Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
More Annotations
Best Online Casino - No deposit bonus code and Freespins
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Moving: Imóveis à venda, aluguel e lançamentos no Brasil
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Time in Pixels – All about filmmaking, cinematography and photography!
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
CATATAN MATEMATIKA | Soal UN, SBMPTN, OLIMPIADE, SIMAK UI, STIS, UTUL UGM, STAN, RPP-SILABUS
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Tehnot.com – главные новости из мира высоких технологий.
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Favourite Annotations
A complete backup of russianhelicopters.aero
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of speedsolving.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of normanrosenthal.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of rachelcorriefoundation.org
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Text
JSOMERS.NET
By James Somers. I should have loved biology but I found it to be a lifeless recitation of names: the Golgi apparatus and the Krebs cycle; mitosis, meiosis; DNA, RNA, mRNA, tRNA. In the textbooks, astonishing facts were presented without astonishment. Someone probably told methat every cell in
THE HACKER CLASSICS
Hacker News is no different from most of today's web in emphasizing what's new. When you're following a bunch of feeds, it's easy to forget that the web is the greatest library in the history of the world—and that a good library doesn't just have a rack ofnewspapers, it
WALLACE, DAVID FOSTER, E UNIBUS PLURAM: TELEVISION AND U.S Wallace, David Foster, E Unibus Pluram: Television and U.S. Fiction , Review of Contemporary Fiction, 13:2 (1993:Summer) p.151 DOCWRITER: THE TYPEWRITER THAT SENDS ITS KEYSTROKES IN A Ruby program in the cloud takes the output of this program (raw indexes like “6,0” for spacebar, or “5,3” for “j”) and maps them to strings, which it sends to a Google Doc using the watir gem for driving headless web browsers.. Can I get one? YOU’RE PROBABLY USING THE WRONG DICTIONARY The way I thought you used a dictionary was that you looked up words you’ve never heard of, or whose sense you’re unsure of. You would never look up an ordinary word — like example, or sport, or magic — because all you’ll learn is what it means, and that you already know.. Indeed, if you look up those particular words in the dictionary that comes with your computer — on my Mac, it THE THREE-PAGE PAPER THAT SHOOK PHILOSOPHY: GETTIERS INSEE MORE ONJSOMERS.NET
SPEED MATTERS: WHY WORKING QUICKLY IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN The obvious benefit to working quickly is that you’ll finish more stuff per unit time. But there’s more to it than that. If you work quickly, the cost of AUTOMATICALLY FINDING CODENAMES CLUES WITH GLOVE VECTORS Codenames is a Czech board game by Vlaada Chvátil where the goal is to say a one-word clue to your teammates in order to get them to choose correctly from the words laid out on the table. The real game is played on a 5x5 board, but here is a typical situation faced by a clue-giver: The three blue words are the target words—that's whatyou
HOW I REVERSE-ENGINEERED GOOGLE DOCS TO PLAY BACK ANY A screenshot showing what it’s like to work with a document in Draftback.. To produce the embed, I used a tool I made called Draftback, which I suppose I’m launching right now.With Draftback, you can play back and analyze any of your own Google Docs, or, for that matter, any Google Doc you have permission to edit. JAMES SOMERSSPEED MATTERSBEAUFORTIAN SCALE FOR AIRPLANE TURBULENCEWALL STREET STOLE MY SMART FRIENDS James Somers. James Somers is a writer and programmer based in New York, NY. Contact me at jsomers@gmail.com. contact me directly. On this page I have collected: my writing. scripts, programs, projects, and other code. books I've read.JSOMERS.NET
By James Somers. I should have loved biology but I found it to be a lifeless recitation of names: the Golgi apparatus and the Krebs cycle; mitosis, meiosis; DNA, RNA, mRNA, tRNA. In the textbooks, astonishing facts were presented without astonishment. Someone probably told methat every cell in
THE HACKER CLASSICS
Hacker News is no different from most of today's web in emphasizing what's new. When you're following a bunch of feeds, it's easy to forget that the web is the greatest library in the history of the world—and that a good library doesn't just have a rack ofnewspapers, it
WALLACE, DAVID FOSTER, E UNIBUS PLURAM: TELEVISION AND U.S Wallace, David Foster, E Unibus Pluram: Television and U.S. Fiction , Review of Contemporary Fiction, 13:2 (1993:Summer) p.151 DOCWRITER: THE TYPEWRITER THAT SENDS ITS KEYSTROKES IN A Ruby program in the cloud takes the output of this program (raw indexes like “6,0” for spacebar, or “5,3” for “j”) and maps them to strings, which it sends to a Google Doc using the watir gem for driving headless web browsers.. Can I get one? YOU’RE PROBABLY USING THE WRONG DICTIONARY The way I thought you used a dictionary was that you looked up words you’ve never heard of, or whose sense you’re unsure of. You would never look up an ordinary word — like example, or sport, or magic — because all you’ll learn is what it means, and that you already know.. Indeed, if you look up those particular words in the dictionary that comes with your computer — on my Mac, it THE THREE-PAGE PAPER THAT SHOOK PHILOSOPHY: GETTIERS INSEE MORE ONJSOMERS.NET
SPEED MATTERS: WHY WORKING QUICKLY IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN The obvious benefit to working quickly is that you’ll finish more stuff per unit time. But there’s more to it than that. If you work quickly, the cost of HOW I REVERSE-ENGINEERED GOOGLE DOCS TO PLAY BACK ANY A screenshot showing what it’s like to work with a document in Draftback.. To produce the embed, I used a tool I made called Draftback, which I suppose I’m launching right now.With Draftback, you can play back and analyze any of your own Google Docs, or, for that matter, any Google Doc you have permission to edit. AUTOMATICALLY FINDING CODENAMES CLUES WITH GLOVE VECTORS Codenames is a Czech board game by Vlaada Chvátil where the goal is to say a one-word clue to your teammates in order to get them to choose correctly from the words laid out on the table. The real game is played on a 5x5 board, but here is a typical situation faced by a clue-giver: The three blue words are the target words—that's whatyou
YOU’RE PROBABLY USING THE WRONG DICTIONARY The way I thought you used a dictionary was that you looked up words you’ve never heard of, or whose sense you’re unsure of. You would never look up an ordinary word — like example, or sport, or magic — because all you’ll learn is what it means, and that you already know.. Indeed, if you look up those particular words in the dictionary that comes with your computer — on my Mac, it THE SHAPE OF A LISTENER « THE JSOMERS.NET BLOG Having a sense of where you are in a conversation, of what’s apt and in play, is the bedrock social skill. It happens automatically. To be socially well-adjusted is to adjust well, to be highly responsive to the microdynamics of talk. Of course this only underlines the leverage that you have as a listener. That is, it invites you to invert INCONCEIVABLE THINGS Let's say you just got a job as Enumerator at a company that sells integers, and not more than an hour into your first day the vice president of Parity (E. Stevens) tells you "We need somethingcompletely new.
BY INSPECTION « THE JSOMERS.NET BLOG It’s a useful phrase to have in mind, and it’s led me to a somewhat strange idea—that science, and I mean this quite generally, has developed as though one of its goals was in fact to make more and more things provable that way, “by inspection.”. Consider, for example, how thousands of years ago one needed all kinds of clever KAVKA’S TOXIN PUZZLE « THE JSOMERS.NET BLOG In the January 1983 volume of the journal Analysis, Gregory Kavka presented the following philosophical thought experiment: An eccentric billionaire places before you a vial of toxin that, if you drink it, will make you painfully ill for a day, but will not threaten your life or have any lasting effects. The billionaire will pay you one million QUESTIONS PROMPTED BY READING THE BOOK Questions prompted by reading the book. How does a neuron decide how many dendrites, dendritic spines, and axons to build? And what is the distribution of those numbers?FD FAT DULLNESS
BETWEEN INSAl"\fITY Al"\fD FAT DULLNESS How I became an Emersonian By Phillip Lopace Discussed in th is c,,'~\': Em('Twn: Selecled Journals 1820-1842, edited by THOSE MAPS AT THE BEGINNING OF BOOKS, OR, A FEW WORDS The problem is not that these are bad maps, like that they omit salient details or leave too little to the imagination. It’s just that they’re in the wrong part of the book. Almost always, they’re buried in what book-people call the “front matter”: the edition notice, title page, dedication, table of contents, preface, forewordJSOMERS.NET
abstra ct This dissertation describ es Metacat, an extension of the Cop ycat computer mo del of analogy-making and high-lev el p erception dev elop ed b y Douglas Hofstadter Melan ADDRESS TO GRADUATING CLASS AT BENNINGTON COLLEGE Address to Graduating Class at Bennington College By KURT VONNEGUT, 1970. I hope you will all be very happy as members of the educatedclass in America.
JAMES SOMERSSPEED MATTERSBEAUFORTIAN SCALE FOR AIRPLANE TURBULENCEWALL STREET STOLE MY SMART FRIENDS James Somers. James Somers is a writer and programmer based in New York, NY. Contact me at jsomers@gmail.com. contact me directly. On this page I have collected: my writing. scripts, programs, projects, and other code. books I've read.JSOMERS.NET
By James Somers. I should have loved biology but I found it to be a lifeless recitation of names: the Golgi apparatus and the Krebs cycle; mitosis, meiosis; DNA, RNA, mRNA, tRNA. In the textbooks, astonishing facts were presented without astonishment. Someone probably told methat every cell in
THE HACKER CLASSICS
Hacker News is no different from most of today's web in emphasizing what's new. When you're following a bunch of feeds, it's easy to forget that the web is the greatest library in the history of the world—and that a good library doesn't just have a rack ofnewspapers, it
WALLACE, DAVID FOSTER, E UNIBUS PLURAM: TELEVISION AND U.S Wallace, David Foster, E Unibus Pluram: Television and U.S. Fiction , Review of Contemporary Fiction, 13:2 (1993:Summer) p.151 YOU’RE PROBABLY USING THE WRONG DICTIONARY The way I thought you used a dictionary was that you looked up words you’ve never heard of, or whose sense you’re unsure of. You would never look up an ordinary word — like example, or sport, or magic — because all you’ll learn is what it means, and that you already know.. Indeed, if you look up those particular words in the dictionary that comes with your computer — on my Mac, it THE SHAPE OF A LISTENER « THE JSOMERS.NET BLOG Having a sense of where you are in a conversation, of what’s apt and in play, is the bedrock social skill. It happens automatically. To be socially well-adjusted is to adjust well, to be highly responsive to the microdynamics of talk. Of course this only underlines the leverage that you have as a listener. That is, it invites you to invert SPEED MATTERS: WHY WORKING QUICKLY IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN The obvious benefit to working quickly is that you’ll finish more stuff per unit time. But there’s more to it than that. If you work quickly, the cost of AUTOMATICALLY FINDING CODENAMES CLUES WITH GLOVE VECTORS Codenames is a Czech board game by Vlaada Chvátil where the goal is to say a one-word clue to your teammates in order to get them to choose correctly from the words laid out on the table. The real game is played on a 5x5 board, but here is a typical situation faced by a clue-giver: The three blue words are the target words—that's whatyou
HOW I REVERSE-ENGINEERED GOOGLE DOCS TO PLAY BACK ANY A screenshot showing what it’s like to work with a document in Draftback.. To produce the embed, I used a tool I made called Draftback, which I suppose I’m launching right now.With Draftback, you can play back and analyze any of your own Google Docs, or, for that matter, any Google Doc you have permission to edit. ADDRESS TO GRADUATING CLASS AT BENNINGTON COLLEGE Address to Graduating Class at Bennington College By KURT VONNEGUT, 1970. I hope you will all be very happy as members of the educatedclass in America.
JAMES SOMERSSPEED MATTERSBEAUFORTIAN SCALE FOR AIRPLANE TURBULENCEWALL STREET STOLE MY SMART FRIENDS James Somers. James Somers is a writer and programmer based in New York, NY. Contact me at jsomers@gmail.com. contact me directly. On this page I have collected: my writing. scripts, programs, projects, and other code. books I've read.JSOMERS.NET
By James Somers. I should have loved biology but I found it to be a lifeless recitation of names: the Golgi apparatus and the Krebs cycle; mitosis, meiosis; DNA, RNA, mRNA, tRNA. In the textbooks, astonishing facts were presented without astonishment. Someone probably told methat every cell in
THE HACKER CLASSICS
Hacker News is no different from most of today's web in emphasizing what's new. When you're following a bunch of feeds, it's easy to forget that the web is the greatest library in the history of the world—and that a good library doesn't just have a rack ofnewspapers, it
WALLACE, DAVID FOSTER, E UNIBUS PLURAM: TELEVISION AND U.S Wallace, David Foster, E Unibus Pluram: Television and U.S. Fiction , Review of Contemporary Fiction, 13:2 (1993:Summer) p.151 YOU’RE PROBABLY USING THE WRONG DICTIONARY The way I thought you used a dictionary was that you looked up words you’ve never heard of, or whose sense you’re unsure of. You would never look up an ordinary word — like example, or sport, or magic — because all you’ll learn is what it means, and that you already know.. Indeed, if you look up those particular words in the dictionary that comes with your computer — on my Mac, it THE SHAPE OF A LISTENER « THE JSOMERS.NET BLOG Having a sense of where you are in a conversation, of what’s apt and in play, is the bedrock social skill. It happens automatically. To be socially well-adjusted is to adjust well, to be highly responsive to the microdynamics of talk. Of course this only underlines the leverage that you have as a listener. That is, it invites you to invert SPEED MATTERS: WHY WORKING QUICKLY IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN The obvious benefit to working quickly is that you’ll finish more stuff per unit time. But there’s more to it than that. If you work quickly, the cost of AUTOMATICALLY FINDING CODENAMES CLUES WITH GLOVE VECTORS Codenames is a Czech board game by Vlaada Chvátil where the goal is to say a one-word clue to your teammates in order to get them to choose correctly from the words laid out on the table. The real game is played on a 5x5 board, but here is a typical situation faced by a clue-giver: The three blue words are the target words—that's whatyou
HOW I REVERSE-ENGINEERED GOOGLE DOCS TO PLAY BACK ANY A screenshot showing what it’s like to work with a document in Draftback.. To produce the embed, I used a tool I made called Draftback, which I suppose I’m launching right now.With Draftback, you can play back and analyze any of your own Google Docs, or, for that matter, any Google Doc you have permission to edit. ADDRESS TO GRADUATING CLASS AT BENNINGTON COLLEGE Address to Graduating Class at Bennington College By KURT VONNEGUT, 1970. I hope you will all be very happy as members of the educatedclass in America.
THE JSOMERS.NET BLOG The game of Five’Em was invented by two friends of mine, Ben Gross and Rich Berger, to combat Hold’Em fatigue. The rules are simple: You’re dealt five hole cards instead of two, and after each round of community cards comes out (starting with the flop), you discard one of these extras. After the river is dealt, and you’ve discarded your THE SHAPE OF A LISTENER « THE JSOMERS.NET BLOG Having a sense of where you are in a conversation, of what’s apt and in play, is the bedrock social skill. It happens automatically. To be socially well-adjusted is to adjust well, to be highly responsive to the microdynamics of talk. Of course this only underlines the leverage that you have as a listener. That is, it invites you to invert MORE PEOPLE SHOULD WRITE « THE JSOMERS.NET BLOG More people should do what I’m doing right now. They should sit at their computers and bat the cursor around — write full sentences about themselves and the things they care about. I have a selfish reason for my demand: I have a lot of friends who are thoughtful, but keep their thoughts to themselves. I imagine finding notebooks undertheir
THOSE MAPS AT THE BEGINNING OF BOOKS, OR, A FEW WORDS If you’re out to understand a story that’s really located, as in deeply bound to a particular place, you would do well to have at least a murky mental picture of nearby landmarks, both natural and manmade.For books like Joyce’s Ulysses, where the action so often hinges on spatial minutiae — like which side of the street Bloom’s on — you probably need something more vivid, and of THE THREE-PAGE PAPER THAT SHOOK PHILOSOPHY: GETTIERS IN In 1963, the philosopher Edmund Gettier published a three-page paper in the journal Analysis that quickly became a classic in the field. Epistemologists going back to the Greeks had debated what it meant to know something, and in the Enlightenment, a definition was settled upon: to know something is to have a justified true belief about it:. justified in the sense of deriving from evidence “IT TURNS OUT” « THE JSOMERS.NET BLOG In other words, because “it turns out” is the sort of phrase you would use to convey, for example, something unexpected about a phenomenon you’ve studied extensively—as in the scientist saying “but the E. coli turned out to be totally resistant”—or some buried fact that you have recently discovered on behalf of yourreaders
KAVKA’S TOXIN PUZZLE « THE JSOMERS.NET BLOG In the January 1983 volume of the journal Analysis, Gregory Kavka presented the following philosophical thought experiment: An eccentric billionaire places before you a vial of toxin that, if you drink it, will make you painfully ill for a day, but will not threaten your life or have any lasting effects. The billionaire will pay you one million KENJITSU « THE JSOMERS.NET BLOG Think of them as the basic tenets of what I’ll call “the art of knowledge-fighting” or, more succinctly, kenjitsu, from ken = “one’s range of knowledge” and jitsu = “fighting art”: Try to become like the kind of pestering student who slows down classes. Incessantly ask questions and restate what the “teacher” says inyour
HOW I REVERSE-ENGINEERED GOOGLE DOCS TO PLAY BACK ANY A screenshot showing what it’s like to work with a document in Draftback.. To produce the embed, I used a tool I made called Draftback, which I suppose I’m launching right now.With Draftback, you can play back and analyze any of your own Google Docs, or, for that matter, any Google Doc you have permission to edit. MOST BOOK CLUBS ARE DOING IT WRONG « THE JSOMERS.NET BLOG The standard way to run a book club is to have everybody finish the book before meeting to talk about it. You have one meeting per book. The discussion goes on for one or two hours before it runs out of gas, and then the group picks the next book, and you agree to meet in another month or six weeks.JAMES SOMERS
James Somers is a writer and programmer based in New York, NY. Contact me at jsomers@gmail.com contact me directly On this page I have collected:* my WRITING
* scripts, programs, projects, and other CODE* BOOKS I've read
WRITING
The articles with asterisks (*) have gotten the most attention. I've highlighted a few of my favorites.THE NEW YORKER
* The Pastry A.I. That Learned to Fight Cancer*
* Immune Disorder: The breakdown of cellular society in COVID-19*
* The Engineers Taking on the Ventilator Shortage * Snow Science Against the Avalanche * How Hackers Won the Water * How AlphaZero Mastered Its Games*
* The Friendship That Made Google Huge*
A story about the two most senior engineers at Google, Jeff Dean and Sanjay Ghemawat, who have built much of the company's most important infrastructure—as a pair. For twenty years, they've worked together at a single computer, one of them working the keyboard, the other sitting back, correcting and cajoling like a producer in a news anchor's ear. (read more)THE ATLANTIC
* The Scientific Paper is Obsolete*
* The Coming Software Apocalypse*
* Torching the Modern-Day Library of Alexandria*
* Don't Use the Force, Luke—Use the Targeting Computer * How the Like Button Ruined the Internet*
* Why New York Subway Lines Are Missing Countdown Clocks*
* The Man Who Would Teach Machines to Think*
What if the best ideas in artificial intelligence are yellowing in a drawer in Bloomington? Douglas Hofstadter, the Pulitzer Prize-winning author of Gödel, Escher, Bach, thinks we've lost sight of what artificial intelligence really means. In this 7,500-word profile for _The Atlantic Monthly_, my first article in print, I follow Hofstadter's stubborn quest to replicate the human mind. (read more) * Learning About Work Ethic From My High School Driving Instructor*
* Composition 101: How Email Can Change the Way Professors Teach*
* How I Failed, Failed, and Finally Succeeded at Learning How toCode
*
* On the Floor Laughing: Traders Are Having a New Kind of Fun*
* Why Learning to Fly (or Code) Is Easier Than You Think*
* The Simple Software That Could—but Probably Won't—Change theFace of Writing
*
* The Computer in the Basement: Learning to Code, Then and Now THE NEW YORK TIMES MAGAZINE * New Frontiers in Mobile LeisureTHE VILLAGE VOICE
* Keepers of the Secrets*
This article appeared in the last print edition of the Voice. It started with a tip from a fellow journalist: _I was told that the most interesting man in the world works in the archives division of the New York Public Library, and so I went there, one morning this summer, to meet him. My guide, who said it took her a year to learn how to get around the Schwarzman Building on 42nd Street, led us to an elevator off Astor Hall, up past the McGraw Rotunda, through a little door at the back of the Rose Main Reading Room. Our destination was Room 328._OUTSIDE:
* The Paradox of Going Outside*
“Before the bear came it was a grab bag of small miseries...” An essay about a close call, nature, work, and my possibly doomed hankering for the authentic wild. _I have become too much a friend to rules; I have slept for too long in a soft bed; I have grown quite comfortably into the rites of a civilized life and as a result I think I have become something of a fucking infant... But in the very breath of my demand for the “authentic” wild, the un-guided tour, I’m cringing at how flaccid and disgracefully naive I probably sound—how much like one of Krakauer’s goons, the kind of person who will either gentrify the woods or get myself killed inthem._ (read more)
THE MIT TECHNOLOGY REVIEW * Is AI Riding a One-Trick Pony?*
* Toolkits for the Mind*
NAUTILUS
* What Searchable Speech Will Do To YouBACKCHANNEL:
* Should Surgeons Keep Score?*
It turns out that there is huge variation in skill among surgeons, and that this is the biggest factor determining the outcome of many surgical procedures. So which surgeon you get matters—a lot. But how do we know who the good ones are? In this article, I profile a biostatistician at Memorial Sloan Kettering who is developing a program to give surgeons feedback about their performance. Included are two videos—one of a good surgeon, one of a surgeon who's not so good—that everyone should see. * What happens when a device records all your conversations? BLOG (JSOMERS.NET/BLOG ): * We need more tiny knowledge projects—here's one*
* I should have loved biology*
* Automatically finding Codenames clues with GloVe vectors*
* Introducing Five'Em, a Texas Hold'Em variant * The three-page paper that shook philosophy: Gettiers in softwareengineering
* DocWriter: the typewriter that sends its keystrokes in real timeto a Google Doc
* Most book clubs are doing it wrong* Speed matters *
* You're probably using the wrong dictionary * Something about this essay struck a nerve —it has been read by more than 130,000 people. It's a lament about the state of today's dictionaries, and an argument in favor of using Noah Webster's 1913 edition (with instructions for how to install it). _I don’t want you to conclude that it’s just a matter of aesthetics. Yes, Webster’s definitions are prettier. But they are also better. In fact they’re so much better that to use another dictionary is to keep yourself forever at arm’s length from theactual language._
_Recall that the New Oxford, for the word “fustian,” gives “pompous or pretentious speech or writing.” I said earlier that that wasn’t even really correct. Here, then, is Webster’s definition: “An inflated style of writing; a kind of writing in which high-sounding words are used, above the dignity of the thoughts or subject; bombast.” Do you see the difference? What makes fustian fustian is not just that the language is pompous—it’s that this pomposity is above the dignity of the thoughts or subject. It’s using fancy language where fancy language isn’t called for. It’s a subtle difference, but that’s the whole point: English is an awfully subtle instrument. A dictionary that ignores these little shades is dangerous; in fact in those cases it’s worse than useless. It’s misleading, deflating. It divests those words of their worth andpurpose._
* How I Reverse-Engineered Google Docs To Play Back Any Document’sKeystrokes
*
The story of how I made Draftback.
It has been covered by FiveThirtyEight,
Lifehacker
,
the Daily Mail
,
The Next Web
,
and Canadian national radio.
_If you’ve ever typed anything into a Google Doc, you can now play it back as if it were a movie — like traveling through time to look over your own shoulder as you write._ _This is possible because every document written in Google Docs since about May 2010 has a revision history that tracks every change, by every user, with timestamps accurate to the microsecond; these histories are available to anyone with “Edit” permissions; and I have written a piece of software that can find, decode, and rebuild the history for any given document._ (read more)*
More people should write * * The best general advice on earth * The shape of a listener * Project Euler #191* Six lines
* Social Annealing
* Perfunctory Offers * Exploring the complexity of driving directions * * Kavka's toxin puzzle* "It turns out" *
* Compuchemical economies * The Role of Deliberate Practice in the Acquisition of ExpertPerformance
* Kenjitsu *
* Why the Law
* Wandering the web stacks * * Rule 110, or, how a little orange dot becomes a universal computer* By inspection
* Offline Wikipedia * * Anatomy of a Project Euler problem, and, some remarks on the OEIS* Metacat
* Those maps at the beginning of books, or, a few words aboutteaching
* Feynman's Rigor
BOOKS
This is a list of the books I've read since my first day at college, arranged basically in the order I read them. I have the list both to jog my memory and because I've read a lot of stuff I've loved, and want other people to find it. * NEUROMANCER, William Gibson. * RAISE HIGH THE ROOFBEAMS, CARPENTERS and SEYMOUR: AN INTRODUCTION, J.D. Salinger.
* NARCISSUS AND GOLDMUND, Hermann Hesse. * WHAT IS THOUGHT?, Eric Baum. * MY BELIEF: ESSAYS ON LIFE AND ART, Hermann Hesse. * NAOMI, Junichiro Tanizaki. * THE U.S. CONSTITUTION.
* DEMIAN, Hermann Hesse. * THE MIND'S I, Douglas Hofstadter and Dan Dennett. * A compendium on the philosophy of mind; Hofstadter and Dennett take turns providing commentary for each of the selectedessays/stories.
* Highlights:
* "Computing Machinery and Intelligence", in which Turing proposeshis eponymous test.
* "The Turing Test: A Coffeehouse Conversation." * "Minds, Brains, and Programs" (especially Hofstadter's response). * Thomas Nagel's classic, "What Is It Like to Be a Bat?" * PERMUTATION CITY, Greg Egan. * THE AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF YUKICHI FUKUZAWA, Yukichi Fukuzawa. * THE GOOD SOLDIER: A TALE OF PASSION, Ford Madox
Ford.
* THE ILIAD, Homer.
* FREEDOM AND NEUROBIOLOGY: REFLECTIONS ON FREE LANGUAGE WILL, AND POLITICAL POWER, John Searle. * I AM A STRANGE LOOP, Douglas Hofstadter. * A "softer" and less satisfying version of much of Hofstadter's earlier writing. It may be a good introduction to his ideas for people who don't have time for _GEB_ or find it too technical.* The best pages
of this book (from the first chapter) are available in Amazon's "LookInside" reader.
* THE WASTE LAND , T.S. Eliot * The link above points to the raw text online but this print edition has tons of excellent annotations, commentary, and criticism, which are pretty much necessary for a poem this difficult. * PERFECTLY REASONABLE DEVIATIONS FROM THE BEATEN TRACK, Richard P.Feynman
* I have written about Feynman here . See this wonderful series of videos, "Fun to Imagine," in
which he explains (a) why mirrors seem to reverse left-and-right but not up-and-down, (b) how trains stay on the tracks, and (c) how rubber bands work. Fantastic stuff. * Other Feynman videos worth watching: The Last Journey of a Genius, about
his adventure to Tannu Tuva. Warning: a real tear-jerker. Also, of course, The Pleasure of Finding Things Out.
* Here's a great short pieceon
Feynman's involvement with a massively-parallel supercomputer known as "The Connection Machine." * THE GOD DELUSION, Richard Dawkins.* ZHUANGZI ,
Zhuangzi.
* THE ELEMENTS OF STYLE , William Strunk Jr. and White, E.B. * This is a classic and is full of excellent advice about style. But it is dangerous, overly prescriptive, and in many places wrong; do asite search
on one of my favorite blogs, The Language Log , to see all of their carefully argued (and vehement) criticism. * Also read George Orwell's "Politics and the English Language."
* THE SELFISH GENE, Richard Dawkins. * LOST IN THE FUNHOUSE, John Barth. * THREE LIVES, Gertrude Stein. * SIDDHARTHA, Hermann Hesse. * THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS,
Lewis Carroll.
* THE ANALECTS, Confucius. * "To learn, and at due times to repeat what one has learnt — is that not after all a pleasure?" * TO THE LIGHTHOUSE, Virginia Woolf * THE ANIMAL MIND, James L. Gould. * This was heavily cited in Eric Baum's WHAT IS THOUGHT?, and with good reason: it's full of impressive displays of animal intelligence. * DARWIN AMONG THE MACHINES: THE EVOLUTION OF GLOBAL INTELLIGENCE,George Dyson.
* A strange and problematic thesis, but fascinating nonetheless. There is a wonderful line in here where at "odd, unpredictable" moments Dyson found himself "wondering whether trees could think. Not thinking the way we think, but thinking the way trees think; say, two or three hundred years to form the slow trace of an idea." * COSMOPOLIS: THE HIDDEN AGENDA OF MODERNITY, Stephen Toulmin. * NARRATIVE THOUGHT AND NARRATIVE LANGUAGE, Bruce K. Britton and Anthony D. Pelligrini (eds.). * LIFE: WHAT A CONCEPT!, Freeman Dyson, J. Craig Venter, George Church, Robert Shapiro, Dimitar Sasselov, and Seth Lloyd. * EVARISTE GALOIS, Laura Rigatelli Toti. * Read his Wikipedia page— what an
exciting and romantic life. I'd like to write a screenplay about itsomeday.
* THE ART OF WAR, Sun Tzu. * A PORTRAIT OF THE ARTIST AS A YOUNG MAN, James Joyce. * EVERYTHING AND MORE: A COMPACT HISTORY OF INFINITY, David FosterWallace.
* THUS SPAKE ZARATHUSTRA, Friedrich Nietzsche. * COMEUPPANCE: COSTLY ALTRUISTIC SIGNALING PUNISHMENT, AND OTHER BIOLOGICAL COMPONENTS OF FICTION, William Flesch. * FRANNY AND ZOOEY, Salinger, J.D. * HUMAN INFERENCE: STRATEGIES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF SOCIAL JUDGMENT, Richard E. Nisbett and Lee Ross. * CAT'S CRADLE, Kurt Vonnegut. * WELCOME TO THE MONKEY HOUSE, Kurt Vonnegut. * My favorite collection of Vonnegut stories. What a crisp, straightforward writer, and a brilliant storyteller. He never wastesyour time.
* METAMAGICAL THEMAS, Douglas Hofstadter. * Another compendium from Hofstadter — a collection of all of his _Scientific American_ columns. "Metamagical Themas" is remarkably an anagram of "Mathematical Games," the title of his predecessor Martin Gardner's column (on recreational mathematics). Crazy! * GODEL, ESCHER, BACH: AN ETERNAL GOLDEN BRAID, Douglas Hofstadter. * MATHEMATICS: A VERY SHORT INTRODUCTION, Timothy Gowers. * HIDDEN ORDER: HOW ADAPTATION BUILDS COMPLEXITY, John H. Holland * I had Holland as a professor at the U of M. He was brilliant, and an excellent teacher. I also recommend his EMERGENCE: FROM CHAOS TOORDER
.
* A MATHEMATICIAN'S APOLOGY, G. H. Hardy. * This is as good as everyone says it is. Hardy was mostly famous for two things: this book, and discovering the true genius Ramanujan. Read a biography
of _him_.
* A PEOPLE'S HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES, Howard Zinn. * Like Will Hunting says, this one will blow your hair back. * THE BIG LEBOWSKI: THE MAKING OF A COEN BROTHERS FILM, Tricia Cooke and William Preston Robertson. * Shows the Coen brothers' obsessive attention to detail. Every shot is storyboarded, and every piece of the production — wardrobes, lighting, casting, etc. — is meticulously planned. They're the Joyceof filmmaking.
* THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS, Thomas S. Kuhn * CECI N'EST PAS UNE PIPE, Michel Foucault. * BRIEF INTERVIEWS WITH HIDEOUS MEN, David Foster Wallace. * Some of my favorite short fiction is in here. See, e.g., thisand this .
* BREAKING THE SPELL: RELIGION AS A NATURAL PHENOMENON, DanielDennett.
* DIALOGUES WITH CHILDREN, Gareth Mathews. * Proof that children can do philosophy, and a study of an excellentteacher in action.
* REMARKS ON COLOR, Ludwig Wittgenstein. * TAO TE CHING, Laozi. * Drastically overrated. * THE DIAMOND AGE, Neal Stephenson. * HAMLET, William Shakespeare. * THE VISUAL DISPLAY OF QUANTITATIVE INFORMATION, Edward Tufte. * Worthwhile even if all you learn is to maximize his "data-ink"ratio .
* COMPLICATIONS: A SURGEON'S NOTES ON AN IMPERFECT SCIENCE, AtulGawande.
* PHANTOMS IN THE BRAIN: PROBING THE MYSTERIES OF THE HUMAN MIND, V.S. Ramachandran.
* Some of the coolest — i.e., the most fascinating — stuff I've ever read. This book may tempt you to drop everything for a career in neurology or cognitive neuroscience. * DUBLINERS, James Joyce. * My professor called "The Dead"the best short
story of all time. "Better pass boldly into that other world, in the full glory of some passion, than fade and wither dismally with age." * AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF MALCOLM X, Malcolm X with Alex Haley. * NINE STORIES, Salinger, J.D. * Some of these stories took Salinger more than a year to write, each. It paid off — they're incredible. Gems. * THE PLEASURE OF FINDING THINGS OUT, Richard P. Feynman. * 1000 MOST IMPORTANT WORDS, Norman W. Schur. * THE HEDGEHOG AND THE FOX, Isaiah Berlin. * ULYSSES, James Joyce. * WRITING IN UNREADERLY TIMES, Kevin Smokler. * ZINGERMAN'S GUIDE TO GIVING GREAT SERVICE, Ari Weinzweig. * Zingerman's , in Ann Arbor, MI, is arguably the best (and best-run) deli outside of
New York. And part of what makes it so special is their highlyregarded
company culture and especially the way they treat customers. This book is a great guide for doing that yourself, as most of the ideas and advice are less about the restaurant industry than the giving-people-what-they-want industry. * ON BULLSHIT, Harry G. Frankfurt. * I WANT TO BE A MATHEMATICIAN, Paul R. Halmos * What an incredible book — I will have it by my bedside whereverI live.
* Halmos was a beautiful writer and a hard worker. Here's what he had to say on the subject: > Archimedes taught us that a small quantity added to itself often > enough becomes a large quantity (or, in proverbial terms, every > little bit helps). When it comes to accomplishing the bulk of the > world's work, and, in particular, when it comes to writing a book, I > believe that the converse of Archimedes' teaching is also true: the > only way to write a large book is to keep writing a small bit of it, > steadily every day, with no exception, with no holiday. * THE BLANK SLATE: THE MODERN DENIAL OF HUMAN NATURE, Steven Pinker. * SNOW CRASH, Neal Stephenson. * GODEL'S PROOF, Ernest Nagel and James R. Newman. * It's hard to overstate the importance of what Godel achieved. Nagel and Newman do a superb job of explaining his remarkably clever and loopy proof, a proof which inspired Hofstadter to write the incomparable GODEL, ESCHER, BACH. In fact, this is one of Hofstadter'sfavorite books.
* WINESBURG, OHIO, Sherwood Anderson. * A study of "grotesques." As some writer says in the afterword, it has a lot to teach us about humility, ambivalence, and self-doubt. * THE EQUATION THAT COULDN'T BE SOLVED, Mario Livio. * THE VAGINA MONOLOGUES, Eve Ensler. * ANATHEM, Neal Stephenson. * A MAN WITHOUT A COUNTRY, Kurt Vonnegut. * SYSTEMANTICS, John Gall. * THE DIP, Seth Godin. * FEAR AND TREMBLING, Soren Kierkegaard. * MYTHOLOGIES, Roland Barthes. * THE STRANGER, Albert Camus. * GETTING TO MAYBE: HOW TO EXCEL ON LAW SCHOOL EXAMS, Richard Michael Fischl and Jeremy Paul. * I wrote about this a bit in my piece , "Why theLaw"
* PROOF, David Auburn. * CODERS AT WORK, Peter Seibel. * UNACCUSTOMED EARTH, Jhumpa Lahiri. * SIX EASY PIECES, Richard Feynman. * HARVEY PENICK'S LITTLE RED BOOK: LESSONS AND TEACHINGS FROM A LIFETIME IN GOLF, Harvey Penick. * LOLITA, Vladimir Nabokov. * HOW FICTION WORKS, James Wood. * I recommend this to any amateur reader (or writer) of fiction. It gives you a great toolbox for thinking about the craft — and it'll make you a better reader. * THIS CRAFT OF VERSE, Jorge Luis Borges. * ENVISIONING INFORMATION, Edward Tufte. * THE NINE, Jeffrey Toobin. * GIRL WITH CURIOUS HAIR, David Foster Wallace. * THE BEST OF ISAAC ASIMOV, Isaac Asimov. * My favorite stories, in order, were "The Last Question," "Nightfall
," and
"Billiard Ball."
* THE ART AND CRAFT OF JUDGING: THE DECISIONS OF JUDGE LEARNED HAND,Hershel Shanks.
* Fantastic. Learned Handwas a beautiful
expositor, and a crystal-clear thinker. One of the great minds of hiscentury.
* JUNK MAIL, Will Self. * TINKERS, Paul Harding. * SURELY YOU'RE JOKING, MR. FEYNMAN!, Richard Feynman. * Self-recommending. Read it with an eye toward Feynman's disposition, his particular way of thinking — concretely, simply, with a hard reflex against the _illusion_ of understanding. * THE HUMAN STAIN, Philip Roth. * GANG LEADER FOR A DAY, Sudhir Venkatesh. * STORY OF MY LIFE, Jay McInerney. * THE ROAD, Cormac McCarthy. * WISE CHOICES, APT FEELINGS: A THEORY OF NORMATIVE JUDGEMENT, AllanGibbard.
* ZEN FLESH, ZEN BONES, Paul Reps and Nyogen Senzaki, eds. * Disappointing except for "Centering", which was excellent. * INSIDE "JEOPARDY!": WHAT REALLY GOES ON AT TV'S TOP QUIZ SHOW,Harry Eisenberg.
* There is lots of interesting info about how the show works: how clues are written, researched, vetted, etc., and how individual episodes are produced. * THE CHOMSKY-FOUCAULT DEBATE ON HUMAN NATURE, Noam Chomsky and Michel Foucault, ed. John Rajchman. * A MATHEMATICIAN'S LAMENT: HOW SCHOOL CHEATS US OUT OF OUR MOST FASCINATING AND IMAGINATIVE ART FORM, Paul Lockhart. * The expanded book version of this wonderful essay on mathematicseducation.
* LOOK AT THE BIRDIE, Kurt Vonnegut. * THE CATCHER IN THE RYE, J. D. Salinger. * DUNE, Frank Herbert. * WAMPETERS, FOMA & GRANFALLOONS (OPINIONS), Kurt Vonnegut. * I particularly liked "Science Fiction", "Excelsior! We're Going to the Moon! Excelsior!", "Why They Read Hesse", "Biafra: A People Betrayed", "Address to Graduating Class at Bennington College, 1970", "Address to the National Institute of Arts And Letters, 1971", "Reflections on My Own Death", "Address at Rededication of Wheaton College Library, 1973", and "Playboy Interview". * THE LITTLE SCHEMER, Daniel P. Friedman and Matthias Felleisen. * A wonderful book. From essentially nothing, it builds you up to the point where you can write (or at least understand) (a) the applicative-order fixed point combinator for functionals, and (b) an interpreter for the very language you're writing in. * Here's a readable derivation of the Y combinatorbased on the
one given in the book. * Here's a more compact attempt, by Paul Graham,
to build a Lisp interpreter from the ground up. * EXPLAINING CONSCIOUSNESS: THE HARD PROBLEM, ed. Jonathan Shear. * A collection of papers responding to David Chalmers's "Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness ," in which he famously introduces the term "the hard problem." The hard problem is the problem of explaining how first-person phenomenal experiences—colors, tastes, itches, pains, thoughts, moods, mental images, feels, etc.—arise in the brain, which looks to be nothing more than a really complicated collection of jiggling atoms, just like everything else in our physical world. * A good portion of the book is available online at Google Books. Since it's just a collection of papers, it should be easy enough to find whatever you need. * Chalmers's response to the responses might be a good way of getting a lay of the land without having to trudge through 400 pages of detailed arguments. * If anything the book chipped away at my staunch materialism. I feel a lot more open to Chalmers's view, which initially struck me as almost laughably absurd. The hard problem is so hard, I now think, that it warrants quite drastic moves, like introducing something fundamental to the ontology of the world. * ARMAGEDDON IN RETROSPECT, Kurt Vonnegut. * A collection of his writings on war, both fiction and nonfiction.Quite good.
* COMMUNICATION WITH EXTRATERRESTRIAL INTELLIGENCE (CETI), PROCEEDINGS OF A CONFERENCE HELD AT THE BYURAKAN ASTROPHYSICAL OBSERVATORY, YEREVAN, USSR, 5-11 SEPTEMBER 1971, edited by Carl Sagan. * One of maybe two or three of the most interesting books I've read. * The chief aims of the conference were, first, to estimate values for terms of the Drake equation, and
second, to devise strategies for contact. Necessarily, then, they had to discuss a remarkable range of topics—everything from the chemical origins of life, to the anthropology of early civilizations, to the problem of encoding messages in a form comprehensible to intelligences vastly unlike ourselves. * The conferencegoers were some of the top scientists from around the world, chiefly the US and USSR. And if anything the pleasure here is in watching them think and debate in a relatively informal setting. It's a wonderful mix of prepared talks and extemporaneous discussion. * THE MAN WHO LOVED ONLY NUMBERS: THE STORY OF PAUL ERDŐS AND THE SEARCH FOR MATHEMATICAL TRUTH, Paul Hoffman. * A wonderful book about a wonderful man. Captivating, fast, and fun. Erdős was the most prolific mathematician who ever lived, publishing 1,475 papers, many of them hugely important. * HONEYBEE DEMOCRACY, Thomas D. Seeley. * First, Seeley explains in wonderfully lucid detail just how bees go about finding their new homes (nest sites). I came away feeling like an expert on the subject—no doubt a testament to Seeley's expository skill. Second, the illustrations are fantastic: Edward Tufte would be proud. Finally, this serves nicely as a case study in basic science: how to explore, how to ask useful questions, how to design experiments, how to patiently collect data, how to make sense of your results, and how to tell a coherent story about them. * THE BED OF PROCRUSTES: PHILOSOPHICAL AND PRACTICAL APHORISMS, Nassim Nicholas Taleb. * Provocative, in both good and bad ways. * CRYPTONOMICON, Neal Stephenson. * Easily one of my favorite books. This is actually the second time I've read it—the first was in high school, and unfortunately I think much of it went over my head (though it probably influenced me in all kinds of subtle ways). It's a book that repays many returns. * FOR A BREATH I TARRY, Roger Zelazny. * HOW ANIMALS WORK, Knut Schmidt-Nielsen. * There is a surprising and fascinating detail every five pages or so. It gets a bit technical, but the writing is remarkably understatedand lucid.
* HOW THE MIND WORKS, Steven Pinker. * AND THEN WE CAME TO THE END, Joshua Ferris. * PALINDROMES AND ANAGRAMS, Howard W. Bergerson. * LE TON BEAU DE MAROT: IN PRAISE OF THE MUSIC OF LANGAUGE, DouglasHofstadter
* Quintessential Hofstadter. * The index for this book apparently took Hofstadter one full month of fifteen-hour days to pull off, which, when you see it, seems like not nearly enough time! * YOURS EVER: PEOPLE AND THEIR LETTERS, Thomas Mallon. * Mallon is an excellent editor, writer, and reader, and a wonderful tour guide through centuries of private lives. * IMPRO: IMPROVISATION AND THE THEATRE, Keith Johnstone. * PROTAGORAS , Plato. * ONE TWO THREE... INFINITY: FACTS AND SPECULATIONS OF SCIENCE,George Gamow.
* This is a book that should be printed in massive quantities and sprinkled everyplace youngsters hang out, in the hope that just a few of them pick it up and delightedly fall headfirst into a life ofscience.
* Deserving of all its praise (see for example the distribution ofreviews on Amazon
).
* THE SCREWTAPE LETTERS, C. S. Lewis. * Incisive chronicle of the many ways humans stray from the good life. Lewis is a master observer of subtly pernicious psychology. * Amusing, witty, and wise, just like most of Lewis's stuff. * THE MARTIAN CHRONICLES, Ray Bradbury. * STAR MAKER, Olaf Stapledon. * Wildly imaginative but maybe too abstract, lacking the standard hooks of successful speculative fiction (like characters, or detailed close-ups of the worlds). * Stellar prose. It's florid but not purple and laced with an almostbiblical majesty.
* PATHOLOGIES OF POWER: HEALTH, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND THE NEW WAR ON THEPOOR, Paul Farmer.
* MERE CHRISTIANITY, C. S. Lewis. * C. S. LEWIS'S LOST AENEID, C. S. Lewis, ed. A. T. Reynes. * Lewis is a wonderful translator. * Only books one, two, and six are translated at any length, enough to show that the Aeneid is a hell of a story. * THE JOHN MCPHEE READER, John McPhee, ed. William L. Howarth. * When I grow up, what would I like to be? A modified John McPhee! * It's hard to overstate how much I admire McPhee's work and writing. He's a master craftsman. Howarth's introduction tells and the rest of the book shows. * LET THE GREAT WORLD SPIN, Colum McCann. * MAXIMUM CITY, Suketu Mehta. * FIELD NOTES ON SCIENCE AND NATURE, ed. Michael R. Canfield. * A beautiful, readable, very _useful_ book. * One is quickly sold on the power of narratives and sketches, and notes in general, for recording information, remembering stuff, and most important, propelling the mind into a reflective observant mode. * ZODIAC, Neal Stephenson. * THE BEST AMERICAN ESSAYS (2010), ed. Christopher Hitchens. * My favorites were "Gyromancy," "The Elegant Eyeball," "On John Updike," "Irreconcilable Dissonance," "The Dead Book," and "My Genome, My Self," in that order. * THE QUEST FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: A HISTORY OF IDEAS AND ACHIEVEMENTS, Nils J. Nilsson. * FLUID CONCEPTS AND CREATIVE ANALOGIES: THE FUNDAMENTAL MECHANISMS OF THOUGHT, Douglas Hofstadter. * BEATRICE AND VIRGIL, Yann Martel. * A very quick read, and very suspenseful. You're drawn through the book on your tiptoes. But I kept waiting for the story to gear up in earnest, and kept waiting, until I had only a slim fingerful of pages left and nothing meaty yet had happened. I was left unsatisfied. * "Unsatisfied," I say, except that the last few pages, particularly the short "games"... they're incredible. * ANGELS AND AGES: A SHORT BOOK ABOUT DARWIN, LINCOLN, AND MODERNLIFE, Adam Gopnik.
* Way, way better than you probably think it's going to be. Gopnik is a brilliant essayist. * REAMDE, Neal Stephenson. * Stephenson is a very indulgent writer. A friend at work said he was like an investigative journalist of his own imagination. When a character plugs in a router, it's 500 words about router configuration; when someone has to pick a lock, it's an essay on lock-picking and hacker culture; anytime a gun goes off it's a very careful description of bolts and safeties and the heft of the thing and firing mechanisms; when the plot calls for a flight across the Pacific it's a whole chapter's worth of great circle routes and the "what it's like" of bizjet travel. All very accurate. This is why I mostly like reading his stuff, because you _learn_ so much in a tastyplot package.
* If I like _REAMDE_ less than some of his other books, though, it's because the stuff he ends up teaching here is not as super interesting as the stuff, say, in _Cryptonomicon_ or _The Diamond Age_. (I feel like I'd be much better at paintball after reading this book; in fact I was watching Die Hard 2 not too long after and the whole time I was thinking of how pathetically thoughtless all the maneuvers and tactics were in that movie, as compared to what I'd "seen" in Stephenson'sbook.)
* SPARSE DISTRIBUTED MEMORY, Pentti Kanerva. * A coherent high-level account of how memory might work. Neurons are attractors in a space of bitstrings, which code for on/off features in the world. Bitstrings address neurons, which store addresses to other neurons; the chain either diverges (no recall) or converges to the best match. * The mathematics of the space {0, 1}N ensure, first, that any two points chosen at random are far apart, but always closely connectable by a third; and second—for that reason—that a sparse and manageably-sized collection of address decoders (neurons) is sufficient to solve the best-match problem when N is massive(~10,000).
* Q.E.D: BEAUTY IN MATHEMATICAL PROOF, Burkard Polster. * A very short book with beautiful illustrations of elegant proofs. * THE IDEA FACTORY: BELL LABS AND THE GREAT AGE OF AMERICAN INNOVATION, Jon Gertner. * Worth reading just for its account of the invention of the transistor. Great material, too, on Claude Shannon. * Includes a very interesting concluding chapter that tries to explain what made Bell Labs so successful, and where we might find something similar today. Is it Silicon Valley? (No.) Gertner wrote a summary of that argument for the New York Times here.
* THE PSYCHOPATH TEST: A JOURNEY THROUGH THE MADNESS INDUSTRY, JonRonson.
* UNDERGROUND: THE TOKYO GAS ATTACK AND THE JAPANESE PSYCHE, HarukiMurakami.
* MY FIRST SUMMER IN THE SIERRA, John Muir. * What I would give to have one day of Muir's summer, or better yet, one small ounce of his happy attitude. * THE LADY IN THE LOOKING-GLASS, Virginia Woolf. * THE WAY OF MAN: ACCORDING TO THE TEACHING OF HASIDISM, MartinBuber.
* THE LONG DARK TEA-TIME OF THE SOUL, Douglas Adams. * FINAL APPROACH: THE CRASH OF EASTERN 212, William Stockton. * THE LAUNCH PAD: INSIDE Y COMBINATOR, SILICON VALLEY'S MOST EXCLUSIVE SCHOOL FOR STARTUPS, Randall Stross. * THE GRASSHOPPER: GAMES, LIFE AND UTOPIA, Bernard Suits. * The editorial review summarizes well: "In the mid twentieth century the philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein famously asserted that games are indefinable; there are no common threads that link them all. 'Nonsense,' says the sensible Bernard Suits: 'playing a game is a voluntary attempt to overcome unnecessary obstacles.' The short book Suits wrote demonstrating precisely that is as playful as it is insightful, as stimulating as it is delightful." * This book is a shining example of philosophical thinking, of intellectual integrity: it articulates in the best possible light the best objections to its thesis, "come what may." That it manages convincingly to knock them all down is just icing. And in style: it's been a long while since I've read writing this clear, and yet it's not overbearing—it manages to be both precise and light. * Another one of those special books that I read on a whim and that will, I fear, never be read by anyone I recommend it to. * CLOUD ATLAS, David Mitchell. * As good as everyone says. Mitchell is an unbelievable prosestylist.
* My favorite was the long chapter that spanned the middle of the book. I preferred the second halves of the stories more often than the first halves; I particularly enjoyed the second half of the Frobisherletters.
* MR. PENUMBRA'S 24-HOUR BOOKSTORE, Robin Sloan. * Quick, unserious, but very engrossing. A joy to read. * THE CORRECTIONS, Jonathan Franzen. * HOW TO WIN FRIENDS AND INFLUENCE PEOPLE, Dale Carnegie. * Rightfully a classic; not so self-helpy as you'd think. * Quoted on p. 75: "Whenever you go out of doors, draw the chin in, carry the crown of the head high, and fill the lungs to the utmost; drink in the sunshine; greet your friends with a smile, and put soul into every handclasp." * Fundamentally people want a sense of importance. "William James said: 'The deepest principle in human nature is the craving to beappreciated.'"
* THE IMPERFECTIONISTS, Tom Rachman. * A great read, and devastating. * BOTH FLESH AND NOT: ESSAYS, David Foster Wallace. * TURING'S CATHEDRAL: THE ORIGINS OF THE DIGITAL UNIVERSE, GeorgeDyson.
* THE GIVER, Lois Lowry. * I remember liking _The Giver_ when I, along with millions of other American kids, read it in middle school. And I remember liking it because it was cryptic—it gestured at something secretly significant. And that in itself is interesting, because re-reading it now I can see that it _isn't_, as it turns out, a cryptic book. It's actually pretty straightforward—still great, but no longer glowing with some ineffable magic. What does that mean? Does it mean my mind's gotten stronger, or weaker? * TENTH OF DECEMBER, George Saunders. * THE NOVEL, James Michener. * HOW TO BE ALONE, Jonathan Franzen. * My favorite essays from this collection were, in the order of how much I liked them, "My Father's Brain" (about his father's Alzheimer's), "Sifting the Ashes" (about cigarettes), "Lost in the Mail" (about the Chicago post office) and "Books in Bed" (about books about sex). I imagine these can all be found in full online. * CHILD OF GOD, Cormac McCarthy. * HIROSHIMA, John Hersey. * INTUITION PUMPS AND OTHER TOOLS FOR THINKING, Daniel C. Dennett. * WORKING: PEOPLE TALK ABOUT WHAT THEY DO ALL DAY AND HOW THEY FEEL ABOUT WHAT THEY DO, Studs Terkel. * MORTALITY, Christopher Hitchens. * Charming, honest essays about dying from a person who lived well * The afterword by his wife is beautiful * INGENIOUS: A TRUE STORY OF INVENTION, AUTOMOTIVE DARING, AND THE RACE TO REVIVE AMERICA, Jason Fagone. * THE KITE RUNNER, Khaled Hosseini. * WHAT WE TALK ABOUT WHEN WE TALK ABOUT LOVE, Raymond Carver. * Besides the title story, my favorites were "Tell the Women We're Going," "After the Denim," "The Bath," and "Everything Stuck to Him." * ON INTELLIGENCE: HOW A NEW UNDERSTANDING OF THE BRAIN WILL LEAD TO THE CREATION OF TRULY INTELLIGENT MACHINES, Jeff Hawkins. * ALOFT: THOUGHTS ON THE EXPERIENCE OF FLIGHT, William Langewiesche. * THE HITCHHIKER'S GUIDE TO THE GALAXY, Douglas Adams. * IN THE PLEX: HOW GOOGLE THINKS, WORKS, AND SHAPES OUR LIVES,Steven Levy.
* THE MEZZANINE, Nicholson Baker. * THE LOGIA OF YESHUA, translated by Guy Davenport and BenjaminUrrutia.
* CONVERSATIONS WITH DAVID FOSTER WALLACE, ed. Stephen J. Burn. * THE PHANTOM TOLLBOOTH, Norton Juster. * "all the puzzle and excitement of everything he didn't know" * HOMICIDE: A YEAR ON THE KILLING STREETS, David Simon. * THE JOURNALIST AND THE MURDERER, Janet Malcolm. * INFINITE JEST, David Foster Wallace. * ORYX AND CRAKE, Margaret Atwood. * DEMOCRACY AND DISTRUST: A THEORY OF JUDICIAL REVIEW, John HartEly.
* Ely writes and thinks like Bernard Suits in _The Grasshopper_: with cases, clarity, and good humor. * MY AGE OF ANXIETY: FEAR, HOPE, DREAD, AND THE SEARCH FOR PEACE OF MIND, Scott Stossel. * Funny, fascinating, earnest, informative, and consistently fun to read. I can't believe how much of a page-turner this was, given itssubject.
* THE INFORMATION: A HISTORY, A THEORY, A FLOOD, James Gleick. * THE DESIGN OF EVERYDAY THINGS, Donald A. Norman. * VOX, Nicholson Baker. * COMING INTO THE COUNTRY, John McPhee. * SIGNIFYING RAPPERS: RAP AND RACE IN THE URBAN PRESENT, Mark Costello and David Foster Wallace. * THE WIKIPEDIA REVOLUTION: HOW A BUNCH OF NOBODIES CREATED THE WORLD'S GREATEST ENCYCLOPEDIA, Andrew Lih. * Much more interesting, informative, and inspiring than I wasexpecting.
* THE HARD THING ABOUT HARD THINGS: BUILDING A BUSINESS WHEN THERE ARE NO EASY ANSWERS, Ben Horowitz. * LIBRA, Don DeLillo. * THE LIFESPAN OF A FACT, John D'Agata and Jim Fingal. * WHISKEY TANGO FOXTROT, David Shafer. * TOTAL RECALL, Gordon Bell and Jim Gemmell. * BETTER: A SURGEON'S NOTES ON PERFORMANCE, Atul Gawande. * THE SENSE OF STYLE, Steven Pinker. * GEEK SUBLIME: THE BEAUTY OF CODE, THE CODE OF BEAUTY, VikramChandra.
* BONFIRE OF THE VANITIES, Tom Wolfe. * METAPHORS WE LIVE BY, George Lakoff and Mark Johnson. * THE FERMATA, Nicholson Baker. * THE MEDUSA AND THE SNAIL: MORE NOTES OF A BIOLOGY WATCHER, LewisThomas.
* THE OLD MAN AND THE SEA, Ernest Hemingway. * THE FIRE NEXT TIME, James Baldwin. * THE SUN ALSO RISES, Ernest Hemingway. * KING LEAR, William Shakespeare. * ANOTHER COUNTRY, James Baldwin. * SEVENEVES, Neal Stephenson. * Stephenson might have the best job in the world. You can see how he uses his novels to dive into subjects that interest him. In that sense he's a lot like a journalist. These projects are an excuse for him to study and talk to smart people and even to do original research over the course of many years. In this book those topics include: orbital mechanics, mining culture, the physics of chains, big space engineering, epigenetics, and glider flight. * The premise and storyline of this book might be the best Stephenson has ever come up with. The moon blows up in the first sentence; this causes a chain reaction that will, it is calculated, wipe out the planet in two years. The action takes place in three parts; the first and last of these are gripping and fascinating. The last part in particular is fun to read and imaginative. The middle part is a slog, and takes up about ten times too many pages. One consequence of Stephenson being (it seems) a scholar first and a storyteller second is that he indulges in technical detail. When he's describing new worlds, and the story is moving fast (as in the third section), that's welcome—but when the going is slow, all the minutiae is painful. * INTO THIN AIR, Jon Krakauer * THE MARTIAN, Andy Weir * MOBY-DICK, Herman Melville * Everything it's cracked up to be. * THE DELTOID PUMPKIN SEED, John McPhee * THE DREAM MACHINE: J.C.R. LICKLIDER AND THE REVOLUTION THAT MADE COMPUTING PERSONAL, M. Mitchell Waldrop * THE LOVE AFFAIRS OF NATHANIEL P., Adelle Waldman * STATION ELEVEN, Emily St. John Mandel * THE BIG SHORT, Michael Lewis * THE GHOST WRITER, Philip Roth * AN ANTHROPOLOGIST ON MARS, Oliver Sacks * CHANGING PLACES, David Lodge * THE ANDROMEDA STRAIN, Michael Crichton * THE BEAUTIFUL AND DAMNED, F. Scott Fitzgerald * THE PLEASURES AND SORROWS OF WORK, Alain de Botton * An unusual little book that ought to be read widely. It's a generous, funny, thoughtful look at the work that we do now—in logistics, in back offices, in science and infrastructure engineering—and what that means. * The chapter on painting was my favorite. * de Botton has a roving, essaying style sort of like DFW's in his nonfiction—he goes places and meets strangers, like a reporter, but instead of merely reporting he shows you what's going on inside his head. It makes for a more entertaining read, and it feels more honest. * UBIK, Philip K. Dick * CONTACT, Carl Sagan * A CONFEDERACY OF DUNCES, John Kennedy Toole * THIRTEEN DAYS: A MEMOIR OF THE CUBAN MISSILE CRISIS, Robert F.Kennedy
* THE STAND, Stephen King * Maybe the most gripping novel I've read. The characters and scenes are incredibly vivid—King writes in a way where you _see_ everything that's happening. And it's hard to imagine a more compelling premise and plot. The characters felt alive. * This will be my go-to recommendation to anyone looking for a fun, engaging read. The perfect beach or subway book. * PALE FIRE, Vladimir Nabokov * I believe Kinbote is the author of Canto IV. * The poem itself is, I think, a great work of literature, and it's a stroke of genius to have embedded it in this strange novel, first because it must have greatly multiplied the poem's audience, and second because it has a way of weakening your critical stance toward it—you don't go into it thinking, "Here's a poem I must criticize," but thinking rather, "Oh, how neat—a little poem." * ORANGES, John McPhee * THE HANDMAID'S TALE, Margaret Atwood * THE GUNS OF AUGUST, Barbara W. Tuchman * ALL THE PRESIDENT'S MEN, Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward * THE NEW BLOOMSDAY BOOK: A GUIDE THROUGH ULYSSES, Harry Blamires * My book group has been reading _Ulysses_, and this guide has been indispensable—reading it before each chapter of _U_ made what was literally going on in each scene vastly more accessible. * SOURDOUGH, Robin Sloan * Such a joyful book—and a joy to read. I may have even liked it more than _Penumbra_. This one has that same infectious love for theworld.
* ONCE A RUNNER, John L. Parker Jr. * More people should write books like this: fictional odes to thething they love.
* ON BEAUTY, Zadie Smith * THE CONTROL OF NATURE, John McPhee * CHILDHOOD'S END, Arthur C. Clarke * THE MACHINERY OF LIFE, David S. Goodsell * What a book! Required reading, and especially so for high schoolers and college students. I wasn't much interested in bio as a student but now am hungry to learn more about it, and sort of wish I'd fallen down the rabbit-hole when I was in school. This book would have been a great way in. * I first heard about it via this blog post about how cells are "very fast and crowded places." Indeed, in the first few chapters of the book, this model of the inside of a cell is articulated very clearly. I'd always wondered what it meant for genes to be "expressed" and _when_ exactly this would happen, how long it would go on, how often it would be repeated. This book gave me a mental model of the cell that explains gene expression in a simple way: our transcription machinery, like all proteins in the cell, are bouncing around at random, very quickly, encountering other molecules to bind with (or not); when they encounter DNA, they transcribe ("express") it. Gene expression is modulated—genes are "turned off" or on—when the DNA encoding that gene is literally hidden from the transcription machinery, by being packed into the crevasses of tight chromatinbundles.
* There are lots of drawings by Goodsell, along with videos, explanations, and other stuff, at the protein data bank.
* There are some excerpts on this page . * THE BEAUTIFUL BRAIN: THE DRAWINGS OF SANTIAGO RAMÓN Y CAJAL, Larry W. Swanson, Eric Newman, Alfonso Araque, Janet M. Dubinsky * There are some open questions I had after reading the book on thispage .
* THE DOUBLE HELIX: A PERSONAL ACCOUNT OF THE DISCOVERY OF THE STRUCTURE OF DNA, James D. Watson * UNCOMMON CARRIERS, John McPhee * I, CLAUDIUS, Robert Graves * SEX AND THE CITY, Candace Bushnell * DEFINING THE WIND: THE BEAUFORT SCALE, AND HOW A 19TH-CENTURY ADMIRAL TURNED SCIENCE INTO POETRY, Scott Huler * A surprisingly wonderful book whose basic point is to pay closer attention to the world around you—a bit like _Field Notes on Scienceand Nature_.
* I was inspired to write my own Beaufortian scale for airplaneturbulence .
* MY BRILLIANT FRIEND, Elena Ferrante. * 11/22/63, Stephen King. * SING, UNBURIED, SING, Jesmyn Ward. * JURASSIC PARK, Michael Crichton. * Wow! An incredibly captivating read. And complements the movie: both were ideal versions of the story for their form. Here in the book you get lots more motivation and justification—it's very technical to the point of seeming real. * Makes me want Crichton's job: study a world of science or engineering in great depth, and as payment, produce page-turningfiction about it.
* Did you know that at one point, Chrichton had the nation's #1 bestselling book, the top movie at the box office, and the most-watched television series, _all at the same time_—and that this happened TWICE (!)? * THE WHITE DARKNESS, David Grann. * THE SOUL OF A NEW MACHINE, Tracy Kidder. * DON QUIXOTE, Miguel de Cervantes (translated by Edith Grossman). * DRAFT NO. 4: ON THE WRITING PROCESS, John McPhee. * THE WAVES, Virginia Woolf. * THE COURSE OF LOVE, Alain de Botton. * THE AVALANCHE HUNTERS, Montgomery Atwater. * DREYER'S ENGLISH: AN UTTERLY CORRECT GUIDE TO CLARITY AND STYLE,Benjamin Dreyer.
* SHOGUN, James Clavell. * THE THREE-BODY PROBLEM, Cixin Liu. * THE MAN WHO KNEW INFINITY, Robert Kanigel. * THE DARK FOREST, Cixin Liu. * DEATH'S END, Cixin Liu. * MEDICINE WALK, Richard Wagamese. * THE SENSE OF AN ENDING, Julian Barnes. * NIGHT BOAT TO TANGIER, Kevin Barry. * A COMPUTER SCIENTIST'S GUIDE TO CELL BIOLOGY, William W. Cohen. * THE REMAINS OF THE DAY, Kazuo Ishiguro. * A VISIT FROM THE GOON SQUAD, Jennifer Egan. * STONER, John Williams. * THE EIGHTH DAY OF CREATION, Horace Freeland Judson. * THE UNDERGROUND RAILROAD, Colson Whitehead. * THE FRIEND, Sigrid Nunez. * WIDE SARGASSO SEA, Jean Rhys. * CITY OF THIEVES, David Benioff. * CHANGES IN THE LAND, William Cronon. * DEACON KING KONG, James McBride. * HAMNET, Maggie O'Farrell. * INTERIOR CHINATOWN, Charles Yu. * BIONANOTECHNOLOGY: LESSONS FROM NATURE, David Goodsell.PROJECTS
* My friend Ben and I wrote a New York Times crossword puzzle, which appeared in print on Saturday, October 20th 2018. You can download ithere
.
* I reverse-engineered Google Docsto create
Draftback , a tool which allows you to play back any Google Doc's history as though it were a movie. (See an examplehere
,
from a FiveThirtyEight article about the tool.) It has more than 300,000 users, most of them teachers and students. Here's a note about how it's being used in the classroom, from the _Journal of Interactive Technology and Pedagogy_.
* My friend Ben and I made a typewriter that sends its keystrokes in real time to a Google Doc. We call it the DocWriter.
* I created a tool for reporters that syncs notes to a recording, and generates a timecoded transcript . * I've made a very simple typewriter simulator (a text editor where you can't hit Delete) at jsomers.net/typerwriter.
* As discussed in this blog post , I tapped into the Google Directions API to answer a few neat questions about driving directions, including "What's the most complicated route in the United States?" The relevant code is here.
* I wrote up my solution to Project Euler problem #106 in this blog post . Here is a more recent solution , this time in Ruby, to problem #215. And here's a write-up for problem #191.
* On this page I wrote some Javascript to quickly generate rows of the Rule 110 cellular automaton.
* Copyright © 2021 James Somerswrite meDetails
Copyright © 2024 ArchiveBay.com. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | DMCA | 2021 | Feedback | Advertising | RSS 2.0