Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
More Annotations
A complete backup of explicithistoire.wordpress.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of xalxalmektebi.blogspot.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of thebellyguide.tumblr.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of blogdoshinhents.blogspot.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of yaoihime.blogspot.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of czechgaysolarium.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Favourite Annotations
A complete backup of https://chinaq.tv/cn180625/33.html
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://notopening.com/site/sggirls.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://www.qingse.one/view/2840.html
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://www.hungama.com/album/kudrat-1981/1843666/
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://himemix.com/teigaku/model/no/2447
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://libros.plus/astur/
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://www.mundotecnico.info/viewtopic.php?t=3402
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://himemix.com/teigaku/model/no/2472
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Text
definition.
2. A ONLY IF B
4. INDEPENDENT EVENTS 4. Independent Events. Independence is a very important concept in probability theory.. The basic idea is straightforward. Two events are said to be independent if the occurrence of one doesn’t influence the probability of the occurrence of the other. TYPES OF NORMATIVE CLAIMS: (V) MORAL CLAIMS Principles and Applications. Let’s consider the last example we gave of a normative claim: “The State should not have the right to take the life of one of its citizens as punishment for a crime.” SCRIVENER ESSAY TEMPLATE The zip file above is an archive file, a container for other files. When you download it and double-click on it, it will extract a folder. Inside the folder are two Scrivener files. QUIZ: STRONG VS WEAK ARGUMENTS Learn the fundamental concepts for identifying and evaluating good andbad arguments.
ISSUES WITH TRANSLATING CONDITIONALS: "IF A THEN B" 2. CATEGORIZING FALLACIES: PROS AND CONS 2. Categorizing Fallacies: Pros and Cons. Fallacies are often categorized into different groups or families. We’ve already seen one type of categorization, between HOME | THE CRITICAL THINKER ACADEMYABOUTALL COURSESCONTACTIS YOUR BRAIN A COMPUTERWHERE TO STARTWHAT IS A GOOD ARGUMENT Learn new concepts and strategies for teaching your students how to think critically and write persuasively. It's not in the curriculum, but it's vital for success in school and in life! 4. STRONG VERSUS WEAK ARGUMENTS 3. CONTRADICTIONS (A AND NOT-A) 3. Contradictions (A and not-A) The concept of a contradiction is very important in logic. In this lecture we’ll look at the standard logical definition of a contradiction. Here’s the standarddefinition.
2. A ONLY IF B
4. INDEPENDENT EVENTS 4. Independent Events. Independence is a very important concept in probability theory.. The basic idea is straightforward. Two events are said to be independent if the occurrence of one doesn’t influence the probability of the occurrence of the other. TYPES OF NORMATIVE CLAIMS: (V) MORAL CLAIMS Principles and Applications. Let’s consider the last example we gave of a normative claim: “The State should not have the right to take the life of one of its citizens as punishment for a crime.” SCRIVENER ESSAY TEMPLATE The zip file above is an archive file, a container for other files. When you download it and double-click on it, it will extract a folder. Inside the folder are two Scrivener files. QUIZ: STRONG VS WEAK ARGUMENTS Learn the fundamental concepts for identifying and evaluating good andbad arguments.
ISSUES WITH TRANSLATING CONDITIONALS: "IF A THEN B" 2. CATEGORIZING FALLACIES: PROS AND CONS 2. Categorizing Fallacies: Pros and Cons. Fallacies are often categorized into different groups or families. We’ve already seen one type of categorization, between THINK FAST! WHY CRITICAL THINKERS NEED TO PAY ATTENTION TO Think Fast! Why Critical Thinkers Need to Pay Attention to Dual-Process Theories of Rationality (3:48) TYPES OF NORMATIVE CLAIMS: (V) MORAL CLAIMS Principles and Applications. Let’s consider the last example we gave of a normative claim: “The State should not have the right to take the life of one of its citizens as punishment for a crime.” THE ART OF REASONING (DAVID KELLEY) The Art of Reasoning: An Introduction to Logic and Critical Thinking (David Kelley) A standard logic-oriented critical thinking text that is commonly used in introductory logic and critical thinking courses taught in philosophy departments. 2. CATEGORIZING FALLACIES: PROS AND CONS 2. Categorizing Fallacies: Pros and Cons. Fallacies are often categorized into different groups or families. We’ve already seen one type of categorization, between DESCRIPTIVE VERSUS NORMATIVE CLAIMS Moral claims are a type of normative claim. For this to be helpful we need to say something about normative claims. Descriptive versusNormative Claims
3. VALID VERSUS INVALID ARGUMENTS 3. Valid vs Invalid Arguments. An argument has to satisfy the Logic Condition in order for it to qualify as a good argument. But there are two importantly different ways in 3. WHAT IS A GOOD ARGUMENT (I)? 3. What is a Good Argument? An argument is an attempt to persuade, but the goal of logic and argumentation isn't simply to persuade — it's to persuade for good reasons. The most basic definition of a good argument is straightforward: it's an argument that gives us good reasons to believe the conclusion.. There's not much we can do with this definition, though. WHAT IS A MORAL ARGUMENT? Definition: A moral argument is an argument with a conclusion that expresses a moral claim. Pretty simple, maybe even trivial. But even simple definitions can contain important information. WHY REWRITING IS IMPORTANT (AND WHY STUDENTS DON'T THINK Transcript. One of the hardest things to get students to do is submit early drafts of essays for review, so they have a chance to rewrite them before the final draft is due. THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NATURAL LANGUAGES AND FORMAL Let’s use PL to stand for “Propositional Logic”. Here are the key points I want to emphasize: 1. Formal languages are very different from natural languages HOME | THE CRITICAL THINKER ACADEMYABOUTALL COURSESCONTACTIS YOUR BRAIN A COMPUTERWHERE TO STARTWHAT IS A GOOD ARGUMENT Kevin's work at the Critical Thinker Academy is the bridge between the rigor of academia and the daily needs of us people out here who want to tame the complexity of the world we live in. We need this." "The way that Kevin delivers the material is digestible, interesting, thought provoking and thorough. 4. STRONG VERSUS WEAK ARGUMENTS2. A ONLY IF B
3. CONTRADICTIONS (A AND NOT-A) A contradiction is a conjunction of the form “A and not-A”, where not-A is the contradictory of A. So, a contradiction is a compound claim, where you’re simultaneously asserting that a proposition is both true and false. Given the logic of the conjunction and the contradictory that we’ve looked at in this course, we can see thatthe
4. INDEPENDENT EVENTS 4. Independent Events. Independence is a very important concept in probability theory. The basic idea is straightforward. Two events are said to be independent if the occurrence of one doesn’t influence the probability of the occurrence of the other. In other words, given two events A and B, if A occurring or not occurring has no effect on 2. CATEGORIZING FALLACIES: PROS AND CONS The Pros. But there are some important up-sides to studying fallacy types. 1. Critical Thinking Literacy. Some fallacy types are very well-known and commonly referred to by their names, like “ straw man ” and “ red herring ” and “ ad hominem ”. It’s important for basic critical thinking literacy to know some of these more common ISSUES WITH TRANSLATING CONDITIONALS: "IF A THEN B" SCRIVENER ESSAY TEMPLATE The zip file above is an archive file, a container for other files. When you download it and double-click on it, it will extract a folder. Inside the folder are two Scrivener files. One is a basic Scrivener document with the essay structure elements as described in the videos. The other is a Scrivener template file which you can import into QUIZ: STRONG VS WEAK ARGUMENTS Learn the fundamental concepts for identifying and evaluating good andbad arguments.
TYPES OF NORMATIVE CLAIMS: (V) MORAL CLAIMS Types of Normative Claims: (V) Moral Claims. Let’s consider the last example we gave of a normative claim: “The State should not have the right to take the life of one of its citizens as punishment for a crime.”. The statement is asserting that capital punishment is not morally justifiable. The “should” here is a MORAL “should”. HOME | THE CRITICAL THINKER ACADEMYABOUTALL COURSESCONTACTIS YOUR BRAIN A COMPUTERWHERE TO STARTWHAT IS A GOOD ARGUMENT Kevin's work at the Critical Thinker Academy is the bridge between the rigor of academia and the daily needs of us people out here who want to tame the complexity of the world we live in. We need this." "The way that Kevin delivers the material is digestible, interesting, thought provoking and thorough. 4. STRONG VERSUS WEAK ARGUMENTS2. A ONLY IF B
3. CONTRADICTIONS (A AND NOT-A) A contradiction is a conjunction of the form “A and not-A”, where not-A is the contradictory of A. So, a contradiction is a compound claim, where you’re simultaneously asserting that a proposition is both true and false. Given the logic of the conjunction and the contradictory that we’ve looked at in this course, we can see thatthe
4. INDEPENDENT EVENTS 4. Independent Events. Independence is a very important concept in probability theory. The basic idea is straightforward. Two events are said to be independent if the occurrence of one doesn’t influence the probability of the occurrence of the other. In other words, given two events A and B, if A occurring or not occurring has no effect on 2. CATEGORIZING FALLACIES: PROS AND CONS The Pros. But there are some important up-sides to studying fallacy types. 1. Critical Thinking Literacy. Some fallacy types are very well-known and commonly referred to by their names, like “ straw man ” and “ red herring ” and “ ad hominem ”. It’s important for basic critical thinking literacy to know some of these more common ISSUES WITH TRANSLATING CONDITIONALS: "IF A THEN B" SCRIVENER ESSAY TEMPLATE The zip file above is an archive file, a container for other files. When you download it and double-click on it, it will extract a folder. Inside the folder are two Scrivener files. One is a basic Scrivener document with the essay structure elements as described in the videos. The other is a Scrivener template file which you can import into QUIZ: STRONG VS WEAK ARGUMENTS Learn the fundamental concepts for identifying and evaluating good andbad arguments.
TYPES OF NORMATIVE CLAIMS: (V) MORAL CLAIMS Types of Normative Claims: (V) Moral Claims. Let’s consider the last example we gave of a normative claim: “The State should not have the right to take the life of one of its citizens as punishment for a crime.”. The statement is asserting that capital punishment is not morally justifiable. The “should” here is a MORAL “should”. THINK FAST! WHY CRITICAL THINKERS NEED TO PAY ATTENTION TO The term that psychologists use today is "dual processing". There are at least two distinct types of cognitive processing. One is fast, automatic, involves feelings and emotional responses in a fundamental way, and is largely outside of conscious control. The other is slow, it requires conscious attention and effort, and it's what we normally 2. CATEGORIZING FALLACIES: PROS AND CONS The Pros. But there are some important up-sides to studying fallacy types. 1. Critical Thinking Literacy. Some fallacy types are very well-known and commonly referred to by their names, like “ straw man ” and “ red herring ” and “ ad hominem ”. It’s important for basic critical thinking literacy to know some of these more common THE ART OF REASONING (DAVID KELLEY) The Art of Reasoning: An Introduction to Logic and Critical Thinking (David Kelley) A standard logic-oriented critical thinking text that is commonly used in introductory logic and critical thinking courses taught in philosophy departments. There's enough here for a two-term course, or you could pick a selection of topics for a one-term course. TYPES OF NORMATIVE CLAIMS: (V) MORAL CLAIMS Types of Normative Claims: (V) Moral Claims. Let’s consider the last example we gave of a normative claim: “The State should not have the right to take the life of one of its citizens as punishment for a crime.”. The statement is asserting that capital punishment is not morally justifiable. The “should” here is a MORAL “should”. 3. VALID VERSUS INVALID ARGUMENTS 1. If Peter Parker is exposed to gamma rays then he'll be able to climb walls like a spider. 2. Peter Parker was exposed to gamma rays. Therefore, Peter Parker can climb walls like a spider. This is a valid argument. But in the fictional Marvel universe, premises 1 and 2 are both false, and the conclusion is true. WHAT IS A MORAL ARGUMENT? Moral arguments, like all arguments, are composed of claims, or propositions, or statements (these are all synonymous for our purposes). One of these claims we call the “conclusion”; the others we call the “premises”. These claims — the premises, and the conclusion — make assertions that can be either true or false(that’s what
3. WHAT IS A GOOD ARGUMENT (I)? 3. What is a Good Argument? An argument is an attempt to persuade, but the goal of logic and argumentation isn't simply to persuade — it's to persuade for good reasons. The most basic definition of a good argument is straightforward: it's an argument that gives us good reasons to believe the conclusion.. There's not much we can do with this definition, though. DESCRIPTIVE VERSUS NORMATIVE CLAIMS Descriptive versus Normative Claims. A “claim” is statement that asserts something that could be either true or false. A DESCRIPTIVE claim is a claim that asserts that such-and-such IS the case . A NORMATIVE claim, on the other hand, is a claim that asserts that such-and-such OUGHT to be the case . Normative claims make valuejudgments.
WHY REWRITING IS IMPORTANT (AND WHY STUDENTS DON'T THINK The fact is that one of the best ways to improve your writing is to write multiple drafts and get feedback on those drafts. In this video I want to talk about why rewriting is important and valuable, and why so many students never both to rewrite. I think it surprises students to learn that for many writers, rewriting is the most enjoyable part THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NATURAL LANGUAGES AND FORMAL 1. Formal languages are very different from natural languages. Natural languages exist in the real world, in flesh-and-blood communities of language users. The grammar of a natural language like English is incredibly complex. We discover the grammar of natural language through empirical investigation. PL is a formal language, anartificial
HOME | THE CRITICAL THINKER ACADEMYABOUTALL COURSESCONTACTIS YOUR BRAIN A COMPUTERWHERE TO STARTWHAT IS A GOOD ARGUMENT Kevin's work at the Critical Thinker Academy is the bridge between the rigor of academia and the daily needs of us people out here who want to tame the complexity of the world we live in. We need this." "The way that Kevin delivers the material is digestible, interesting, thought provoking and thorough.2. A ONLY IF B
3. CONTRADICTIONS (A AND NOT-A) A contradiction is a conjunction of the form “A and not-A”, where not-A is the contradictory of A. So, a contradiction is a compound claim, where you’re simultaneously asserting that a proposition is both true and false. Given the logic of the conjunction and the contradictory that we’ve looked at in this course, we can see thatthe
4. STRONG VERSUS WEAK ARGUMENTS 4. INDEPENDENT EVENTS 4. Independent Events. Independence is a very important concept in probability theory. The basic idea is straightforward. Two events are said to be independent if the occurrence of one doesn’t influence the probability of the occurrence of the other. In other words, given two events A and B, if A occurring or not occurring has no effect on SCRIVENER ESSAY TEMPLATE The zip file above is an archive file, a container for other files. When you download it and double-click on it, it will extract a folder. Inside the folder are two Scrivener files. One is a basic Scrivener document with the essay structure elements as described in the videos. The other is a Scrivener template file which you can import into TYPES OF NORMATIVE CLAIMS: (V) MORAL CLAIMS Types of Normative Claims: (V) Moral Claims. Let’s consider the last example we gave of a normative claim: “The State should not have the right to take the life of one of its citizens as punishment for a crime.”. The statement is asserting that capital punishment is not morally justifiable. The “should” here is a MORAL “should”. QUIZ: STRONG VS WEAK ARGUMENTS Learn the fundamental concepts for identifying and evaluating good andbad arguments.
ISSUES WITH TRANSLATING CONDITIONALS: "IF A THEN B" DESCRIPTIVE VERSUS NORMATIVE CLAIMS Descriptive versus Normative Claims. A “claim” is statement that asserts something that could be either true or false. A DESCRIPTIVE claim is a claim that asserts that such-and-such IS the case . A NORMATIVE claim, on the other hand, is a claim that asserts that such-and-such OUGHT to be the case . Normative claims make valuejudgments.
HOME | THE CRITICAL THINKER ACADEMYABOUTALL COURSESCONTACTIS YOUR BRAIN A COMPUTERWHERE TO STARTWHAT IS A GOOD ARGUMENT Kevin's work at the Critical Thinker Academy is the bridge between the rigor of academia and the daily needs of us people out here who want to tame the complexity of the world we live in. We need this." "The way that Kevin delivers the material is digestible, interesting, thought provoking and thorough.2. A ONLY IF B
3. CONTRADICTIONS (A AND NOT-A) A contradiction is a conjunction of the form “A and not-A”, where not-A is the contradictory of A. So, a contradiction is a compound claim, where you’re simultaneously asserting that a proposition is both true and false. Given the logic of the conjunction and the contradictory that we’ve looked at in this course, we can see thatthe
4. STRONG VERSUS WEAK ARGUMENTS 4. INDEPENDENT EVENTS 4. Independent Events. Independence is a very important concept in probability theory. The basic idea is straightforward. Two events are said to be independent if the occurrence of one doesn’t influence the probability of the occurrence of the other. In other words, given two events A and B, if A occurring or not occurring has no effect on SCRIVENER ESSAY TEMPLATE The zip file above is an archive file, a container for other files. When you download it and double-click on it, it will extract a folder. Inside the folder are two Scrivener files. One is a basic Scrivener document with the essay structure elements as described in the videos. The other is a Scrivener template file which you can import into TYPES OF NORMATIVE CLAIMS: (V) MORAL CLAIMS Types of Normative Claims: (V) Moral Claims. Let’s consider the last example we gave of a normative claim: “The State should not have the right to take the life of one of its citizens as punishment for a crime.”. The statement is asserting that capital punishment is not morally justifiable. The “should” here is a MORAL “should”. QUIZ: STRONG VS WEAK ARGUMENTS Learn the fundamental concepts for identifying and evaluating good andbad arguments.
ISSUES WITH TRANSLATING CONDITIONALS: "IF A THEN B" DESCRIPTIVE VERSUS NORMATIVE CLAIMS Descriptive versus Normative Claims. A “claim” is statement that asserts something that could be either true or false. A DESCRIPTIVE claim is a claim that asserts that such-and-such IS the case . A NORMATIVE claim, on the other hand, is a claim that asserts that such-and-such OUGHT to be the case . Normative claims make valuejudgments.
THINK FAST! WHY CRITICAL THINKERS NEED TO PAY ATTENTION TO The term that psychologists use today is "dual processing". There are at least two distinct types of cognitive processing. One is fast, automatic, involves feelings and emotional responses in a fundamental way, and is largely outside of conscious control. The other is slow, it requires conscious attention and effort, and it's what we normally 4. IDENTIFYING PREMISES AND CONCLUSIONS 4. Identifying Premises and Conclusions. Argument analysis would be a lot easier if people gave their arguments in standard form, with the premises and conclusions flagged in an obvious way. But people don’t usually talk this way, or write this way. Sometimes the conclusion of an argument is obvious, but sometimes it’s not. 2. CATEGORIZING FALLACIES: PROS AND CONS The Pros. But there are some important up-sides to studying fallacy types. 1. Critical Thinking Literacy. Some fallacy types are very well-known and commonly referred to by their names, like “ straw man ” and “ red herring ” and “ ad hominem ”. It’s important for basic critical thinking literacy to know some of these more common HOW TO BUILD A COMPELLING MORAL ARGUMENT In this course you’ll learn how to build moral arguments that are persuasive and compelling, and how to develop a richer and more systematic understanding of your own moral beliefs and values. This is a text-based course. Lectures are updated on a weekly basis. Note: This course is only available to Patreon supporters at the $3/monthlevel or
DESCRIPTIVE VERSUS NORMATIVE CLAIMS Descriptive versus Normative Claims. A “claim” is statement that asserts something that could be either true or false. A DESCRIPTIVE claim is a claim that asserts that such-and-such IS the case . A NORMATIVE claim, on the other hand, is a claim that asserts that such-and-such OUGHT to be the case . Normative claims make valuejudgments.
3. WHAT IS A GOOD ARGUMENT (I)? 3. What is a Good Argument? An argument is an attempt to persuade, but the goal of logic and argumentation isn't simply to persuade — it's to persuade for good reasons. The most basic definition of a good argument is straightforward: it's an argument that gives us good reasons to believe the conclusion.. There's not much we can do with this definition, though. 3. VALID VERSUS INVALID ARGUMENTS 1. If Peter Parker is exposed to gamma rays then he'll be able to climb walls like a spider. 2. Peter Parker was exposed to gamma rays. Therefore, Peter Parker can climb walls like a spider. This is a valid argument. But in the fictional Marvel universe, premises 1 and 2 are both false, and the conclusion is true. WHY REWRITING IS IMPORTANT (AND WHY STUDENTS DON'T THINK The fact is that one of the best ways to improve your writing is to write multiple drafts and get feedback on those drafts. In this video I want to talk about why rewriting is important and valuable, and why so many students never both to rewrite. I think it surprises students to learn that for many writers, rewriting is the most enjoyable part CLASSIC STYLE: PROSE AS A WINDOW INTO THE WORLD Classic style views prose as a window to the world. The model scene is one where the writer and the reader are in conversation. The writer’s goal is to depict a world that presents a truth, and to position the reader in such a way that the reader can see what the writer sees, and thereby confirm the truth that the writer ispresenting.
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NATURAL LANGUAGES AND FORMAL 1. Formal languages are very different from natural languages. Natural languages exist in the real world, in flesh-and-blood communities of language users. The grammar of a natural language like English is incredibly complex. We discover the grammar of natural language through empirical investigation. PL is a formal language, anartificial
HOME | THE CRITICAL THINKER ACADEMYABOUTALL COURSESCONTACTIS YOUR BRAIN A COMPUTERWHERE TO STARTWHAT IS A GOOD ARGUMENT Kevin's work at the Critical Thinker Academy is the bridge between the rigor of academia and the daily needs of us people out here who want to tame the complexity of the world we live in. We need this." "The way that Kevin delivers the material is digestible, interesting, thought provoking and thorough.2. A ONLY IF B
WHAT IS A GOOD ARGUMENT? In this course you'll learn: what an argument is and what is required to have an argument. the distinction between good arguments and bad arguments. the distinction between evaluating the logic of an argument and evaluating the truth or falsity of the premises. the distinction between true premises and plausible premises.2. WHAT IS A CLAIM?
A claim, or a statement, or a proposition, is a bit of language whose defining characteristic is that it makes an assertion that could be true or false but not both. The "true or false" part of this definition expresses a principle of classical logic that's called the Principle of Bivalence. This principle asserts that a claim can onlyassume
3. CONTRADICTIONS (A AND NOT-A) A contradiction is a conjunction of the form “A and not-A”, where not-A is the contradictory of A. So, a contradiction is a compound claim, where you’re simultaneously asserting that a proposition is both true and false. Given the logic of the conjunction and the contradictory that we’ve looked at in this course, we can see thatthe
TYPES OF NORMATIVE CLAIMS: (V) MORAL CLAIMS Types of Normative Claims: (V) Moral Claims. Let’s consider the last example we gave of a normative claim: “The State should not have the right to take the life of one of its citizens as punishment for a crime.”. The statement is asserting that capital punishment is not morally justifiable. The “should” here is a MORAL “should”. ISSUES WITH TRANSLATING CONDITIONALS: "IF A THEN B" SCRIVENER ESSAY TEMPLATE The zip file above is an archive file, a container for other files. When you download it and double-click on it, it will extract a folder. Inside the folder are two Scrivener files. One is a basic Scrivener document with the essay structure elements as described in the videos. The other is a Scrivener template file which you can import into QUIZ: STRONG VS WEAK ARGUMENTS Learn the fundamental concepts for identifying and evaluating good andbad arguments.
WHY REWRITING IS IMPORTANT (AND WHY STUDENTS DON'T THINK The fact is that one of the best ways to improve your writing is to write multiple drafts and get feedback on those drafts. In this video I want to talk about why rewriting is important and valuable, and why so many students never both to rewrite. I think it surprises students to learn that for many writers, rewriting is the most enjoyable part HOME | THE CRITICAL THINKER ACADEMYABOUTALL COURSESCONTACTIS YOUR BRAIN A COMPUTERWHERE TO STARTWHAT IS A GOOD ARGUMENT Kevin's work at the Critical Thinker Academy is the bridge between the rigor of academia and the daily needs of us people out here who want to tame the complexity of the world we live in. We need this." "The way that Kevin delivers the material is digestible, interesting, thought provoking and thorough.2. A ONLY IF B
WHAT IS A GOOD ARGUMENT? In this course you'll learn: what an argument is and what is required to have an argument. the distinction between good arguments and bad arguments. the distinction between evaluating the logic of an argument and evaluating the truth or falsity of the premises. the distinction between true premises and plausible premises.2. WHAT IS A CLAIM?
A claim, or a statement, or a proposition, is a bit of language whose defining characteristic is that it makes an assertion that could be true or false but not both. The "true or false" part of this definition expresses a principle of classical logic that's called the Principle of Bivalence. This principle asserts that a claim can onlyassume
3. CONTRADICTIONS (A AND NOT-A) A contradiction is a conjunction of the form “A and not-A”, where not-A is the contradictory of A. So, a contradiction is a compound claim, where you’re simultaneously asserting that a proposition is both true and false. Given the logic of the conjunction and the contradictory that we’ve looked at in this course, we can see thatthe
TYPES OF NORMATIVE CLAIMS: (V) MORAL CLAIMS Types of Normative Claims: (V) Moral Claims. Let’s consider the last example we gave of a normative claim: “The State should not have the right to take the life of one of its citizens as punishment for a crime.”. The statement is asserting that capital punishment is not morally justifiable. The “should” here is a MORAL “should”. ISSUES WITH TRANSLATING CONDITIONALS: "IF A THEN B" SCRIVENER ESSAY TEMPLATE The zip file above is an archive file, a container for other files. When you download it and double-click on it, it will extract a folder. Inside the folder are two Scrivener files. One is a basic Scrivener document with the essay structure elements as described in the videos. The other is a Scrivener template file which you can import into QUIZ: STRONG VS WEAK ARGUMENTS Learn the fundamental concepts for identifying and evaluating good andbad arguments.
WHY REWRITING IS IMPORTANT (AND WHY STUDENTS DON'T THINK The fact is that one of the best ways to improve your writing is to write multiple drafts and get feedback on those drafts. In this video I want to talk about why rewriting is important and valuable, and why so many students never both to rewrite. I think it surprises students to learn that for many writers, rewriting is the most enjoyable part THE CRITICAL THINKER ACADEMY The Critical Thinker Academy. Unlock Every Course! Available until. Access Every Course for a One-Time Fee 25% Savings. 17 Course Bundle. %. COMPLETE. $99. 4. STRONG VERSUS WEAK ARGUMENTS The distinction between strong and weak arguments, on the other hand, is a matter of degree. It does make sense to say that an argument is very strong, or moderately strong, or moderately weak or very weak. But the threshold between weak and strong arguments isn't fixed or specified by logic. It is, in fact, a conventional choice that wemake.
CREATIVITY FOR CRITICAL THINKERS (ANTHONY WESTON) Creativity for Critical Thinkers (Anthony Weston) This is a unique little book, written by a philosopher, is one of the few I have found that explicitly addresses the relationship between creativity and critical thinking, and offers exercises for developing creativethinking skills.
THE ART OF REASONING (DAVID KELLEY) The Art of Reasoning: An Introduction to Logic and Critical Thinking (David Kelley) A standard logic-oriented critical thinking text that is commonly used in introductory logic and critical thinking courses taught in philosophy departments. There's enough here for a two-term course, or you could pick a selection of topics for a one-term course. 3. WHAT IS A GOOD ARGUMENT (I)? 3. What is a Good Argument? An argument is an attempt to persuade, but the goal of logic and argumentation isn't simply to persuade — it's to persuade for good reasons. The most basic definition of a good argument is straightforward: it's an argument that gives us good reasons to believe the conclusion.. There's not much we can do with this definition, though. 4. IDENTIFYING PREMISES AND CONCLUSIONS 4. Identifying Premises and Conclusions. Argument analysis would be a lot easier if people gave their arguments in standard form, with the premises and conclusions flagged in an obvious way. But people don’t usually talk this way, or write this way. Sometimes the conclusion of an argument is obvious, but sometimes it’s not. PRACTICAL STYLE, REFLEXIVE STYLE AND ACADEMIC STYLE Transcript. In this video I’m going to introduce two new forms of writing style, which have been called “practical style” and “reflexive style”. WHY REWRITING IS IMPORTANT (AND WHY STUDENTS DON'T THINK The fact is that one of the best ways to improve your writing is to write multiple drafts and get feedback on those drafts. In this video I want to talk about why rewriting is important and valuable, and why so many students never both to rewrite. I think it surprises students to learn that for many writers, rewriting is the most enjoyable part DO I NEED TO CITE SOURCES IN ORAL DEBATES? Debaters may want to cite sources explicitly to help support their case, and if they don't they still need to be able to back up their claims if challenged in cross-examination, or (often with political debates) after the fact, since the audience and the media will fact-check their statements. CLASSIC STYLE: PROSE AS A WINDOW INTO THE WORLD Classic style views prose as a window to the world. The model scene is one where the writer and the reader are in conversation. The writer’s goal is to depict a world that presents a truth, and to position the reader in such a way that the reader can see what the writer sees, and thereby confirm the truth that the writer ispresenting.
HOME | THE CRITICAL THINKER ACADEMYABOUTALL COURSESCONTACTIS YOUR BRAIN A COMPUTERWHERE TO STARTWHAT IS A GOOD ARGUMENT Kevin's work at the Critical Thinker Academy is the bridge between the rigor of academia and the daily needs of us people out here who want to tame the complexity of the world we live in. We need this." "The way that Kevin delivers the material is digestible, interesting, thought provoking and thorough.2. A ONLY IF B
WHAT IS A GOOD ARGUMENT? In this course you'll learn: what an argument is and what is required to have an argument. the distinction between good arguments and bad arguments. the distinction between evaluating the logic of an argument and evaluating the truth or falsity of the premises. the distinction between true premises and plausible premises.2. WHAT IS A CLAIM?
A claim, or a statement, or a proposition, is a bit of language whose defining characteristic is that it makes an assertion that could be true or false but not both. The "true or false" part of this definition expresses a principle of classical logic that's called the Principle of Bivalence. This principle asserts that a claim can onlyassume
3. CONTRADICTIONS (A AND NOT-A) A contradiction is a conjunction of the form “A and not-A”, where not-A is the contradictory of A. So, a contradiction is a compound claim, where you’re simultaneously asserting that a proposition is both true and false. Given the logic of the conjunction and the contradictory that we’ve looked at in this course, we can see thatthe
TYPES OF NORMATIVE CLAIMS: (V) MORAL CLAIMS Types of Normative Claims: (V) Moral Claims. Let’s consider the last example we gave of a normative claim: “The State should not have the right to take the life of one of its citizens as punishment for a crime.”. The statement is asserting that capital punishment is not morally justifiable. The “should” here is a MORAL “should”. ISSUES WITH TRANSLATING CONDITIONALS: "IF A THEN B" SCRIVENER ESSAY TEMPLATE The zip file above is an archive file, a container for other files. When you download it and double-click on it, it will extract a folder. Inside the folder are two Scrivener files. One is a basic Scrivener document with the essay structure elements as described in the videos. The other is a Scrivener template file which you can import into QUIZ: STRONG VS WEAK ARGUMENTS Learn the fundamental concepts for identifying and evaluating good andbad arguments.
WHY REWRITING IS IMPORTANT (AND WHY STUDENTS DON'T THINK The fact is that one of the best ways to improve your writing is to write multiple drafts and get feedback on those drafts. In this video I want to talk about why rewriting is important and valuable, and why so many students never both to rewrite. I think it surprises students to learn that for many writers, rewriting is the most enjoyable part HOME | THE CRITICAL THINKER ACADEMYABOUTALL COURSESCONTACTIS YOUR BRAIN A COMPUTERWHERE TO STARTWHAT IS A GOOD ARGUMENT Kevin's work at the Critical Thinker Academy is the bridge between the rigor of academia and the daily needs of us people out here who want to tame the complexity of the world we live in. We need this." "The way that Kevin delivers the material is digestible, interesting, thought provoking and thorough.2. A ONLY IF B
WHAT IS A GOOD ARGUMENT? In this course you'll learn: what an argument is and what is required to have an argument. the distinction between good arguments and bad arguments. the distinction between evaluating the logic of an argument and evaluating the truth or falsity of the premises. the distinction between true premises and plausible premises.2. WHAT IS A CLAIM?
A claim, or a statement, or a proposition, is a bit of language whose defining characteristic is that it makes an assertion that could be true or false but not both. The "true or false" part of this definition expresses a principle of classical logic that's called the Principle of Bivalence. This principle asserts that a claim can onlyassume
3. CONTRADICTIONS (A AND NOT-A) A contradiction is a conjunction of the form “A and not-A”, where not-A is the contradictory of A. So, a contradiction is a compound claim, where you’re simultaneously asserting that a proposition is both true and false. Given the logic of the conjunction and the contradictory that we’ve looked at in this course, we can see thatthe
TYPES OF NORMATIVE CLAIMS: (V) MORAL CLAIMS Types of Normative Claims: (V) Moral Claims. Let’s consider the last example we gave of a normative claim: “The State should not have the right to take the life of one of its citizens as punishment for a crime.”. The statement is asserting that capital punishment is not morally justifiable. The “should” here is a MORAL “should”. ISSUES WITH TRANSLATING CONDITIONALS: "IF A THEN B" SCRIVENER ESSAY TEMPLATE The zip file above is an archive file, a container for other files. When you download it and double-click on it, it will extract a folder. Inside the folder are two Scrivener files. One is a basic Scrivener document with the essay structure elements as described in the videos. The other is a Scrivener template file which you can import into QUIZ: STRONG VS WEAK ARGUMENTS Learn the fundamental concepts for identifying and evaluating good andbad arguments.
WHY REWRITING IS IMPORTANT (AND WHY STUDENTS DON'T THINK The fact is that one of the best ways to improve your writing is to write multiple drafts and get feedback on those drafts. In this video I want to talk about why rewriting is important and valuable, and why so many students never both to rewrite. I think it surprises students to learn that for many writers, rewriting is the most enjoyable part THE CRITICAL THINKER ACADEMY The Critical Thinker Academy. Unlock Every Course! Available until. Access Every Course for a One-Time Fee 25% Savings. 17 Course Bundle. %. COMPLETE. $99. 4. STRONG VERSUS WEAK ARGUMENTS The distinction between strong and weak arguments, on the other hand, is a matter of degree. It does make sense to say that an argument is very strong, or moderately strong, or moderately weak or very weak. But the threshold between weak and strong arguments isn't fixed or specified by logic. It is, in fact, a conventional choice that wemake.
CREATIVITY FOR CRITICAL THINKERS (ANTHONY WESTON) Creativity for Critical Thinkers (Anthony Weston) This is a unique little book, written by a philosopher, is one of the few I have found that explicitly addresses the relationship between creativity and critical thinking, and offers exercises for developing creativethinking skills.
THE ART OF REASONING (DAVID KELLEY) The Art of Reasoning: An Introduction to Logic and Critical Thinking (David Kelley) A standard logic-oriented critical thinking text that is commonly used in introductory logic and critical thinking courses taught in philosophy departments. There's enough here for a two-term course, or you could pick a selection of topics for a one-term course. 3. WHAT IS A GOOD ARGUMENT (I)? 3. What is a Good Argument? An argument is an attempt to persuade, but the goal of logic and argumentation isn't simply to persuade — it's to persuade for good reasons. The most basic definition of a good argument is straightforward: it's an argument that gives us good reasons to believe the conclusion.. There's not much we can do with this definition, though. 4. IDENTIFYING PREMISES AND CONCLUSIONS 4. Identifying Premises and Conclusions. Argument analysis would be a lot easier if people gave their arguments in standard form, with the premises and conclusions flagged in an obvious way. But people don’t usually talk this way, or write this way. Sometimes the conclusion of an argument is obvious, but sometimes it’s not. PRACTICAL STYLE, REFLEXIVE STYLE AND ACADEMIC STYLE Transcript. In this video I’m going to introduce two new forms of writing style, which have been called “practical style” and “reflexive style”. WHY REWRITING IS IMPORTANT (AND WHY STUDENTS DON'T THINK The fact is that one of the best ways to improve your writing is to write multiple drafts and get feedback on those drafts. In this video I want to talk about why rewriting is important and valuable, and why so many students never both to rewrite. I think it surprises students to learn that for many writers, rewriting is the most enjoyable part DO I NEED TO CITE SOURCES IN ORAL DEBATES? Debaters may want to cite sources explicitly to help support their case, and if they don't they still need to be able to back up their claims if challenged in cross-examination, or (often with political debates) after the fact, since the audience and the media will fact-check their statements. CLASSIC STYLE: PROSE AS A WINDOW INTO THE WORLD Classic style views prose as a window to the world. The model scene is one where the writer and the reader are in conversation. The writer’s goal is to depict a world that presents a truth, and to position the reader in such a way that the reader can see what the writer sees, and thereby confirm the truth that the writer ispresenting.
HOME | THE CRITICAL THINKER ACADEMYABOUTALL COURSESCONTACTIS YOUR BRAIN A COMPUTERWHERE TO STARTWHAT IS A GOOD ARGUMENT Kevin's work at the Critical Thinker Academy is the bridge between the rigor of academia and the daily needs of us people out here who want to tame the complexity of the world we live in. We need this." "The way that Kevin delivers the material is digestible, interesting, thought provoking and thorough. WHAT IS A GOOD ARGUMENT? In this course you'll learn: what an argument is and what is required to have an argument. the distinction between good arguments and bad arguments. the distinction between evaluating the logic of an argument and evaluating the truth or falsity of the premises. the distinction between true premises and plausible premises.2. A ONLY IF B
2. WHAT IS A CLAIM?
A claim, or a statement, or a proposition, is a bit of language whose defining characteristic is that it makes an assertion that could be true or false but not both. The "true or false" part of this definition expresses a principle of classical logic that's called the Principle of Bivalence. This principle asserts that a claim can onlyassume
TYPES OF NORMATIVE CLAIMS: (V) MORAL CLAIMS Types of Normative Claims: (V) Moral Claims. Let’s consider the last example we gave of a normative claim: “The State should not have the right to take the life of one of its citizens as punishment for a crime.”. The statement is asserting that capital punishment is not morally justifiable. The “should” here is a MORAL “should”. SCRIVENER ESSAY TEMPLATE The zip file above is an archive file, a container for other files. When you download it and double-click on it, it will extract a folder. Inside the folder are two Scrivener files. One is a basic Scrivener document with the essay structure elements as described in the videos. The other is a Scrivener template file which you can import into QUIZ: STRONG VS WEAK ARGUMENTS Learn the fundamental concepts for identifying and evaluating good andbad arguments.
ISSUES WITH TRANSLATING CONDITIONALS: "IF A THEN B" A STRUCTURED APPROACH TO ESSAY WRITING USING SCRIVENER In this video I’m going to walk you through a Scrivener template that can help you manage both the structure of an essay project and provide some guidance for how to organize your time so you can actually complete the project before whatever deadline you may have. If this is your first exposure to Scrivener you might to check out theprevious
WHY REWRITING IS IMPORTANT (AND WHY STUDENTS DON'T THINK The fact is that one of the best ways to improve your writing is to write multiple drafts and get feedback on those drafts. In this video I want to talk about why rewriting is important and valuable, and why so many students never both to rewrite. I think it surprises students to learn that for many writers, rewriting is the most enjoyable part HOME | THE CRITICAL THINKER ACADEMYABOUTALL COURSESCONTACTIS YOUR BRAIN A COMPUTERWHERE TO STARTWHAT IS A GOOD ARGUMENT Kevin's work at the Critical Thinker Academy is the bridge between the rigor of academia and the daily needs of us people out here who want to tame the complexity of the world we live in. We need this." "The way that Kevin delivers the material is digestible, interesting, thought provoking and thorough. WHAT IS A GOOD ARGUMENT? In this course you'll learn: what an argument is and what is required to have an argument. the distinction between good arguments and bad arguments. the distinction between evaluating the logic of an argument and evaluating the truth or falsity of the premises. the distinction between true premises and plausible premises.2. A ONLY IF B
2. WHAT IS A CLAIM?
A claim, or a statement, or a proposition, is a bit of language whose defining characteristic is that it makes an assertion that could be true or false but not both. The "true or false" part of this definition expresses a principle of classical logic that's called the Principle of Bivalence. This principle asserts that a claim can onlyassume
TYPES OF NORMATIVE CLAIMS: (V) MORAL CLAIMS Types of Normative Claims: (V) Moral Claims. Let’s consider the last example we gave of a normative claim: “The State should not have the right to take the life of one of its citizens as punishment for a crime.”. The statement is asserting that capital punishment is not morally justifiable. The “should” here is a MORAL “should”. SCRIVENER ESSAY TEMPLATE The zip file above is an archive file, a container for other files. When you download it and double-click on it, it will extract a folder. Inside the folder are two Scrivener files. One is a basic Scrivener document with the essay structure elements as described in the videos. The other is a Scrivener template file which you can import into QUIZ: STRONG VS WEAK ARGUMENTS Learn the fundamental concepts for identifying and evaluating good andbad arguments.
ISSUES WITH TRANSLATING CONDITIONALS: "IF A THEN B" A STRUCTURED APPROACH TO ESSAY WRITING USING SCRIVENER In this video I’m going to walk you through a Scrivener template that can help you manage both the structure of an essay project and provide some guidance for how to organize your time so you can actually complete the project before whatever deadline you may have. If this is your first exposure to Scrivener you might to check out theprevious
WHY REWRITING IS IMPORTANT (AND WHY STUDENTS DON'T THINK The fact is that one of the best ways to improve your writing is to write multiple drafts and get feedback on those drafts. In this video I want to talk about why rewriting is important and valuable, and why so many students never both to rewrite. I think it surprises students to learn that for many writers, rewriting is the most enjoyable part THE CRITICAL THINKER ACADEMY The Critical Thinker Academy. Unlock Every Course! Available until. Access Every Course for a One-Time Fee 25% Savings. 17 Course Bundle. %. COMPLETE. $99. CREATIVITY FOR CRITICAL THINKERS (ANTHONY WESTON) Creativity for Critical Thinkers (Anthony Weston) This is a unique little book, written by a philosopher, is one of the few I have found that explicitly addresses the relationship between creativity and critical thinking, and offers exercises for developing creativethinking skills.
THE ART OF REASONING (DAVID KELLEY) The Art of Reasoning: An Introduction to Logic and Critical Thinking (David Kelley) A standard logic-oriented critical thinking text that is commonly used in introductory logic and critical thinking courses taught in philosophy departments. There's enough here for a two-term course, or you could pick a selection of topics for a one-term course. PRACTICAL STYLE, REFLEXIVE STYLE AND ACADEMIC STYLE Transcript. In this video I’m going to introduce two new forms of writing style, which have been called “practical style” and “reflexive style”. 4. STRONG VERSUS WEAK ARGUMENTS The distinction between strong and weak arguments, on the other hand, is a matter of degree. It does make sense to say that an argument is very strong, or moderately strong, or moderately weak or very weak. But the threshold between weak and strong arguments isn't fixed or specified by logic. It is, in fact, a conventional choice that wemake.
4. IDENTIFYING PREMISES AND CONCLUSIONS 4. Identifying Premises and Conclusions. Argument analysis would be a lot easier if people gave their arguments in standard form, with the premises and conclusions flagged in an obvious way. But people don’t usually talk this way, or write this way. Sometimes the conclusion of an argument is obvious, but sometimes it’s not. 3. WHAT IS A GOOD ARGUMENT (I)? 3. What is a Good Argument? An argument is an attempt to persuade, but the goal of logic and argumentation isn't simply to persuade — it's to persuade for good reasons. The most basic definition of a good argument is straightforward: it's an argument that gives us good reasons to believe the conclusion.. There's not much we can do with this definition, though. WHY REWRITING IS IMPORTANT (AND WHY STUDENTS DON'T THINK The fact is that one of the best ways to improve your writing is to write multiple drafts and get feedback on those drafts. In this video I want to talk about why rewriting is important and valuable, and why so many students never both to rewrite. I think it surprises students to learn that for many writers, rewriting is the most enjoyable part CLASSIC STYLE: PROSE AS A WINDOW INTO THE WORLD Classic style views prose as a window to the world. The model scene is one where the writer and the reader are in conversation. The writer’s goal is to depict a world that presents a truth, and to position the reader in such a way that the reader can see what the writer sees, and thereby confirm the truth that the writer ispresenting.
DESCRIPTIVE VERSUS NORMATIVE CLAIMS Descriptive versus Normative Claims. A “claim” is statement that asserts something that could be either true or false. A DESCRIPTIVE claim is a claim that asserts that such-and-such IS the case . A NORMATIVE claim, on the other hand, is a claim that asserts that such-and-such OUGHT to be the case . Normative claims make valuejudgments.
Toggle navigation
* Home
* About
* All Courses
* Argument Ninja Dojo* Contact
* Login
* Sign Up
CRITICAL THINKER ACADEMY LEARN HOW TO THINK, NOT WHAT TO THINK __ Watch Promo Enroll nowSTUDENTS
Master the essential thinking and essay writing skills that you should know before leaving high school (but which you will never be taught inhigh school)!
TEACHERS
Learn new concepts and strategies for teaching your students how to think critically and write persuasively. It's not in the curriculum, but it's vital for success in school and in life!LIFELONG LEARNERS
Discover what 2500 years of research in philosophy and science have taught us about the art and science of reasoning well!"I tell everyone that critical thinking skills have been around for 2500 years, but for some reason it's never made it all the way down into the general population. Kevin's work at the Critical Thinker Academy is the bridge between the rigor of academia and the daily needs of us people out here who want to tame the complexity of the world we live in. We need this."
- MARK HALVORSON
__
FEATURED COURSES (THERE'S MORE!) Unlock Every Course! Access Every Course for a One-Time Fee25% Savings
17 Course Bundle
%
COMPLETE
$99
The Vocabulary of Science: First Steps to Science Literacy Learn to think more critically about science by mastering the language we use to talk about scienceKevin deLaplante
%
COMPLETE
FREE
Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It's Important Learn why critical thinking skills are important and why they can be so difficult to obtain.Kevin deLaplante
%
COMPLETE
$9
Upgrade Your Mindware A First Course on Cognitive Biases, Debiasing Strategies and CriticalThinking
Kevin deLaplante
%
COMPLETE
$9
Is Your Brain a Computer? Critical Thinking About Minds, Brains and Artificial IntelligenceKevin deLaplante
%
COMPLETE
$9
What is a Good Argument? Learn the fundamental concepts for identifying and evaluating goodand bad arguments.
Kevin deLaplante
%
COMPLETE
$9 View All Courses
"The way that Kevin delivers the material is digestible, interesting, thought provoking and thorough. He manages to fit so much thoughtful material into a mere 6 minutes, in such an effortless and comprehensive way. The curriculum is great for a beginner like me, because he breaks it down into manageable bite size pieces, in a way that honours the natural intelligence of a person."- SHARON ALLEN
__
ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS BEFORE SIGNING UP? EMAIL ME.×
2018 The Critical Thinker Academy 2019* Terms of Use
* Privacy Policy
* Contact
Details
Copyright © 2024 ArchiveBay.com. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | DMCA | 2021 | Feedback | Advertising | RSS 2.0