Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
More Annotations
A complete backup of africabizinfo.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of maquinariaspesadas.org
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of xn--quesignificasoarcon-83b.blogspot.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of funkyphotobooth.co.za
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Favourite Annotations
A complete backup of https://regexcrossword.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://cceasternwa.org
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://sonjabakker.nl
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://pepture.co
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://logoarena.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://healthmediran.ir
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://hairloss.org
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://bscbru.be
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://openanesthesia.org
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://sportsflagsandpennants.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://000webhost.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Text
ETHICAL OVERSIGHT
Ethical oversight. Ethical oversight should include, but is not limited to, policies on consent to publication, publication on vulnerable populations, ethical conduct of research using animals, ethical conduct of research using human subjects, handlingconfidential data
SEARCH RESULTS
COPE has many resources to assist publishers and editors in making decisions about ethical issues in publication, including guidelines, Allegations of misconduct. Authorship and contributorship. Complaints and appeals. Conflicts of interest / Competing interests. Journal management. Post-publication discussions and corrections. View webversion.
ETHICAL GUIDELINES FOR PEER REVIEWERS (ENGLISH) Guidance Search through our collection of resources which make up all guidance issued by COPE. Expand Guidance sub-menu. Find guidance; Flowcharts; Guidelines; Cases; Member resources COPE offers a wide range of member-only benefits and services. Expand Member resources sub-menu. COPE Forum; eLearning; About COPE Become a member, find an existing member, or read more about SEARCH RESULTSGUIDELINES Ethical guidelines for peer reviewers (English) Peer review in all its forms plays an important role in ensuring the integrity of the scholarly record. The process depends to a large extent on trust, and requires that everyone involved behaves responsibly and ethically. Peer reviewers play a central and critical part in the peer-reviewprocess
SEARCH RESULTS FOR '' Guidance Search through our collection of resources which make up all guidance issued by COPE. Expand Guidance sub-menu. Find guidance; Flowcharts; Guidelines; Cases; Member resources COPE offers a wide range of member-only benefits and services. Expand Member resources sub-menu. COPE Forum; eLearning; About COPE Become a member, find an existing member, or read more about COPE AUTHORSHIP AND CONTRIBUTORSHIP Ethical considerations around book publishing. Periodically, COPE gets requests for the development of discussion documents, guidance and flowcharts on publication ethics issues related to book publishing. Many of our members publish both journals and books, and a number of these members reference COPE guidance on journal publishing and ethicsALL FLOWCHARTS
COPE Flowcharts. COPE flowcharts offer a step by step process, for practical use on handling different aspects of publication ethics issues. For ease of use, we have combined all of COPE's flowcharts into one downloadable PDF which includes the flowcharts listed below. PLAGIARISM | COPE: COMMITTEE ON PUBLICATION ETHICS Advice: COPE was advised that the paper has been rejected. The editor wrote to each of the six authors threatening them with being reported to the dean if their explanations were unsatisfactory. The editor received five replies with four different excuses. The editor was advised to write to the dean of the medical school and include theauthors
POTENTIAL PAPER MILLS Potential “paper mills” and what to do about them – a publisher’s perspective. A recent COPE forum discussion focused on the significant problem of “paper mills”. This term describes the process by which manufactured manuscripts are submitted to a journal for a fee on behalf of researchers with the purpose of providing an easy publication for them, or to offer authorship for sale. PROMOTING INTEGRITY IN SCHOLARLY RESEARCH AND ITSFIND GUIDANCEFLOWCHARTSGUIDELINESCASESCOPE FORUMELEARNING Core practices are the policies and practices journals and publishers need, to reach the highest standards in publication ethics. We include cases with advice, guidance for day-to-day practice, education modules and events on topical issues, to support journals and publishers fulfil their policies.ETHICAL OVERSIGHT
Ethical oversight. Ethical oversight should include, but is not limited to, policies on consent to publication, publication on vulnerable populations, ethical conduct of research using animals, ethical conduct of research using human subjects, handlingconfidential data
SEARCH RESULTS
COPE has many resources to assist publishers and editors in making decisions about ethical issues in publication, including guidelines, Allegations of misconduct. Authorship and contributorship. Complaints and appeals. Conflicts of interest / Competing interests. Journal management. Post-publication discussions and corrections. View webversion.
ETHICAL GUIDELINES FOR PEER REVIEWERS (ENGLISH) Guidance Search through our collection of resources which make up all guidance issued by COPE. Expand Guidance sub-menu. Find guidance; Flowcharts; Guidelines; Cases; Member resources COPE offers a wide range of member-only benefits and services. Expand Member resources sub-menu. COPE Forum; eLearning; About COPE Become a member, find an existing member, or read more about SEARCH RESULTSGUIDELINES Ethical guidelines for peer reviewers (English) Peer review in all its forms plays an important role in ensuring the integrity of the scholarly record. The process depends to a large extent on trust, and requires that everyone involved behaves responsibly and ethically. Peer reviewers play a central and critical part in the peer-reviewprocess
SEARCH RESULTS FOR '' Guidance Search through our collection of resources which make up all guidance issued by COPE. Expand Guidance sub-menu. Find guidance; Flowcharts; Guidelines; Cases; Member resources COPE offers a wide range of member-only benefits and services. Expand Member resources sub-menu. COPE Forum; eLearning; About COPE Become a member, find an existing member, or read more about COPE AUTHORSHIP AND CONTRIBUTORSHIP Ethical considerations around book publishing. Periodically, COPE gets requests for the development of discussion documents, guidance and flowcharts on publication ethics issues related to book publishing. Many of our members publish both journals and books, and a number of these members reference COPE guidance on journal publishing and ethicsALL FLOWCHARTS
COPE Flowcharts. COPE flowcharts offer a step by step process, for practical use on handling different aspects of publication ethics issues. For ease of use, we have combined all of COPE's flowcharts into one downloadable PDF which includes the flowcharts listed below. PLAGIARISM | COPE: COMMITTEE ON PUBLICATION ETHICS Advice: COPE was advised that the paper has been rejected. The editor wrote to each of the six authors threatening them with being reported to the dean if their explanations were unsatisfactory. The editor received five replies with four different excuses. The editor was advised to write to the dean of the medical school and include theauthors
POTENTIAL PAPER MILLS Potential “paper mills” and what to do about them – a publisher’s perspective. A recent COPE forum discussion focused on the significant problem of “paper mills”. This term describes the process by which manufactured manuscripts are submitted to a journal for a fee on behalf of researchers with the purpose of providing an easy publication for them, or to offer authorship for sale.SEARCH RESULTS
COPE has many resources to assist publishers and editors in making decisions about ethical issues in publication, including guidelines, Allegations of misconduct. Authorship and contributorship. Complaints and appeals. Conflicts of interest / Competing interests. Journal management. Post-publication discussions and corrections. View webversion.
SEARCH RESULTS FOR '' Guidance Search through our collection of resources which make up all guidance issued by COPE. Expand Guidance sub-menu. Find guidance; Flowcharts; Guidelines; Cases; Member resources COPE offers a wide range of member-only benefits and services. Expand Member resources sub-menu. COPE Forum; eLearning; About COPE Become a member, find an existing member, or read more about COPE JOURNAL OF WORK APPLIED MANAGEMENT (JWAM) Guidance Search through our collection of resources which make up all guidance issued by COPE. Expand Guidance sub-menu. Find guidance; Flowcharts; Guidelines; Cases; Member resources COPE offers a wide range of member-only benefits and services. Expand Member resources sub-menu. COPE Forum; eLearning; About COPE Become a member, find an existing member, or read more about COPEALL FLOWCHARTS
COPE Flowcharts. COPE flowcharts offer a step by step process, for practical use on handling different aspects of publication ethics issues. For ease of use, we have combined all of COPE's flowcharts into one downloadable PDF which includes the flowcharts listed below. RETRACTION GUIDELINES Be clearly identified as a retraction (ie, distinct from other types of correction or comment) Be published promptly to minimise harmful effects. Be freely available to all readers (ie, not behind access barriers or available only to subscribers) State who is POTENTIAL PAPER MILLS Potential “paper mills” and what to do about them – a publisher’s perspective. A recent COPE forum discussion focused on the significant problem of “paper mills”. This term describes the process by which manufactured manuscripts are submitted to a journal for a fee on behalf of researchers with the purpose of providing an easy publication for them, or to offer authorship for sale. TEXT RECYCLING GUIDELINES FOR EDITORS Text recycling guidelines. 311.64 KB. Download. A common issue encountered by editors is overlap of text with an author’s own previously published work, particularly with the increasing use of plagiarism detection software. This practice is known as ‘textrecycling’ (also
SEARCH RESULTS FOR 'TRANSLATION' Registered charity No 1123023, Registered in England and Wales, Company No 6389120, Registered office: COPE, New Kings Court, Tollgate, Chandler's Ford, Eastleigh, Hampshire, SO53 STEEL IN TRANSLATION Registered charity No 1123023, Registered in England and Wales, Company No 6389120, Registered office: COPE, New Kings Court, Tollgate, Chandler's Ford, Eastleigh, Hampshire, SO53 ETHICAL APPROVAL FOR RETROSPECTIVE STUDY Hence we did not seek/obtain ethical approval for a study but rather project approval from the Ministry of Health. 5) Our analysis looked retrospectively at outcomes for a large cohort of patients treated. This was done internally as part of an audit/evaluation, so as to improve our quality of care. The decision to change the threshold was PROMOTING INTEGRITY IN SCHOLARLY RESEARCH AND ITSFIND GUIDANCEFLOWCHARTSGUIDELINESCASESCOPE FORUMELEARNING Core practices are the policies and practices journals and publishers need, to reach the highest standards in publication ethics. We include cases with advice, guidance for day-to-day practice, education modules and events on topical issues, to support journals and publishers fulfil their policies.ETHICAL OVERSIGHT
Ethical oversight. Ethical oversight should include, but is not limited to, policies on consent to publication, publication on vulnerable populations, ethical conduct of research using animals, ethical conduct of research using human subjects, handlingconfidential data
SEARCH RESULTS
COPE has many resources to assist publishers and editors in making decisions about ethical issues in publication, including guidelines, Allegations of misconduct. Authorship and contributorship. Complaints and appeals. Conflicts of interest / Competing interests. Journal management. Post-publication discussions and corrections. View webversion.
ETHICAL GUIDELINES FOR PEER REVIEWERS (ENGLISH) Guidance Search through our collection of resources which make up all guidance issued by COPE. Expand Guidance sub-menu. Find guidance; Flowcharts; Guidelines; Cases; Member resources COPE offers a wide range of member-only benefits and services. Expand Member resources sub-menu. COPE Forum; eLearning; About COPE Become a member, find an existing member, or read more about SEARCH RESULTSGUIDELINES Ethical guidelines for peer reviewers (English) Peer review in all its forms plays an important role in ensuring the integrity of the scholarly record. The process depends to a large extent on trust, and requires that everyone involved behaves responsibly and ethically. Peer reviewers play a central and critical part in the peer-reviewprocess
SEARCH RESULTS FOR '' Guidance Search through our collection of resources which make up all guidance issued by COPE. Expand Guidance sub-menu. Find guidance; Flowcharts; Guidelines; Cases; Member resources COPE offers a wide range of member-only benefits and services. Expand Member resources sub-menu. COPE Forum; eLearning; About COPE Become a member, find an existing member, or read more about COPE AUTHORSHIP AND CONTRIBUTORSHIP Ethical considerations around book publishing. Periodically, COPE gets requests for the development of discussion documents, guidance and flowcharts on publication ethics issues related to book publishing. Many of our members publish both journals and books, and a number of these members reference COPE guidance on journal publishing and ethicsALL FLOWCHARTS
COPE Flowcharts. COPE flowcharts offer a step by step process, for practical use on handling different aspects of publication ethics issues. For ease of use, we have combined all of COPE's flowcharts into one downloadable PDF which includes the flowcharts listed below. PLAGIARISM | COPE: COMMITTEE ON PUBLICATION ETHICS Advice: COPE was advised that the paper has been rejected. The editor wrote to each of the six authors threatening them with being reported to the dean if their explanations were unsatisfactory. The editor received five replies with four different excuses. The editor was advised to write to the dean of the medical school and include theauthors
POTENTIAL PAPER MILLS Potential “paper mills” and what to do about them – a publisher’s perspective. A recent COPE forum discussion focused on the significant problem of “paper mills”. This term describes the process by which manufactured manuscripts are submitted to a journal for a fee on behalf of researchers with the purpose of providing an easy publication for them, or to offer authorship for sale. PROMOTING INTEGRITY IN SCHOLARLY RESEARCH AND ITSFIND GUIDANCEFLOWCHARTSGUIDELINESCASESCOPE FORUMELEARNING Core practices are the policies and practices journals and publishers need, to reach the highest standards in publication ethics. We include cases with advice, guidance for day-to-day practice, education modules and events on topical issues, to support journals and publishers fulfil their policies.ETHICAL OVERSIGHT
Ethical oversight. Ethical oversight should include, but is not limited to, policies on consent to publication, publication on vulnerable populations, ethical conduct of research using animals, ethical conduct of research using human subjects, handlingconfidential data
SEARCH RESULTS
COPE has many resources to assist publishers and editors in making decisions about ethical issues in publication, including guidelines, Allegations of misconduct. Authorship and contributorship. Complaints and appeals. Conflicts of interest / Competing interests. Journal management. Post-publication discussions and corrections. View webversion.
ETHICAL GUIDELINES FOR PEER REVIEWERS (ENGLISH) Guidance Search through our collection of resources which make up all guidance issued by COPE. Expand Guidance sub-menu. Find guidance; Flowcharts; Guidelines; Cases; Member resources COPE offers a wide range of member-only benefits and services. Expand Member resources sub-menu. COPE Forum; eLearning; About COPE Become a member, find an existing member, or read more about SEARCH RESULTSGUIDELINES Ethical guidelines for peer reviewers (English) Peer review in all its forms plays an important role in ensuring the integrity of the scholarly record. The process depends to a large extent on trust, and requires that everyone involved behaves responsibly and ethically. Peer reviewers play a central and critical part in the peer-reviewprocess
SEARCH RESULTS FOR '' Guidance Search through our collection of resources which make up all guidance issued by COPE. Expand Guidance sub-menu. Find guidance; Flowcharts; Guidelines; Cases; Member resources COPE offers a wide range of member-only benefits and services. Expand Member resources sub-menu. COPE Forum; eLearning; About COPE Become a member, find an existing member, or read more about COPE AUTHORSHIP AND CONTRIBUTORSHIP Ethical considerations around book publishing. Periodically, COPE gets requests for the development of discussion documents, guidance and flowcharts on publication ethics issues related to book publishing. Many of our members publish both journals and books, and a number of these members reference COPE guidance on journal publishing and ethicsALL FLOWCHARTS
COPE Flowcharts. COPE flowcharts offer a step by step process, for practical use on handling different aspects of publication ethics issues. For ease of use, we have combined all of COPE's flowcharts into one downloadable PDF which includes the flowcharts listed below. PLAGIARISM | COPE: COMMITTEE ON PUBLICATION ETHICS Advice: COPE was advised that the paper has been rejected. The editor wrote to each of the six authors threatening them with being reported to the dean if their explanations were unsatisfactory. The editor received five replies with four different excuses. The editor was advised to write to the dean of the medical school and include theauthors
POTENTIAL PAPER MILLS Potential “paper mills” and what to do about them – a publisher’s perspective. A recent COPE forum discussion focused on the significant problem of “paper mills”. This term describes the process by which manufactured manuscripts are submitted to a journal for a fee on behalf of researchers with the purpose of providing an easy publication for them, or to offer authorship for sale.SEARCH RESULTS
COPE has many resources to assist publishers and editors in making decisions about ethical issues in publication, including guidelines, Allegations of misconduct. Authorship and contributorship. Complaints and appeals. Conflicts of interest / Competing interests. Journal management. Post-publication discussions and corrections. View webversion.
ALL FLOWCHARTS
COPE Flowcharts. COPE flowcharts offer a step by step process, for practical use on handling different aspects of publication ethics issues. For ease of use, we have combined all of COPE's flowcharts into one downloadable PDF which includes the flowcharts listed below. JOURNAL OF WORK APPLIED MANAGEMENT (JWAM) Guidance Search through our collection of resources which make up all guidance issued by COPE. Expand Guidance sub-menu. Find guidance; Flowcharts; Guidelines; Cases; Member resources COPE offers a wide range of member-only benefits and services. Expand Member resources sub-menu. COPE Forum; eLearning; About COPE Become a member, find an existing member, or read more about COPE RETRACTION GUIDELINES Be clearly identified as a retraction (ie, distinct from other types of correction or comment) Be published promptly to minimise harmful effects. Be freely available to all readers (ie, not behind access barriers or available only to subscribers) State who is POTENTIAL PAPER MILLS Potential “paper mills” and what to do about them – a publisher’s perspective. A recent COPE forum discussion focused on the significant problem of “paper mills”. This term describes the process by which manufactured manuscripts are submitted to a journal for a fee on behalf of researchers with the purpose of providing an easy publication for them, or to offer authorship for sale. CASE DISCUSSION: GIFT AUTHORSHIP Guidance Search through our collection of resources which make up all guidance issued by COPE. Expand Guidance sub-menu. Find guidance; Flowcharts; Guidelines; Cases; Member resources COPE offers a wide range of member-only benefits and services. Expand Member resources sub-menu. COPE Forum; eLearning; About COPE Become a member, find an existing member, or read more about TEXT RECYCLING GUIDELINES FOR EDITORS Text recycling guidelines. 311.64 KB. Download. A common issue encountered by editors is overlap of text with an author’s own previously published work, particularly with the increasing use of plagiarism detection software. This practice is known as ‘textrecycling’ (also
STEEL IN TRANSLATION Registered charity No 1123023, Registered in England and Wales, Company No 6389120, Registered office: COPE, New Kings Court, Tollgate, Chandler's Ford, Eastleigh, Hampshire, SO53 SEARCH RESULTS FOR 'TRANSLATION' Registered charity No 1123023, Registered in England and Wales, Company No 6389120, Registered office: COPE, New Kings Court, Tollgate, Chandler's Ford, Eastleigh, Hampshire, SO53 ETHICAL APPROVAL FOR RETROSPECTIVE STUDY Hence we did not seek/obtain ethical approval for a study but rather project approval from the Ministry of Health. 5) Our analysis looked retrospectively at outcomes for a large cohort of patients treated. This was done internally as part of an audit/evaluation, so as to improve our quality of care. The decision to change the threshold was PROMOTING INTEGRITY IN SCHOLARLY RESEARCH AND ITSFIND GUIDANCEFLOWCHARTSGUIDELINESCASESCOPE FORUMELEARNING Core practices are the policies and practices journals and publishers need, to reach the highest standards in publication ethics. We include cases with advice, guidance for day-to-day practice, education modules and events on topical issues, to support journals and publishers fulfil their policies.ETHICAL OVERSIGHT
Ethical oversight. Ethical oversight should include, but is not limited to, policies on consent to publication, publication on vulnerable populations, ethical conduct of research using animals, ethical conduct of research using human subjects, handlingconfidential data
SEARCH RESULTS
COPE has many resources to assist publishers and editors in making decisions about ethical issues in publication, including guidelines, Allegations of misconduct. Authorship and contributorship. Complaints and appeals. Conflicts of interest / Competing interests. Journal management. Post-publication discussions and corrections. View webversion.
AUTHORSHIP AND CONTRIBUTORSHIP Ethical considerations around book publishing. Periodically, COPE gets requests for the development of discussion documents, guidance and flowcharts on publication ethics issues related to book publishing. Many of our members publish both journals and books, and a number of these members reference COPE guidance on journal publishing and ethicsALL FLOWCHARTS
COPE Flowcharts. COPE flowcharts offer a step by step process, for practical use on handling different aspects of publication ethics issues. For ease of use, we have combined all of COPE's flowcharts into one downloadable PDF which includes the flowcharts listed below. ETHICAL GUIDELINES FOR PEER REVIEWERS (ENGLISH) Guidance Search through our collection of resources which make up all guidance issued by COPE. Expand Guidance sub-menu. Find guidance; Flowcharts; Guidelines; Cases; Member resources COPE offers a wide range of member-only benefits and services. Expand Member resources sub-menu. COPE Forum; eLearning; About COPE Become a member, find an existing member, or read more about COMPLAINTS AND APPEALS COPE will approach your complaint with systematic questions, clarifying the situation, and will attempt to help you understand and resolve your publication ethics problem. COPE is like Switzerland in its neutral, educational stance around complaints. COPE co-chairs Geri Pearson and Chris Graf. Vice Chair and Chair Elect Deborah Poff.GIFT AUTHORSHIP
COPE's guidance, as a flowchart, on Changes in authorship, Part (d) A request is received for the removal of an author after publication. Ask why the author wishes to be removed from list – refer to journal guidelines orthe authorship declaration which should state IS RETRACTION JUSTIFIED BECAUSE OF AN AUTHOR DISPUTE OVER Author X recently published a paper in Journal Y and has asked for the paper to be retracted. The reason given is that part of the data presented in the paper was published without the permission of a colleague, who is not listed as an author of IS IT UNETHICAL TO REJECT UNREGISTERED (OR LATE-REGISTERED The advice from the Forum was that, in general, it is probably best to judge each paper on a case by case basis. Some argued for leniency in the case of trials published in and around 2005, as many authors may not have been aware of the new requirements for registration. PROMOTING INTEGRITY IN SCHOLARLY RESEARCH AND ITSFIND GUIDANCEFLOWCHARTSGUIDELINESCASESCOPE FORUMELEARNING Core practices are the policies and practices journals and publishers need, to reach the highest standards in publication ethics. We include cases with advice, guidance for day-to-day practice, education modules and events on topical issues, to support journals and publishers fulfil their policies.ETHICAL OVERSIGHT
Ethical oversight. Ethical oversight should include, but is not limited to, policies on consent to publication, publication on vulnerable populations, ethical conduct of research using animals, ethical conduct of research using human subjects, handlingconfidential data
SEARCH RESULTS
COPE has many resources to assist publishers and editors in making decisions about ethical issues in publication, including guidelines, Allegations of misconduct. Authorship and contributorship. Complaints and appeals. Conflicts of interest / Competing interests. Journal management. Post-publication discussions and corrections. View webversion.
AUTHORSHIP AND CONTRIBUTORSHIP Ethical considerations around book publishing. Periodically, COPE gets requests for the development of discussion documents, guidance and flowcharts on publication ethics issues related to book publishing. Many of our members publish both journals and books, and a number of these members reference COPE guidance on journal publishing and ethicsALL FLOWCHARTS
COPE Flowcharts. COPE flowcharts offer a step by step process, for practical use on handling different aspects of publication ethics issues. For ease of use, we have combined all of COPE's flowcharts into one downloadable PDF which includes the flowcharts listed below. ETHICAL GUIDELINES FOR PEER REVIEWERS (ENGLISH) Guidance Search through our collection of resources which make up all guidance issued by COPE. Expand Guidance sub-menu. Find guidance; Flowcharts; Guidelines; Cases; Member resources COPE offers a wide range of member-only benefits and services. Expand Member resources sub-menu. COPE Forum; eLearning; About COPE Become a member, find an existing member, or read more about COMPLAINTS AND APPEALS COPE will approach your complaint with systematic questions, clarifying the situation, and will attempt to help you understand and resolve your publication ethics problem. COPE is like Switzerland in its neutral, educational stance around complaints. COPE co-chairs Geri Pearson and Chris Graf. Vice Chair and Chair Elect Deborah Poff.GIFT AUTHORSHIP
COPE's guidance, as a flowchart, on Changes in authorship, Part (d) A request is received for the removal of an author after publication. Ask why the author wishes to be removed from list – refer to journal guidelines orthe authorship declaration which should state IS RETRACTION JUSTIFIED BECAUSE OF AN AUTHOR DISPUTE OVER Author X recently published a paper in Journal Y and has asked for the paper to be retracted. The reason given is that part of the data presented in the paper was published without the permission of a colleague, who is not listed as an author of IS IT UNETHICAL TO REJECT UNREGISTERED (OR LATE-REGISTERED The advice from the Forum was that, in general, it is probably best to judge each paper on a case by case basis. Some argued for leniency in the case of trials published in and around 2005, as many authors may not have been aware of the new requirements for registration.SEARCH RESULTS
COPE has many resources to assist publishers and editors in making decisions about ethical issues in publication, including guidelines, Allegations of misconduct. Authorship and contributorship. Complaints and appeals. Conflicts of interest / Competing interests. Journal management. Post-publication discussions and corrections. View webversion.
SEARCH RESULTSFLOWCHARTS Guidance Search through our collection of resources which make up all guidance issued by COPE. Expand Guidance sub-menu. Find guidance; Flowcharts; Guidelines; Cases; Member resources COPE offers a wide range of member-only benefits and services. Expand Member resources sub-menu. COPE Forum; eLearning; About COPE Become a member, find an existing member, or read more about COPECOPE PRIVACY POLICY
The Committee on Publication Ethics ("COPE") is a charity registered in the United Kingdom (Registered Charity No 1123023, Registered in England and Wales, Company No 6389120). COPE is a member organisation which exists to educate and support editors, publishers and those involved in publication ethics with the aim of moving the culture of WHAT TO DO IF YOU SUSPECT PEER REVIEW MANIPULATION Guidance Search through our collection of resources which make up all guidance issued by COPE. Expand Guidance sub-menu. Find guidance; Flowcharts; Guidelines; Cases; Member resources COPE offers a wide range of member-only benefits and services. Expand Member resources sub-menu. COPE Forum; eLearning; About COPE Become a member, find an existing member, or read more about REMOVAL OF AN AUTHOR Guidance Search through our collection of resources which make up all guidance issued by COPE. Expand Guidance sub-menu. Find guidance; Flowcharts; Guidelines; Cases; Member resources COPE offers a wide range of member-only benefits and services. Expand Member resources sub-menu. COPE Forum; eLearning; About COPE Become a member, find an existing member, or read more about SEARCH RESULTS FOR 'TRANSLATION' Registered charity No 1123023, Registered in England and Wales, Company No 6389120, Registered office: COPE, New Kings Court, Tollgate, Chandler's Ford, Eastleigh, Hampshire, SO53AUTHORSHIP DISPUTE
Advice: Although not strictly an authorship dispute, it was questioned whether it is the editor’s job to resolve this type of dispute. The general consensus was that the complaint should be investigated at the author’s institition, with the paper put “on hold” for the time being. Three months might be a reasonable time frame in which to SEARCH RESULTS FOR '' Editor Steven Sabol Country USA Publisher Taylor and Francis ISSN 1947-5039 (online)1947-5020 Print SEARCH RESULTS FOR '' Editor Professor Jim Ryder Country UK Publisher Taylor and Francis ISSN 0305-7267 (Print), 1940-8412 (Online) SEARCH RESULTS FOR '' Editor Dr Louise Allcock Country UK Publisher Oxford University Press ISSN Online ISSN 1096-3642; Print ISSN 0024-4082 PROMOTING INTEGRITY IN SCHOLARLY RESEARCH AND ITSFIND GUIDANCEFLOWCHARTSGUIDELINESCASESCOPE FORUMELEARNING Core practices are the policies and practices journals and publishers need, to reach the highest standards in publication ethics. We include cases with advice, guidance for day-to-day practice, education modules and events on topical issues, to support journals and publishers fulfil their policies.ETHICAL OVERSIGHT
Ethical oversight. Ethical oversight should include, but is not limited to, policies on consent to publication, publication on vulnerable populations, ethical conduct of research using animals, ethical conduct of research using human subjects, handlingconfidential data
SEARCH RESULTS
COPE has many resources to assist publishers and editors in making decisions about ethical issues in publication, including guidelines, Allegations of misconduct. Authorship and contributorship. Complaints and appeals. Conflicts of interest / Competing interests. Journal management. Post-publication discussions and corrections. View webversion.
AUTHORSHIP AND CONTRIBUTORSHIP Ethical considerations around book publishing. Periodically, COPE gets requests for the development of discussion documents, guidance and flowcharts on publication ethics issues related to book publishing. Many of our members publish both journals and books, and a number of these members reference COPE guidance on journal publishing and ethicsALL FLOWCHARTS
COPE Flowcharts. COPE flowcharts offer a step by step process, for practical use on handling different aspects of publication ethics issues. For ease of use, we have combined all of COPE's flowcharts into one downloadable PDF which includes the flowcharts listed below. ETHICAL GUIDELINES FOR PEER REVIEWERS (ENGLISH) Guidance Search through our collection of resources which make up all guidance issued by COPE. Expand Guidance sub-menu. Find guidance; Flowcharts; Guidelines; Cases; Member resources COPE offers a wide range of member-only benefits and services. Expand Member resources sub-menu. COPE Forum; eLearning; About COPE Become a member, find an existing member, or read more about COMPLAINTS AND APPEALS COPE will approach your complaint with systematic questions, clarifying the situation, and will attempt to help you understand and resolve your publication ethics problem. COPE is like Switzerland in its neutral, educational stance around complaints. COPE co-chairs Geri Pearson and Chris Graf. Vice Chair and Chair Elect Deborah Poff.GIFT AUTHORSHIP
COPE's guidance, as a flowchart, on Changes in authorship, Part (d) A request is received for the removal of an author after publication. Ask why the author wishes to be removed from list – refer to journal guidelines orthe authorship declaration which should state IS RETRACTION JUSTIFIED BECAUSE OF AN AUTHOR DISPUTE OVER Author X recently published a paper in Journal Y and has asked for the paper to be retracted. The reason given is that part of the data presented in the paper was published without the permission of a colleague, who is not listed as an author of IS IT UNETHICAL TO REJECT UNREGISTERED (OR LATE-REGISTERED The advice from the Forum was that, in general, it is probably best to judge each paper on a case by case basis. Some argued for leniency in the case of trials published in and around 2005, as many authors may not have been aware of the new requirements for registration. PROMOTING INTEGRITY IN SCHOLARLY RESEARCH AND ITSFIND GUIDANCEFLOWCHARTSGUIDELINESCASESCOPE FORUMELEARNING Core practices are the policies and practices journals and publishers need, to reach the highest standards in publication ethics. We include cases with advice, guidance for day-to-day practice, education modules and events on topical issues, to support journals and publishers fulfil their policies.ETHICAL OVERSIGHT
Ethical oversight. Ethical oversight should include, but is not limited to, policies on consent to publication, publication on vulnerable populations, ethical conduct of research using animals, ethical conduct of research using human subjects, handlingconfidential data
SEARCH RESULTS
COPE has many resources to assist publishers and editors in making decisions about ethical issues in publication, including guidelines, Allegations of misconduct. Authorship and contributorship. Complaints and appeals. Conflicts of interest / Competing interests. Journal management. Post-publication discussions and corrections. View webversion.
AUTHORSHIP AND CONTRIBUTORSHIP Ethical considerations around book publishing. Periodically, COPE gets requests for the development of discussion documents, guidance and flowcharts on publication ethics issues related to book publishing. Many of our members publish both journals and books, and a number of these members reference COPE guidance on journal publishing and ethicsALL FLOWCHARTS
COPE Flowcharts. COPE flowcharts offer a step by step process, for practical use on handling different aspects of publication ethics issues. For ease of use, we have combined all of COPE's flowcharts into one downloadable PDF which includes the flowcharts listed below. ETHICAL GUIDELINES FOR PEER REVIEWERS (ENGLISH) Guidance Search through our collection of resources which make up all guidance issued by COPE. Expand Guidance sub-menu. Find guidance; Flowcharts; Guidelines; Cases; Member resources COPE offers a wide range of member-only benefits and services. Expand Member resources sub-menu. COPE Forum; eLearning; About COPE Become a member, find an existing member, or read more about COMPLAINTS AND APPEALS COPE will approach your complaint with systematic questions, clarifying the situation, and will attempt to help you understand and resolve your publication ethics problem. COPE is like Switzerland in its neutral, educational stance around complaints. COPE co-chairs Geri Pearson and Chris Graf. Vice Chair and Chair Elect Deborah Poff.GIFT AUTHORSHIP
COPE's guidance, as a flowchart, on Changes in authorship, Part (d) A request is received for the removal of an author after publication. Ask why the author wishes to be removed from list – refer to journal guidelines orthe authorship declaration which should state IS RETRACTION JUSTIFIED BECAUSE OF AN AUTHOR DISPUTE OVER Author X recently published a paper in Journal Y and has asked for the paper to be retracted. The reason given is that part of the data presented in the paper was published without the permission of a colleague, who is not listed as an author of IS IT UNETHICAL TO REJECT UNREGISTERED (OR LATE-REGISTERED The advice from the Forum was that, in general, it is probably best to judge each paper on a case by case basis. Some argued for leniency in the case of trials published in and around 2005, as many authors may not have been aware of the new requirements for registration.SEARCH RESULTS
COPE has many resources to assist publishers and editors in making decisions about ethical issues in publication, including guidelines, Allegations of misconduct. Authorship and contributorship. Complaints and appeals. Conflicts of interest / Competing interests. Journal management. Post-publication discussions and corrections. View webversion.
SEARCH RESULTSFLOWCHARTS Guidance Search through our collection of resources which make up all guidance issued by COPE. Expand Guidance sub-menu. Find guidance; Flowcharts; Guidelines; Cases; Member resources COPE offers a wide range of member-only benefits and services. Expand Member resources sub-menu. COPE Forum; eLearning; About COPE Become a member, find an existing member, or read more about COPECOPE PRIVACY POLICY
The Committee on Publication Ethics ("COPE") is a charity registered in the United Kingdom (Registered Charity No 1123023, Registered in England and Wales, Company No 6389120). COPE is a member organisation which exists to educate and support editors, publishers and those involved in publication ethics with the aim of moving the culture of WHAT TO DO IF YOU SUSPECT PEER REVIEW MANIPULATION Guidance Search through our collection of resources which make up all guidance issued by COPE. Expand Guidance sub-menu. Find guidance; Flowcharts; Guidelines; Cases; Member resources COPE offers a wide range of member-only benefits and services. Expand Member resources sub-menu. COPE Forum; eLearning; About COPE Become a member, find an existing member, or read more about REMOVAL OF AN AUTHOR Guidance Search through our collection of resources which make up all guidance issued by COPE. Expand Guidance sub-menu. Find guidance; Flowcharts; Guidelines; Cases; Member resources COPE offers a wide range of member-only benefits and services. Expand Member resources sub-menu. COPE Forum; eLearning; About COPE Become a member, find an existing member, or read more about SEARCH RESULTS FOR 'TRANSLATION' Registered charity No 1123023, Registered in England and Wales, Company No 6389120, Registered office: COPE, New Kings Court, Tollgate, Chandler's Ford, Eastleigh, Hampshire, SO53AUTHORSHIP DISPUTE
Advice: Although not strictly an authorship dispute, it was questioned whether it is the editor’s job to resolve this type of dispute. The general consensus was that the complaint should be investigated at the author’s institition, with the paper put “on hold” for the time being. Three months might be a reasonable time frame in which to SEARCH RESULTS FOR '' Editor Steven Sabol Country USA Publisher Taylor and Francis ISSN 1947-5039 (online)1947-5020 Print SEARCH RESULTS FOR '' Editor Professor Jim Ryder Country UK Publisher Taylor and Francis ISSN 0305-7267 (Print), 1940-8412 (Online) SEARCH RESULTS FOR '' Editor Dr Louise Allcock Country UK Publisher Oxford University Press ISSN Online ISSN 1096-3642; Print ISSN 0024-4082 Skip to main content COPE Show search Show menu Close * GuidanceSearch through our collection of resources which make up all guidance issued by COPE.Expand Guidance sub-menu* Find guidance
* Flowcharts
* Guidelines
* Cases
* Member resourcesCOPE offers a wide range of member-only benefits and services.Expand Member resources sub-menu* COPE Forum
* eLearning
* About COPEBecome a member, find an existing member, or read more about COPE and what we do.Expand About COPE sub-menu* Our organisation
* Core Practices
* Find a member
* Become a member
* Sign in
Search our website
PROMOTING INTEGRITY IN SCHOLARLY RESEARCH AND ITS PUBLICATION COPE provides leadership in thinking on publication ethics and practical resources to educate and support members, and offers a professional voice in current debates.Read more
COPE Digest newsletterMay Digest
At the beginning of a 3 year term as COPE Chair, Dan Kulp introduces this month's COPE Digest which includes a case discussion on gift authorship, and an invitation to the diversity, equity and inclusion webinar. Plus the monthly roundup of publication ethics news andevents.
Read more
OUR CORE PRACTICES
Core practices are the policies and practices journals and publishers need, to reach the highest standards in publication ethics. We include cases with advice, guidance for day-to-day practice, education modules and events on topical issues, to support journals and publishers fulfil their policies. Read more about core practices * Allegations of misconduct * Authorship and contributorship * Complaints and appeals * Conflicts of interest * Data and reproducibility* Ethical oversight
* Intellectual property * Journal management * Peer review processes * Post-publication discussions COPE FORUM: REGISTER COPE Members: register for the Forum on 9 June for discussion and advice on cases including ethics approval and consent, unresponsive authors delaying publication, manuscript submitted based on retracted paper, can two DOIs be assigned to the same manuscript? Read more & register GUIDANCE & DISCUSSION Flowcharts: authorship COPE's authorship and contributorship flowcharts include guidance on: changes in authorship; ghost, guest or gift authorship; how to recognise potential authorship problems. The flowcharts offer a step by step process for practical use by editors.See flowcharts
Case discussion: gift authorship A case was brought to COPE in 2007, but overly high productivity suggestive of systematic gift authorship is still very relevant in 2021. This case discussion adds to the Forum advice, with further analysis and guidance.Read more
New cases
New cases brought to the March Forum for discussion by members include: preprint plagiarism; author anonymity at the final proofreading stages; author alleges discrimination by institutionalreport.
Read cases with advice Editing, reviewing and writing during COVID We bring together support and guidance on issues that have come about during this crisis. Including articles on how authors, editors and reviewers are handling their work during this period, and guidelinesdeveloped.
Read more
Forum discussion: coordinating multi-journal complaints #C0PEMembers: register for the Forum on 9 June 2pm BST and join us to discuss the new cases submitted by members, and our Forum discussion topic on coordinating multi-journal complaints. Read more and register News: latest in publication ethics Read the latest publication ethics news, gathered by COPE, with articles on authorship, preprints, faked data, peer review and more.#PublicationEthics
Read more
Member insight: facilitation & integrity In this month's issue, COPE's Facilitation and Integrity Officer, Iratxe Puebla, looks at prevention, education and best practices in publication ethics with lessons from COPE's Facilitation & Integritysubcommittee.
Read more
Ethical considerations around book publishing Read a summary of the discussion held at our recent Forum, including the key differences between journal and books, and typical publication ethics cases that arise in book publishing.Read more & comment
USEFUL LINKS
* Become a member
* Contact Us
* Events
* Guidance
* Membership
* News & Opinion
SIGN UP TO COPE'S LATEST NEWSEmail Address *
CONNECT WITH COPE
* COPE Newsletter
* Governance
* Press
* COPE on Facebook
* Journalist
* COPE on Twitter
* Subcommittees
* Past Council Members* Privacy Policy
* Website Terms and Conditions * Trustees Reports and Financial Statements* History of COPE
Registered charity No 1123023, Registered in England and Wales, Company No 6389120, Registered office: COPE, New Kings Court, Tollgate, Chandler's Ford, Eastleigh, Hampshire, SO53 3LG, UnitedKingdom
Committee on Publication Ethics 2021 THIS WEBSITE USES COOKIES This website uses cookies to provide us with aggregated information about how users interact with our site, but not to track individual usage. By using this site, you accept the use of cookies.Accept Read more
Details
Copyright © 2024 ArchiveBay.com. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | DMCA | 2021 | Feedback | Advertising | RSS 2.0