Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
More Annotations
A complete backup of www.malevsfemale.org
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of www.www.amateur.tv
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of worldwidewives.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of www.neatmovies.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of www.kaufmich.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Favourite Annotations
A complete backup of https://waystoshiftyourbusiness.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://scotmid.coop
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://premierprotein.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://teneriffa-news.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://pozicky-uver.sk
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://airmailapp.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://xn--h1aagokeh.xn--p1ai
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://lavandamichelle.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://doppiozero.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://huree.mn
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://discovercontainers.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://gerschedersv.de
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Text
Assistant
FULTON AND THE FUTURE OF RELIGIOUS LIBERTY By: Megan Coates, Staff Member, Vol. 19 Introduction The Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia. In this case, a Catholic foster care agency resisted the City’s policy requiring agencies to certify same-sex couples as foster parents. Before reaching the Supreme Court, Fulton was heard at the ThirdCircuit, where
PROTECTING PROTESTORS’ FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS, OR SILENTLY Photo Credit: Courtesy of Stephen Melkisethian. By Sarah Rozek; Staff Member (Vol. 16). Charlottesville, a city in West Central Virginia, has a population of more than 200,000.It was not, however, the city’s size, its great selection of wineries, or its world-class university which made it into the headlines this year.Rather, it was the “Unite the Right” torchlight rally, which started NORTH CAROLINA’S FIRST AMENDMENT: PROVISIONAL PROTECTIONS Photo Credit: Courtesy of Jimmy Emerson, DVM By Adam Griffin; Staff Member (Vol. 16) North Carolina’s First Amendment Before the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, and before the Supreme Court doctrine of incorporation was created to impose the protections of the First Amendment against the State Governments, most State Constitutions had sister provisions that protected PACKINGHAM V. NORTH CAROLINA: A PRECAUTIONARY APPROACH TO By Jack F. Williams, Staff Member (Vol. 16) In 2008, the North Carolina legislature passed the “Protect Children from Sexual Predators Act.” As part of the Act, subsection 14-202.5 banned the use of “commercial social networking Web sites by any registered sex offender.” The statute applied to about “20,000 people in North Carolina” and reports FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Mission. Since 2002, the First Amendment Law Review (“FALR”) has sought to “promote and protect the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment through publishing scholarly writings on, and promoting discussion of, issues related to the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.” VOLUME 19 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 19 Fall Issue. Walking Out on Student Speech: The Erosion of Tinker and how Pickering Promises to Restore It by Emily Brown. Legal Fellow, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Misinformation Mayhem: Social Media Platforms’ Efforts to Combat Medical and Political Misinformation by Dawn Carla Nunziato. William Wallace Kirkpatrick Research Professor and Professor of Law, The VOLUMES - FIRSTAMENDMENTLAWREVIEW.ORG Volumes. First Amendment Law Review publishes one Volume each year. Each Volume contain three issues; Fall, Spring, and Symposium. Typically, FALR will publish two student pieces and two or three professional pieces in the Fall and Spring issues. IS TRUMP REALLY GUILTY OF INCITEMENT? By: Hannah Simmons, Staff Member, Vol. 19. On February 13, 2021, former President Donald Trump was acquitted of the impeachment charge alleging that he incited the United States Capitol riots. Even though the Senate did not reach the two-thirds majority needed to convict Trump for his role in inciting the mob to attack the capitol, this does not mean that Trump is not guilty. “PLAY IN THE JOINTS” OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT By: Kristopher L. Caudle* The First Amendment to the United States Constitution provides two fundamental guarantees for all citizens: The government shall not establish an official religion; and the government shall not infringe upon a citizen’s right to freely exercise their chosen religion. However, the Supreme Court continues to recognize areas where there is ample VOLUME 17 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 17 Fall Issue Correcting the Generally Accepted but Unjustified Interpretation of the Free Speech Clause by Michele Cotton Associate Professor and Director of the Legal and Ethical Studies program at the University of Baltimore Yale Gordon College of Arts and Sciences Market Place Theory in the Age of AI Communicators by Jared SchroederAssistant
FULTON AND THE FUTURE OF RELIGIOUS LIBERTY By: Megan Coates, Staff Member, Vol. 19 Introduction The Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia. In this case, a Catholic foster care agency resisted the City’s policy requiring agencies to certify same-sex couples as foster parents. Before reaching the Supreme Court, Fulton was heard at the ThirdCircuit, where
PROTECTING PROTESTORS’ FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS, OR SILENTLY Photo Credit: Courtesy of Stephen Melkisethian. By Sarah Rozek; Staff Member (Vol. 16). Charlottesville, a city in West Central Virginia, has a population of more than 200,000.It was not, however, the city’s size, its great selection of wineries, or its world-class university which made it into the headlines this year.Rather, it was the “Unite the Right” torchlight rally, which started NORTH CAROLINA’S FIRST AMENDMENT: PROVISIONAL PROTECTIONS Photo Credit: Courtesy of Jimmy Emerson, DVM By Adam Griffin; Staff Member (Vol. 16) North Carolina’s First Amendment Before the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, and before the Supreme Court doctrine of incorporation was created to impose the protections of the First Amendment against the State Governments, most State Constitutions had sister provisions that protected PACKINGHAM V. NORTH CAROLINA: A PRECAUTIONARY APPROACH TO By Jack F. Williams, Staff Member (Vol. 16) In 2008, the North Carolina legislature passed the “Protect Children from Sexual Predators Act.” As part of the Act, subsection 14-202.5 banned the use of “commercial social networking Web sites by any registered sex offender.” The statute applied to about “20,000 people in North Carolina” and reports VOLUMES - FIRSTAMENDMENTLAWREVIEW.ORG Volumes. First Amendment Law Review publishes one Volume each year. Each Volume contain three issues; Fall, Spring, and Symposium. Typically, FALR will publish two student pieces and two or three professional pieces in the Fall and Spring issues. CONTACT - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Contact. Please see the following contact information for your specific inquiries: General questions, alumni outreach, symposia, and membership: Ashley Fox, Editor-in-Chief. Article submissions: Lindsay Byers, Chief Articles and Notes Editor. Problems with our website: Maureen Gleason, Online Editor. All other questions: falr@unc.edu. BOOK BANS: FIRST AMENDMENT VIOLATION OF PRISONERS By: Athina Hinson-Boyte Just Mercy In December, the film adaptation of Bryan Stevenson’s book, Just Mercy was released in theaters. It tells the true story of Walter McMillian, a young black man who was sentenced to death for a murder he did not commit. The book shows the injustices and racism of the criminal system VOLUME 18 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 18 Fall Issue. #HECKLED by Josh Blackman. Associate Professor, South Texas College of Law Houston. Free Speech, Fake News, and Democracy by Alvin I. Goldman & Daniel Baker. Alvin I. Goldman is the recently retired Emeritus Board of Governors Professor of Philosophy and Cognitive Science at Rutgers University. FREEDOM OF SPEECH: OFF THE STREET, AND ONTO YOUR SCREEN Freedom of Speech: Off the Street, and Onto Your Screen. December 18, 2020. ~. falrunc. By: Rolf Lundberg, Staff Writer. A. The Alternative Channel. Through the First Amendment, Americans are arguably afforded greater protection of their speech than in any other western democracy. However, those protections are not boundless. COMBATING FAKE NEWS WITH PUBLIC NUISANCE LAW Fake news could be combated with public nuisance law similarly to how Oklahoma combated the opioid crisis if fake news were considered commercial speech. Commercial speech has fewer First Amendment protections than other types of speech and requires less strict review. Courts consider (1) whether the speech is an advertisement;(2) whether the
POLICING GENDER IN VIOLATION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT Policing Gender in Violation of the First Amendment. By Emma Ferriola-Bruckenstein, Staff Member (Vol. 16) Gender and transgender identity has been in the news frequently over the past few years, from the rise of “bathroom bills” like North Carolina’s House Bill 2 PACKINGHAM V. NORTH CAROLINA: COURT PROTECTS SEX OFFENDERS By: Alison J. Rossi Early in summer of 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously ruled that a North Carolina law that banned convicted sex offenders from accessing or using social media websites was unconstitutional. In Packinham v. North Carolina, the Court ruled North Carolina’s law violated the First Amendment. This case has NOT PEACE, BUT A SWORD: JANUS AND THE WEAPONIZING OF FREE By Daniel J. Root The case and the controversy Last June, the Supreme Court in Janus v. AFSCME, Council 31 overturned a forty-one-year-old precedent. At issue was whether public employees who are not union members can be required to pay union dues. Under Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, non-union members could be required to THE EFFECTS OF REED V. TOWN OF GILBERT ON PANHANDLING LAWS The Supreme Court of the United States has never directly spoken on the constitutionality of anti-panhandling ordinances, but Reed v. Town of Gilbert, a 2015 Supreme Court decision concerning church signage, has become “the unexpected reason panhandling bans are being struck down across the country.”. Indeed, one commentator wrote that the FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Mission. Since 2002, the First Amendment Law Review (“FALR”) has sought to “promote and protect the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment through publishing scholarly writings on, and promoting discussion of, issues related to the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.” VOLUME 19 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 19 Fall Issue. Walking Out on Student Speech: The Erosion of Tinker and how Pickering Promises to Restore It by Emily Brown. Legal Fellow, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Misinformation Mayhem: Social Media Platforms’ Efforts to Combat Medical and Political Misinformation by Dawn Carla Nunziato. William Wallace Kirkpatrick Research Professor and Professor of Law, The VOLUMES - FIRSTAMENDMENTLAWREVIEW.ORG Volumes. First Amendment Law Review publishes one Volume each year. Each Volume contain three issues; Fall, Spring, and Symposium. Typically, FALR will publish two student pieces and two or three professional pieces in the Fall and Spring issues. IS TRUMP REALLY GUILTY OF INCITEMENT? By: Hannah Simmons, Staff Member, Vol. 19. On February 13, 2021, former President Donald Trump was acquitted of the impeachment charge alleging that he incited the United States Capitol riots. Even though the Senate did not reach the two-thirds majority needed to convict Trump for his role in inciting the mob to attack the capitol, this does not mean that Trump is not guilty. “PLAY IN THE JOINTS” OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT By: Kristopher L. Caudle* The First Amendment to the United States Constitution provides two fundamental guarantees for all citizens: The government shall not establish an official religion; and the government shall not infringe upon a citizen’s right to freely exercise their chosen religion. However, the Supreme Court continues to recognize areas where there is ample VOLUME 17 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 17 Fall Issue Correcting the Generally Accepted but Unjustified Interpretation of the Free Speech Clause by Michele Cotton Associate Professor and Director of the Legal and Ethical Studies program at the University of Baltimore Yale Gordon College of Arts and Sciences Market Place Theory in the Age of AI Communicators by Jared SchroederAssistant
FULTON AND THE FUTURE OF RELIGIOUS LIBERTY By: Megan Coates, Staff Member, Vol. 19 Introduction The Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia. In this case, a Catholic foster care agency resisted the City’s policy requiring agencies to certify same-sex couples as foster parents. Before reaching the Supreme Court, Fulton was heard at the ThirdCircuit, where
PROTECTING PROTESTORS’ FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS, OR SILENTLY Photo Credit: Courtesy of Stephen Melkisethian. By Sarah Rozek; Staff Member (Vol. 16). Charlottesville, a city in West Central Virginia, has a population of more than 200,000.It was not, however, the city’s size, its great selection of wineries, or its world-class university which made it into the headlines this year.Rather, it was the “Unite the Right” torchlight rally, which started NORTH CAROLINA’S FIRST AMENDMENT: PROVISIONAL PROTECTIONS Photo Credit: Courtesy of Jimmy Emerson, DVM By Adam Griffin; Staff Member (Vol. 16) North Carolina’s First Amendment Before the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, and before the Supreme Court doctrine of incorporation was created to impose the protections of the First Amendment against the State Governments, most State Constitutions had sister provisions that protected PACKINGHAM V. NORTH CAROLINA: A PRECAUTIONARY APPROACH TO By Jack F. Williams, Staff Member (Vol. 16) In 2008, the North Carolina legislature passed the “Protect Children from Sexual Predators Act.” As part of the Act, subsection 14-202.5 banned the use of “commercial social networking Web sites by any registered sex offender.” The statute applied to about “20,000 people in North Carolina” and reports FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Mission. Since 2002, the First Amendment Law Review (“FALR”) has sought to “promote and protect the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment through publishing scholarly writings on, and promoting discussion of, issues related to the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.” VOLUME 19 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 19 Fall Issue. Walking Out on Student Speech: The Erosion of Tinker and how Pickering Promises to Restore It by Emily Brown. Legal Fellow, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Misinformation Mayhem: Social Media Platforms’ Efforts to Combat Medical and Political Misinformation by Dawn Carla Nunziato. William Wallace Kirkpatrick Research Professor and Professor of Law, The VOLUMES - FIRSTAMENDMENTLAWREVIEW.ORG Volumes. First Amendment Law Review publishes one Volume each year. Each Volume contain three issues; Fall, Spring, and Symposium. Typically, FALR will publish two student pieces and two or three professional pieces in the Fall and Spring issues. IS TRUMP REALLY GUILTY OF INCITEMENT? By: Hannah Simmons, Staff Member, Vol. 19. On February 13, 2021, former President Donald Trump was acquitted of the impeachment charge alleging that he incited the United States Capitol riots. Even though the Senate did not reach the two-thirds majority needed to convict Trump for his role in inciting the mob to attack the capitol, this does not mean that Trump is not guilty. “PLAY IN THE JOINTS” OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT By: Kristopher L. Caudle* The First Amendment to the United States Constitution provides two fundamental guarantees for all citizens: The government shall not establish an official religion; and the government shall not infringe upon a citizen’s right to freely exercise their chosen religion. However, the Supreme Court continues to recognize areas where there is ample VOLUME 17 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 17 Fall Issue Correcting the Generally Accepted but Unjustified Interpretation of the Free Speech Clause by Michele Cotton Associate Professor and Director of the Legal and Ethical Studies program at the University of Baltimore Yale Gordon College of Arts and Sciences Market Place Theory in the Age of AI Communicators by Jared SchroederAssistant
FULTON AND THE FUTURE OF RELIGIOUS LIBERTY By: Megan Coates, Staff Member, Vol. 19 Introduction The Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia. In this case, a Catholic foster care agency resisted the City’s policy requiring agencies to certify same-sex couples as foster parents. Before reaching the Supreme Court, Fulton was heard at the ThirdCircuit, where
PROTECTING PROTESTORS’ FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS, OR SILENTLY Photo Credit: Courtesy of Stephen Melkisethian. By Sarah Rozek; Staff Member (Vol. 16). Charlottesville, a city in West Central Virginia, has a population of more than 200,000.It was not, however, the city’s size, its great selection of wineries, or its world-class university which made it into the headlines this year.Rather, it was the “Unite the Right” torchlight rally, which started NORTH CAROLINA’S FIRST AMENDMENT: PROVISIONAL PROTECTIONS Photo Credit: Courtesy of Jimmy Emerson, DVM By Adam Griffin; Staff Member (Vol. 16) North Carolina’s First Amendment Before the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, and before the Supreme Court doctrine of incorporation was created to impose the protections of the First Amendment against the State Governments, most State Constitutions had sister provisions that protected PACKINGHAM V. NORTH CAROLINA: A PRECAUTIONARY APPROACH TO By Jack F. Williams, Staff Member (Vol. 16) In 2008, the North Carolina legislature passed the “Protect Children from Sexual Predators Act.” As part of the Act, subsection 14-202.5 banned the use of “commercial social networking Web sites by any registered sex offender.” The statute applied to about “20,000 people in North Carolina” and reports VOLUMES - FIRSTAMENDMENTLAWREVIEW.ORG Volumes. First Amendment Law Review publishes one Volume each year. Each Volume contain three issues; Fall, Spring, and Symposium. Typically, FALR will publish two student pieces and two or three professional pieces in the Fall and Spring issues. CONTACT - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Contact. Please see the following contact information for your specific inquiries: General questions, alumni outreach, symposia, and membership: Ashley Fox, Editor-in-Chief. Article submissions: Lindsay Byers, Chief Articles and Notes Editor. Problems with our website: Maureen Gleason, Online Editor. All other questions: falr@unc.edu. BOOK BANS: FIRST AMENDMENT VIOLATION OF PRISONERS By: Athina Hinson-Boyte Just Mercy In December, the film adaptation of Bryan Stevenson’s book, Just Mercy was released in theaters. It tells the true story of Walter McMillian, a young black man who was sentenced to death for a murder he did not commit. The book shows the injustices and racism of the criminal system VOLUME 18 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 18 Fall Issue. #HECKLED by Josh Blackman. Associate Professor, South Texas College of Law Houston. Free Speech, Fake News, and Democracy by Alvin I. Goldman & Daniel Baker. Alvin I. Goldman is the recently retired Emeritus Board of Governors Professor of Philosophy and Cognitive Science at Rutgers University. FREEDOM OF SPEECH: OFF THE STREET, AND ONTO YOUR SCREEN Freedom of Speech: Off the Street, and Onto Your Screen. December 18, 2020. ~. falrunc. By: Rolf Lundberg, Staff Writer. A. The Alternative Channel. Through the First Amendment, Americans are arguably afforded greater protection of their speech than in any other western democracy. However, those protections are not boundless. COMBATING FAKE NEWS WITH PUBLIC NUISANCE LAW Fake news could be combated with public nuisance law similarly to how Oklahoma combated the opioid crisis if fake news were considered commercial speech. Commercial speech has fewer First Amendment protections than other types of speech and requires less strict review. Courts consider (1) whether the speech is an advertisement;(2) whether the
POLICING GENDER IN VIOLATION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT Policing Gender in Violation of the First Amendment. By Emma Ferriola-Bruckenstein, Staff Member (Vol. 16) Gender and transgender identity has been in the news frequently over the past few years, from the rise of “bathroom bills” like North Carolina’s House Bill 2 PACKINGHAM V. NORTH CAROLINA: COURT PROTECTS SEX OFFENDERS By: Alison J. Rossi Early in summer of 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously ruled that a North Carolina law that banned convicted sex offenders from accessing or using social media websites was unconstitutional. In Packinham v. North Carolina, the Court ruled North Carolina’s law violated the First Amendment. This case has NOT PEACE, BUT A SWORD: JANUS AND THE WEAPONIZING OF FREE By Daniel J. Root The case and the controversy Last June, the Supreme Court in Janus v. AFSCME, Council 31 overturned a forty-one-year-old precedent. At issue was whether public employees who are not union members can be required to pay union dues. Under Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, non-union members could be required to THE EFFECTS OF REED V. TOWN OF GILBERT ON PANHANDLING LAWS The Supreme Court of the United States has never directly spoken on the constitutionality of anti-panhandling ordinances, but Reed v. Town of Gilbert, a 2015 Supreme Court decision concerning church signage, has become “the unexpected reason panhandling bans are being struck down across the country.”. Indeed, one commentator wrote that the FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Mission. Since 2002, the First Amendment Law Review (“FALR”) has sought to “promote and protect the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment through publishing scholarly writings on, and promoting discussion of, issues related to the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.” VOLUMES - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volumes. First Amendment Law Review publishes one Volume each year. Each Volume contain three issues; Fall, Spring, and Symposium. Typically, FALR will publish two student pieces and two or three professional pieces in the Fall and Spring issues. VOLUME 19 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 19 Fall Issue. Walking Out on Student Speech: The Erosion of Tinker and how Pickering Promises to Restore It by Emily Brown. Legal Fellow, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Misinformation Mayhem: Social Media Platforms’ Efforts to Combat Medical and Political Misinformation by Dawn Carla Nunziato. William Wallace Kirkpatrick Research Professor and Professor of Law, The “PLAY IN THE JOINTS” OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT By: Kristopher L. Caudle* The First Amendment to the United States Constitution provides two fundamental guarantees for all citizens: The government shall not establish an official religion; and the government shall not infringe upon a citizen’s right to freely exercise their chosen religion. However, the Supreme Court continues to recognize areas where there is ample IS TRUMP REALLY GUILTY OF INCITEMENT? By: Hannah Simmons, Staff Member, Vol. 19. On February 13, 2021, former President Donald Trump was acquitted of the impeachment charge alleging that he incited the United States Capitol riots. Even though the Senate did not reach the two-thirds majority needed to convict Trump for his role in inciting the mob to attack the capitol, this does not mean that Trump is not guilty. VOLUME 17 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 17 Fall Issue Correcting the Generally Accepted but Unjustified Interpretation of the Free Speech Clause by Michele Cotton Associate Professor and Director of the Legal and Ethical Studies program at the University of Baltimore Yale Gordon College of Arts and Sciences Market Place Theory in the Age of AI Communicators by Jared SchroederAssistant
FULTON AND THE FUTURE OF RELIGIOUS LIBERTY By: Megan Coates, Staff Member, Vol. 19 Introduction The Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia. In this case, a Catholic foster care agency resisted the City’s policy requiring agencies to certify same-sex couples as foster parents. Before reaching the Supreme Court, Fulton was heard at the ThirdCircuit, where
PROTECTING PROTESTORS’ FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS, OR SILENTLY Photo Credit: Courtesy of Stephen Melkisethian. By Sarah Rozek; Staff Member (Vol. 16). Charlottesville, a city in West Central Virginia, has a population of more than 200,000.It was not, however, the city’s size, its great selection of wineries, or its world-class university which made it into the headlines this year.Rather, it was the “Unite the Right” torchlight rally, which started NORTH CAROLINA’S FIRST AMENDMENT: PROVISIONAL PROTECTIONS Photo Credit: Courtesy of Jimmy Emerson, DVM By Adam Griffin; Staff Member (Vol. 16) North Carolina’s First Amendment Before the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, and before the Supreme Court doctrine of incorporation was created to impose the protections of the First Amendment against the State Governments, most State Constitutions had sister provisions that protected PACKINGHAM V. NORTH CAROLINA: A PRECAUTIONARY APPROACH TO By Jack F. Williams, Staff Member (Vol. 16) In 2008, the North Carolina legislature passed the “Protect Children from Sexual Predators Act.” As part of the Act, subsection 14-202.5 banned the use of “commercial social networking Web sites by any registered sex offender.” The statute applied to about “20,000 people in North Carolina” and reports FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Mission. Since 2002, the First Amendment Law Review (“FALR”) has sought to “promote and protect the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment through publishing scholarly writings on, and promoting discussion of, issues related to the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.” VOLUMES - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volumes. First Amendment Law Review publishes one Volume each year. Each Volume contain three issues; Fall, Spring, and Symposium. Typically, FALR will publish two student pieces and two or three professional pieces in the Fall and Spring issues. VOLUME 19 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 19 Fall Issue. Walking Out on Student Speech: The Erosion of Tinker and how Pickering Promises to Restore It by Emily Brown. Legal Fellow, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Misinformation Mayhem: Social Media Platforms’ Efforts to Combat Medical and Political Misinformation by Dawn Carla Nunziato. William Wallace Kirkpatrick Research Professor and Professor of Law, The “PLAY IN THE JOINTS” OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT By: Kristopher L. Caudle* The First Amendment to the United States Constitution provides two fundamental guarantees for all citizens: The government shall not establish an official religion; and the government shall not infringe upon a citizen’s right to freely exercise their chosen religion. However, the Supreme Court continues to recognize areas where there is ample IS TRUMP REALLY GUILTY OF INCITEMENT? By: Hannah Simmons, Staff Member, Vol. 19. On February 13, 2021, former President Donald Trump was acquitted of the impeachment charge alleging that he incited the United States Capitol riots. Even though the Senate did not reach the two-thirds majority needed to convict Trump for his role in inciting the mob to attack the capitol, this does not mean that Trump is not guilty. VOLUME 17 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 17 Fall Issue Correcting the Generally Accepted but Unjustified Interpretation of the Free Speech Clause by Michele Cotton Associate Professor and Director of the Legal and Ethical Studies program at the University of Baltimore Yale Gordon College of Arts and Sciences Market Place Theory in the Age of AI Communicators by Jared SchroederAssistant
FULTON AND THE FUTURE OF RELIGIOUS LIBERTY By: Megan Coates, Staff Member, Vol. 19 Introduction The Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia. In this case, a Catholic foster care agency resisted the City’s policy requiring agencies to certify same-sex couples as foster parents. Before reaching the Supreme Court, Fulton was heard at the ThirdCircuit, where
PROTECTING PROTESTORS’ FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS, OR SILENTLY Photo Credit: Courtesy of Stephen Melkisethian. By Sarah Rozek; Staff Member (Vol. 16). Charlottesville, a city in West Central Virginia, has a population of more than 200,000.It was not, however, the city’s size, its great selection of wineries, or its world-class university which made it into the headlines this year.Rather, it was the “Unite the Right” torchlight rally, which started NORTH CAROLINA’S FIRST AMENDMENT: PROVISIONAL PROTECTIONS Photo Credit: Courtesy of Jimmy Emerson, DVM By Adam Griffin; Staff Member (Vol. 16) North Carolina’s First Amendment Before the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, and before the Supreme Court doctrine of incorporation was created to impose the protections of the First Amendment against the State Governments, most State Constitutions had sister provisions that protected PACKINGHAM V. NORTH CAROLINA: A PRECAUTIONARY APPROACH TO By Jack F. Williams, Staff Member (Vol. 16) In 2008, the North Carolina legislature passed the “Protect Children from Sexual Predators Act.” As part of the Act, subsection 14-202.5 banned the use of “commercial social networking Web sites by any registered sex offender.” The statute applied to about “20,000 people in North Carolina” and reports VOLUMES - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW First Amendment Law Review publishes one Volume each year. Each Volume contain three issues; Fall, Spring, and Symposium. Typically, FALR will publish two student pieces and two or three professional pieces in the Fall and Spring issues. CONTACT - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Contact. Please see the following contact information for your specific inquiries: General questions, alumni outreach, symposia, and membership: Ashley Fox, Editor-in-Chief. Article submissions: Lindsay Byers, Chief Articles and Notes Editor. Problems with our website: Maureen Gleason, Online Editor. All other questions: falr@unc.edu. VOLUME 18 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 18 Fall Issue. #HECKLED by Josh Blackman. Associate Professor, South Texas College of Law Houston. Free Speech, Fake News, and Democracy by Alvin I. Goldman & Daniel Baker. Alvin I. Goldman is the recently retired Emeritus Board of Governors Professor of Philosophy and Cognitive Science at Rutgers University.ARTICLE SUBMISSIONS
FALR carefully considers all submissions it receives through two main steps. First, our Chief Articles and Notes Editor (“CANE”) assigns the submission to an Articles Editor for an initial review to decide whether he or she recommends the submission for publishing. Second, our CANE sends the submission to the Editor-in-Chief and Executive VOLUME 16 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 16 Fall Issue They Should be Fired: The Social Regulation of Free Speech in the U.S. by Dr. Franciska A. Coleman Professor, Yonsei Law School in Seoul, South Korea Lessons on Political Speech, Academic Freedom, and University Governance from the New North Carolina by Gene Nichol Boyd Tinsley Distinguished Professor of Law, UNC-Chapel HillSchool of Law
BOOK BANS: FIRST AMENDMENT VIOLATION OF PRISONERS By: Athina Hinson-Boyte Just Mercy In December, the film adaptation of Bryan Stevenson’s book, Just Mercy was released in theaters. It tells the true story of Walter McMillian, a young black man who was sentenced to death for a murder he did not commit. The book shows the injustices and racism of the criminal system JOHNNY MAC V. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA: A PASTOR’S BATTLE The State of California: A Pastor’s Battle to Feed His Flock Amid COVID-19. March 5, 2021. ~. falrunc. By: Luke Maher, staff member Vol 19. “We will obey God rather than men. We’re going to leave the results to Him”. These are the words of Grace Community Church head pastor John MacArthur. The person sometimes affectionately referred POLICING GENDER IN VIOLATION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT Policing Gender in Violation of the First Amendment. By Emma Ferriola-Bruckenstein, Staff Member (Vol. 16) Gender and transgender identity has been in the news frequently over the past few years, from the rise of “bathroom bills” like North Carolina’s House Bill 2VOLUME 19 MASTHEAD
Visit the post for more. THE EFFECTS OF REED V. TOWN OF GILBERT ON PANHANDLING LAWS The Supreme Court of the United States has never directly spoken on the constitutionality of anti-panhandling ordinances, but Reed v. Town of Gilbert, a 2015 Supreme Court decision concerning church signage, has become “the unexpected reason panhandling bans are being struck down across the country.”. Indeed, one commentator wrote that the FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Mission. Since 2002, the First Amendment Law Review (“FALR”) has sought to “promote and protect the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment through publishing scholarly writings on, and promoting discussion of, issues related to the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.” VOLUMES - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volumes. First Amendment Law Review publishes one Volume each year. Each Volume contain three issues; Fall, Spring, and Symposium. Typically, FALR will publish two student pieces and two or three professional pieces in the Fall and Spring issues. VOLUME 19 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 19 Fall Issue. Walking Out on Student Speech: The Erosion of Tinker and how Pickering Promises to Restore It by Emily Brown. Legal Fellow, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Misinformation Mayhem: Social Media Platforms’ Efforts to Combat Medical and Political Misinformation by Dawn Carla Nunziato. William Wallace Kirkpatrick Research Professor and Professor of Law, The VOLUME 18 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 18 Fall Issue. #HECKLED by Josh Blackman. Associate Professor, South Texas College of Law Houston. Free Speech, Fake News, and Democracy by Alvin I. Goldman & Daniel Baker. Alvin I. Goldman is the recently retired Emeritus Board of Governors Professor of Philosophy and Cognitive Science at Rutgers University. IS TRUMP REALLY GUILTY OF INCITEMENT? By: Hannah Simmons, Staff Member, Vol. 19. On February 13, 2021, former President Donald Trump was acquitted of the impeachment charge alleging that he incited the United States Capitol riots. Even though the Senate did not reach the two-thirds majority needed to convict Trump for his role in inciting the mob to attack the capitol, this does not mean that Trump is not guilty. VOLUME 17 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 17 Fall Issue Correcting the Generally Accepted but Unjustified Interpretation of the Free Speech Clause by Michele Cotton Associate Professor and Director of the Legal and Ethical Studies program at the University of Baltimore Yale Gordon College of Arts and Sciences Market Place Theory in the Age of AI Communicators by Jared SchroederAssistant
FULTON AND THE FUTURE OF RELIGIOUS LIBERTY By: Megan Coates, Staff Member, Vol. 19 Introduction The Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia. In this case, a Catholic foster care agency resisted the City’s policy requiring agencies to certify same-sex couples as foster parents. Before reaching the Supreme Court, Fulton was heard at the ThirdCircuit, where
PROTECTING PROTESTORS’ FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS, OR SILENTLY Photo Credit: Courtesy of Stephen Melkisethian. By Sarah Rozek; Staff Member (Vol. 16). Charlottesville, a city in West Central Virginia, has a population of more than 200,000.It was not, however, the city’s size, its great selection of wineries, or its world-class university which made it into the headlines this year.Rather, it was the “Unite the Right” torchlight rally, which started NORTH CAROLINA’S FIRST AMENDMENT: PROVISIONAL PROTECTIONS Photo Credit: Courtesy of Jimmy Emerson, DVM By Adam Griffin; Staff Member (Vol. 16) North Carolina’s First Amendment Before the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, and before the Supreme Court doctrine of incorporation was created to impose the protections of the First Amendment against the State Governments, most State Constitutions had sister provisions that protected PACKINGHAM V. NORTH CAROLINA: A PRECAUTIONARY APPROACH TO By Jack F. Williams, Staff Member (Vol. 16) In 2008, the North Carolina legislature passed the “Protect Children from Sexual Predators Act.” As part of the Act, subsection 14-202.5 banned the use of “commercial social networking Web sites by any registered sex offender.” The statute applied to about “20,000 people in North Carolina” and reports FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Mission. Since 2002, the First Amendment Law Review (“FALR”) has sought to “promote and protect the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment through publishing scholarly writings on, and promoting discussion of, issues related to the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.” VOLUMES - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volumes. First Amendment Law Review publishes one Volume each year. Each Volume contain three issues; Fall, Spring, and Symposium. Typically, FALR will publish two student pieces and two or three professional pieces in the Fall and Spring issues. VOLUME 19 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 19 Fall Issue. Walking Out on Student Speech: The Erosion of Tinker and how Pickering Promises to Restore It by Emily Brown. Legal Fellow, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Misinformation Mayhem: Social Media Platforms’ Efforts to Combat Medical and Political Misinformation by Dawn Carla Nunziato. William Wallace Kirkpatrick Research Professor and Professor of Law, The VOLUME 18 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 18 Fall Issue. #HECKLED by Josh Blackman. Associate Professor, South Texas College of Law Houston. Free Speech, Fake News, and Democracy by Alvin I. Goldman & Daniel Baker. Alvin I. Goldman is the recently retired Emeritus Board of Governors Professor of Philosophy and Cognitive Science at Rutgers University. IS TRUMP REALLY GUILTY OF INCITEMENT? By: Hannah Simmons, Staff Member, Vol. 19. On February 13, 2021, former President Donald Trump was acquitted of the impeachment charge alleging that he incited the United States Capitol riots. Even though the Senate did not reach the two-thirds majority needed to convict Trump for his role in inciting the mob to attack the capitol, this does not mean that Trump is not guilty. VOLUME 17 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 17 Fall Issue Correcting the Generally Accepted but Unjustified Interpretation of the Free Speech Clause by Michele Cotton Associate Professor and Director of the Legal and Ethical Studies program at the University of Baltimore Yale Gordon College of Arts and Sciences Market Place Theory in the Age of AI Communicators by Jared SchroederAssistant
FULTON AND THE FUTURE OF RELIGIOUS LIBERTY By: Megan Coates, Staff Member, Vol. 19 Introduction The Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia. In this case, a Catholic foster care agency resisted the City’s policy requiring agencies to certify same-sex couples as foster parents. Before reaching the Supreme Court, Fulton was heard at the ThirdCircuit, where
PROTECTING PROTESTORS’ FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS, OR SILENTLY Photo Credit: Courtesy of Stephen Melkisethian. By Sarah Rozek; Staff Member (Vol. 16). Charlottesville, a city in West Central Virginia, has a population of more than 200,000.It was not, however, the city’s size, its great selection of wineries, or its world-class university which made it into the headlines this year.Rather, it was the “Unite the Right” torchlight rally, which started NORTH CAROLINA’S FIRST AMENDMENT: PROVISIONAL PROTECTIONS Photo Credit: Courtesy of Jimmy Emerson, DVM By Adam Griffin; Staff Member (Vol. 16) North Carolina’s First Amendment Before the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, and before the Supreme Court doctrine of incorporation was created to impose the protections of the First Amendment against the State Governments, most State Constitutions had sister provisions that protected PACKINGHAM V. NORTH CAROLINA: A PRECAUTIONARY APPROACH TO By Jack F. Williams, Staff Member (Vol. 16) In 2008, the North Carolina legislature passed the “Protect Children from Sexual Predators Act.” As part of the Act, subsection 14-202.5 banned the use of “commercial social networking Web sites by any registered sex offender.” The statute applied to about “20,000 people in North Carolina” and reports VOLUMES - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW First Amendment Law Review publishes one Volume each year. Each Volume contain three issues; Fall, Spring, and Symposium. Typically, FALR will publish two student pieces and two or three professional pieces in the Fall and Spring issues. CONTACT - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Contact. Please see the following contact information for your specific inquiries: General questions, alumni outreach, symposia, and membership: Ashley Fox, Editor-in-Chief. Article submissions: Lindsay Byers, Chief Articles and Notes Editor. Problems with our website: Maureen Gleason, Online Editor. All other questions: falr@unc.edu. FIRST AMENDMENT BLOG First Amendment Implications of Curfews During Black Lives Matter Protests. By: Elizabeth Ernest, Staff Member, Vol. 19 Since last May, protests have taken place across the country in response to police brutality against Black Americans. In response, many cities implemented city-wide curfews. In Raleigh, North Carolina, MayorMary-Ann Baldwin
ARTICLE SUBMISSIONS
FALR carefully considers all submissions it receives through two main steps. First, our Chief Articles and Notes Editor (“CANE”) assigns the submission to an Articles Editor for an initial review to decide whether he or she recommends the submission for publishing. Second, our CANE sends the submission to the Editor-in-Chief and Executive VOLUME 16 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 16 Fall Issue They Should be Fired: The Social Regulation of Free Speech in the U.S. by Dr. Franciska A. Coleman Professor, Yonsei Law School in Seoul, South Korea Lessons on Political Speech, Academic Freedom, and University Governance from the New North Carolina by Gene Nichol Boyd Tinsley Distinguished Professor of Law, UNC-Chapel HillSchool of Law
BOOK BANS: FIRST AMENDMENT VIOLATION OF PRISONERS By: Athina Hinson-Boyte Just Mercy In December, the film adaptation of Bryan Stevenson’s book, Just Mercy was released in theaters. It tells the true story of Walter McMillian, a young black man who was sentenced to death for a murder he did not commit. The book shows the injustices and racism of the criminal system POLICING GENDER IN VIOLATION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT Policing Gender in Violation of the First Amendment. By Emma Ferriola-Bruckenstein, Staff Member (Vol. 16) Gender and transgender identity has been in the news frequently over the past few years, from the rise of “bathroom bills” like North Carolina’s House Bill 2 TIPPING THE BALANCE: THE CONSCIENCE RULE, RELIGIOUS By: Tim Sookram On May 21, 2019, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Civil Rights promulgated the final version of the “Conscience Rule,” a regulation aimed at protecting the rights of those who cite religious grounds in refusing to perform or assist with certain health care services. Opponents have decried theVOLUME 19 MASTHEAD
Visit the post for more. THE EFFECTS OF REED V. TOWN OF GILBERT ON PANHANDLING LAWS The Supreme Court of the United States has never directly spoken on the constitutionality of anti-panhandling ordinances, but Reed v. Town of Gilbert, a 2015 Supreme Court decision concerning church signage, has become “the unexpected reason panhandling bans are being struck down across the country.”. Indeed, one commentator wrote that the FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Mission. Since 2002, the First Amendment Law Review (“FALR”) has sought to “promote and protect the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment through publishing scholarly writings on, and promoting discussion of, issues related to the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.” VOLUMES - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volumes. First Amendment Law Review publishes one Volume each year. Each Volume contain three issues; Fall, Spring, and Symposium. Typically, FALR will publish two student pieces and two or three professional pieces in the Fall and Spring issues. VOLUME 19 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 19 Fall Issue. Walking Out on Student Speech: The Erosion of Tinker and how Pickering Promises to Restore It by Emily Brown. Legal Fellow, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Misinformation Mayhem: Social Media Platforms’ Efforts to Combat Medical and Political Misinformation by Dawn Carla Nunziato. William Wallace Kirkpatrick Research Professor and Professor of Law, The IS TRUMP REALLY GUILTY OF INCITEMENT? By: Hannah Simmons, Staff Member, Vol. 19. On February 13, 2021, former President Donald Trump was acquitted of the impeachment charge alleging that he incited the United States Capitol riots. Even though the Senate did not reach the two-thirds majority needed to convict Trump for his role in inciting the mob to attack the capitol, this does not mean that Trump is not guilty. VOLUME 18 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 18 Fall Issue. #HECKLED by Josh Blackman. Associate Professor, South Texas College of Law Houston. Free Speech, Fake News, and Democracy by Alvin I. Goldman & Daniel Baker. Alvin I. Goldman is the recently retired Emeritus Board of Governors Professor of Philosophy and Cognitive Science at Rutgers University. VOLUME 17 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEWNC FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEWFIRST AMENDMENT ARRESTFIRST AMENDMENT CRIMINAL LAWSECTION 230 FIRST AMENDMENTFIRST AMENDMENT LAWYERS ASSOCIATIONWHAT DOES THE FIRSTAMENDMENT MEAN
Volume 17 Fall Issue Correcting the Generally Accepted but Unjustified Interpretation of the Free Speech Clause by Michele Cotton Associate Professor and Director of the Legal and Ethical Studies program at the University of Baltimore Yale Gordon College of Arts and Sciences Market Place Theory in the Age of AI Communicators by Jared SchroederAssistant
FULTON AND THE FUTURE OF RELIGIOUS LIBERTY By: Megan Coates, Staff Member, Vol. 19 Introduction The Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia. In this case, a Catholic foster care agency resisted the City’s policy requiring agencies to certify same-sex couples as foster parents. Before reaching the Supreme Court, Fulton was heard at the ThirdCircuit, where
PROTECTING PROTESTORS’ FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS, OR SILENTLY Photo Credit: Courtesy of Stephen Melkisethian. By Sarah Rozek; Staff Member (Vol. 16). Charlottesville, a city in West Central Virginia, has a population of more than 200,000.It was not, however, the city’s size, its great selection of wineries, or its world-class university which made it into the headlines this year.Rather, it was the “Unite the Right” torchlight rally, which started NORTH CAROLINA’S FIRST AMENDMENT: PROVISIONAL PROTECTIONSFIRST AMENDMENT CONSTITUTION PDFTHE FIRST AMENDMENTPRINT US CONSTITUTION FIRST AMENDMENTNORTH CAROLINA FREEDOMNORTH CAROLINA FREEDOM PARKNORTH CAROLINA FREEDOM PARK RALEIGH Photo Credit: Courtesy of Jimmy Emerson, DVM By Adam Griffin; Staff Member (Vol. 16) North Carolina’s First Amendment Before the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, and before the Supreme Court doctrine of incorporation was created to impose the protections of the First Amendment against the State Governments, most State Constitutions had sister provisions that protected PACKINGHAM V. NORTH CAROLINA: A PRECAUTIONARY APPROACH TO By Jack F. Williams, Staff Member (Vol. 16) In 2008, the North Carolina legislature passed the “Protect Children from Sexual Predators Act.” As part of the Act, subsection 14-202.5 banned the use of “commercial social networking Web sites by any registered sex offender.” The statute applied to about “20,000 people in North Carolina” and reports FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Mission. Since 2002, the First Amendment Law Review (“FALR”) has sought to “promote and protect the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment through publishing scholarly writings on, and promoting discussion of, issues related to the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.” VOLUMES - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volumes. First Amendment Law Review publishes one Volume each year. Each Volume contain three issues; Fall, Spring, and Symposium. Typically, FALR will publish two student pieces and two or three professional pieces in the Fall and Spring issues. VOLUME 19 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 19 Fall Issue. Walking Out on Student Speech: The Erosion of Tinker and how Pickering Promises to Restore It by Emily Brown. Legal Fellow, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Misinformation Mayhem: Social Media Platforms’ Efforts to Combat Medical and Political Misinformation by Dawn Carla Nunziato. William Wallace Kirkpatrick Research Professor and Professor of Law, The IS TRUMP REALLY GUILTY OF INCITEMENT? By: Hannah Simmons, Staff Member, Vol. 19. On February 13, 2021, former President Donald Trump was acquitted of the impeachment charge alleging that he incited the United States Capitol riots. Even though the Senate did not reach the two-thirds majority needed to convict Trump for his role in inciting the mob to attack the capitol, this does not mean that Trump is not guilty. VOLUME 18 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 18 Fall Issue. #HECKLED by Josh Blackman. Associate Professor, South Texas College of Law Houston. Free Speech, Fake News, and Democracy by Alvin I. Goldman & Daniel Baker. Alvin I. Goldman is the recently retired Emeritus Board of Governors Professor of Philosophy and Cognitive Science at Rutgers University. VOLUME 17 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEWNC FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEWFIRST AMENDMENT ARRESTFIRST AMENDMENT CRIMINAL LAWSECTION 230 FIRST AMENDMENTFIRST AMENDMENT LAWYERS ASSOCIATIONWHAT DOES THE FIRSTAMENDMENT MEAN
Volume 17 Fall Issue Correcting the Generally Accepted but Unjustified Interpretation of the Free Speech Clause by Michele Cotton Associate Professor and Director of the Legal and Ethical Studies program at the University of Baltimore Yale Gordon College of Arts and Sciences Market Place Theory in the Age of AI Communicators by Jared SchroederAssistant
FULTON AND THE FUTURE OF RELIGIOUS LIBERTY By: Megan Coates, Staff Member, Vol. 19 Introduction The Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia. In this case, a Catholic foster care agency resisted the City’s policy requiring agencies to certify same-sex couples as foster parents. Before reaching the Supreme Court, Fulton was heard at the ThirdCircuit, where
PROTECTING PROTESTORS’ FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS, OR SILENTLY Photo Credit: Courtesy of Stephen Melkisethian. By Sarah Rozek; Staff Member (Vol. 16). Charlottesville, a city in West Central Virginia, has a population of more than 200,000.It was not, however, the city’s size, its great selection of wineries, or its world-class university which made it into the headlines this year.Rather, it was the “Unite the Right” torchlight rally, which started NORTH CAROLINA’S FIRST AMENDMENT: PROVISIONAL PROTECTIONSFIRST AMENDMENT CONSTITUTION PDFTHE FIRST AMENDMENTPRINT US CONSTITUTION FIRST AMENDMENTNORTH CAROLINA FREEDOMNORTH CAROLINA FREEDOM PARKNORTH CAROLINA FREEDOM PARK RALEIGH Photo Credit: Courtesy of Jimmy Emerson, DVM By Adam Griffin; Staff Member (Vol. 16) North Carolina’s First Amendment Before the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, and before the Supreme Court doctrine of incorporation was created to impose the protections of the First Amendment against the State Governments, most State Constitutions had sister provisions that protected PACKINGHAM V. NORTH CAROLINA: A PRECAUTIONARY APPROACH TO By Jack F. Williams, Staff Member (Vol. 16) In 2008, the North Carolina legislature passed the “Protect Children from Sexual Predators Act.” As part of the Act, subsection 14-202.5 banned the use of “commercial social networking Web sites by any registered sex offender.” The statute applied to about “20,000 people in North Carolina” and reports VOLUMES - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW First Amendment Law Review publishes one Volume each year. Each Volume contain three issues; Fall, Spring, and Symposium. Typically, FALR will publish two student pieces and two or three professional pieces in the Fall and Spring issues. CONTACT - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Contact. Please see the following contact information for your specific inquiries: General questions, alumni outreach, symposia, and membership: Ashley Fox, Editor-in-Chief. Article submissions: Lindsay Byers, Chief Articles and Notes Editor. Problems with our website: Maureen Gleason, Online Editor. All other questions: falr@unc.edu. FIRST AMENDMENT BLOG First Amendment Implications of Curfews During Black Lives Matter Protests. By: Elizabeth Ernest, Staff Member, Vol. 19 Since last May, protests have taken place across the country in response to police brutality against Black Americans. In response, many cities implemented city-wide curfews. In Raleigh, North Carolina, MayorMary-Ann Baldwin
ARTICLE SUBMISSIONS
FALR carefully considers all submissions it receives through two main steps. First, our Chief Articles and Notes Editor (“CANE”) assigns the submission to an Articles Editor for an initial review to decide whether he or she recommends the submission for publishing. Second, our CANE sends the submission to the Editor-in-Chief and Executive VOLUME 16 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 16 Fall Issue They Should be Fired: The Social Regulation of Free Speech in the U.S. by Dr. Franciska A. Coleman Professor, Yonsei Law School in Seoul, South Korea Lessons on Political Speech, Academic Freedom, and University Governance from the New North Carolina by Gene Nichol Boyd Tinsley Distinguished Professor of Law, UNC-Chapel HillSchool of Law
BOOK BANS: FIRST AMENDMENT VIOLATION OF PRISONERS By: Athina Hinson-Boyte Just Mercy In December, the film adaptation of Bryan Stevenson’s book, Just Mercy was released in theaters. It tells the true story of Walter McMillian, a young black man who was sentenced to death for a murder he did not commit. The book shows the injustices and racism of the criminal system POLICING GENDER IN VIOLATION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT Policing Gender in Violation of the First Amendment. By Emma Ferriola-Bruckenstein, Staff Member (Vol. 16) Gender and transgender identity has been in the news frequently over the past few years, from the rise of “bathroom bills” like North Carolina’s House Bill 2 TIPPING THE BALANCE: THE CONSCIENCE RULE, RELIGIOUS By: Tim Sookram On May 21, 2019, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Civil Rights promulgated the final version of the “Conscience Rule,” a regulation aimed at protecting the rights of those who cite religious grounds in refusing to perform or assist with certain health care services. Opponents have decried theVOLUME 19 MASTHEAD
Visit the post for more. THE EFFECTS OF REED V. TOWN OF GILBERT ON PANHANDLING LAWS The Supreme Court of the United States has never directly spoken on the constitutionality of anti-panhandling ordinances, but Reed v. Town of Gilbert, a 2015 Supreme Court decision concerning church signage, has become “the unexpected reason panhandling bans are being struck down across the country.”. Indeed, one commentator wrote that the FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Mission. Since 2002, the First Amendment Law Review (“FALR”) has sought to “promote and protect the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment through publishing scholarly writings on, and promoting discussion of, issues related to the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.” VOLUMES - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW First Amendment Law Review publishes one Volume each year. Each Volume contain three issues; Fall, Spring, and Symposium. Typically, FALR will publish two student pieces and two or three professional pieces in the Fall and Spring issues. VOLUME 19 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 19 Fall Issue. Walking Out on Student Speech: The Erosion of Tinker and how Pickering Promises to Restore It by Emily Brown. Legal Fellow, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Misinformation Mayhem: Social Media Platforms’ Efforts to Combat Medical and Political Misinformation by Dawn Carla Nunziato. William Wallace Kirkpatrick Research Professor and Professor of Law, The IS TRUMP REALLY GUILTY OF INCITEMENT? By: Hannah Simmons, Staff Member, Vol. 19. On February 13, 2021, former President Donald Trump was acquitted of the impeachment charge alleging that he incited the United States Capitol riots. Even though the Senate did not reach the two-thirds majority needed to convict Trump for his role in inciting the mob to attack the capitol, this does not mean that Trump is not guilty. VOLUME 18 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 18 Fall Issue. #HECKLED by Josh Blackman. Associate Professor, South Texas College of Law Houston. Free Speech, Fake News, and Democracy by Alvin I. Goldman & Daniel Baker. Alvin I. Goldman is the recently retired Emeritus Board of Governors Professor of Philosophy and Cognitive Science at Rutgers University. VOLUME 17 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEWNC FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEWFIRST AMENDMENT ARRESTFIRST AMENDMENT CRIMINAL LAWSECTION 230 FIRST AMENDMENTFIRST AMENDMENT LAWYERS ASSOCIATIONWHAT DOES THE FIRSTAMENDMENT MEAN
Volume 17 Fall Issue Correcting the Generally Accepted but Unjustified Interpretation of the Free Speech Clause by Michele Cotton Associate Professor and Director of the Legal and Ethical Studies program at the University of Baltimore Yale Gordon College of Arts and Sciences Market Place Theory in the Age of AI Communicators by Jared SchroederAssistant
FULTON AND THE FUTURE OF RELIGIOUS LIBERTY By: Megan Coates, Staff Member, Vol. 19 Introduction The Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia. In this case, a Catholic foster care agency resisted the City’s policy requiring agencies to certify same-sex couples as foster parents. Before reaching the Supreme Court, Fulton was heard at the ThirdCircuit, where
PROTECTING PROTESTORS’ FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS, OR SILENTLY Photo Credit: Courtesy of Stephen Melkisethian. By Sarah Rozek; Staff Member (Vol. 16). Charlottesville, a city in West Central Virginia, has a population of more than 200,000.It was not, however, the city’s size, its great selection of wineries, or its world-class university which made it into the headlines this year.Rather, it was the “Unite the Right” torchlight rally, which started NORTH CAROLINA’S FIRST AMENDMENT: PROVISIONAL PROTECTIONSFIRST AMENDMENT CONSTITUTION PDFTHE FIRST AMENDMENTPRINT US CONSTITUTION FIRST AMENDMENTNORTH CAROLINA FREEDOMNORTH CAROLINA FREEDOM PARKNORTH CAROLINA FREEDOM PARK RALEIGH Photo Credit: Courtesy of Jimmy Emerson, DVM By Adam Griffin; Staff Member (Vol. 16) North Carolina’s First Amendment Before the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, and before the Supreme Court doctrine of incorporation was created to impose the protections of the First Amendment against the State Governments, most State Constitutions had sister provisions that protected PACKINGHAM V. NORTH CAROLINA: A PRECAUTIONARY APPROACH TO By Jack F. Williams, Staff Member (Vol. 16) In 2008, the North Carolina legislature passed the “Protect Children from Sexual Predators Act.” As part of the Act, subsection 14-202.5 banned the use of “commercial social networking Web sites by any registered sex offender.” The statute applied to about “20,000 people in North Carolina” and reports FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Mission. Since 2002, the First Amendment Law Review (“FALR”) has sought to “promote and protect the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment through publishing scholarly writings on, and promoting discussion of, issues related to the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.” VOLUMES - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW First Amendment Law Review publishes one Volume each year. Each Volume contain three issues; Fall, Spring, and Symposium. Typically, FALR will publish two student pieces and two or three professional pieces in the Fall and Spring issues. VOLUME 19 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 19 Fall Issue. Walking Out on Student Speech: The Erosion of Tinker and how Pickering Promises to Restore It by Emily Brown. Legal Fellow, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Misinformation Mayhem: Social Media Platforms’ Efforts to Combat Medical and Political Misinformation by Dawn Carla Nunziato. William Wallace Kirkpatrick Research Professor and Professor of Law, The IS TRUMP REALLY GUILTY OF INCITEMENT? By: Hannah Simmons, Staff Member, Vol. 19. On February 13, 2021, former President Donald Trump was acquitted of the impeachment charge alleging that he incited the United States Capitol riots. Even though the Senate did not reach the two-thirds majority needed to convict Trump for his role in inciting the mob to attack the capitol, this does not mean that Trump is not guilty. VOLUME 18 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 18 Fall Issue. #HECKLED by Josh Blackman. Associate Professor, South Texas College of Law Houston. Free Speech, Fake News, and Democracy by Alvin I. Goldman & Daniel Baker. Alvin I. Goldman is the recently retired Emeritus Board of Governors Professor of Philosophy and Cognitive Science at Rutgers University. VOLUME 17 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEWNC FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEWFIRST AMENDMENT ARRESTFIRST AMENDMENT CRIMINAL LAWSECTION 230 FIRST AMENDMENTFIRST AMENDMENT LAWYERS ASSOCIATIONWHAT DOES THE FIRSTAMENDMENT MEAN
Volume 17 Fall Issue Correcting the Generally Accepted but Unjustified Interpretation of the Free Speech Clause by Michele Cotton Associate Professor and Director of the Legal and Ethical Studies program at the University of Baltimore Yale Gordon College of Arts and Sciences Market Place Theory in the Age of AI Communicators by Jared SchroederAssistant
FULTON AND THE FUTURE OF RELIGIOUS LIBERTY By: Megan Coates, Staff Member, Vol. 19 Introduction The Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia. In this case, a Catholic foster care agency resisted the City’s policy requiring agencies to certify same-sex couples as foster parents. Before reaching the Supreme Court, Fulton was heard at the ThirdCircuit, where
PROTECTING PROTESTORS’ FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS, OR SILENTLY Photo Credit: Courtesy of Stephen Melkisethian. By Sarah Rozek; Staff Member (Vol. 16). Charlottesville, a city in West Central Virginia, has a population of more than 200,000.It was not, however, the city’s size, its great selection of wineries, or its world-class university which made it into the headlines this year.Rather, it was the “Unite the Right” torchlight rally, which started NORTH CAROLINA’S FIRST AMENDMENT: PROVISIONAL PROTECTIONSFIRST AMENDMENT CONSTITUTION PDFTHE FIRST AMENDMENTPRINT US CONSTITUTION FIRST AMENDMENTNORTH CAROLINA FREEDOMNORTH CAROLINA FREEDOM PARKNORTH CAROLINA FREEDOM PARK RALEIGH Photo Credit: Courtesy of Jimmy Emerson, DVM By Adam Griffin; Staff Member (Vol. 16) North Carolina’s First Amendment Before the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, and before the Supreme Court doctrine of incorporation was created to impose the protections of the First Amendment against the State Governments, most State Constitutions had sister provisions that protected PACKINGHAM V. NORTH CAROLINA: A PRECAUTIONARY APPROACH TO By Jack F. Williams, Staff Member (Vol. 16) In 2008, the North Carolina legislature passed the “Protect Children from Sexual Predators Act.” As part of the Act, subsection 14-202.5 banned the use of “commercial social networking Web sites by any registered sex offender.” The statute applied to about “20,000 people in North Carolina” and reports VOLUMES - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW First Amendment Law Review publishes one Volume each year. Each Volume contain three issues; Fall, Spring, and Symposium. Typically, FALR will publish two student pieces and two or three professional pieces in the Fall and Spring issues. CONTACT - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Please see the following contact information for your specific inquiries: General questions, alumni outreach, symposia, and membership: Ashley Fox, Editor-in-Chief Article submissions: Lindsay Byers, Chief Articles and Notes Editor Problems with our website: Maureen Gleason, Online Editor All other questions: falr@unc.edu FIRST AMENDMENT BLOG By: Andrew Coyle, Staff Member, Vol. 19 Teachers as “Ministers” In its recent opinion in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrisey-Berru, the U.S. Supreme Court changed the “ministerial exception” of the religion clauses of the First Amendment.ARTICLE SUBMISSIONS
How to Submit The First Amendment Law Review (“FALR”) accepts submissions on a rolling basis through three platforms: • Scholastica ( • ExpressO ( • Via Email (falr@unc.edu) Please feelfree to sen
VOLUME 16 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 16 Fall Issue They Should be Fired: The Social Regulation of Free Speech in the U.S. by Dr. Franciska A. Coleman Professor, Yonsei Law School in Seoul, South Korea Lessons on Political Speech, Academic Freedom, and University Governance from the New North Carolina by Gene Nichol Boyd Tinsley Distinguished Professor of Law, UNC-Chapel HillSchool of Law
BOOK BANS: FIRST AMENDMENT VIOLATION OF PRISONERS By: Athina Hinson-Boyte Just Mercy In December, the film adaptation of Bryan Stevenson’s book, Just Mercy was released in theaters. It tells the true story of Walter McMillian, a young black man who was sentenced to death for a murder he did not commit. The book shows the injustices and racism of the criminal system TIPPING THE BALANCE: THE CONSCIENCE RULE, RELIGIOUS By: Tim Sookram On May 21, 2019, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Civil Rights promulgated the final version of the “Conscience Rule,” a regulation aimed at protecting the rights of those who cite religious grounds in refusing to perform or assist with certain health care services. Opponents have decried the POLICING GENDER IN VIOLATION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT Photo Credit: Courtesy of torbakhopper By Emma Ferriola-Bruckenstein, Staff Member (Vol. 16) Gender and transgender identity has been in the news frequently over the past few years, from the rise of “bathroom bills” like North Carolina’s House Bill 2 to the threat of a “trans ban” in the military. These issues have generated headlinesaround
VOLUME 19 MASTHEAD
Visit the post for more. THE EFFECTS OF REED V. TOWN OF GILBERT ON PANHANDLING LAWS Photo Credit: Courtesy of Quinn Dombrowski By Megan Shook, Staff Member (Vol. 16) An old English nursery rhyme illustrates an early antipathy to beggars: Hark! Hark! The dogs do bark; The beggars are coming to town. Some gave them white bread; And some gave them brown, And some gave them a good horsewhip, And sent FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Mission. Since 2002, the First Amendment Law Review (“FALR”) has sought to “promote and protect the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment through publishing scholarly writings on, and promoting discussion of, issues related to the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.” VOLUMES - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW First Amendment Law Review publishes one Volume each year. Each Volume contain three issues; Fall, Spring, and Symposium. Typically, FALR will publish two student pieces and two or three professional pieces in the Fall and Spring issues. VOLUME 19 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 19 Fall Issue. Walking Out on Student Speech: The Erosion of Tinker and how Pickering Promises to Restore It by Emily Brown. Legal Fellow, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Misinformation Mayhem: Social Media Platforms’ Efforts to Combat Medical and Political Misinformation by Dawn Carla Nunziato. William Wallace Kirkpatrick Research Professor and Professor of Law, The IS TRUMP REALLY GUILTY OF INCITEMENT? By: Hannah Simmons, Staff Member, Vol. 19. On February 13, 2021, former President Donald Trump was acquitted of the impeachment charge alleging that he incited the United States Capitol riots. Even though the Senate did not reach the two-thirds majority needed to convict Trump for his role in inciting the mob to attack the capitol, this does not mean that Trump is not guilty. VOLUME 18 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 18 Fall Issue. #HECKLED by Josh Blackman. Associate Professor, South Texas College of Law Houston. Free Speech, Fake News, and Democracy by Alvin I. Goldman & Daniel Baker. Alvin I. Goldman is the recently retired Emeritus Board of Governors Professor of Philosophy and Cognitive Science at Rutgers University. VOLUME 17 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEWNC FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEWFIRST AMENDMENT ARRESTFIRST AMENDMENT CRIMINAL LAWSECTION 230 FIRST AMENDMENTFIRST AMENDMENT LAWYERS ASSOCIATIONWHAT DOES THE FIRSTAMENDMENT MEAN
Volume 17 Fall Issue Correcting the Generally Accepted but Unjustified Interpretation of the Free Speech Clause by Michele Cotton Associate Professor and Director of the Legal and Ethical Studies program at the University of Baltimore Yale Gordon College of Arts and Sciences Market Place Theory in the Age of AI Communicators by Jared SchroederAssistant
FULTON AND THE FUTURE OF RELIGIOUS LIBERTY By: Megan Coates, Staff Member, Vol. 19 Introduction The Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia. In this case, a Catholic foster care agency resisted the City’s policy requiring agencies to certify same-sex couples as foster parents. Before reaching the Supreme Court, Fulton was heard at the ThirdCircuit, where
PROTECTING PROTESTORS’ FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS, OR SILENTLY Photo Credit: Courtesy of Stephen Melkisethian. By Sarah Rozek; Staff Member (Vol. 16). Charlottesville, a city in West Central Virginia, has a population of more than 200,000.It was not, however, the city’s size, its great selection of wineries, or its world-class university which made it into the headlines this year.Rather, it was the “Unite the Right” torchlight rally, which started NORTH CAROLINA’S FIRST AMENDMENT: PROVISIONAL PROTECTIONSFIRST AMENDMENT CONSTITUTION PDFTHE FIRST AMENDMENTPRINT US CONSTITUTION FIRST AMENDMENTNORTH CAROLINA FREEDOMNORTH CAROLINA FREEDOM PARKNORTH CAROLINA FREEDOM PARK RALEIGH Photo Credit: Courtesy of Jimmy Emerson, DVM By Adam Griffin; Staff Member (Vol. 16) North Carolina’s First Amendment Before the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, and before the Supreme Court doctrine of incorporation was created to impose the protections of the First Amendment against the State Governments, most State Constitutions had sister provisions that protected PACKINGHAM V. NORTH CAROLINA: A PRECAUTIONARY APPROACH TO By Jack F. Williams, Staff Member (Vol. 16) In 2008, the North Carolina legislature passed the “Protect Children from Sexual Predators Act.” As part of the Act, subsection 14-202.5 banned the use of “commercial social networking Web sites by any registered sex offender.” The statute applied to about “20,000 people in North Carolina” and reports FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Mission. Since 2002, the First Amendment Law Review (“FALR”) has sought to “promote and protect the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment through publishing scholarly writings on, and promoting discussion of, issues related to the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.” VOLUMES - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW First Amendment Law Review publishes one Volume each year. Each Volume contain three issues; Fall, Spring, and Symposium. Typically, FALR will publish two student pieces and two or three professional pieces in the Fall and Spring issues. VOLUME 19 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 19 Fall Issue. Walking Out on Student Speech: The Erosion of Tinker and how Pickering Promises to Restore It by Emily Brown. Legal Fellow, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Misinformation Mayhem: Social Media Platforms’ Efforts to Combat Medical and Political Misinformation by Dawn Carla Nunziato. William Wallace Kirkpatrick Research Professor and Professor of Law, The IS TRUMP REALLY GUILTY OF INCITEMENT? By: Hannah Simmons, Staff Member, Vol. 19. On February 13, 2021, former President Donald Trump was acquitted of the impeachment charge alleging that he incited the United States Capitol riots. Even though the Senate did not reach the two-thirds majority needed to convict Trump for his role in inciting the mob to attack the capitol, this does not mean that Trump is not guilty. VOLUME 18 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 18 Fall Issue. #HECKLED by Josh Blackman. Associate Professor, South Texas College of Law Houston. Free Speech, Fake News, and Democracy by Alvin I. Goldman & Daniel Baker. Alvin I. Goldman is the recently retired Emeritus Board of Governors Professor of Philosophy and Cognitive Science at Rutgers University. VOLUME 17 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEWNC FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEWFIRST AMENDMENT ARRESTFIRST AMENDMENT CRIMINAL LAWSECTION 230 FIRST AMENDMENTFIRST AMENDMENT LAWYERS ASSOCIATIONWHAT DOES THE FIRSTAMENDMENT MEAN
Volume 17 Fall Issue Correcting the Generally Accepted but Unjustified Interpretation of the Free Speech Clause by Michele Cotton Associate Professor and Director of the Legal and Ethical Studies program at the University of Baltimore Yale Gordon College of Arts and Sciences Market Place Theory in the Age of AI Communicators by Jared SchroederAssistant
FULTON AND THE FUTURE OF RELIGIOUS LIBERTY By: Megan Coates, Staff Member, Vol. 19 Introduction The Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia. In this case, a Catholic foster care agency resisted the City’s policy requiring agencies to certify same-sex couples as foster parents. Before reaching the Supreme Court, Fulton was heard at the ThirdCircuit, where
PROTECTING PROTESTORS’ FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS, OR SILENTLY Photo Credit: Courtesy of Stephen Melkisethian. By Sarah Rozek; Staff Member (Vol. 16). Charlottesville, a city in West Central Virginia, has a population of more than 200,000.It was not, however, the city’s size, its great selection of wineries, or its world-class university which made it into the headlines this year.Rather, it was the “Unite the Right” torchlight rally, which started NORTH CAROLINA’S FIRST AMENDMENT: PROVISIONAL PROTECTIONSFIRST AMENDMENT CONSTITUTION PDFTHE FIRST AMENDMENTPRINT US CONSTITUTION FIRST AMENDMENTNORTH CAROLINA FREEDOMNORTH CAROLINA FREEDOM PARKNORTH CAROLINA FREEDOM PARK RALEIGH Photo Credit: Courtesy of Jimmy Emerson, DVM By Adam Griffin; Staff Member (Vol. 16) North Carolina’s First Amendment Before the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, and before the Supreme Court doctrine of incorporation was created to impose the protections of the First Amendment against the State Governments, most State Constitutions had sister provisions that protected PACKINGHAM V. NORTH CAROLINA: A PRECAUTIONARY APPROACH TO By Jack F. Williams, Staff Member (Vol. 16) In 2008, the North Carolina legislature passed the “Protect Children from Sexual Predators Act.” As part of the Act, subsection 14-202.5 banned the use of “commercial social networking Web sites by any registered sex offender.” The statute applied to about “20,000 people in North Carolina” and reports VOLUMES - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW First Amendment Law Review publishes one Volume each year. Each Volume contain three issues; Fall, Spring, and Symposium. Typically, FALR will publish two student pieces and two or three professional pieces in the Fall and Spring issues. CONTACT - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Please see the following contact information for your specific inquiries: General questions, alumni outreach, symposia, and membership: Ashley Fox, Editor-in-Chief Article submissions: Lindsay Byers, Chief Articles and Notes Editor Problems with our website: Maureen Gleason, Online Editor All other questions: falr@unc.edu FIRST AMENDMENT BLOG By: Andrew Coyle, Staff Member, Vol. 19 Teachers as “Ministers” In its recent opinion in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrisey-Berru, the U.S. Supreme Court changed the “ministerial exception” of the religion clauses of the First Amendment.ARTICLE SUBMISSIONS
How to Submit The First Amendment Law Review (“FALR”) accepts submissions on a rolling basis through three platforms: • Scholastica ( • ExpressO ( • Via Email (falr@unc.edu) Please feelfree to sen
VOLUME 16 - FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 16 Fall Issue They Should be Fired: The Social Regulation of Free Speech in the U.S. by Dr. Franciska A. Coleman Professor, Yonsei Law School in Seoul, South Korea Lessons on Political Speech, Academic Freedom, and University Governance from the New North Carolina by Gene Nichol Boyd Tinsley Distinguished Professor of Law, UNC-Chapel HillSchool of Law
BOOK BANS: FIRST AMENDMENT VIOLATION OF PRISONERS By: Athina Hinson-Boyte Just Mercy In December, the film adaptation of Bryan Stevenson’s book, Just Mercy was released in theaters. It tells the true story of Walter McMillian, a young black man who was sentenced to death for a murder he did not commit. The book shows the injustices and racism of the criminal system TIPPING THE BALANCE: THE CONSCIENCE RULE, RELIGIOUS By: Tim Sookram On May 21, 2019, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Civil Rights promulgated the final version of the “Conscience Rule,” a regulation aimed at protecting the rights of those who cite religious grounds in refusing to perform or assist with certain health care services. Opponents have decried the POLICING GENDER IN VIOLATION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT Photo Credit: Courtesy of torbakhopper By Emma Ferriola-Bruckenstein, Staff Member (Vol. 16) Gender and transgender identity has been in the news frequently over the past few years, from the rise of “bathroom bills” like North Carolina’s House Bill 2 to the threat of a “trans ban” in the military. These issues have generated headlinesaround
VOLUME 19 MASTHEAD
Visit the post for more. THE EFFECTS OF REED V. TOWN OF GILBERT ON PANHANDLING LAWS Photo Credit: Courtesy of Quinn Dombrowski By Megan Shook, Staff Member (Vol. 16) An old English nursery rhyme illustrates an early antipathy to beggars: Hark! Hark! The dogs do bark; The beggars are coming to town. Some gave them white bread; And some gave them brown, And some gave them a good horsewhip, And sentSkip to content
Menu
* About
* First Amendment Law Review* Mastheads
* Volume 17 Masthead * Volume 16 Masthead * Volume 15 Masthead * Volume 14 Masthead * Volume 13 Masthead* More Mastheads
* Leadership
* Volume 17
* Past Volumes
* Volume 16
* Volume 15
* Volume 14
* More Volumes
* Annual Symposium
* FALR Symposium 2019 * FALR Symposium 2018* Past Symposia
* FALR Student Blog
* Submissions
* Contact
ABOUT THE FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEWMISSION
Since 2002, the First Amendment Law Review (“FALR”) has sought to “promote and protect the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment through publishing scholarly writings on, and promoting discussion of, issues related to the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.” To accomplish this mission, FALR performs three primary duties.PUBLICATIONS
First, FALR publishes professional and student articles for the benefit of scholars and practitioners. Contributions are composed of scholarly pieces, symposium papers, and novel, interesting essays regarding the First Amendment. All articles pass a rigorous cite-checking and editing process through our Staff Members, Editorial Board, and Executive Board. FALR publishes Fall, Winter/Symposium, and Spring issues. They are made available both on the FALR website and in legal databases after publication. All three issues are normally published in one annual volume at the end of the Spring semester.SYMPOSIA
Second, FALR holds an annual symposium every Fall to gather together renowned scholars to debate and discuss current issues of First Amendment Law. In the past, scholars have analyzed Fake News, Free Speech and Higher Education, as well as, Net Neutrality and the FirstAmendment.
ONLINE PRESENCE
Third, FALR takes full advantage of the Internet Age to reach a broader audience. FALR regularly publishes First Amendment Newsflashes and student-written blog posts. The bi-weekly Newsflashes serve to highlight recent high-profile First Amendment news stories in a quick, one-stop-shop format. The blog posts are written by our Staff Members and serve as an opportunity for them to write about a First Amendment topic of interest or current event in a more casual style than FALR’s normal scholarly publications. Additionally, FALR maintains a presence on social media sites including Facebook and Twitter. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION For more information or to submit an article, please refer to our Submissions or Contact tabs. Welcome to the wonderful world of FirstAmendment law!
WordPress.com .
* Follow
*
* firstamendmentlawreview.org* Customize
* Follow
* Sign up
* Log in
* Copy shortlink
* Report this content * Manage subscriptions* Collapse this bar
Details
Copyright © 2024 ArchiveBay.com. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | DMCA | 2021 | Feedback | Advertising | RSS 2.0