HAS MADE YOU EVEN MORE DEAR IN OUR EYES, FOR YOUR STEPS, AS SPIRITUALLY INTREPID AS PHYSICALLY TIRED,” HE SAID…” _–John Norton, for the Catholic News Service, May 18, 2000_

—=—

“I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE HOLY SEE AND TO THE ARMS OF THE CURRENT SUCCESSOR OF PETER, THE VICAR OF JESUS CHRIST, THE HOLDER OF THE KEYS TO THE KINGDOM, THE UNIVERSAL AND SUPREME PASTOR OVER ALL GOD’S PEOPLE… AND TO THE MAGISTERIUM OF BISHOPS IN UNION WITH HIM, WHO TOGETHER PROTECT AND GUARANTEE THE FAITH THROUGH THE KEYS…” _–Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the Holy See_

—=—

Now, above all else, can you see what the worship of a false Logos (false Christ/anti-Christ) has created?WTF? How many times does it repeat in the Bible to beware of men calling themselves as Christ? And just what does this title of _vicar of Christ_ mean? Do these men placed under the Roman fish-god hat really believe they are the replacement of Christ on Earth – the same place that is according to the Bible not part of God’s realm? Is the pope claiming to be the temporal Logos incarnate? VICAR OF CHRIST (_Latin:_ _VICARIUS CHRISTI_): A TITLE OF THE POPE IMPLYING HIS SUPREME AND UNIVERSAL PRIMACY, BOTH OF HONOUR AND OF JURISDICTION, OVER THE CHURCH OF CHRIST. It is founded on the words of the Divine Shepherd to ST. PETER: “Feed my lambs. . . . Feed my sheep” (John 21:16-17), BY WHICH HE CONSTITUTED THE PRINCE OF THE APOSTLES GUARDIAN OF HIS ENTIRE FLOCK IN HIS OWN PLACE, THUS MAKING HIM HIS VICAR AND FULFILLING THE PROMISE MADE in Matthew 16:18-19. IN THE COURSE OF THE AGES OTHER VICARIAL DESIGNATIONS HAVE BEEN USED FOR THE POPE, as VICAR OF ST. PETER and even VICAR OF THE APOSTOLIC SEE (Pope Gelasius, I, Ep. vi), BUT THE TITLE VICAR OF CHRIST IS MORE EXPRESSIVE OF HIS SUPREME HEADSHIP OF THE CHURCH ON EARTH, WHICH HE BEARS IN VIRTUE OF THE COMMISSION OF CHRIST AND WITH VICARIAL POWER DERIVED FROM HIM. Thus, Innocent III APPEALS FOR HIS POWER TO REMOVE BISHOPS TO THE FACT THAT HE IS VICAR OF CHRIST (cap. “_Inter corporalia_“, 2, “De trans. ep.”). HE ALSO DECLARES THAT CHRIST HAS GIVEN SUCH POWER ONLY TO HIS VICAR PETER AND HIS SUCCESSORS (cap. “_Quanto_“, 3, ibid.), and states that IT IS THE ROMAN PONTIFF WHO IS “THE SUCCESSOR OF PETER AND THE VICAR OF JESUS CHRIST“ (cap. “_Licet_“, 4, ibid.). THE TITLE VICAR OF GOD USED FOR THE POPE BY NICHOLAS III (c. “Fundamenta ejus”, 17, “De elect.”, in 6) IS EMPLOYED AS AN EQUIVALENT FOR VICAR OF CHRIST._—New Advent website encyclopedia entry. APA citation. Fanning, W. (1912). “Vicar of Christ.” In The Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved February 16, 2015 MLA citation. Fanning, William. “Vicar of Christ.” The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 15. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1912. 16 Feb. 2015_

—=—

The vicar of God and Christ (God’s Law)? The replacement for Jehovah? The stand-in Jesus Christ? Essentially, the pope is claimed to be the logic-based human form of a temporal Logos? Do Catholics actually understand this? Do non-Catholics have any idea how heretical and evil this is? And can anyone show me in the Bible where God or Jesus Christ willed, constituted, or appointed a replacement for Jesus Christ in corporate perpetuity voted on democratically by top cardinals of the Vatican corporation? How can this institution not be the WHORE OF BABYLON? But just to be sure:

—=—

“THERE IS NO OTHER HEAD OF THE CHURCH BUT THE LORD JESUS CHRIST: NOR CAN THE POPE OF ROME IN ANY SENSE BE HEAD THEREOF; BUT IS THAT ANTICHRIST, THAT MAN OF SIN AND SON OF PERDITION, THAT EXALTETH HIMSELF IN THE CHURCH AGAINST CHRIST, AND ALL THAT IS CALLED GOD.” _—Chapter XXV, article 6, of the Westminster Confession, a confessional statement issued in 1646 and important to the Presbyterian and other branches of the English-speaking Reformed

Churches_

—=—

“LET NO MAN DECEIVE YOU BY ANY MEANS: FOR THAT DAY SHALL NOT COME, EXCEPT THERE COME A FALLING AWAY FIRST, AND THAT MAN OF SIN BE REVEALED, THE SON OF PERDITION; WHO OPPOSETH AND EXALTETH HIMSELF ABOVE ALL THAT IS CALLED GOD, OR THAT IS WORSHIPPED; SO THAT HE AS GOD SITTETH IN THE TEMPLE OF GOD, SHEWING HIMSELF THAT HE IS GOD.” _—2 Thessalonians 2: 3-4, KJB_

—=—

“THE POPE HAS THE POWER TO CHANGE TIMES, TO ABROGATE LAWS, AND TO DISPENSE WITH ALL THINGS, EVEN THE PRECEPTS OF CHRIST. THE POPE HAS THE AUTHORITY AND OFTEN EXERCISED IT, TO DISPENSE WITH THE COMMAND OF

CHRIST.”

_—Decretal, de Tranlatic Episcop (The pope can modify divine law). Excerpt from Ferraris’ Ecclesiastical Dictionary_

—=—

“THE AUTHORITY OF THE CHURCH COULD THEREFORE NOT BE BOUND TO THE AUTHORITY OF THE SCRIPTURES, BECAUSE THE CHURCH HAD CHANGED THE SABBATH INTO SUNDAY, NOT BY COMMAND OF CHRIST, BUT BY IT’S OWN

AUTHORITY.”

_—Canon and Tradition, page 263_

—=—

“THE DOCTRINES OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH ARE ENTIRELY INDEPENDENT OF

HOLY SCRIPTURE.”

_—Familiar Explanation of Catholic Doctrine. Rev. M Muller, page

151_

—=—

And how many times does the Bible tell us to take no other Law (doctrines) before the the Word of God (the self-evident Truth)? Can we not see the absolute false light of what is the adversary, the antichrist, shining so darkly in its ritualistic pomp and circumstance that it may blind us from the Truth of the Real substance of the spiritual meaning of Logos? Well, why speculate when we can go to the

Source!

—=—

“NOW I BESEECH YOU, BRETHREN, MARK THEM WHICH CAUSE DIVISIONS AND

OFFENCES

CONTRARY TO THE DOCTRINE WHICH YE HAVE LEARNED; AND AVOID THEM. FOR THEY THAT ARE SUCH SERVE NOT OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST, BUT THEIR OWN

BELLY;

AND BY GOOD WORDS AND FAIR SPEECHES DECEIVE THE HEARTS OF THE SIMPLE. FOR YOUR OBEDIENCE IS COME ABROAD UNTO ALL _MEN_…“ _–Romans 16: 17-19, KJB_

—=—

“AND THEN IF ANY MAN SHALL SAY TO YOU, LO, HERE _IS_ CHRIST; OR, LO, _HE IS_ THERE; BELIEVE _HIM_ NOT: FOR FALSE CHRISTS AND FALSE PROPHETS SHALL RISE, AND SHALL SHEW SIGNS

AND WONDERS,

TO SEDUCE, IF _IT WERE_ POSSIBLE, EVEN THE ELECT.“ _–Mark 13: 21-22, KJB_

—=—

To suggest even in any minuscule amount that the Catholic doctrine and the rhetoric of its priestly deceivers is in accord with the Bible Law can only be the contemplations of a complete fool. And yet, perhaps the very heart of the problem is that we just don’t comprehend what a corporation (a legal, artificial person at law) is when we see its actors playing such dynamic, sinister roles as priests, popes, and kings, the godheads of corporations? Can we not see the difference between a false, legal temple built by words and the only True temple that is our own vessel (body)? Can we not tell the difference between the body of a man or collectively of men and an artificial person called a corporate body politic? Perhaps we just don’t realize that religions, as corporations, are necessarily headed by legally created

false gods.

—=—

“ANOTHER DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS, EITHER SOLE OR AGGREGATE, IS INTO ECCLESIASTICAL AND LAY. ECCLESIASTICAL CORPORATIONS ARE WHERE THE MEMBERS THAT COMPOSE IT ARE ENTIRELY SPIRITUAL PERSONS; SUCH AS BISHOPS; CERTAIN DEANS, AND PREBENDARIES; ALL ARCHDEACONS, PARSONS, AND VICARS; WHICH ARE SOLE CORPORATIONS; DEANS AND CHAPTERS AT PRESENT, AND FORMERLY PRIOR AND CONVENT, ABBOT AND MONKS, AND THE LIKE, BODIES AGGREGATE.” _—Sir William Blackstone_

—=—

Yes, each higher-in-status pretender in the Catholic hierarchy is indeed a corporation sole, including the office of pope. The pope is a false, legal god. For the pope is an artificial person. Don’t you see? The pope is not a man. It is not of Nature (Gods Creation) but of man’s invention. And it is certainly not in the Bible. It is Logos falsified and incorporated, the artificial light of Lucifer made fictionally manifest into a legal status. It is perception on steroids, a cancerous tumor of antichrist cells (churches) organized into and under one president of that corporate, artificial person in law, a Godhead. It is an immortal (god-like) office bestowed upon mortal (non-Christ-like) men. For no True follower of Christ would adorn such flattery of title, such pomp and circumstance as this, let alone claim such a status as to be equal to God and able to alter the

very Law of Nature!

Let’s see who else worships this dark logic-based perception of Logos… Below is a photo of the Scottish Rite Freemasonry Temple in Washington DC. In its center lies this monstrosity, a dark cube or “black stone” similar to the one enshrined in the Ka’bah at Mecca, the word Ka’bah meaning cube (square). Those masses that make pilgrimage to touch, kiss, and worship this black cube call it the “Hand of Allah”. Perhaps you’ve seen the pictures of Muslims swarming like locusts around it in Mecca? Not surprisingly, we find a similar stone cube in the DC Temple. Around the border are inscribed in mosaic stone the following words, from their own website, more Saturn and Sun worship of the false Logos of course, for _freemasonry is Judaism for the Gentiles_:

The

Scottish Rite Temple, Washington DC

The horned alter?

“At the center of the temple stands AN ALTAR OF BLACK MARBLE. Words are inscribed on the floor on all four sides – From the light of the Divine Word, the Logos, comes the wisdom of life and the goal of initiation.”

—=—

“I WILL ALSO VISIT THE ALTARS OF BETHEL: AND THE HORNS OF THE ALTAR SHALL BE CUT OFF, AND FALL TO THE GROUND…”

_–Amos 3:14, KJB_

—=—

Center alter view of the House of the Temple. THERE ARE FOUR BOOKS ON THE ALTER; THE HOLY BIBLE, THE JEWISH TORAH, THE KORAN, AND THE BHAGAVAD GITA. Bust of GEORGE WASHINGTON is located in the North garden of the Supreme Council Building. _SOURCE–>http://www.phoenixmasonry.org/masonicmuseum/sr_house_of_the_temple.htm_

—=—

“Freemasonry is not a Christian

institution,

though it has often been mistaken for such.” _–Encyclopedia Britanica, entry for Freemasonry (SECRET

ORGANIZATION)_

—=—

We may look no further than toward Alice Bailey’s brand of “Theosophy” to find its own version of the initiation process, of which it particularly calls as the “crucifixion” and “resurrection” that regards the sun worship of a “Solar

Logos:”

—=—

“JOIN THE STAFF CORPS OF THE SOLAR LOGOS

“,

I.E., JOIN THE MASTERS LIVING IN ETHERIC CITIES INSIDE THE SUN WHO SUPERVISE THE ACTIVITIES OF THE SOLAR ANGELS

THAT DIRECT THE

PROCESS OF EVOLUTION OF THE LIFE WAVES (PROCESS OF REINCARNATION) OF THE BEINGS ON ALL THE PLANETS OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM (ALL OF WHOM LIVE EXCEPT THOSE ON EARTH LIVE ON THE ETHERIC PLANES OF THEIR PLANETS)… ‘PREPARE THE WORK OF THE NEXT CHAIN

, I.E. JOIN THAT

SUBSECTION OF THE _STAFF CORPS OF THE SOLAR LOGOS _WHO ARE THE SOLAR PLANNERS WHO PLAN THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF PLANETARY CIVILIZATIONS IN THIS SOLAR SYSTEM’.“ _–https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Initiation_(Theosophy)_

—=—

But I digress from this complete insanity, from these secondary Logos replacement gods and doctrines, finding it difficult and utterly implausible to comprehend how anyone could put faith (trust) in and believe in (love) such nonsensical, non-Biblical, non-self-evident hogwash spewing from all these philosophers, organized religions, and secret societies. There is no self-evident Truth to be found here, merely empty words, the logos (logical conclusions) of veiled satanism. And yet many men (male and female) have certainly pretended to liberate themselves from the True intent of the Logos (Word of God) exemplified in Christ, specifically from what Is the foundation of the self-evident Law of Nature (Being), only to follow their own or others’ false teachings and words of logical discourse and rhetorical gobbledygook under the indoctrination of fictional (legalistic) law, alternative church cannons, and the false sciences (liberal arts). The only real secret of secret societies is the deciphering tool for their lies. Without lies there are no secrets, for nothing of God is purposefully secret, only wondrously, beautifully unknown. For a secret implies knowledge held by some and withheld from others, and only men may commit such foolishness. A man-made mystery is never the same as that of the wondrous and yet unknown mysteries of the Universe. And it is this artful speculation of the unknowable aspect of the Supreme Being that contemplates the foundation of this man-as-god Logos complex.

—=—

“YEA, YE TOOK UP THE TABERNACLE OF MOLOCH, AND THE STAR OF YOUR GOD REMPHAN, FIGURES WHICH YE MADE TO WORSHIP THEM: AND I WILL CARRY YOU AWAY BEYOND BABYLON.”

_–Acts 7:43, KJB_

—=—

“BUT YE HAVE BORNE (_CARRIED_) THE TABERNACLE OF YOUR MOLOCH AND CHIUNYOUR IMAGES, THE STAR OF YOUR GOD, WHICH YE MADE TO

YOURSELVES.“

_–Amos 5:26, KJB_

—=—

The idols of which the concept of Logos have been turned into by men are many. To bear the cross or crucifix, for instance, as a misunderstood and mistranslated symbol of torture and death, is in no way rational, nor is the image (idol) of Christ hanging upon a cross — a symbol of death and not life. It is, as I discuss in my book, also entirely non-Biblical in its worship. Christianity in organized religions has literally been tricked into worshiping death. Thus the references to Remphan and Chiun, which are “lifeless” idols (statues) put upon a pedestal and worshiped as gods – the very thing we are not to do with the allegorical Life of Jesus Christ. But most of all, the Bible warns us of worshiping and carrying that which is made by our own hands, made unto ourselves, that we make to worship. Yet this is the backbone of most supposedly “Christian” religions. _REMPHAN_ = “THE SHRUNKEN (AS LIFELESS)” (a) THE NAME OF AN IDOL WORSHIPPED SECRETLY BY THE ISRAELITES IN THE WILDERNESS; A COPTIC PR. NAME OF SATURN… BUT BY OTHERS REGARDED AS AN APPELLATIVE, SIGNIFYING ‘STAND,’ ‘PEDESTAL’ (GERMAN _GERÜST_; SO _HITZIG_), OR ‘STATUE’ _CHIUN_ = “AN IMAGE” or “PILLAR,” (a) PROBABLY A STATUE OF THE ASSYRIAN-BABYLONIAN GOD OF THE PLANET SATURN AND USED TO SYMBOLISE

ISRAELITE APOSTASY.

—=—

To worship Logos as that which spiritually does not effect Life is to worship the death of the Living God and Its Law; darkness, imagery,

idolatry.

To worship Logos as that of the Law of Life (Existence) Itself is to worship the Life of Christ by following His example. To worship merely the idol, the image of Christ while completely breaking every Law of God (Logos) on a daily basis and as a culture and religion is akin to madness, and absolutely is to spit upon the Nature (True alter) of Jehovah. But what a perfect false (second) god this is indeed as the conception of a personal, logic-based (man-made) version of Logos for the consummate logician and literalist — for he that narcissistically relishes and loves his own limited, imperfect ideals and logic-based rhetoric over that which is correctly defined as Logos in the Bible, as that Supremacy of Being that is the perfection and unchanging totality of the Permanence of Jehovah and the self-evident, self-existent Word (Law) of Nature (God) Itself! Have you not heard around the way men without conscious understanding or actualization of the Bible texts and its clearly stated Law referring to Logos as God Itself without a spiritual bone in their body? I certainly have. And by Aristotle’s philosophy on the subject of Logos above, the God of the logician is necessarily his or her own opinionated, narcissistically encircled (fractal), logical rhetoric based not on spiritual and experienced knowledge itself, but on ones vast and incalculable ignorance of all that Exists that one does not and in general cannot know (experience). To the logician, it is this blinding projection of self-granduer as “God” that is Logos, and it is therefore differing in its imaginary appearance to each man. Some men believe themselves to be popes and kings, the epitome of self-serving Logos worship, and they create their own doctrines and antichrist temples complete with anti-Nature systems of law. It is never that which is the believed-in, self-evident beauty of the mystery of the Universe (Jehovah), but instead the empty, non-spiritual anti-mystery, the non-belief of God that is hidden behind a self-perpetuated conjuration of Logos as God, a self-created secondary God that instead worships and serves the wants and desires of men despite the Law and Laws of Nature. It is this theosophical demeaning and degradation of what is all Truth into a logical model that has lead us toward a limited, psycho-social order. _What I say is God is therefore God (Truth). What is Truth (God) is what I say. God is limited only by what my logical conclusion of what God is._ Sound familiar? Unfortunately, this has become the typical disposition of the average “Christian” as this logic-based fiction further supersedes the common, Natural Reasoning of men. Meanwhile, the definitions and intent of the words of the Bible are all but ignored, remaining undeciphered and misused by the forked tongues of corporate ministers credentialed by the legal state and syndicalist education and seminary system of mammon. How about those that claim to have a personal relationship with Christ? What does this mean, exactly, to have a personal relationship with Logos? That you are friends with the Law/Word of God? Funny, because what kind of friend would follow the legal law while claiming friendship with Christ? Talk about hypocritical! The Truth is that this is an empty statement, to have a relationship with an image, an idol, instead of what that idol represents. It means nothing, being formed only in the strictest of ignorance leading to such a logical fallacy. It is to say, at best, that while I know the Law of God (Logos/Christ) personally, I don’t follow It at all. I’m friends with the Law but at the same time hate it (don’t follow it). It is to worship the Law without respecting Its Source nor following its tenets. And that spells enmity, not friendship. Nothing could be farther from the Biblical meaning and intention of this word, Logos. But then, as we are warned, even satan (the adversarial darkness of worshiped, purposeful ignorance and lies) will appear as the Light (Logos) of God. Obviously, as with many concepts and words, Logos has at the very least a deeply dualistic meaning, each containing a multitude of smaller, subjective constructs linked as subjective tails, ultimately causing a fractal structure of false logic that always folds in on itself no matter how close or deep one looks. To comprehend this infinite fractal loop I call the logic trap, one merely need see how the fractal formulation in mathamatics works on a visual (artificial) scale: Here is the perfect simulation of mans logic as antichrist. The fractal never changes, only the perceptions of whoever looks upon it. So what is the difference between this fractal simulation (fiction) and Reality (God) and Its Law (Logos)? The fractal never changes. It never harmonizes. It is not alive. It has no reaction to stimuli. But isn’t that the same as the unchanging Jehovah? No. The computer simulation of this fractal is 100% made of symbols, words, numbers, etc, all of which is man-made. There is no will, no life-force, no soul behind its unchangeableness. Jehovah is temporarily changeable by disharmony, but has the will and purpose to change back into the unchanging substance of the Universe. In other words, unlike the computer simulation (fiction), Jehovah cannot be reprogramed. The laws of mathematics can be changed, as can the language and therefore law of the fractal. A simple one number change will send the whole thing into an unrecoverable chaos. It cannot fix itself. It is manmade and therefore temporary. Finally, if I pull the power cord, the fractal disappears like a cartoon. There is no plug in the self-existence

Universe to pull.

Now let us apply Natural Reasoning of Gods Law and Laws to defeat the endless, circular, repeating logic trap as visualized here… Do not get lost amongst the in-between. Do not look for a beginning or end. Realize instead that a fractal can only appear to end where it seems to begin (empty form), but that it can only be Truly seen as having no end and no beginning

(no substance),

meaning that it is not perceivable in any totality, not comprehendible

in its infinity,

very much like the circular reasoning imbued by the mind of the

logician.

This is the false logos, the darkly unspiritual path of limitless, repetitive imagery (idolatry). This represents the antichrist mindset, as the worship of non-Reality,

of self-delusion.

It continuously searches for what does not Exist in Nature, what is not a Creation of God. What you see here is a complicated mathematical logic-set placed into

a

computer logarithm and then played out in animated (soulless) form. But the foundation of a logarithm is, of course, nothingness. An

unknown integer.

Yes, it is indeed artfully “correct” that A = B. But there is no Truth behind A or B. A and B are not self-evident Creations of God’s Nature. But most importantly, A and B are not bound by the Law of God’s

Nature.

A and B are without exception defined inventions of man. They are not

Real.

They are interchangeable pieces of art, impermanent, and not of God

(Nature), not Real.

This logic-based ideal of Logos, then, is a celebration of a dead form (art) without substance, without anima (soul). This is religion in a nutshell; a never-ending question without any possible final answer. Indeed, the question is the only answer. What is God? God IS what. Who is God? God IS who. Where is God? God IS where. Who, what, where, when, and why… The only answer can be empty names (nouns). Person. Place. Thing. Nouns are words of men, not the Word of God. Nouns are not bound by the Law of Nature. Numbers are not bound by the Law of Nature. Nothing man-made is bound by the Law of Nature, for if it was, then what is man-made would never have been forced together. What man invents, compounds, and recreates is never self-evident in

Nature.

Without the Reality and set Law of Nature there can never be True

Reason,

for there is no True, permanent Law (Logos) in what is man-made

(fiction).

Logos is not God, nor can it possibly be translated (answered) as

such.

Even the logician must admit that a second God cannot also be the totality of the First. God is Truth. Can there be a second Truth? No. Logos (Law), correctly contemplated, allows men to Live in and under

God.

To tell the Truth and act (Live) in It is to act in harmony with

Logos.

To worship Logos as God (externally) is to make a false idol of Logos. To worship Logos as God (externally) is to Live without (outside of)

Logos, not within,

and therefore to Live without respect of God and Its Law. The allegory of Jesus Christ is the only True and self-evident example

of Logos.

In other words, Jesus Christ personifies Logos (Law) perfectly. Truth (God) is never the words, contemplations, ideas, designs, or

inventions of man.

Truth (God) is that which is part of and bound under the Law of God

(Logos).

Truth (God) is and can only be Nature, the self-evident, self-existent (not man-made) Universe, as all of the substance of Creation standing (Existing) as One Supremacy of Being (verb). There is no empty, “personal” relationship to Christ (Logos

personified).

To pretend friendship or relationship with Jesus Christ is akin to a sociopath pretending that, because he or she watches a movie star on television, therefore one knows that movie star personally. Man is already born into Jehovah and a part of It, a part of Truth. This requires no belief. It is not a choice. There was never any Real option to opt out of

Nature.

There’s only harmony and disharmony of action under God (Truth) according to Logos (Law). There is only obedience or non-obedience to the Law of God. There is only Being or not Being as the example of Christ, as a son of

God.

This is Logos, not the mere vulgar belief in Logos, but Living in and Loving Under It as Law. Logos is the Law of Nature realized, actualized, experienced, and thus

known.

Logos is not the Law of Nature unrealized, unexperienced, and thus

unknown.

As the allegory of Christ, Logos (Law) does not bind men in their

actions

unless men choose to accept and manifest It thusly. This is only really a choice between Peace and War against man and God

(Nature).

Logos needs nothing of the logic or belief of men to Exist. Logos is self-evident and self-existent. Logos is the expressed Law of the Nature of the Universe (God), which is personified in the story of Jesus Christ. Therefore, Logos is to be respected and followed, not worshiped externally as Its own (secondary) God. To worship Logos in idolatry as a second God is akin to worshiping the

fractal above.

To worship Logos in idolatry is to consider the Creation and Force of

Nature

in merely logical terms, without spirit, without source. But, to worship Jehovah by acting Christ-like (in the substance of

Logos),

respecting the Law of Nature, is to bear the full armor of God

(Truth).

Logos is not an empty noun/name (person/place/or thing). Logos is an already occurring verb (action). Logos is nothing without Jehovah (Source). Jehovah would be in chaos without Logos (Law). Man is a causal effect of Jehovah (Nature). Man (part of Nature) is subject to Logos, whether he admits it or not. Logos is the Law of Nature that ensures the Design of man remains intact each generation. Logos is the self-evident, self-existent (unwritten) Law of God; glue that binds the Universe. Jehovah is the self-evident, self-existent God (Universe) that Logos

administers.

Man is at the hierarchical bottom, not the top of this spiritual

equation.

For the part is never the whole, and without the whole, the part is

useless.

Jehovah is the Whole of Existence. Man Exists as part of the Whole. Man cannot Exist as a part of the Whole without being attached, and therefore under and in harmony with the Law (Logos) of the Whole. If man disregards Logos with his own logical replacement or secondary god and fictional law, the infected part (man) will therefore eventually grow cancerous and die from its own attempted separation and growth away from the

Whole.

To remain a viable part of the Whole, every part must act according to the Law (Logos) that binds it. For this purpose, the story of Jesus Christ is told as the Way and the

Light of Logos

so that men may follow and correct societal behavior according to that

example.

This, in a nutshell, is the Bible story. The Bible story of Logos is self-evidently True. It is proven with even a casual glance at the multitude of Godless

nations,

where every warning against the breaking of God’s Law is manifest as a festuring dis-ease. Spiritually, the True Logos remains absent from men’s conscious, even as man’s invented, fictional “world” and logic-based legal systems of mammon fail. Yet the idols and false paradigms of man’s own secondary, false Logos are everywhere. Its empty image is formed upon Jewelry and art. Its worthless characakture is blazoned upon Bibles, historical works,

and essays.

Its name is chanted stoically and unspiritually in corporate churches. Its spirit is invoked like the darkest of witchcrafts through blasphemous public prayers for material possessions in mammon. Its death in crucifixion is worshiped in idolatry, symbolizing the death of Logos instead of Life. And so therefore Its Source, including all the creatures of God, suffers under the collective foot of completely corrupted societies, each battling to establish their own law and false religion over that

of Nature Itself.

We suffer from the empty belief in simulacra… copies as simulations without originals, images without any reference

to actual Source,

idols without objective connection or subjective possibility of imitation (i.e. _super_ heroes), and names and titles without any connection to the Real. And most ridiculous of all, many of us state our desires to “go back

to nature”

without any conception that this is the same as “going back to God

(Jehovah).”

We have the example, the personification of Logos that is Jesus

Christ.

And so we have all that we need to go back to (be born again in)

Nature.

For while every man is always part of Nature, one cannot ever Live _of_ (belong to) Nature without a purposeful, spiritual, unwavering self-governing adherence

to Its Law.

Unless Logos is expressed in all of our individual and collective actions exemplified by Christ, Logos will remain merely the unreachable logical fallacy of man’s limited perceptive ability. Logos, in any legal society, is a dead entity. For legality and spirituality cannot exist together, and so the law of Nature (Reality) cannot exist together with the law of fiction (legality). Their purpose is to destroy each other. Just as the lie or the simulation parasitically inhabits and mimics

the Truth,

Logic pretends to be part of God’s Law. Logos is never logic, only Truth. Truth has no logical conclusion. For logic is of men, while Truth is of self-Existence (God). To apply logic to what is already self-evidently True (God) is an excursive in pure futility, To consider Logos as the consummate (perfected) logic of men is an assault on Truth (God). Man is not God (Source). Man does not create Logos. Jehvoah is not a logical Being (verb). And Jehovah (Nature, the Universe, Existence Itself) is certainly not

a mere

summation of the logical perceptions and conclusions of men. Do not get lost in this fractal logic trap. Step out of your own mind. Experience Truth without fiction.

Find God.

It won’t be hard, for you are already a part of It. The path is given to you, personified in the allegory of Christ. The path is to follow the True (self-Existing) Logos (Law) of the One

True (Living) God.

—=—

Perhaps the reader may be confused by the modern trickery of language that separates us from contemplation of the correct use of words. Perhaps, through false indoctrination (teaching of false law) by corporate religions, Hollywood entertainers, billionaire evangelists with private jets openly worshiping mammon, and just the normalized stupidity of public education, the idea of stating that the word Nature and the word God are two separate concepts or things. This couldn’t be farther from what is Truth, and certainly no further from the intent of the word. For instance, knowing now what the word Jehovah means, as all that is self-existent, then we may easily answer the question: what is the Nature of the Universe? The question is contained in the answer. God is the Nature of the Universe. God is Nature Itself, the Creator and the Creation are one. The seed and the plant are one. The Nature of the seed is to Create the plant. The Nature of the plant is to Create more seed. This is eternal Life. Heaven. In this definition, notice the difference between the first general term and the second specific one. NATURE – _noun_ –  1. IN A GENERAL SENSE, WHATEVER IS MADE OR PRODUCED; A WORD THAT COMPREHENDS ALL THE WORKS OF GOD; THE UNIVERSE. Of a phoenix we say, there is NO SUCH THING IN _NATURE. _AND LOOK THROUGH _NATURE_ UP TO NATURES GOD. 2. BY A METONYMY OF THE EFFECT FOR THE CAUSE, _NATURE_ IS USED FOR THE AGENT, CREATOR, AUTHOR, PRODUCER OF THINGS, OR FOR THE POWERS THAT PRODUCE THEM. By the expression, trees and fossils are produced by _nature_ we mean, they are formed or produced by certain inherent powers in matter, OR WE MEAN THAT THEY ARE PRODUCED BY GOD, THE CREATOR, THE AUTHOR OF WHATEVER IS MADE OR PRODUCED. THE OPINION THAT THINGS ARE PRODUCED BY INHERENT POWERS OF MATTER, INDEPENDENT OF A SUPREME INTELLIGENT AUTHOR, IS ATHEISM. BUT GENERALLY MEN MEAN BY _NATURE_ THUS USED, THE AUTHOR OF CREATED THINGS, OR THE OPERATION OF HIS POWER… _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)_

—=—

Here is a perfect example of the purposeful degradation of verse and prose in language skills retained in the common (vulgar) mindset. While the general term once was a reference to the Creator in the Supremacy of Being as the Creation, today we are convinced that Nature is a bad thing, that it is Un-Godly and opposed to what God Is. And with this absolute deceit in meaning and intent, most men are confused into worshiping God and Logos as that which is separate from Nature, external from Its Being (Existence). In this way, Christians have been inadvertently transformed into practicing atheists under false legal and religious doctrines. _The Author of Created things_, this is Jehovah. _The operation of his power_, this is Logos.Logos is the self-Existent Law of Nature, the Law of God (Jehovah). To be of anything is to belong to it. Logos belongs to God, but is not God or a god in and of Itself. Logos should not be worshiped as a second God. And as Logos is a sameness with Jesus Christ, neither should Jesus Christ be worshiped as a God.

—=—

“All things are delivered unto me of my Father: and no man knoweth the Son, G5207

but

the Father;

neither knoweth any man the Father, save the Son, G5207 and _he_ to whomsoever the Son G5207

will

reveal _him_.”

_–Matthew 11:27, KJB_

—=—

When the modern “Christian” claims to somehow personally know Jesus Christ, such a paradoxical, irrational, puzzling statement can only be resolved and corrected through the Bible itself, for some religion has certainly tainted the Word of God from that man. You may not know the Son (Law) but by knowing the Father (Jehovah), and you may not know the father but by knowing the Son (Law of Jehovah). Remember, I’ve never met a self-proclaimed “Christian” that actually knew even what the intended definition of God (as Jehovah) is, so how could one possibly know the Son of Jehovah if one has no idea what Jehovah is even defined as or intended to mean within the Bible? This causes the flattering title of “Christian” to be a fallacious_ non sequitur_, a non-starter, for what I hope are obvious reasons at this point. The Son reveals the Father. To know the Son is to know the Father. Thus, to claim a personal relationship with Jesus Christ is akin to madness, or the result of corporate religious trickery by false doctrine, for one cannot know the Son only follow It. One does not develop intimacy with the Law (Logos), one either respects and obeys it or one does not. And by doing so, one finds not Christ (the Law personified) but a harmonious relationship with Jehovah (Nature) Itself. One’s goal is not to befriend the tool (Christ/Law) in idolatry as if that is a reasonable or possible concept except in metaphor, but to use the tool (Christ/Law) to acquire the result, to become a son of God in and of oneself. And finally, let us not disregard the intent of the first line in this verse above. If all things are given (delivered) to Christ by the Father (Jehovah), then nothing of Jesus Christ is without (outside of) or apart from or different from Jehovah. The Law of God (Logos/Christ) emanates from Jehovah and from nowhere else, and so it would be impossible to know the Son (Logos) without knowing the Source (Jehovah). Yet it is impossible to know the Father (Jehovah) without conforming and living by Its Law (Son). We can say this many different ways, but they all fold back in to meaning the same thing. We must not worship Christ as God, but we must know that Christ is the path to knowing God. Salvation lies not in Christ but through Christ, for _Jesus_ is translated as _Jehovah is salvation_. To follow the Law (Jesus Christ) is to exist self-evidently (with no legal name or title) in and as a part of Jehovah. These are not separate aspects, but again part of the whole cycle of Life in self-Existence. LOGOS IS THE EFFECT OF THE CAUSE OF THE UNIVERSE, the Universe Being that which we call as Jehovah. Logos is the Law of self-Existence, the Law of all that is True, _and there is nothing new under the sun._ It emanates not from some unknown source but from that which Creates (Causes) It on a permanent basis. Logos emanates from Jehovah. Jehovah is the permanence of Nature. The Permanence of Jehovah (the Universe) equals the self-Evident Truth that there is nothing new under the sun. Permanence implies finality, completed design. This is not to suggest a stagnant Universe, only that every change is part of the Design and under Its Law, that change is part of that Permanence that describes God. What man creates is not new, only a corruption, admixture, and compounding of what already Exists under the sun. Whatever man invents is a corruption of what God already Created. The intent of the invention reveals its reason, as good, evil, or neutral. Yet the possibility of evil intent is even more important to consider with every possible invention, even before it is designed. The earth cannot be destroyed by anything upon the earth, except man. But man cannot destroy the earth without altering its perfection of Being, in an attempt to break the Law of Nature. There are no bombs in Nature. Indeed, this corruption of perfection is the essence and intent of all modern, institutional science today, like it or not. The only difference between a modern-day “scientist” (inventor/designer) and a modern-day corporate (false) “Christian” is that while the later pretends to worship the perfection of God while ignorantly breaking every Law of God, the “scientist” studies that perfection of Nature and Its Law (Logos) in order to alter and thus purposefully, intentionally (knowingly) corrupt it, reinventing and legally (artificially) naming it as a legal fiction for profit and gain. Both are completely out of harmony with God’s Nature and Law, and some even bear both flattering titles together, _Christian_ and _scientist_! Logos is like the invisible skin or substance that holds all the form together, the force of a continuous Creation (verb). For Creation was not a singular event in man’s limited concept of history as the church and state would desire us to believe, and as is pretended by false religions. Creation is the wonder of that which is unending and without beginning or end, as what Was, what Is, and what Shall forever Be, as the timeless Being (verb) that is the continuing, never-ending, unchanging cycle of self-Existence. This is the meaning of the unchanging Universe, of Jehovah, as all that Lives and Dies and carries on the cycle of self-perpetuating Existence and thus Life Itself as one Whole, Supreme Being (Verb). Creation, in other words, happens within Jehovah at all times, with each new blade of grass and with every creature born. Jehovah is Creation, for Jehovah is the Creator. Again, these are terms of sameness. What is Creation is the result of the Creator, not separate from it, just as the Son (Law) is of the Father (Creator of Law). Creation is the never-ending cycle of Life in and of the Universe. Creation is the result of the harmonious perfection of Nature, and the form of what is Created is the Existence (substance) of Nature. God is defined as self-Existent Nature, meaning God (Truth) is the Nature of all that is Real. And God’s Logos (Law) defines what form and frequency that substance is presented as in the visible and invisible spectrum that man may perceive it in. To be clear, Man is not limited in any way by this gift of sight by God, which only allows us to see in the filtered, visible spectrum of light our eyes are designed to perceive. This miraculous sense of sight is the causal effect of the Natural application of Logos, of the Law of Nature unto the Creation of man. If one needs to believe that man evolved into this state of being and of filtered sight from some sludge or monkey, then that evolutionary process is the slow perfection of Creation and Its Design. What evolves in Nature is designed to evolve that it may Live as part of Creation. For again, what Exists as Life is nothing new under the sun. What evolves was born (Created) that way. Any debate on this is futile and fails as circular logic with no end, no winner. When knowledge is lost in this way, the adversary to Jehovah (satanism) wins, for the answer to any satanic question will always lead to the source of that question, which is nothingness. The lie cannot support itself unless it steals its perceived credibility from the Truth. We see exactly what we need to see and nothing else for our perfect survival and harmony within Nature, just as all of the Creatures in Creation are given such limitations suited to the design of their purpose in Nature (as part of Jehovah and the unending cycle of Life). Some species are even born blind, an Act of God not to be questioned but instead cherished as part of the perfection and fulfillment of the spiritual and physical Laws of Nature (Logos). It is only when our wants and our lustful desires cause us to question this perfection of Design (Logos) for our own benefit and not that of the Whole that we seek to improve on that perfection under logic-based delusions. And it is only when we consider the perfection of the Whole together, of all its systems of Existence as the Oneness of God that we may see the frail and bitter mode of our own logical conclusions and actions. In other words, he who seeks to improve upon perfection can only be considered as being of unsound mind, and his maddening, unspiritual works can only be therefore intended to dis-harmonize and make imperfect that which he logically mistakes as somehow imperfect. There is no other option when seeking to alter or redesign that which is perfect. There can be no good intention of reason in man’s inventions, for the good of the Whole is the ultimate intention, including the sacrifice of the comfort and ease of the dominate parts. The ultimate spiritual state of Being in Jehovah and under Its Law (Logos) is to know that Creation is God, that God is perfected Truth, and therefore nothing man may accomplish by his temporary alteration of Nature and the disobayence of Its Law can ever cause True, spiritual happiness, for all of man’s inventions are necessarily at odds with and in disharmony with Nature and Its Law. To worship Logos correctly then is to respect what Jehovah Is in Its entire, Natural State of Being (self-Existence), which is completely without and separated from the logic-based conclusions and resulting perceptions of the minds of men. One cannot worship Logos as anything separate from Jehovah, for Jehovah is the Source of Logos. Therefore what emanates from man, especially that which is concluded in the limitations of even his best conclusions of logic, can never be confused with being part of the actual Truth of

what Logos Is.

Remember, the author is not trying to convince the reader that a God exists. This is a circular argument. I am only trying to cause understanding that the word God as used in the Bible when referencing Nature and the Universe as a “Living God” is defined as self-existence, of self-evident Truth, of that which is not manmade. It was never meant to be the topic of debate. To deny Existence Itself is nihilistic madness, and such a disposition of vulgar belief can only come about through fallacious logic. To tell the story of the Law of God, God must be defined, not left to the imaginations of men. To tell the story of anything, that thing must be clearly defined, lest it be pure fiction. There is nothing fictional about Jehovah when properly defined. If you don’t believe in Jehovah (as defined) then you have reached the ultimate precipice of all logical fallacy. You are the fallen. And you are exactly where the evil genius (devils/attorneys) want you to be, as he that may never be able to govern himself under God’s Law, therefore requiring man’s legalistic (fictional) law to control your mind and actions. The story of Christ is one of a completely illogical man, for the Law of God is not in any way based on the logic of men. It was the money-changers that were acting logically, based on their love (belief in) money. Christ never argues using logical conclusions, only self-Evident Truths. The use of metaphor and parable, in fact, allow Christ to continuously defeat the logic-based arguments of men against God and Himself (God’s Law), which by default cannot be based on what is self-Existently True, for God is Truth. To be clear, all attacks and arguments against Christ and His teachings are logical fallacies created by men. Even the temptations handed out by the devil himself in the desert are lies and deceits based on the constructive logic of an evil genius. For instance, there are no Kings in Nature, no crowns, and no kingdoms. These are lies, which is why the devil offered these artificial things up to Christ, whom of course demurred from the temptations of such logic-based (worldly) offerings. For the _King of kings_ and_ Lord of lords_ is no King at all! As King of Kings, this translates to exactly what Christ is, the personification of the Law of God (Nature). And so it is that the Law of God is sworn by oath to be upheld by the current queen and kings (vicars of christ). And it does… just not in legal fiction, which is never of the Realm of Jehovah. And so these devils bearing the crowns of corporate kingship tempt the common class into and under their fictional systems of law (false doctrine), where Logos (the Word of God) does not apply. Here, again, the staunch and stubborn literalist will be lost amongst the spiritual maze of metaphor. For the literalist is always and by necessity a fool, as one that believes fictional things can be Real, can be of and under God’s Nature. The fool believes a king is Real (of Nature). Thus the fool is ruled by fiction, by his own literary logic, and not by God’s Law (Logos). The literalist believes history to be True, though it can never be True as written by men. Thus the literalist may never learn from the recorded events of history even as a historical expert simply because he or she cannot separate the substance of the story from the belief in the actual form of the characters, times, and places storied. History is recorded and subsequently edited by those in control to keep their control structure over the present web of logic traps, as well to ensure a future, logic-based outcome beneficial to themselves. But amongst the spiritual teachers and tribes of men that worship the Truth that is Jehovah even by any other name, history is always told as a metaphoric story designed to teach morals and values designed to prevent the logicians from taking over spiritual discourse and Law. Without a metaphoric understanding of the moral storytelling presented by the story of Christ, being the personification of the Law of God (Nature), the Bible is indeed useless. And this is unfortunately where it sits, collecting dust on the shelves and being virtually burned away from and off of school shelves. But the logical argument still persists, that one need only look around each new year to see the ever-changing landscape to prove that there is no unchanging God, only some sort of chaos without Design. That’s like saying I change because my skin tans or my hair grows. The logician measures only the surface and form, never the substance behind it. And at the same time he will use star charts and moon cycles to predict many stellar and earthly events, he will in the same sentence claim no Design Exists. And this is why the false Logos (logic) is such a perfect false God for such men, especially when the Pope claims authority to change the Word of God to suit the Vatican corporation. To believe in anything without Source is dangerous and often imbecilic. To believe in Logos without Jehovah is like acknowledging a cake’s shape and frosting but refusing to respect the chef. What came before and what comes after this particular construct of modern, calendric “time” is totally irrelevant, for Jehovah (God) is timeless and unchanging. This is to say that change is in fact part of that which is unchanging, meaning that change is the foundation of Creation, and that which is newly Created at this moment is merely part of the timeless Nature of unchanging Existence. If we consider the oceans upon Earth as permanent constructs of Nature, for instance, then the measurement of their water level from year to year is absolutely worthless to their eternal, timeless measurement as that which is part of God’s permanence. Jehovah is the timeless God (self-Existence) that is the Supremacy of Being. Therefore, there is no distinction to be made between what is perceived as Creation and what is ultimately imperceptible by mans limited brain as the Creator, for all of Creation Exists by definition as a subjective part of the Whole that is the objective Creator. Man is part of Creation, part of self-Existence. So how can Creation be, by definition, separate from the Creator? To worship God is to worship the self-Existence we are a part of, to cherish it and respect all parts of Its Nature equally as the Whole, including all its Life-forms, be that the unseen microscopic parts or the unfathomable and thus unseen mysteries of the Universe beyond our limited capability to grasp It. And here we find the answer to all of our problems upon this Earth (part of Creation). We have been deceived into worshiping a Creator that is external and not part of the Creation. We have been fooled into unreasonably believing that we may harm and destroy Nature without harming or offending God. We have been conditioned to break every Law of Nature because we believe in a false, secondary, logic-based, false god that is not Nature In and Of Itself. We believe we are not harming the Nature of the Whole by destroying Its Parts that make up that which Is Nature (God). We believe in a Creation as if it is a petri dish in the starry laboratory of an alien species. We are attempting to defeat and improve the perfection of God’s Nature (Creation) because we don’t recognize God when we see It, when we walk amongst its blades of grass, when we swim in its lakes and rivers, and when we breathe in Its air. And then we have the audacity to blame God for all our own self-imposed problems due to our lack of understanding and purposeful disrespect of the True Nature of Logos (the Law of Nature). So let us explore a bit further this dichotomy of light and darkness that has historically morphed into the many false forms of a logic-based (manmade, non-self-evident) Logos. For like any weapon, it may dualistically be used for good or evil purposes. In the legal profession, we find logical rhetoric in the form of what is called the three main appeals*: ETHOS (character, reputation, perceived credibility or PERSONA), PATHOS (IDENTITY, self-interest, emotions), and, LOGOS (LOGIC, REASON, ARGUMENT).

—=—

Yes, logic is an APPEAL, but never an absolute Truth. And yes, the anti-spiritual, antichrist aspect or dark, empty face of this false Logos is a measure of ones degree of logical thinking. And no, this is not a good thing. Logic and reason are virtually opposing concepts. Logic is an appeal to reason, not reason itself. For only what is Truth may be deciphered by natural reasoning, while only what is artificial or ultimately unknown may be summed up in totality by logic. Thus, the logic-based argument is only ever one of a legal nature, which is _just the facts_. In other words, nothing but the facts (which may be untrue) on hand, nothing of the Natural Order and Law. Only certain facts but never all True knowledge, and sometimes none at all. One may only possess the facts one has learned and stored compartmentally in the mind up until now, which tomorrow may change, be forgotten, or added to. And “facts” are not always of Truth, like that which is of mammon (false valuation). And so logic alone does not exclude the fact that there is almost certainly many other facts out there besides the ones in mental or physical possession of the logician. So a logic-based argument (false Logos) is exactly limited to what will always be such limited facts based on Truths unknown and therefore unexperienced, or of limited facts only on hand and of course absent of the consideration of that which is indeed universally unknowable, or knowable only to God. _(*see THE APPEALS: ETHOS, PATHOS, AND LOGOS – Professor Jeanne Fahnestock – http://www.otal.umd.edu/~mikej/supplements/ethoslogospathos.html

)_

How logic towards unexperienced knowledge works: If I was missing a finger, and I then tried to pass an alien check point in outer space where the alien guards knew nothing but their own logic (Logos), and those aliens mounting the counter had never seen a human subject before, what do you think they would logically do when my identification and description says I’m supposed to have 10 fingers as a human being? What happens if I don’t match my identity as Pathos (legal, fictional sameness) when presenting my supposed character (persona)? What happens when the mirror lies? I would logically be detained to ascertain my true identity, since LOGICALLY and without further presented facts a 9-fingered creature cannot be human according to all the descriptive facts at hand. To the intergalactic FEMA camps with you! Oh, and don’t worry, this is just a metaphor. The aliens won’t be here till at least next year. Logos told me.

—=—

“PERSUASION IS CLEARLY A SORT OF DEMONSTRATION, SINCE WE ARE MOST FULLY PERSUADED WHEN WE CONSIDER A THING TO HAVE BEEN DEMONSTRATED. OF THE MODES OF PERSUASION FURNISHED BY THE SPOKEN WORD THERE ARE THREE KINDS. PERSUASION IS ACHIEVED BY THE SPEAKER’S PERSONAL CHARACTER WHEN THE SPEECH IS SO SPOKEN AS TO MAKE US THINK HIM CREDIBLE. SECONDLY, PERSUASION MAY COME THROUGH THE HEARERS, WHEN THE SPEECH STIRS THEIR EMOTIONS. THIRDLY, PERSUASION IS EFFECTED THROUGH THE SPEECH ITSELF WHEN WE HAVE PROVED A TRUTH OR AN APPARENT TRUTH BY MEANS OF THE PERSUASIVE ARGUMENTS SUITABLE TO THE CASE IN QUESTION.“ _–Aristotle, “RHETORIC (Aristotle)” href=”https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetoric_(Aristotle)”>Rhetoric

,

350 BC_

—=—

“FOR ARISTOTLE, _LOGOS_ IS SOMETHING MORE REFINED THAN THE CAPACITY TO MAKE PRIVATE FEELINGS PUBLIC: IT ENABLES THE HUMAN BEING TO PERFORM AS NO OTHER ANIMAL CAN; IT MAKES IT POSSIBLE FOR HIM TO PERCEIVE AND MAKE CLEAR TO OTHERS THROUGH REASONED DISCOURSE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WHAT IS ADVANTAGEOUS AND WHAT IS HARMFUL, BETWEEN WHAT IS JUST AND WHAT IS UNJUST, AND BETWEEN WHAT IS GOOD AND WHAT IS

EVIL.”

_–Paul Anthony Rahe, Republics Ancient and Modern: The Ancien Régime in Classical Greece, University of North Carolina Press, 1994,

p. 21._

—=—

“WOMAN’S PSYCHOLOGY IS FOUNDED ON THE PRINCIPLE OF _EROS_, THE GREAT BINDER AND LOOSENER, WHEREAS FROM ANCIENT TIMES THE RULING PRINCIPLE ASCRIBED TO MAN IS _LOGOS_. THE CONCEPT OF _EROS_ COULD BE EXPRESSED IN MODERN TERMS AS PSYCHIC RELATEDNESS, AND THAT OF _LOGOS_ AS OBJECTIVE INTEREST.” _–Carl Jung, Aspects of the Feminine, Princeton University Press,

1982, p. 65._

—=—

Obviously Logos gets around! There seems to be no specifically definitive meaning to the general word logos, unlike the word for the Supreme Being, Jehovah. And so for our understanding, let’s go back and try to get just a simple, foundational meaning of this word

_Gnostic_?

GNOSTIC – _noun_ – nostic. –  The Gnostics were A SECT OF PHILOSOPHERS THAT AROSE IN THE FIRST AGES OF CHRISTIANITY, WHO PRETENDED THEY WERE THE ONLY MEN WHO HAD A TRUE KNOWLEDGE OF THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION. THEY FORMED FOR THEMSELVES A SYSTEM OF THEOLOGY, AGREEABLE TO THE PHILOSOPHY OF PYTHAGORAS AND PLATO, TO WHICH THEY ACCOMMODATED THEIR INTERPRETATIONS OF SCRIPTURE. They held that all natures, INTELLIGIBLE, INTELLECTUAL AND MATERIAL, are derived by successive emanations from the infinite fountain of deity. These emanations they called OEONS. THESE DOCTRINES WERE DERIVED FROM THE ORIENTAL PHILOSOPHY. – _adjective_ – nostic. Pertaining to the Gnostics or THEIR DOCTRINES. _(–Webster’s Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)_

—=—

Ah. Now we are getting somewhere. The Gnostic Christian has his own doctrine, one specifically defined by his own logic, which he worships as his perception of what God is. And it all comes from the Greek philosophers, or in other words, that which was BEFORE CHRIST (LOGOS). Encyclopedia Britannica online further extolls this strangely dark virtue in explanation of the words _Aeon _and_ Gnosticism_: “Aeon, also spelled Eon, (Greek: “age,” or “lifetime”), in Gnosticism and Manichaeism, ONE OF THE ORDERS OF SPIRITS, OR SPHERES OF BEING, that emanated from the Godhead and were ATTRIBUTES OF THE NATURE OF THE ABSOLUTE; an important element in the COSMOLOGY that developed around the central concept of GNOSTIC DUALISM—THE CONFLICT BETWEEN MATTER AND SPIRIT.The first aeon was said to emanate directly from the unmanifest divinity and to be charged with a divine

force. Successive

emanations of aeons were charged with successively diminished force. EACH GNOSTIC SYSTEM EXPLAINED AEONS IN ITS OWN WAY, BUT ALL CONCURRED

THAT AEONS

INCREASED IN NUMBER IN PROPORTION TO THEIR REMOTENESS FROM THE DIVINITY AND THAT LOWER AEONS SHARED PROPORTIONATELY LESS IN DIVINE ENERGY. AT A CERTAIN LEVEL OF REMOTENESS, THE POSSIBILITY OF ERROR WAS SAID TO INVADE THE ACTIVITY OF AEONS; IN MOST SYSTEMS, SUCH ERROR WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CREATION OF THE MATERIAL UNIVERSE. For many, CHRIST WAS THE MOST PERFECT AEON, WHOSE SPECIFIC FUNCTION WAS TO REDEEM THE ERROR EMBODIED IN THE MATERIAL UNIVERSE; THE HOLY SPIRIT

WAS USUALLY A

SUBORDINATE AEON. In certain systems, aeons were regarded positively as embodiments of the divine; in others, they were VIEWED NEGATIVELY AS VAST MEDIA OF TIME, SPACE, AND EXPERIENCE THROUGH WHICH THE

HUMAN SOUL

MUST

PAINFULLY PASS TO REACH ITS DIVINE ORIGIN.” LINK–> https://www.britannica.com/topic/aeon

—=—

“Gnosticism, any of various RELATED PHILOSOPHICAL AND RELIGIOUS MOVEMENTS PROMINENT IN THE GRECO-ROMAN WORLD IN THE EARLY CHRISTIAN ERA, particularly the 2nd century. The designation _gnosticism_ is A TERM OF MODERN SCHOLARSHIP. IT WAS FIRST USED BY THE ENGLISH POET AND PHILOSOPHER OF RELIGION HENRY MORE (1614–87), who applied it to the RELIGIOUS GROUPS referred to in ancient sources as _GNOSTIKOI_(Greek: “THOSE WHO HAVE _GNOSIS_, or ‘KNOWLEDGE’”). The Greek adjective _GNOSTIKOS_ (“leading to knowledge” or “pertaining to knowledge”) was FIRST USED BY PLATO TO DESCRIBE THE COGNITIVE OR INTELLECTUAL DIMENSION OF LEARNING, AS OPPOSED TO THE PRACTICAL.“ LINK–> https://www.britannica.com/topic/gnosticism

—=—

In essence, the gnostic believed that Nature is a creation of chaos. Yet the definition of Jehovah, of God, is Nature, the Universe. This stems from the misinterpretation or literal inversion of the concept of what the metaphoric word “world” represents in the Bible. The world is man’s creation, not Nature (God). In essence, the terms Gnostic and Christian cancel one another out when it comes to the intent and meaning of these words. Chris Putnam had this to say about a commenter claiming the same, mixed up title on his website. Here we see the Gnostic worship of the inversion of Logos, the darkness of ones own logical black hole:… “Gnostic-Christian” is an oxymoron BECAUSE THERE IS A CONTRADICTION WITH GNOSTICISM HOLDING THAT THE CREATOR GOD OF THE OLD TESTAMENT, YAHWEH, IS THE EVIL DEMIURGE. THE SAME GOD THAT JESUS WORSHIPED AND QUOTED AS THE FATHER. Astoundingly, this “gnostic” wants to have his cake and eat it too because HE WILL ARGUE THAT HE FOLLOWS JESUS WHILE STILL CALLING YAHWEH THE EVIL DEMIURGE. I CITED INSTANCES OF JESUS QUOTING THE OT TO NO AVAIL, HE ALWAYS TWISTS THE TEXT TO SUPPORT HIS CONCLUSION. It’s so absurd that it is hard to know where to start but this evening I found the passage that ends the discussion. When an expert in the law tried to trap Jesus he asked him for the greatest commandment: And one of them, a lawyer, asked him a question to test him. “Teacher, which is the great commandment in the Law?” And he said to him, “YOU SHALL LOVE THE LORD YOUR GOD WITH ALL YOUR HEART AND WITH ALL YOUR SOUL AND WITH ALL YOUR MIND. This is the great and first commandment. And a second is like it: You shall love your neighbor as yourself. ON THESE TWO COMMANDMENTS DEPEND ALL THE LAW AND THE PROPHETS.”(Matthew 22: 35–40

)

Jesus is quoting directly from the book of Deuteronomy. “You shall love the LORD your God with ALL your heart and with ALL your soul and with ALL your might.”(Deuteronomy 6:5

)

Where the English translation reads LORD, the Hebrew text reads יהוה Yhvh  or Yahweh. SO JESUS TAUGHT THE GREATEST COMMANDMENT IS TO LOVE YAHWEH. IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO BE A GNOSTIC AND A

CHRISTIAN.

—=—

What is left if all your heart, all your soul, and all your might is tied up in Love with Jehovah (Lord your God)? What can possibly be left to worship Logos as a second God? In other words, he who worships Christ instead of Jehovah is in idolatry, worshiping the symbol of God

as if it were God.

Well, almost correct… While Chris’s assessment of the “gnostic Christian” is right on, his mastery of the Biblical language is not up to par, which is perfectly understandable and affords a good opportunity to learn. It is correct to say that one cannot Love the Lord (Jehovah/Yahweh) without Loving Christ as Logos — as the Law of God. To follow the Law of Nature is the only way to Love Jehovah. This is a self-evident Truth. Remember though that many of the King’s translated words in English, no matter which twisted American version of a Bible you may be reading (yes, the English language came from the English kingdom), each English word may have several if not dozens of different meanings. Due diligence is to discover which intent applies to which verse. This is quite an undertaking, and one that most will never take, leaving many with an incorrect interpretation of the already interpreted word, and thus without understanding of the message. The word _Lord_ here is actually defined under Strong’s #G2962 as _kyrios, _a word carrying the meaning of the more generic form of anyone or anything in a position of master or of supremacy (sovereignty), not excluding Jehovah. These terms can cause much confusion because of course a man may also be a master over other men, such as the modern _Lords_ called kings and magistrates and judges and presidents. But this word (as used in this verse) may also refer to Jehovah (Yahweh) when only Jehovah is ones master, being the highest and only Law one follows. We must remember that much of the old law (testament) is of the Jews (fallen Israelites, those opposed to Christ, opposed to the New Testament of God’s Word), much of which is based on the law of commerce in mammon, allowing for such sins as usury and slavery. And so the jew (meaning anyone that is opposed to the New Testament Law personified by Jesus Christ) seeks to teach the goyim to follow the jew as _kyrios_ (master) in the stead of Jehovah, as that which is a god but not God, not Jehovah, for God’s Law of Nature (Truth) allows for nothing that is not of Truth (Nature). The usage (love), usury, and grocery of money and the empty flattering titles of men like “king” and “pope” and “president” are not Truth. These fictional concepts are form without substance, as all legal persons, places, and things are. Yet the word _magistrate_ also translates as the word _god_ or _Lord_ and is defined as a _god_ in many dictionaries. The president of the United States, for instance, is defined as a god (magistrate). This is nothing new or shocking, just mostly unknown to the public masses of patriotic illiterates, to all of us that worship the flag of a false god (corporation). Congress, judges, governors, and mayors are all defined as magistrates (gods), as those who hold power over another. This is how generic the word god or Lord actually is in the language itself. And this is why the term Jehovah is so singular and sacred, never able to be confused with any other form of god in its usage. The king’s translators changed most of the usage of Jehovah into the capitalized word God or LORD, while at the same time calling men by the flattering title of Lord God, so that it was nearly impossible to tell the difference, and so that the common reader of the Bible would consider and blame Jehovah as a tyrant, a murderer, and a horrible “being” by mistaking the actions of men and kings called as the translated, generic word _God_. In other words, if one replaces Jehovah with any false god (by false title), including crowned and robed men as magistrates (false judges and priests/popes), then the law of the fallen is to worship that god (Lord) in supremacy. And guess what? This perfectly explains the legal system and the reason we are all stuck within its matrix code of false law enforced by false gods and their magistracy of minions and agents! We worship not Jehovah as LORD and Law (Logos), but instead only men pretending to be Lord gods (land-lords), and thus we follow the law of men, not the Nature (Truth) of God. We follow not the Truth (the Word/Law of God), but instead the lies and legal (fictional) laws that control the artifice and legal form without substance invented by men. However, there is a way to know when the word _Lord_ can only be translated as Jehovah in the Bible, and that is only when it is written in the Bible (KJV) in all capital letters, as LORD. This changes the meaning and intent of the word to only its Highest usage. It is no longer just a flattering title of men but a higher Truth intending the Supremely of Being (self-Existence). This may help the reader in deciphering the trickery of the word _Lord_ being used as well for false gods, for evil men as antichrists, by the purposefully confusing and misleading king’s translation, the same king that calls himself a replacement (anti) god and vicar (replacement/anti) of christ. More importantly, when the term “Lord Jesus” is used in the Bible, the translation is not Jehovah Jesus but _kyrios_, and this is a purposeful translation so as not to confuse Jesus Christ as Lord with_ JEHOVAH _as_ SUPREME LORD._ _***Author’s Note: Do not pretend this purposefully skewed transliteration by the king to be an excuse not to read the Bible, his trickery and purposeful misuse of terms. This form of writing is not uncommon, and can be simply compared to the military using a cyphered code to send a message without the real meaning and terms being detected by the enemy (or common masses of illiterates). One that is illiterate is not stupid, just uninformed, uneducated. To not know a secret language is not to be dumb, just ignorant. But we have the deciphering tools available to us, the concordances and lexicons, and so no excuse can be made. Time and patience are the price of knowledge. My motto stands especially true today, that nothing worth learning and knowing is going to be easy in this life. Comprehending the True intent and meaning of the Bible, that is, overcoming all of the endless lies surrounding the Nature of God’s Law by both religions and self-serving liars, is certainly no exception._ This word LORD will never be in all-Caps unless it carries but one specific meaning, in this case the highest meaning of Jehovah (YHVH/Yahweh). And the word Christ (anointed by God) will never follow the all-caps word LORD. It cannot. Christ is not Jehovah. The part is never to be mistaken or replaced as the whole. And by the way, when the word Jehovah is used in the King James Bible at four different verses, it is also spelled in all-caps like this: JEHOVAH. In this sense, it cannot be mistaken as merely the Logos (perception) of God, as merely an empty name or title upon men like _Lord_ or _god_. It is a word that transcends any and all possible words invented by men to describe It, a word to describe the highest spiritual knowledge, and so It is held and presented in this sacred, undoubtable, Supreme fashion (ALL CAPS). There are very few examples of this Super or all-caps type of writing style in the 1611 King James Bible. They are as follows in order of appearance:

—=—

I AM THAT I AM, I AM JEHOVAH HOLINESS TO THE LORD

THE LORD THY GOD

JAH

JEHOVAH

JEHOVAH

JEHOVAH

THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS MENE, MENE, TEKEL, UPHARSIN, MENE; TEKEL; PERES:

THE LORD

JESUS

JESUS

THIS IS THE KING OF THE JEWS THE KING OF THE JEWS

JESUS

JESUS

THIS IS THE KING OF THE JEWS JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS

TO THE UNKNOWN GOD

MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF

THE EARTH

KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS

—=—

Most of these refer to Jehovah. Jesus is considered, metaphorically, as the personification of the Law of Jehovah, as a branch of the Tree (God), a part of the Whole. But the Whole (Jehovah) is never called as Jesus Christ, only as Jehovah. However, it is important to note that Jesus Christ, when speaking to the Jews in their temple, tells them

that:

—=—

“JESUS SAID UNTO THEM, VERILY, VERILY, I SAY UNTO YOU, BEFORE ABRAHAM WAS, I AM.“

_–John 8:58, KJB_

—=—

In other words, the Law of God was not born with the storied, historical advent of Jesus Christ as an allegorical character in the Bible upon the Roman (humanistic) timeline, but rather is the eternal permanence that is that Law of God. Personification. The Law of God cannot die as men do, for Nature would perish without the harmonious Law and Laws of Nature holding it all together. This requires no debate, for without Existence in the form of _intelligent_ Life this would all be pointless. Intelligence is mans downfall, though, when such information is adversarial to God (Truth), as we are witnessing today. Christ, in metaphoric conception, was born to be a testator, to pass on the Will and Testament (Word/Law) of God to men, for the Living God (Jehovah) of course cannot die, and thus cannot be a testator in death. A dead Jehovah is the end of Existence, thus the story of the allegorical Son of God delivering the will of his Father, as testator  The son is sent to die as a sacrifice to be the testator so the will and testament (Law) of God can be delivered to men, thus saving men from our own artful, adversarial devices. If the Universe dies, so too does all life, and so the Law of the Universe would pass to nothing, to no man, to no part of Creation that might consciously fulfill that Law. Again, this will be expounded on with Biblical reference in my future works. But it is important to note that this allegorical story of the son dying and being resurrected in 3 days, etc. (contract law, e.g. the “lemon law”) is prevalent in many ancient texts, and is therefore pretended to somehow diminish the Bible story. Remember, this is a book of Law, not religion. This comparison is ridiculous, of course, a theosophic attempt to cause confusion and take away from the point of the story. For the point of the story is never told by such detractors of the bible, for ignorance of the purpose must be kept. Instead, the story of Christ is compared to other myths and allegorical, moral stories so as to pretend the Bible to be a forgery or plagiarism. By that standard, most of the ancient wisdom within the Bible, which by necessity had to exist before it could be written (not after), must also be a plagiarism. The source of the bible is unarguably of men. This is not in question, nor is the age or source of the wisdom (truths) they possessed when writing the Bible. Jehovah is said to be the author of the Bible only because this metaphorically means that the men that wrote it were inspired by Jehovah, by Truth. And since Truth (Jehovah) is timeless and unchanging, the argument is mute. What I write today is not my own but of God. What I write today is only a variation of what already Is, for there is nothing new under the sun. I may word the Word of God differently, but I offer nothing new, nothing that is not of the Source and inspiration of Jehovah. For Jehovah and Its Law (Logos/Jesus Christ) is as well my root and my offspring, as what is, was, and shall be. My words are not my own, anymore than I Am my own. Before Clint, I Am. Before us all, Existence Existed. Before humans walked this earth, there was the I Am. When considered therefore as part of the Tree, the branch receives due respect in its capitalization. The point here is that before any character in the Bible Jesus Christ (the Law of God/Logos) was with us, as part of the I Am (Jehovah). Thus Jesus is said to be both the ROOT and the OFFSPRING of David in Revelation as well (Rev 22:16

). The word

David is translated to that which is “beloved,” as that which is Loved by Jehovah. And what is Love but Truth? It is not that God loves Itself, it is that God is Love. Love is not a hot date on Saturday night, but Is the essence of Being and Truth that keeps ones Nature and place in It Pure. It must be such a mental mind-screw to “religiously” take these statements literally, knowing they are paradoxical and impossible in Nature by their wording. The root, for instance, cannot also be the offspring. Faith in paradox… isn’t that modern religion in a nutshell? It amounts to faith in what cannot be Real or could have possibly Existed by the very Laws of Nature! Talk about irony! In order for the false, corporate “Christian” to believe in these verses literally, they must be convinced into believing the supernatural nature of Jesus Christ as a historical character. To be _super_ to anything is to be above it. So the literal conception of the Bible necessarily requires Jesus Christ to be considered as above Nature, or in other words, above Jehovah. Yet Christ is to be considered in the flesh and shows helplessness under Jehovah (his father) in prayer. No wonder the typical “Christian” walks around aimlessly with no viable concept or expression of the acts of the Law of God. The religion of Christianity requires the poetic nature of the Bible to be taken literal, and therefore, those “believers” must reconcile that literalness by creating in their own minds a band of historical superheroes with superhuman powers beyond God’s Design and Law of Nature, and more importantly, BEYOND THEIR OWN REACH. Again we find that religion causes the Law (Logos) to be externalized instead of internalized. It causes institutionalized ignorance through liberalization of poetry, allegory, parable, and metaphor. Religion is nothing if not a promoted confusion and purposeful ignorance of most the Word of Truth (God). For the words of men may only lead one to the form of Truth, never provide It in Its substance. Truth must be experienced and self-actualized, not merely worshiped as that which is external. Man is part of Jehovah (the Whole), and so exists as part of the Truth (God). Religion causes men to consider themselves outside of Truth, outside of Jehovah, specifically by ignoring the self-evident Truth of the Universe and man’s part in It. Concepts like heaven and hell are seen as literal places with the intent to steal away choice and replace it with irrational fear. Heaven is a choice we make and keep under the Law of God, not a place to go after physical death like every religion in the world teaches. The Bible does not teach this. The Bible gives men the Law to follow in this Existence in order to Live at all times in and subservient to Truth (God), to be in harmony with Nature (heaven) and to avoid the legal, debtor’s hell in false law. It teaches self-government, something that the legally married church and state mutually seek to hide from their subjects in order to control us and keep us under the legal law of man in national, fictional systems of debt (hell). Ironically, we are given a choice between religion (idolatry/man’s fiction) and spiritual Life in God (Reality), even as these two concepts are mixed up and thus confused to mean the same thing. These two completely different lifestyles (religion and Law) should never be confused, other than that one should follow the Law of God religiously (unwaveringly). Religion is a noun (in name only), where as to act religiously in regards to God’s Law is a verb (action), a lifestyle. And yes, this is our only Real choice. Catholic does not exist in Nature. Methodist does not Exist in Nature. Judaism does not exist in Nature. None of these are Biblical terms. What each of us calls as Law, not religion, defines our status in society or lack thereof. But only if we follow that Law without exception. For the goal and purpose of the Law of God is to keep us out of and pure (unmarked, unblemished) from and immune from the contractual obligations and performance debts of the law of men (in mammon) and its false religions (artificial persons/corporations). When words as these are considered in the flesh, no such all-caps emphasis is added. Also, remember that there are several characters with the name “Jesus” in the Bible. By adding the all-caps to the name of JESUS, there can be no mistaking the intent of the word. nowhere else do we find the word Jesus in all Caps. The “KING OF THE JEWS” is a LEGAL title placed upon Jesus by an evil man, a LEGAL title which Jesus did not accept or deny. It was forced upon his character without choice. Legal names are always written in all caps for the purposes of contracts and other legal documents for the completely opposite reason, so there is no mistake that it is a fictional character (corporation). These are the highest terms of art (artifice), the highest form of the satanic legal lie. However, these LEGAL titles do not exist in Nature (Jehovah). They are strictly fictional and have no place in Jehovah (the Universe), being strictly the inventions (recreations) of man. They are empty words, form without substance. And like the Christ has its antichrist, so too do sacred words have their own anti-sacred, cursed, anti-God terms of art. And finally, we find mixed in these all-caps words those that represent the highest of what is anti-God and antichrist. MYSTERY BABYLON, what many consider the “MOTHER” or Catholic (Universal) church, the ultimate antichrist hiding behind a religious corporation. They are capitalized as well due to their incomparableness, the Highest of the Lowest of darkness. The term MENE, MENE, TEKEL, UPHARSIN, MENE; TEKEL; PERES: is loosely translated to mean, “For all have sinned and come short of the glory of God,” from Romans 3:23. This is of course followed by the redemption of this Truth, that “Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus.” The modern Christian believes this to be a supernatural event, that they may vulgarly believe in Christ but never follow Him as the Logos (Law of God). And that’s the whole point. To believe in what is supernatural is to believe in that which is outside of Nature, that is, outside of Jehovah. It is to believe in a self-perpetuated lie, a false Logos. It is to believe that one can sin, can go against every single Law of God, and still be somehow “saved” from God’s punishment thereof. This is to use Logos in idolatry, as a very lame excuse. I can assure you this was not the intention of the authors of the Bible. As an absolute Truth, we find it in all caps. And the Bible is surely in concordance with this fact, where both God and Jesus Christ say plainly that:

—=—

“Thine habitation is in the midst of deceit; through deceit they refuse to know me, saith the LORD (JEHOVAH).” _—Jeremiah 9: 6, KJB _

—=—

“WHEREFORE BY THEIR FRUITS YE SHALL KNOW THEM. NOT EVERY ONE THAT SAITH UNTO ME, LORD, LORD, SHALL ENTER INTO THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN; BUT HE THAT DOETH THE WILL OF MY FATHER WHICH IS IN HEAVEN. MANY WILL SAY TO ME IN THAT DAY, LORD, LORD, HAVE WE NOT PROPHESIED IN THY NAME? AND IN THY NAME HAVE CAST OUT DEVILS? AND IN THY NAME DONE MANY WONDERFUL WORKS? AND THEN WILL I PROFESS UNTO THEM, I NEVER KNEW YOU: DEPART FROM ME, YE THAT WORK INIQUITY. THEREFORE WHOSOEVER HEARETH THESE SAYINGS OF MINE, AND DOETH THEM, I WILL LIKEN HIM UNTO A WISE MAN, WHICH BUILT HIS HOUSE UPON A ROCK… AND EVERY ONE THAT HEARETH THESE SAYINGS OF MINE, AND DOETH THEM NOT, SHALL BE LIKENED UNTO A FOOLISH MAN, WHICH BUILT HIS HOUSE UPON THE SAND…” _—Matthew 7: 20-24, and 26, KJB_

—=—

Simply calling Jesus Christ as ones “Lord” is useless if one is not doing the Works of following Christ, as the Law of God. What king or lord can protect any kingdom when his people have not faith and obedience in his proclaimed law? What is a “Christian” but an empty flattering title when the man bearing that title acts not according to its dictates, its doctrines, and its commandments in any way? How can that which is opposed to Christ call himself a _Christian_? The answer to that is the foundation of all organized religion. How can anyone rationally argue against this self-evident Truth? The answer is that they cannot. They must argue perceptively, logically, with naught but their own fallacious conception of what God and Logos is. They cannot argue with the Bible texts, but instead only against its intent. In other words, they can only argue from the separate, forbidden doctrines of their preferred religion, from the limited form of the narcissistic reflection of the artful logos of the self. The Bible is not a religion. Christ (the Law of God) as the True meaning of Logos is to be followed religiously in harmony with Nature. These are totally different things. He that reads and hears the words of Christ yet denies them openly is absolutely a fool. And what “Christian” do you know that isn’t a fool? I certainly have been my entire life, for I let the doctrines of “Methodism” keep me from knowing (experiencing) though my own choices and actions the Word

of God (Christ).

The term KING OF KINGS obviously represents again the absolute highest of status, and so it is unmistakable that Christ is the KING of all other Kings. In other words, the Law of God (Nature) should always be considered as higher than all other systems of man-made law and their false gods (magistrates/kings). The moral, unwritten Law should be higher than the amoral, strict written law of Rome (men). Jehovah, the Living God, is not to be considered of or _in the flesh_, and so be called so vulgarly as a king (god). Jehovah is the one and only unchanging LORD (God), and therefore such titles are redundant. But for Christ, the personification of the Law of God, this metaphoric man should certainly be the highest, that is, the Law of God which is Jesus Christ (True Logos) should be highest above all kings and all lords, meaning the Law of God must be highest above all law and all lawmakers. Capitalization always alters the intent of the word. I apologize for being repetitive, but I feel I must get this point across. It is the key to understanding everything in the Bible. Without this understanding, the Bible would be like reading Moby Dick without having any clue what a “whale” or the “sea” is. Jehovah is not a word that considers the possibility of absolute knowledge by men. Again, the part can never fully understand the whole, nor can the whole be understood by its individual parts. Jehovah is indeed a word of beautiful mystery and always will be. One cannot know God in the purely sensual, experiential perspective, only in the spiritual. Jehovah is that which is beyond the comparable, worldly senses of men. To pretend God-like knowledge (gnosis) of God is this backbone of the sophist, theosophic ideal that is the plague of all failed, logic-based societies and sects, dating back to the legalists and logicians of the pre-Christian era Chinese and Greek dynasties. And so it is important to understand here that any man claiming to know God is caught in the delusion of his own mind. For he does not know Jehovah, he only thinks he knows Logos. And the sure sign of such arrogant foolishness is the use of logic-based rhetoric to pretend mastery of the subject. To claim definitive, absolute knowledge of that which can only be known by God Itself is the definition of theosophy. To claim definitive knowledge of the fact that most of what God Is in Its Supreme Being (verb) is and must always remain unknown is the foundation of spirituality. Most of us are somewhere between these two points of referential. But even more importantly, I have come to understand that the greatest knowledge that any man may obtain in this life is the understanding that no man may ever know (have knowledge of) what does not exist. Fiction, lies, untruths… these cannot be known, for they simply aren’t Truth. The essential difference between what we call as man’s law and God’s Law or the Law of Nature, is that the Law of Nature Exists self-evidently as part of Nature. Man may never know that which is artificial (legal). Knowing (loving) and following blindly are two different states of being. For instance, the act of consummation in a marriage is called as CARNAL KNOWLEDGE, where a man and woman _know_ each other in the flesh. This is True knowledge, True experience, True relationship. It is a Real thing or action. To even compare the limitations of human knowledge to that of the Supremacy (Totality) what God Is, as the Knower, Creator, and Source of everything Real and Living in self-Existence (Nature), is to compare a speck of dirt to a planet. Truth is not that which is attained by men, but what Exists self-evidently in Nature. Men cannot Create Truth,

only choose it.

CARNAL – _adjective – _1. Pertaining to flesh; fleshly; SENSUAL; OPPOSED TO SPIRITUAL; as _carnal _pleasure. 2. Being in the natural state; UNREGENERATE. THE _CARNAL_ MIND IS ENMITY AGAINST GOD. Romans 8:7

. 3. Pertaining

to the ceremonial law; as _carnal_ ordinances. Hebrews 9:10

. 4. Lecherous;

lustful; libidinous; GIVEN TO SENSUAL INDULGENCE. CARNAL-KNOWLEDGE, SEXUAL INTERCOURSE. _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English

Language)_

—=—

Sex for for purely pleasurable intent is very different than sex for procreational intent. And so, to the legal gods, sex is considered as commerce (intercourse), which in law is and can only be considered as an inducement to contract. Yes, sexual commerce (intercourse) is only an inducement for “persons” to get married, nothing more or less. For Love is not a legal term, and cannot be by its nature (Being of God). But as we can see, the act of the flesh, the purely carnal act is legally a recognized incentive and expression of consent to the marriage contract. And so this commercial intercourse cannot be confused with anything spiritual, anything of Gods Nature, nor as a product of True Love, for all these Real things do not exist in the

legal fiction.

Commerce, or intercourse, has a much deeper meaning in this sense. It is important to understand the difference between carnal, unspiritual knowledge of the flesh, and the regenerate spiritual knowledge of Natures God. The Law is not carnal, but instead meant to lead us away from the carnal, to what is the spiritual aspect of all things. This is the difference between permanent Love of and temporary lust. It is the difference between God and mammon, between pricelessness and price (false valuation). The carnal mind is that which seeks to over-use and abuse Nature (Jehovah) to satisfy ones own wants and desires, not needs. The regenerate mind sees all of Nature (Jehovah) as a single (mono) Supreme Being. Not a thing, but the action that is all of Existence Itself. And the spiritually intended idea of Logos is as the Law or Glue that holds it all together. Christ is that Law of Nature (Logos) personified into a spiritual story of a carnal man “in the flesh.” His story would be useless to every man unless he is considered as carnally tempted by the sins of the world, of the flesh. Christ is the story of the highest possible potentiality of all men, and is thus a metaphor grasping the perfection of Logos (man’s perception of God). And so, as we will see, Christ must be considered not as a God or God Itself, but as a carnal man with all the same temptations as the rest of us. If Christ were to be considered as being born perfect or “immaculate,” then there would be no purpose to learn his story. There would be no temptation, no choices made in his perfect pre-destiny, and therefore no man might become or even feel he can ever be Christ-like in overcoming that of the flesh. And so it is important to understand that LOGOS IS NOT A SELF-EVIDENT TRUTH, NOT OF JEHOVAH (GOD/CREATION) in its intent. Logos, being mans logical or reasonable conclusion and perception as to what God Is, is therefore dependent only on man and not God to exist in the mind. This is a crucial difference that will become evermore clear in its importance soon. To be clear, Logos is what man may use to find, respect, and worship God (Jehovah). To worship Logos as a form of (exterior) God is to not possess it. To worship Logos (perception of God) instead of God (Jehovah) Itself is a carnal, selfish act. Yet what we see here is that the word Logos is indeed being substituted and made fallaciously equal with the word God (Jehovah) by those who claim such impossible, theosophic knowledge. As we progress, we will find this fallacious reasoning to be a very important piece of the modern, twisted, false doctrines causing Christianity to be such a maddening, inept puzzle for most common people. The first and most obvious problem here is that Gnosticism was and still is a separate intellectualist doctrine from what is the stand-alone and self-evident Bible, being an interpretation specifically different than that which is written therein. This, of course, breaks one of the highest Laws (doctrine) of the Bible, which is to take no other doctrine or spoken word before the Bible. Doctrine means law. But the capitalized term Word is or can be also a translation of the word _Logos_. The spiritual, unwritten Word of God (Law) is Logos. But Logos is not the fullness of God. That which emanates from some other Source is not the same as that Source to which it emanates from. Reasonably and scientifically, it obviously cannot be. Smoke from a burning tree is not the tree. Steam from a lake is not the lake. Urine of an animal is not the animal. The part is never the whole. Thus to worship the perception of the Word of God as God Itself is paramount to insanity. That is to say, to worship the Law of God without acting in It at all times is purely an act of hypocrisy. What purpose is the Word of God if no man is following its instruction, leading by its example, or acting upon its force and authority? To put it simply, Logos is at best man’s perception of God, but not God in and of Itself. Logos is metaphorically like the speck of dirt attempting to reason out what the planet is and why it exists. To worship Logos over God is intellectual nonsense based on a form of theosophic, Gnostic pretending that, throughout history, has been the entire problem with all empires built around religion. Religion is false Logos worship, not the worship of God. Light and darkness. Religion is, for all intents and purposes, the worship of form (words of men) without action or substance (the Word of God). Religion keeps men from worshiping God in Its Natural substance, replacing God with Logos. Religion is but the worship of man’s perception of God, not the worship of what is Truth. For perception is never Truth, and man cannot ever Truly know what is not in and of Itself part of the Truth (Jehovah). God (Jehovah) is Truth. Logos is… something else. But what, exactly?

_A second God…_

The answer to this question is perhaps, in these modern times filled with the false doctrines of over 1,000 different so-called “Christian” religions, the most controversial one I can think of. I am almost hesitant to continue writing this essay for fear of the group-think mentality that blinds people from the Truth, preventing us all from having _eyes to see _and_ ears to hear_. It is a bitter irony that those most steeped in a lifestyle of heresy and blasphemy from the very sacred book they pretend to cherish and hold sacred are the loudest to scream heresy and blasphemy when confronted with the Truth about that very same sacred book. Even the Bible tells us not to be fooled by the wealthy merchant class who dresses sharply and inhabits the very front rows of the corporate church buildings (built by men’s hands) to be seen in the social (carnal) realm. For they are the farthest from the spiritual Truth, and certainly farthest from the Law (Word) of God. When religion becomes a status symbol, a flattering title that becomes more important than the point of the church in gathering for worship, which is God and the Bible Law, and when such worship “services” are played out like a scripted rehearsal dinner with refreshments afterword in the “social” hall, and thus when nothing of substance lays behind the empty words of he that preaches them without knowledge (experience) and lifestyle of their Truth, then the Word (Law of Nature) is lost and hidden from us all. I can think of no preacher that lives by the Word he or she preaches. I have never met a preacher that is a Christ-like example for me to follow. And now I know why. For he that preaches the Word of God without Living by It is a false preacher, a worshiper of his own version of Logos. To worship Logos is not to worship Truth, but to worship ones own limited perception of what Truth Is. It is to make excuses why oneself is not following the Law of Nature, to justify carnal pleasures and deceits such as money and debt, as if the Law of God does not forbid all artifice in mammon. The priest consorts with and deals in the very root of all evil: money. And the priest loves that money, especially the televangelist priest-class whose only experience with reaching for God is on the $10 million private jet his foolish followers donated money for. To worship Logos in place of God is idol worship, idolatry, legal adulthood, and its purpose is literally to commit sin, crimes against Nature (God) as God’s Creation, WHILE PRETENDING THAT LOGOS WILL FORGIVE ONES CRIMES AGAINST GOD (NATURE). To worship Logos is to make an idol of the Word of God instead of following and emulating It as Law. This is in direct contradiction to the very First Commandment, to have no _gods_ before Jehovah. That includes Christ, folks. To treat Jesus Christ as a second God is to break the first and Highest Commandment of all. Logos is not God, but has been artificially fashioned into one by false “Christian” religions that no more follow Christ (the Word) than know what Christ intends and represents. Yes, JESUS CHRIST IS LOGOS. And yes, I am calling 99.99% of all self-proclaimed Christians out there, regardless of your denomination, as hypocrites. And I include myself right in the middle of you. Why? Well think about it… if someone came to you at dinner time and insisted that you call them a vegetarian, and then that “vegetarian” in name only proceeded to order a thick, juicy Ribeye steak, would you not call him a hypocrite? Would you not recognize immediately that to be a vegetarian in Truth one must follow the law of vegetarianism? What makes Christianity any different? Almost every action the typical citizenship of any nation does is against the Bible, against the Law of Nature, simply because everything is legal fiction therein. The Law of Nature does not govern fiction, lies, legalisms, and artificial things and constructs. To participate in anything legal is to break with and specifically not follow the Law of God (Truth). Fiction cannot be Truth, because fiction cannot be experienced. Likewise, Jesus Christ cannot be Truth as a story, but every man may experience what it is to Live in Truth under God’s Law of Nature and thus be Christ-like. Which one of these is self-evident to you? Can you believe in the personification of God’s Law yet not follow any part of it and still call yourself by the name of that personification? Do you now see the difference between empty worship of Logos (Christ) and becoming and thus acting Christ-like? Worship is exterior, experience is interior. The worshiper is a subject of the object worshiped, whereas the doer is the object of the subject. Logos is a concept that is either good (Light) or bad (Evil, Darkness), depending on how it is used. Christ is the Word of God personified. Christ is God’s Law in the form (perception) of a man (in the flesh). Christ is the epitome of man’s limited perception of God in our own form. But while this story of Christ as written and intended was supposed to enlighten man as the personified manifestation and teachable story of the Word of God (Logos based on Truth), as the story of a man that could be followed by all other men in a perfect example of he who lives by the Law of God’s Nature, the story of Christ has instead been turned into a false idol by so-called “Christian” religions, where men worship Logos as an alternative to God instead of realizing that the example of Christ is the Light, the way and path to God for each of us, the example of how to escape from our own carnal darkness. To worship Christ as an idol (in darkness) is to take the very substance out of Christ in worship only of the empty, hollow form (name/noun). In other words, to worship Christ as an idol of God is to never manifest the Highest power, authority, and Law of Jehovah in ones self. One can never be Christ-like if one puts the image of Christ upon a pedestal higher than ones possibility of self-expression. One cannot become a son of God if one worships the Son (Word) of God as that which is unobtainable, as an untouchable god or replacement for God. This simply was not the point of the story. One must worship the allegorical _life_, not the metaphoric _death_ of Christ. For only in life (in Nature/Jehovah) may the Word of God be manifest and fulfilled by men. What use is the Bible as the Law of Nature without being in Nature to express it within?

—=—

“THAT WHICH MAY BE KNOWN OF GOD IS _MANIFEST_ IN THEM.“ _–Romans 1:19, KJB_

—=—

God is Truth. Men may gain the knowledge of God only when men manifest (experience) the purity of Truth. To experience Truth, one must follow the Law of Truth, the Law of God (Nature/Source). Logos (the Word/Law of God) is not to be worshiped as a distant or out of reach god, an idol, or even as God (Jehovah) Itself, but as the very essence and example of how every man may manifest the Word (Law) of God in themselves and in Everything Real, which is to worship, Love and protect unconditionally and without excuse the Truth in and of all things. This can only happen if men abide by the Law of Truth (God) that causes and is the Source of all things in Existence. Remember, we may never know anything but what Is the Truth. To pretend to know a fiction, a lie, an illusion, is the entire conceptualization of Satanism (that which is adversarial to God, meaning adversarial to Truth, to Nature, to Source). So this begs a difficult question… Is Logos Truth? That’s a trick question! It’s only Truth when it is experientially followed, when any man manifests the Word of God in his own spiritual Life and in all considerations, decisions, and of course actions, and thus when all causalities are defeated by the Word (Law) of God. Logos is either an action (verb) or a name (noun). So yes, we may say that Jesus Christ as the personification of Logos is the most sincere expression of Truth, but not as a mere idol to be worshiped in name only. History, no matter how accurate, is never Truth. History is words and imaginary images manifested from those words. Only through allegorical and other fables may we ever Really express a moral Truth, FOR WHILE HISTORY IS TOLD AS A PAST RESULT ALREADY WRITTEN,A MORAL ALLEGORY OR PARABLE IS TOLD IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE A CURRENT OR FUTURE UNWRITTEN RESULT. In other words, while history is told to justify current or past actions, no matter how good or bad in perspective, moral stories are designed to avert the mistakes of history, to cause men to act morally today, without the excuses and despite the immoral actions of their forefathers before them. True worship of God and of Christ is to act the part, to follow the Law. The crucifix, for example, is not Truth. It is a form without substance because its wearer has no experience in the Truth it represents. It is an empty idol of Christ. It is a perceived torture device. It is death worship, which is worship of darkness, nothingness. The reason behind the crucifix is a deep and meaningful Truth seldom understood by even the priests of corporate religions let alone most “Christians,” who don’t even know that the word cross is a metaphor, and that as a translation of _stouros_, it means not a cross but a single pike (stake), as a legal stake (interest) in land and property of the Caesar (district). Truth is always lost to such idolatry, when the form (cross) is worshipped without knowledge (experience) of its purpose and intent (substance). Jehovah is lost to those that worship Logos in mere form without substance, as an impersonal idol. We have all been tricked into praying not to God, but to Christ, or more specifically to the idol of Christ, or to Mary, the “virgin mother” of Christ as Logos without understanding, as _second gods_. Even worse, we actually are told by evangelists that we should pray for money (mammon/artifice) to solve all our problems, as if God would possibly grant to anyone any sum of money except as a curse. No man may have True knowledge of Christ without experiencing what it is to be Christ-like. But that is not to say that men may not have false, artificial relationships with that ideal of Logos, somehow being tricked into believing Christ to be a surrogate God, even though the Bible is clear that Jesus Christ was helpless before God, praying to Jehovah (his Father) for answers and help through his carnal trials “in the flesh” so as to stay spiritually pure and True to Jehovah and Its Law. It is impossible to make this mistake of identity when the full story and intent of Logos is uncovered and understood. It becomes self-evident. Truth cannot be known without experiencing it, and yet our very self-Existence is our own experience in Truth (the Universe). We experience God (Nature, the Universe) with every breath we take and with every sip of water we ingest. Life is experience within God’s Realm. Thus all men have the capacity for Universal knowledge, even if that knowledge is unseen and logically unproven. IN this way, the unknown is known. The substance of God is apparent in its spiritual totality, even though It can never be apparent in its physical (carnal) form. No idol (form) is ever Truth (substance). And so to worship Christ in any other way than by following his actions as the personified Word/Law (Logos) of God IN NATURE is to do the opposite of True worship. In fact, this empty idolatry that has become modern, incorporated “Christianity” is to disrespect the purpose and meaning of Christ and to treat His name with false attributions of external godship. Amazingly, this means that to worship the idol of Christ without acting Christ-like is to act hypocritically as and be the adversary of Christ. To honor and respect Christ in knowledge (experience) of His example is to follow his actions in every way, which is to follow the Word (Law) of God by Living and acting in Truth at all times. To be clear, at no time does the Bible tell us to become “Christians” or join a membership corporation of “Christian” religion. To be clear, Christ never tells us to worship Him as God, but to follow him to God, that we may all become the sons of God. Indeed, it is wholly against the Law of God, the Word personified as the story of Law exemplified in Jesus Christ, to create separate doctrines (laws) from those in the Bible and to take false gods. In essence, this is the intended meaning of taking false or other gods, because there is no Real alternative to that of the God of (that Is) Nature, the Universe, self-Existence. In fact, when reason is applied, it is not possible to have Two Gods that are Existence Itself. There cannot be two Sources, two actualities and manifestations of Nature, except maybe in the science fiction of modern scientific models of abomination. To take any other God before Truth (Reality, Nature) is to live by a lie, and more importantly to live under the law (false Logos) of that lie. This includes the replacing of Jesus Christ as Jehovah (God). The argument that Christ is indeed the Whole substance of God is easily remedied by the maxims of Law, Science, and as clearly written in the Bible, all of which state in kind that THE PART IS NEVER THE WHOLE. This is again a self-evident Truth. I am not God, but _I Am_ a part of God. If I worship Logos, then I begin to believe only in what I perceive as God, not what already Is and Exists despite my perceptions. To worship the part as the whole is to replace the whole with the part. This can only be a logical fallacy, a lack of experiential and spiritual knowledge. Yet all Christian religions seem to have chosen this inverted path. This manifestation of Law is not merely some fanciful notion that can be dismissed, for no system of law can exist when its adherents are at the same time creating and following their own opposing law. To destroy a “Christian nation” one only need do exactly what we are seeing today, that is, to import peoples from other nations not “Christian,” which is to say a people with a completely different book and foundation of common law. No other action need be taken except the enforcement and normalization of such integration. No supremacy (God) can exist if another god and its law is being followed at the same time. In this way, every system of law necessarily has the same rule as the Bible, to follow no other law, or the law and indeed the God or magistrate that created it would be pointless and without authority or reason for its existence. This describes the corporate, “Christian” denominations of religion exactly, as worship without purpose, without a point. What is the point of being a “Christian” unless following the Law of God as emulated in Christ? There is none, except as a condition of social expectance and peer pressure to either be or not be an idolatrous “Christian” under some corporate title of denomination. But particularly this law of taking no other law (doctrine) applies to the Bible because It is the source of the Law (Truth) of Nature, the Law of God (Truth). In other words, as we find that Jehovah (God) is defined as all that is self-Existent, self-Evident Truth, of all that Exists in and of Nature and the Universe, the Law of God, of Nature (Existence), is and can only be the Law of Truth. In other words, it is undeniable and ultimately incontrovertible, though that doesn’t stop many in their fallacious denial of It. The Law of Nature is not a creation of man, though men certainly attempted to write it down in the allegorical tales of the Bible. But such self-evident Truths are expressed in many substantive forms, and in fact every time a man speaks of the Truth of Existence untouched by men he is speaking the Word of God (Truth). The words of men, though, are never Truth, but they can be perfectly representative of Truth. But Truth is never Created by God as a word (form without substance). Nothing in Existence, in Nature, is made of words. This may seem trivial or even obvious to some, and yet at no time in our lives do we live by this obvious, self-evident Truth. We are ruled, controlled, and defeated by the false, legal words of men, by the lies of form without substance. The Law of God is not made of or by the words of men. This is self-evident, for words are obviously formed to describe Creation (Reality, Nature), meaning that WHAT IS REAL, WHAT IS THE OBJECT OF ANY WORD, MUST EXIST BEFORE THE WORD USED TO DESCRIBE IT IS INVENTED. Words are always subjective to some object, real or imaginary. The Word of God is the subject of its Object, that is, God. Understand this, and you understand what is Jehovah (God). God is Truth. The Universe, after all, does not consist in any way of words. And this should make clear the obvious, glaring problem with worshiping Logos (the subject) as God (the object), the slave as the

master.

The Bible is said to be the “Word” of God. The translation of this capitalized word, “Word” is Law. The Bible is the Law of God, the Law of Nature, of Reality, and thus of what is the only Truth, that being all in self-Existence (God’s Creation). To the literalist, the use and deeper meaning of such metaphor is lost, and so also is the intent of the Law (Word) of God. No, this is not some collection of human-created “words” that God spoke and that men then wrote down. Nature as a Whole (God) has no written language, and certainly no mouth to speak such limited words. The Word is the Law of Nature. And Jesus Christ is the personification of the Word (Law) of Nature, the example of a man following the spiritual, Highest Law of God (Nature) despite being carnal-minded (tempted by or _in_ the flesh). This is not a reference to real flesh or skin, of course, but another metaphor for the temptations of all men. The term in the flesh simply means non-spiritual things.

—=—

“HE THAT HATH RECEIVED HIS TESTIMONY HATH SET TO HIS SEAL THAT GOD IS TRUE. FOR HE WHOM GOD HATH SENT SPEAKETH THE WORDS OF GOD: FOR GOD GIVETH NOT THE SPIRIT BY MEASURE _UNTO HIM_.” _–John 3:33-34, KJB_

—=—

To speak the words of God… this is a metaphor for speaking the Truth at all times. IT does not mean to cough up empty Bible verses that mean nothing when memorized as a required school lesson or hobby. It means BEING the Truth, Acting in the Truth, and thus Living at all times in the Truth. Jehovah is A VERB, and so to worship God (Truth) can only be to act upon and under the Law (Word) of Jehovah – to be part of the Supreme Being (verb) that is Existence (Truth). It is impossible to consider Jesus Christ as anything but the allegoric messenger of Jehovah (Yahweh), that is, if you actually read the Bible and study its terms with due diligence to their meaning and intent. Jehovah and Jesus Christ are inseparable, as the Natural bond between father and son. But are they the same? This might be the most confusing question asked in religion, but in the Bible, it is clear that no, they are not the same. Jesus is not God. Jesus is not a god. Jesus is not identified as God. The son is never the whole sum of the father, the part never the whole. This is to say that Jesus Christ is intended to be understood as the allegoric personification of the Word of God, the story of a man following the Law of God while constricted and by the same passions and desires of the flesh that every man may feel. In the story, it is only reasonable to understand that only unless the Christ character may overcome those desires that all men possess, there can be no sense of perfection that may be attained. With no barriers, no goal may be set. With no temptations, no moral choice must be made. Without the possibility of error, in other words, there is nothing to overcome. And so this story of Jesus Christ as all of man’s example under the Law of Nature would indeed be pointless and unattainable by all other men if Jesus Christ were intended to be a god or part of God. He was given many tests and temptations and he passed all these tests, just like every man will be challenged to do. Without the ability to break the Word (Law) of God, as any man disabled by being portrayed as trapped “in the flesh,” then the story of Christ would be worthless to all men, for no man would be able to attain and overcome as Christ did. Personification is extremely common in old texts, and the message of any story, be it actual history or purposeful allegory, is ruined with modern readers when that which is personified is taken literally. To believe Jesus Christ to be God is to miss the entire point of the personified life and trials of the Christos. For one cannot tell the story of Law without a relatable character acting out the part. The whole point of having a hero or mentor is to strive to become and act like that hero. Christ is the ultimate hero precisely because he is not portrayed as some Superman character with powers unattainable by other men, but because all men may become christ-like — that is, unless one believes Christ to be above Nature (supernatural) and therefore unattainable for oneself. And perhaps, in the end, it is much easier to place such supernatural status upon the Christos (Law of God), for this is a wonderfully devious excuse not to be Lawful in worship of all that Is Jehovah. The idea of a super hero or that which is supernatural (above/outside of Nature/God) cannot be applied to the allegory of Jesus Christ. Why? Because Jehovah is the Universe, Nature Itself. Thus the Son of Jehovah simply and by his very nature cannot be above Nature. This simple reasoning opens many spiritual doors and opportunities once closed by religious superhero worship of Jesus as God. For we are all bound by the rules of whatever system we are living in. The legal rules apply only to legal persons, places, and things (names/nouns). Words only. This is not super (above) Nature, but a total lack of it, or to be without Jehovah. And sadly, this is where most people today are living, trying desperately to live detached from Nature, or in other words, without God. The Bible story is that of a man, not a cow or horse. If Jesus was personified in the character of a talking horse, there would be no debate as to the literal or figurative aspect of the Bible. But to tell this spiritual story, the personification of the Son of God must be relayed in the form and character of a man. This personification methodology of moral storytelling is the foundation for much of Plato, Philo, Socrates, and other ancient authors, of course, but is also the very well known structure of fairy tales, fables, and other mythos. Disney characters, usually characterized as English speaking animals, are generally personifications of concepts told as a moral story, and, evil as Disney (a corporation) certainly has proven itself to be, some deprecating, degrading back story. Yet one can simply never reasonably and with any rational thought argue that the thing or concept displayed in personification is actually that which is personified. Disney cartoons are not history. They are not literal and should never be taken as such, no matter how much we wish that actual history was indeed as Disney corporation mandates it in its cartoons. To tell the story of how man must follow the Law of Nature, of Jehovah, as the Law (Word) of Nature, of God, the story’s character must be personified into a followable and again relatable character. Indeed, we are not meant to worship or be a fan of Jesus Christ, we are each meant to manifest his story in our own actions. We are meant to become the personification of Christ in every way, to act like him and talk like him. We are meant to follow the Word (Law) of Jehovah (Nature) through Christ’s example, for Christ is the Word personified. Many are still confused when they hear the word _nature_, considering it some pagan offense to compare God to Nature. But we speak not merely of nature in its vulgar meaning here, what some may call mother nature in feminist stylings, or as the wilderness and the law of the jungle, but use this word Nature in only its highest intent. We speak of the very nature of things, not which things are in Nature. We speak of the totality of Reality not only in Its state of Being but as one whole system of Being. What is the nature of the Universe? Is it limited to the plant and animal life on Earth or simply to the mind and logic of men? Of course not. Earth and what Exists on its surface is but an infinitesimal part of the entire Nature of the Universe as a whole. Jehovah, again, is defined as the whole of the Universe, a verb meaning all of self-Existence, the action of all Life and all that Exists, which is called the Supreme (Supremacy of) Being. Not a Being. Here Being means Existence. This does not mean a single being, like a dog or cat, but the Entirety of the action of all Being, of Existence Itself as the Oneness of all things and all “space” in between. This is the meaning of Jehovah (Yahweh). This is the Highest use of the transliterated word “God” or “LORD” in the Bible. And this is how Jesus Christ is portrayed as, the personification of the very Nature of God. Christ is the Law of the Universe personified as a man, which is to say that Christ is the example of how man should act harmoniously as part of the Universe. And yes, there should be no confusion in names, as the terms Jehovah, Yahweh, and other similar names all stem from the ancient meaning and intent of _YHVH_. The problem is not what word one uses to describe what God Is, but what intent is behind the Word. In fact, one may take comfort that any word used that expresses the Truth of Nature without the concepts of men getting in the way, is merely a partial description of Jehovah. For God is All Truth. And Truth is never found in words, only intent. Words are a tool of man’s intention, and his use of them proves his intent. A word only expresses Truth when the intent behind the word is contemplative of Truth. Thus, it is not the word that is ever True, but only that which the word expresses a representation of. The words of Christ were never tainted by lies, by that which was not an expression of Truth (God), not even when he spoke in parables, for the words of Christ were allegorically bound to the Word (Law) of God (Truth). Why? Because Christ was the personification of God’s Word (Law). And his story can be read in no other way, lest its message is completely lost. Unfortunately, this is what has happened because of false “Christian” religions and evangelism that support what the

Bible does not.

There is nothing more ridiculous than the thought that a man may call himself a “Christian” and yet do nothing in his life (actions) that is Christ-like. Yet what can one expect when there is no institution more ridiculous and insulting to the Bible and its Law and allegorical stories than modern religion? Does your church worship Jehovah or Jesus Christ? Does it replace God with Christ? Do you consider Christ untouchable, his life as a historical figure instead of an example for you to follow? Do you pray to God or to Christ? This is the difference between Logos and Jehovah (God). It is the unnatural thought that man can be God. And this is not at all the intent of the Bible. Here we come to the term belief, that is, to be a _believer_ in Jehovah or a believer in Jesus Christ. Whats the difference? Really? It’s quite simple. One must be a believer in Jesus Christ. But Jehovah as defined has no option, no choice. Jehovah is a word presented as the Whole of Existence Itself, not as something that is not part of Existence. One is never presented in the Bible with a choice to either believe or not believe in Jehovah (God). The concept of not believing in Existence, in Life Itself, is ludicrous upon its face. There is no choice involved when it comes to Jehovah. The Universe Exists. Reality Exists. Nature Exists. And thus the Law that harmonizes and keeps It all together also Exists. Belief is not a necessary requisite, for Jehovah is defined as that which is self-Evident. In other words, the assumption is that no-one is foolish enough to deny what Is. To use this word Jehovah (God) as used in the Bible is the same as calling an acorn and acorn or a tree as a tree or, as it were, the Universe as the Universe. What is Truth is God. One does not choose to not believe in the existence of Jehovah, for one is then actually declaring the man-made nihilistic belief in the non-existence of All Existence. To not believe in Jehovah (by definition) is to not believe the Universe Exists, to believe that Life doesn’t exist, including even ones own existence. This is the ridiculousness that is positively declared _atheism_ — the non-belief in the existence of Existence. Think about that for a

moment…

Atheism, while fallaciously logical on its face in comparison to false religion only, is absolutely a non sequitur (non-starter) when used of the Bible and this term and its intention of Jehovah. Yes, I perfectly understand the notion that one cannot bring oneself to believe in the Burning Bush or the man in the clouds hanging out at the pearly gates of heaven. These are allegories, parables, fictional tales told to pass on a moral story. In other words, they are all various personification of God, just like the Christos. As we will see, the Bible does not require anyone to believe in the actual existence of Jesus Christ on this Earth, but in the qualities and attributes put upon Jesus Christ in the moral story and allegorical tales thereof. To be a believer in Jesus Christ is not to imagine his existence, but to believe that that all men may attain knowledge to be placed at such a right-hand place aside God, meaning to be one in harmony with the Law of Nature, or what the Bible calls a son of God. Not _the_ Son, but a son of God. The capitalization here is important. For the Son can only manifest in men that choose to become the sons of God, to follow the Law of God, the Law of Truth, the Law of Nature. Nature Exists despite our belief as men in its Existence. Christ _exists_ only when we act the part by following Christ’s example as sons of God under the Law of Nature, the Law of self-Existence and thus self-governance. Christ is, to man, the personification and example of making the right choice. Jehovah is the causality of man and all other life in the Universe. We have no choice in this _matter_. And it is necessary here to note that no other creature (Creation) on Earth is an atheist. No other life-form does not live in Reality. No other creature chooses fiction over Reality, over Truth. In other words, though they know not the man-made word that describes what the Universe (God) is, they have no ability to deny the foundational Truth of their own Existence. This ability is only of man, and it is a curse as much as it is a blessing. For man may only gain True knowledge and wisdom through the use of such metaphor and allegory. The lessons of history are useless without the ability to empathize with its characters and learn lessons from their triumphs and mistakes, which, like the allegorical tales of Jesus Christ, only serve men when those stories are applied to ones own life and actions. This ability is what it is to be a True Believer, for to believe emptily in Christ’s historical existence without acting the part and entire purpose of that existence (as an example) of Christ is really just imbecility. And in case you didn’t know it, it is this lack of self-government under the Law of Nature expressed through the example of Christ that causes all men to be citizens of the nations, for imbeciles (a legal term) standing _non compos mentis _(not in right mind) must become wards of the state. He who does not believe in Jesus Christ by acting as Christ did under the Law of God is incapable of being self-governing. And he who does not believe in Jehovah is obviously and without question _non compos mentis_ in the eyes of the law. Jehovah is defined as all that is in self-Existence Itself, or in other words, that which is not man-made. Thus, only a complete fool would claim to not believe in the existence of God (Existence). A fool would be anyone that never bothered to look up the definition of Jehovah as intended in the Bible before saying I don’t believe in Jehovah. I was that fool for a long time. Of course, we are all publicly raised (farmed) to be fools, and for the longest time I was a non-believing fool. This does not mean that I started believing, only that I stopped not believing. There is a huge difference, actually. For it takes more effort not to believe in the Nature of Reality than it does to simply accept it for the Truth it Is. In essence, the non-believer creates his or her own anti-God, a God of nothingness, and must struggle to maintain such a ridiculous belief in the non-Existence of Existence, even without really comprehending it. Why? Because most people have never been told what the intent and meaning of the word Jehovah (YHVH) means as written in the Bible. They are introduced to the burning bush, the old man in a white robe in the clouds, or Morgan Freeman, Jim Carry, or some other comedic actor (professional liar) playing a bit part in the movies, paid millions to blaspheme God and confuse the masses. These false, purely logic-based perceptions and far-off conclusions of what God Is are what is called as _logos_ (logic) by ungodly men, worshiping form by denying substance, loving only their own image and idol even in a negative way, using the idol or image as the very excuse not to believe in that which the idol or image represents, or once did before it became _simulacrum_. The conceptualization of all these pretended personifications of God (the Universe) so used to tell moral stories (or Hollywood comedies) turns out to be what people don’t believe in, and understandably so. They are confusing art with Nature, mistaking limited, logical conclusions with self-evident, self-Existent Truth. In other words, they are perceiving only the persona (mask) of Jehovah but not the Reality. In this way, we throw the baby out with the bathwater. We are lost to the True meaning of Jehovah because we may find all other personifications too ridiculous to believe in. We can thank both the secular, corporate church and the state (education, entertainment, legality) for this confusion. But to be clear, when the atheist, in his ignorance of the meaning of the word God, states with arrogant confidence that God does not exist, what he is really stating is that the Universe does’t exist, including the man pretending atheism. He is stating unwittingly that existence doesn’t exist. This misconception is defined as logos (logic), good or bad. Meanwhile, those who can be convinced to believe in this false art form of logos (logic), in form without substance as Logos, have been tricked into flat out idol worship in open satanism (adversarial-ness to God and Gods Law). The satanist (adversaries of Nature) and unlearned followers and nihilists thereof will always twist and reverse what is Truth, making the darkness appear as the light, the lie as truth, and God as the devil. I still cannot say why this is the case, nor what is the desired result? Is the concept of the devil, the evil genius necessary? Can good be experienced without trial, without temptation, without devil’s advocates? Is this exactly what the legal system is, a test, a maze consisting of the legalization of everything

antichrist?

But the real lesson for almost everyone calling themselves with any flattery of title relating to the story of Jesus Christ, as a false, self-proclaimed “Christian,” is this:

—=—

“Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: NO MAN COMETH UNTO THE FATHER, BUT BY ME. IF YE HAD KNOWN ME, YE SHOULD HAVE KNOWN MY FATHER ALSO: and from henceforth ye know him, and have seen him… BELIEVEST THOU NOT THAT I AM IN THE FATHER, AND THE FATHER IN ME? THE WORDS THAT I SPEAK UNTO YOU I SPEAK NOT OF MYSELF: BUT THE FATHER THAT DWELLETH IN ME, HE DOETH THE WORKS. Believe me that I _am_ in the Father, and the Father in me: or else believe me for the very works’ sake. Verily, verily, I say unto you, HE THAT BELIEVETH ON ME, THE WORKS THAT I DO SHALL HE DO ALSO; AND GREATER _WORKS_ THAN THESE SHALL HE DO; BECAUSE I GO UNTO MY FATHER. And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, THAT THE FATHER MAY BE GLORIFIED IN THE SON. If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do _it_. IF YE LOVE ME, KEEP MY COMMANDMENTS.“ _–John 14: 6-7, 10-15, KJB_

—=—

To be clear, one is not a son of God because one calls oneself by the flattering title of a “Christian” or because one follows some doctrinal nonsense or prayer at any of the 1000’s of denominated “Christian” corporations called churches and religions. There is a spiritual Logos (of God) and an artificial logos (man-made). One is a son of God only when one acts the part of and in line with the Supreme Being (verb), keeping the Law (commandments) of God in respect of All Being (verb). These are not the commandments of Christ, for Christ speaks only the words (Word/Law) of Jehovah (His Father) as a messenger (testator). Christ is not a lawmaker, but a law follower, as a shining example of what all men should aspire to become. And by the way, yes, there are (at least) two versions of the “Genesis” or beginning story in the Bible, and not only in _Genesis_ (the Book of Moses), but also in John, which is where falsely transliterated Logos-as-God worship apparently stems: “MODIFYING THE FIRST VERSE OF THE BOOK OF GENESIS, JOHN BEGAN THE PROLOGUE OF HIS GOSPEL WITH THE WORDS: ‘IN THE BEGINNING WAS THE LOGOS.’… Logos means both reason and word — a reason which is creative and capable ofSELF-COMMUNICATION, precisely AS REASON. JOHN THUS SPOKE THE FINAL WORD ON THE BIBLICAL CONCEPT OF GOD, AND IN THIS WORD ALL THE OFTEN TOILSOME AND TORTUOUS THREADS OF BIBLICAL FAITH FIND THEIR CULMINATION AND SYNTHESIS. IN THE BEGINNING WAS THE LOGOS, AND THE LOGOS IS GOD, SAYS THE EVANGELIST.”…THE VIEW OF A DEITY AS ‘LOGOS’ IS NOT LIMITED TO THE JUDEO-CHRISTIAN TRADITION. THE ZOROASTRIAN ANGEL ASHA: TRUTH AND ORDER, IS A PHILOSOPHICAL COUNTERPART TO ‘LOGOS.’ In the ZOROASTRIAN tradition, Asha is THE OPPOSITE OF CHAOS, defined by Zoroastrian teachings as Druj: LIE AND DISORDER. IN GREEK MYTHOLOGY, CHAOS WAS THAT WHICH EXISTED BEFORE THE GODS BEGAN TO PLAY OUT THEIR STORIES… Secularists will immediately point to the worship of Logos as a contradiction. YET IF LOGOS IS NOT A DEITY, MAN COULD CONVINCE HIMSELF HE POSSESSES REASON IN ITS ENTIRETY RATHER THAN REASON BEING AN ASPIRATION WHICH, LIKE INFINITY, ONE NEVER REACHES. ONE MIGHT THEN LOGICALLY PRESUME THAT ALL HUMANS CAN TODAY BE REASONED WITH– a common and fatal mistake when considering responses to Islam. ANOTHER DANGEROUS CONCLUSION COMES WHEN THE BELIEF THAT HUMANS CAN POSSESS REASON IN ITS ENTIRETY IS COMBINED FROM THE BELIEF THAT “SCIENTIFIC SOCIALISM” IS

THE PINNACLE

OF HUMAN

ACHIEVEMENT. The last century is piled high with the bodies of those slain by such ATHEIST REGIMES led

by

those who call themselves

“conscious”

.

Based on their so-called ‘consciousness’

THEY SOUGHT

TO TRANSFORM THE NATURE  OF WHAT THEY DEEMED TO BE THE ‘UNCONSCIOUS’ MASS OF HUMANITY. Trying to

create

socialist

man

, Mao

Zedong  killed between 40-80 million. Estimates of Joseph Stalin’s death toll range as high as 20-60 million.  Trying to control the most fundamental element of human nature, the Chinese one-baby policy

has

so far resulted in the death

of

as many as 50 million Chinese baby girls

.”

_–B.D. Alexander essey, from  Benedict’s September 12, 2006 Regensburg speech, as quoted from International Standard Bible Encyclopedia Online _

—=—

It is important to put forward here that spiritual thought and logical thought are like oil and water. Logic (as in mathematics, for instance) must by definition completely negate all extraneous possibilities in order to create a positively forwarded dialectic (thesis). You will never meet a spiritually driven mathematician, for math is an exact science. Math is a fractal created of itself. It is never wrong and can be measured to nothing by a moral relation. Math is cold and dead, having nothing to do with the actual substance of Existence except to describe it by empty formulations. Usefulness is not sacredness, unless that use is kept secret by those seeking to rule over others through false mysteries. To hold geometry as sacred is akin to a kindergarten student holding his ABC’s as sacred, a perspective based fallacious logic confused with spiritual contemplation and understanding of the Real, of Nature, of _God_. We must consider that logic is always, without exception, subjective to some other device, and is never a self-Existent object in and of itself. Thus logic is never a sure foundation for anything, ever, for logic may only be produced by the perspective of viewing what is either sure or artful. Logic is never the origin of anything, except perhaps fools. A subject (logical conclusion) cannot by definition be higher than its object Reality/artifice). THESIS – _noun_ –  1. A POSITION OR PROPOSITION WHICH A PERSON ADVANCES AND OFFERS TO MAINTAIN, OR WHICH IS ACTUALLY MAINTAINED BY ARGUMENT; a theme; A SUBJECT. 2. IN LOGIC, EVERY PROPOSITION MAY BE DIVIDED INTO _THESIS_ AND HYPOTHESIS. _THESIS_ CONTAINS THE THING AFFIRMED OR DENIED, AND HYPOTHESIS THE CONDITIONS OF THE AFFIRMATION OR NEGATION. _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the English Language)_ AFFIRM – _verb transitive_ – afferm’  1. TO ASSERT POSITIVELY; TO TELL WITH CONFIDENCE; to aver; TO DECLARE THE EXISTENCE OF SOMETHING; TO MAINTAIN AS TRUE; OPPOSED TO DENY. Of one Jesus whom Paul affirmed to be alive. Acts 25:19

. 2. To make

firm; TO ESTABLISH, CONFIRM OR RATIFY; as, the Supreme court affirmed the judgment. – _verb intransitive_ – To declare solemnly before a court or magistrate, for CONFIRMING A FACT, or TO HAVE AN AFFIRMATION ADMINISTERED TO, BY WAY OF CONFIRMATION, OR AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR AN OATH; as, the witness affirmed to the fact, or he was affirmed to the fact. _(–Webster’s 1828 Dictionary of the

English Language)_

—=—

Pay close attention here… to affirm (confirm or ratify) is considered a substitution for an oath. Many United States citizenships, especially in the alternative “movements” which never move, are convinced that they have never taken an oath or pledge to the United States. And directly speaking, this is a statement of at best ignorant, fallacious logical conclusion. But successful organized crime doesn’t ever find success in the direct method, in honesty and integrity and transparency. No, the government mob uses indirect tactics that, by their own “principals” of law (a thieves code for pirates in the human capital management trade), allow indirect affirmation (confirmation) to substitute for a direct oath. In other words, the oath is assumed and presumed to be indirectly intended as standing when any man uses the status (person, protections, titles, credit) of the nation. The indirect application of affirmation by usage of property (legal rights) is just as valid as a direct oath. And, as it turns out, the devil works this way too. For the corporate “Christian” acting in legal (antichrist) citizenship to a nation AFFIRMS the devils anti-God contract law every day, every hour, every minute, despite his or her flattering title. The user of legal things and codes cannot at the same time claim God or Logos (Gods Law) to be

on his side.

Why are the logicians of old referred to as legalists? Because the whole legal system is the POSITIVE DECLARATION OF MEN, A CONFIDENCE SCHEME, AFFIRMED TO EXIST AND BE FICTIONALLY “TRUE.” The constitution ESTABLISHES and ordains the Union of States in compact. Now, do you remember from Volume 1 that I told you not to move on until you understood perfectly the words _confirmation_ and _ratification_? This is exactly why. To establish lies as facts those lies (facts) must be ratified and confirmed, just as you must ratify and confirm the “fact” that you are acting (in agency) as the legal name (STRAWMAN) for it to have function and authority in law over you (as surety). You see, the person you use in commerce is a theses, and its hypothesis is every contract, signature, number, name, mark, and other sign you have affirmed by usage. In other words, every time you act in positive law as a person (status) of the United States you are expressing consent and confirmation to the law of that person. The contract makes the law and the creator of the person controls it, not you. Like the most mechanically impossible equation in mathematics, with this understanding of logic (as legalism) you should finally be able to see the answer, to develop the antithesis to this fractal, logical trap of personhood. Once you confirm anything (money, name, number, sign, debt, identity, etc.) through affirmation you have done the opposite of denial. Remember, Gods realm is the negative, the I Am that I Am, which means I am no person, place, or thing (nouns). To affirm is to put confidence in the positive (additional) things man invents, to acknowledge their false existence as a prima facie fact. This is “volunteerism” in legalese. Not how you or I define it, for that doesn’t matter or have relevance or even standing in court. It only matters what their definitions of words are because it is their system, not yours or mine, just like the cartoon world has its own rules bound only by what the artist imagines. We watch cartoons and cartoon characters and then we turn t

Report this ad