Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
More Annotations
A complete backup of alfredo-haeberli.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of valueaddedtravel.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of athenstransport.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of eca-international.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of choicesmarkets.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of yellowimages.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Favourite Annotations
A complete backup of agawamhousing.org
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of edf-renouvelables.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of healthtipsportal.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of berniebeckman.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of isayweinfeld.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Text
Blog.
JUSTICES REFUSE TO REQUIRE ISSUE EXHAUSTION OF SOCIAL The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held in Carr v. Saul, 593 U.S. ____ (2021), that the principles of issue exhaustion do not require Social Security disability claimants to argue at the agency level that the administrative law judges hearing their disability claims were unconstitutionally appointed. FOUR CASES ON THE DOCKET FOR SUPREME COURT THIS WEEK The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in four cases this week, all of which were originally scheduled to be heard last term. Issues before the justices included the statute of limitation for military rape charges, the Constitutional definition of “seizure,” and GRAHAM V CONNOR ESTABLISHED STANDARD FOR EXCESSIVE FORCE In Graham v.Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989), the U.S. Supreme Court established the legal framework for evaluating excessive force claims against law enforcement officers.Under the Court’s decision, courts must apply the objective reasonableness standard to the particular facts and circumstances of the case. SCOTUS TO HEAR POTENTIAL BLOCKBUSTER VOTING RIGHTS CASE Next month, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear two significant voting rights cases out of Arizona. The cases, Arizona Republican Party v.Democratic National CommitteeandBrnovich v. Democratic National Committee, involve an Arizona policy that requires voters who vote in person to do so in their assigned precincts and a state law that prohibits so-called “ballot harvesting,” in which mail ARTICLE IV: THE EXTRADITION CLAUSE Article IV: The Extradition Clause. A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to ARTICLE I, SECTION SEVEN The 'Travis Translation' of Article 1, Section 7: Clause 1: Any bill raising money (taxes) must begin in the House of Representatives, but the Senate must agree with it, just like any other bill. Clause 2: When a bill passes both the House and the Senate, the bill goes to BLOCKBURGER V UNITED STATES ESTABLISHED “SAME ELEMENTS In Blockburger v United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932), the U.S. Supreme Court clarified when two offenses are the same for purposes of Fifth Amendment’s Double Jeopardy Clause.Under the “same elements” test, a defendant may be convicted of two offenses arising out of the same criminal incident if each crime contains an element not found inthe other.
ABRAMS V. UNITED STATES: THE DISSENT THAT SHAPED FREE SPEECH Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes’ dissent in Abrams v.United States 250 U.S. 616 (1919) is widely regarded as one of the most famous dissents in the history of the U.S. Supreme Court. It sowed the seeds for the modern interpretation of freedom of speech under the First Amendment. BAKER V. NELSON: THE FORGOTTEN SAME-SEX MARRIAGE CASE The Facts of the Case in Baker v. Nelson. The case stemmed from a marriage application filed by two male University of Minnesota students. The clerk denied the application based on a state law that restricted marriage to “persons of the opposite sex.”. The couple then filed a lawsuit against the clerk, Gerald Nelson, assertingviolations of
CURRENT - CONSTITUTIONAL LAW REPORTER Constitutional Law Reporter RSS. Kent on 19th Century Damages Litigation against Federal Officers, Bivens, & Qualified Immunity - Legal Theory Blog. Date: 5/28/2021. Bueno de Mesquita, Kapilashrami, & Mason on Human Rights, Global Health Law, & COVID-19 - Legal TheoryBlog.
JUSTICES REFUSE TO REQUIRE ISSUE EXHAUSTION OF SOCIAL The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held in Carr v. Saul, 593 U.S. ____ (2021), that the principles of issue exhaustion do not require Social Security disability claimants to argue at the agency level that the administrative law judges hearing their disability claims were unconstitutionally appointed. FOUR CASES ON THE DOCKET FOR SUPREME COURT THIS WEEK The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in four cases this week, all of which were originally scheduled to be heard last term. Issues before the justices included the statute of limitation for military rape charges, the Constitutional definition of “seizure,” and GRAHAM V CONNOR ESTABLISHED STANDARD FOR EXCESSIVE FORCE In Graham v.Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989), the U.S. Supreme Court established the legal framework for evaluating excessive force claims against law enforcement officers.Under the Court’s decision, courts must apply the objective reasonableness standard to the particular facts and circumstances of the case. SCOTUS TO HEAR POTENTIAL BLOCKBUSTER VOTING RIGHTS CASE Next month, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear two significant voting rights cases out of Arizona. The cases, Arizona Republican Party v.Democratic National CommitteeandBrnovich v. Democratic National Committee, involve an Arizona policy that requires voters who vote in person to do so in their assigned precincts and a state law that prohibits so-called “ballot harvesting,” in which mail ARTICLE IV: THE EXTRADITION CLAUSE Article IV: The Extradition Clause. A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to ARTICLE I, SECTION SEVEN The 'Travis Translation' of Article 1, Section 7: Clause 1: Any bill raising money (taxes) must begin in the House of Representatives, but the Senate must agree with it, just like any other bill. Clause 2: When a bill passes both the House and the Senate, the bill goes to BLOCKBURGER V UNITED STATES ESTABLISHED “SAME ELEMENTS In Blockburger v United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932), the U.S. Supreme Court clarified when two offenses are the same for purposes of Fifth Amendment’s Double Jeopardy Clause.Under the “same elements” test, a defendant may be convicted of two offenses arising out of the same criminal incident if each crime contains an element not found inthe other.
ABRAMS V. UNITED STATES: THE DISSENT THAT SHAPED FREE SPEECH Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes’ dissent in Abrams v.United States 250 U.S. 616 (1919) is widely regarded as one of the most famous dissents in the history of the U.S. Supreme Court. It sowed the seeds for the modern interpretation of freedom of speech under the First Amendment. BAKER V. NELSON: THE FORGOTTEN SAME-SEX MARRIAGE CASE The Facts of the Case in Baker v. Nelson. The case stemmed from a marriage application filed by two male University of Minnesota students. The clerk denied the application based on a state law that restricted marriage to “persons of the opposite sex.”. The couple then filed a lawsuit against the clerk, Gerald Nelson, assertingviolations of
CURRENT - CONSTITUTIONAL LAW REPORTER Constitutional Law Reporter RSS. Kent on 19th Century Damages Litigation against Federal Officers, Bivens, & Qualified Immunity - Legal Theory Blog. Date: 5/28/2021. Bueno de Mesquita, Kapilashrami, & Mason on Human Rights, Global Health Law, & COVID-19 - Legal TheoryBlog.
GRAHAM V CONNOR ESTABLISHED STANDARD FOR EXCESSIVE FORCE In Graham v.Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989), the U.S. Supreme Court established the legal framework for evaluating excessive force claims against law enforcement officers.Under the Court’s decision, courts must apply the objective reasonableness standard to the particular facts and circumstances of the case. SHAPIRO V THOMPSON ESTABLISHED 14TH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO TRAVEL In Shapiro v Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969), the U.S. Supreme Court recognized a constitutional right to travel from one state to another.It further held that state laws that imposed residency requirements to obtain welfare assistance violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.. Facts of Shapiro v Thompson. The Connecticut Welfare Department denied Vivian Marie ARTICLE IV: THE EXTRADITION CLAUSE Article IV: The Extradition Clause. A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to AMENDMENT 14: SECTION 5 The section of the 14th Amendment, similar to sections in several other amendments, is known as an “enforcement provision.”. It has no substantive law unto itself. Rather, it provides the authority for Congress to make laws to uphold the other provisions of the amendment. The text of the section is as follows: “The Congress shall have the (HISTORICAL) UNITED STATES V PETERS & THE POWER OF THE In United States v Peters, 9 U.S. 115 (1809), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the legislature of a State can’t annul the judgments, nor determine the jurisdiction, of the courts of the United States.The early Supreme Court decision strengthened the power of the federal courts. Facts of United States v Peters Philadelphia U.S. District Court Judge Richard Peters returned to the Supreme Court BAKER V. NELSON: THE FORGOTTEN SAME-SEX MARRIAGE CASE The Facts of the Case in Baker v. Nelson. The case stemmed from a marriage application filed by two male University of Minnesota students. The clerk denied the application based on a state law that restricted marriage to “persons of the opposite sex.”. The couple then filed a lawsuit against the clerk, Gerald Nelson, assertingviolations of
DE JONGE V. OREGON: THE RIGHT TO PEACEABLE ASSEMBLE In De Jonge v.Oregon, the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed that the right to peaceable assembly is equally as important as the freedom of speech and the freedom of the press.The decision also highlights that the right to engage in political discussion must be protected even when the government disagrees with the message.MORRISON V. OLSON
MORRISON v. OLSON 487 U.S. 654, 108 S.Ct. 2597, 101 L.Ed.2d 569 (1988) Chief Justice REHNQUIST delivered the opinion of the Court. This case presents us with a challenge to the independent counsel provisions ofthe Ethics
SAN ANTONIO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT V RODRIGUEZ (1973) In San Antonio Independent School District v Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1 (1973), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the right to education was not a fundamental right under the U.S. Constitution that triggered strict scrutiny. Accordingly, the Court held that San Antonio Independent School District’s school financing system did not run afoul of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. CURRENT - CONSTITUTIONAL LAW REPORTER Constitutional Law Reporter RSS. Kent on 19th Century Damages Litigation against Federal Officers, Bivens, & Qualified Immunity - Legal Theory Blog. Date: 5/28/2021. Bueno de Mesquita, Kapilashrami, & Mason on Human Rights, Global Health Law, & COVID-19 - Legal TheoryBlog.
JUSTICES REFUSE TO REQUIRE ISSUE EXHAUSTION OF SOCIAL The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held in Carr v. Saul, 593 U.S. ____ (2021), that the principles of issue exhaustion do not require Social Security disability claimants to argue at the agency level that the administrative law judges hearing their disability claims were unconstitutionally appointed. FOUR CASES ON THE DOCKET FOR SUPREME COURT THIS WEEK The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in four cases this week, all of which were originally scheduled to be heard last term. Issues before the justices included the statute of limitation for military rape charges, the Constitutional definition of “seizure,” and GRAHAM V CONNOR ESTABLISHED STANDARD FOR EXCESSIVE FORCE In Graham v.Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989), the U.S. Supreme Court established the legal framework for evaluating excessive force claims against law enforcement officers.Under the Court’s decision, courts must apply the objective reasonableness standard to the particular facts and circumstances of the case. SCOTUS TO HEAR POTENTIAL BLOCKBUSTER VOTING RIGHTS CASE Next month, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear two significant voting rights cases out of Arizona. The cases, Arizona Republican Party v.Democratic National CommitteeandBrnovich v. Democratic National Committee, involve an Arizona policy that requires voters who vote in person to do so in their assigned precincts and a state law that prohibits so-called “ballot harvesting,” in which mail ARTICLE IV: THE EXTRADITION CLAUSE Article IV: The Extradition Clause. A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to ARTICLE I, SECTION SEVEN The 'Travis Translation' of Article 1, Section 7: Clause 1: Any bill raising money (taxes) must begin in the House of Representatives, but the Senate must agree with it, just like any other bill. Clause 2: When a bill passes both the House and the Senate, the bill goes to BLOCKBURGER V UNITED STATES ESTABLISHED “SAME ELEMENTS In Blockburger v United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932), the U.S. Supreme Court clarified when two offenses are the same for purposes of Fifth Amendment’s Double Jeopardy Clause.Under the “same elements” test, a defendant may be convicted of two offenses arising out of the same criminal incident if each crime contains an element not found inthe other.
ABRAMS V. UNITED STATES: THE DISSENT THAT SHAPED FREE SPEECH Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes’ dissent in Abrams v.United States 250 U.S. 616 (1919) is widely regarded as one of the most famous dissents in the history of the U.S. Supreme Court. It sowed the seeds for the modern interpretation of freedom of speech under the First Amendment. BAKER V. NELSON: THE FORGOTTEN SAME-SEX MARRIAGE CASE The Facts of the Case in Baker v. Nelson. The case stemmed from a marriage application filed by two male University of Minnesota students. The clerk denied the application based on a state law that restricted marriage to “persons of the opposite sex.”. The couple then filed a lawsuit against the clerk, Gerald Nelson, assertingviolations of
CURRENT - CONSTITUTIONAL LAW REPORTER Constitutional Law Reporter RSS. Kent on 19th Century Damages Litigation against Federal Officers, Bivens, & Qualified Immunity - Legal Theory Blog. Date: 5/28/2021. Bueno de Mesquita, Kapilashrami, & Mason on Human Rights, Global Health Law, & COVID-19 - Legal TheoryBlog.
JUSTICES REFUSE TO REQUIRE ISSUE EXHAUSTION OF SOCIAL The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held in Carr v. Saul, 593 U.S. ____ (2021), that the principles of issue exhaustion do not require Social Security disability claimants to argue at the agency level that the administrative law judges hearing their disability claims were unconstitutionally appointed. FOUR CASES ON THE DOCKET FOR SUPREME COURT THIS WEEK The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in four cases this week, all of which were originally scheduled to be heard last term. Issues before the justices included the statute of limitation for military rape charges, the Constitutional definition of “seizure,” and GRAHAM V CONNOR ESTABLISHED STANDARD FOR EXCESSIVE FORCE In Graham v.Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989), the U.S. Supreme Court established the legal framework for evaluating excessive force claims against law enforcement officers.Under the Court’s decision, courts must apply the objective reasonableness standard to the particular facts and circumstances of the case. SCOTUS TO HEAR POTENTIAL BLOCKBUSTER VOTING RIGHTS CASE Next month, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear two significant voting rights cases out of Arizona. The cases, Arizona Republican Party v.Democratic National CommitteeandBrnovich v. Democratic National Committee, involve an Arizona policy that requires voters who vote in person to do so in their assigned precincts and a state law that prohibits so-called “ballot harvesting,” in which mail ARTICLE IV: THE EXTRADITION CLAUSE Article IV: The Extradition Clause. A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to ARTICLE I, SECTION SEVEN The 'Travis Translation' of Article 1, Section 7: Clause 1: Any bill raising money (taxes) must begin in the House of Representatives, but the Senate must agree with it, just like any other bill. Clause 2: When a bill passes both the House and the Senate, the bill goes to BLOCKBURGER V UNITED STATES ESTABLISHED “SAME ELEMENTS In Blockburger v United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932), the U.S. Supreme Court clarified when two offenses are the same for purposes of Fifth Amendment’s Double Jeopardy Clause.Under the “same elements” test, a defendant may be convicted of two offenses arising out of the same criminal incident if each crime contains an element not found inthe other.
ABRAMS V. UNITED STATES: THE DISSENT THAT SHAPED FREE SPEECH Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes’ dissent in Abrams v.United States 250 U.S. 616 (1919) is widely regarded as one of the most famous dissents in the history of the U.S. Supreme Court. It sowed the seeds for the modern interpretation of freedom of speech under the First Amendment. BAKER V. NELSON: THE FORGOTTEN SAME-SEX MARRIAGE CASE The Facts of the Case in Baker v. Nelson. The case stemmed from a marriage application filed by two male University of Minnesota students. The clerk denied the application based on a state law that restricted marriage to “persons of the opposite sex.”. The couple then filed a lawsuit against the clerk, Gerald Nelson, assertingviolations of
CURRENT - CONSTITUTIONAL LAW REPORTER Constitutional Law Reporter RSS. Kent on 19th Century Damages Litigation against Federal Officers, Bivens, & Qualified Immunity - Legal Theory Blog. Date: 5/28/2021. Bueno de Mesquita, Kapilashrami, & Mason on Human Rights, Global Health Law, & COVID-19 - Legal TheoryBlog.
GRAHAM V CONNOR ESTABLISHED STANDARD FOR EXCESSIVE FORCE In Graham v.Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989), the U.S. Supreme Court established the legal framework for evaluating excessive force claims against law enforcement officers.Under the Court’s decision, courts must apply the objective reasonableness standard to the particular facts and circumstances of the case. SHAPIRO V THOMPSON ESTABLISHED 14TH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO TRAVEL In Shapiro v Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969), the U.S. Supreme Court recognized a constitutional right to travel from one state to another.It further held that state laws that imposed residency requirements to obtain welfare assistance violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.. Facts of Shapiro v Thompson. The Connecticut Welfare Department denied Vivian Marie ARTICLE IV: THE EXTRADITION CLAUSE Article IV: The Extradition Clause. A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to AMENDMENT 14: SECTION 5 The section of the 14th Amendment, similar to sections in several other amendments, is known as an “enforcement provision.”. It has no substantive law unto itself. Rather, it provides the authority for Congress to make laws to uphold the other provisions of the amendment. The text of the section is as follows: “The Congress shall have the (HISTORICAL) UNITED STATES V PETERS & THE POWER OF THE In United States v Peters, 9 U.S. 115 (1809), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the legislature of a State can’t annul the judgments, nor determine the jurisdiction, of the courts of the United States.The early Supreme Court decision strengthened the power of the federal courts. Facts of United States v Peters Philadelphia U.S. District Court Judge Richard Peters returned to the Supreme Court BAKER V. NELSON: THE FORGOTTEN SAME-SEX MARRIAGE CASE The Facts of the Case in Baker v. Nelson. The case stemmed from a marriage application filed by two male University of Minnesota students. The clerk denied the application based on a state law that restricted marriage to “persons of the opposite sex.”. The couple then filed a lawsuit against the clerk, Gerald Nelson, assertingviolations of
DE JONGE V. OREGON: THE RIGHT TO PEACEABLE ASSEMBLE In De Jonge v.Oregon, the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed that the right to peaceable assembly is equally as important as the freedom of speech and the freedom of the press.The decision also highlights that the right to engage in political discussion must be protected even when the government disagrees with the message.MORRISON V. OLSON
MORRISON v. OLSON 487 U.S. 654, 108 S.Ct. 2597, 101 L.Ed.2d 569 (1988) Chief Justice REHNQUIST delivered the opinion of the Court. This case presents us with a challenge to the independent counsel provisions ofthe Ethics
SAN ANTONIO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT V RODRIGUEZ (1973) In San Antonio Independent School District v Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1 (1973), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the right to education was not a fundamental right under the U.S. Constitution that triggered strict scrutiny. Accordingly, the Court held that San Antonio Independent School District’s school financing system did not run afoul of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. CURRENT - CONSTITUTIONAL LAW REPORTER Constitutional Law Reporter RSS. Kent on 19th Century Damages Litigation against Federal Officers, Bivens, & Qualified Immunity - Legal Theory Blog. Date: 5/28/2021. Bueno de Mesquita, Kapilashrami, & Mason on Human Rights, Global Health Law, & COVID-19 - Legal TheoryBlog.
JUSTICES REFUSE TO REQUIRE ISSUE EXHAUSTION OF SOCIAL The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held in Carr v. Saul, 593 U.S. ____ (2021), that the principles of issue exhaustion do not require Social Security disability claimants to argue at the agency level that the administrative law judges hearing their disability claims were unconstitutionally appointed. FOUR CASES ON THE DOCKET FOR SUPREME COURT THIS WEEK The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in four cases this week, all of which were originally scheduled to be heard last term. Issues before the justices included the statute of limitation for military rape charges, the Constitutional definition of “seizure,” and SCOTUS RULES MINISTERIAL EXCEPTION BARS TEACHERSSEE MORE ON CONSTITUTIONALLAWREPORTER.COM ARTICLE IV: THE EXTRADITION CLAUSE Article IV: The Extradition Clause. A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to HELVERING V DAVIS (1937) UPHOLDS SOCIAL SECURITY PROGRAM In Helvering v Davis, 301 U.S. 619 (1937), the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Social Security Act of 1935.The Court ruled that the Social Security Program to provide old age benefits did not violate the Tenth Amendment because Congress is permitted to spend for the general welfare.MORRISON V. OLSON
MORRISON v. OLSON 487 U.S. 654, 108 S.Ct. 2597, 101 L.Ed.2d 569 (1988) Chief Justice REHNQUIST delivered the opinion of the Court. This case presents us with a challenge to the independent counsel provisions ofthe Ethics
JACKSON V. HOBBS: SUPREME COURT LIMITS SENTENCES FOR Jackson v. Hobbs: Supreme Court Limits Sentences for Youngest Offenders. Adults and children should be treated differently, even when it comes to the most serious crimes, according to the U.S. Supreme Court. In Jackson v. Hobbs, the justices held that requiring children convicted of murder to be sentenced to prison without possibility of parole FEDERAL JUDGE WEST HUMPHREYS IMPEACHED AFTER JOINING West H. Humphreys, who served as a judge for U.S. District Court for the Middle, Eastern, and Western Districts of Tennessee, was impeached in 1862 after he advocated in favor of succession and joined the Confederacy. He was the only federal official impeached during theCivil War.
GOLDBERG V KELLY
1 JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court, in which JUSTICES DOUGLAS, HARLAN, WHITE, MARSHALL, and BLACKMUN joined. CHIEF JUSTICE BURGER and JUSTICES STEWART and BLACK filed dissenting opinions. JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court. The question for decision is whether a State that ter-minates public assistance payments to a particular CURRENT - CONSTITUTIONAL LAW REPORTER Constitutional Law Reporter RSS. Kent on 19th Century Damages Litigation against Federal Officers, Bivens, & Qualified Immunity - Legal Theory Blog. Date: 5/28/2021. Bueno de Mesquita, Kapilashrami, & Mason on Human Rights, Global Health Law, & COVID-19 - Legal TheoryBlog.
JUSTICES REFUSE TO REQUIRE ISSUE EXHAUSTION OF SOCIAL The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held in Carr v. Saul, 593 U.S. ____ (2021), that the principles of issue exhaustion do not require Social Security disability claimants to argue at the agency level that the administrative law judges hearing their disability claims were unconstitutionally appointed. FOUR CASES ON THE DOCKET FOR SUPREME COURT THIS WEEK The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in four cases this week, all of which were originally scheduled to be heard last term. Issues before the justices included the statute of limitation for military rape charges, the Constitutional definition of “seizure,” and SCOTUS RULES MINISTERIAL EXCEPTION BARS TEACHERSSEE MORE ON CONSTITUTIONALLAWREPORTER.COM ARTICLE IV: THE EXTRADITION CLAUSE Article IV: The Extradition Clause. A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to HELVERING V DAVIS (1937) UPHOLDS SOCIAL SECURITY PROGRAM In Helvering v Davis, 301 U.S. 619 (1937), the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Social Security Act of 1935.The Court ruled that the Social Security Program to provide old age benefits did not violate the Tenth Amendment because Congress is permitted to spend for the general welfare.MORRISON V. OLSON
MORRISON v. OLSON 487 U.S. 654, 108 S.Ct. 2597, 101 L.Ed.2d 569 (1988) Chief Justice REHNQUIST delivered the opinion of the Court. This case presents us with a challenge to the independent counsel provisions ofthe Ethics
JACKSON V. HOBBS: SUPREME COURT LIMITS SENTENCES FOR Jackson v. Hobbs: Supreme Court Limits Sentences for Youngest Offenders. Adults and children should be treated differently, even when it comes to the most serious crimes, according to the U.S. Supreme Court. In Jackson v. Hobbs, the justices held that requiring children convicted of murder to be sentenced to prison without possibility of parole FEDERAL JUDGE WEST HUMPHREYS IMPEACHED AFTER JOINING West H. Humphreys, who served as a judge for U.S. District Court for the Middle, Eastern, and Western Districts of Tennessee, was impeached in 1862 after he advocated in favor of succession and joined the Confederacy. He was the only federal official impeached during theCivil War.
GOLDBERG V KELLY
1 JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court, in which JUSTICES DOUGLAS, HARLAN, WHITE, MARSHALL, and BLACKMUN joined. CHIEF JUSTICE BURGER and JUSTICES STEWART and BLACK filed dissenting opinions. JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court. The question for decision is whether a State that ter-minates public assistance payments to a particular EXCEPTION CAN’T JUSTIFY WARRANTLESS SEARCHES OF HOMES In Caniglia v.Strom, 593 U. S. ____ (2021), the U.S. Supreme Court held that a warrantless search of the Edward Caniglia’s home could not be justified under the “community caretaking” exception to the Fourth Amendment.According to the Court, neither the holding nor logic of Cady v. Dombrowski justified the removal of Caniglia’s firearms from his home by police officers conducting a ARTICLE IV: THE EXTRADITION CLAUSE Article IV: The Extradition Clause. A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to CORFIELD V. CORYELL: THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES CLAUSE In Corfield v.Coryell, 6 F. Cas. 546 (1823), Supreme Court Justice Bushrod Washington interprets the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article 4, Section 2 and articulates a list of fundamental rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.. Although he authored the opinion while sitting as a circuit judge, this early reference to fundamental rights not expressly stated in the Constitution ABRAMS V. UNITED STATES: THE DISSENT THAT SHAPED FREE SPEECH Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes’ dissent in Abrams v.United States 250 U.S. 616 (1919) is widely regarded as one of the most famous dissents in the history of the U.S. Supreme Court. It sowed the seeds for the modern interpretation of freedom of speech under the First Amendment.MORRISON V. OLSON
MORRISON v. OLSON 487 U.S. 654, 108 S.Ct. 2597, 101 L.Ed.2d 569 (1988) Chief Justice REHNQUIST delivered the opinion of the Court. This case presents us with a challenge to the independent counsel provisions ofthe Ethics
UNITED STATES V BALLARD AND SINCERELY HELD RELIGIOUS BELIEFS In United States v Ballard, 322 U.S. 78 (1944), the U.S. Supreme Court held that whether a religious belief is true or false should not be taken into consideration under the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause.The decision solidified the Court’s First Amendment precedent holding that courts should seek to avoid intervening in religiouscontroversies.
DEAN V UNITED STATES PRESERVES FLEXIBILITY IN MANDATORY In Dean v United States, 581 U. S. ____ (2017), the U.S. Supreme Court held that district courts have the discretion to determine whether a defendant has already been given a mandatory sentence for one crime when considering an appropriate sentence for another charge. The Court’s criminal sentencing decision was unanimous. Facts of Dean vUnited States
CHARMING BETSY AND THE LAW OF NATIONS In Murray v.Schooner Charming Betsy 6 U.S.64, 2 L.Ed.208 (1804), Chief Justice John Marshall stated that “an act of Congress ought never to be construed to violate the law of nations if any other possible construction remains.” This early Supreme Court decision creates authority for a rule of statutory construction encouraging American Courts to interpret U.S. law consistent with JAMES FRANCIS BYRNES (SC) James Francis Byrnes was born on May 2, 1879 in Charleston, South Carolina. Byrnes’ father died before he was born, and he was raised by his mother, who was a dressmaker. He left school at the age of fourteen to begin working in a law office. Eventually, he became a court stenographer. Byrnes went on to apprentice as a lawyer and thenhe sat
BAKER V. NELSON: THE FORGOTTEN SAME-SEX MARRIAGE CASE The Facts of the Case in Baker v. Nelson. The case stemmed from a marriage application filed by two male University of Minnesota students. The clerk denied the application based on a state law that restricted marriage to “persons of the opposite sex.”. The couple then filed a lawsuit against the clerk, Gerald Nelson, assertingviolations of
CURRENT - CONSTITUTIONAL LAW REPORTER Constitutional Law Reporter RSS. Kent on 19th Century Damages Litigation against Federal Officers, Bivens, & Qualified Immunity - Legal Theory Blog. Date: 5/28/2021. Bueno de Mesquita, Kapilashrami, & Mason on Human Rights, Global Health Law, & COVID-19 - Legal TheoryBlog.
FOUR CASES ON THE DOCKET FOR SUPREME COURT THIS WEEK The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in four cases this week, all of which were originally scheduled to be heard last term. Issues before the justices included the statute of limitation for military rape charges, the Constitutional definition of “seizure,” and SHAPIRO V THOMPSON ESTABLISHED 14TH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO TRAVEL In Shapiro v Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969), the U.S. Supreme Court recognized a constitutional right to travel from one state to another.It further held that state laws that imposed residency requirements to obtain welfare assistance violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.. Facts of Shapiro v Thompson. The Connecticut Welfare Department denied Vivian Marie ARTICLE IV: THE EXTRADITION CLAUSE Article IV: The Extradition Clause. A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to ARTICLE I, SECTION TEN: LIMITATIONS ON THE STATES The 'Travis Translation' of Article 1, Section 10: Clause 1: No state can ally with another country; make war; make their own money; allow private boats and vessels to catch and arrest enemy ships; or issue their own bills for credit. States must make only silver and gold to pay for things. States cannot pass any law to disgrace people accused HELVERING V DAVIS (1937) UPHOLDS SOCIAL SECURITY PROGRAM In Helvering v Davis, 301 U.S. 619 (1937), the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Social Security Act of 1935.The Court ruled that the Social Security Program to provide old age benefits did not violate the Tenth Amendment because Congress is permitted to spend for the general welfare. STATE-ACTORS SUBJECT TO THE FIRST AMENDMENT IN MANHATTAN In Manhattan Community Access Corp v Halleck, 587 U.S. ___ (2019), the U.S. Supreme Court held that Manhattan Community Access Corp., a private nonprofit corporation designated by New York City to operate public access channels on the Time Warner-owned Manhattan cable system, is not a state actor subject to the First Amendment.The Court split 5-4 along ideological lines. INTERNATIONAL SHOE ESTABLISHES MINIMUM CONTACTS TEST In International Shoe Co. v. State of Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945), the U.S. Supreme Court first established the minimum contacts test for determining whether a corporation is subject to the jurisdiction of a state court.Under the Court’s holding, the Constitution’s Due Process only requires that corporations have sufficient minimum contacts with the forum state so as to comply with the FEDERAL JUDGE WEST HUMPHREYS IMPEACHED AFTER JOINING West H. Humphreys, who served as a judge for U.S. District Court for the Middle, Eastern, and Western Districts of Tennessee, was impeached in 1862 after he advocated in favor of succession and joined the Confederacy. He was the only federal official impeached during theCivil War.
GOLDBERG V KELLY
1 JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court, in which JUSTICES DOUGLAS, HARLAN, WHITE, MARSHALL, and BLACKMUN joined. CHIEF JUSTICE BURGER and JUSTICES STEWART and BLACK filed dissenting opinions. JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court. The question for decision is whether a State that ter-minates public assistance payments to a particular CURRENT - CONSTITUTIONAL LAW REPORTER Constitutional Law Reporter RSS. Kent on 19th Century Damages Litigation against Federal Officers, Bivens, & Qualified Immunity - Legal Theory Blog. Date: 5/28/2021. Bueno de Mesquita, Kapilashrami, & Mason on Human Rights, Global Health Law, & COVID-19 - Legal TheoryBlog.
FOUR CASES ON THE DOCKET FOR SUPREME COURT THIS WEEK The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in four cases this week, all of which were originally scheduled to be heard last term. Issues before the justices included the statute of limitation for military rape charges, the Constitutional definition of “seizure,” and SHAPIRO V THOMPSON ESTABLISHED 14TH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO TRAVEL In Shapiro v Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969), the U.S. Supreme Court recognized a constitutional right to travel from one state to another.It further held that state laws that imposed residency requirements to obtain welfare assistance violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.. Facts of Shapiro v Thompson. The Connecticut Welfare Department denied Vivian Marie ARTICLE IV: THE EXTRADITION CLAUSE Article IV: The Extradition Clause. A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to ARTICLE I, SECTION TEN: LIMITATIONS ON THE STATES The 'Travis Translation' of Article 1, Section 10: Clause 1: No state can ally with another country; make war; make their own money; allow private boats and vessels to catch and arrest enemy ships; or issue their own bills for credit. States must make only silver and gold to pay for things. States cannot pass any law to disgrace people accused HELVERING V DAVIS (1937) UPHOLDS SOCIAL SECURITY PROGRAM In Helvering v Davis, 301 U.S. 619 (1937), the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Social Security Act of 1935.The Court ruled that the Social Security Program to provide old age benefits did not violate the Tenth Amendment because Congress is permitted to spend for the general welfare. STATE-ACTORS SUBJECT TO THE FIRST AMENDMENT IN MANHATTAN In Manhattan Community Access Corp v Halleck, 587 U.S. ___ (2019), the U.S. Supreme Court held that Manhattan Community Access Corp., a private nonprofit corporation designated by New York City to operate public access channels on the Time Warner-owned Manhattan cable system, is not a state actor subject to the First Amendment.The Court split 5-4 along ideological lines. INTERNATIONAL SHOE ESTABLISHES MINIMUM CONTACTS TEST In International Shoe Co. v. State of Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945), the U.S. Supreme Court first established the minimum contacts test for determining whether a corporation is subject to the jurisdiction of a state court.Under the Court’s holding, the Constitution’s Due Process only requires that corporations have sufficient minimum contacts with the forum state so as to comply with the FEDERAL JUDGE WEST HUMPHREYS IMPEACHED AFTER JOINING West H. Humphreys, who served as a judge for U.S. District Court for the Middle, Eastern, and Western Districts of Tennessee, was impeached in 1862 after he advocated in favor of succession and joined the Confederacy. He was the only federal official impeached during theCivil War.
GOLDBERG V KELLY
1 JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court, in which JUSTICES DOUGLAS, HARLAN, WHITE, MARSHALL, and BLACKMUN joined. CHIEF JUSTICE BURGER and JUSTICES STEWART and BLACK filed dissenting opinions. JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court. The question for decision is whether a State that ter-minates public assistance payments to a particular EXCEPTION CAN’T JUSTIFY WARRANTLESS SEARCHES OF HOMES In Caniglia v.Strom, 593 U. S. ____ (2021), the U.S. Supreme Court held that a warrantless search of the Edward Caniglia’s home could not be justified under the “community caretaking” exception to the Fourth Amendment.According to the Court, neither the holding nor logic of Cady v. Dombrowski justified the removal of Caniglia’s firearms from his home by police officers conducting a JUSTICES REFUSE TO REQUIRE ISSUE EXHAUSTION OF SOCIAL The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held in Carr v. Saul, 593 U.S. ____ (2021), that the principles of issue exhaustion do not require Social Security disability claimants to argue at the agency level that the administrative law judges hearing their disability claims were unconstitutionally appointed.HILLARY CLINTON
Hillary Rodham was born on October 26, 1947, in Chicago. Illinois. She grew up in Park Ridge, a suburb of Chicago. She was a good student and an active child, participating in activities ranging from softball toGirl Scouts.
ARTICLE IV: THE EXTRADITION CLAUSE Article IV: The Extradition Clause. A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to SCOTUS FAILS TO REACH MERITS OF SECOND AMENDMENT CASE SCOTUS Fails to Reach Merits of Second Amendment Case. The U.S. Supreme Court failed to reach the merits in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. City of New York . However, there are signs that justices are interested in taking on Second Amendment rights. SCOTUS RULES MINISTERIAL EXCEPTION BARS TEACHERS In Our Lady of Guadalupe School v.Morrissey-Berru and St. James School v. Biel, 591 U. S. ____ (2020), the U.S. Supreme Court held that two Catholic school teachers could not pursue claims under federal anti-discrimination laws.According to the seven-member majority, the “ministerial exception” under the religion clauses of the First Amendment foreclosed the adjudication of the teachers ARTICLE II - SECTION 1 - CONSTITUTIONAL LAW REPORTER The 'Travis Translation' of Article 2, Section 1: Clause 1: The leader of the country will be the President of the United States. The President will be elected every four years, along with a Vice President, like this: Clause 2: The legislature of each state decides how that state will name a number of people called “Electors.”. SCOTUS ISSUES MAJOR TRIBAL RIGHTS RULING IN MCGIRT V. OKLAHOMA In McGirt v.Oklahoma, 591 U.S. ____ (2020), a divided U.S. Supreme Court held that much of eastern Oklahoma remains an American Indian reservation for the purposes of federal criminal jurisdiction.. Facts of the Case. The Major Crimes Act (MCA) provides that, within “the Indian country,” “ny Indian who commits” certain enumerated offenses “shall be subject to the same law and CORFIELD V. CORYELL: THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES CLAUSE In Corfield v.Coryell, 6 F. Cas. 546 (1823), Supreme Court Justice Bushrod Washington interprets the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article 4, Section 2 and articulates a list of fundamental rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.. Although he authored the opinion while sitting as a circuit judge, this early reference to fundamental rights not expressly stated in the Constitution DE JONGE V. OREGON: THE RIGHT TO PEACEABLE ASSEMBLE In De Jonge v.Oregon, the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed that the right to peaceable assembly is equally as important as the freedom of speech and the freedom of the press.The decision also highlights that the right to engage in political discussion must be protected even when the government disagrees with the message. CURRENT - CONSTITUTIONAL LAW REPORTER Constitutional Law Reporter RSS. Kent on 19th Century Damages Litigation against Federal Officers, Bivens, & Qualified Immunity - Legal Theory Blog. Date: 5/28/2021. Bueno de Mesquita, Kapilashrami, & Mason on Human Rights, Global Health Law, & COVID-19 - Legal TheoryBlog.
FOUR CASES ON THE DOCKET FOR SUPREME COURT THIS WEEK The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in four cases this week, all of which were originally scheduled to be heard last term. Issues before the justices included the statute of limitation for military rape charges, the Constitutional definition of “seizure,” and SHAPIRO V THOMPSON ESTABLISHED 14TH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO TRAVEL In Shapiro v Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969), the U.S. Supreme Court recognized a constitutional right to travel from one state to another.It further held that state laws that imposed residency requirements to obtain welfare assistance violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.. Facts of Shapiro v Thompson. The Connecticut Welfare Department denied Vivian Marie ARTICLE IV: THE EXTRADITION CLAUSE Article IV: The Extradition Clause. A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to ARTICLE I, SECTION TEN: LIMITATIONS ON THE STATES The 'Travis Translation' of Article 1, Section 10: Clause 1: No state can ally with another country; make war; make their own money; allow private boats and vessels to catch and arrest enemy ships; or issue their own bills for credit. States must make only silver and gold to pay for things. States cannot pass any law to disgrace people accused HELVERING V DAVIS (1937) UPHOLDS SOCIAL SECURITY PROGRAMCONSTITUTIONALITY OF SOCIAL SECURITYGREGORY V HELVERING CASE BRIEFSOCIAL SECURITY IS UNCONSTITUTIONALSTEWARD MACHINE V DAVIS In Helvering v Davis, 301 U.S. 619 (1937), the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Social Security Act of 1935.The Court ruled that the Social Security Program to provide old age benefits did not violate the Tenth Amendment because Congress is permitted to spend for the general welfare. STATE-ACTORS SUBJECT TO THE FIRST AMENDMENT IN MANHATTAN In Manhattan Community Access Corp v Halleck, 587 U.S. ___ (2019), the U.S. Supreme Court held that Manhattan Community Access Corp., a private nonprofit corporation designated by New York City to operate public access channels on the Time Warner-owned Manhattan cable system, is not a state actor subject to the First Amendment.The Court split 5-4 along ideological lines. INTERNATIONAL SHOE ESTABLISHES MINIMUM CONTACTS TEST In International Shoe Co. v. State of Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945), the U.S. Supreme Court first established the minimum contacts test for determining whether a corporation is subject to the jurisdiction of a state court.Under the Court’s holding, the Constitution’s Due Process only requires that corporations have sufficient minimum contacts with the forum state so as to comply with the FEDERAL JUDGE WEST HUMPHREYS IMPEACHED AFTER JOINING West H. Humphreys, who served as a judge for U.S. District Court for the Middle, Eastern, and Western Districts of Tennessee, was impeached in 1862 after he advocated in favor of succession and joined the Confederacy. He was the only federal official impeached during theCivil War.
GOLDBERG V KELLY
1 JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court, in which JUSTICES DOUGLAS, HARLAN, WHITE, MARSHALL, and BLACKMUN joined. CHIEF JUSTICE BURGER and JUSTICES STEWART and BLACK filed dissenting opinions. JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court. The question for decision is whether a State that ter-minates public assistance payments to a particular CURRENT - CONSTITUTIONAL LAW REPORTER Constitutional Law Reporter RSS. Kent on 19th Century Damages Litigation against Federal Officers, Bivens, & Qualified Immunity - Legal Theory Blog. Date: 5/28/2021. Bueno de Mesquita, Kapilashrami, & Mason on Human Rights, Global Health Law, & COVID-19 - Legal TheoryBlog.
FOUR CASES ON THE DOCKET FOR SUPREME COURT THIS WEEK The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in four cases this week, all of which were originally scheduled to be heard last term. Issues before the justices included the statute of limitation for military rape charges, the Constitutional definition of “seizure,” and SHAPIRO V THOMPSON ESTABLISHED 14TH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO TRAVEL In Shapiro v Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969), the U.S. Supreme Court recognized a constitutional right to travel from one state to another.It further held that state laws that imposed residency requirements to obtain welfare assistance violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.. Facts of Shapiro v Thompson. The Connecticut Welfare Department denied Vivian Marie ARTICLE IV: THE EXTRADITION CLAUSE Article IV: The Extradition Clause. A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to ARTICLE I, SECTION TEN: LIMITATIONS ON THE STATES The 'Travis Translation' of Article 1, Section 10: Clause 1: No state can ally with another country; make war; make their own money; allow private boats and vessels to catch and arrest enemy ships; or issue their own bills for credit. States must make only silver and gold to pay for things. States cannot pass any law to disgrace people accused HELVERING V DAVIS (1937) UPHOLDS SOCIAL SECURITY PROGRAMCONSTITUTIONALITY OF SOCIAL SECURITYGREGORY V HELVERING CASE BRIEFSOCIAL SECURITY IS UNCONSTITUTIONALSTEWARD MACHINE V DAVIS In Helvering v Davis, 301 U.S. 619 (1937), the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Social Security Act of 1935.The Court ruled that the Social Security Program to provide old age benefits did not violate the Tenth Amendment because Congress is permitted to spend for the general welfare. STATE-ACTORS SUBJECT TO THE FIRST AMENDMENT IN MANHATTAN In Manhattan Community Access Corp v Halleck, 587 U.S. ___ (2019), the U.S. Supreme Court held that Manhattan Community Access Corp., a private nonprofit corporation designated by New York City to operate public access channels on the Time Warner-owned Manhattan cable system, is not a state actor subject to the First Amendment.The Court split 5-4 along ideological lines. INTERNATIONAL SHOE ESTABLISHES MINIMUM CONTACTS TEST In International Shoe Co. v. State of Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945), the U.S. Supreme Court first established the minimum contacts test for determining whether a corporation is subject to the jurisdiction of a state court.Under the Court’s holding, the Constitution’s Due Process only requires that corporations have sufficient minimum contacts with the forum state so as to comply with the FEDERAL JUDGE WEST HUMPHREYS IMPEACHED AFTER JOINING West H. Humphreys, who served as a judge for U.S. District Court for the Middle, Eastern, and Western Districts of Tennessee, was impeached in 1862 after he advocated in favor of succession and joined the Confederacy. He was the only federal official impeached during theCivil War.
GOLDBERG V KELLY
1 JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court, in which JUSTICES DOUGLAS, HARLAN, WHITE, MARSHALL, and BLACKMUN joined. CHIEF JUSTICE BURGER and JUSTICES STEWART and BLACK filed dissenting opinions. JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court. The question for decision is whether a State that ter-minates public assistance payments to a particular EXCEPTION CAN’T JUSTIFY WARRANTLESS SEARCHES OF HOMES In Caniglia v.Strom, 593 U. S. ____ (2021), the U.S. Supreme Court held that a warrantless search of the Edward Caniglia’s home could not be justified under the “community caretaking” exception to the Fourth Amendment.According to the Court, neither the holding nor logic of Cady v. Dombrowski justified the removal of Caniglia’s firearms from his home by police officers conducting a JUSTICES REFUSE TO REQUIRE ISSUE EXHAUSTION OF SOCIAL The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held in Carr v. Saul, 593 U.S. ____ (2021), that the principles of issue exhaustion do not require Social Security disability claimants to argue at the agency level that the administrative law judges hearing their disability claims were unconstitutionally appointed.HILLARY CLINTON
Hillary Rodham was born on October 26, 1947, in Chicago. Illinois. She grew up in Park Ridge, a suburb of Chicago. She was a good student and an active child, participating in activities ranging from softball toGirl Scouts.
ARTICLE IV: THE EXTRADITION CLAUSE Article IV: The Extradition Clause. A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to SCOTUS FAILS TO REACH MERITS OF SECOND AMENDMENT CASE SCOTUS Fails to Reach Merits of Second Amendment Case. The U.S. Supreme Court failed to reach the merits in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. City of New York . However, there are signs that justices are interested in taking on Second Amendment rights. SCOTUS RULES MINISTERIAL EXCEPTION BARS TEACHERS In Our Lady of Guadalupe School v.Morrissey-Berru and St. James School v. Biel, 591 U. S. ____ (2020), the U.S. Supreme Court held that two Catholic school teachers could not pursue claims under federal anti-discrimination laws.According to the seven-member majority, the “ministerial exception” under the religion clauses of the First Amendment foreclosed the adjudication of the teachers ARTICLE II - SECTION 1 - CONSTITUTIONAL LAW REPORTER The 'Travis Translation' of Article 2, Section 1: Clause 1: The leader of the country will be the President of the United States. The President will be elected every four years, along with a Vice President, like this: Clause 2: The legislature of each state decides how that state will name a number of people called “Electors.”. SCOTUS ISSUES MAJOR TRIBAL RIGHTS RULING IN MCGIRT V. OKLAHOMA In McGirt v.Oklahoma, 591 U.S. ____ (2020), a divided U.S. Supreme Court held that much of eastern Oklahoma remains an American Indian reservation for the purposes of federal criminal jurisdiction.. Facts of the Case. The Major Crimes Act (MCA) provides that, within “the Indian country,” “ny Indian who commits” certain enumerated offenses “shall be subject to the same law and CORFIELD V. CORYELL: THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES CLAUSE In Corfield v.Coryell, 6 F. Cas. 546 (1823), Supreme Court Justice Bushrod Washington interprets the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article 4, Section 2 and articulates a list of fundamental rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.. Although he authored the opinion while sitting as a circuit judge, this early reference to fundamental rights not expressly stated in the Constitution DE JONGE V. OREGON: THE RIGHT TO PEACEABLE ASSEMBLE In De Jonge v.Oregon, the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed that the right to peaceable assembly is equally as important as the freedom of speech and the freedom of the press.The decision also highlights that the right to engage in political discussion must be protected even when the government disagrees with the message. CURRENT - CONSTITUTIONAL LAW REPORTER Preamble to the Bill of Rights. Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine. SHAPIRO V THOMPSON ESTABLISHED 14TH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO TRAVEL In Shapiro v Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969), the U.S. Supreme Court recognized a constitutional right to travel from one state to another.It further held that state laws that imposed residency requirements to obtain welfare assistance violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.. Facts of Shapiro v Thompson. The Connecticut Welfare Department denied Vivian Marie FOUR CASES ON THE DOCKET FOR SUPREME COURT THIS WEEK The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in four cases this week, all of which were originally scheduled to be heard last term. Issues before the justices included the statute of limitation for military rape charges, the Constitutional definition of “seizure,” and ARTICLE IV: THE EXTRADITION CLAUSE The Extradition Clause is yet another provision which normalizes legal processes among the states. In this clause, the Constitution requires that if a person is charged with a crime in one state and flees to another, the harboring state must return the individual to thecharging state.
ARTICLE I, SECTION TEN: LIMITATIONS ON THE STATES No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any HELVERING V DAVIS (1937) UPHOLDS SOCIAL SECURITY PROGRAMCONSTITUTIONALITY OF SOCIAL SECURITYGREGORY V HELVERING CASE BRIEFSOCIAL SECURITY IS UNCONSTITUTIONALSTEWARD MACHINE V DAVIS In Helvering v Davis, 301 U.S. 619 (1937), the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Social Security Act of 1935.The Court ruled that the Social Security Program to provide old age benefits did not violate the Tenth Amendment because Congress is permitted to spend for the general welfare. STATE-ACTORS SUBJECT TO THE FIRST AMENDMENT IN MANHATTAN In Manhattan Community Access Corp v Halleck, 587 U.S. ___ (2019), the U.S. Supreme Court held that Manhattan Community Access Corp., a private nonprofit corporation designated by New York City to operate public access channels on the Time Warner-owned Manhattan cable system, is not a state actor subject to the First Amendment.The Court split 5-4 along ideological lines. INTERNATIONAL SHOE ESTABLISHES MINIMUM CONTACTS TEST In International Shoe Co. v. State of Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945), the U.S. Supreme Court first established the minimum contacts test for determining whether a corporation is subject to the jurisdiction of a state court.Under the Court’s holding, the Constitution’s Due Process only requires that corporations have sufficient minimum contacts with the forum state so as to comply with the FEDERAL JUDGE WEST HUMPHREYS IMPEACHED AFTER JOINING West H. Humphreys, who served as a judge for U.S. District Court for the Middle, Eastern, and Western Districts of Tennessee, was impeached in 1862 after he advocated in favor of succession and joined the Confederacy. He was the only federal official impeached during theCivil War.
GOLDBERG V KELLY
1 JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court, in which JUSTICES DOUGLAS, HARLAN, WHITE, MARSHALL, and BLACKMUN joined. CHIEF JUSTICE BURGER and JUSTICES STEWART and BLACK filed dissenting opinions. JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court. The question for decision is whether a State that ter-minates public assistance payments to a particular CURRENT - CONSTITUTIONAL LAW REPORTER Preamble to the Bill of Rights. Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine. SHAPIRO V THOMPSON ESTABLISHED 14TH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO TRAVEL In Shapiro v Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969), the U.S. Supreme Court recognized a constitutional right to travel from one state to another.It further held that state laws that imposed residency requirements to obtain welfare assistance violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.. Facts of Shapiro v Thompson. The Connecticut Welfare Department denied Vivian Marie FOUR CASES ON THE DOCKET FOR SUPREME COURT THIS WEEK The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in four cases this week, all of which were originally scheduled to be heard last term. Issues before the justices included the statute of limitation for military rape charges, the Constitutional definition of “seizure,” and ARTICLE IV: THE EXTRADITION CLAUSE The Extradition Clause is yet another provision which normalizes legal processes among the states. In this clause, the Constitution requires that if a person is charged with a crime in one state and flees to another, the harboring state must return the individual to thecharging state.
ARTICLE I, SECTION TEN: LIMITATIONS ON THE STATES No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any HELVERING V DAVIS (1937) UPHOLDS SOCIAL SECURITY PROGRAMCONSTITUTIONALITY OF SOCIAL SECURITYGREGORY V HELVERING CASE BRIEFSOCIAL SECURITY IS UNCONSTITUTIONALSTEWARD MACHINE V DAVIS In Helvering v Davis, 301 U.S. 619 (1937), the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Social Security Act of 1935.The Court ruled that the Social Security Program to provide old age benefits did not violate the Tenth Amendment because Congress is permitted to spend for the general welfare. STATE-ACTORS SUBJECT TO THE FIRST AMENDMENT IN MANHATTAN In Manhattan Community Access Corp v Halleck, 587 U.S. ___ (2019), the U.S. Supreme Court held that Manhattan Community Access Corp., a private nonprofit corporation designated by New York City to operate public access channels on the Time Warner-owned Manhattan cable system, is not a state actor subject to the First Amendment.The Court split 5-4 along ideological lines. INTERNATIONAL SHOE ESTABLISHES MINIMUM CONTACTS TEST In International Shoe Co. v. State of Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945), the U.S. Supreme Court first established the minimum contacts test for determining whether a corporation is subject to the jurisdiction of a state court.Under the Court’s holding, the Constitution’s Due Process only requires that corporations have sufficient minimum contacts with the forum state so as to comply with the FEDERAL JUDGE WEST HUMPHREYS IMPEACHED AFTER JOINING West H. Humphreys, who served as a judge for U.S. District Court for the Middle, Eastern, and Western Districts of Tennessee, was impeached in 1862 after he advocated in favor of succession and joined the Confederacy. He was the only federal official impeached during theCivil War.
GOLDBERG V KELLY
1 JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court, in which JUSTICES DOUGLAS, HARLAN, WHITE, MARSHALL, and BLACKMUN joined. CHIEF JUSTICE BURGER and JUSTICES STEWART and BLACK filed dissenting opinions. JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court. The question for decision is whether a State that ter-minates public assistance payments to a particular EXCEPTION CAN’T JUSTIFY WARRANTLESS SEARCHES OF HOMES In Caniglia v.Strom, 593 U. S. ____ (2021), the U.S. Supreme Court held that a warrantless search of the Edward Caniglia’s home could not be justified under the “community caretaking” exception to the Fourth Amendment.According to the Court, neither the holding nor logic of Cady v. Dombrowski justified the removal of Caniglia’s firearms from his home by police officers conducting a JUSTICES REFUSE TO REQUIRE ISSUE EXHAUSTION OF SOCIAL The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held in Carr v. Saul, 593 U.S. ____ (2021), that the principles of issue exhaustion do not require Social Security disability claimants to argue at the agency level that the administrative law judges hearing their disability claims were unconstitutionally appointed.HILLARY CLINTON
Hillary Rodham was born on October 26, 1947, in Chicago. Illinois. She grew up in Park Ridge, a suburb of Chicago. She was a good student and an active child, participating in activities ranging from softball toGirl Scouts.
ARTICLE IV: THE EXTRADITION CLAUSE The Extradition Clause is yet another provision which normalizes legal processes among the states. In this clause, the Constitution requires that if a person is charged with a crime in one state and flees to another, the harboring state must return the individual to thecharging state.
SCOTUS FAILS TO REACH MERITS OF SECOND AMENDMENT CASE The U.S. Supreme Court failed to reach the merits in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. City of New York. However, there are signs that justices are interested in taking on Second Amendmentrights.
SCOTUS RULES MINISTERIAL EXCEPTION BARS TEACHERS In Our Lady of Guadalupe School v.Morrissey-Berru and St. James School v. Biel, 591 U. S. ____ (2020), the U.S. Supreme Court held that two Catholic school teachers could not pursue claims under federal anti-discrimination laws.According to the seven-member majority, the “ministerial exception” under the religion clauses of the First Amendment foreclosed the adjudication of the teachers ARTICLE II - SECTION 1 - CONSTITUTIONAL LAW REPORTER Article II Section 1 defines the formation and functioning of the Executive branch. In-depth analysis, caselaw, and historical context. SCOTUS ISSUES MAJOR TRIBAL RIGHTS RULING IN MCGIRT V. OKLAHOMA In McGirt v.Oklahoma, 591 U.S. ____ (2020), a divided U.S. Supreme Court held that much of eastern Oklahoma remains an American Indian reservation for the purposes of federal criminal jurisdiction.. Facts of the Case. The Major Crimes Act (MCA) provides that, within “the Indian country,” “ny Indian who commits” certain enumerated offenses “shall be subject to the same law and CORFIELD V. CORYELL: THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES CLAUSE In Corfield v.Coryell, 6 F. Cas. 546 (1823), Supreme Court Justice Bushrod Washington interprets the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article 4, Section 2 and articulates a list of fundamental rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.. Although he authored the opinion while sitting as a circuit judge, this early reference to fundamental rights not expressly stated in the Constitution DE JONGE V. OREGON: THE RIGHT TO PEACEABLE ASSEMBLE In De Jonge v.Oregon, the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed that the right to peaceable assembly is equally as important as the freedom of speech and the freedom of the press.The decision also highlights that the right to engage in political discussion must be protected even when the government disagrees with the message.Menu_▼_
* Home
* US Constitution
* Supreme Court Cases* Justices
* Chief Supreme Court Justices * Current Supreme Court Justices * Past US Supreme Court Justices_▼_
* American Biographies* General
* Presidents
* Vice-Presidents
_▼_
* Articles
* Current Cases
* Historical Cases
* Impeachment
_▼_ * Videos
* Links
Hot-Topics
June 4, 2021 | Justices Refuse to Require Issue Exhaustion of SocialSecurity Claimant
Search Site
JUSTICES REFUSE TO REQUIRE ISSUE EXHAUSTION OF SOCIAL SECURITYCLAIMANT
The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held in Carr v. Saul, 593 U.S. ____ (2021), that the principles of issue exhaustion do not requireSocial Security...
Read More
prev
next
CHIEF JUSTICES
WILLIAM HOWARD TAFT
William Howard Taft lived between 1857 and 1930, and was ...Read More
EDWARD DOUGLASS WHITE, JR. Edward Douglass White lived between 1844 and 1921, and...Read More
MORRISON REMICK WAITE Morrison Remick Waite lived between 1816 and 1888, and...Read More
NEIL GORSUCH
Neil Gorsuch currently serves as an Associate Justice on ...Read More
EARL WARREN
Earl Warren lived between 1891 and 1974, and was a pro...Read More
CHARLES EVANS HUGHES Charles Evans Hughes lived from 1862 to 1948, serving ...Read More
MELVILLE WESTON FULLER Melville Weston Fuller lived between 1833 and 1910, and s...Read More
SALMON P. CHASE
Salmon Portland Chase (1864-1873) held several politic...Read More
JOHN ROBERTS
John Roberts was born in 1955 and is currently serving...Read More
WILLIAM REHNQUIST
William Rehnquist lived between 1924 and 2005, and ser...Read More
WARREN E. BURGER
Warren Burger lived between 1907 and 1995. During his ...Read More
FREDERICK MOORE VINSON Frederick Moore Vinson lived between 1890 and 1953, an...Read More
HARLAN FISKE STONE
Harlan Fiske Stone lived between 1872 and 1946. Stone ...Read More
WILLIAM HOWARD TAFT
William Howard Taft lived between 1857 and 1930, and was ...Read More
EDWARD DOUGLASS WHITE, JR. Edward Douglass White lived between 1844 and 1921, and...Read More
MORRISON REMICK WAITE Morrison Remick Waite lived between 1816 and 1888, and...Read More
NEIL GORSUCH
Neil Gorsuch currently serves as an Associate Justice on ...Read More
EARL WARREN
Earl Warren lived between 1891 and 1974, and was a pro...Read More
CHARLES EVANS HUGHES Charles Evans Hughes lived from 1862 to 1948, serving ...Read More
prev
next
SUPREME COURT JUSTICESCLARENCE THOMAS
Clarence Thomas currently serves as an Associate Justi...Read More
ANTHONY KENNEDY
Anthony Kennedy is currently serving as an Associate J...Read More
JOHN ROBERTS
John Roberts was born in 1955 and is currently serving...Read More
AMY CONEY BARRETT
By Rachel Malehorn - Direct link, smugmug.com, CC BY 3.0,...Read More
BRETT M. KAVANAUGH
Brett M. Kavanaugh currently serves as an Associate...Read More
ELENA KAGAN
Elena Kagan currently serves as an Associate Justice o...Read More
SONIA SOTOMAYOR
Sonia Sotomayor currently serves as an Associate Justi...Read More
SAMUEL ALITO
Samuel Alito currently serves as an Associate Justice ...Read More
STEPHEN BREYER
Stephen Breyer currently serves as an Associate Justic...Read More
CLARENCE THOMAS
Clarence Thomas currently serves as an Associate Justi...Read More
ANTHONY KENNEDY
Anthony Kennedy is currently serving as an Associate J...Read More
JOHN ROBERTS
John Roberts was born in 1955 and is currently serving...Read More
AMY CONEY BARRETT
By Rachel Malehorn - Direct link, smugmug.com, CC BY 3.0,...Read More
BRETT M. KAVANAUGH
Brett M. Kavanaugh currently serves as an Associate...Read More
ELENA KAGAN
Elena Kagan currently serves as an Associate Justice o...Read More
prev
next
US CONSTITUTION TIMELINE1788
* Having been ratified by nine of the thirteen states, the Constitution is officially established.1788.06.21
* The first quadrennial presidential election under the new Constitution is held.1788.12.15
1789
* 1st United States Congress convenes1789.03.04
* House of Representatives reconvenes1789.04.01
* Electoral votes counted1789.04.06
* Senate reconvenes
1789.04.06
* John Adams assumes vice presidential duties1789.04.21
* Inauguration Day
1789.04.30
* First Inauguration of George Washington1789.04.30
* 1st Amendment submitted for ratification1789.09.25
* Constitutional Amendments ProposedBy Congress
1789.09.25
* 6th Amendment submitted for ratification1789.09.25
* 7th Amendment submitted for ratification1789.09.25
* 2nd Amendment submitted for ratification1789.09.25
* 8th Amendment submitted for ratification1789.09.25
* 3rd Amendment submitted for ratification1789.09.25
* 9th Amendment submitted for ratification1789.09.25
* 4th Amendment submitted for ratification1789.09.25
* 10th Amendment submitted for ratification1789.09.25
* 5th Amendment submitted for ratification1789.09.25
* Supreme Court Chief Justice John Jay confirmed by the Senate1789.09.26
* Supreme Court Justice John Rutledge confirmed by the Senate1789.09.26
* Supreme Court Justice William Cushing confirmed by the Senate1789.09.26
* Supreme Court Justice James Wilson confirmed by the Senate1789.09.26
* Supreme Court Justice John Blair, Jr. confirmed by the Senate1789.09.26
1790
* Supreme Court convenes1790.02.02
* Supreme Court Justice James Iredell confirmed by the Senate1790.02.10
1791
* Supreme Court Justice Thomas Johnson confirmed by the Senate1791.11.07
* Ratification of 5th Amendment completed1791.12.15
* Ratification of 6th Amendment completed1791.12.15
* Ratification of 7th Amendment completed1791.12.15
* Ratification of 1st Amendment completed1791.12.15
* Ratification of 2nd Amendment completed1791.12.15
* Ratification of 8th Amendment completed1791.12.15
* Ratification of 9th Amendment completed1791.12.15
* Ratification of 3rd Amendment completed1791.12.15
* Ratification of 10th Amendment completed1791.12.15
* Ratification of 4th Amendment completed1791.12.15
1793
* Second Inauguration of George Washington1793.03.04
* Supreme Court Justice William Paterson confirmed by the Senate1793.03.04
1794
* 11th Amendment submitted for ratification1794.03.04
1795
* Ratification of 11th Amendment completed1795.02.07
1796
* Supreme Court Justice Samuel Chase confirmed by the Senate1796.01.27
* Supreme Court Chief Justice Oliver Ellsworth confirmed by theSenate
1796.03.04
1797
* Inauguration of John Adams1797.03.04
1798
* Supreme Court Justice Bushrod Washington confirmed by the Senate1798.12.20
1799
* Supreme Court Justice Alfred Moore confirmed by the Senate1799.12.10
1801
* Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall confirmed by the Senate1801.01.27
* First Inauguration of Thomas Jefferson1801.03.04
1803
* 12th Amendment submitted for ratification1803.12.09
1804
* Supreme Court Justice William Johnson confirmed by the Senate1804.03.24
* Ratification of 12th Amendment completed1804.06.15
1805
* Second Inauguration of Thomas Jefferson1805.03.04
1806
* Supreme Court Justice Henry B. Livingston confirmed by the Senate1806.12.17
1807
* Supreme Court Justice Thomas Todd confirmed by the Senate1807.03.02
1809
* First Inauguration of James Madison1809.03.04
1811
* Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story confirmed by the Senate1811.11.18
* Supreme Court Justice Gabriel Duvall confirmed by the Senate1811.11.18
1813
* Second Inauguration of James Madison1813.03.04
1817
* First Inauguration of James Monroe1817.03.04
1821
* Second Inauguration of James Monroe1821.03.05
1823
* Supreme Court Justice Smith Thompson confirmed by the Senate1823.12.09
1825
* Inauguration of John Quincy Adams1825.03.04
1826
* Supreme Court Justice Robert Trimble confirmed by the Senate1826.05.09
1829
* First Inauguration of Andrew Jackson1829.03.04
* Supreme Court Justice John McLean confirmed by the Senate1829.03.07
1830
* Supreme Court Justice Henry Baldwin confirmed by the Senate1830.01.06
1833
* Second Inauguration of Andrew Jackson1833.03.04
1835
* Supreme Court Justice James Moore Wayne confirmed by the Senate1835.01.09
1836
* Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger B. Taney confirmed by the Senate1836.03.15
* Supreme Court Justice Philip P. Barbour confirmed by the Senate1836.03.15
1837
* Inauguration of Martin Van Buren1837.03.04
* Supreme Court Justice John Catron confirmed by the Senate1837.03.08
* Supreme Court Justice John McKinley confirmed by the Senate1837.09.25
1841
* Supreme Court Justice Peter Vivian Daniel confirmed by the Senate1841.03.02
* Inauguration of William Henry Harrison1841.03.04
* Inauguration of John Tyler1841.04.06
1845
* Supreme Court Justice Samuel Nelson confirmed by the Senate1845.02.14
* Inauguration of James Knox Polk1845.03.04
1846
* Supreme Court Justice Levi Woodbury confirmed by the Senate1846.01.31
* Supreme Court Justice Robert Cooper Grier confirmed by the Senate1846.08.04
1849
* Inauguration of Zachary Taylor1849.03.05
1850
* Inauguration of Milliard Fillmore1850.07.10
1851
* Supreme Court Justice Benjamin R. Curtis confirmed by the Senate1851.12.20
1853
* Inauguration of Franklin Pierce1853.03.04
* Supreme Court Justice John A. Campbell confirmed by the Senate1853.03.22
1857
* Inauguration of James Buchanan1857.03.04
1858
* Supreme Court Justice Nathan Clifford confirmed by the Senate1858.01.12
1861
* First Inauguration of Abraham Lincoln1861.03.04
1862
* Supreme Court Justice Noah Haynes Swayne confirmed by the Senate1862.01.24
* Supreme Court Justice Samuel Freeman Miller confirmed by theSenate
1862.07.16
* Supreme Court Justice David Davis confirmed by Senate1862.12.08
1863
* Supreme Court Justice Stephen Johnson Field confirmed by theSenate
1863.03.10
1864
* Supreme Court Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase confirmed by theSenate
1864.12.06
1865
* 13th Amendment submitted for ratification1865.01.31
* Second Inauguration of Abraham Lincoln1865.03.04
* Inauguration of Andrew Johnson1865.04.15
* Ratification of 13th Amendment completed1865.12.06
1866
* 14th Amendment submitted for ratification1866.06.13
* Ratification of 14th Amendment completed1866.07.09
1869
* 15th Amendment submitted for ratification1869.02.26
* First Inauguration of Ulysses S. Grant1869.03.04
* Supreme Court Justice Edwin M. Stanton confirmed by Senate1869.12.20
1870
* Ratification of 15th Amendment completed1870.02.03
* Supreme Court Justice William Strong confirmed by the Senate1870.02.18
* Supreme Court Justice Joseph P. Bradley confirmed by the Senate1870.03.21
1872
* Supreme Court Justice Ward Hunt confirmed by the Senate1872.12.11
1873
* Second Inauguration of Ulysses S. Grant1873.03.04
1874
* Supreme Court Chief Justice Morrison Waite confirmed by the Senate1874.01.21
1877
* Inauguration of Rutherford B. Hayes1877.03.05
* Supreme Court Justice John Marshall Harlan confirmed by the Senate1877.11.29
1880
* Supreme Court Justice William Burnham Woods confirmed by theSenate
1880.12.21
1881
* Inauguration of James A. Garfield1881.03.04
* Supreme Court Justice Stanley Matthews confirmed by the Senate1881.05.12
* Inauguration of Chester Arthur1881.09.20
* Supreme Court Justice Horace Gray confirmed by the Senate1881.12.20
1882
* Supreme Court Justice Samuel Blatchford confirmed by the Senate1882.03.22
1885
* First Inauguration of Grover Cleveland1885.03.04
1888
* Supreme Court Justice Lucius Q.C. Lamar confirmed by Senate1888.01.16
* Supreme Court Justice Melville Fuller confirmed by Senate1888.07.20
1889
* Inauguration of Benjamin Harrison1889.03.04
* Supreme Court Justice David Josian Brewer confirmed by Senate1889.12.18
1890
* Supreme Court Justice Henry Billings Brown confirmed by Senate1890.12.29
1892
* Supreme Court Justice George Shiras Jr. confirmed by Senate1892.07.26
1893
* Supreme Court Justice Howell E. Jackson confirmed by Senate1893.02.18
* Second Inauguration of Grover Cleveland1893.03.04
1894
* Supreme Court Justice Edward D. White confirmed by Senate1894.02.19
1895
* Supreme Court Justice Rufus W. Peckham confirmed by Senate1895.12.09
1897
* First Inauguration of William McKinley1897.03.04
1898
* Supreme Court Justice Joseph McKenna confirmed by Senate1898.01.21
confirmed by Senate
1901
* Second Inauguration of William McKinley1901.03.04
* First Inauguration of Theodore Roosevelt1901.09.14
1902
* Supreme Court Justice Oliver W. Holmes Jr. confirmed by Senate1902.12.04
1903
* Supreme Court Justice William R. Day confirmed by Senate1903.02.23
1905
* Second Inauguration of Theodore Roosevelt1905.03.04
1906
* Supreme Court Justice William Henry Moody confirmed by Senate1906.12.12
1909
* Inauguration of William Howard Taft1909.03.04
* 16th Amendment submitted for ratification1909.07.12
* Supreme Court Justice Horace Harmon Lurton confirmed by Senate1909.12.20
1910
* Supreme Court Justice Charles Evans Hughes confirmed by Senate1910.05.02
* Supreme Court Chief Justice Edward D. White confirmed by Senate1910.12.12
* Supreme Court Justice Willis Van Devanter confirmed by Senate1910.12.15
* Supreme Court Justice Joseph Rucker Lamar confirmed by Senate1910.12.15
1912
* Supreme Court Justice Mahlon Pitney confirmed by Senate1912.03.13
* 17th Amendment submitted for ratification1912.05.13
1913
* Ratification of 16th Amendment completed1913.02.03
* First Inauguration of Woodrow Wilson1913.03.04
* Ratification of 17th Amendment completed1913.04.08
1914
* Supreme Court Justice James C. McReynolds confirmed by Senate1914.08.29
1916
* Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis confirmed by Senate1916.06.01
* Supreme Court Justice John Hessin Clarke confirmed by Senate1916.07.24
1917
* Second Inauguration of Woodrow Wilson1917.03.05
* 18th Amendment submitted for ratification1917.12.18
1919
* Ratification of 18th Amendment completed1919.01.16
* 19th Amendment submitted for ratification1919.06.04
1920
* Ratification of 19th Amendment completed1920.08.18
1921
* Inauguration of Warren G. Harding1921.03.04
* Supreme Court Chief Justice William Howard Taft confirmed bySenate
1921.06.30
1922
* Supreme Court Justice George Sutherland confirmed by Senate1922.09.05
* Supreme Court Justice Pierce Butler confirmed by Senate1922.12.21
1923
* Supreme Court Justice Edward Terry Sanford confirmed by Senate1923.01.29
* First Inauguration of Calvin Coolidge1923.08.03
1925
* Supreme Court Justice Harlan F. Stone confirmed by Senate1925.02.05
* Second Inauguration of Calvin Coolidge1925.03.04
1929
* Inauguration of Herbert Hoover1929.03.04
1930
* Supreme Court Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes confirmed bySenate
1930.02.13
* Supreme Court Justice Owen Roberts confirmed by Senate1930.05.20
1932
* Supreme Court Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo confirmed by Senate1932.02.24
* 20th Amendment submitted for ratification1932.03.02
1933
* Ratification of 20th Amendment completed1933.01.23
* 21st Amendment submitted for ratification1933.02.20
* First Inauguration of Franklin Delano Roosevelt1933.03.04
* Ratification of 21st Amendment completed1933.12.05
1937
* Second Inauguration of Franklin Delano Roosevelt1937.01.20
* Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black confirmed by Senate1937.08.17
1938
* Supreme Court Justice Stanley Forman Reed confirmed by Senate1938.01.25
1939
* Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter confirmed by Senate1939.01.17
* Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas confirmed by Senate1939.04.04
1940
* Supreme Court Justice Frank Murphy confirmed by Senate1940.01.16
1941
* Third Inauguration of Franklin Delano Roosevelt1941.01.20
* Supreme Court Justice James F. Byrnes confirmed by Senate1941.06.12
* Supreme Court Chief Justice Harlan F. Stone confirmed by Senate1941.06.27
* Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson confirmed by Senate1941.07.07
1943
* Supreme Court Justice Wiley Blount Rutledge confirmed by Senate1943.02.08
1945
* Fourth Inauguration of Franklin Delano Roosevelt1945.01.20
* First Inauguration of Harry S. Truman1945.04.12
* Supreme Court Justice Harold Hitz Burton confirmed by Senate1945.09.19
1946
* Supreme Court Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson confirmed by Senate1946.06.20
1947
* 22nd Amendment submitted for ratification1947.03.24
1949
* Second Inauguration of Harry S. Truman1949.01.20
* Supreme Court Justice Tom C. Clark confirmed by Senate1949.09.18
* Supreme Court Justice Sherman Minton confirmed by Senate1949.10.04
1951
* Ratification of 22nd Amendment completed1951.02.27
1953
* First Inauguration of Dwight D. Eisenhower1953.01.20
1954
* Supreme Court Chief Justice Earl Warren confirmed by Senate1954.03.01
1955
* Supreme Court Justice John Marshall Harlan II confirmed by Senate1955.03.16
1957
* Second Inauguration of Dwight D. Eisenhower1957.01.21
* Supreme Court Justice William J. Brennan Jr. confirmed by Senate1957.03.19
* Supreme Court Justice Charles Evans Whittaker confirmed by Senate1957.03.19
1959
* Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart confirmed by Senate1959.05.05
1960
* 23rd Amendment submitted for ratification1960.06.16
1961
* Inauguration of John F. Kennedy1961.01.20
* Ratification of 23rd Amendment completed1961.03.29
1962
* Supreme Court Justice Byron White confirmed by Senate1962.04.11
* 24th Amendment submitted for ratification1962.09.14
* Supreme Court Justice Arthur Goldberg confirmed by Senate1962.09.25
1963
* First Inauguration of Lyndon B. Johnson1963.11.22
1964
* Ratification of 24th Amendment completed1964.01.23
1965
* Second Inauguration of Lyndon B. Johnson1965.01.20
* 25th Amendment submitted for ratification1965.07.06
* Supreme Court Justice Abe Fortas confirmed by Senate1965.08.11
* Supreme Court Justice Abe Fortas confirmed by Senate1965.11.08
1967
* Ratification of 25th Amendment completed1967.02.10
* Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall confirmed by Senate1967.08.30
1969
* First Inauguration of Richard M. Nixon1969.01.20
* Supreme Court Chief Justice Warren E. Burger confirmed by Senate1969.06.09
1970
* Supreme Court Justice Harry Blackmun confirmed by Senate1970.05.12
1971
* 26th Amendment submitted for ratification1971.03.23
* Ratification of 26th Amendment completed1971.07.01
* Supreme Court Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. confirmed by Senate1971.12.06
* Supreme Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist confirmed by Senate1971.12.10
1973
* Second Inauguration of Richard M. Nixon1973.01.20
1974
* Inauguration of Gerald R. Ford1974.08.09
1975
* Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens confirmed by Senate1975.12.17
1977
* Inauguration of Jimmy Carter1977.01.20
1981
* First Inauguration of Ronald Reagan1981.01.20
* Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor confirmed by Senate1981.09.21
1985
* Second Inauguration of Ronald Reagan1985.01.21
1986
* Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia confirmed by Senate1986.09.17
1988
* Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy confirmed by Senate1988.02.03
1989
* Inauguration of George Bush1989.01.20
1990
* Supreme Court Justice David Souter confirmed by Senate1990.10.02
1991
* Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas confirmed by Senate1991.10.15
1992
* Ratification of 27th Amendment completed1992.05.05
1993
* First Inauguration of William J. Clinton1993.01.20
* Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg confirmed by Senate1993.08.03
1994
* Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer confirmed by Senate1994.07.29
1997
* Second Inauguration of William J. Clinton1997.01.20
2001
* First Inauguration of George W. Bush2001.01.20
2005
* Second Inauguration of George W. Bush2005.01.20
* Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts confirmed by Senate2005.09.29
2006
* Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito confirmed by Senate2006.01.31
2009
* First Inauguration of Barrack Obama2009.01.20
* Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor confirmed by Senate2009.08.06
2010
* Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan confirmed by Senate2010.08.05
2013
* Second Inauguration of Barrack Obama2013.01.21
2017
* Inauguration of Donald Trump2017.01.20
LANDMARK DECISIONS OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT Right-click or option-click the case name and choose “Save As…” to download. Click a topic to navigate through the Constitution.Clear Search
_Click on column header to sort._Search By Letter
* A
* B
* C
* D
* E
* F
* G
* H
* I
* J
* K
* L
* M
* N
* O
* P
* Q
* R
* S
* T
* U
* V
* W
* X
* Y
* Z
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZFull Name
Title
Years Active
Related Articles
Samuel Alito
Supreme Court Justice January 31, 2006 - Present * U.S. v. Jones: Police GPS Tracking Requires a Warrant * Salinas v. Texas: Do Americans Still Have the Right to RemainSilent?
* Supreme Court’s Latest Abortion Case Lacked Fireworks * Fernandez v. California: Ruling Makes It Easier for Police toSearch Your Home
* Supreme Court to Decide Constitutionality of State Ban onAffirmative Action
* Prayer Before Government Meetings Upheld As Nation’s Tradition * Holt v Hobbs: Jail’s Beard Policy Violates Rights of MuslimPrisoner
* SOX Conviction for Violating Sarbanes-Oxley Act Overturned * San Francisco v. Sheehan: Law Enforcement and the Mentally Disabled * Separation of Powers Decides Jerusalem Passport Dispute * Lethal Injection Cocktail Approved in Glossip v. Gross * Court Confirms Disparate Impact Claims Allowed Under Fair HousingAct
* Arizona Redistricting Again * Harris v. Quinn: Public Employees Union and the First Amendment * NFIB v. Sebelius: ACA Survives First Constitutional Challenge * Boumediene v. Bush: Constitutional Rights of Guantanamo Detainees * Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association: Video Games & TheFirst Amendment
* Perez v. Mortage Bankers Association: APA Compliance * Kennedy v. Louisiana: Eighth Amendment Restrictions on the DeathPenalty
* Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc. * Davis v. Ayala: Excluding Attorneys from Batson Hearing WasHarmless Error
* Jennings v. Stephens: Certificate of Appealability Not Required forHabeas Petitioner
* Johnson v. the United States: ACCA Unconstitutionally Vague * Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez: Class Actions and Article III * Wearry v. Cain: Brady Violation Saves Death Row Inmate * Luis v. United States: Frozen Assets and the Sixth Amendment * Heffernan v City of Paterson: SCOTUS Examines Employee Rights underthe First Amendment
* Franchise Tax Board of California v Hyatt: Applying the Full Faithand Credit Clause
* Williams v Pennsylvania: Judge’s Failure to Recuse Violated DueProcess
* Court Limits RICO in RJR Nabisco, Inc v The European Community * Warrantless Breath Tests Upheld in Birchfield v North Dakota * Affirmative Action Victory in Fisher v University of Texas atAustin
* Commerce Clause Broad Interpretation in Taylor v United States * Court Remands Spokeo, Inc. v Robins to Ninth Circuit to DetermineStanding
* Supreme Court Overturns Stun Gun Ban in Commonwealth v Caetano * SCOTUS Issues Key Insider Trading Ruling in Salman v United States * SCOTUS Oral Arguments in December, 2016 * Buck v Davis: Racial Bias & Sixth Amendment Might Reverse DeathSentence
* Pretrial Detention Fits Fourth Amendment “as Hand in Glove” * Water Splash v Menon: Supreme Court Allows International JudicialProcess by Mail
* County of Los Angeles vs Mendez: Supreme Court Strikes Down Ninth Circuit’s Provocation Rule * Town of Chester v Laroe Estates, Inc: Supreme Court Rules Intervenors Must Have Standing * Matal v Tam: Supreme Court Holds Disparaging Trademark Ban ViolatesFirst Amendment
* High Court Revives Part of Trump Administration’s Travel Ban * Murr v Wisconsin Supreme Court Creates New Regulatory Takings Test * Pavan v Smith: SCOTUS Reaffirms Rights of Same-Sex Couples * Bristol-Myers Squibb Co v Superior Court of California: Getting Personal Jurisdiction Now More Difficult * Juror Racial Bias Returns Death Row Inmate Case to Trial Court inTharpe v Sellers
* Stop the Beach Renourishment v Florida Department of Environmental Protection: Littoral Rights in Florida are Protected * Marinello v United States: IRS “Omnibus Clause” Requires Nexusfor Tax Obstruction
* SCOTUS Strikes Down PASPA in Murphy v National Collegiate AthleticAssociation
* Collins v Virginia: SCOTUS Reigns in Fourth Amendment’s Automobile Exception * SCOTUS Greenlights Taxing Internet Retailers in South Dakota vWayfair
* SCOTUS Overrules Abood in Janus v AFSCME * Divided U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Trump Travel Ban in Trump vHawaii
* Right to Maintain Innocence in McCoy v Louisiana * Impact of Jennings v Rodriquez on Immigrant Detention * Redistricting Commission Doesn’t Violate Constitution’sElection Clause
* Garza v Idaho Clarifies Ineffective Assistance of Counsel * SCOTUS Takes on Scandalous Trademarks and Hears Oral Arguments inSix Cases
* The American Legion v American Humanist Association: Bladensburg Cross Does Not Violate First Amendment * SCOTUS Upholds Dual-Sovereignty Doctrine in Gamble v United States * Court Upholds Warrantless Blood Test in Mitchell v Wisconsin * Justices Could Skirt Second Amendment in Gun Rights Case * Supreme Court Uphold Kansas Insanity Defense Test in Kahler vKansas
* SCOTUS Rules Sixth Amendment Right to a Unanimous Jury Applies inState Courts
* New Test Under Clean Water Act * SCOTUS Establishes New Test Under Clean Water Act * Divided Court Rules Trump Administration Can’t End DACA…For Now * SCOTUS Rules Ministerial Exception Bars Teachers’ DiscriminationSuits
* SCOTUS Invalidates Government Debt Collection Exception to RoboCall Ban
* US Supreme Court Rejects Statute of Limitations for Military Rape * Divided Court Rules U.S. Railroad Retirement Board Decision Subjectto Judicial Review
Henry Baldwin
Past Justice
January 6, 1830 – April 21, 1844 Philip Pendleton BarbourPast Justice
March 15, 1836 – February 25, 1841Amy Coney Barrett
Supreme Court Justice October 27, 2020 - Present * Supreme Court to Hear Appeal Over US Census * Justice Barrett Joins Court in Hearing Oral Arguments in Five Cases * Supreme Court Strikes Down NY COVID-19 Rule Restricting Attendance at Houses of Worship * Divided Court Rules U.S. Railroad Retirement Board Decision Subjectto Judicial Review
* SCOTUS Rules FOIA Exception Applies to Environmental OpinionHugo Black
Past Justice
August 18, 1937 – September 17, 1971 * _Historical_ - U.S. v. Carolene Products Company: The Importance ofFootnotes
* _Historical_ - West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette * _Historical_ - Korematsu v. United States: National Security Outweighs Individual Rights * U.S. V. O’Brien: Symbolic Speech and the First Amendment * _Historical_ - Mapp v. Ohio: Use of Evidence Under the 4thAmendment
* _Historical_ -Everson v Board of Education Applied EstablishmentClause to States
* Harper v Virginia Board of Elections – Poll Tax Violated Equal Protection Clause * Tinker v Des Moines Established First Amendment Rights of Students * Resisting Congressional Inquiries Under Barenblatt v. United StatesHarry Blackmun
Past Justice
May 14, 1970 – August 3, 1994 * _Historical_ - Marsh v. Chambers: The Establishment of Religion * _Historical_ - Furman v. Georgia: The Constitutionality of theDeath Penalty
* Cohen v. California — Freedom of Expression Protects OffensiveWords
* Cohen v California — Freedom of Expression Protects OffensiveWords
* Davis v Bandemer Held Courts Can Decide Partisan GerrymanderingClaims
* Students’ Right of Expression Under Hazelwood School Districtv Kuhlmeier
* Political Speech Under Burson v FreemanJohn Blair, Jr.
Past Justice
September 30, 1789 – October 25, 1795 * _Historical_ - Hayburn's Case: The Issue of JusticiabilitySamuel Blatchford
Past Justice
March 22, 1882 – July 7, 1893 Joseph Philo BradleyPast Justice
March 21, 1870 – January 22, 1892Louis Brandeis
Past Justice
June 1, 1916 – February 13, 1939 * _Historical_ - U.S. v. Carolene Products Company: The Importance ofFootnotes
* _Historical_ - Abrams v. United States: The Dissent that ShapedFree Speech
* _Historical_ - Swift v Tyson Authorizes Federal Courts to Create Federal “Common” Law * _Historical_ -Erie Railroad Co v Tompkins Decision Established Modern Diversity Jurisdiction * Myers v United States Holds President Can Remove Executive BranchOfficials
William Joseph Brennan, Jr.Past Justice
October 15, 1956 – July 20, 1990David Josiah Brewer
Past Justice
December 18, 1889 – March 28, 1910Stephen Breyer
Supreme Court Justice August 3, 1994 - Present * Salinas v. Texas: Do Americans Still Have the Right to RemainSilent?
* United States v. Windsor: U.S. Supreme Court Overturns DOMA * Kaley v. United States: Prisoners Have No Constitutional Right to Challenge Asset Freezes * Supreme Court to Decide Constitutionality of State Ban onAffirmative Action
* Prayer Before Government Meetings Upheld As Nation’s Tradition * Burwell v. Hobby Lobby: Divided Court Strikes Down ACA’s Contraception Mandate * National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning: Supreme Court Limits Recess Appointment Power * SOX Conviction for Violating Sarbanes-Oxley Act Overturned * When Does Redistricting Violate the Voting Rights Act? * Traffic Stop Drug Search Fails Fourth Amendment “Sniff” Test * Same-Sex Marriage Affirmed in Obergefell v. Hodges * Lethal Injection Cocktail Approved in Glossip v. Gross * Arizona Redistricting Again * NFIB v. Sebelius: ACA Survives First Constitutional Challenge * Boumediene v. Bush: Constitutional Rights of Guantanamo Detainees * Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association: Video Games & TheFirst Amendment
* Kennedy v. Louisiana: Eighth Amendment Restrictions on the DeathPenalty
* Week in Review: SCOTUS Chides California Court & Adds Drunk DrivingCase
* Johnson v. the United States: ACCA Unconstitutionally Vague * Kingsley v. Hendrickson: The Objectively Unreasonable Standard for Excessive Force Claims * Hurst v. Florida: Only a Jury Can Impose the Death Sentence * Gobeille v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company: ERISA Pre-empts State Health Care Database * Luis v. United States: Frozen Assets and the Sixth Amendment * Heffernan v City of Paterson: SCOTUS Examines Employee Rights underthe First Amendment
* U.S. Supreme Court Struggles Over Design Patent Damages in Samsungv Apple
* Supreme Court Sides with Prosecutors in Shaw v United States * Venezuela v Helmerich & Payne International Expands SovereignImmunities Act
* Midland Funding, LLC v Johnson: U.S. Supreme Court Sides with DebtCollector
* Supreme Court Vacates Death Row Sentence in McWilliams v Dunn * Supreme Court Clarifies Structural-Error Doctrine in Weaver vMassachusetts
* Turner v United States: No New Trial in Notorious DC Murder Case * Class v United States (2018) Guilty Plea Does Not Bar Federal Criminal Defendant from Challenging Constitutionality of Statute ofConviction
* Kelo v New London: Taking Land for Private Development Doesn’t Violate Constitution * Marinello v United States: IRS “Omnibus Clause” Requires Nexusfor Tax Obstruction
* Epic Systems Corp v Lewis: SCOTUS Upholds Workplace Agreements Banning Class Actions * Husted v A Philip Randolph Institute: Supreme Court Approves OhioVoter Removal Law
* SCOTUS Greenlights Taxing Internet Retailers in South Dakota vWayfair
* SCOTUS Sides with Anti-Abortion Pregnancy Centers in FirstAmendment Case
* Divided U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Trump Travel Ban in Trump vHawaii
* United States v Stitt Clarifies Burglary Under Armed CareerCriminal Act
* Wittman v Personhuballah Dismissed Due to Lack of Standing * SCOTUS Overturns Precedent in Franchise Tax Board of California vHyatt
* Mont v United States: Supreme Court Rules Pretrial Detention Can Toll Term of Federal Supervised Release * The American Legion v American Humanist Association: Bladensburg Cross Does Not Violate First Amendment * Rucho v Common Cause: Supreme Court Rules Courts Can’t Solve Partisan Gerrymandering * Court Upholds Warrantless Blood Test in Mitchell v Wisconsin * State-Actors Subject to the First Amendment in Manhattan Community Access Corp v Halleck * Justices Could Skirt Second Amendment in Gun Rights Case * SCOTUS Gives “Public Charge” Rule the Green Light in DHS v NewYork
* State’s Sovereign Immunity Under Alden v Maine * Supreme Court Uphold Kansas Insanity Defense Test in Kahler vKansas
* SCOTUS Blocks Wisconsin Absentee Ballot Extension Amid COVID-19Epidemic
* SCOTUS Rules Sixth Amendment Right to a Unanimous Jury Applies inState Courts
* New Test Under Clean Water Act * SCOTUS Establishes New Test Under Clean Water Act * Divided Court Rules Trump Administration Can’t End DACA…For Now * SCOTUS Rules Montana Funding Program Can’t Exclude ReligiousSchools
* Supreme Court Strikes Down CFPB Removal Provision But Leaves AgencyIntact
* SCOTUS Rejects Appointments Clause Challenge to Puerto RicoOversight Board
* US Supreme Court Halts Curbside Voting in Alabama * SCOTUS Relies on lack of Standing to Uphold Delaware JudicialBalance Requirement
* Supreme Court Rules Census Suit Not Ripe for Judicial Review * Divided Court Rules U.S. Railroad Retirement Board Decision Subjectto Judicial Review
* Divided Court Strikes Down COVID-19 Restrictions on In-Home Religious Gatherings * SCOTUS Rules FTC Can’t Pursue Equitable Relief Henry Billings BrownPast Justice
29 December 1890 – 28 May 1906 * _Historical_ - Plessy v. Ferguson: The Supreme Court’s MostNotorious Decision
* _Historical_ - Pollock v. Farmers Loan & Trust Co.: Federal Income Tax Violated the ConstitutionWarren E. Burger
Chief Justice
June 23, 1969 – September 26, 1986 * Obama’s Battles With The Press Do Not Rival Nixon: New York Timesv. United States
* _Historical_ - Furman v. Georgia: The Constitutionality of theDeath Penalty
* _Historical_ - Wisconsin v. Yoder: Compulsory Education ViolatesFirst Amendment
* Griggs v Duke Power Co & the 1964 Civil Rights Act * Lemon v Kurtzman Test for Establishment Clause Violations * Richmond Newspapers Inc v Virginia Establishes Right to AttendCriminal Trials
* Gertz v. Welch Established Defamation Standard for PrivateIndividuals
Harold Hitz Burton
Past Justice
September 22, 1945 – October 13, 1958Pierce Butler
Past Justice
December 21, 1922 – November 16, 1939 James Francis ByrnesPast Justice
June 25, 1941 – October 3, 1942 John Archibald CampbellPast Justice
March 22, 1853 – April 30, 1861 Benjamin Nathan CardozoPast Justice
March 2, 1932 – July 9, 1938Previous
Page
of 65 rows10 rows20 rows25 rows50 rows100 rowsNext
Loading...
CONSTITUTIONAL VIDEOS | DONALD SCARINCIMay 26, 2021
THE IMPORTANCE OF SERVING ON A COMMITTEEJuly 6, 2020
THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE (AS READ BY MAX MCLEAN)EDUCATION & HISTORY
* Constitution Quiz
* Constitutional Law Center * David Brearley and the Making of the United States Constitution byDonald Scarinci
Read More
GENERAL INFORMATION
* Government & Law
* Landmark Cases of the U.S. Supreme Court * National Park Service Guide to Washington DCRead More
STUDENT RESOURCES
* Blog Business Law is an educational resource for Business Law students on the university level.Read More
PREVIOUS ARTICLES
SCOTUS RULES FTC CAN’T PURSUE EQUITABLE RELIEF by DONALD SCARINCI on May 27, 2021 In AMG Capital Management, LLC v. FTC, 593 U.S. ____ (2021), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the F...Read More
SUPREME COURT CLARIFIES STANDING REQUIREMENTS FOR HABEAS CLAIM by DONALD SCARINCI on May 24, 2021 In Alaska v. Wright, 593 U.S. ____ (2021), the U.S. Supreme Court held that if offenders have finis...Read More
FINDING OF PERMANENT INCORRIGIBILITY NOT REQUIRED TO IMPOSE LIFE SENTENCE ON JUVENILE by DONALD SCARINCI on May 3, 2021 In Jones v. Mississippi, 593 U.S. ____ (2021), the U.S. Supreme Court again clarified when juvenile...Read More
All Posts
THE AMENDMENTS
*
AMENDMENT1
* Establishment ClauseFree Exercise Clause* Freedom of Speech
* Freedoms of Press
* Freedom of Assembly, and PetititionRead More
*
AMENDMENT2
* The Right to Bear ArmsRead More
*
AMENDMENT4
* Unreasonable Searches and SeizuresRead More
*
AMENDMENT5
* Due Process
* Eminent Domain
* Rights of Criminal DefendantsRead More
PREAMBLE TO THE BILL OF RIGHTS Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred andeighty nine.
THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.Read More
AMERICAN BIOGRAPHIESHillary Clinton
By Gage Skidmore, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons...Read More
*
WILLIAM HOWARD TAFT
William Howard Taft lived between 1857 and 1930, and was the 27th President of the United States as...Read More
*
JOHN DEWEY
John Dewey was a psychologist, philosopher, and educator whose ideas were central to the Progressive Movement and helped...Read More
*
WOODROW WILSON
Thomas Woodrow Wilson served as the 28th President of the United States from 1913 to 1921. Wilson was...Read More
*
WILLIAM JENNINGS BRYAN William Jennings Bryan, known as the “Great Commoner,” was one of the great orators of his era. Despite...Read More
MORE RECENT POSTS
* SCOTUS Rules FOIA Exception Applies to Environmental Opinion * SCOTUS Rules Students Have Standing to Bring Free Speech Suit * SCOTUS Rules Montana Funding Program Can’t Exclude ReligiousSchools
* Investigatory Power of Congress Under McGrain v. Daugherty CONSTITUTIONAL LAW REPORTER TWITTER CONSTITUTIONAL LAW REPORTER RSS*
Legal Theory Bookworm: "International Law and the Private Corporation 1886-1981" by Lustig- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 6/5/2021
*
Download of the Week: "Percolation's Value" by Davis & Coenen- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 6/5/2021
*
Circuit splits on copyright information and health care in jails-
SCOTUSblog
Date: 6/4/2021
*
New Jersey Legislature Passes Bill Extending Special EducationServices
- Government & Law BlogDate: 6/4/2021
*
Maltz on Casey & Abortion Rights- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 6/4/2021
*
The morning read for Friday, June 4-
SCOTUSblog
Date: 6/4/2021
*
NJ Supreme Court Upholds Reliance on Dying Declaration - Government & Law BlogDate: 6/4/2021
*
Alicea on the Originalism Debates & Political Theory- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 6/4/2021
*
Hauser on Funding Public Defense- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 6/4/2021
*
Puchniak on Stewardship & Controlling Shareholders- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 6/4/2021
*
Real estate agents ask court to block eviction moratorium-
SCOTUSblog
Date: 6/3/2021
*
Cheong on Legal Personhood for Artificial Intelligences- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 6/3/2021
*
Diverse six-justice majority rejects broad reading of computer-fraudlaw -
SCOTUSblog
Date: 6/3/2021
*
Cox on the Effectiveness of Divesting Military Commanders' Jurisdiction for Sexual Assault Cases- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 6/3/2021
*
Frye on Plagiarism
- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 6/3/2021
*
Justices narrow federal computer-fraud statute-
SCOTUSblog
Date: 6/3/2021
*
Cole, Jaffer, and Olson on FISA Court Transparency - Constitutional Law Prof BlogDate: 6/3/2021
*
Check it Out: The 100 Scholars' Letter on Threats to Democracy - Constitutional Law Prof BlogDate: 6/3/2021
*
State secrets and the constitutionality of the male-only draft-
SCOTUSblog
Date: 6/3/2021
*
The morning read for Thursday, June 3-
SCOTUSblog
Date: 6/3/2021
*
Tsai on "The Cycles of Constitutional Time" by Balkin- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 6/3/2021
*
Torrey on Crimmigation Cases in the Supreme Court- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 6/3/2021
*
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, June 3 (complete)-
SCOTUSblog
Date: 6/3/2021
*
Mason on the General Court of the European Union’s Judgment in theAmazon Case
- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 6/3/2021
*
Cerminara & Petrucci on Peace-of-Mind Effects- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 6/2/2021
*
Supreme Court’s spokesperson to step down after 38 years-
SCOTUSblog
Date: 6/2/2021
*
Sloss on Sovereignty & Transnational Constitutionalism- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 6/2/2021
*
Davis & Coenen on the Value of "Percolation" in the Lower Courts- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 6/2/2021
*
The morning read for Wednesday, June 2-
SCOTUSblog
Date: 6/2/2021
*
Gross on the State of Legal Theory in Nazi Germany & the Hart-FullerDebate
- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 6/2/2021
*
Sreekumar on Textualism & Judicial Independence- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 6/2/2021
*
Meese on Antitrust & the NCAA- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 6/2/2021
*
Lavi on Online Platforms & Terrorism- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 6/1/2021
*
Li on Post-Pandemic Privacy Law- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 6/1/2021
*
Court Says Tribal Officer Can Detain, Search Non-Native American on Public Road in Reservation - Constitutional Law Prof BlogDate: 6/1/2021
*
Bernick on Police Violence & Equal Protection of the Law- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 6/1/2021
*
Blass on Behavioral Equivalence & Automating the Judicial System- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 6/1/2021
*
Fontana on Destructive Federal Decentralization- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 5/31/2021
*
Kozel on Stare Decisis & Bivens- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 5/31/2021
*
McClain & Hacker on Liberal Feminist Jurisprudence- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 5/31/2021
*
Roznai on Constituent Power- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 5/31/2021
*
Legal Theory Lexicon: Positive and Normative Legal Theory- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 5/30/2021
*
Legal Theory Bookworm: "The Decline of Natural Law" by Banner- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 5/29/2021
*
Download of the Week: "Eliminating Constitutional Law" by Bernick- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 5/29/2021
*
Zwier on Impeachment After Trumpt- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 5/28/2021
*
Penney & Yahya on Determinants of Exclusion of Unconstitutionally Obtained Evidence in Canada- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 5/28/2021
*
Cohen on Techlaw Scholarship- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 5/28/2021
*
Sandefur on Federalism & the Indian Child Welfare Act- Legal Theory Blog
Date: 5/28/2021
*
Key Takeaways from Appellate Division’s Latest OPRA Decision - Government & Law BlogDate: 5/27/2021
*
NJ Supreme Court Clarifies Pleading Standard for Class-Action Suits - Government & Law BlogDate: 5/26/2021
*
NJ Supreme Court Rules Temporary Use of Virtual Grand Juries IsConstitutional
- Government & Law BlogDate: 5/25/2021
*
Court to Take Up Challenge to Right to Abortion, Roe v. Wade - Constitutional Law Prof BlogDate: 5/19/2021
*
Circuit Judge Takes on Standing Doctrine - Constitutional Law Prof BlogDate: 5/6/2021
*
Court Halts CDC Eviction Moratorium - Constitutional Law Prof BlogDate: 5/6/2021
*
Judge Orders DOJ to Release Advice on AG Barr's Summary of SpecialCounsel Report
- Constitutional Law Prof BlogDate: 5/5/2021
*
First Circuit Declines to Halt Geography-Based School AdmissionsProgram
- Constitutional Law Prof BlogDate: 5/4/2021
*
NJ Supreme Court Rules Denial of Last Minute Attorney Change Did Not Violate Right to Counsel - Government & Law BlogDate: 5/3/2021
*
State Price-Gouging Laws Don't Violate Dormant Commerce Clause forProducts on Amazon
- Constitutional Law Prof BlogDate: 4/30/2021
*
Second Circuit Rejects Bar Applicant's Disability Claim Citing StateSovereign Immunity
- Constitutional Law Prof BlogDate: 4/30/2021
*
New Jersey Supreme Court Orders Employer to Cover Costs of MedicalMarijuana
- Government & Law BlogDate: 4/26/2021
*
NJ Supreme Court Rules Judges Can’t Detain Non-Citizen Defendants toPrevent Removal
- Government & Law BlogDate: 4/19/2021
*
NJ Supreme Court Clarifies Impact of Pretrial Detention on Unemployment Compensation - Government & Law BlogDate: 4/12/2021
*
NJ Supreme Court Rules NJ Transit to Common Carrier Standard Under TCA - Government & Law BlogDate: 4/8/2021
EDITOR
Donald Scarinci
MANAGING PARTNER
Scarinci Hollenbeck
(201) 806-3364
AWARDS
FOLLOW ME
*
*
*
2018 Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC. All rights reserved. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising__
Details
Copyright © 2024 ArchiveBay.com. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | DMCA | 2021 | Feedback | Advertising | RSS 2.0