Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
More Annotations
A complete backup of https://camposlanuza.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://pedsovet.org
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://fxforever.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://recruiter.co.kr
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://posnet.com.pl
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://memim.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://faribaultmill.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://jobhub.jp
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://semiconductor-digest.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://stihl.com.au
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://galwaycity.ie
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Favourite Annotations
A complete backup of https://kinloch-lodge.co.uk
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://allsugardaddy.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://noclegi.pl
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://iasc-commons.org
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://techexpousa.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://redlock.io
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://ecolo.be
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://meldonium.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://craftiments.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://touropia.com
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://pluta.net
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
A complete backup of https://i-portunus.eu
Are you over 18 and want to see adult content?
Text
categories of
THE CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC CREATION: HOME OF THE HYDROPLATE The Center for Scientific Creation: Home of the Hydroplate Theory. About This Site. The 8th Edition of In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood by Dr. Walt Brown is available to order here. It can also be read or printed out at this website; just use the links at the left to navigate through the outline of theentire book.
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Figure 3: “Unlevel” Sea Level. An amazing technological development reveals details on ocean floors. 4 In 1983, a radar altimeter on the U.S. Navy’s SEASAT satellite measured the satellite’s distance above the ocean surface with an accuracy of several inches! “Sea level” is far from level. Instead, the ocean surface “humps up” over mountains on the ocean floor and isdepressed
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE No. This is a common misunderstanding. Violent geshem 3 rain lasted for 40 days and 40 nights, but the floodwaters continued to rise and eventually covered all preflood mountains 150 days after the flood began. People and animals were in the Ark for more than a year—7 months after the Ark landed, because conditions outside the Ark were hostile. [To see why, read "Why Did the Floodwater Drain IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Today’s primary energy sources, fossil fuels, and nuclear reactors did not exist before the flood but are recognized today as global pollutants. 2. The rock layer—the Earth’s crust—would have had some stiffness, because it was 30–60-miles thick. However, the crust’s large area would have given it IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE The Origin of the Grand Canyon SUMMARY: Geologists now admit that they do not know how the Grand Canyon formed, but for the last 140 years, they have insisted that the Colorado River carved the canyon over millions of years and somehow removed the evidence. 2 (Figure 43 on page 110 describes two obvious problems with that idea.) However, some so-called experts admit that the canyon’s birth IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Is There a Large Gap of Time between Genesis 1:1and 1:2?
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Details Relating to McKee’sProposal
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Expanse or Firmament (raqia). The key Hebrew word in Genesis 1: 6–8a is raqia ( (ayqirf ). It is translated “firmament” in the King James Version and “expanse” in most Hebrew dictionaries and modern translations. While its original meaning is uncertain, its root, raqa ( (qarf ), means to spread out, beat out, or hammer as one would a IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE The word “race,” when referring to physical characteristics, hardly ever occurs in the Bible. 1 Instead, the word “nation” is used more than 200 times. The term “race” may be used to describe ethnic groups, but is not a scientific concept. Genetic and molecular variations among the so-called “races” are trivial, although a CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC CREATION In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood takes a different look at a currently hot topic. Evidence that could revolutionize our understanding of origins is carefully explained. You will be challenged to consider fresh ideas in this age-old debate. Part I of In the Beginning discusses, in quick overview, 131categories of
THE CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC CREATION: HOME OF THE HYDROPLATE The Center for Scientific Creation: Home of the Hydroplate Theory. About This Site. The 8th Edition of In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood by Dr. Walt Brown is available to order here. It can also be read or printed out at this website; just use the links at the left to navigate through the outline of theentire book.
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Figure 3: “Unlevel” Sea Level. An amazing technological development reveals details on ocean floors. 4 In 1983, a radar altimeter on the U.S. Navy’s SEASAT satellite measured the satellite’s distance above the ocean surface with an accuracy of several inches! “Sea level” is far from level. Instead, the ocean surface “humps up” over mountains on the ocean floor and isdepressed
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE No. This is a common misunderstanding. Violent geshem 3 rain lasted for 40 days and 40 nights, but the floodwaters continued to rise and eventually covered all preflood mountains 150 days after the flood began. People and animals were in the Ark for more than a year—7 months after the Ark landed, because conditions outside the Ark were hostile. [To see why, read "Why Did the Floodwater Drain IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Today’s primary energy sources, fossil fuels, and nuclear reactors did not exist before the flood but are recognized today as global pollutants. 2. The rock layer—the Earth’s crust—would have had some stiffness, because it was 30–60-miles thick. However, the crust’s large area would have given it IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE The Origin of the Grand Canyon SUMMARY: Geologists now admit that they do not know how the Grand Canyon formed, but for the last 140 years, they have insisted that the Colorado River carved the canyon over millions of years and somehow removed the evidence. 2 (Figure 43 on page 110 describes two obvious problems with that idea.) However, some so-called experts admit that the canyon’s birth IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Is There a Large Gap of Time between Genesis 1:1and 1:2?
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Details Relating to McKee’sProposal
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Expanse or Firmament (raqia). The key Hebrew word in Genesis 1: 6–8a is raqia ( (ayqirf ). It is translated “firmament” in the King James Version and “expanse” in most Hebrew dictionaries and modern translations. While its original meaning is uncertain, its root, raqa ( (qarf ), means to spread out, beat out, or hammer as one would a IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE The word “race,” when referring to physical characteristics, hardly ever occurs in the Bible. 1 Instead, the word “nation” is used more than 200 times. The term “race” may be used to describe ethnic groups, but is not a scientific concept. Genetic and molecular variations among the so-called “races” are trivial, although a IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Life Sciences Shown in the circular inset near the bottom of Figure 1 is the double helix representing DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid). Duplicate copies of this long tape of coded information are coiled up in almost all of the 30,000,000,000,000 (thirty trillion) cells inyour body.
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE As explained in “The Origin of Earth’s Radioactivity” (pages 391 – 429), during the flood, powerful electrical (piezoelectric) currents inside the fluttering crust released a gigantic flux of neutrons that produced a few thousand new isotopes —unusually light (or heavy) chemical elements, because they had fewer (or more) neutrons than normal. IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Today’s primary energy sources, fossil fuels, and nuclear reactors did not exist before the flood but are recognized today as global pollutants. 2. The rock layer—the Earth’s crust—would have had some stiffness, because it was 30–60-miles thick. However, the crust’s large area would have given it IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Even fast comets, because of their great distance from Earth, appear to “hang” in the night sky, almost as stationary as the stars. Comets reflect sunlight and fluoresce (glow). They are brightest near the Sun and sometimes visible in daylight. A typical comet, when far from the Sun, resembles a dirty, misshapen snowball, a few milesacross.
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE The pillars were also compressed and stretched twice a day by a second form of tidal pumping. The Moon’s gravity lifted some of the weight of the crust off the pillars at 12 o’clock and partially lifted the inner Earth off the compressed pillar at 6 o’clock. This, in IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE In at least eight places on the Atlantic and Pacific floors, segments of the Mid-Oceanic Ridge overlap for about 10 miles. They are called overlapping spreading centers. 7 If plates are moving away from the Mid-Oceanic Ridge, then the distance between overlapping segments must be increasing. IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Expanse or Firmament (raqia). The key Hebrew word in Genesis 1: 6–8a is raqia ( (ayqirf ). It is translated “firmament” in the King James Version and “expanse” in most Hebrew dictionaries and modern translations. While its original meaning is uncertain, its root, raqa ( (qarf ), means to spread out, beat out, or hammer as one would a IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE The word “race,” when referring to physical characteristics, hardly ever occurs in the Bible. 1 Instead, the word “nation” is used more than 200 times. The term “race” may be used to describe ethnic groups, but is not a scientific concept. Genetic and molecular variations among the so-called “races” are trivial, although a IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE A Biblical Answer: For the last 2,000 years, hundreds of Bible scholars have tried to date the beginning of the flood. Bishop Ussher (1581–1656) proposed the most well-known date: 2348 B.C. It and Ussher’s date for the creation (4004 B.C.), were printed in the margins of many Bibles, beginning in 1611 with the King James Bible. IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Figure 14: Increasing Amounts of Carbon-14. If one thought that the C-14/C-12 ratio had always been what it is today, one would incorrectly conclude that small amounts of carbon-14 in fossils meant that much time had passed. CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC CREATION In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood takes a different look at a currently hot topic. Evidence that could revolutionize our understanding of origins is carefully explained. You will be challenged to consider fresh ideas in this age-old debate. Part I of In the Beginning discusses, in quick overview, 131categories of
THE CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC CREATION: HOME OF THE HYDROPLATE The Center for Scientific Creation: Home of the Hydroplate Theory. About This Site. The 8th Edition of In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood by Dr. Walt Brown is available to order here. It can also be read or printed out at this website; just use the links at the left to navigate through the outline of theentire book.
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Figure 3: “Unlevel” Sea Level. An amazing technological development reveals details on ocean floors. 4 In 1983, a radar altimeter on the U.S. Navy’s SEASAT satellite measured the satellite’s distance above the ocean surface with an accuracy of several inches! “Sea level” is far from level. Instead, the ocean surface “humps up” over mountains on the ocean floor and isdepressed
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE The Origin of the Grand Canyon SUMMARY: Geologists now admit that they do not know how the Grand Canyon formed, but for the last 140 years, they have insisted that the Colorado River carved the canyon over millions of years and somehow removed the evidence. 2 (Figure 43 on page 110 describes two obvious problems with that idea.) However, some so-called experts admit that the canyon’s birth IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE No. This is a common misunderstanding. Violent geshem 3 rain lasted for 40 days and 40 nights, but the floodwaters continued to rise and eventually covered all preflood mountains 150 days after the flood began. People and animals were in the Ark for more than a year—7 months after the Ark landed, because conditions outside the Ark were hostile. [To see why, read "Why Did the Floodwater Drain IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Today’s primary energy sources, fossil fuels, and nuclear reactors did not exist before the flood but are recognized today as global pollutants. 2. The rock layer—the Earth’s crust—would have had some stiffness, because it was 30–60-miles thick. However, the crust’s large area would have given it IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood - 102. Gregor Schwinghammer. 102. Gregor Schwinghammer. Gregor Schwinghammer claims he saw the Ark from an F-100 aircraft in the late 1950s, while assigned to the 428th Tactical Fighter Squadron based in Adana, Turkey. Schwinghammer said it looked like an enormous boxcarlying in
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Details Relating to McKee’sProposal
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE In 1977, the first complete baby mammoth was found—a 6 –12-month-old male named “Dima.”. His flattened, emaciated, but well-preserved body was encased in a lens of ice, 6 feet below the surface of a gentle mountainous slope. 1 Portions of the ice were clear and others quite brownish yellow with mineral and organic particles.” 2 Silt IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Is There a Large Gap of Time between Genesis 1:1and 1:2?
CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC CREATION In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood takes a different look at a currently hot topic. Evidence that could revolutionize our understanding of origins is carefully explained. You will be challenged to consider fresh ideas in this age-old debate. Part I of In the Beginning discusses, in quick overview, 131categories of
THE CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC CREATION: HOME OF THE HYDROPLATE The Center for Scientific Creation: Home of the Hydroplate Theory. About This Site. The 8th Edition of In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood by Dr. Walt Brown is available to order here. It can also be read or printed out at this website; just use the links at the left to navigate through the outline of theentire book.
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Figure 3: “Unlevel” Sea Level. An amazing technological development reveals details on ocean floors. 4 In 1983, a radar altimeter on the U.S. Navy’s SEASAT satellite measured the satellite’s distance above the ocean surface with an accuracy of several inches! “Sea level” is far from level. Instead, the ocean surface “humps up” over mountains on the ocean floor and isdepressed
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE The Origin of the Grand Canyon SUMMARY: Geologists now admit that they do not know how the Grand Canyon formed, but for the last 140 years, they have insisted that the Colorado River carved the canyon over millions of years and somehow removed the evidence. 2 (Figure 43 on page 110 describes two obvious problems with that idea.) However, some so-called experts admit that the canyon’s birth IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE No. This is a common misunderstanding. Violent geshem 3 rain lasted for 40 days and 40 nights, but the floodwaters continued to rise and eventually covered all preflood mountains 150 days after the flood began. People and animals were in the Ark for more than a year—7 months after the Ark landed, because conditions outside the Ark were hostile. [To see why, read "Why Did the Floodwater Drain IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Today’s primary energy sources, fossil fuels, and nuclear reactors did not exist before the flood but are recognized today as global pollutants. 2. The rock layer—the Earth’s crust—would have had some stiffness, because it was 30–60-miles thick. However, the crust’s large area would have given it IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood - 102. Gregor Schwinghammer. 102. Gregor Schwinghammer. Gregor Schwinghammer claims he saw the Ark from an F-100 aircraft in the late 1950s, while assigned to the 428th Tactical Fighter Squadron based in Adana, Turkey. Schwinghammer said it looked like an enormous boxcarlying in
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Details Relating to McKee’sProposal
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE In 1977, the first complete baby mammoth was found—a 6 –12-month-old male named “Dima.”. His flattened, emaciated, but well-preserved body was encased in a lens of ice, 6 feet below the surface of a gentle mountainous slope. 1 Portions of the ice were clear and others quite brownish yellow with mineral and organic particles.” 2 Silt IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Is There a Large Gap of Time between Genesis 1:1and 1:2?
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE The Hydroplate Theory: An Overview. The Origin of Ocean Trenches, Earthquakes, and the Ring of Fire. Liquefaction: The Origin of Strata and Layered Fossils. The Origin of the Grand Canyon. The Origin of Limestone. Frozen Mammoths. The Origin of Comets. The Origin of Asteroids, Meteoroids, and Trans-Neptunian Objects. IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Part I: The Scientific Case for Creation Part I is a brief summary, in outline form, of 131 categories of scientific evidence that support a sudden creation and oppose gradual evolution. As Figure 1 shows, categories 1– 42 relate to the life sciences, 43 – 93 relate generally to the astronomical and physical sciences, and 94 – 131 relate to the Earth IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Life Sciences Shown in the circular inset near the bottom of Figure 1 is the double helix representing DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid). Duplicate copies of this long tape of coded information are coiled up in almost all of the 30,000,000,000,000 (thirty trillion) cells inyour body.
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood - 102. Gregor Schwinghammer. 102. Gregor Schwinghammer. Gregor Schwinghammer claims he saw the Ark from an F-100 aircraft in the late 1950s, while assigned to the 428th Tactical Fighter Squadron based in Adana, Turkey. Schwinghammer said it looked like an enormous boxcarlying in
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE In 1977, the first complete baby mammoth was found—a 6 –12-month-old male named “Dima.”. His flattened, emaciated, but well-preserved body was encased in a lens of ice, 6 feet below the surface of a gentle mountainous slope. 1 Portions of the ice were clear and others quite brownish yellow with mineral and organic particles.” 2 Silt IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Part I of this book shows that those ideas are false. Part II will show, in ways an interested layperson can understand, the flaws in those geologic explanations and that there was a global flood, with vast and unique consequences. For example, coal, oil, and methane did not form over hundreds of millions of years; they formed in months. IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood - 1. The Law of Biogenesis. 1. The Law of Biogenesis. Spontaneous generation (the emergence of life from nonliving matter) has never been observed. All observations have shown that life comes only from life. This has been observed so consistently it is called the law ofbiogenesis.
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE In other words, when liquid water containing dissolved (or aqueous) CO 2 comes in contact with solid limestone , the limestone dissolves and the chemical reaction moves to the right. Conversely, for every 100 grams of limestone that precipitate, 44 grams of CO 2 escape the solution and the reaction shifts back to the left. . Little temperature change occurs IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THEDetails Relating to
Powell’s Proposal
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Figure 14: Increasing Amounts of Carbon-14. If one thought that the C-14/C-12 ratio had always been what it is today, one would incorrectly conclude that small amounts of carbon-14 in fossils meant that much time had passed. CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC CREATION In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood takes a different look at a currently hot topic. Evidence that could revolutionize our understanding of origins is carefully explained. You will be challenged to consider fresh ideas in this age-old debate. Part I of In the Beginning discusses, in quick overview, 131categories of
THE CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC CREATION: HOME OF THE HYDROPLATE The Center for Scientific Creation: Home of the Hydroplate Theory. About This Site. The 8th Edition of In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood by Dr. Walt Brown is available to order here. It can also be read or printed out at this website; just use the links at the left to navigate through the outline of theentire book.
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Figure 3: “Unlevel” Sea Level. An amazing technological development reveals details on ocean floors. 4 In 1983, a radar altimeter on the U.S. Navy’s SEASAT satellite measured the satellite’s distance above the ocean surface with an accuracy of several inches! “Sea level” is far from level. Instead, the ocean surface “humps up” over mountains on the ocean floor and isdepressed
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE The Origin of the Grand Canyon SUMMARY: Geologists now admit that they do not know how the Grand Canyon formed, but for the last 140 years, they have insisted that the Colorado River carved the canyon over millions of years and somehow removed the evidence. 2 (Figure 43 on page 110 describes two obvious problems with that idea.) However, some so-called experts admit that the canyon’s birth IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE No. This is a common misunderstanding. Violent geshem 3 rain lasted for 40 days and 40 nights, but the floodwaters continued to rise and eventually covered all preflood mountains 150 days after the flood began. People and animals were in the Ark for more than a year—7 months after the Ark landed, because conditions outside the Ark were hostile. [To see why, read "Why Did the Floodwater Drain IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Today’s primary energy sources, fossil fuels, and nuclear reactors did not exist before the flood but are recognized today as global pollutants. 2. The rock layer—the Earth’s crust—would have had some stiffness, because it was 30–60-miles thick. However, the crust’s large area would have given it IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood - 102. Gregor Schwinghammer. 102. Gregor Schwinghammer. Gregor Schwinghammer claims he saw the Ark from an F-100 aircraft in the late 1950s, while assigned to the 428th Tactical Fighter Squadron based in Adana, Turkey. Schwinghammer said it looked like an enormous boxcarlying in
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Details Relating to McKee’sProposal
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE In 1977, the first complete baby mammoth was found—a 6 –12-month-old male named “Dima.”. His flattened, emaciated, but well-preserved body was encased in a lens of ice, 6 feet below the surface of a gentle mountainous slope. 1 Portions of the ice were clear and others quite brownish yellow with mineral and organic particles.” 2 Silt IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THEGENESIS 1 VERSE 2GENESIS 1 1 2 COMMENTARYGENESIS 1 AND 2GENESIS 1 2 MEANINGGENESIS 12 1 9 FOR KIDSUNDERSTANDING GENESIS 1 Is There a Large Gap of Time between Genesis 1:1and 1:2?
CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC CREATION In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood takes a different look at a currently hot topic. Evidence that could revolutionize our understanding of origins is carefully explained. You will be challenged to consider fresh ideas in this age-old debate. Part I of In the Beginning discusses, in quick overview, 131categories of
THE CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC CREATION: HOME OF THE HYDROPLATE The Center for Scientific Creation: Home of the Hydroplate Theory. About This Site. The 8th Edition of In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood by Dr. Walt Brown is available to order here. It can also be read or printed out at this website; just use the links at the left to navigate through the outline of theentire book.
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Figure 3: “Unlevel” Sea Level. An amazing technological development reveals details on ocean floors. 4 In 1983, a radar altimeter on the U.S. Navy’s SEASAT satellite measured the satellite’s distance above the ocean surface with an accuracy of several inches! “Sea level” is far from level. Instead, the ocean surface “humps up” over mountains on the ocean floor and isdepressed
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE The Origin of the Grand Canyon SUMMARY: Geologists now admit that they do not know how the Grand Canyon formed, but for the last 140 years, they have insisted that the Colorado River carved the canyon over millions of years and somehow removed the evidence. 2 (Figure 43 on page 110 describes two obvious problems with that idea.) However, some so-called experts admit that the canyon’s birth IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE No. This is a common misunderstanding. Violent geshem 3 rain lasted for 40 days and 40 nights, but the floodwaters continued to rise and eventually covered all preflood mountains 150 days after the flood began. People and animals were in the Ark for more than a year—7 months after the Ark landed, because conditions outside the Ark were hostile. [To see why, read "Why Did the Floodwater Drain IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Today’s primary energy sources, fossil fuels, and nuclear reactors did not exist before the flood but are recognized today as global pollutants. 2. The rock layer—the Earth’s crust—would have had some stiffness, because it was 30–60-miles thick. However, the crust’s large area would have given it IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood - 102. Gregor Schwinghammer. 102. Gregor Schwinghammer. Gregor Schwinghammer claims he saw the Ark from an F-100 aircraft in the late 1950s, while assigned to the 428th Tactical Fighter Squadron based in Adana, Turkey. Schwinghammer said it looked like an enormous boxcarlying in
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Details Relating to McKee’sProposal
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE In 1977, the first complete baby mammoth was found—a 6 –12-month-old male named “Dima.”. His flattened, emaciated, but well-preserved body was encased in a lens of ice, 6 feet below the surface of a gentle mountainous slope. 1 Portions of the ice were clear and others quite brownish yellow with mineral and organic particles.” 2 Silt IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THEGENESIS 1 VERSE 2GENESIS 1 1 2 COMMENTARYGENESIS 1 AND 2GENESIS 1 2 MEANINGGENESIS 12 1 9 FOR KIDSUNDERSTANDING GENESIS 1 Is There a Large Gap of Time between Genesis 1:1and 1:2?
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE The Hydroplate Theory: An Overview. The Origin of Ocean Trenches, Earthquakes, and the Ring of Fire. Liquefaction: The Origin of Strata and Layered Fossils. The Origin of the Grand Canyon. The Origin of Limestone. Frozen Mammoths. The Origin of Comets. The Origin of Asteroids, Meteoroids, and Trans-Neptunian Objects. IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Part I: The Scientific Case for Creation Part I is a brief summary, in outline form, of 131 categories of scientific evidence that support a sudden creation and oppose gradual evolution. As Figure 1 shows, categories 1– 42 relate to the life sciences, 43 – 93 relate generally to the astronomical and physical sciences, and 94 – 131 relate to the Earth IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Life Sciences Shown in the circular inset near the bottom of Figure 1 is the double helix representing DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid). Duplicate copies of this long tape of coded information are coiled up in almost all of the 30,000,000,000,000 (thirty trillion) cells inyour body.
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood - 102. Gregor Schwinghammer. 102. Gregor Schwinghammer. Gregor Schwinghammer claims he saw the Ark from an F-100 aircraft in the late 1950s, while assigned to the 428th Tactical Fighter Squadron based in Adana, Turkey. Schwinghammer said it looked like an enormous boxcarlying in
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE In 1977, the first complete baby mammoth was found—a 6 –12-month-old male named “Dima.”. His flattened, emaciated, but well-preserved body was encased in a lens of ice, 6 feet below the surface of a gentle mountainous slope. 1 Portions of the ice were clear and others quite brownish yellow with mineral and organic particles.” 2 Silt IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Part I of this book shows that those ideas are false. Part II will show, in ways an interested layperson can understand, the flaws in those geologic explanations and that there was a global flood, with vast and unique consequences. For example, coal, oil, and methane did not form over hundreds of millions of years; they formed in months. IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood - 1. The Law of Biogenesis. 1. The Law of Biogenesis. Spontaneous generation (the emergence of life from nonliving matter) has never been observed. All observations have shown that life comes only from life. This has been observed so consistently it is called the law ofbiogenesis.
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE In other words, when liquid water containing dissolved (or aqueous) CO 2 comes in contact with solid limestone , the limestone dissolves and the chemical reaction moves to the right. Conversely, for every 100 grams of limestone that precipitate, 44 grams of CO 2 escape the solution and the reaction shifts back to the left. . Little temperature change occurs IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THEDetails Relating to
Powell’s Proposal
IN THE BEGINNING: COMPELLING EVIDENCE FOR CREATION AND THE Figure 14: Increasing Amounts of Carbon-14. If one thought that the C-14/C-12 ratio had always been what it is today, one would incorrectly conclude that small amounts of carbon-14 in fossils meant that much time had passed.Skip to content
CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC CREATION In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood* Home
* Online Book
__
This greatly expanded new edition—comprehensive, understandable, and meticulously documented—will give insights to readers of all backgrounds. In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood takes a different look at a currently hot topic. Evidence that could revolutionize our understanding of origins is carefully explained. You will be challenged to consider fresh ideas in thisage-old debate.
Part I of In the Beginning discusses, in quick overview, 131 categories of evidence from biology, astronomy, and the physical and earth sciences. More technical discussions and documentation are found in the author’s extensive endnotes. Does the scientific evidence support evolution or creation? * What insights do genetics and the fossil record provide? * How old is the earth? What dating techniques indicate a youngearth?
* What discoveries in outer space relate to our beginnings? * Does Noah’s Ark exist? What is the CIA’s “Ararat Anomaly”? Part II describes the hydroplate theory, developed during more than 35 years of study by Dr. Walt Brown, a former evolutionist. This theory explains a catastrophic event in earth’s history and solves a host of recognized problems. For decades, evolutionists complained that creationists only criticized evolution and did not offer sound scientific theories of their own. The hydroplate theory ends that complaint and explains, with overwhelming evidence, earth’s defining geological event—a worldwide flood. * If there was a global flood, where did the water come from? Wheredid it go?
* What were the powerful fountains of the great deep? * How was the Grand Canyon carved in weeks after a post-flood lake (Grand Lake) breached? * What evidence shows that the material in comets, asteroids, and meteoroids came from Earth? * What suddenly froze and buried the mammoths? How could they have survived the 6-month winter nights inside the Arctic Circle? * How did mountains ranges, volcanoes, submarine canyons, coal and oil deposits, and deep ocean trenches form? * What processes sorted fossils and produced layered strata? Thirty-nine other frequently asked questions fill a fascinating PartIII, including:
* Is global warming occurring? If so, what causes it? * Have scientific tools detected traces of Adam and Eve within us? * Is evolution compatible with the Bible? * How accurate is radiocarbon dating? * What about the dinosaurs? * How can the study of creation be scientific? * Is there life in outer space? * Galaxies are billions of light-years away, so isn’t the universe billions of years old? * What hydroplate predictions have been confirmed?ONLINE BOOK
Copyright © 2020 Center for Scientific Creation . Powered by WordPress . Theme: Ample by ThemeGrill.
__
Details
Copyright © 2024 ArchiveBay.com. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | DMCA | 2021 | Feedback | Advertising | RSS 2.0